Forum Settings
Forums
New
What did you think of this episode?
DO NOT discuss the source material beyond this episode. If you want to discuss future events or theories, please use separate threads.
DO NOT ask where to watch/download this episode or give links to copyrighted, non-fair use material.
DO NOT troll/bait/harass/abuse other users for liking or disliking the series/characters.
DO read the Anime Discussion Rules and Site & Forum Guidelines.
Pages (11) « 1 2 [3] 4 5 » ... Last »
Feb 3, 2009 5:42 PM

Offline
Aug 2008
112
naikou said:
Ketuekigami said:
Also Touka only has 1 spare body, its not as if she can make new ones ever day, it takes work that takes years maybe even centuries to accomplish that level of magic. She wouldnt be able to creat infinite bodys for anyone and even if she could she wouldnt be able to replicate Shikis ability since it is comes from Shikis brain.

How do we know that? All she has to do is make one clone of herself. That clone can make another clone of herself. And that clone can make another clone, forever and ever.I mean, once they explain why she can't do that, I'll have no problem buying your argument, but in the meantime, Touko is essentially invincible.


It's not a clone. It's a puppet. And it needs a soul to operate it.



naikou said:
Ketuekigami said:
The reason Shiki escaped was pretty obvious and didnt need much explanation if you remember what her power is. she can destroy any magic barrier so of course it they didnt need to explain what happened.

Right, but that doesn't explain why Araya didn't just.... tie her up. Even if she can figure out how to "kill" the ropes, I'd like to see how she would do it without being able to move. Either Araya is extremely stupid, or Shiki's power is even more hax than it seems.


Araya isn't your normal kidnapper, he is a magician for christ sake. Since you have just explained the mistake Araya made, which Touko pointed out in the Movie, so I don't really know what you're point is. If you're saying Araya is stupid for not tieing her up. It's almost like saying why didn't Lelouch geass everyone to listen to him in the first place (Yes I know its a stupid example).

naikou said:
Ketuekigami said:
And again, she can "somehow "killed" appendicitis with her knife" because of her power, if you forgot what it is look into it just a little bit and it will become obvious.

Appendicitis is an inflammation. What did she kill? The fact that the appendix was inflamed? What she did was roughly equivalent to somehow killing a bruise (by stabbing it). It's completely stupid.


She destroyed the existence of it. She didn't cut (kill, or w/e) it.
Feb 3, 2009 5:48 PM

Offline
Dec 2007
6641
btw, im not pulling all of these answers out of my ass. all the different elements such as "souls", "magic and magi", and everything else is present in Type-Moons other works and im able to understand it all thoroughly because its explained in each way differently and more in depth (it would take literally 30 mins to explain most of the things and they did spend 30 mins explaining them in the games).

one: the clone cant be activated until she dies because once she dies her "soul" is automatically implanted into the clone. she cant replicate her "soul" so she cant just make an army of living replicas. only 1 can be alive at a time.

two: thats because Arya didnt know the limits of her ability. There are only a handful of people who have her ability (handful bieng a number below 5) in the word and even so the extent they can use the powers are different (see Shiki from Tsukihime). And Araya isnt stupid, his magic is enough to bind almost anyone indefinitely. with the confidence of him knowing that and the lack of knowledge of Shikis ability he didnt think she would be able to break out.

three: I know the answer to that is very vague but it is explained but not in the movies. the answer to that is more in Tsukihime but her ability can "kill" the concept of things. for example even things that dont have a form such as magic still has a "death" and she can kill it, but it must be something that exists. a bruise is not something we can use in the explanation but a disease or a tumor is. Also, Shiki didnt "kill" Fuginos appendicitis. she killed her pain, witch could be the equivalent of destroying the nervs in her brain that is causing the pain.

but whatever, it may sound stupid to you but Type-Moon has built an extremely successful company on these "stupid" as you would say concepts, and gathered hordes of fans, so if anything what you think is "stupid" is probably just you trying to find fault with it in any way you can or just over thinking everything and trying to say that in real life this is so ridiculously impossible, but its all completely reasonable and explainable in the Type-Moon world.
KetuekigamiFeb 3, 2009 5:52 PM
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines.
Feb 3, 2009 5:50 PM

Offline
Sep 2007
2551
Uminekko said:
It's not a clone. It's a puppet. And it needs a soul to operate it.

Call it what you want. I still haven't seen a reason why she couldn't mass-produce them.

Uminekko said:
Araya isn't your normal kidnapper, he is a magician for christ sake. Since you have just explained the mistake Araya made, which Touko pointed out in the Movie, so I don't really know what you're point is. If you're saying Araya is stupid for not tieing her up. It's almost like saying why didn't Lelouch geass everyone to listen to him in the first place (Yes I know its a stupid example).

It's funny because I had that exact problem with Code Geass. But anyway, what you're saying is that Araya locked her inside a magical barrier after he saw her break his seals, and then he didn't bother to prevent her from moving around and damaging the seals.

If that's the case, then fine, but it just lowers my opinion of the writing of the movie.

