New
Mar 16, 2023 10:42 AM
#1
| Before Goku went off to the tournament of power I forgot who it was but they was telling Goku about uub who's the reincarnation of Buu and how they wanted Goku to train him. Well super finished obviously and super broly and the last movie which are follow ups came out and they didn't even mention him again. Is it possible Akira forgot? I hope not man I thought that could've been cool. |
Mar 16, 2023 10:51 AM
#2
| Uub is after super is between dbz and the ending of it when they're all old |
Mar 16, 2023 10:54 AM
#3
K7N6 said: Before Goku went off to the tournament of power I forgot who it was but they was telling Goku about uub who's the reincarnation of Buu and how they wanted Goku to train him. Well super finished obviously and super broly and the last movie which are follow ups came out and they didn't even mention him again. Is it possible Akira forgot? I hope not man I thought that could've been cool. I don't think he's forgotten yet. If I remember correctly Goku didn't meet uub till the very end of Z during the time skip after buu's defeat. The events of Super take place between the defeat of Buu and the time skip. So it's only a matter of time before they introduce him again. |
Mar 16, 2023 11:02 AM
#4
K7N6 said: Before Goku went off to the tournament of power I forgot who it was but they was telling Goku about uub who's the reincarnation of Buu and how they wanted Goku to train him. Well super finished obviously and super broly and the last movie which are follow ups came out and they didn't even mention him again. Is it possible Akira forgot? I hope not man I thought that could've been cool. In the DBS manga he appeared during Moro arc so yeah we will definitely see him again in the future. |
Mar 16, 2023 11:02 AM
#5
K7N6 said: Before Goku went off to the tournament of power I forgot who it was but they was telling Goku about uub who's the reincarnation of Buu and how they wanted Goku to train him. Well super finished obviously and super broly and the last movie which are follow ups came out and they didn't even mention him again. Is it possible Akira forgot? I hope not man I thought that could've been cool. If I remember correctly, Uub has an appearance in the manga of dragon ball super. |
Mar 16, 2023 11:05 AM
#6
| You need to remember that Super is NOT a sequel to Z, it's a midquel. The entirety of Super takes place before the end of Z and therefore before Goku meets Uub. I know a lot of people tend to forget about the arc after Majin Buu, but there was a 10 year time skip there and that's where Super is set. |
Mar 16, 2023 11:53 AM
#7
| Just wait till season 2…. (If that ever even happens at this point…) |
Mar 16, 2023 4:57 PM
#8
| Because Uub is still a baby or a child at DBS. now in Movie Pan recently it's kindergarten so it's just a matter of time. |
Mar 16, 2023 6:06 PM
#9
| in dragon ball gt they do🗿 |
Mar 16, 2023 10:22 PM
#10
| they probably will but the reasoning could be as simple as the fact that dragon ball super sucks |
Mar 16, 2023 10:57 PM
#11
| They did not forget about uub he appears in the manga. In the moro arc i.e.,The very next arc after end of super anime |
Mar 17, 2023 3:09 AM
#12
| Because dragonball super isn’t canon, we aren’t going to see much of uub like that. |
Mar 17, 2023 9:49 AM
#13
RequiemLo64 said: Because dragonball super isn’t canon, we aren’t going to see much of uub like that. It's quite the opposite, Dragon Ball Super it's the canon follow up of the story after Majin Buu, so you can be sure to see him, in the he already appeared |
Mar 17, 2023 9:59 AM
#14
Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Because dragonball super isn’t canon, we aren’t going to see much of uub like that. It's quite the opposite, Dragon Ball Super it's the canon follow up of the story after Majin Buu, so you can be sure to see him, in the he already appeared We already got a follow up story according to akira toriyama if you read wsj, his words not mine, “"I thought, 'Man, I really made everyone old' ... I even gave Vegeta a mustache” after that he just explains the placement for super, like I said not canon, however it has its own canonicity, just not to the rest of the series, you can’t really expect people to believe this series is canon after the many retcons and shit 🎪 |
Mar 17, 2023 10:50 AM
#15
RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Because dragonball super isn’t canon, we aren’t going to see much of uub like that. It's quite the opposite, Dragon Ball Super it's the canon follow up of the story after Majin Buu, so you can be sure to see him, in the he already appeared We already got a follow up story according to akira toriyama if you read wsj, his words not mine, “"I thought, 'Man, I really made everyone old' ... I even gave Vegeta a mustache” after that he just explains the placement for super, like I said not canon, however it has its own canonicity, just not to the rest of the series, you can’t really expect people to believe this series is canon after the many retcons and shit 🎪 That mustached Vegeta, it's not canon, just think about it, Tori came to work in Dragon Ball franchise just now after the conclusion of the manga series, Super Hero it's clearly a story written by Tori and he is also the one who wrote the canon stories that started the series again, Battle of Gods and Resurrection of F. Not to mention the fact that Tori it's chief editor of Toyotaro |
Mar 17, 2023 10:56 AM
#16
Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Because dragonball super isn’t canon, we aren’t going to see much of uub like that. It's quite the opposite, Dragon Ball Super it's the canon follow up of the story after Majin Buu, so you can be sure to see him, in the he already appeared We already got a follow up story according to akira toriyama if you read wsj, his words not mine, “"I thought, 'Man, I really made everyone old' ... I even gave Vegeta a mustache” after that he just explains the placement for super, like I said not canon, however it has its own canonicity, just not to the rest of the series, you can’t really expect people to believe this series is canon after the many retcons and shit 🎪 That mustached Vegeta, it's not canon, just think about it, Tori came to work in Dragon Ball franchise just now after the conclusion of the manga series, Super Hero it's clearly a story written by Tori and he is also the one who wrote the canon stories that started the series again, Battle of Gods and Resurrection of F. Not to mention the fact that Tori it's chief editor of Toyotaro So we just gonna ignore it’s a series toriyama oversaw and created, everything you said that’s canon is only canon to dragonball super, think about it, they ended the stories so many times just for them to make a series after a dragonball movie does #’s in the theaters yeah, retcons, downgrades, the first few arcs were retellings from movies, yeah no that shit ain’t canon to the rest of dragonball, your movie argument also confirms that cause what other dragonball movie is canon to dragonball? Only a series within the franchise could do that so it’s not canon to dragonball, Gt is canon, super isn’t, go about your day pal :) |
Mar 17, 2023 11:17 AM
#17
RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Because dragonball super isn’t canon, we aren’t going to see much of uub like that. It's quite the opposite, Dragon Ball Super it's the canon follow up of the story after Majin Buu, so you can be sure to see him, in the he already appeared We already got a follow up story according to akira toriyama if you read wsj, his words not mine, “"I thought, 'Man, I really made everyone old' ... I even gave Vegeta a mustache” after that he just explains the placement for super, like I said not canon, however it has its own canonicity, just not to the rest of the series, you can’t really expect people to believe this series is canon after the many retcons and shit 🎪 That mustached Vegeta, it's not canon, just think about it, Tori came to work in Dragon Ball franchise just now after the conclusion of the manga series, Super Hero it's clearly a story written by Tori and he is also the one who wrote the canon stories that started the series again, Battle of Gods and Resurrection of F. Not to mention the fact that Tori it's chief editor of Toyotaro So we just gonna ignore it’s a series toriyama oversaw and created, everything you said that’s canon is only canon to dragonball super, think about it, they ended the stories so many times just for them to make a series after a dragonball movie does #’s in the theaters yeah, retcons, downgrades, the first few arcs were retellings from movies, yeah no that shit ain’t canon to the rest of dragonball, your movie argument also confirms that cause what other dragonball movie is canon to dragonball? Only a series within the franchise could do that so it’s not canon to dragonball, Gt is canon, super isn’t, go about your day pal :) It's you who's wrong, even Toriyama said GT it's more like a spinoff series, something that could happen or couldn't, even Dragon Ball Room don't want talk about GT, not only because it's not the follow up of the original story, not only because what happened in the series rewrote half of Dragon Ball story, but because it was a bad show. So, if in 2023, Shueisha says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, Toriyama says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, Toyotaro says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, the Dragon Ball Room says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, all the people who works on Dragon Ball stories says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, it means that Dragon Ball Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, you like it or not |
