New
Mar 22, 2017 1:09 PM
#701
logic340 said: Okay good. I thought I was losing my mind. Or that my internet went out and I never actually posted anythingOyasumi_Rosie said: your last post was at the top of this page 2 hours agoAre my post actually showing up??? https://myanimelist.net/forum/?topicid=1600569&show=650#msg50072956 |
Mar 22, 2017 1:11 PM
#702
amberwillow said: fair enough, I can see where you're coming from there with the difference. RE is someone I need to look at since she got my attention butting into or conversation but not site if I'll have time to review her before EoD. Currently on mobile headed home from work.logic340 said: I meant that she might think that it might be suspicious, I dunno if it would. Your, Rosie's and Grape's situation is bit different from what I am talking about cuz votes are more related to the previous game not this one, so it gives a different feel I suppose.amberwillow said: logic340 said: M8, u started it xd that's why I didn't want to focus on RE anymore and go to a hypothesis word when I am not susp of her anymore ;Damberwillow said: logic340 said: I get it why it felt nitpicky my first question actually was of this kind, cuz I wanted to get a reaction But nah, I was thinking about how she appears from her point, not about her protecting one of u.amberwillow said: logic340 said: I think u are starting to misinterpret me. I didn't say that she would be in trouble, I said that from her point of view it might have appeared to her that it would be risky to get in a position where she would be questioned. I don't know what she felt, that's why I started asking those questions.amberwillow said: So you think that RE felt she would be put in a bad spot if she voted me right after Crossbell did? So the post about giving Dog Lovers a reprieve was her way of staying off my train? logic340 said: That was/is a possibility. But to be more specific, I was thinking that she might not want to be put in a badspot like be questioned if she was to vote u, because there was already a vote on u.amberwillow said: Basically what I took from your initial question to her was that she was trying to keep pressure off of me (her scum buddy) or possibly Claire due to the whole Dogs thing. logic340 said: That's what I thought. But later when we were talking how I understand she meant that it wasn't the case why she voted Cross and not Claire (or how I thought u). She claimed that she had a reason for voting Cross even though she didn't tell it at that moment. On this specific part we kinda agreed to disagree. I still can't be sure if she said it truthfully and probably I won't know until game ends, but what she said sounded relatively honest to me.amberwillow said: I agree with the first part she did say she knew where to vote then vote cross with her message of giving us a reprieve. Do you suspect that was to keep pressure off of a teammate? and me specifically?logic340 said: It looked like she wanted to vote u or Claire but she chose Cross instead (after seeing that u had already been voted) and the message next to the vote felt a little bit strange and that made me a little bit aware of her, so I thought of seeing her reaction.amberwillow said: What are you implying here?Oh why so why so? Looks like u were on mood to vote logic or Claire? dont remember if there were other dog peeps Don't want unneeded attention? I felt you insinuated that since she didn't vote me or Claire because one of us may be her partner. Is that what your line of questioning thereafter was about or did you think she slipped in a different way? That sounds like a weird conclusion for you to come to? Now if you are suspecting RE of protecting a scum buddy (me or Claire). Then it makes sense. If I'm her partner she can use the dog lover pardon to not have to vote for me etc. But if that is the case she could have just voted Claire? If Claire was her partner she could have me? But I had a vote and might bring questions that way so she voted Crossbell? You got all that from that opening post? So basically for this to make any sense RE would have to be protecting Claire her teammate and not want to comment on me due to a vote already being there. Why not just place and RVS and not say anything about the dog lovers? I am having trouble seeing this as a scum slip can you explain it to me further? Geez, the more u say the more it feels that u want me to think of u two as scumbuddies. I am not sure what u missed, but I am not suspecting her anymore (at least on such a big scale). If that is the case then yes, I think it would have been more likely of her to vote Claire then, but she didn't. But I didn't really suspect her to be a scumbuddies with either of u, I was more inclined to think that she is taking care of her image. I didn't get all that from just that post but it was the first thing what caught my attention and then I presented her the questions that were raised from her replies. Not necessary, she could have tried to protect either if it was like your theory. That post itself wasn't the one that bothered me most, it was her replies, I didn't go that deep like you two and her being mafias. I am not sure what else to add here besides what was already said. We kinda resolved that matter already, so now it looks like u want me to keep focusing on her when I had already said that I am planning to look at other susp people. Anw, lemme find some links when I am back from rehearsal if ull still want it, or just check again our convo 2. I didn't miss anything I was trying to understand where you were coming from with you question because it was so open ended that I could come to the conclusions I did. I though you were inferring that her and I or her and Claire were a team so I asked you to clarify it. Not sure how not voting me was taking care of her image can you elaborate on that. second person on an RVS train usually doesn't get flack shti grrr is 4th saying nothing and is under no pressure with less than 10 posts and little content or game solving anything. 3. This one is from my PoV I am town so the only way it makes sense is if Claire is her teammate. Keeping up appearances that early seems unlikely to me. 4. I followed your conversation which is why I had a few questions for clarification. I town read you slightly but those questions needed to be answered for me to feel more comfortable. I kind of get a t/t vibe from your interaction with RE as I think mafia wouldn't have made the dog part which drew your attention. The voting for a reason thing is weird though since there really is no reason to vote during RVS unless you have preconceived bias there. I am not asking you to look back into RE though she drew my attention while I was trying to talk to you about where you were coming from by butting into our conversation. You think so? Well I was mafia ages ago, but I remember being cautious of each of my post as to not mess up something. If that was the case with her or someone else, then I wouldn't really be surprised if they were to think about appearances then. Hm, how to say.. At first is RVS, where people get reactions from votes and if the 2nd person right away voted the same person like 1st then some people might come in questioning and commenting u "why did u vote them when they already have a vote on them. Wouldn't it be more meaningful to vote another person so that we would get more info from people?" and such. Is it clearlier now? Does t/t mean town/town? S/S = Scum-Scum T/T = Town-Town T/S = Town-Scum Hmmmm *checks the beginning of the day* *check what ya wrote again* I am bit lost, what are u implying? That Rosie and Grape should be checked? |
Proud Administrator of the D Gray Man FC and OnePunch-Man FC |
Mar 22, 2017 1:14 PM
#703
Oyasumi_Rosie said: 3 you won't lynch today and 3 you're willing to lynchlogic340 said: Okay good. I thought I was losing my mind. Or that my internet went out and I never actually posted anythingOyasumi_Rosie said: Are my post actually showing up??? https://myanimelist.net/forum/?topicid=1600569&show=650#msg50072956 |
Proud Administrator of the D Gray Man FC and OnePunch-Man FC |
Mar 22, 2017 1:15 PM
#704
Grapefruit21 said: I find him hard to read. Not sure what to make of his questioning. He makes some good points, some are meh. I will need more time to get a better read on him. But I see that he put a lot of effort to make people talk, so I like that. Rn he's neutral to me, leaning bit to town side.@Crossbell what are your thoughts on logic @amberwillow same to you. To few people in the thread right now. I do not like it. |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
Mar 22, 2017 1:18 PM
#705
Mar 22, 2017 1:18 PM
#706
logic340 said: hmmm 3 you won't lynch today and 3 you're willing to lynch -Unwilling Myself Crossbell Sollux Why? Because you said name three people. -Willing You Grapefruit CP I find that you three are causing the most confusion in this game so far. I think one of you guys it will make the game easier to understand while giving us something to analyse the following phases. |
Mar 22, 2017 1:19 PM
#707
@Grapefruit21 There have been no changes since the previous vote count so here it is again for reference Kit said: 🐭 Vote Count 1.7 🐭 CorruptedPurity (3) Grapefruit21, PentaFlare, _Claire_ Grrr (2) followind, CorruptedPurity _Claire_ (2) Logic340, Crossbell Logic340 (1) Grrr RE1031 (1) Lam-B PentaFlare (1) Sollux16 Oyasumi_Rosie (1) RE1031 Not Voting Oyasumi_Rosie, amberwillow 🐭 Vote History 🐭 logic340: Grapefruit21 > unvote > _Claire_ > Grapefruit21 > _Claire_ Crossbell: Logic340 > _Claire_ Oyasumi_Rosie: Grapefruit21 RE1031: Crossbell > amberwillow > unvote > Oyasumi_Rosie _Claire_: Logic340 > CorruptedPurity > Grrr > CorruptedPurity Grapefruit21: Logic340 > RE1031 > Oyasumi_Rosie > RE1031 > CorruptedPurity Grrr: Logic340 PentaFlare: Grapefruit21 > CorruptedPurity Sollux16: followind > unvote > PentaFlare amberwillow: RE1031 > unvote Lam-B: RE1031 CorruptedPurity: Grapefruit21, Grrr followind: Grrr Mod notes: Apawlogies for the lack of early morning VC, kitties need 18 hours of sleep y'knyow~ :3 🕒 Countdown to Night 1 🕒 |
Mar 22, 2017 1:22 PM
#708
This vote count is exactly the type of thing that we need to avoid. @Oyasumi_Rosie @amberwillow not acceptable to not be voting with 40 minutes left in the phase. @Re1031 @Sollux16 @Lam-b @Grrr if you're online you need to either going a main wagon or give us a compelling reason to follow your vote. |
Mar 22, 2017 1:23 PM
#709