Uminekko said:
She destroyed the existence of it. She didn't cut (kill, or w/e) it.

She destroyed the existence... of the inflammation of her appendix. By stabbing it. o.O
Feb 3, 2009 5:56 PM

Offline
Aug 2008
112
naikou said:
Uminekko said:
It's not a clone. It's a puppet. And it needs a soul to operate it.

Call it what you want. I still haven't seen a reason why she couldn't mass-produce them.

Uminekko said:
Araya isn't your normal kidnapper, he is a magician for christ sake. Since you have just explained the mistake Araya made, which Touko pointed out in the Movie, so I don't really know what you're point is. If you're saying Araya is stupid for not tieing her up. It's almost like saying why didn't Lelouch geass everyone to listen to him in the first place (Yes I know its a stupid example).

It's funny because I had that exact problem with Code Geass. But anyway, what you're saying is that Araya locked her inside a magical barrier after he saw her break his seals, and then he didn't bother to prevent her from moving around and damaging the seals.

If that's the case, then fine, but it just lowers my opinion of the writing of the movie.

Uminekko said:
She destroyed the existence of it. She didn't cut (kill, or w/e) it.

She destroyed the existence... of the inflammation of her appendix. By stabbing it. o.O





1. Who said she stabbed it?
2. Seals =/= magic barriers. And it is repeated don't know how many times that. She cuts existences. And she was sound sleep at the "source" when Araya captured her.
3. Puppets so close to a human body isn't something you can mass produce, it requires a long long time, and a massive amount of magical energy to link the nerves, forming tissues, etc.

All of the things i said above were also explained in the movies.

IiotokoFeb 3, 2009 6:02 PM
Feb 3, 2009 6:00 PM

Offline
Dec 2007
6641
if your looking for exact answers your looking in the wrong place. it took the Fate/Stay Night and Tsukihime game 10s of 20s of 50s of hours to explain all the questions your asking so if you dont want to be here discussing it for days and days i suggest you either play the games or dont complain because you seem to be thinking that you will understand if we tell you in a few words but its not gonna happen. The Type-Moon works have some of the most in depth and complicated stories ever written. its a world of magic were logic doesnt apply.
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines.
Feb 3, 2009 6:01 PM

Offline
Aug 2008
112
Ketuekigami said:
if your looking for exact answers your looking in the wrong place. it took the Fate/Stay Night and Tsukihime game 10s of 20s of 50s of hours to explain all the questions your answering so if you dont want to be here discussing it for days and days i suggest you either play the games or dont complain because you seem to be thinking that you will understand if we tell you in a few words but its not gonna happen. The Type-Moon works have some of the most in depth and complicated stories ever written.



Stop.. Please.. You're making this sound so complex and hard to understand when it's not.
Feb 3, 2009 6:03 PM

Offline
Sep 2007
2551
Uminekko said:
1. Who said she stabbed it?

That's what happened! She says, "If you were in pain, why didn't you say so?" And then she stabs her in the stomach. Then she walks out of the complex and says, "I killed the disease inside of her. If you're quick, you might be able to save her."

Uminekko said:
2. Seals =/= magic barriers. And it is repeated don't know how many times that. She cuts existences.

Oh, right. Because there's a huge freaking difference between "seals" and "magic barriers".

Uminekko said:
3. Puppets so close to a human body isn't something you can mass produce, it requires a long long time, and mass magic energy to link the nerves and forming tissues.

There's absolutely no evidence for that statement yet. For all we know, they can be produced in a factory. But suppose you're right. Suppose she only has one spare at a time. The second she dies, she goes to work building a new spare. She is still invincible (or nearly so).
Feb 3, 2009 6:04 PM

Offline
Dec 2007
6641
Uminekko said:
Ketuekigami said:
if your looking for exact answers your looking in the wrong place. it took the Fate/Stay Night and Tsukihime game 10s of 20s of 50s of hours to explain all the questions your answering so if you dont want to be here discussing it for days and days i suggest you either play the games or dont complain because you seem to be thinking that you will understand if we tell you in a few words but its not gonna happen. The Type-Moon works have some of the most in depth and complicated stories ever written.



Stop.. Please.. You're making this sound so complex and hard to understand when it's not.

its not for us because weve played the games. all the questions about magic and Mystic eyes are explained thoroughly there but without that info it would sound far fetched to people who think about it to seriously like naikou here.

EDIT
naikou said:
Uminekko said:
1. Who said she stabbed it?

That's what happened! She says, "If you were in pain, why didn't you say so?" And then she stabs her in the stomach. Then she walks out of the complex and says, "I killed the disease inside of her. If you're quick, you might be able to save her."

Uminekko said:
2. Seals =/= magic barriers. And it is repeated don't know how many times that. She cuts existences.

Oh, right. Because there's a huge freaking difference between "seals" and "magic barriers".

Uminekko said:
3. Puppets so close to a human body isn't something you can mass produce, it requires a long long time, and mass magic energy to link the nerves and forming tissues.

