New
Dec 5, 2014 10:55 AM
#401
Earwen said: That's not really much to go on. He yells at people...that's it? Does he yell exclusively at women or something? It's not just that he yells at them, but he acts entitled to Manaka and puts his hands on her throughout the series. That kind of behavior is actually justified by their friends using the "he's just that way because he loves you!" excuse and it made me really uncomfortable to watch. In my eyes, that's abusive. EDIT: I've posted screencaps from the first episode that summarizes my opinion on this series: http://i62.tinypic.com/312k65x.jpg http://i62.tinypic.com/2cd7212.jpg http://i59.tinypic.com/a0dtvl.jpg |
LillianAmourDec 5, 2014 11:24 AM
Dec 5, 2014 1:45 PM
#402
| That does sound bad. Anyone else want to weight in? I'd like a second opinion before adding it. |
Dec 7, 2014 2:16 AM
#403
| I pretty much agree. I dropped it mostly because that character got away with way too much shit. It gives me a vague feeling of nausea, when somebody is being a total prick and everyone goes along with it. As I said, I didn't watch all of it, so maybe the story has some smart moral later on. I doubt it, though. |
Jan 9, 2015 12:34 AM
#405
| For anyone who reads or watches Akatsuki no Yona, is anyone else bothered by Hak constantly making advances on Yona? And the moments where he treats her as incompetent? I initially liked the story but now it really annoys me. I ended up dropping the manga after chapters 64 and 65. I don't like this couple so I don't want to keep reading, even though I like the other characters. For me, the romance is really ruining everything. I guess I should expect things like this in shoujo... |
Jan 11, 2015 2:33 AM
#406
| Not entirely sure if anyone has named it before but I wanted to talk about Hapi Mari (manga). The male main character is the tortured type, the kind to abused the girl because of personal traumas and stuff. The main female character is just worthless, the kind of girl that even knowing she's being abused once and once again keeps with the man and supports him with no personal ambitions further than that. Their relation ship is really awful on both sides, including physical violence, verbal violence and other kinds of mistreat. But the worse part of it all is that is portrayed as a relationship every girl would desire, an perfect relationship because in spite of all the abuse and misconduct they still love each other. I read it all and it's been the time I've been pissed off the most by any manga ever. |
| If it has solution, don't bother; and if it hasn't, why bothering? Do you like manga? http://gunjoteam.com |
Jan 11, 2015 9:29 AM
#407
Tsukiaki said: Not entirely sure if anyone has named it before but I wanted to talk about Hapi Mari (manga). (. . .) Sure. I'll add it. Any objections? |
Jan 14, 2015 8:44 AM
#408
Daisy_petals said: For anyone who reads or watches Akatsuki no Yona, is anyone else bothered by Hak constantly making advances on Yona? And the moments where he treats her as incompetent? I initially liked the story but now it really annoys me. I ended up dropping the manga after chapters 64 and 65. I don't like this couple so I don't want to keep reading, even though I like the other characters. For me, the romance is really ruining everything. I guess I should expect things like this in shoujo... I don't see a problem with Hak really, we have to keep i n mind he's a teenager still if I recall as is Yona herself. I'm actually pretty set on adding it to our 'good' list because it's a GREAT series with a lot of feminist and empowering elements. Hak makes advances on the princess, and he TEASES her. And then she shuts him down every time and proves he's wrong. So I honestly don't see how it's problematic. |
Jan 15, 2015 11:26 AM
#409
| Yes I saw it as having empowering moments too, but Hak is always grabbing her and making sexual innuendos. Plus he still has moments where he tries to hold her back and stop her from protecting herself or getting stronger. I don't think the show is sexist, but I think Hak is. And it's obvious that they are endgame. I really disliked how he treated Yona in the latest manga chapters. |
Jan 19, 2015 9:50 PM
#410
| So, has anyone seen an anime called "I My Me! Strawberry Eggs"? I ask because I haven't seen this show, but reading the synoposis makes me think it could be either on this list or the feminist friendly list. On one hand, it does have a main character that cross-dresses and could be read as trans* and apparently stands up against homophobia. On the other hand, the principal character sounds like a straw feminist because she rants on about how she hates men and appears to be the 'bad guy' of the story. Blegh, I hate it when that happens. And from a review I read, there seems to be some bad fanservice. Any other opinions? |
| Hello, may I have a moment to tell you about our lord and savoir, Usagi Tsukino? OvO |
Jan 24, 2015 6:06 PM
#411
| @Daisy_petals: Sounds like the Yona manga is a lot different than the anime, or is it just because I'm only in the beginning? |
Jan 25, 2015 3:37 PM
#412
Kaceseev said: So, has anyone seen an anime called "I My Me! Strawberry Eggs"? I ask because I haven't seen this show, but reading the synoposis makes me think it could be either on this list or the feminist friendly list. On one hand, it does have a main character that cross-dresses and could be read as trans* and apparently stands up against homophobia. On the other hand, the principal character sounds like a straw feminist because she rants on about how she hates men and appears to be the 'bad guy' of the story. Blegh, I hate it when that happens. And from a review I read, there seems to be some bad fanservice. Any other opinions? It's been more than 5 years since I watched it.From what I remember it doesn't belong to either list. And the main character definitely isn't trans. |
Jan 25, 2015 7:21 PM
#413
| any mention of cross ange yet? |
dustinator1991 said: You like hentai for your favorite anime so you have no room to talk. |
Jan 30, 2015 10:23 PM
#415
Earwen said: It's been more than 5 years since I watched it.From what I remember it doesn't belong to either list. And the main character definitely isn't trans. Ah! Sorry! I assumed he might be because I read something about him on TvTropes. (There's also the fact that I want reprensentation pretty badly) Well, jokes on me for trusting TvTropes, huh? |
| Hello, may I have a moment to tell you about our lord and savoir, Usagi Tsukino? OvO |
Feb 1, 2015 2:45 PM
#416