Mar 17, 2023 1:00 PM
#18
Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Because dragonball super isn’t canon, we aren’t going to see much of uub like that. It's quite the opposite, Dragon Ball Super it's the canon follow up of the story after Majin Buu, so you can be sure to see him, in the he already appeared We already got a follow up story according to akira toriyama if you read wsj, his words not mine, “"I thought, 'Man, I really made everyone old' ... I even gave Vegeta a mustache” after that he just explains the placement for super, like I said not canon, however it has its own canonicity, just not to the rest of the series, you can’t really expect people to believe this series is canon after the many retcons and shit 🎪 That mustached Vegeta, it's not canon, just think about it, Tori came to work in Dragon Ball franchise just now after the conclusion of the manga series, Super Hero it's clearly a story written by Tori and he is also the one who wrote the canon stories that started the series again, Battle of Gods and Resurrection of F. Not to mention the fact that Tori it's chief editor of Toyotaro So we just gonna ignore it’s a series toriyama oversaw and created, everything you said that’s canon is only canon to dragonball super, think about it, they ended the stories so many times just for them to make a series after a dragonball movie does #’s in the theaters yeah, retcons, downgrades, the first few arcs were retellings from movies, yeah no that shit ain’t canon to the rest of dragonball, your movie argument also confirms that cause what other dragonball movie is canon to dragonball? Only a series within the franchise could do that so it’s not canon to dragonball, Gt is canon, super isn’t, go about your day pal :) It's you who's wrong, even Toriyama said GT it's more like a spinoff series, something that could happen or couldn't, even Dragon Ball Room don't want talk about GT, not only because it's not the follow up of the original story, not only because what happened in the series rewrote half of Dragon Ball story, but because it was a bad show. So, if in 2023, Shueisha says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, Toriyama says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, Toyotaro says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, the Dragon Ball Room says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, all the people who works on Dragon Ball stories says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, it means that Dragon Ball Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, you like it or not Toriyama been said it was canon, he made it so it’s his call not the fans and most definitely not yours or anyone else’s bud but you’re gonna ignore that cause of personal bias, grow up, the info’s right in front of you, ignorance is bliss I guess, super is not canon to the main story, whether *YOU* want it to be or not or like it or not, he ain’t just gonna say what he created years ago isn’t canon because it’s not good, what kind of sense does that make? He chose to write a different story set after the buu saga and went from there, if it isn’t clear that you’re wrong then that says more about you than anything else. Go on about your day bud :) |
Mar 17, 2023 1:25 PM
#19
RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Because dragonball super isn’t canon, we aren’t going to see much of uub like that. It's quite the opposite, Dragon Ball Super it's the canon follow up of the story after Majin Buu, so you can be sure to see him, in the he already appeared We already got a follow up story according to akira toriyama if you read wsj, his words not mine, “"I thought, 'Man, I really made everyone old' ... I even gave Vegeta a mustache” after that he just explains the placement for super, like I said not canon, however it has its own canonicity, just not to the rest of the series, you can’t really expect people to believe this series is canon after the many retcons and shit 🎪 That mustached Vegeta, it's not canon, just think about it, Tori came to work in Dragon Ball franchise just now after the conclusion of the manga series, Super Hero it's clearly a story written by Tori and he is also the one who wrote the canon stories that started the series again, Battle of Gods and Resurrection of F. Not to mention the fact that Tori it's chief editor of Toyotaro So we just gonna ignore it’s a series toriyama oversaw and created, everything you said that’s canon is only canon to dragonball super, think about it, they ended the stories so many times just for them to make a series after a dragonball movie does #’s in the theaters yeah, retcons, downgrades, the first few arcs were retellings from movies, yeah no that shit ain’t canon to the rest of dragonball, your movie argument also confirms that cause what other dragonball movie is canon to dragonball? Only a series within the franchise could do that so it’s not canon to dragonball, Gt is canon, super isn’t, go about your day pal :) It's you who's wrong, even Toriyama said GT it's more like a spinoff series, something that could happen or couldn't, even Dragon Ball Room don't want talk about GT, not only because it's not the follow up of the original story, not only because what happened in the series rewrote half of Dragon Ball story, but because it was a bad show. So, if in 2023, Shueisha says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, Toriyama says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, Toyotaro says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, the Dragon Ball Room says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, all the people who works on Dragon Ball stories says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, it means that Dragon Ball Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, you like it or not Toriyama been said it was canon, he made it so it’s his call not the fans and most definitely not yours or anyone else’s bud but you’re gonna ignore that cause of personal bias, grow up, the info’s right in front of you, ignorance is bliss I guess, super is not canon to the main story, whether *YOU* want it to be or not or like it or not, he ain’t just gonna say what he created years ago isn’t canon because it’s not good, what kind of sense does that make? He chose to write a different story set after the buu saga and went from there, if it isn’t clear that you’re wrong then that says more about you than anything else. Go on about your day bud :) So you're telling that you are gonna ignore the fact that everyone, E V E R Y O N E, and when I say everyone I mean it, knows that Super is the continuation of Dragon Ball Z, and I'm not talking of the source material because the comic doesn't have and doesn't need a sequel, to continue to think that GT, that's know to be a spinoff, a side story, is the real sequel? Sorry to tell you that, but I think you're the only one who remained in the 2000, plus the rest of the people would not change just because someone wrote that on MyAnimeList |
Mar 17, 2023 2:27 PM
#20
Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Because dragonball super isn’t canon, we aren’t going to see much of uub like that. It's quite the opposite, Dragon Ball Super it's the canon follow up of the story after Majin Buu, so you can be sure to see him, in the he already appeared We already got a follow up story according to akira toriyama if you read wsj, his words not mine, “"I thought, 'Man, I really made everyone old' ... I even gave Vegeta a mustache” after that he just explains the placement for super, like I said not canon, however it has its own canonicity, just not to the rest of the series, you can’t really expect people to believe this series is canon after the many retcons and shit 🎪 That mustached Vegeta, it's not canon, just think about it, Tori came to work in Dragon Ball franchise just now after the conclusion of the manga series, Super Hero it's clearly a story written by Tori and he is also the one who wrote the canon stories that started the series again, Battle of Gods and Resurrection of F. Not to mention the fact that Tori it's chief editor of Toyotaro So we just gonna ignore it’s a series toriyama oversaw and created, everything you said that’s canon is only canon to dragonball super, think about it, they ended the stories so many times just for them to make a series after a dragonball movie does #’s in the theaters yeah, retcons, downgrades, the first few arcs were retellings from movies, yeah no that shit ain’t canon to the rest of dragonball, your movie argument also confirms that cause what other dragonball movie is canon to dragonball? Only a series within the franchise could do that so it’s not canon to dragonball, Gt is canon, super isn’t, go about your day pal :) It's you who's wrong, even Toriyama said GT it's more like a spinoff series, something that could happen or couldn't, even Dragon Ball Room don't want talk about GT, not only because it's not the follow up of the original story, not only because what happened in the series rewrote half of Dragon Ball story, but because it was a bad show. So, if in 2023, Shueisha says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, Toriyama says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, Toyotaro says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, the Dragon Ball Room says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, all the people who works on Dragon Ball stories says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, it means that Dragon Ball Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, you like it or not Toriyama been said it was canon, he made it so it’s his call not the fans and most definitely not yours or anyone else’s bud but you’re gonna ignore that cause of personal bias, grow up, the info’s right in front of you, ignorance is bliss I guess, super is not canon to the main story, whether *YOU* want it to be or not or like it or not, he ain’t just gonna say what he created years ago isn’t canon because it’s not good, what kind of sense does that make? He chose to write a different story set after the buu saga and went from there, if it isn’t clear that you’re wrong then that says more about you than anything else. Go on about your day bud :) So you're telling that you are gonna ignore the fact that everyone, E V E R Y O N E, and when I say everyone I mean it, knows that Super is the continuation of Dragon Ball Z, and I'm not talking of the source material because the comic doesn't have and doesn't need a sequel, to continue to think that GT, that's know to be a spinoff, a side story, is the real sequel? Sorry to tell you that, but I think you're the only one who remained in the 2000, plus the rest of the people would not change just because someone wrote that on MyAnimeList You say everyone like everyone watches anime, you say everyone like you have a huge backing? You say everyone as in the fandom itself is gonna agree with you, I stayed in the 2000? You’re staying in Delusional world, when you look at the two series, ask the fandom which is more like dragonball, GT? super? This so called everyone. E V E R Y O N E regardless if they liked it or not will say GT I promise you, if it was side story it would’ve gone in a different direction like super did, at least GT A.T oversaw production and was involved more with his creation ha saying you know what you take over but I’ll step in when we’re shooting for bags💰 (movies) which is even more of a reason why it’s not canon cause if it’s not a movie or big decision in the manga he don’t even touch it, I can’t say that for GT, finally you gotta look at it this way, if A.T had ever said this garbage was canon, it’s only cause that’s his job not him, anyone who looks into the guy knows that so hop hop bud you’re not him |
Mar 17, 2023 2:35 PM
#21
RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Because dragonball super isn’t canon, we aren’t going to see much of uub like that. It's quite the opposite, Dragon Ball Super it's the canon follow up of the story after Majin Buu, so you can be sure to see him, in the he already appeared We already got a follow up story according to akira toriyama if you read wsj, his words not mine, “"I thought, 'Man, I really made everyone old' ... I even gave Vegeta a mustache” after that he just explains the placement for super, like I said not canon, however it has its own canonicity, just not to the rest of the series, you can’t really expect people to believe this series is canon after the many retcons and shit 🎪 That mustached Vegeta, it's not canon, just think about it, Tori came to work in Dragon Ball franchise just now after the conclusion of the manga series, Super Hero it's clearly a story written by Tori and he is also the one who wrote the canon stories that started the series again, Battle of Gods and Resurrection of F. Not to mention the fact that Tori it's chief editor of Toyotaro So we just gonna ignore it’s a series toriyama oversaw and created, everything you said that’s canon is only canon to dragonball super, think about it, they ended the stories so many times just for them to make a series after a dragonball movie does #’s in the theaters yeah, retcons, downgrades, the first few arcs were retellings from movies, yeah no that shit ain’t canon to the rest of dragonball, your movie argument also confirms that cause what other dragonball movie is canon to dragonball? Only a series within the franchise could do that so it’s not canon to dragonball, Gt is canon, super isn’t, go about your day pal :) It's you who's wrong, even Toriyama said GT it's more like a spinoff series, something that could happen or couldn't, even Dragon Ball Room don't want talk about GT, not only because it's not the follow up of the original story, not only because what happened in the series rewrote half of Dragon Ball story, but because it was a bad show. So, if in 2023, Shueisha says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, Toriyama says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, Toyotaro says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, the Dragon Ball Room says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, all the people who works on Dragon Ball stories says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, it means that Dragon Ball Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, you like it or not Toriyama been said it was canon, he made it so it’s his call not the fans and most definitely not yours or anyone else’s bud but you’re gonna ignore that cause of personal bias, grow up, the info’s right in front of you, ignorance is bliss I guess, super is not canon to the main story, whether *YOU* want it to be or not or like it or not, he ain’t just gonna say what he created years ago isn’t canon because it’s not good, what kind of sense does that make? He chose to write a different story set after the buu saga and went from there, if it isn’t clear that you’re wrong then that says more about you than anything else. Go on about your day bud :) So you're telling that you are gonna ignore the fact that everyone, E V E R Y O N E, and when I say everyone I mean it, knows that Super is the continuation of Dragon Ball Z, and I'm not talking of the source material because the comic doesn't have and doesn't need a sequel, to continue to think that GT, that's know to be a spinoff, a side story, is the real sequel? Sorry to tell you that, but I think you're the only one who remained in the 2000, plus the rest of the people would not change just because someone wrote that on MyAnimeList You say everyone like everyone watches anime, you say everyone like you have a huge backing? You say everyone as in the fandom itself is gonna agree with you, I stayed in the 2000? You’re staying in Delusional world, when you look at the two series, ask the fandom which is more like dragonball, GT? super? This so called everyone. E V E R Y O N E regardless if they liked it or not will say GT I promise you, if it was side story it would’ve gone in a different direction like super did, at least GT A.T oversaw production and was involved more with his creation ha saying you know what you take over but I’ll step in when we’re shooting for bags💰 (movies) which is even more of a reason why it’s not canon cause if it’s not a movie or big decision in the manga he don’t even touch it, I can’t say that for GT, finally you gotta look at it this way, if A.T had ever said this garbage was canon, it’s only cause that’s his job not him, anyone who looks into the guy knows that so hop hop bud you’re not him Thanks, I know, I'm not Toriyama, plus the things I'm talking about happened in the last three/four years, instead of you, that's talking about 20 years old interviews. Last, you are also not Tori, so please try to bring suitable arguments instead of saying "GT it's canon because i like it, Super it's not canon because no" |