There's absolutely no evidence for that statement yet. For all we know, they can be produced in a factory. But suppose you're right. Suppose she only has one spare at a time. The second she dies, she goes to work building a new spare. She is still invincible (or nearly so).

naikou... just ... stop. if you were expecting questions like this to be answered the way your asking the movie would have been another 2 hours long. Stop asking for exact explanations then saying theres no evidence for it. it just makes you sound like an asshole who cant enjoy a fictional story without every last bit of info being explained.

And alot of this info was present in the other movies, you probably werent paying attention because you hated them so much.
KetuekigamiFeb 3, 2009 6:12 PM
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines.
Feb 3, 2009 6:25 PM

Offline
Sep 2007
2551
It's easy to make claims without any evidence. You're entitled to feel however you want about the movie, but don't try to refute my criticisms if you can't even come up with some proof to back up your claims.

Ketuekigami said:
it just makes you sound like an asshole who cant enjoy a fictional story without every last bit of info being explained.

Inconsistencies bother me. They detract from my enjoyment, especially from movies which are trying to go for a serious tone like Kara no Kyoukai. If you're willing to overlook writing flaws, then that's fine. Don't expect me to do the same.
Feb 3, 2009 6:28 PM

Offline
Jun 2008
3162
Shiki is just so awesome <3 <3 <3 <3

I doubt I would enjoy KnK nearly as much if she wasn't in it

that other crazy character was awesome too. He almost seemed like a Baccano character xD
Feb 3, 2009 6:28 PM

Offline
Feb 2008
3962
Saw naikou last post update in here just to end up with this (page 6 only).

Thank Haruhi-sama, i haven't spoiled myself yet.

Keep up the good work fellas.
Feb 3, 2009 6:34 PM

Offline
Dec 2007
6641
naikou said:
It's easy to make claims without any evidence. You're entitled to feel however you want about the movie, but don't try to refute my criticisms if you can't even come up with some proof to back up your claims.

Ketuekigami said:
it just makes you sound like an asshole who cant enjoy a fictional story without every last bit of info being explained.

Inconsistencies bother me. They detract from my enjoyment, especially from movies which are trying to go for a serious tone like Kara no Kyoukai. If you're willing to overlook writing flaws, then that's fine. Don't expect me to do the same.

we have been explaining everything youve been saying but your only answer has been "theres no proof" when our proof is our knowledge of the Type-Moon world, and get this... the fact that we've played the games and read the novels. if your not gonna listen to someone with that much more knowledge then you then your never gonna understand.. we have plenty of proof but you just done seem to be listening. It seems that the only proof your going to ever accept is if we said "at so and so point in the movie this is explained" but get this... its not gonna happen because we'd have to go through every movie and tell you that and im not gonna work that hard to convince you on something that your just not gonna accept.

There are no writing flaws that you have brought up. everything has been explained in the previous movies and if you want the answers then go back and watch them without thinking how "horrible" you think they are because you wont pay attention that way.
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines.
Feb 3, 2009 6:41 PM

Offline
Sep 2007
2551
Ketuekigami said:
we have been explaining everything youve been saying but your only answer has been "theres no proof" when our proof is our knowledge of the Type-Moon world.

That's funny, because I've actually played through Tsukihime and Melty Blood, and seen Fate/Stay Night, and I don't remember it explaining anywhere why Touko is limited to one clone. Or how long it takes for her to make a new clone.

Perhaps you could tell me exactly where in the "Type-moon world" this is explained?

Ketuekigami said:
There our no writing flaws that you have brought up.


You mean like these ones?

naikou said:
I don't like the way Shiki helped the Emiya-clone at the beginning of the movie. Felt totally out of character from what we've seen in the past few movies. She definitely did not seem like the type to hunt down a guy who dropped his key, rescue him from thugs, and then allow him to stay in her room for a week. The unexplained change in her character bothers me.


naikou said:
The explanation for how Shiki escaped the "enclosed space" was also pretty vague. Textbook example of a deus ex machina. Somehow, she managed to "cut" the building?


naikou said:
Touko can create infinite puppets for herself to re-activate once she dies.
Feb 3, 2009 6:51 PM

Offline
Dec 2007
6641
all the things about Mystic eyes are explained in Tsukihime and all Magic is in FSN. and yes, you will get absolutely no information from the FSN anime if your looking for answers there. Oh and if youve really played through Tsukihime you should understand about Shikis ability but it seems you werent paying enough attention there either.

how about this... weve already explained all of those but you just dont seem to accept our answers. so i dont see the point in trying to explain something to someone who wont accept the answers that were explained to them. If you want answers to those apparent "flaws in the plot" go back and look at our answers. its as simple as that.

oh and btw, if your gonna quote and respond to only half of my reply i dont see how we're gonna get anywhere. how bout the fact that i said its all explained in the previous movies and if you cant understand that then your never gonna understand anything in the movies and dont expect me to explain them when all your gonna say is "theres no proof" when its all there in the previous 4 movies.
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines.
Feb 3, 2009 6:51 PM

Offline
Aug 2008
112
That's funny, because I've actually played through Tsukihime and Melty Blood, and seen Fate/Stay Night, and I don't remember it explaining anywhere why Touko is limited to one clone. Or how long it takes for her to make a new clone.