Kaceseev said: Earwen said: It's been more than 5 years since I watched it.From what I remember it doesn't belong to either list. And the main character definitely isn't trans. Ah! Sorry! I assumed he might be because I read something about him on TvTropes. (There's also the fact that I want reprensentation pretty badly) Well, jokes on me for trusting TvTropes, huh? Ah it's fine, and yes I remember watching it as well long ago. I remember it was kinda cute but definitely not for the list. The main character just dressed as a woman to teach at an all-girls' school. |
Feb 1, 2015 5:11 PM
#417
| A few words about the Steins;Gate. There may be spoilers and bit of buttheart, but it's OK. First of all - he did not think that the girls is garbage and certainly he offends no one. From the first moment we are given to understand that Okabe pretends by, calling himself a mad scientist. And each of them understands it, and do not take his babble seriously. And he, too, is well aware of it. Okabe founded the lab in the first place just because he has a hero complex. He wanted to save his friend and create warm place to go. Mayuri - is his childhood friend, she has family problems, which worsened when died the only person who's been the only true family for her. She turned in on itself. Then Okabe pulled a fake smile and put on the image of a villain from a children's program. (Kurisu travel back in time and pushed him). It was an improvisation, and it worked. He could not just say, "You're not alone, I need you," so he blurted out some nonsense about a hostage. Hostage - is a metaphor for "Stay with me." What's so disgusting, crippy or sexist about it? I don't know, maybe I missed a new wave of feminism. Daru - is fat guy-otaku. He was a classmate of Okabe. Most likely he was abused because of his lifestyle and appearance. In Japanese schools is not a rare occurrence. Okabe also decided to help this guy, by inviting him to become a member of the laboratory. I don't understand why you dislike Mayuri. She has a life and purpose, but you apparently do not see them. Mayuri perfectly understands why there is a "laboratory" and what it actually is. Three of them simply haw no where to go except this place. This is the only place that they can call home. That's why they spend there all their free time doing nothing. This is shelter. Feyris and Ruka was originally friends Mayuri. How do you think, they appeared in the lab? Correctly. The reason is the same as the Okabe, Daru and Mayuri have. They have a problem and they have no where else to go. About troubles of Ruka and Feyris only Mayuri knows, and she apparently cann't tell anyone. Ruka have an older sister who went to study. Parents wanted her to become, a miko (shrine maiden), but she decided that everything will be different. Ruka's father started projected onto kid the image of his sister. It is because of him the boy began to wear feminine clothes and miko outfit. Father wanted so. Mayuri knew about it. She knew that Ruka need safe a place to call home, and she began to bring her (him?) to the lab. It's a safe haven. Unlike the others, Feyris have place that she could call home. But this is just a huge, empty, luxury apartments in which she has to live alone. She does not like when she was treated differently from other people, so she it works in the ordinary, the average cafe. Mayuri, apparently, knew about her problems. She knew that the cat also need a place to call home, so brought her to the "laboratory" as well. Mayuri - not an empty shell, she has character, motives, point of view and the role. But she may not always expressed it, because she can't tell anyone about other people's secrets. Okabe realizes that these people also have their problems about which no one will tell him. He learns about the problems of Ruka and Feyris only in the course of the story. Almost the same thing happens with Suzuha and Moeka. Okabe sees state of Moeka and invites her to bekome lab member. Okabe thinks that Suzuha came to Tokyo from a some sort of remote village. She had not seen fireworks, she had problems with the bike and so on. It seems that in the company of people she will be better. His behavior - the result of trial and error. He acts like an idiot, but he knew how it looks from the outside. And yet - an eccentric mad scientist - this is what distracts members of the laboratory from unwanted thoughts, personal issues and routine. And each member of the "laboratory" understands this and does not get angry at Okabe. Mayuri helps Okabe just as he helps her. That is why later, when the lab becomes fun and noisy, when Okabe is not anymore obliged to pretend to be an idiot, she asked if he still needed a hostage, because no one is lonely anymore. I understand that you are tired of the soft character, but that does not automaticly mean that every female character, who gets in you way, must be iron and monumental. Also, nobody forbade Kurisu explore a time machine. The decision to terminate the experiment was collective and was accepted only because they tried to bite off too much. Dig deeper was simply dangerous, and further study was unaffordable, Okabe spends all the money to pay rent. Therefore, it was necessary to disclose information, that could get the ball rolling. Someone said that everything that happens - it is the result of malicious acts of Okabe. For Real? The only thing he wanted to do - is to help his friends to get rid of their problems and simultaneously conduct experiments. Or revers. Nobody knew that in the end everything will lead to the fact that death of Mayuri and kidnaping of lab members will be almost inevitable. He's the only one who remembers the previous world lines. Think about it a bit. It is clear that he senses blame for what happened, and he must beg others to help him, but the fact is - no one would believed to him anyway. Everyone have already got used to the fact that he was pretending to look like mad scientist, so nothing of what he actualy says is not perceived by the other seriously. Moreover, he simply didn't have time for this, and after the abolition of D-mails, all efforts will go down the drain, lab members still forget. I also do not understand why someone angers about how Okabe canceled Moeka D-mail. She dozens of times kill Mayuri and initially worked on organization of the enemy. He should not feel any regret for it. Date with a Ruka someone also considers as problematic. Like, instead of it Okabe spent the on an imaginary, typical workout with sword. The fact is that Ruka has alredy used to this. She wanted to see in front of herself the good old Okabe, who helped her to forget about old problems and with whom she fell in love. And in