logic340 said: amberwillow said: fair enough, I can see where you're coming from there with the difference. RE is someone I need to look at since she got my attention butting into or conversation but not site if I'll have time to review her before EoD. Currently on mobile headed home from work.logic340 said: amberwillow said: No you said the second person who votes right after someone else would look suspicious. Well we have two examples of that in Rosie and Grapefruit who garnered no suspicion for jumping quickly to the second seat on the train. Not implying anything just saying we have a real situation to compare against you hypothetical one. logic340 said: M8, u started it xd that's why I didn't want to focus on RE anymore and go to a hypothesis word when I am not susp of her anymore ;Damberwillow said: logic340 said: I get it why it felt nitpicky my first question actually was of this kind, cuz I wanted to get a reaction But nah, I was thinking about how she appears from her point, not about her protecting one of u.amberwillow said: logic340 said: I think u are starting to misinterpret me. I didn't say that she would be in trouble, I said that from her point of view it might have appeared to her that it would be risky to get in a position where she would be questioned. I don't know what she felt, that's why I started asking those questions.amberwillow said: So you think that RE felt she would be put in a bad spot if she voted me right after Crossbell did? So the post about giving Dog Lovers a reprieve was her way of staying off my train? logic340 said: That was/is a possibility. But to be more specific, I was thinking that she might not want to be put in a badspot like be questioned if she was to vote u, because there was already a vote on u.amberwillow said: Basically what I took from your initial question to her was that she was trying to keep pressure off of me (her scum buddy) or possibly Claire due to the whole Dogs thing. logic340 said: That's what I thought. But later when we were talking how I understand she meant that it wasn't the case why she voted Cross and not Claire (or how I thought u). She claimed that she had a reason for voting Cross even though she didn't tell it at that moment. On this specific part we kinda agreed to disagree. I still can't be sure if she said it truthfully and probably I won't know until game ends, but what she said sounded relatively honest to me.amberwillow said: I agree with the first part she did say she knew where to vote then vote cross with her message of giving us a reprieve. Do you suspect that was to keep pressure off of a teammate? and me specifically?logic340 said: It looked like she wanted to vote u or Claire but she chose Cross instead (after seeing that u had already been voted) and the message next to the vote felt a little bit strange and that made me a little bit aware of her, so I thought of seeing her reaction.amberwillow said: What are you implying here?Oh why so why so? Looks like u were on mood to vote logic or Claire? dont remember if there were other dog peeps Don't want unneeded attention? I felt you insinuated that since she didn't vote me or Claire because one of us may be her partner. Is that what your line of questioning thereafter was about or did you think she slipped in a different way? That sounds like a weird conclusion for you to come to? Now if you are suspecting RE of protecting a scum buddy (me or Claire). Then it makes sense. If I'm her partner she can use the dog lover pardon to not have to vote for me etc. But if that is the case she could have just voted Claire? If Claire was her partner she could have me? But I had a vote and might bring questions that way so she voted Crossbell? You got all that from that opening post? So basically for this to make any sense RE would have to be protecting Claire her teammate and not want to comment on me due to a vote already being there. Why not just place and RVS and not say anything about the dog lovers? I am having trouble seeing this as a scum slip can you explain it to me further? Geez, the more u say the more it feels that u want me to think of u two as scumbuddies. I am not sure what u missed, but I am not suspecting her anymore (at least on such a big scale). If that is the case then yes, I think it would have been more likely of her to vote Claire then, but she didn't. But I didn't really suspect her to be a scumbuddies with either of u, I was more inclined to think that she is taking care of her image. I didn't get all that from just that post but it was the first thing what caught my attention and then I presented her the questions that were raised from her replies. Not necessary, she could have tried to protect either if it was like your theory. That post itself wasn't the one that bothered me most, it was her replies, I didn't go that deep like you two and her being mafias. I am not sure what else to add here besides what was already said. We kinda resolved that matter already, so now it looks like u want me to keep focusing on her when I had already said that I am planning to look at other susp people. Anw, lemme find some links when I am back from rehearsal if ull still want it, or just check again our convo 2. I didn't miss anything I was trying to understand where you were coming from with you question because it was so open ended that I could come to the conclusions I did. I though you were inferring that her and I or her and Claire were a team so I asked you to clarify it. Not sure how not voting me was taking care of her image can you elaborate on that. second person on an RVS train usually doesn't get flack shti grrr is 4th saying nothing and is under no pressure with less than 10 posts and little content or game solving anything. 3. This one is from my PoV I am town so the only way it makes sense is if Claire is her teammate. Keeping up appearances that early seems unlikely to me. 4. I followed your conversation which is why I had a few questions for clarification. I town read you slightly but those questions needed to be answered for me to feel more comfortable. I kind of get a t/t vibe from your interaction with RE as I think mafia wouldn't have made the dog part which drew your attention. The voting for a reason thing is weird though since there really is no reason to vote during RVS unless you have preconceived bias there. I am not asking you to look back into RE though she drew my attention while I was trying to talk to you about where you were coming from by butting into our conversation. You think so? Well I was mafia ages ago, but I remember being cautious of each of my post as to not mess up something. If that was the case with her or someone else, then I wouldn't really be surprised if they were to think about appearances then. Hm, how to say.. At first is RVS, where people get reactions from votes and if the 2nd person right away voted the same person like 1st then some people might come in questioning and commenting u "why did u vote them when they already have a vote on them. Wouldn't it be more meaningful to vote another person so that we would get more info from people?" and such. Is it clearlier now? Does t/t mean town/town? S/S = Scum-Scum T/T = Town-Town T/S = Town-Scum Hmmmm *checks the beginning of the day* *check what ya wrote again* I am bit lost, what are u implying? That Rosie and Grape should be checked? Good, look into me. It's a bit annoying you're claiming that I'm butting into your conversation when the conversation was literally about me and amberwilow's interaction. You claim that you aren't sure about our alignment but ask her about it and not me? Why? |
...better to be hated for what you are than loved for something you are not. |
Mar 22, 2017 1:25 PM
#710
Hmmm, I really want to see Grape or CP to flip. I feel like Claire I need to analyse her post better and then decided what to do with her. And for Rosei I have too little info. But hmm hmm hmm, both Grape and CP look about equal |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
Mar 22, 2017 1:25 PM
#711
RE1031 said: maybe you didn't follow my conversation with Willow? I was trying to figure out what Willow was insinuating it really had nothing to do with you other than you were the person that she chose. If you have now made it about you which is why I am going to look into you had you in neutral and was willing to just leave you alone for today but you keep egging me on.logic340 said: amberwillow said: logic340 said: I meant that she might think that it might be suspicious, I dunno if it would. Your, Rosie's and Grape's situation is bit different from what I am talking about cuz votes are more related to the previous game not this one, so it gives a different feel I suppose.amberwillow said: No you said the second person who votes right after someone else would look suspicious. Well we have two examples of that in Rosie and Grapefruit who garnered no suspicion for jumping quickly to the second seat on the train. Not implying anything just saying we have a real situation to compare against you hypothetical one. logic340 said: M8, u started it xd that's why I didn't want to focus on RE anymore and go to a hypothesis word when I am not susp of her anymore ;Damberwillow said: logic340 said: I get it why it felt nitpicky my first question actually was of this kind, cuz I wanted to get a reaction But nah, I was thinking about how she appears from her point, not about her protecting one of u.amberwillow said: logic340 said: I think u are starting to misinterpret me. I didn't say that she would be in trouble, I said that from her point of view it might have appeared to her that it would be risky to get in a position where she would be questioned. I don't know what she felt, that's why I started asking those questions.amberwillow said: So you think that RE felt she would be put in a bad spot if she voted me right after Crossbell did? So the post about giving Dog Lovers a reprieve was her way of staying off my train? logic340 said: That was/is a possibility. But to be more specific, I was thinking that she might not want to be put in a badspot like be questioned if she was to vote u, because there was already a vote on u.amberwillow said: Basically what I took from your initial question to her was that she was trying to keep pressure off of me (her scum buddy) or possibly Claire due to the whole Dogs thing. logic340 said: That's what I thought. But later when we were talking how I understand she meant that it wasn't the case why she voted Cross and not Claire (or how I thought u). She claimed that she had a reason for voting Cross even though she didn't tell it at that moment. On this specific part we kinda agreed to disagree. I still can't be sure if she said it truthfully and probably I won't know until game ends, but what she said sounded relatively honest to me.amberwillow said: I agree with the first part she did say she knew where to vote then vote cross with her message of giving us a reprieve. Do you suspect that was to keep pressure