Perhaps you could tell me exactly where in the "Type-moon" world, this is explained?


You better check the dictionary for what clone means. Clones are made by genetic engineering.
It's a >>handmade<< puppet that functions the same as a normal human body. Even if she has a whole basement of her puppets, Touko is not invisible, remember how Araya kept the head unscratched for her not to go to the next puppet.


As for the "writing flaws"
Blame the director for not making it clear then, since it was fully explained in the novel.


Oh just in case you say anything similar to "then why are you defending how great it is."
I'm only trying to get you clear up some stuff, so maybe you can enjoy it more (but it seems my answers weren't good enough for you).
IiotokoFeb 3, 2009 7:05 PM
Feb 3, 2009 7:05 PM

Offline
Sep 2007
2551
Ketuekigami said:
all the things about Mystic eyes are explained in Tsukihime and all Magic is in FSN.

Could you be a little more specific? The only mystic eyes thing I remember is Akiha's ability, which seems to be quite different from Shiki's.

Ketuekigami said:
oh and btw, if your gonna quote and respond to only half of my reply i dont see how we're gonna get anywhere. how bout the fact that i said its all explained in the previous movies and if you cant understand that then your never gonna understand anything in the movies and dont expect me to explain them when all your gonna say is "theres no proof" when its all there in the previous 4 movies.

What arguments specifically do you want me to respond to? You keep saying "go back and read my posts," but I have no idea what part you're referring to. I could do the same thing, watch:

You obviously don't understand, go back and read all of my posts if you want to know why I think this isn't the greatest anime of all time.

See? That gets us nowhere. If you want me to reply to something, simply quote it again, and I'll do my best to respond. I apologize if I skipped over anything you think is important.

Uminekko said:
You better check the dictionary for what clone means. Clones are made by genetic engineering.
It's a >>handmade<< puppet that functions the same as a normal human body. Even if she has a whole basement of her puppets. And Touko is not invisible, remember how Araya kept the head unscratched for her not to go to the next puppet.

I don't see why the distinction between clones and puppets is important, but if you prefer, I'll call them puppets. Even if you keep her head in a jar, you can't do more than inconvenience her slightly. Eventually someone will break the jar, or she'll die of starvation, or that body will get old and wear out.

Uminekko said:
Blame the director for not making it clear then, since it was fully explained in the novel.

I think I'll do just that. Regardless of how good the book is, the anime should stand on its own.
Feb 3, 2009 7:11 PM

Offline
Sep 2007
700
Last time I checked, Akiha didn't have any Mystic Eyes, at all. Her ability is in a completely diferent level from Ryougi Shiki's.
Feb 3, 2009 7:15 PM

Offline
Sep 2007
2551
My bad. I meant the ability to see Akiha's ability that various characters in Tsukihime have.
Feb 3, 2009 7:18 PM

Offline
Aug 2008
112
This is gonna be my last post in this thread, I'm getting really tired of this.

I don't see why the distinction between clones and puppets is important, but if you prefer, I'll call them puppets. Even if you keep her head in a jar, you can't do more than inconvenience her slightly. Eventually someone will break the jar, or she'll die of starvation, or that body will get old and wear out.


You don't have to read all of it. Just in case you don't know how a clone is made.

Reproductive cloning uses "somatic cell nuclear transfer" (SCNT) to create animals that are genetically identical. This process entails the transfer of a nucleus from a donor adult cell (somatic cell) to an egg which has no nucleus. If the egg begins to divide normally it is transferred into the uterus of the surrogate mother.
Such clones are not strictly identical since the somatic cells may contain mutations in their nuclear DNA. Additionally, the mitochondria in the cytoplasm also contains DNA and during SCNT this DNA is wholly from the donor egg, thus the mitochondrial genome is not the same as that of the nucleus donor cell from which it was produced. This may have important implications for cross-species nuclear transfer in which nuclear-mitochondrial incompatibilities may lead to death.

As for the head in a jar.
The head isn't alive. Touko that time was considered "dead", but she can't move her entire soul without having her original body totally destroyed. ...And Formalin exists in the TM world.

I hope that you are now a little bit clear about the movie now.
IiotokoFeb 3, 2009 7:25 PM
Feb 3, 2009 7:26 PM

Offline
Dec 2007
6641
same here, im done... this is ridiculous.

Shiki (Tohno)s eyes, which are basically the same as Ryougai's is explained through the entire game. there is no "where is it", its in the main 2 routes. Arcueid explains it at least 3 times in her route.

Actually you cant say the same thing to me because all iv been saying the whole time is "its all explained in all 5 movies". Just go back and pay attention and it will all be clear.
Ex 1: you see Touka working on making puppets by connecting nerves but it was obviously something that takes time. She doesnt just "magically put them together" there "hand made" meaning "she does everything with her hands.
Ex1.5: Touko says (in #5) that when she is killed her soul is implanted into the clone (puppet).

example found outside and inside KnK.
EX 2: and you would know this if you played Tsukihime. quote from Arcueid. "you can kill anything as long as it exists, armor or magical enhancements dont matter for you". Shikis (both of them) can "kill" anything as long as it exists. that includes magic (as shown in KnK #3 when Shiki "killed" Fuginos ability) and living things. Also she can "kill" things without any limitation of where or what it is, as in Tsukihime when Shiki killed the poison that was in Kohaku.