the end he understood it. Also there is nothing bad about "But he's a guy," in context. Okabe said it to himself, and only because Ruka is very similar to the girl. Thus Ruka never said he wanted to become female. Every time someone did compliments to Ruka - he acted confused and uncomfortable. I say it again - Okabe is a nice guy, but with some personal issues. He literally can not explain to anyone the state of situation in detail, because everyone thinks he caught up in fantasies again. So he immediately goes to the most sane person - to Kurisu. And of course, Ruka does not want to become a guy. Feyris does not want to lose a father. But it was necessary, to save Mayuri. And even if the dialogue could be better - the context perfectly helps to understand the motives of the characters. I just can't comment on it any further, I promise. Why feminism stopped fighting against sexism, but instead began to seek it everywhere specifically? This is what I call the "The search of Jesus on toast." Everyone understands that it just burned spot, but for some people it's Jesus. At such moments, I begin to fear of feminism and less respect it. I try to think about how it could lead to censorship in near future and I just have goosebumps. I can't say that Steins;Gate is perfect, but for God's sake, do not put it in one category with SAO. I just cant sleep, until there is a posebilety of it. And yeah, i am feel sorry for the my clumsy text. In Uganda, English is spoken much better than in my country. |
VelinquenTFeb 1, 2015 5:20 PM
Feb 1, 2015 5:30 PM
#418
| I don't necessarily disagree with what you have written but did you literally just come to this club to complain about us discussing Steins Gate? Are you just angry that your favorite anime is being called sexist? Really? |
Feb 1, 2015 5:43 PM
#419
Earwen said: I don't necessarily disagree with what you have written but did you literally just come to this club to complain about us discussing Steins Gate? Are you just angry that your favorite anime is being called sexist? Really? Nope. I joined the club because there might be interesting people. The narrower the club - the more interesting. It just happens that there is talk about Steins; Gate, so... |
Feb 1, 2015 5:50 PM
#420
| Okay that's fine then. The thing is this is your first post here and it's solely about defending Steins Gate. You have to understand we can't just entertain every random guy (or girl as it might be) who comes in here and demands to know why some anime is on the list. Honestly I was going to let it go if it weren't for your comments on feminism. And I still don't really understand why someone who thinks feminism will result in censorship would want to be here. Anyway I should reply to the steins gate post sometime. I promised the original poster I would. And you do raise some good points. |
Feb 1, 2015 5:59 PM
#421
Earwen said: Okay that's fine then. The thing is this is your first post here and it's solely about defending Steins Gate. You have to understand we can't just entertain every random guy (or girl as it might be) who comes in here and demands to know why some anime is on the list. Honestly I was going to let it go if it weren't for your comments on feminism. And I still don't really understand why someone who thinks feminism will result in censorship would want to be here. Anyway I should reply to the steins gate post sometime. I promised the original poster I would. And you do raise some good points. Sorry. I usualy just lurk around, read discussion. I am not against feminism, I'm just a skeptic by nature. This applies to anything. By the way, It's been long time since i watching the show for the last time, same with VN. So, in my mind it could all blend into one story. I can't say exactly what was in the anime, and what from VN. |
VelinquenTFeb 1, 2015 6:07 PM
Feb 1, 2015 6:39 PM
#422
| Original poster here. Thank you for your reply, VelinquenT. While there's definitely some interesting points there that could merit more exploration, I'm hesitant to reply in full to it for a couple of big reasons: 1) As you mention, you've mixed up the anime and VN to some extent. For example, you mention Ruka's sister, who is only mentioned in the VN, not the anime: http://steins-gate.wikia.com/wiki/Ruka_Urushibara As another example, and feel free to correct me if I'm misinterpreting your meaning, there also appears to be a contradiction in how you claim that "I don't understand why you dislike Mayuri. She has a life and purpose, but you apparently do not see them." and "Mayuri - not an empty shell, she has character, motives, point of view and the role.", but in your very own tags for the anime here on MAL, you concede "Mayuri lacks individuality. She causes desire to protect her, no more." These types of discrepancies are a big reason why I wrote a decent amount in my reply to Earwen about the general differences between VNs and anime adaptation in general, and how those differences could have a huge effect on our discussions here. 2) Speaking of that reply to Earwen, it appears that your reply was directly to my original post (on page 13) and not to my reply to Earwen (on page 17). I was certainly angry while composing the original post, and I feel that I refined a lot of my original arguments in the reply. Moreover, in that reply, I directly linked several scenes on Youtube to back up my points. As a result, for now I'd just like to make you aware of that page 17 reply, if you weren't already, and if you'd still like me to reply to your original post after that, I'll do what I can. However, as it stands, there's only so much I'd be able to do due to the pervasive VN issue in your reply. |
Feb 1, 2015 7:21 PM
#423