off of a teammate? and me specifically?logic340 said: It looked like she wanted to vote u or Claire but she chose Cross instead (after seeing that u had already been voted) and the message next to the vote felt a little bit strange and that made me a little bit aware of her, so I thought of seeing her reaction.amberwillow said: What are you implying here?Oh why so why so? Looks like u were on mood to vote logic or Claire? dont remember if there were other dog peeps Don't want unneeded attention? I felt you insinuated that since she didn't vote me or Claire because one of us may be her partner. Is that what your line of questioning thereafter was about or did you think she slipped in a different way? That sounds like a weird conclusion for you to come to? Now if you are suspecting RE of protecting a scum buddy (me or Claire). Then it makes sense. If I'm her partner she can use the dog lover pardon to not have to vote for me etc. But if that is the case she could have just voted Claire? If Claire was her partner she could have me? But I had a vote and might bring questions that way so she voted Crossbell? You got all that from that opening post? So basically for this to make any sense RE would have to be protecting Claire her teammate and not want to comment on me due to a vote already being there. Why not just place and RVS and not say anything about the dog lovers? I am having trouble seeing this as a scum slip can you explain it to me further? Geez, the more u say the more it feels that u want me to think of u two as scumbuddies. I am not sure what u missed, but I am not suspecting her anymore (at least on such a big scale). If that is the case then yes, I think it would have been more likely of her to vote Claire then, but she didn't. But I didn't really suspect her to be a scumbuddies with either of u, I was more inclined to think that she is taking care of her image. I didn't get all that from just that post but it was the first thing what caught my attention and then I presented her the questions that were raised from her replies. Not necessary, she could have tried to protect either if it was like your theory. That post itself wasn't the one that bothered me most, it was her replies, I didn't go that deep like you two and her being mafias. I am not sure what else to add here besides what was already said. We kinda resolved that matter already, so now it looks like u want me to keep focusing on her when I had already said that I am planning to look at other susp people. Anw, lemme find some links when I am back from rehearsal if ull still want it, or just check again our convo 2. I didn't miss anything I was trying to understand where you were coming from with you question because it was so open ended that I could come to the conclusions I did. I though you were inferring that her and I or her and Claire were a team so I asked you to clarify it. Not sure how not voting me was taking care of her image can you elaborate on that. second person on an RVS train usually doesn't get flack shti grrr is 4th saying nothing and is under no pressure with less than 10 posts and little content or game solving anything. 3. This one is from my PoV I am town so the only way it makes sense is if Claire is her teammate. Keeping up appearances that early seems unlikely to me. 4. I followed your conversation which is why I had a few questions for clarification. I town read you slightly but those questions needed to be answered for me to feel more comfortable. I kind of get a t/t vibe from your interaction with RE as I think mafia wouldn't have made the dog part which drew your attention. The voting for a reason thing is weird though since there really is no reason to vote during RVS unless you have preconceived bias there. I am not asking you to look back into RE though she drew my attention while I was trying to talk to you about where you were coming from by butting into our conversation. You think so? Well I was mafia ages ago, but I remember being cautious of each of my post as to not mess up something. If that was the case with her or someone else, then I wouldn't really be surprised if they were to think about appearances then. Hm, how to say.. At first is RVS, where people get reactions from votes and if the 2nd person right away voted the same person like 1st then some people might come in questioning and commenting u "why did u vote them when they already have a vote on them. Wouldn't it be more meaningful to vote another person so that we would get more info from people?" and such. Is it clearlier now? Does t/t mean town/town? S/S = Scum-Scum T/T = Town-Town T/S = Town-Scum Hmmmm *checks the beginning of the day* *check what ya wrote again* I am bit lost, what are u implying? That Rosie and Grape should be checked? Good, look into me. It's a bit annoying you're claiming that I'm butting into your conversation when the conversation was literally about me and amberwilow's interaction. You claim that you aren't sure about our alignment but ask her about it and not me? Why? |
Proud Administrator of the D Gray Man FC and OnePunch-Man FC |
Mar 22, 2017 1:26 PM
#712
Grapefruit21 said: Man, my head is spinning for who to vote for hours now, don't rush me, I'll vote.This vote count is exactly the type of thing that we need to avoid. @Oyasumi_Rosie @amberwillow not acceptable to not be voting with 40 minutes left in the phase. @Re1031 @Sollux16 @Lam-b @Grrr if you're online you need to either going a main wagon or give us a compelling reason to follow your vote. |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
Mar 22, 2017 1:26 PM
#713
RE1031 said: logic340 said: amberwillow said: logic340 said: I meant that she might think that it might be suspicious, I dunno if it would. Your, Rosie's and Grape's situation is bit different from what I am talking about cuz votes are more related to the previous game not this one, so it gives a different feel I suppose.amberwillow said: No you said the second person who votes right after someone else would look suspicious. Well we have two examples of that in Rosie and Grapefruit who garnered no suspicion for jumping quickly to the second seat on the train. Not implying anything just saying we have a real situation to compare against you hypothetical one. logic340 said: M8, u started it xd that's why I didn't want to focus on RE anymore and go to a hypothesis word when I am not susp of her anymore ;Damberwillow said: logic340 said: I get it why it felt nitpicky my first question actually was of this kind, cuz I wanted to get a reaction But nah, I was thinking about how she appears from her point, not about her protecting one of u.amberwillow said: logic340 said: I think u are starting to misinterpret me. I didn't say that she would be in trouble, I said that from her point of view it might have appeared to her that it would be risky to get in a position where she would be questioned. I don't know what she felt, that's why I started asking those questions.amberwillow said: So you think that RE felt she would be put in a bad spot if she voted me right after Crossbell did? So the post about giving Dog Lovers a reprieve was her way of staying off my train? logic340 said: That was/is a possibility. But to be more specific, I was thinking that she might not want to be put in a badspot like be questioned if she was to vote u, because there was already a vote on u.amberwillow said: Basically what I took from your initial question to her was that she was trying to keep pressure off of me (her scum buddy) or possibly Claire due to the whole Dogs thing. logic340 said: That's what I thought. But later when we were talking how I understand she meant that it wasn't the case why she voted Cross and not Claire (or how I thought u). She claimed that she had a reason for voting Cross even though she didn't tell it at that moment. On this specific part we kinda agreed to disagree. I still can't be sure if she said it truthfully and probably I won't know until game ends, but what she said sounded relatively honest to me.amberwillow said: I agree with the first part she did say she knew where to vote then vote cross with her message of giving us a reprieve. Do you suspect that was to keep pressure off of a teammate? and me specifically?logic340 said: It looked like she wanted to vote u or Claire but she chose Cross instead (after seeing that u had already been voted) and the message next to the vote felt a little bit strange and that made me a little bit aware of her, so I thought of seeing her reaction.amberwillow said: What are you implying here?Oh why so why so? Looks like u were on mood to vote logic or Claire? dont remember if there were other dog peeps Don't want unneeded attention? I felt you insinuated that since she didn't vote me or Claire because one of us may be her partner. Is that what your line of questioning thereafter was about or did you think she slipped in a different way? That sounds like a weird conclusion for you to come to? Now if you are suspecting RE of protecting a scum buddy (me or Claire). Then it makes sense. If I'm her partner she can use the dog lover pardon to not have to vote for me etc. But if that is the case she could have just voted Claire? If Claire was her partner she could have me? But I had a vote and might bring questions that way so she voted Crossbell? You got all that from that opening post? So basically for this to make any sense RE would have to be protecting Claire her teammate and not want to comment on me due to a vote already being there. Why not just place and RVS and not say anything about the dog lovers? I am having trouble seeing this as a scum slip can you explain it to me further? Geez, the more u say the more it feels that u want me to think of u two as scumbuddies. I am not sure what u missed, but I am not suspecting her anymore (at least on such a big scale). If that is the case then yes, I think it would have been more likely of her to vote Claire then, but she didn't. But I didn't really suspect her to be a scumbuddies with either of u, I was more inclined to think that she is taking care of her image. I didn't get all that from just that post but it was the first thing what caught my attention and then I presented her the questions that were raised from her replies. Not necessary, she could have tried to protect either if it was like your theory. That post itself wasn't the one that bothered me most, it was her replies, I didn't go that deep like you two and her being mafias. I am not sure what else to add here besides what was already said. We kinda resolved that matter already, so now it looks like u want me to keep focusing on her when I had already said that I am planning to look at other susp people. Anw, lemme find some links when I am back from rehearsal if ull still want it, or just check again our convo 2. I didn't miss anything I was trying to understand where you were coming from with you question because it was so open ended that I could come to the conclusions I did. I though you were inferring that her and I or her and Claire were a team so I asked you to clarify it. Not sure how not voting me was taking care of her image can you elaborate on that. second person on an RVS train usually doesn't get flack shti grrr is 4th saying nothing and is under no pressure with less than 10 posts and little content or game solving anything. 