This argument will go nowhere because of your refusal to pay closer attention to the previous movies so theres no point in arguing this anymore. All the previous movies were meant to lead up to this one and everything from #5 was at least explained beforehand if not in the actual movie.
KetuekigamiFeb 3, 2009 7:33 PM
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines.
Feb 3, 2009 7:39 PM

Offline
Sep 2007
2551
Ketuekigami said:
Ex 1: you see Touka working on making puppets by connecting nerves but it was obviously something that takes time. She doesnt just magically put them together "there "hand made" meaning "she does everything with her hands."
Ex1.5: Touko says (in #5) that when she is killed her soul is implanted into the clone (puppet).

Alright, granted, it takes a long time to make the puppets. I'll give you that. But what stops her from making more than one? As long as she has at least one clone alive, she can't die. As long as she can't die, she can make more clones puppets. Thus, she is almost invincible.

What part of this not make sense to you? Why would Touko not have at least 3 clones made for her, if her life depended on it? Even if it takes years to make them, wouldn't you do it if it guaranteed that you wouldn't die?

Ketuekigami said:
EX 2: and you wond know this if you played Tsukihime. quote from Arcueid. "you can kill anything as long as it exists, armaments or magical enhancements dont matter for you". Shikis (both of them) can "kill anything as long as it exists. that includes magic (as shown in KnK #3 when Shiki "killed" Fuginos ability) and living things.

Alright. So she can kill anything. I get that. But I still think it's absolutely ridiculous. If she can kill things as abstract as "appendicitis," what stops her from killing, say... "time"? Or "electricity"?

There has to be a limit somewhere. Could Shiki kill heat? Or kill the darkness? It just doesn't make sense... there's nothing to kill.
Feb 3, 2009 8:07 PM

Offline
Dec 2007
6641
Some of the questions your asking have never been answered since there has been no need to answer them so if i am im only going by Type-Moon logic (and there is such a thing). But I dont think you remember anything from Tsukihime otherwise you wouldn't be asking and all of the questions about her eyes and if you played FSN all of your questions about "magic" that your asking would be clear.

i would say she doesnt have multiple because for one, she said she made "a" clone a long time ago. if she made more then one she would have worded it differently, and she has to replicate her power in that clone. As shown in FSN by Rin when using magic of that caliber to put magic into objects it takes time. it has to be done little by little and since Touko doesnt specialize in that kind of magic like Rin does it would take all the longer. The main issue is that replicating her power is not something she can casually do over and over again, its advanced sorcery by Type-Moon standards and isnt easily by any means. If she were to make multiple bodies in a short period of time they would be significantly weaker then her current self.

And even if she is invincible, she isnt a powerful magi when it comes to fighting by any means so counting on here "invincibility" wont do much in a fight against skilled magi like Araya.

Thats because it has to be at least be able to be understood by the human brain. Its explained in Tsukihime that there eyes just open up unused pathways (magic circuits) in the brain that allow them to see what normal humans cant, but things with no form like Time, heat, or darkness arent able to be seen through the human brain. If she even tried to kill certain things that are way beyond her understanding she would fry her brain (which is also explained in Tsukihime) and turn into a vegetable. The limit on what she can kill all comes down to "human understanding" (in the Type-Moon world).

And its not anymore ridiculous then some of the powers found in other anime so if you want to complain about the level of what they can do go complain about other anime as well.

But seriously, this is too much work explaining Type-Moon logic to you so im out. If you seriously want these questions answered play FSN, replay Tsukihime, and read KnK because these are all questions that you are thinking way to much about and should in no way lessen the experience of the movie.
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines.
Feb 3, 2009 8:13 PM
Offline
Jun 2007
479
I agree. This is more Type-Moon logic. It's not something you can just explain. You'll have to see it yourself.
Feb 3, 2009 8:17 PM

Offline
Sep 2007
700
Or, you can go the easy (hard?) way out and read all the terms used in the Nasuverse that consists of Fate/Stay Night, Tsukihime and Kara no Kyoukai.

http://www2.ocn.ne.jp/~typemoon/

http://typemoon.wikia.com/wiki/TYPE-MOON_Wiki

http://nrvnqsr.proboards20.com/index.cgi

There are other places, but these two usually do the job.

Edit: Couldn't really forget about Beast's Lair.
MassakiFeb 3, 2009 8:20 PM
Feb 3, 2009 8:20 PM

Offline
Sep 2007
2551
Ketuekigami said:
Thats because it has to be at least be able to be understood by the human brain. Its explained in Tsukihime that there eyes just open up unused pathways (magic circuits) in the brain that allow them to see what normal humans cant, but things with no form like Time, heat, or darkness arent able to be seen through the human brain. If she even tried to kill certain things that are way beyond her understanding she would fry her brain (which is also explained in Tsukihime) and turn into a vegetable. The limit on what she can kill all comes down to "human understanding" (in the Type-Moon world).