engalleons said: Original poster here. Thank you for your reply, VelinquenT. While there's definitely some interesting points there that could merit more exploration, I'm hesitant to reply in full to it for a couple of big reasons: 1) As you mention, you've mixed up the anime and VN to some extent. For example, you mention Ruka's sister, who is only mentioned in the VN, not the anime: http://steins-gate.wikia.com/wiki/Ruka_Urushibara As another example, and feel free to correct me if I'm misinterpreting your meaning, there also appears to be a contradiction in how you claim that "I don't understand why you dislike Mayuri. She has a life and purpose, but you apparently do not see them." and "Mayuri - not an empty shell, she has character, motives, point of view and the role.", but in your very own tags for the anime here on MAL, you concede "Mayuri lacks individuality. She causes desire to protect her, no more." These types of discrepancies are a big reason why I wrote a decent amount in my reply to Earwen about the general differences between VNs and anime adaptation in general, and how those differences could have a huge effect on our discussions here. 2) Speaking of that reply to Earwen, it appears that your reply was directly to my original post (on page 13) and not to my reply to Earwen (on page 17). I was certainly angry while composing the original post, and I feel that I refined a lot of my original arguments in the reply. Moreover, in that reply, I directly linked several scenes on Youtube to back up my points. As a result, for now I'd just like to make you aware of that page 17 reply, if you weren't already, and if you'd still like me to reply to your original post after that, I'll do what I can. However, as it stands, there's only so much I'd be able to do due to the pervasive VN issue in your reply. Well, yes. Mayuri has where to improved. Point is that her character becomes better when it's analyzed. At first glance, she is just a support tool, because the original author is definitely overdone with the depth. What happened here is that the archetype just prevented disclosure of character. Therefore, the key emotions associated with Mayuri - a desire to protect. Too bad, so sad. But i can't say that is sexsist in a way. Bad writing, perhaps. Unfortunately, a lot of information in the VN passed down through the texting between characters, by phone. In the anime, it was impossible to implement ... I read your reply to Earwen just now. I can respond to it fully, but the problem is that we have different views on the same problem. You see a problem where I don't see it, and vice versa. Perhaps I should read it again. I do not mind if you answer my original post. |
VelinquenTFeb 1, 2015 7:32 PM
Feb 2, 2015 4:07 PM
#424
VelinquenT said: I can respond to it fully, but the problem is that we have different views on the same problem. You see a problem where I don't see it, and vice versa. Fair enough. I'll leave it until the next person that wants to champion your (or similar) arguments then. |
Feb 4, 2015 6:34 AM
#425
| Okay, I have read your discussion again. I'm sorry. I broke into the conversation without permission again. I think that my first message can be viewed as a partial response to the comment on page 17, so here I will only refer to its parts, that I did not mention before. If you think that you should answer me, then try to take into account both of my posts. Sorry, I wanted to answer the day before yesterday but I did not have time at all. engalleons said: For example, you mention that Okabe mentioned sexual reassignment surgery to Ruka in the VN. I don’t remember that line in the anime, and it seems like something I would’ve remembered. Yes, they thrown out from an anime not only references to the surgery, but also a prerequisite for a dialogue about it. It seems that the people who were responsible for adaptation, wanted to smooth corners in some way. engalleons said: My overall point here is that the anime may actually be substantially different from the VN in the ways that we discuss here, and so it’s useful to directly reference the anime when we’re discussing it. Luckily, the entire anime series appears to be on Youtube, so I’ve linked a few specific parts here. The anime is designed to stand alone, and my post was about the anime, so when we have disagreements, let’s try to focus on that. If you want to reference specific things that were revealed in the VN that contradict what I’ve laid out here, go ahead, and I’ll try to remember if those made it into the anime. TV series, based on the VN Steins; Gate - is one of the best examples of high-quality adaptation. Steins; Gaate - is the second part of a visual novels series (SciAdv / Kagaku Adventures). The first was Chaos; Head, which is the original universe for the next games. Adaptation has been so terrible, that at one time, it became memetic. Potential has been lost. The next game in the series was Robotic; Notes, which adaptation was also failed, even despite the fact that she VN was excellent. Not so long ago been out VN, called Chaos; Child - it is the ideological heir to the first part. Some people say that this game is better than its predecessors, so we need to hope that the adaptation will be high-quality. engalleons said: Moeka’s shyness is a reason to continuously insult her. I do not think he insult her. But what we are shown - it is dialogue, which are a little out of context. In the original MIPC "pursues" Okabe, in a sense. She writes to him endlessly dozens senseless messages, consisting of a pair of words. Therefore, over time, he loses his temper. When he wants to talk - she refuses. All the rest - it's part of his image, part of the "Dark Phoenix", a part of the eccentric mad scientist. And, despite this, Okabe feels mood of the people who surround him, so he never crosses the line. engalleons said: Kurisu is a constant target for perverted comments and other insults, and Okabe doesn’t even see fit to call her by her actual name. The only person who could be called a perverted - it's Daru, but it's part of his character. And yet - the surrounding people is not particularly encourage this behavior. Okabe permanently plug it, when it comes to bananas and so on. Okabe calls by name to no one, it is contrary to his image. He appeals to males and females in the same way, but it may not seem so, just because Daru, as the sacond male member of the lab, is not actively involved in conversations and collective events. Moreover, Kurisu teasing Okabe just as he teasing her. But from her side, it begins to appear later in the story and in less quantities, because she is not fancies herself as mad scientist. And she, generally, refers to Daru openly negative. I can't say that she had no good reason for this, but... But I agree that thet perfectely can go on without perverted jokes. engalleons said: Several of the women are targets of Daru’s perverted comments, and it isn’t even passive: he explicitly encourages them to play into his perversions. And everyone is trying to shut him up. In other words - this behavior is due to the personality, not for fanservice, but is not encouraged at all. engalleons said: In each case, Okabe and Daru are apparently trying to dehumanize and objectify the women. Sorry, I can't recall any precedent. I don't remember, if Okabe or Daru discussed ass and breasts of the female members of the laboratory. Perhaps you got caught not so high-quality subtitles. In any case, give an example, if it is not