3. This one is from my PoV I am town so the only way it makes sense is if Claire is her teammate. Keeping up appearances that early seems unlikely to me. 4. I followed your conversation which is why I had a few questions for clarification. I town read you slightly but those questions needed to be answered for me to feel more comfortable. I kind of get a t/t vibe from your interaction with RE as I think mafia wouldn't have made the dog part which drew your attention. The voting for a reason thing is weird though since there really is no reason to vote during RVS unless you have preconceived bias there. I am not asking you to look back into RE though she drew my attention while I was trying to talk to you about where you were coming from by butting into our conversation. You think so? Well I was mafia ages ago, but I remember being cautious of each of my post as to not mess up something. If that was the case with her or someone else, then I wouldn't really be surprised if they were to think about appearances then. Hm, how to say.. At first is RVS, where people get reactions from votes and if the 2nd person right away voted the same person like 1st then some people might come in questioning and commenting u "why did u vote them when they already have a vote on them. Wouldn't it be more meaningful to vote another person so that we would get more info from people?" and such. Is it clearlier now? Does t/t mean town/town? S/S = Scum-Scum T/T = Town-Town T/S = Town-Scum Hmmmm *checks the beginning of the day* *check what ya wrote again* I am bit lost, what are u implying? That Rosie and Grape should be checked? Good, look into me. It's a bit annoying you're claiming that I'm butting into your conversation when the conversation was literally about me and amberwilow's interaction. You claim that you aren't sure about our alignment but ask her about it and not me? Why? Can you expand on this? We don't have much time till phase and we need to you to focus on securing a lynch |
Mar 22, 2017 1:26 PM
#714
Grapefruit21 said: I totally agree with you grapefruit I said the vote count was gross a long time ago think I asked you about it?This vote count is exactly the type of thing that we need to avoid. @Oyasumi_Rosie @amberwillow not acceptable to not be voting with 40 minutes left in the phase. @Re1031 @Sollux16 @Lam-b @Grrr if you're online you need to either going a main wagon or give us a compelling reason to follow your vote. |
Proud Administrator of the D Gray Man FC and OnePunch-Man FC |
Mar 22, 2017 1:27 PM
#715
RE1031 said: U have a point here, I gotta saylogic340 said: amberwillow said: logic340 said: I meant that she might think that it might be suspicious, I dunno if it would. Your, Rosie's and Grape's situation is bit different from what I am talking about cuz votes are more related to the previous game not this one, so it gives a different feel I suppose.amberwillow said: No you said the second person who votes right after someone else would look suspicious. Well we have two examples of that in Rosie and Grapefruit who garnered no suspicion for jumping quickly to the second seat on the train. Not implying anything just saying we have a real situation to compare against you hypothetical one. logic340 said: M8, u started it xd that's why I didn't want to focus on RE anymore and go to a hypothesis word when I am not susp of her anymore ;Damberwillow said: logic340 said: I get it why it felt nitpicky my first question actually was of this kind, cuz I wanted to get a reaction But nah, I was thinking about how she appears from her point, not about her protecting one of u.amberwillow said: logic340 said: I think u are starting to misinterpret me. I didn't say that she would be in trouble, I said that from her point of view it might have appeared to her that it would be risky to get in a position where she would be questioned. I don't know what she felt, that's why I started asking those questions.amberwillow said: So you think that RE felt she would be put in a bad spot if she voted me right after Crossbell did? So the post about giving Dog Lovers a reprieve was her way of staying off my train? logic340 said: That was/is a possibility. But to be more specific, I was thinking that she might not want to be put in a badspot like be questioned if she was to vote u, because there was already a vote on u.amberwillow said: Basically what I took from your initial question to her was that she was trying to keep pressure off of me (her scum buddy) or possibly Claire due to the whole Dogs thing. logic340 said: That's what I thought. But later when we were talking how I understand she meant that it wasn't the case why she voted Cross and not Claire (or how I thought u). She claimed that she had a reason for voting Cross even though she didn't tell it at that moment. On this specific part we kinda agreed to disagree. I still can't be sure if she said it truthfully and probably I won't know until game ends, but what she said sounded relatively honest to me.amberwillow said: I agree with the first part she did say she knew where to vote then vote cross with her message of giving us a reprieve. Do you suspect that was to keep pressure off of a teammate? and me specifically?logic340 said: It looked like she wanted to vote u or Claire but she chose Cross instead (after seeing that u had already been voted) and the message next to the vote felt a little bit strange and that made me a little bit aware of her, so I thought of seeing her reaction.amberwillow said: What are you implying here?Oh why so why so? Looks like u were on mood to vote logic or Claire? dont remember if there were other dog peeps Don't want unneeded attention? I felt you insinuated that since she didn't vote me or Claire because one of us may be her partner. Is that what your line of questioning thereafter was about or did you think she slipped in a different way? That sounds like a weird conclusion for you to come to? Now if you are suspecting RE of protecting a scum buddy (me or Claire). Then it makes sense. If I'm her partner she can use the dog lover pardon to not have to vote for me etc. But if that is the case she could have just voted Claire? If Claire was her partner she could have me? But I had a vote and might bring questions that way so she voted Crossbell? You got all that from that opening post? So basically for this to make any sense RE would have to be protecting Claire her teammate and not want to comment on me due to a vote already being there. Why not just place and RVS and not say anything about the dog lovers? I am having trouble seeing this as a scum slip can you explain it to me further? Geez, the more u say the more it feels that u want me to think of u two as scumbuddies. I am not sure what u missed, but I am not suspecting her anymore (at least on such a big scale). If that is the case then yes, I think it would have been more likely of her to vote Claire then, but she didn't. But I didn't really suspect her to be a scumbuddies with either of u, I was more inclined to think that she is taking care of her image. I didn't get all that from just that post but it was the first thing what caught my attention and then I presented her the questions that were raised from her replies. Not necessary, she could have tried to protect either if it was like your theory. That post itself wasn't the one that bothered me most, it was her replies, I didn't go that deep like you two and her being mafias. I am not sure what else to add here besides what was already said. We kinda resolved that matter already, so now it looks like u want me to keep focusing on her when I had already said that I am planning to look at other susp people. Anw, lemme find some links when I am back from rehearsal if ull still want it, or just check again our convo 2. I didn't miss anything I was trying to understand where you were coming from with you question because it was so open ended that I could come to the conclusions I did. I though you were inferring that her and I or her and Claire were a team so I asked you to clarify it. Not sure how not voting me was taking care of her image can you elaborate on that. second person on an RVS train usually doesn't get flack shti grrr is 4th saying nothing and is under no pressure with less than 10 posts and little content or game solving anything. 3. This one is from my PoV I am town so the only way it makes sense is if Claire is her teammate. Keeping up appearances that early seems unlikely to me. 4. I followed your conversation which is why I had a few questions for clarification. I town read you slightly but those questions needed to be answered for me to feel more comfortable. I kind of get a t/t vibe from your interaction with RE as I think mafia wouldn't have made the dog part which drew your attention. The voting for a reason thing is weird though since there really is no reason to vote during RVS unless you have preconceived bias there. I am not asking you to look back into RE though she drew my attention while I was trying to talk to you about where you were coming from by butting into our conversation. You think so? Well I was mafia ages ago, but I remember being cautious of each of my post as to not mess up something. If that was the case with her or someone else, then I wouldn't really be surprised if they were to think about appearances then. Hm, how to say.. At first is RVS, where people get reactions from votes and if the 2nd person right away voted the same person like 1st then some people might come in questioning and commenting u "why did u vote them when they already have a vote on them. Wouldn't it be more meaningful to vote another person so that we would get more info from people?" and such. Is it clearlier now? Does t/t mean town/town? S/S = Scum-Scum T/T = Town-Town T/S = Town-Scum Hmmmm *checks the beginning of the day* *check what ya wrote again* I am bit lost, what are u implying? That Rosie and Grape should be checked? Good, look into me. It's a bit annoying you're claiming that I'm butting into your conversation when the conversation was literally about me and amberwilow's interaction. You claim that you aren't sure about our alignment but ask her about it and not me? Why? |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