Much better. That makes her ability less broken. It doesn't change the fact that she managed to kill appendicitis with a knife (which is laughable, any way you look at it), but I'm willing to overlook that fact.

Ketuekigami said:
But seriously, this is too much work explaining Type-Moon logic to you so im out. If you seriously want these questions answered play FSN, replay Tsukihime, and read KnK because these are all questions that you are thinking way to much about and should in no way lessen the experience of the movie.

More importantly, why should I have to play through everything Type-Moon has ever done in order to understand the logic of the movie? That itself is a flaw. It would be like if I were reading Shakespeare, and they made references to totally unrelated things in plays I might not have read. Like I'm reading Hamlet, and suddenly there's a scene where they go on about how tragic Juliet's death was.
Feb 3, 2009 8:20 PM

Offline
Dec 2007
6641
Drengot said:
I agree. This is more Type-Moon logic. It's not something you can just explain. You'll have to see it yourself.

Yes, this has gotten to the point wher it has nothing to do with the movie and everything to do with Type-Moon.

Massaki said:
Or, you can go the easy (hard?) way out and read all the terms used in the Nasuverse that consists of Fate/Stay Night, Tsukihime and Kara no Kyoukai.

http://www2.ocn.ne.jp/~typemoon/

http://typemoon.wikia.com/wiki/TYPE-MOON_Wiki

There are other places, but these two usually do the job.

lol thats what i before i played FSN... but i did it for fun.


naikou said:

More importantly, why should I have to play through everything Type-Moon has ever done in order to understand the logic of the movie? That itself is a flaw. It would be like if I were reading Shakespeare, and they made references to totally unrelated things in plays I might not have read. Like I'm reading Hamlet, and suddenly there's a scene where they go on about how tragic Juliet's death was.

like i said...
Ketuekigami said:

these are all questions that you are thinking way to much about and should in no way lessen the experience of the movie.

This has nothing to do with the movie anymore. its gotten to the point of Type-Moon in general since your asking questions that never even appeared in the movie but are your or questions... like "why doesnt Touka make infinite clones?" that has nothing to do with the overall story.
KetuekigamiFeb 3, 2009 8:27 PM
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines.
Feb 3, 2009 8:31 PM

Offline
Sep 2007
2551
Ketuekigami said:
This has nothing to do with the movie anymore. its gotten to the point of Type-Moon in general since your asking questions that never even appeared in the movie but are your or questions... like "why doesnt Touka make infinite clones?" that has nothing to do with the overall story.

It's not directly connected to the story, but if I know that the characters can just come back from the dead, I'm certainly not going to feel any of the pressure I'm supposed to feel when they get into trouble. Which was my original point.
Feb 3, 2009 8:46 PM

Offline
Dec 2007
6641
naikou said:
Ketuekigami said:
This has nothing to do with the movie anymore. its gotten to the point of Type-Moon in general since your asking questions that never even appeared in the movie but are your or questions... like "why doesnt Touka make infinite clones?" that has nothing to do with the overall story.

It's not directly connected to the story, but if I know that the characters can just come back from the dead, I'm certainly not going to feel any of the pressure I'm supposed to feel when they get into trouble. Which was my original point.

Then let me answer your original question as someone with enough Type-Moon knowledge to answer. Even if Touka can make 1 new body every time she dies she wouldnt be able to do it for Shiki and Kouktou simply on the fact that neither of them have the knowledge or ability to move their soul after death and Touka cant replicate Shiki's eyes. Also if Touka has any spare bodies like the 1 she used in the movie she most likely only has 1 spare body at any given time because it is too much work to make them.

So in short.. ya, Touka has a partial immortality but seeing as there are ways to kill the soul as well as the body in Type-Moon (Shiki Tohno's eyes and Seventh Holy Scriptures can do it) it is no where near perfect. And to add for the final time, it would be impossible for Shiki or Kouktou to use spare bodies for the reasons i provided.

Happy, Shiki and Kouktou cannot come back to life by using clones. this is most likely the clearest answer you are gonna get from me and most likely anyone else. And if you say its invalid because i have no proof then all i can say is that all the proof for this is in the FSN game and if you want it go play for your self.
KetuekigamiFeb 3, 2009 8:49 PM
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines.
Feb 3, 2009 8:56 PM

Offline
Sep 2007
2551
I'll buy that. Shiki and Kokutou aren't immortal, then. And Touka is only in trouble if someone comes after her with a soul-killing abillity. Let's hope someone in the next few movies can do that, or it's going to be pretty dull.
Feb 3, 2009 9:00 PM

Offline
Aug 2008
112
naikou said:
Ketuekigami said:
This has nothing to do with the movie anymore. its gotten to the point of Type-Moon in general since your asking questions that never even appeared in the movie but are your or questions... like "why doesnt Touka make infinite clones?" that has nothing to do with the overall story.