Mar 17, 2023 2:39 PM
#22
Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Because dragonball super isn’t canon, we aren’t going to see much of uub like that. It's quite the opposite, Dragon Ball Super it's the canon follow up of the story after Majin Buu, so you can be sure to see him, in the he already appeared We already got a follow up story according to akira toriyama if you read wsj, his words not mine, “"I thought, 'Man, I really made everyone old' ... I even gave Vegeta a mustache” after that he just explains the placement for super, like I said not canon, however it has its own canonicity, just not to the rest of the series, you can’t really expect people to believe this series is canon after the many retcons and shit 🎪 That mustached Vegeta, it's not canon, just think about it, Tori came to work in Dragon Ball franchise just now after the conclusion of the manga series, Super Hero it's clearly a story written by Tori and he is also the one who wrote the canon stories that started the series again, Battle of Gods and Resurrection of F. Not to mention the fact that Tori it's chief editor of Toyotaro So we just gonna ignore it’s a series toriyama oversaw and created, everything you said that’s canon is only canon to dragonball super, think about it, they ended the stories so many times just for them to make a series after a dragonball movie does #’s in the theaters yeah, retcons, downgrades, the first few arcs were retellings from movies, yeah no that shit ain’t canon to the rest of dragonball, your movie argument also confirms that cause what other dragonball movie is canon to dragonball? Only a series within the franchise could do that so it’s not canon to dragonball, Gt is canon, super isn’t, go about your day pal :) It's you who's wrong, even Toriyama said GT it's more like a spinoff series, something that could happen or couldn't, even Dragon Ball Room don't want talk about GT, not only because it's not the follow up of the original story, not only because what happened in the series rewrote half of Dragon Ball story, but because it was a bad show. So, if in 2023, Shueisha says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, Toriyama says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, Toyotaro says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, the Dragon Ball Room says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, all the people who works on Dragon Ball stories says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, it means that Dragon Ball Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, you like it or not Toriyama been said it was canon, he made it so it’s his call not the fans and most definitely not yours or anyone else’s bud but you’re gonna ignore that cause of personal bias, grow up, the info’s right in front of you, ignorance is bliss I guess, super is not canon to the main story, whether *YOU* want it to be or not or like it or not, he ain’t just gonna say what he created years ago isn’t canon because it’s not good, what kind of sense does that make? He chose to write a different story set after the buu saga and went from there, if it isn’t clear that you’re wrong then that says more about you than anything else. Go on about your day bud :) So you're telling that you are gonna ignore the fact that everyone, E V E R Y O N E, and when I say everyone I mean it, knows that Super is the continuation of Dragon Ball Z, and I'm not talking of the source material because the comic doesn't have and doesn't need a sequel, to continue to think that GT, that's know to be a spinoff, a side story, is the real sequel? Sorry to tell you that, but I think you're the only one who remained in the 2000, plus the rest of the people would not change just because someone wrote that on MyAnimeList You say everyone like everyone watches anime, you say everyone like you have a huge backing? You say everyone as in the fandom itself is gonna agree with you, I stayed in the 2000? You’re staying in Delusional world, when you look at the two series, ask the fandom which is more like dragonball, GT? super? This so called everyone. E V E R Y O N E regardless if they liked it or not will say GT I promise you, if it was side story it would’ve gone in a different direction like super did, at least GT A.T oversaw production and was involved more with his creation ha saying you know what you take over but I’ll step in when we’re shooting for bags💰 (movies) which is even more of a reason why it’s not canon cause if it’s not a movie or big decision in the manga he don’t even touch it, I can’t say that for GT, finally you gotta look at it this way, if A.T had ever said this garbage was canon, it’s only cause that’s his job not him, anyone who looks into the guy knows that so hop hop bud you’re not him Thanks, I know, I'm not Toriyama, plus the things I'm talking about happened in the last three/four years, instead of you, that's talking about 20 years old interviews. Last, you are also not Tori, so please try to bring suitable arguments instead of saying "GT it's canon because i like it, Super it's not canon because no" See that’s the thing I never mentioned anything about perineal bias such as I like it or super is better because xx or yy I just mentioned differences f involvement, and most important the faithfulness of the story that makes dragonball…..well dragonball, so I think I’m being very suitable with my arguments and yes neither of us are A.T please keep some semblance of commons sense in your arguments. |
Mar 17, 2023 2:47 PM
#23
RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Because dragonball super isn’t canon, we aren’t going to see much of uub like that. It's quite the opposite, Dragon Ball Super it's the canon follow up of the story after Majin Buu, so you can be sure to see him, in the he already appeared We already got a follow up story according to akira toriyama if you read wsj, his words not mine, “"I thought, 'Man, I really made everyone old' ... I even gave Vegeta a mustache” after that he just explains the placement for super, like I said not canon, however it has its own canonicity, just not to the rest of the series, you can’t really expect people to believe this series is canon after the many retcons and shit 🎪 That mustached Vegeta, it's not canon, just think about it, Tori came to work in Dragon Ball franchise just now after the conclusion of the manga series, Super Hero it's clearly a story written by Tori and he is also the one who wrote the canon stories that started the series again, Battle of Gods and Resurrection of F. Not to mention the fact that Tori it's chief editor of Toyotaro So we just gonna ignore it’s a series toriyama oversaw and created, everything you said that’s canon is only canon to dragonball super, think about it, they ended the stories so many times just for them to make a series after a dragonball movie does #’s in the theaters yeah, retcons, downgrades, the first few arcs were retellings from movies, yeah no that shit ain’t canon to the rest of dragonball, your movie argument also confirms that cause what other dragonball movie is canon to dragonball? Only a series within the franchise could do that so it’s not canon to dragonball, Gt is canon, super isn’t, go about your day pal :) It's you who's wrong, even Toriyama said GT it's more like a spinoff series, something that could happen or couldn't, even Dragon Ball Room don't want talk about GT, not only because it's not the follow up of the original story, not only because what happened in the series rewrote half of Dragon Ball story, but because it was a bad show. So, if in 2023, Shueisha says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, Toriyama says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, Toyotaro says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, the Dragon Ball Room says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, all the people who works on Dragon Ball stories says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, it means that Dragon Ball Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, you like it or not Toriyama been said it was canon, he made it so it’s his call not the fans and most definitely not yours or anyone else’s bud but you’re gonna ignore that cause of personal bias, grow up, the info’s right in front of you, ignorance is bliss I guess, super is not canon to the main