Mar 22, 2017 1:27 PM
#716
Oyasumi_Rosie said: this is quite interesting so why do you trust the three at the top?logic340 said: hmmm 3 you won't lynch today and 3 you're willing to lynch -Unwilling Myself Crossbell Sollux Why? Because you said name three people. -Willing You Grapefruit CP I find that you three are causing the most confusion in this game so far. I think one of you guys it will make the game easier to understand while giving us something to analyse the following phases. |
Proud Administrator of the D Gray Man FC and OnePunch-Man FC |
Mar 22, 2017 1:28 PM
#718
logic340 said: Grapefruit21 said: I totally agree with you grapefruit I said the vote count was gross a long time ago think I asked you about it?This vote count is exactly the type of thing that we need to avoid. @Oyasumi_Rosie @amberwillow not acceptable to not be voting with 40 minutes left in the phase. @Re1031 @Sollux16 @Lam-b @Grrr if you're online you need to either going a main wagon or give us a compelling reason to follow your vote. Yup I just forgot to include that in my morning catch up post. Give me your elevator pitch on Claire as scum please. |
Mar 22, 2017 1:28 PM
#719
Grapefruit21 said: Why would I join a main wagon? Like I stated earlier, I don't feel strongly enough about the others yet. As for Penta, I don't like the way things are going with them. Earlier on when people were asking for their reads or even just a little bit of what they were thinking, they said things like "no thanks, maybe later." and wouldn't share. That wasn't helping anyone in the slightest. Penta is definitely my main maf lean atm, so I'm not changing my vote until I'm convinced otherwise. I'm doing some back reading now, if I find anything more, I'll let you know... assuming I don't run out of time.This vote count is exactly the type of thing that we need to avoid. @Oyasumi_Rosie @amberwillow not acceptable to not be voting with 40 minutes left in the phase. @Re1031 @Sollux16 @Lam-b @Grrr if you're online you need to either going a main wagon or give us a compelling reason to follow your vote. |
Mar 22, 2017 1:31 PM
#720
Hmmm, I will go with this vote: CorruptedPurity |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
Mar 22, 2017 1:31 PM
#721
Sollux16 said: Grapefruit21 said: Why would I join a main wagon? Like I stated earlier, I don't feel strongly enough about the others yet. As for Penta, I don't like the way things are going with them. Earlier on when people were asking for their reads or even just a little bit of what they were thinking, they said things like "no thanks, maybe later." and wouldn't share. That wasn't helping anyone in the slightest. Penta is definitely my main maf lean atm, so I'm not changing my vote until I'm convinced otherwise. I'm doing some back reading now, if I find anything more, I'll let you know... assuming I don't run out of time.This vote count is exactly the type of thing that we need to avoid. @Oyasumi_Rosie @amberwillow not acceptable to not be voting with 40 minutes left in the phase. @Re1031 @Sollux16 @Lam-b @Grrr if you're online you need to either going a main wagon or give us a compelling reason to follow your vote. They were doing that with the intention to catch me out for my bolded post about lurking and not sharing opinions. They were being over the top about not sharing to see how I'd react. After that Penta proceeded to share their reads. Does that change your opinion at all? And you don't have to join a top wagon. Just give your opinion on them and try to persuade us to join you if you believe your alternative is better. |
Mar 22, 2017 1:32 PM
#722
Why? Don't need a wall just a short explanation. |
Mar 22, 2017 1:33 PM
#723
Grapefruit21 said: RE1031 said: logic340 said: amberwillow said: fair enough, I can see where you're coming from there with the difference. RE is someone I need to look at since she got my attention butting into or conversation but not site if I'll have time to review her before EoD. Currently on mobile headed home from work.logic340 said: I meant that she might think that it might be suspicious, I dunno if it would. Your, Rosie's and Grape's situation is bit different from what I am talking about cuz votes are more related to the previous game not this one, so it gives a different feel I suppose.amberwillow said: No you said the second person who votes right after someone else would look suspicious. Well we have two examples of that in Rosie and Grapefruit who garnered no suspicion for jumping quickly to the second seat on the train. Not implying anything just saying we have a real situation to compare against you hypothetical one. logic340 said: M8, u started it xd that's why I didn't want to focus on RE anymore and go to a hypothesis word when I am not susp of her anymore ;Damberwillow said: logic340 said: I get it why it felt nitpicky my first question actually was of this kind, cuz I wanted to get a reaction But nah, I was thinking about how she appears from her point, not about her protecting one of u.amberwillow said: logic340 said: I think u are starting to misinterpret me. I didn't say that she would be in trouble, I said that from her point of view it might have appeared to her that it would be risky to get in a position where she would be questioned. I don't know what she felt, that's why I started asking those questions.amberwillow said: So you think that RE felt she would be put in a bad spot if she voted me right after Crossbell did? So the post about giving Dog Lovers a reprieve was her way of staying off my train? logic340 said: That was/is a possibility. But to be more specific, I was thinking that she might not want to be put in a badspot like be questioned if she was to vote u, because there was already a vote on u.amberwillow said: Basically what I took from your initial question to her was that she was trying to keep pressure off of me (her scum buddy) or possibly Claire due to the whole Dogs thing. logic340 said: That's what I thought. But later when we were talking how I understand she meant that it wasn't the case why she voted Cross and not Claire (or how I thought u). She claimed that she had a reason for voting Cross even though she didn't tell it at that moment. On this specific part we kinda agreed to disagree. I still can't be sure if she said it truthfully and probably I won't know until game ends, but what she said sounded relatively honest to me.amberwillow said: I agree with the first part she did say she knew where to vote then vote cross with her message of giving us a reprieve. Do you suspect that was to keep pressure off of a teammate? and me specifically?logic340 said: It looked like she wanted to vote u or Claire but she chose Cross instead (after seeing that u had already been voted) and the message next to the vote felt a little bit strange and that made me a little bit aware of her, so I thought of seeing her reaction.amberwillow said: What are you implying here?Oh why so why so? Looks like u were on mood to vote logic or Claire? dont remember if there were other dog peeps Don't want unneeded attention? I felt you insinuated that since she didn't vote me or Claire because one of us may be her partner. Is that what your line of questioning thereafter was about or did you think she slipped in a different way? That sounds like a weird conclusion for you to come to? Now if you are suspecting RE of protecting a scum buddy (me or Claire). Then it makes sense. If I'm her partner she can use the dog lover pardon to not have to vote for me etc. But if that is the case she could have just voted Claire? If Claire was her partner she could have me? But I had a vote and might bring questions that way so she voted Crossbell? You got all that from that opening post? So basically for this to make any sense RE would have to be protecting Claire her teammate and not want to comment on me due to a vote already being there. Why not just place and RVS and not say anything about the dog lovers? I am having trouble seeing this as a scum slip can you explain it to me further? Geez, the more u say the more it feels that u want me to think of u two as scumbuddies. I am not sure what u missed, but I am not suspecting her anymore (at least on such a big scale). If that is the case then yes, I think it would have been more likely of her to vote Claire then, but she didn't. But I didn't really suspect her to be a scumbuddies with either of u, I was more inclined to think that she is taking care of her image. I didn't get all that from just that post but it was the first thing what caught my attention and then I presented her the questions that were raised from her replies. Not necessary, she could have tried to protect either if it was like your theory. That post itself wasn't the one that bothered me most, it was her replies, I didn't go that deep like you two and her being mafias. I am not sure what else to add here besides what was already said. We kinda resolved that matter already, so now it looks like u want me to keep focusing on her when I had already said that I am planning to look at other susp people. Anw, lemme find some links when I am back from rehearsal if ull still want it, or just check again our convo 2. I didn't miss anything I was trying to understand where you were coming from with you question because it was so open ended that I could come to the conclusions I did. I though you were inferring that her and I or her and Claire were a team so I asked you to clarify it. Not sure how not voting me was taking care of her image can you elaborate on that. second person on an RVS train usually doesn't get flack shti grrr is 4th saying nothing and is under no pressure with less than 10 posts and little content or game solving anything. 3. This one is from my PoV I am town so the only way it makes sense is if Claire is her teammate. Keeping up appearances that early seems unlikely to me. 4. I followed your conversation which is why I had a few questions for clarification. I town read you slightly but those questions needed to be answered for me to feel more comfortable. I kind of get a t/t vibe from your interaction with RE as I think mafia wouldn't have made the dog part which drew your attention. The voting for a reason thing is weird though since there really is no reason to vote during RVS unless you have preconceived bias there. I am not asking you to look back into RE though she drew my attention while I was trying to talk to you about where you were coming from by butting into our conversation. You think so? Well I was mafia ages ago, but I remember being cautious of each of my post as to not mess up something. If that was the case with her or someone else, then I wouldn't really be surprised if they were to think about appearances then. Hm, how to say.. At first is RVS, where people get reactions from votes and if the 2nd person right away voted the same person like 1st then some people might come in questioning and commenting u "why did u vote them when they already have a vote on them. Wouldn't it be more meaningful to vote another person so that we would get more info from people?" and such. Is it clearlier now? Does t/t mean town/town? S/S = Scum-Scum T/T = Town-Town T/S = Town-Scum Hmmmm *checks the beginning of the day* *check what ya wrote again* I am bit lost, what are u implying? That Rosie and Grape should be checked? Good, look into me. It's a bit annoying you're claiming that I'm butting into your conversation when the conversation was literally about me and amberwilow's interaction. You claim that you aren't sure about our alignment but ask her about it and not me? Why? Can you expand on this? We don't have much time till phase and we need to you to focus on securing a lynch Couple pages back, logic was asking amberwillow why she was looking into me. I answered. Yeah.. I guess in a way I was butting in? But he was picking on it despite amberwillow backing off + he didn't seem very interested in my defense. |