difficult. engalleons said: None of them, except Kurisu, seem to care at all, and even when she cares she just complains briefly before continuing on like nothing happened. They all just sort of got sucked into Okabe’s orbit and that was that. I think the answer to this part of the comment was in my original message engalleons said: As far as Kurisu’s nickname is concerned, you are correct that he gives nicknames to everyone. Moreover, two of the three original members of the lab referred to Okabe "Okarin". And he rage about it, but yet does the same for other people. It's part of his character. But as I've said before - he feels the mood around and if someone was really against it, then he would not be imposed. engalleons said: The reason I brought her up specifically (and I wasn’t quite clear on this originally) is because she consistently tells Okabe to call her by her actual name and he ignores her, to the point where him calling her by her actual name (much later) is recognized as a significant event by both of them. This is author's trick. The writer would like to show that the mask of eccentric mad scientist has disappeared with no rtace. And it worked just because it was a mask from the wery beginning. Okabe did not change by himself, hi initially didn't want to offend anyone. His usual behavior - is the result of his attempts to sustain life in the laboratory. Without it, everything falls apart. Do you see the difference between the characters Daru and Mayuri? They are totally different people, who happened to meet and become friends only because of Okabe and his deviant behavior. More about that I wrote in the original post. engalleons said: A name is an important part of an identity, as I’m sure we can all appreciate, but Okabe just doesn’t care. If that's what you mean by objectification, then it is not. In the case of a nickname is all wrong. Okabe initially gave people nicknames that would emphasize individuality. For example, "Shining finger.". Sharp, but straight to the point. engalleons said: And Kurisu is a scientist, yes, and her research interest is time travel. This ties more directly into the plot than anything else in the entire anime. You’d imagine that once Kurisu has access to time machines, she’d want to use them carefully for research purposes. She is afraid of a time machine, so it's easy to put off the experiments to near future. The rest is in my first post. engalleons said: But as far as the phone microwave is concerned, Kurisu explicitly states that she has no interest in using it herself (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtSNzCEQplc#t=5m8s) . This approach is understandable, even in her situation, but even so, you’d think that, as a scientist, she’d attempt to exert very careful control over how the phone microwave is used in order to create the best experiments. But Okabe is always the one making the final call, and moreover, he soon becomes extremely careless with that final call, and so what he’s doing with it isn’t useful to Kurisu at all. As far as I can remember, this does not phase her. Okabe has its own reasons for such behavior. First - he is the only one who remembers the previous world lines, so any interaction with the time machine can only occur through him. And in the case of D-mail experiments, they generally occur from the Okabe point of view. From the point of view of other members of the laboratory experiments are not carried out at all. His testimony are easily blamed on the typical behavior. The second reason - is his hero complex. He has traveled back in time before and he is ready to do it again, only to not expose anyone in danger. Kurisu already said that in theory the time leap machine can lead to irreversible damage of brain. And yet - Okabe uses it dozens of times. engalleons said: I’ll concede the point regarding Faris’s goals. As I said before, I’m basically more or less OK with how her parts shook out. If I recall correctly, she didn’t create Akihabara as much as she led to its creation by starting a maid café there, but that’s not any strike against her either. The point is not in the cafe itself. After the death of her father, she manages the business to some extent. She allowed to make the capital of animation culture out of Akiba. About the cafe, I wrote in the original post. engalleons said: This paragraph was here for a couple reasons: a) to provide a(n admittedly awkward) transition between discussing the characters and discussing the plot, and b) to emphasize that the entire reason that the situation got so out of hand was because Okabe let that happen. This is important to mention because as I said a bit after this: Despite these reasons, Okabe simply doesn’t feel the need to even ask them, let alone beg them, for help. Instead, he just tells them what to do, or worse, in Moeka’s case, and they do it. Okabe was the one who created a prototype of time machine and accidentally use it. This, of course, is the cause of all the subsequent events, but he is not guilty. It was an accident. The rest of the D-mail he sent for the sake of the experiment, and to help friends. But whatever he did, the concept of guilt exists only in his mind. From the point of view of other members of the lab - he never tried to help anyone, and certainly not jumping back in time, to save Mayuri. Their lives are changed only from witness position. engalleons said: Part II: On the Relationship between Gender and Plot Sorry, but the whole second part looks like a conspiracy theory. The screenplay was written by ordinary people, not evil patriarchal leaders. From this point, any author's solution can be interpreted as sexism. Few women - bad. Many women - bad. Women criminals - stereotypes imposed by patriarchy. Lovely, kind, sympathetic women - non realistic image imposed by patriarchy. This is a desperate and in some way impossible situation. In our case, the characters just are what they are, and sex change leads to changes in the character or plot. But yes, initially it was a visual novel, which audience of - it is primarily men between 15 and 25, so there's a lot of girls. By the way, that's why in harems, at times, some characters, with non-romantic relationships, poorly disclosed. Disclosure occurs in the novel, when the reader selects a particular girl. In the anime, it can't be fully realized. And that's why the original is not always possible to consider as harem. Harem is often created by people, who responsible for adaptation. This, of course, applies only to VN. I don't think that the author of the original work, or director of adaptation, hate women. All the matter is in difference of worldview. For example, I'm losing my head at the sight of gentle and shy girls. And that is why you can consider me a sexist or a freak. But from my perspective, it looks harmless. Therefore, if I ever decide to take up writing a book or a script, then my preference will affect the image of the characters in some way or another. This is definitely not out of malice, but someone may well decide that the headshot is the best medicine for me. And they can also be right. engalleons said: Part III: On “The Line for the List” I think that the answer to this part might be in my original message... |
