What am i missing?

That is not only false, it is a poor defense of the anime, shameful and ridiculous

@ejleon im not saying it to defend the anime im just saying that almost every story advances their plot through misunderstanding thats how from 3 chapter story you get 5 volumes of the story its funnier that way and leads to a lot of interesting developments, if your disappointed with the anime then you just set your expectations too high and thats your fault so kindly think next time when you watch an anime and think about setting your expectations right, thank you and good bye

@ejleon my dude, you're talking as if you gave us any real evidence, at least give us your so called research.

Btw, this show is marketed as misunderstanding comedy, so unfortunately for you, they will always use that misunderstanding aspect. And I love it.

I wasn’t talking to you, so therefore I have reason to address your insane illogical demands.

Your opinion of the anime is irrelevant, I’m speaking far beyond mere personal opinion

@ejleon and? Where was this "far beyond mere personal opinion" then? If you're afraid of wasting too much time then why are you even here discussing this? This is literally "trust me fr fr".

@EdgyLord666 • Are you really so dense that you can’t distinguish between discussing the show and discussing comedy as its own subject? You proved this is a waste of my time.

If you don’t trust me, then look it up yourself, if you are not too lazy

@ejleon Are you so dense that you can't understand how I wanted to connect those things and understand why this show is funny? If it's a waste of time then just don't reply and let your opinion be a mere opinion like all of us dude.

I did, and it's still as vague as ever, that's why I'm asking.

@EdgyLord666

A person honestly asking about the topic would not have responded like you did, that’s how I know that you are lying when you claim to want to understand.

You said I was not presenting evidence for my claim and was just speaking from opinion, but that’s not true.

First, I said this show’s over used “misunderstandings” were not funny.

Second, I was honestly stating that I had done research into the science of comedy.

Comedy

Here is an article on the topic

Of course it is an opinion, that was never in question. I was just making it clear what my opinion was.

I was not required to present anything to you. I only sent something because you were falsely accusing me.

I gave this example on purpose because I was trying to clue you in that even young people know something as simple as comedy being objective more than subjective.

And no, Cid is not a well written character. He has no depth and is on repeat.

@Wat3rCrushertime that is poor writing and you know it

The best myths, books, plays, comics, shows, movies, anime were not written based on misunderstanding

I never claimed you said “best”, so now you are lying.

I was making a point, that flew right over your head.

And it is false that “misunderstandings” are used as you are claiming.

It’s not about the whole story, it is about the “misunderstanding” being used like beating a dead horse, it just isn’t funny after 200 times.

That’s the second time you told me to “go home”, but I am free to try all I want to explain to an unintelligent airhead like you that comedy has its limits.

Falsely accusing me by claiming I was suppose to present evidence when that was never the case. Basically you made up this lie that I was supposed to present evidence, when no one ever asked for evidence and I never said I was going to present evidence.

I looked up the definitions of these words…

1. Subjective: Based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions.

2. Objective: (of a person or their judgement) not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts

Here is the difference between what I’m saying and you’re saying.

We both thought the “misunderstandings” were funny at the start of the anime, but as the episodes continued, I was not laughing any longer at the “misunderstandings” because I kept predicting when this would happen and it lost its appeal, but you continued laughing at them throughout the series.

A “misunderstanding” joke can be funny, but repeating the same joke 200 times with the same character, the joke loses its appeal, and no longer remains funny.

This conclusion is not subjective, it is objective. Any joke repeated over and over becomes less and less funny because the audience knows it’s going to happen.

This is why Cid is not complexly written and does not have depth, he does the same exact thing every episode, his character is totally predictable.

Every other character in the anime is dynamic, but Cid is exactly the same in every episode and never changes. Rose is far more complex and deeper than Cid is.

How can you not understand this?

Then you missed the context of why I said that to the person named Todday.

Following the post order and context of the conversation (at least on my phone MAL app).

“You like to say a lot without saying anything meaningful at all don't you”

I was responding to this comment by saying that he has no evidence to support this claim, which is an ‘ad hominem’ personal attack on me, not a comment on the topic of discussion.

I was not saying that they have not presented evidence to support their own personal opinion that comedy is subjective.

They had not asked for evidence to support my own personal opinion that comedy is objective, nor did I say that was going to present evidence for this.

So when you said that I didn’t present evidence for my opinion, I was totally confused and also thinking that you were just making this up.

I think this became a misunderstanding and I apologize for how I acted and responded to you.

———

I can understand more now what you mean about the show, thanks for continue to patiently explain.

I’m just totally predicting every “misunderstanding” now (I didn’t read the written material either) and it is getting kind of annoying 😅🤣

Falsely accusing me by claiming I was suppose to present evidence when that was never the case. Basically you made up this lie that I was supposed to present evidence, when no one ever asked for evidence and I never said I was going to present evidence.

I looked up the definitions of these words…

1. Subjective: Based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions.

2. Objective: (of a person or their judgement) not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts

Here is the difference between what I’m saying and you’re saying.

We both thought the “misunderstandings” were funny at the start of the anime, but as the episodes continued, I was not laughing any longer at the “misunderstandings” because I kept predicting when this would happen and it lost its appeal, but you continued laughing at them throughout the series.

A “misunderstanding” joke can be funny, but repeating the same joke 200 times with the same character, the joke loses its appeal, and no longer remains funny.

This conclusion is not subjective, it is objective. Any joke repeated over and over becomes less and less funny because the audience knows it’s going to happen.

This is why Cid is not complexly written and does not have depth, he does the same exact thing every episode, his character is totally predictable.

Every other character in the anime is dynamic, but Cid is exactly the same in every episode and never changes. Rose is far more complex and deeper than Cid is.

How can you not understand this?