...better to be hated for what you are than loved for something you are not. |
Mar 22, 2017 1:34 PM
#724
Like I said u and him are about equal to me. So I chose calm and collected him instead of jumpy you. Well I am interested to see what Cross will bring. I am wondering if it's about Claire, maybe I'll reconsider, will see Edit: word in a wrong place |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
Mar 22, 2017 1:35 PM
#725
RE1031 said: Grapefruit21 said: RE1031 said: logic340 said: amberwillow said: fair enough, I can see where you're coming from there with the difference. RE is someone I need to look at since she got my attention butting into or conversation but not site if I'll have time to review her before EoD. Currently on mobile headed home from work.logic340 said: I meant that she might think that it might be suspicious, I dunno if it would. Your, Rosie's and Grape's situation is bit different from what I am talking about cuz votes are more related to the previous game not this one, so it gives a different feel I suppose.amberwillow said: No you said the second person who votes right after someone else would look suspicious. Well we have two examples of that in Rosie and Grapefruit who garnered no suspicion for jumping quickly to the second seat on the train. Not implying anything just saying we have a real situation to compare against you hypothetical one. logic340 said: M8, u started it xd that's why I didn't want to focus on RE anymore and go to a hypothesis word when I am not susp of her anymore ;Damberwillow said: logic340 said: I get it why it felt nitpicky my first question actually was of this kind, cuz I wanted to get a reaction But nah, I was thinking about how she appears from her point, not about her protecting one of u.amberwillow said: logic340 said: I think u are starting to misinterpret me. I didn't say that she would be in trouble, I said that from her point of view it might have appeared to her that it would be risky to get in a position where she would be questioned. I don't know what she felt, that's why I started asking those questions.amberwillow said: So you think that RE felt she would be put in a bad spot if she voted me right after Crossbell did? So the post about giving Dog Lovers a reprieve was her way of staying off my train? logic340 said: That was/is a possibility. But to be more specific, I was thinking that she might not want to be put in a badspot like be questioned if she was to vote u, because there was already a vote on u.amberwillow said: Basically what I took from your initial question to her was that she was trying to keep pressure off of me (her scum buddy) or possibly Claire due to the whole Dogs thing. logic340 said: That's what I thought. But later when we were talking how I understand she meant that it wasn't the case why she voted Cross and not Claire (or how I thought u). She claimed that she had a reason for voting Cross even though she didn't tell it at that moment. On this specific part we kinda agreed to disagree. I still can't be sure if she said it truthfully and probably I won't know until game ends, but what she said sounded relatively honest to me.amberwillow said: I agree with the first part she did say she knew where to vote then vote cross with her message of giving us a reprieve. Do you suspect that was to keep pressure off of a teammate? and me specifically?logic340 said: It looked like she wanted to vote u or Claire but she chose Cross instead (after seeing that u had already been voted) and the message next to the vote felt a little bit strange and that made me a little bit aware of her, so I thought of seeing her reaction.amberwillow said: What are you implying here?Oh why so why so? Looks like u were on mood to vote logic or Claire? dont remember if there were other dog peeps Don't want unneeded attention? I felt you insinuated that since she didn't vote me or Claire because one of us may be her partner. Is that what your line of questioning thereafter was about or did you think she slipped in a different way? That sounds like a weird conclusion for you to come to? Now if you are suspecting RE of protecting a scum buddy (me or Claire). Then it makes sense. If I'm her partner she can use the dog lover pardon to not have to vote for me etc. But if that is the case she could have just voted Claire? If Claire was her partner she could have me? But I had a vote and might bring questions that way so she voted Crossbell? You got all that from that opening post? So basically for this to make any sense RE would have to be protecting Claire her teammate and not want to comment on me due to a vote already being there. Why not just place and RVS and not say anything about the dog lovers? I am having trouble seeing this as a scum slip can you explain it to me further? Geez, the more u say the more it feels that u want me to think of u two as scumbuddies. I am not sure what u missed, but I am not suspecting her anymore (at least on such a big scale). If that is the case then yes, I think it would have been more likely of her to vote Claire then, but she didn't. But I didn't really suspect her to be a scumbuddies with either of u, I was more inclined to think that she is taking care of her image. I didn't get all that from just that post but it was the first thing what caught my attention and then I presented her the questions that were raised from her replies. Not necessary, she could have tried to protect either if it was like your theory. That post itself wasn't the one that bothered me most, it was her replies, I didn't go that deep like you two and her being mafias. I am not sure what else to add here besides what was already said. We kinda resolved that matter already, so now it looks like u want me to keep focusing on her when I had already said that I am planning to look at other susp people. Anw, lemme find some links when I am back from rehearsal if ull still want it, or just check again our convo 2. I didn't miss anything I was trying to understand where you were coming from with you question because it was so open ended that I could come to the conclusions I did. I though you were inferring that her and I or her and Claire were a team so I asked you to clarify it. Not sure how not voting me was taking care of her image can you elaborate on that. second person on an RVS train usually doesn't get flack shti grrr is 4th saying nothing and is under no pressure with less than 10 posts and little content or game solving anything. 3. This one is from my PoV I am town so the only way it makes sense is if Claire is her teammate. Keeping up appearances that early seems unlikely to me. 4. I followed your conversation which is why I had a few questions for clarification. I town read you slightly but those questions needed to be answered for me to feel more comfortable. I kind of get a t/t vibe from your interaction with RE as I think mafia wouldn't have made the dog part which drew your attention. The voting for a reason thing is weird though since there really is no reason to vote during RVS unless you have preconceived bias there. I am not asking you to look back into RE though she drew my attention while I was trying to talk to you about where you were coming from by butting into our conversation. You think so? Well I was mafia ages ago, but I remember being cautious of each of my post as to not mess up something. If that was the case with her or someone else, then I wouldn't really be surprised if they were to think about appearances then. Hm, how to say.. At first is RVS, where people get reactions from votes and if the 2nd person right away voted the same person like 1st then some people might come in questioning and commenting u "why did u vote them when they already have a vote on them. Wouldn't it be more meaningful to vote another person so that we would get more info from people?" and such. Is it clearlier now? Does t/t mean town/town? S/S = Scum-Scum T/T = Town-Town T/S = Town-Scum Hmmmm *checks the beginning of the day* *check what ya wrote again* I am bit lost, what are u implying? That Rosie and Grape should be checked? Good, look into me. It's a bit annoying you're claiming that I'm butting into your conversation when the conversation was literally about me and amberwilow's interaction. You claim that you aren't sure about our alignment but ask her about it and not me? Why? Can you expand on this? We don't have much time till phase and we need to you to focus on securing a lynch Couple pages back, logic was asking amberwillow why she was looking into me. I answered. Yeah.. I guess in a way I was butting in? But he was picking on it despite amberwillow backing off + he didn't seem very interested in my defense. So do you think this makes logic scum? Are you going to move your vote to him? I agree with your points, but what do you want to do about them? |
Mar 22, 2017 1:35 PM
#726
Grapefruit21 said: she's been blindly focused on me and CP to the point that it feels like retaliation more than anything else. She doesn't feel genuine she's not using her meds like she normally does but she's closed off. I feel like she only wants to lynch grrr because he said that CP was Town cleaed? She avoided the wisdom spot meta multiple times and have me the shortest possible answer. #118-120logic340 said: Grapefruit21 said: This vote count is exactly the type of thing that we need to avoid. @Oyasumi_Rosie @amberwillow not acceptable to not be voting with 40 minutes left in the phase. @Re1031 @Sollux16 @Lam-b @Grrr if you're online you need to either going a main wagon or give us a compelling reason to follow your vote. Yup I just forgot to include that in my morning catch up post. Give me your elevator pitch on Claire as scum please. Triple post all pretty much saying the same thing all saying nothing about this game. |