story, whether *YOU* want it to be or not or like it or not, he ain’t just gonna say what he created years ago isn’t canon because it’s not good, what kind of sense does that make? He chose to write a different story set after the buu saga and went from there, if it isn’t clear that you’re wrong then that says more about you than anything else. Go on about your day bud :) So you're telling that you are gonna ignore the fact that everyone, E V E R Y O N E, and when I say everyone I mean it, knows that Super is the continuation of Dragon Ball Z, and I'm not talking of the source material because the comic doesn't have and doesn't need a sequel, to continue to think that GT, that's know to be a spinoff, a side story, is the real sequel? Sorry to tell you that, but I think you're the only one who remained in the 2000, plus the rest of the people would not change just because someone wrote that on MyAnimeList You say everyone like everyone watches anime, you say everyone like you have a huge backing? You say everyone as in the fandom itself is gonna agree with you, I stayed in the 2000? You’re staying in Delusional world, when you look at the two series, ask the fandom which is more like dragonball, GT? super? This so called everyone. E V E R Y O N E regardless if they liked it or not will say GT I promise you, if it was side story it would’ve gone in a different direction like super did, at least GT A.T oversaw production and was involved more with his creation ha saying you know what you take over but I’ll step in when we’re shooting for bags💰 (movies) which is even more of a reason why it’s not canon cause if it’s not a movie or big decision in the manga he don’t even touch it, I can’t say that for GT, finally you gotta look at it this way, if A.T had ever said this garbage was canon, it’s only cause that’s his job not him, anyone who looks into the guy knows that so hop hop bud you’re not him Thanks, I know, I'm not Toriyama, plus the things I'm talking about happened in the last three/four years, instead of you, that's talking about 20 years old interviews. Last, you are also not Tori, so please try to bring suitable arguments instead of saying "GT it's canon because i like it, Super it's not canon because no" See that’s the thing I never mentioned anything about perineal bias such as I like it or super is better because xx or yy I just mentioned differences f involvement, and most important the faithfulness of the story that makes dragonball…..well dragonball, so I think I’m being very suitable with my arguments and yes neither of us are A.T please keep some semblance of commons sense in your arguments. Wait, do you really think that GT it's faithfull? GT? The story where a giant golden monkey appears because the people who worked on GT also worked on Dragon Ball Z and they put the previously mentioned golden monkey, that doesn't exist in the manga, in Dragon Ball GT? Not mention that the golden monkey evolve into a furry with black and red hairs instead of the classic golden color. Man, I don't like Super Saiyan God or Blue but at least they came out Toriyama |
Mar 17, 2023 3:03 PM
#24
Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Because dragonball super isn’t canon, we aren’t going to see much of uub like that. It's quite the opposite, Dragon Ball Super it's the canon follow up of the story after Majin Buu, so you can be sure to see him, in the he already appeared We already got a follow up story according to akira toriyama if you read wsj, his words not mine, “"I thought, 'Man, I really made everyone old' ... I even gave Vegeta a mustache” after that he just explains the placement for super, like I said not canon, however it has its own canonicity, just not to the rest of the series, you can’t really expect people to believe this series is canon after the many retcons and shit 🎪 That mustached Vegeta, it's not canon, just think about it, Tori came to work in Dragon Ball franchise just now after the conclusion of the manga series, Super Hero it's clearly a story written by Tori and he is also the one who wrote the canon stories that started the series again, Battle of Gods and Resurrection of F. Not to mention the fact that Tori it's chief editor of Toyotaro So we just gonna ignore it’s a series toriyama oversaw and created, everything you said that’s canon is only canon to dragonball super, think about it, they ended the stories so many times just for them to make a series after a dragonball movie does #’s in the theaters yeah, retcons, downgrades, the first few arcs were retellings from movies, yeah no that shit ain’t canon to the rest of dragonball, your movie argument also confirms that cause what other dragonball movie is canon to dragonball? Only a series within the franchise could do that so it’s not canon to dragonball, Gt is canon, super isn’t, go about your day pal :) It's you who's wrong, even Toriyama said GT it's more like a spinoff series, something that could happen or couldn't, even Dragon Ball Room don't want talk about GT, not only because it's not the follow up of the original story, not only because what happened in the series rewrote half of Dragon Ball story, but because it was a bad show. So, if in 2023, Shueisha says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, Toriyama says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, Toyotaro says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, the Dragon Ball Room says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, all the people who works on Dragon Ball stories says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, it means that Dragon Ball Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, you like it or not Toriyama been said it was canon, he made it so it’s his call not the fans and most definitely not yours or anyone else’s bud but you’re gonna ignore that cause of personal bias, grow up, the info’s right in front of you, ignorance is bliss I guess, super is not canon to the main story, whether *YOU* want it to be or not or like it or not, he ain’t just gonna say what he created years ago isn’t canon because it’s not good, what kind of sense does that make? He chose to write a different story set after the buu saga and went from there, if it isn’t clear that you’re wrong then that says more about you than anything else. Go on about your day bud :) So you're telling that you are gonna ignore the fact that everyone, E V E R Y O N E, and when I say everyone I mean it, knows that Super is the continuation of Dragon Ball Z, and I'm not talking of the source material because the comic doesn't have and doesn't need a sequel, to continue to think that GT, that's know to be a spinoff, a side story, is the real sequel? Sorry to tell you that, but I think you're the only one who remained in the 2000, plus the rest of the people would not change just because someone wrote that on MyAnimeList You say everyone like everyone watches anime, you say everyone like you have a huge backing? You say everyone as in the fandom itself is gonna agree with you, I stayed in the 2000? You’re staying in Delusional world, when you look at the two series, ask the fandom which is more like dragonball, GT? super? This so called everyone. E V E R Y O N E regardless if they liked it or not will say GT I promise you, if it was side story it would’ve gone in a different direction like super did, at least GT A.T oversaw production and was involved more with his creation ha saying you know what you take over but I’ll step in when we’re shooting for bags💰 (movies) which is even more of a reason why it’s not canon cause if it’s not a movie or big decision in the manga he don’t even touch it, I can’t say that for GT, finally you gotta look at it this way, if A.T had ever said this garbage was canon, it’s only cause that’s his job not him, anyone who looks into the guy knows that so hop hop bud you’re not him Thanks, I know, I'm not Toriyama, plus the things I'm talking about happened in the last three/four years, instead of you, that's talking about 20 years old interviews. Last, you are also not Tori, so please try to bring suitable arguments instead of saying "GT it's canon because i like it, Super it's not canon because no" See that’s the thing I never mentioned anything about perineal bias such as I like it or super is better because xx or yy I just mentioned differences f involvement, and most important the faithfulness of the story that makes dragonball…..well dragonball, so I think I’m being very suitable with my arguments and yes neither of us are A.T please keep some semblance of commons sense in your arguments. Wait, do you really think that GT it's faithfull? GT? The story where a giant golden monkey appears because the people who worked on GT also worked on Dragon Ball