It's not directly connected to the story, but if I know that the characters can just come back from the dead, I'm certainly not going to feel any of the pressure I'm supposed to feel when they get into trouble. Which was my original point.


I can't stand this anymore.
You obliviously didn't read my last post.
2 hours ago Uminekko said:
....... As for the head in a jar.
The head isn't alive. Touko that time was considered "dead", but she can't move her entire soul without having her original body totally destroyed, therefore Touko is not invincible. ...And Formalin exists in the TM world.



And Ketuekigami,
The novel came first. Before FSN, TSUKI so theres absolutely no point in bring them up.
Feb 3, 2009 9:05 PM

Offline
Sep 2007
2551
I read your post, but it's mostly a moot point. Even if Touko is technically dead when her head is soaked in formaldehyde, the odds of her eventually coming back are pretty good. They aren't zero, in any case, which would be "death". So like I said, it's more of a temporary inconvenience to her.

So in other words even if her head gets stolen and put in a jar again (which would be lame), I'd still think of her as temporarily out of commission rather than "dead".
Feb 3, 2009 9:07 PM

Offline
Dec 2007
6641
Uminekko said:

And Ketuekigami,
The novel came first. Before FSN, TSUKI so theres absolutely no point in bring them up.

i know that, i meant to playing FSN and Tsuki to understand the concept of magic and MEoDP in Type-Moon. its pretty well explained in the games and thats what his questions were about. its certainly explained alot more then in KnK. i only said that because the questions werent directed at the KnK story. if it was id say to go read the novel.

But its over now Umineko... i hope.
KetuekigamiFeb 3, 2009 9:10 PM
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines.
Feb 3, 2009 9:29 PM
Offline
Mar 2008
686
I'll say it in the simpliest way: fanboys. That's the reason for this high score, same applies for TTGL and Code Geass. (In CG and this case, apply the high scores related to the prequels, as explained before)
Feb 3, 2009 9:32 PM

Offline
Dec 2007
6641
Wishy said:
I'll say it in the simpliest way: fanboys. That's the reason for this high score, same applies for TTGL and Code Geass. (In CG and this case, apply the high scores related to the prequels, as explained before)
you still havnt seen it yet so pleas stop making assumptions. you dont know if it does or doesnt deserve a high score. And the score seems to keep going up even now so since its after the point where only the "fan boys" and where more non fans are rating it please just shut up.
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines.
Feb 3, 2009 9:43 PM

Offline
Sep 2007
2551
Wishy said:
I'll say it in the simpliest way: fanboys. That's the reason for this high score, same applies for TTGL and Code Geass. (In CG and this case, apply the high scores related to the prequels, as explained before)

Well that's true, but the same thing applies for every series. Things don't get highly rated without fans. That's just the nature of ratings.

If anything, you should be blaming the fact that it's been split into seven parts. If it was all combined properly into one series, it wouldn't stand a chance at getting the top position.
Feb 3, 2009 10:13 PM
Offline
Mar 2008
686
I've said that lots of times, but Ketuekigami doesn't seem to understand. What I mean with fanboys, anyway, is people that keep saying "this is the best" like retardeds. They can only use to arguments: "You haven't watched it." or "You don't understand it.", in this case we just get the first one, and then when we watch the movies and keep saying "this is over-rated", we gonna get that we are idiots.

Just take a look, after 140 posts Katue still hasn't understand the prequels stuff. :<

Anyway, I'll say it again, I'm not discussing that this movie is great, I'm really looking forward to it, but as I said 100 posts before this one, that this movie is epic or not doesn't change the fact that it is high scored because what has been explained several times before.
Feb 3, 2009 10:26 PM

Offline
Sep 2007
2551
Wishy said:
They can only use to arguments: "You haven't watched it." or "You don't understand it.", in this case we just get the first one, and then when we watch the movies and keep saying "this is over-rated", we gonna get that we are idiots.

It was like that for a while, but he starts making sense if you're patient enough.

Honestly though, you really should, you know... actually watch it. Then you can start making some legitimate complaints.
Feb 3, 2009 10:27 PM

Offline
Dec 2007
6641
no, i understand what you mean about scores... but the way your wording your posts makes it sound like your saying that it doesnt deserve a high score. thats how your original post sounded and thats how that post sounded.

And so if someone says "its the best" there a retard? i think thats a pretty stupid way to look at it. And yes, i am allowed to use the "you havnt seen it" argument because if anything it is the most valid argument.

All im saying is stop posting in a way that sounds like your complaining about the score until you see it. for all you know it deserves its score.
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines.
Feb 4, 2009 12:39 AM

Offline
Oct 2008
958
Let me just pop in a "quick" comment here. I don't believe that this is the work of fanboys.

Exhibit A: Compare the score of this to the other KnK movies. Can fanboys really be this spread out?

