Report bigswag's Profile


Anime Stats
Days: 43.2
Mean Score: 0.00
  • Total Entries254
  • Rewatched0
  • Episodes2,570
Anime History Last Anime Updates
Kimetsu no Yaiba
Kimetsu no Yaiba
Sep 29, 3:59 AM
Watching -/26 · Scored -
Shingeki no Kyojin Season 3 Part 2
Shingeki no Kyojin Season 3 Part 2
Aug 23, 1:07 AM
Completed 10/10 · Scored -
Danna ga Nani wo Itteiru ka Wakaranai Ken
Danna ga Nani wo Itteiru ka Wakaranai Ken
Aug 18, 4:01 PM
Completed 13/13 · Scored -
Manga Stats
Days: 0.0
Mean Score: 0.00
  • Total Entries0
  • Reread0
  • Chapters0
  • Volumes0
Manga History Last Manga Updates

No updates yet.


All Comments (4) Comments

Would you like to post a comment? Please login or sign up first!
romagia Jan 13, 2016 4:08 AM
romagia Jan 12, 2016 2:41 AM
Eh, me neither, but i can make a guess

Treacherous = 1. guilty of or involving betrayal or deception 2. hazardous because of presenting hidden or unpredictable dangers.
Treacherous through calculations = deliberately treacherous
Treacherous through weakness = unintentionally treacherous

=> We are often more treacherous through weakness than through calculations

I believe the gnome children are in a members only area from the old runescape ( see ), and they might not be that popular in the runescape community.

The first time i heard of it was through this pic:
which is a variation of this comic:
romagia Jan 11, 2016 7:15 AM
Yeh there aren't many people who know me outside of my forum posts..

Yes, it's from Runescape, but i don't know if the gnome child actually says that. The character itself is pretty famous on various areas of the internet (see: ). I believe that even in game he had some interesting quotes, paired with the derpy look, made him more popular.

The picture i use for my signature is a tumblr link from google images; i picked it more because it already fits MAL's requirements for signature size than the quote itself.. And btw.. what makes the quote funny for you? Is it just the absurdity of a gnome child saying a vaguely philosophical sentence, or do you see something more?