Feb 5, 2015 5:28 PM
#426
| The reason I was willing to dig into the details of the show with Earwen on page 17 is that, as far as I know, we’re essentially on the same page as far what sexism is and how it can appear in media. On the other hand, you’ve made quite clear that you are not on that same page. As a result, as you even alluded to yourself, it’s not yet worth digging into details with you. Instead, I’m going to zoom out beyond Steins;Gate and talk about my viewpoints much more generally. If we’re going to get anywhere at all, we’ll need to start here. I’m not going to elaborate on them too much yet, because, to be frank, my assumption is that we’ll find that our viewpoints are too far apart for future discussion to be terribly fruitful. But under certain circumstances, I’ll be willing to go into more detail. Let’s start with four basic points: 1) A creator’s intent is entirely irrelevant when considering whether a work of media is sexist. If a work of media has sexist aspects, you cannot simply argue them away by saying that the creator did not intend for those aspects to be sexist for a couple of major reasons: a) The intent of the creator is not an actual component of the media itself. Obviously, the creator intends to express certain ideas and emotions by creating, and that intent (hopefully) has a large impact on what the work is. But the work ultimately stands by itself, in the context of itself. b) Sexism, as a mindset and as a driver of actions, is often unintentional. Human mindsets and human actions are caused by an innumerable number of factors, many of which are mostly or entirely unknown when the mindset or action is considered. But those innumerable causes do not in any way dictate the innumerable effects of those mindsets and actions. As a result, it is entirely possible for a work of media to be sexist without its creator’s ever intending for that to be the case. 2) When a work of media is a stand-alone adaptation, the original work’s sexism or lack thereof is entirely irrelevant when considering whether the adaptation is sexist. Adaptations of media are not simply one-to-one translations to other mediums. In even the best adaptations, many, many characteristics of the original are lost or distorted. This is inevitable due to differences between mediums. However, when the adaptation is designed for consumption by itself, without reference to the original work, those lost and distorted aspects of the original work are not aspects of the adaption. They cannot affect the nature of the adaptation, because they are not a part of the adaptation. Therefore, it is entirely possible for an adaptation to be sexist without the original work being sexist. 3) A work of media’s internal justifications are entirely irrelevant when considering whether the work is sexist. This is almost certainly my most controversial assertion. It’s easy to forget this sometimes as a viewer, but a creator begins with nothing beyond the inherent constraints of a medium. As a result, the creator has incredible latitude in developing the characteristics of the work. This is particularly true in anime, which is subject to far fewer economic and logistical constraints than live-action films and television series. But as a result of this latitude, a character’s sexist behavior or mindset cannot simply be explained away by saying that the plot demanded it, that interactions with other characters required it, or that the character’s personality meant that a change wouldn’t make any sense. Plot, character interactions, and character personality are all internal to the work of media, and as a result they can all be easily manipulated by the creator. This is an incredibly easy trap to fall into sometimes – for example, even with my attitude towards Steins;Gate, I did it in my response to Earwen. But the creator could have changed any of the aspects of the work that led to the “forced” behavior or mindset. Moreover, the character’s behavior or mindset could even be altered in isolation by the creator to not comply with the “force” of the surrounding components. As a result, they really aren’t forced at all. If done poorly, these sorts of changes could certainly make the work of media less appealing to the viewer. That fact is irrelevant to the question of whether the work is sexist. You may be thinking that my emphasis on the creator here contradicts my viewpoint in the first point. But the first point was about the creator’s intent. This third point is about the creator’s power over the work of media. They are related but certainly distinct concepts. 4) A work of media's being sexist does not mean that the viewer should not enjoy the work emotionally or critically, or even that the viewer should enjoy the work less. The sexism or lack thereof of a work of media is merely one of innumerable characteristic of the work. The work can be enjoyed in spite of this characteristic, or enjoyed without consideration of this characteristic. This enjoyment does not inherently reflect poorly on the viewer as a person. |
Feb 6, 2015 4:00 PM
#427
| Can I first say Im a new member in this group and your all doing a great job. Ok before I say this anime should be added I actually adore it and its one of my favorite romances/comedy series but I know others in this group might not. Its Hayate the Combat Bulter , two reason as to why it should be added. 1.Nagi is some lolicon depends on how you look at the art (she is 13) and two Nagi (main girl ) is 13 and Hayate (main guy) is 16 and it supports there love (though I heard the manga is taking it sweet time) some are going to say it not good and other says its fine. I dont see a problem since its not pedophilia and is it a 3 year difference but I can understand if one dosnet and I can't speak for the club so thoughs? |
Feb 7, 2015 7:16 AM
#428