Exhibit B: I had yet to give a KnK movie a 10 before this one. The impression it made on me was astounding. Everything from the soundtrack to the storyline pulled me in unlike any of the other KnK movies had. After watching #1, I decided to continue because the animation was so good, and I'm glad I did, if only for #5. In my opinion, #5 put together what the previous 4 lacked individually:



Feb 4, 2009 1:01 AM

Offline
Jul 2007
2780
Just to say something about Touko.
In the movie it was mentioned that Touko was able to create a perfect puppet of herself only ONCE in her whole life. Which as Ketue sayed doesnt sounds as the easiest thing to do and it give us doubts if she can do it again. So Touko is everything but invisible. Even the second time she went to the aprtment complex and killed Alba if she fought Araya she would be dead for sure. So its like Touko had 2 lives. She was killed once she has no second chance for years now. And we dont even know id shes able to make a puppet like that again...
Feb 4, 2009 1:12 AM

Offline
Sep 2007
2551
I guess we'll see. Either way, extra lives are pretty lame in general. One was enough to irritate me.
Feb 4, 2009 1:16 AM

Offline
Dec 2007
6641
meonlyme775 said:
Let me just pop in a "quick" comment here. I don't believe that this is the work of fanboys.

Exhibit A: Compare the score of this to the other KnK movies. Can fanboys really be this spread out?

Exhibit B: I had yet to give a KnK movie a 10 before this one. The impression it made on me was astounding. Everything from the soundtrack to the storyline pulled me in unlike any of the other KnK movies had. After watching #1, I decided to continue because the animation was so good, and I'm glad I did, if only for #5. In my opinion, #5 put together what the previous 4 lacked individually:




omg thats the smartest thing enyone has said so far XD

quoted so its not lost in the thread*
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines.
Feb 4, 2009 1:39 AM

Offline
Jul 2008
427
naikou said:
I guess we'll see. Either way, extra lives are pretty lame in general. One was enough to irritate me.



^
Avoid



Feb 4, 2009 6:39 AM

Offline
May 2008
1084
Do we need to watch the previous movies to understand this one ?
Feb 4, 2009 6:49 AM

Offline
Jan 2008
486
Soulstrider said:
Do we need to watch the previous movies to understand this one ?


You definitely have to. As it says, it's the 5th movie of a franchise.
Feb 4, 2009 8:14 AM

Offline
Dec 2007
1155
Wishy said:
I'll say it in the simpliest way: fanboys. That's the reason for this high score, same applies for TTGL and Code Geass. (In CG and this case, apply the high scores related to the prequels, as explained before)


Why the hell do you even keep posting about there score in this thread? Watch the movie, then discuss the score. Just shut up otherwise -_-
yakisobapanFeb 4, 2009 8:24 AM
Feb 4, 2009 10:07 AM

Offline
Jun 2008
13
dxthegreat said:
naikou said:
I guess we'll see. Either way, extra lives are pretty lame in general. One was enough to irritate me.



^
Avoid



uahuhauahuaha rotflol - epic XD
Feb 4, 2009 10:22 AM

Offline
Sep 2007
2551
Keep that thing away from me. I'll break into hives.
Feb 4, 2009 2:48 PM

Offline
Apr 2007
846
As if this series couldn't get any more awesome. I have to admit I feel thoroughly dumb and that I'll definitely need to watch this movie a couple more times to completely get it. Or maybe I won't completely get it. Maybe not until all of the pieces are out, maybe... well, never. But it was still so amazing, captivating, interesting, shocking, and just...

It was really damn good.
MaxwellLilyFeb 4, 2009 3:01 PM
Feb 5, 2009 5:51 PM

Offline
Jul 2008
256
It was just...WOW!

I LOVED the way the plotted out the story and how they arranged the scenes. REALLY, that sort of hurt my brain trying to grasp the ideas all at once but the sheer brilliance of everything paid back well. It had many little details that made it even better! Some of the repetition got a little confusing, but the details and well thought explanations by the characters made everything good. :]

The action scenes were pretty good as usual, but a huge bonus was seeing Touko fight. Her character really shone in this movie and I loved it! It wows me to how they made Touko "non-killable".

I think what really topped this movie off with a great ending was Shiki's blush. Was it just me or did anyone else find that so innocently cute? xD

Again, I must say that this movie was as awesome, or maybe even more awesome than I expected it to be! Seriously; props to the people that made this movie possible.
Bleed for me.

Pages (11) « 1 2 [3] 4 5 » ... Last »

More topics from this board

» OMG FIRST PLACE ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )

5layer - Feb 2, 2009

963 by Zoshlog »»
Mar 14, 12:59 PM

» why peaple gave this episode low rate to be lower than it deserve? this episode is masterpiece

RCvvvv - Sep 17, 2022

17 by Phloup »»
Sep 17, 2022 4:03 PM

Poll: » which is the best ost from ufotable

filthyfrank8142 - Feb 4, 2022

6 by JJxy »»
Mar 29, 2022 5:58 AM

» best plot twist in anime history?

sabervergarden - Feb 12, 2021

10 by asaryo420 »»
Feb 4, 2022 11:59 PM

» Am I the only one who doesn't like Kokutou?

Albee98 - Sep 24, 2021

9 by 234Mannan »»
Oct 20, 2021 10:06 AM
It’s time to ditch the text file.
Keep track of your anime easily by creating your own list.
Sign Up Login