Proud Administrator of the D Gray Man FC and OnePunch-Man FC |
Mar 22, 2017 1:37 PM
#727
OK so I have somewhat caught up with the thread, but I'm going to catch up more fully during the Night. Reads: vv: Crossbell Lamby - is unusually more cognizant and more interested in scumhunting than what I normally see from Lamby. Plus, had that huge town-tell with trying to improve and get better in response to the massive scum victories we have recently. PentaFlare - this reads as active, engaged, town!Penta to me. I like his crypticness; I like his case on CP because it feels like he actually believes in it. He's actively scumhunting and I think that's a good look for him. v: Logic - this reads as normal, active, scumhunting! Logic to me but he got off of a nice scum win, so that's why he's in this pile instead of the vv pile. I'm going to approach my read on him with trepidation. Grapefruit - I like his focus on the wagons a lot, since that was something I did in FF15. His posts read as though they're thoughtful and cogent when scumhunting. He could be pocketing me, since I haven't seen his scum game yet, but I'll re-evaluate when the time comes. CP - Gun to my head read town, though he's probably the hardest person to read for me because some of his posts feel kind of manufactured but other posts read as fairly genuine. Need to double check though at Night assuming he doesn't get lynched? I feel like most people are scumreading him due to being scum in other games versus being scum in others. n: amberwillow - Need to reread, she's been active and scumhunting but not many posts of hers have resonated with me. I'll do a deep dive on her Tonight if I have the time. Sollux - Hasn't really made much contribution to the gamestate thus far? RE1031 - Another player in the amberwillow camp I need to reread. followind - Hasn't made much contribution to the gamestate. grr - Anti-town player. Smack him with a vig shot, please. s: Rosie - I've basically read/skimmed the entire game and she has left zero impression on my brain. Plus, zero scumhunting. I will look at her more over Night. Claire - The wagon hop was not a good look for her and she's been mostly defensive and OMGUS'd logic. My read on her depends on the read of CP though. |
Mar 22, 2017 1:37 PM
#728
Grapefruit21 said: or do they say, you know this is within the range of penta's scum game why easy it up so quickly? Not to be rude but I think this is what people mean when they say you like throwing yourself in pockets.Sollux16 said: Grapefruit21 said: This vote count is exactly the type of thing that we need to avoid. @Oyasumi_Rosie @amberwillow not acceptable to not be voting with 40 minutes left in the phase. @Re1031 @Sollux16 @Lam-b @Grrr if you're online you need to either going a main wagon or give us a compelling reason to follow your vote. They were doing that with the intention to catch me out for my bolded post about lurking and not sharing opinions. They were being over the top about not sharing to see how I'd react. After that Penta proceeded to share their reads. Does that change your opinion at all? And you don't have to join a top wagon. Just give your opinion on them and try to persuade us to join you if you believe your alternative is better. |
Proud Administrator of the D Gray Man FC and OnePunch-Man FC |
Mar 22, 2017 1:37 PM
#729
Grapefruit21 said: RE1031 said: Grapefruit21 said: RE1031 said: logic340 said: amberwillow said: fair enough, I can see where you're coming from there with the difference. RE is someone I need to look at since she got my attention butting into or conversation but not site if I'll have time to review her before EoD. Currently on mobile headed home from work.logic340 said: I meant that she might think that it might be suspicious, I dunno if it would. Your, Rosie's and Grape's situation is bit different from what I am talking about cuz votes are more related to the previous game not this one, so it gives a different feel I suppose.amberwillow said: No you said the second person who votes right after someone else would look suspicious. Well we have two examples of that in Rosie and Grapefruit who garnered no suspicion for jumping quickly to the second seat on the train. Not implying anything just saying we have a real situation to compare against you hypothetical one. logic340 said: M8, u started it xd that's why I didn't want to focus on RE anymore and go to a hypothesis word when I am not susp of her anymore ;Damberwillow said: logic340 said: I get it why it felt nitpicky my first question actually was of this kind, cuz I wanted to get a reaction But nah, I was thinking about how she appears from her point, not about her protecting one of u.amberwillow said: logic340 said: I think u are starting to misinterpret me. I didn't say that she would be in trouble, I said that from her point of view it might have appeared to her that it would be risky to get in a position where she would be questioned. I don't know what she felt, that's why I started asking those questions.amberwillow said: So you think that RE felt she would be put in a bad spot if she voted me right after Crossbell did? So the post about giving Dog Lovers a reprieve was her way of staying off my train? logic340 said: That was/is a possibility. But to be more specific, I was thinking that she might not want to be put in a badspot like be questioned if she was to vote u, because there was already a vote on u.amberwillow said: Basically what I took from your initial question to her was that she was trying to keep pressure off of me (her scum buddy) or possibly Claire due to the whole Dogs thing. logic340 said: That's what I thought. But later when we were talking how I understand she meant that it wasn't the case why she voted Cross and not Claire (or how I thought u). She claimed that she had a reason for voting Cross even though she didn't tell it at that moment. On this specific part we kinda agreed to disagree. I still can't be sure if she said it truthfully and probably I won't know until game ends, but what she said sounded relatively honest to me.amberwillow said: I agree with the first part she did say she knew where to vote then vote cross with her message of giving us a reprieve. Do you suspect that was to keep pressure off of a teammate? and me specifically?logic340 said: It looked like she wanted to vote u or Claire but she chose Cross instead (after seeing that u had already been voted) and the message next to the vote felt a little bit strange and that made me a little bit aware of her, so I thought of seeing her reaction.amberwillow said: What are you implying here?Oh why so why so? Looks like u were on mood to vote logic or Claire? dont remember if there were other dog peeps Don't want unneeded attention? I felt you insinuated that since she didn't vote me or Claire because one of us may be her partner. Is that what your line of questioning thereafter was about or did you think she slipped in a different way? That sounds like a weird conclusion for you to come to? Now if you are suspecting RE of protecting a scum buddy (me or Claire). Then it makes sense. If I'm her partner she can use the dog lover pardon to not have to vote for me etc. But if that is the case she could have just voted Claire? If Claire was her partner she could have me? But I had a vote and might bring questions that way so she voted Crossbell? You got all that from that opening post? So basically for this to make any sense RE would have to be protecting Claire her teammate and not want to comment on me due to a vote already being there. Why not just place and RVS and not say anything about the dog lovers? I am having trouble seeing this as a scum slip can you explain it to me further? Geez, the more u say the more it feels that u want me to think of u two as scumbuddies. I am not sure what u missed, but I am not suspecting her anymore (at least on such a big scale). If that is the case then yes, I think it would have been more likely of her to vote Claire then, but she didn't. But I didn't really suspect her to be a scumbuddies with either of u, I was more inclined to think that she is taking care of her image. I didn't get all that from just that post but it was the first thing what caught my attention and then I presented her the questions that were raised from her replies. Not necessary, she could have tried to protect either if it was like your theory. That post itself wasn't the one that bothered me most, it was her replies, I didn't go that deep like you two and her being mafias. I am not sure what else to add here besides what was already said. We kinda resolved that matter already, so now it looks like u want me to keep focusing on her when I had already said that I am planning to look at other susp people. Anw, lemme find some links when I am back from rehearsal if ull still want it, or just check again our convo 2. I didn't miss anything I was trying to understand where you were coming from with you question because it was so open ended that I could come to the conclusions I did. I though you were inferring that her and I or her and Claire were a team so I asked you to clarify it. Not sure how not voting me was taking care of her image can you elaborate on that. second person on an RVS train usually doesn't get flack shti grrr is 4th saying nothing and is under no pressure with less than 10 posts and little content or game solving anything. 