| Recommendation: "He is My Master" should really be on the list, since it's so egregiously sexist, much more than the typical harem. Main triggers are: - victimized or helpless female characters: the guy constantly victimizes the main girl, uses his authority to manipulate her, and she seems to end up somewhat falling for him despite this. The only saving grace is that he is depicted as being considered pretty evil by everyone. - hero verbally denigrates women: lots of put downs for the main girl - loli or shota: shots of the younger girl nude etc. - # sexual violence, somewhat, in that the main guy is always trying to spy on the girls nude, forcing them to wear skimpy outfits, etc. And they have a pet aligator who's a rapist, often ripping off the girls clothing. The aligators antics are presented as being especially "hilarious". |
cipheronFeb 7, 2015 7:19 AM
Feb 7, 2015 10:19 AM
#429
| I'll add that one. I haven't seen it, but your description pretty much aligns with the reasons that led a person I know to drop it. What do others think about Hayate, though? |
Feb 7, 2015 1:32 PM
#430
| I relised I forgot to mention two more points towards Hayate. I relised this when I going through part of my season 1 collection. 1. Most of the girls are weak. Nagi cant defend herself nor can this purple hair girl. Grant it there around the age of 13 and most cant defend themselves that great. Plus Hayate said some disturbing crap In the first episode but he didnt relise It or mean It and Nagi takes it like its fine. Luckly this is dropped later . 2. Nagi gets kind of fanservice in the beach episodes though they censored it. Also most of the girls in the harem are 13 and 14 and they get some what fanserviced but its censored. |
Feb 8, 2015 4:35 AM
#431
| Romance between 13 year old and 16 year old doesn't bother me, and I googled them and they seem to look like they are similar in age. But fanservice of 13 year old girls bothers me. Haven't seen Hayate though. |
Feb 8, 2015 7:51 AM
#432
| Hayate is a debatable loli anime because its hard to tell if Nagi is a loli especially if your going off of the anime art but off of the manga its more easier . But all the other school girls and maids in the harem are 14-17 or 18 and look non lolish so I never got that at all . But the fanservice is probamic but it mainly shows up in the beach episodes and a few parts but Maria (she is 17 ) was mainly part of that but Im glad they at least censor it though it still is problematic with that plus most of the girls are weak and Hayate mainly has to help with his Sebastian like powers. But Hayate needs saving to from time to time because he is drowning in debt and 'friendly people' want him so at least Nagi gets to help with her tiger here and there.But I did say in episode one Hayate said some creppy crap like he would kidnap Nagi but he also helps her and loaned his jacket to her and didnt mean it and applogized relising that but not his comments on her and how she looks. |
sleepydreamerFeb 8, 2015 7:56 AM
Feb 11, 2015 7:23 PM
#433
| I dont know this how the club is on double post but I think this sicking anime should be added . I dont know if anyone here has heard of it but its called Loveless and my god its disgusting and I haven't even watched it. I have reasons thanks to a rant so lets list them shall we? 1.Rika or Risa or whatever his name is a shota. I dont mind loli or shota too much as long as they don't get sexuallied too much (and better not at all )or aren't there for the sake of it. Oh boy both applie to him on the spot. 2. A twenty year old in to a 12 year old. Do I need to state why? If this was a 17 or 18 year old with a 20 I could let slide but that is stupid. Now I do have a fetish with the teacher student thing admittedly(if thete 16 or up) but I still know its A.Wrong and B.fucked up especially if not done right but a 12 and 20 year old just no. 3. They apparently try to make it cute and use bondage. I am wordless. And its a yaoi ,Im suppose to think its cute. Hahaha , no. Defense Club, Hetalia, and Free are cute in yaoi undertones. Gauken High is cute (and sadly underrated), Romanitica is cute, hell fricken Fish Water(which was poor) or whatever name it was is more cuter then a pedphiac story. |
Feb 12, 2015 7:01 AM
#434
| From what I know, the relationship between Soubi and Ritsuka is disgusting, because it was supposed to be like that. Personally, I rather like Loveless because it shows just how sick and dysfunctional something like that would be, while many manga pretend it's alright or even romanticize it. However, a huge part of fandom ignore it because OMG YAOI, so many people are mislead about it. You are NOT supposed to believe it's cute. It gets even more blatant with Soubi's backstory, which shows that he has a really messed up views on relationships in general (for starters, he fell in love with Ritsuka because he was ordered to). But yeah, the message is often lost, especially since the anime skipped things (and I guess the cutesy art can be blamed, too). |
Mar 1, 2015 2:02 PM
#435
| I've just realised Btoooom! is not on the list. If anyone hasn't seen it/read it, I think the opening will be enough to convince everyone https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjpxT23yP_8 |
| If it has solution, don't bother; and if it hasn't, why bothering? Do you like manga? http://gunjoteam.com |
Mar 2, 2015 6:21 AM
#436
| That op is pretty much every "edgy" anime trope ever. I have no problem adding Btooom!. This is the character description of the female lead in MAL. Not sure if this is funny or sad. Himiko is a young high school girl. She has bright blue eyes and long, blonde hair, making her look like a foreigner. Her hair is wavy and parted to the right, exposing a part of her forehead. She has small earrings and paints her finger-nails cyan. She has pretty large breasts. Because of her events on the island, she is also covered with small bruises and cuts. She has only been seen wearing her high school uniform. Her uniform consists of a white buttoned shirt with a small tie around her neck. The tie is dark green and Himiko styled it with an embroided white skull. She also wears a camouflage-colored skirt, that reaches the half of her thighs. She has black, long socks and regular shoes. When her underwear was exposed, it is shown that she wears pink bra panties. When she and Sakamoto stayed in the deserted building together, she began wearing a white shirt she found in the rations-case. The shirt has a print of a bat on it and reached over her skirt, revealing only a small portion of it. |
Mar 2, 2015 9:09 AM
#437