Z and they put the previously mentioned golden monkey, that doesn't exist in the manga, in Dragon Ball GT? Not mention that the golden monkey evolve into a furry with black and red hairs instead of the classic golden color. Man, I don't like Super Saiyan God or Blue but at least they came out Toriyama Common sense likes to say, GT started off where Z ended, went back to its roots of the mystical adventure aspect albeit in space with fodder villains to keep the story watcahable (even if the first arc made me want to bleach my eye sockets once I matured and my taste in anime improved), then took a turn and introduced villains that thought they could walk over goku and co. And destroy to take their planet, each arc ending with goku saving the earth, how much more faithful can Gt get? ————————————————————— SSJ4 came out of toriyama too, again, common sense, I hope you didn’t think A.T didn’t approve of this before the production team got the green light to go, we actually have something we can agree on cause I’m with you there, Super saiyan god and blue are a no go but at least super saiyan 4 was goated, yeah to some, toriyama wasn’t in his bag with the execution of overseeing the production of it but at least it made sense and was a powerful form cause if a everyday assassin is packing up the god transformations and frieza turning into a chameleon is packing up the god transformations then it’s no wonder we got U.I and U.E, and MUI and etc., no fucking consistency, SSJ4 was enough to handle 3 main arc villains, god and blue get packed up in almost every arc so it’s no wonder we don’t see SSJ 1,2, or 3 (which got done the dirtiest) |
Mar 17, 2023 3:08 PM
#25
RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Because dragonball super isn’t canon, we aren’t going to see much of uub like that. It's quite the opposite, Dragon Ball Super it's the canon follow up of the story after Majin Buu, so you can be sure to see him, in the he already appeared We already got a follow up story according to akira toriyama if you read wsj, his words not mine, “"I thought, 'Man, I really made everyone old' ... I even gave Vegeta a mustache” after that he just explains the placement for super, like I said not canon, however it has its own canonicity, just not to the rest of the series, you can’t really expect people to believe this series is canon after the many retcons and shit 🎪 That mustached Vegeta, it's not canon, just think about it, Tori came to work in Dragon Ball franchise just now after the conclusion of the manga series, Super Hero it's clearly a story written by Tori and he is also the one who wrote the canon stories that started the series again, Battle of Gods and Resurrection of F. Not to mention the fact that Tori it's chief editor of Toyotaro So we just gonna ignore it’s a series toriyama oversaw and created, everything you said that’s canon is only canon to dragonball super, think about it, they ended the stories so many times just for them to make a series after a dragonball movie does #’s in the theaters yeah, retcons, downgrades, the first few arcs were retellings from movies, yeah no that shit ain’t canon to the rest of dragonball, your movie argument also confirms that cause what other dragonball movie is canon to dragonball? Only a series within the franchise could do that so it’s not canon to dragonball, Gt is canon, super isn’t, go about your day pal :) It's you who's wrong, even Toriyama said GT it's more like a spinoff series, something that could happen or couldn't, even Dragon Ball Room don't want talk about GT, not only because it's not the follow up of the original story, not only because what happened in the series rewrote half of Dragon Ball story, but because it was a bad show. So, if in 2023, Shueisha says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, Toriyama says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, Toyotaro says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, the Dragon Ball Room says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, all the people who works on Dragon Ball stories says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, it means that Dragon Ball Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, you like it or not Toriyama been said it was canon, he made it so it’s his call not the fans and most definitely not yours or anyone else’s bud but you’re gonna ignore that cause of personal bias, grow up, the info’s right in front of you, ignorance is bliss I guess, super is not canon to the main story, whether *YOU* want it to be or not or like it or not, he ain’t just gonna say what he created years ago isn’t canon because it’s not good, what kind of sense does that make? He chose to write a different story set after the buu saga and went from there, if it isn’t clear that you’re wrong then that says more about you than anything else. Go on about your day bud :) So you're telling that you are gonna ignore the fact that everyone, E V E R Y O N E, and when I say everyone I mean it, knows that Super is the continuation of Dragon Ball Z, and I'm not talking of the source material because the comic doesn't have and doesn't need a sequel, to continue to think that GT, that's know to be a spinoff, a side story, is the real sequel? Sorry to tell you that, but I think you're the only one who remained in the 2000, plus the rest of the people would not change just because someone wrote that on MyAnimeList You say everyone like everyone watches anime, you say everyone like you have a huge backing? You say everyone as in the fandom itself is gonna agree with you, I stayed in the 2000? You’re staying in Delusional world, when you look at the two series, ask the fandom which is more like dragonball, GT? super? This so called everyone. E V E R Y O N E regardless if they liked it or not will say GT I promise you, if it was side story it would’ve gone in a different direction like super did, at least GT A.T oversaw production and was involved more with his creation ha saying you know what you take over but I’ll step in when we’re shooting for bags💰 (movies) which is even more of a reason why it’s not canon cause if it’s not a movie or big decision in the manga he don’t even touch it, I can’t say that for GT, finally you gotta look at it this way, if A.T had ever said this garbage was canon, it’s only cause that’s his job not him, anyone who looks into the guy knows that so hop hop bud you’re not him Thanks, I know, I'm not Toriyama, plus the things I'm talking about happened in the last three/four years, instead of you, that's talking about 20 years old interviews. Last, you are also not Tori, so please try to bring suitable arguments instead of saying "GT it's canon because i like it, Super it's not canon because no" See that’s the thing I never mentioned anything about perineal bias such as I like it or super is better because xx or yy I just mentioned differences f involvement, and most important the faithfulness of the story that makes dragonball…..well dragonball, so I think I’m being very suitable with my arguments and yes neither of us are A.T please keep some semblance of commons sense in your arguments. Wait, do you really think that GT it's faithfull? GT? The story where a giant golden monkey appears because the people who worked on GT also worked on Dragon Ball Z and they put the previously mentioned golden monkey, that doesn't exist in the manga, in Dragon Ball GT? Not mention that the golden monkey evolve into a furry with black and red hairs instead of the classic golden color. Man, I don't like Super Saiyan God or Blue but at least they came out Toriyama Common sense likes to say, GT started off where Z ended, went back to its roots of the mystical adventure aspect albeit in space with fodder villains to keep the story watcahable (even if the first arc made me want to bleach my eye sockets once I matured and my taste in anime improved), then took a turn and introduced villains that thought they could walk over goku and co. And destroy to take their planet, each arc ending with goku saving the earth, how much more faithful can Gt get? ————————————————————— SSJ4 came out of toriyama too, again, common sense, I hope you didn’t think A.T didn’t approve of this before the production team got the green light to go, we actually have something we can agree on cause I’m with you there, Super saiyan god and blue are a no go but at least super saiyan 4 was goated, yeah to some, toriyama wasn’t in his bag with the execution of overseeing the production of it but at least it made sense and was a powerful form cause if a everyday assassin is packing up the god transformations and frieza turning into a chameleon is packing up the god transformations then it’s no wonder we got U.I and U.E, and MUI and etc., no fucking consistency, SSJ4 was enough to handle 3 main arc villains, god and blue get packed up in almost every arc so it’s no wonder we don’t see SSJ 1,2, or 3 (which got done the dirtiest) At this point I have to ask, did you read the comic or did you watch Dragon Ball and Dragon Ball Z? |