3. This one is from my PoV I am town so the only way it makes sense is if Claire is her teammate. Keeping up appearances that early seems unlikely to me. 4. I followed your conversation which is why I had a few questions for clarification. I town read you slightly but those questions needed to be answered for me to feel more comfortable. I kind of get a t/t vibe from your interaction with RE as I think mafia wouldn't have made the dog part which drew your attention. The voting for a reason thing is weird though since there really is no reason to vote during RVS unless you have preconceived bias there. I am not asking you to look back into RE though she drew my attention while I was trying to talk to you about where you were coming from by butting into our conversation. You think so? Well I was mafia ages ago, but I remember being cautious of each of my post as to not mess up something. If that was the case with her or someone else, then I wouldn't really be surprised if they were to think about appearances then. Hm, how to say.. At first is RVS, where people get reactions from votes and if the 2nd person right away voted the same person like 1st then some people might come in questioning and commenting u "why did u vote them when they already have a vote on them. Wouldn't it be more meaningful to vote another person so that we would get more info from people?" and such. Is it clearlier now? Does t/t mean town/town? S/S = Scum-Scum T/T = Town-Town T/S = Town-Scum Hmmmm *checks the beginning of the day* *check what ya wrote again* I am bit lost, what are u implying? That Rosie and Grape should be checked? Good, look into me. It's a bit annoying you're claiming that I'm butting into your conversation when the conversation was literally about me and amberwilow's interaction. You claim that you aren't sure about our alignment but ask her about it and not me? Why? Can you expand on this? We don't have much time till phase and we need to you to focus on securing a lynch Couple pages back, logic was asking amberwillow why she was looking into me. I answered. Yeah.. I guess in a way I was butting in? But he was picking on it despite amberwillow backing off + he didn't seem very interested in my defense. So do you think this makes logic scum? Are you going to move your vote to him? I agree with your points, but what do you want to do about them? Nothing for now. It's annoying but not entirely scummy. Was going to leave it alone but it got a little unbearable. I'm not very willing to jump the main trains unless it's to break a tie.. I do feel CorruptedPurity is town this time around, but at the same time, he's a dangerous player. |
...better to be hated for what you are than loved for something you are not. |
Mar 22, 2017 1:38 PM
#730
Oyasumi_Rosie said: Why are you unwilling to lynch me or sollux? I haven't made a very large contribution to the gamestate due to my schedule, and Sollux hasn't really posted a lot yet.logic340 said: hmmm 3 you won't lynch today and 3 you're willing to lynch -Unwilling Myself Crossbell Sollux |
Mar 22, 2017 1:39 PM
#731
logic340 said: Grapefruit21 said: she's been blindly focused on me and CP to the point that it feels like retaliation more than anything else. She doesn't feel genuine she's not using her meds like she normally does but she's closed off. I feel like she only wants to lynch grrr because he said that CP was Town cleaed? She avoided the wisdom spot meta multiple times and have me the shortest possible answer. #118-120logic340 said: Grapefruit21 said: I totally agree with you grapefruit I said the vote count was gross a long time ago think I asked you about it?This vote count is exactly the type of thing that we need to avoid. @Oyasumi_Rosie @amberwillow not acceptable to not be voting with 40 minutes left in the phase. @Re1031 @Sollux16 @Lam-b @Grrr if you're online you need to either going a main wagon or give us a compelling reason to follow your vote. Yup I just forgot to include that in my morning catch up post. Give me your elevator pitch on Claire as scum please. Triple post all pretty much saying the same thing all saying nothing about this game. I agree with most of your points but disagree with your conclusion. If Claire were scum why would she be playing emotionally and zeroed in on you two? I think the play you are describing is incredibly more likely to come from town. Scum can get you back easily in other ways if she is that upset about the previous game. I don't think she avoided using meta so much as didn't have a strong opinion. |
Mar 22, 2017 1:40 PM
#732
Crossbell said: As in: if CP is goodie then Claire is baddie and vice versa?s: Rosie - I've basically read/skimmed the entire game and she has left zero impression on my brain. Plus, zero scumhunting. I will look at her more over Night. Claire - The wagon hop was not a good look for her and she's been mostly defensive and OMGUS'd logic. My read on her depends on the read of CP though. |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
Mar 22, 2017 1:41 PM
#733
So tl;dr: 1. I would be willing to support the CP wagon if needed, but it's not a lynch I really support. I get the feeling that he's a competent player, and I like to leave those players alive for later regardless of alignment. 2. I would be willing to lynch Rosie or Claire. I guess I would be willing to lynch grr, but he's an infinitely better vig shot than a lynch. If we lynch him and he flips town, then we get zero information. So he's not a lynch I super strongly support but I support vigging 100%. |
Mar 22, 2017 1:42 PM
#734
amberwillow said: If CP is town, Claire goes way up in scum equity I think.Crossbell said: As in: if CP is goodie then Claire is baddie and vice versa?s: Rosie - I've basically read/skimmed the entire game and she has left zero impression on my brain. Plus, zero scumhunting. I will look at her more over Night. Claire - The wagon hop was not a good look for her and she's been mostly defensive and OMGUS'd logic. My read on her depends on the read of CP though. Because that bandwagon screamed "I'm hopping on a mislynch". If CP is scum, then Claire is probably town? |
Mar 22, 2017 1:44 PM
#736
Crossbell said: I dunno, I am between the peeps that I mentioned. all 3 of them look like a relatively good lynch candidates that would give us infoamber, why are you voting CorruptedPurity? |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
Mar 22, 2017 1:44 PM
#737
Sollux16 said: This post is bad, but I'm not necessarily sure if it's scummy bad.Grapefruit21 said: Why would I join a main wagon? Like I stated earlier, I don't feel strongly enough about the others yet. As for Penta, I don't like the way things are going with them. Earlier on when people were asking for their reads or even just a little bit of what they were thinking, they said things like "no thanks, maybe later." and wouldn't share. That wasn't helping anyone in the slightest. Penta is definitely my main maf lean atm, so I'm not changing my vote until I'm convinced otherwise. I'm doing some back reading now, if I find anything more, I'll let you know... assuming I don't run out of time.This vote count is exactly the type of thing that we need to avoid. @Oyasumi_Rosie @amberwillow not acceptable to not be voting with 40 minutes left in the phase. @Re1031 @Sollux16 @Lam-b @Grrr if you're online you need to either going a main wagon or give us a compelling reason to follow your vote. Feels "too scummy to be scum" here, heh. |
Mar 22, 2017 1:45 PM
#738
Vote: Rosie Work got busy and I can't post any more till phase. This just feels right. As cross pointed out her top 3 town is very very strange. |
Mar 22, 2017 1:45 PM
#739
amberwillow said: Our main goal should be to lynch scum. Why are you focused on "gaining info"?Crossbell said: I dunno, I am between the peeps that I mentioned. all 3 of them look like a relatively good lynch candidates that would give us infoamber, why are you voting CorruptedPurity? Let me tell you this. 1. A town mislynch does not really give us a large amount of information. 2. A scum lynch gives us WAY more information than a town mislynch does, because we can look back at interactions. |
Mar 22, 2017 1:47 PM
#742
🐭 Vote Count 1.8 🐭 CorruptedPurity (3) PentaFlare, _Claire_, amberwillow Oyasumi_Rosie (3) RE1031, Grapefruit21, Crossbell Grrr (2) followind, CorruptedPurity _Claire_ (1) Logic340 Logic340 (1) Grrr RE1031 (1) Lam-B PentaFlare (1) Sollux16 Not Voting Oyasumi_Rosie 🐭 Vote History 🐭 logic340: Grapefruit21 > unvote > _Claire_ > Grapefruit21 > _Claire_ Crossbell: Logic340 > _Claire_ > Oyasumi_Rosie Oyasumi_Rosie: Grapefruit21 RE1031: Crossbell > amberwillow > unvote > Oyasumi_Rosie _Claire_: Logic340 > CorruptedPurity > Grrr > CorruptedPurity Grapefruit21: Logic340 > RE1031 > Oyasumi_Rosie > RE1031 > CorruptedPurity > Oyasumi_Rosie Grrr: Logic340 PentaFlare: Grapefruit21 > CorruptedPurity Sollux16: followind > unvote > PentaFlare amberwillow: RE1031 > unvote > CorruptedPurity Lam-B: RE1031 CorruptedPurity: Grapefruit21, Grrr followind: Grrr Mod notes: (ΦωΦ) 🕒 Countdown to Night 1 🕒 |
Mar 22, 2017 1:47 PM
#743
Crossbell said: Yeah, but who is scum?amberwillow said: Our main goal should be to lynch scum. Why are you focused on "gaining info"?Crossbell said: amber, why are you voting CorruptedPurity? Let me tell you this. 1. A town mislynch does not really give us a large amount of information. 2. A scum lynch gives us WAY more information than a town mislynch does, because we can look back at interactions. Like, taking CP and Claire, they are both suspicious. But CP is more likely to be lynched unless someone changes their vote |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
Mar 22, 2017 1:48 PM
#744
Her unwillingness to lynch me feels like she /knows/ I'm town, and I don't understand her scumreads. Why Logic/Grapefruit/CP? Those three are all in my townie pile. |
Mar 22, 2017 1:48 PM
#745
It's a tie now :| |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
Mar 22, 2017 1:49 PM
#746
I respect that unvote Vote: Rosie She's either having a really off game or she's scum I'm feeling the latter |
Proud Administrator of the D Gray Man FC and OnePunch-Man FC |
Mar 22, 2017 1:49 PM
#747
Crossbell said: Oh? That could be possible. But she might just trust your reputation?Her unwillingness to lynch me feels like she /knows/ I'm town, and I don't understand her scumreads. Why Logic/Grapefruit/CP? Those three are all in my townie pile. Very well, let's go with this then. change vote: Rosie |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
Mar 22, 2017 1:50 PM
#748
Grrr (2) followind, CorruptedPurity _Claire_ (1) Logic340 Logic340 (1) Grrr RE1031 (1) Lam-B PentaFlare (1) Sollux16 Not Voting Oyasumi_Rosie ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
Mar 22, 2017 1:50 PM
#749
@Oyasumi_Rosie - please claim. |
More topics from this board
» [GAME] (* ̄・ ̄)ノ Count to 30 Before a Slightly Inebriated Staff Member Posts! v4 ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Togs - Jul 2, 2017 |
2866 |
by fausifahrial
»»
Nov 7, 2023 9:07 AM |
|
» [GAME] Last Letter Game ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )grave_robber - Sep 9, 2014 |
8750 |
by fausifahrial
»»
Nov 7, 2023 9:06 AM |
|
» Count To 7777 V3 ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Lambtron - May 15, 2018 |
1159 |
by fausifahrial
»»
Nov 7, 2023 9:06 AM |
|
» [GAME] Say something about the person above you ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Haine - Jul 19, 2014 |
3810 |
by Zymf
»»
Jun 19, 2023 2:43 PM |
|
» [GAME] Truth or dare (ToD) 2.0 [Round 5] ( 1 2 )Lambtron - Mar 12, 2019 |
92 |
by Zymf
»»
Jun 18, 2023 12:09 PM |