Mar 17, 2023 11:37 PM
#26
Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Because dragonball super isn’t canon, we aren’t going to see much of uub like that. It's quite the opposite, Dragon Ball Super it's the canon follow up of the story after Majin Buu, so you can be sure to see him, in the he already appeared We already got a follow up story according to akira toriyama if you read wsj, his words not mine, “"I thought, 'Man, I really made everyone old' ... I even gave Vegeta a mustache” after that he just explains the placement for super, like I said not canon, however it has its own canonicity, just not to the rest of the series, you can’t really expect people to believe this series is canon after the many retcons and shit 🎪 That mustached Vegeta, it's not canon, just think about it, Tori came to work in Dragon Ball franchise just now after the conclusion of the manga series, Super Hero it's clearly a story written by Tori and he is also the one who wrote the canon stories that started the series again, Battle of Gods and Resurrection of F. Not to mention the fact that Tori it's chief editor of Toyotaro So we just gonna ignore it’s a series toriyama oversaw and created, everything you said that’s canon is only canon to dragonball super, think about it, they ended the stories so many times just for them to make a series after a dragonball movie does #’s in the theaters yeah, retcons, downgrades, the first few arcs were retellings from movies, yeah no that shit ain’t canon to the rest of dragonball, your movie argument also confirms that cause what other dragonball movie is canon to dragonball? Only a series within the franchise could do that so it’s not canon to dragonball, Gt is canon, super isn’t, go about your day pal :) It's you who's wrong, even Toriyama said GT it's more like a spinoff series, something that could happen or couldn't, even Dragon Ball Room don't want talk about GT, not only because it's not the follow up of the original story, not only because what happened in the series rewrote half of Dragon Ball story, but because it was a bad show. So, if in 2023, Shueisha says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, Toriyama says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, Toyotaro says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, the Dragon Ball Room says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, all the people who works on Dragon Ball stories says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, it means that Dragon Ball Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, you like it or not Toriyama been said it was canon, he made it so it’s his call not the fans and most definitely not yours or anyone else’s bud but you’re gonna ignore that cause of personal bias, grow up, the info’s right in front of you, ignorance is bliss I guess, super is not canon to the main story, whether *YOU* want it to be or not or like it or not, he ain’t just gonna say what he created years ago isn’t canon because it’s not good, what kind of sense does that make? He chose to write a different story set after the buu saga and went from there, if it isn’t clear that you’re wrong then that says more about you than anything else. Go on about your day bud :) So you're telling that you are gonna ignore the fact that everyone, E V E R Y O N E, and when I say everyone I mean it, knows that Super is the continuation of Dragon Ball Z, and I'm not talking of the source material because the comic doesn't have and doesn't need a sequel, to continue to think that GT, that's know to be a spinoff, a side story, is the real sequel? Sorry to tell you that, but I think you're the only one who remained in the 2000, plus the rest of the people would not change just because someone wrote that on MyAnimeList You say everyone like everyone watches anime, you say everyone like you have a huge backing? You say everyone as in the fandom itself is gonna agree with you, I stayed in the 2000? You’re staying in Delusional world, when you look at the two series, ask the fandom which is more like dragonball, GT? super? This so called everyone. E V E R Y O N E regardless if they liked it or not will say GT I promise you, if it was side story it would’ve gone in a different direction like super did, at least GT A.T oversaw production and was involved more with his creation ha saying you know what you take over but I’ll step in when we’re shooting for bags💰 (movies) which is even more of a reason why it’s not canon cause if it’s not a movie or big decision in the manga he don’t even touch it, I can’t say that for GT, finally you gotta look at it this way, if A.T had ever said this garbage was canon, it’s only cause that’s his job not him, anyone who looks into the guy knows that so hop hop bud you’re not him Thanks, I know, I'm not Toriyama, plus the things I'm talking about happened in the last three/four years, instead of you, that's talking about 20 years old interviews. Last, you are also not Tori, so please try to bring suitable arguments instead of saying "GT it's canon because i like it, Super it's not canon because no" See that’s the thing I never mentioned anything about perineal bias such as I like it or super is better because xx or yy I just mentioned differences f involvement, and most important the faithfulness of the story that makes dragonball…..well dragonball, so I think I’m being very suitable with my arguments and yes neither of us are A.T please keep some semblance of commons sense in your arguments. Wait, do you really think that GT it's faithfull? GT? The story where a giant golden monkey appears because the people who worked on GT also worked on Dragon Ball Z and they put the previously mentioned golden monkey, that doesn't exist in the manga, in Dragon Ball GT? Not mention that the golden monkey evolve into a furry with black and red hairs instead of the classic golden color. Man, I don't like Super Saiyan God or Blue but at least they came out Toriyama Common sense likes to say, GT started off where Z ended, went back to its roots of the mystical adventure aspect albeit in space with fodder villains to keep the story watcahable (even if the first arc made me want to bleach my eye sockets once I matured and my taste in anime improved), then took a turn and introduced villains that thought they could walk over goku and co. And destroy to take their planet, each arc ending with goku saving the earth, how much more faithful can Gt get? ————————————————————— SSJ4 came out of toriyama too, again, common sense, I hope you didn’t think A.T didn’t approve of this before the production team got the green light to go, we actually have something we can agree on cause I’m with you there, Super saiyan god and blue are a no go but at least super saiyan 4 was goated, yeah to some, toriyama wasn’t in his bag with the execution of overseeing the production of it but at least it made sense and was a powerful form cause if a everyday assassin is packing up the god transformations and frieza turning into a chameleon is packing up the god transformations then it’s no wonder we got U.I and U.E, and MUI and etc., no fucking consistency, SSJ4 was enough to handle 3 main arc villains, god and blue get packed up in almost every arc so it’s no wonder we don’t see SSJ 1,2, or 3 (which got done the dirtiest) At this point I have to ask, did you read the comic or did you watch Dragon Ball and Dragon Ball Z? I watched everything dragonball has to offer, yes, even super, well once the universe 6 arc got announced ofc, didn’t watch any if the movie episode super tried to shove down our throats, i she not “read” anything dragonball has to offer, I put the quotations cause I never sat down and read chapter for chapter or comic page for comic page, In other words, I just skimmed through most of the manga/comic material dragonball has to offer. |
Mar 18, 2023 7:48 AM
#27
| Because Super is a mess. The split manga and anime canons especially |
Mar 19, 2023 10:17 AM
#28
RequiemLo64 said: Because dragonball super isn’t canon, we aren’t going to see much of uub like that. Supers Manga is Canon. No idea where you get the idea that it's not. Uub has already been shown in the Manga and will reappear in the next arc or two. |
Mar 19, 2023 10:19 AM
#29
Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Irshiki said: RequiemLo64 said: Because dragonball super isn’t canon, we aren’t going to see much of uub like that. It's quite the opposite, Dragon Ball Super it's the canon follow up of the story after Majin Buu, so you can be sure to see him, in the he already appeared We already got a follow up story according to akira toriyama if you read wsj, his words not mine, “"I thought, 'Man, I really made everyone old' ... I even gave Vegeta a mustache” after that he just explains the placement for super, like I said not canon, however it has its own canonicity, just not to the rest of the series, you can’t really expect people to believe this series is canon after the many retcons and shit 🎪 That mustached Vegeta, it's not canon, just think about it, Tori came to work in Dragon Ball franchise just now after the conclusion of the manga series, Super Hero it's clearly a story written by Tori and he is also the one who wrote the canon stories that started the series again, Battle of Gods and Resurrection of F. Not to mention the fact that Tori it's chief editor of Toyotaro So we just gonna ignore it’s a series toriyama oversaw and created, everything you said that’s canon is only canon to dragonball super, think about it, they ended the stories so many times just for them to make a series after a dragonball movie does #’s in the theaters yeah, retcons, downgrades, the first few arcs were retellings from movies, yeah no that shit ain’t canon to the rest of dragonball, your movie argument also confirms that cause what other dragonball movie is canon to dragonball? Only a series within the franchise could do that so it’s not canon to dragonball, Gt is canon, super isn’t, go about your day pal :) It's you who's wrong, even Toriyama said GT it's more like a spinoff series, something that could happen or couldn't, even Dragon Ball Room don't want talk about GT, not only because it's not the follow up of the original story, not only because what happened in the series rewrote half of Dragon Ball story, but because it was a bad show. So, if in 2023, Shueisha says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, Toriyama says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, Toyotaro says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, the Dragon Ball Room says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, all the people who works on Dragon Ball stories says that Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, it means that Dragon Ball Super it's the canon sequel of Dragon Ball, you like it or not Preach ! This dudes trippin |
Mar 19, 2023 10:28 AM
#30
| For anyone questioning it. The creators have already confirmed the correct Canon Is Dragonball-->Z-->Super GT has been confirmed to not be Canon for 25 year's now. All the more confirmed by Super shutting down all possibilities of GT being canon. https://dragonballuniverse.fandom.com/wiki/Canon |
Mar 19, 2023 11:51 AM
#31
DayRivia said: For anyone questioning it. The creators have already confirmed the correct Canon Is Dragonball-->Z-->Super GT has been confirmed to not be Canon for 25 year's now. All the more confirmed by Super shutting down all possibilities of GT being canon. https://dragonballuniverse.fandom.com/wiki/Canon Super isn’t canon, if you think it is you’re an idiot or you just live downgrades, plus fandom isn’t a reliable source tbf since it’s just everyday people running ti so if anyone’s trippin’ you are, try again. |
Mar 21, 2023 12:56 PM
#32
| They literally cited the source out of Japan. It's sad that you believe this so strongly when you're simply just wrong. |
Mar 21, 2023 1:03 PM
#33
DayRivia said: All the more confirmed by Super shutting down all possibilities of GT being canon. Super also shot down the possibilities of the ending of Z being canon tho... We are talking about Toriyama here tho , he doesn't care at all about his work , and say what he's paid for. Officially Super is indeed canon , but it makes absolutely no sense that it really is , hence why some fans just don't accept it. |
 "Genius lives only one story above madness." – Arthur Schopenhauer. "Stupidity is a talent for misconception." – Edgar Allan Poe. "I'm tired... and hungry." – Alexioos95. |
Mar 21, 2023 1:17 PM
#34
| No it's hasn't. Not saying they won't recon the Z ending. But it hasn't been done yet. The Z ending is 10 years after Buu. We are still within the 10 year gap. They could lead the story to the ending that we see at the end of Z. Not sure if they will but it's not impossible. |
Mar 21, 2023 1:20 PM
#35
Alexioos95 said: DayRivia said: All the more confirmed by Super shutting down all possibilities of GT being canon. Super also shot down the possibilities of the ending of Z being canon tho... We are talking about Toriyama here tho , he doesn't care at all about his work , and say what he's paid for. Officially Super is indeed canon , but it makes absolutely no sense that it really is , hence why some fans just don't accept it. seems the manga is entering the timeline right before end of Z. Toriyama Confirmed. https://comicbook.com/anime/news/dragon-ball-super-timeline-toriyama/ Still crazy how this is debated. |
Mar 21, 2023 2:06 PM
#36
DayRivia said: No it's hasn't. Not saying they won't recon the Z ending. Super already retconned the original Manga. At the end of the Manga/Z , it's said that Goku and Bulma haven't met for 5 years , and that the world was at peace all that time. In Super they meet almost everyday , and the world is really far from being in peace... It's "just" 1 page , but it's retconned nonetheless. DayRivia said: Still crazy how this is debated. Because the situation is stupid. The Author declared that Super is canon , but if we take the original Manga as the core , it just cannot. Super retcon the end of the Manga/DBZ , so it's painfully stupid to call it canon , especially since it's a cash grab made 20 years after the end of the original... And when we know how Toriyama is , it's all the more upsetting. In case you didn't knew , he did said that GT was canon when it was first promoted , but he later denied it saying it was a disgrace to what he established beforehand in the original Manga... Not impossible that it happens for Super too in a few years. |
Alexioos95Mar 21, 2023 2:30 PM
"Genius lives only one story above madness." – Arthur Schopenhauer. "Stupidity is a talent for misconception." – Edgar Allan Poe. "I'm tired... and hungry." – Alexioos95. |
Mar 21, 2023 7:42 PM
#37
| That won't happen. You or anyone here has yet to prove how Super is filler. How did Super retcon the end of Z when the ending of Z hasn't even happened yet. What retcons ruin all the continuity? DB isn't perfect but it's not bad enough that there are countless plotholes. Most issues people have can be explained. |
Mar 22, 2023 1:27 AM
#38
DayRivia said: How did Super retcon the end of Z when the ending of Z hasn't even happened yet. I already said it , but at the end of the Manga : After the battle with Buu , there is a timeskip of 10 years , and we then see a few pages , in which Bulma meets Goku and talk. Bulma is angry at Goku because he didn't met the team in those 10 whole years , and he answer back that she really became old now. (She then say that she'll ask Shenron to make her young again when she have time.) It's also strongly implied that the world was at peace all that time. After that , they go to the Tenkaichi Budokai , and Goku fight Uub. So now with Super : How haven't they met in 10 years , when they meet almost every day ? How is the world in peace , when there is peoples like Beerus , Freezer etc. out there ? How is Bulma old , when she already asked Shenron to make her young again at the very start ? If you take the whole ending idea , with the team participating in a new Tenkaichi Budokai and that Goku meets Uub and leave with him , it can still happens , no problem. But every details in this ending already got impossible to be true in Super , therefore , Super did retcon the ending. |
"Genius lives only one story above madness." – Arthur Schopenhauer. "Stupidity is a talent for misconception." – Edgar Allan Poe. "I'm tired... and hungry." – Alexioos95. |
More topics from this board
» Would Zamasu have gone evil if he were in another universe?Ghostfreak2005 - Oct 5 |
2 |
by Edward7215
»»
Oct 6, 8:34 AM |
|
» What universe do you think Goku and the gang should go to face a big threat and save that universe.Camoboi1 - Sep 30 |
3 |
by DayRivia
»»
Oct 1, 12:27 PM |
|
Poll: » Dragon Ball Super Episode 7 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )Stark700 - Aug 22, 2015 |
130 |
by MoltenCheeser
»»
Sep 11, 9:55 AM |
|
Poll: » Dragon Ball Super Episode 131 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Stark700 - Mar 24, 2018 |
301 |
by Willis1
»»
Aug 30, 10:24 AM |
|
Poll: » Dragon Ball Super Episode 3 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )Stark700 - Jul 18, 2015 |
131 |
by DTEC_09
»»
Aug 21, 7:49 PM |