| The last chapter had (again) some ridiculous fanservice: this girl was lying on the sand with an injure in her arm/leg, so this guy, who wears a t-shirt that for some reason is whole and hasn't been damaged, decides that the best bandage he can get to treat her is the underside of her shirt, leaving her with just the upperside and an underboob look. I repeat, his t-shirt was whole and undamaged but he had to rip her shirt to the lengh of an underboob. |
| If it has solution, don't bother; and if it hasn't, why bothering? Do you like manga? http://gunjoteam.com |
Mar 2, 2015 10:53 AM
#438
Tsukiaki said: The last chapter had (again) some ridiculous fanservice: this girl was lying on the sand with an injure in her arm/leg, so this guy, who wears a t-shirt that for some reason is whole and hasn't been damaged, decides that the best bandage he can get to treat her is the underside of her shirt, leaving her with just the upperside and an underboob look. I repeat, his t-shirt was whole and undamaged but he had to rip her shirt to the lengh of an underboob. This calls for a character bio update! After [event she got injured] [guy] ripped [girl]s shirt to bandage her. This left [girl] with visible underboob. Someone fill the blanks and add it. |
EarwenMar 2, 2015 10:59 AM
Mar 2, 2015 12:42 PM
#439
| Another good one was when the main characters group was being ambushed by another randoms. The best way to ambush them the randoms could think of was for the men to hide behind trees and for a voluptuous woman to fall on them from a tree. Funny thing is that she fell on a teenager, throwing him to the ground with his head between her thighs. She then threatened the main character's group on suffocating him with her thighs and crotch if they didn't surrender. I think that'd go to the first place of my absurd fanservice ranking if I had one. |
| If it has solution, don't bother; and if it hasn't, why bothering? Do you like manga? http://gunjoteam.com |
Mar 2, 2015 4:06 PM
#440
Tsukiaki said: A The best way to ambush them the randoms could think of was for the men to hide behind trees and for a voluptuous woman to fall on them from a tree. What. How would that even work? ...what? |
Mar 2, 2015 5:07 PM
#441
Mar 12, 2015 10:56 AM
#443
| I haven't watched death parade yet, but i suggest another anime that's airing right now - parasyte. Just the typical: main character, group of girls who are in love with him, but otherwise from that, we know barely anything about them. They have no real depth and their only hobby is to think and talk about MC, worry about him (to the point of absolute ridiculousness), ocasionally getting themselves in trouble just so he can save them. Not to mention this show had the nerve of killing off at least four women so far just to provide for the sake of a good revenge motive for MC or other men. |
Mar 12, 2015 11:29 AM
#444
| I really like Parasyte, but it's very much not a feminist story. One of the girls you mentioned, Tachikawa, does have a nice moment where she disarms one of the parasites (one of literally the only moments where it isn't Shinichi doing so). I also thought that Ryoko was an interesting character, even if it was telling that her role in the show's exploration of the parasites related to her having children. But aside from that, one female character was basically introduced to be killed tragically, Murano mostly seems to be stuck pining for Shinichi, and I can't even figure out why they included Suzuki for any other reason other than making a pseudo-harem for him. One thing that's hurt the show for me in its second half is that it sometimes just feels like yet another "wimpy boy becomes a hero and all the girls lust for him" story; it essentially amounts to him being a superhero, if a reluctant one, and given his prior personality his abilities and prowess can feel a bit too good to be true, even with the in-universe explanation. As much as I enjoy it, I wouldn't be opposed to adding it. Anybody else have thoughts? I'm not as sure about Death Parade anymore. I'd thought it was misogynistic because it felt to me like the women were always the ones being blamed, and people convinced me that it wasn't as simple as that: for one thing, the entire show (at least up until episode 9) is about how screwed up and messy the process of "judging" even is. I also think that Nona is a really good character, and it's clear that she's the driver behind the experiment that is Decim's particular bar. Not saying that it isn't problematic (I don't think I'd ever suggest we add it to our feminist list), but I personally don't think it belongs here. Again, thoughts? |
Mar 12, 2015 11:58 AM
#445
| I sadly haven't seen either (though Im waiting for Parasyte to end so I can start a mini marathon since I heard its additicing though I might also wait on a dub) But I have two anime shows I heard of that I think should be added. One is Okkyami(who I know I spelled wronged) san and her seven companions. I heard its really good but when I found out Okkami was raped and this guy who she says didnt and calked her liar I was turned off of it. Grant it we dont know if she was and they left it on an open note. Honestly I would eatch it since it makes fun of fairy tails but if there having rape than Im sorry just no. Another is Future Diary and honestly how I heard they protray rape pisses me off more than Envy dose. They make it a joke infact from everyone who has seen it and it say its a joke and should not exist. I think there badly offensive from what I heard. |
Mar 12, 2015 3:27 PM
#446
| I pretty much agree word for word with SarcotarascusN about Parasyte. I don't mind adding Parasyte or Mirai Nikki, though I don't know of the other two. |
Mar 12, 2015 4:00 PM
#447
| http://ookamisanandhersevencompanions.wikia.com/wiki/Ookami_Ryouko Scroll down to Shiro and his relatonship with Ryouko. Trust me this is sicking and should not be in a parody at all or in any media that wont take it seriously. |
Mar 12, 2015 11:25 PM
#448
Earwen said: How so? For starters, let me state that I have absolutely no problem with the female characters already involved in the system. I don't take any issue with characters such as Nona and co. as all things considered, they are handled reasonably well. However, the issues regarding the female contestants simply cannot be ignored. They are portrayed in a consistently negative light, often falling back on the Madonna-whore complex through actively condemning the women that engage in sexual relationships yet rewarding those who stay 'pure' and prioritizing how they appear in the eyes of other men. I saw many people call the relationship depicted between the contestants in the third episode sweet, yet most willingly ignored the female contestant’s plastic surgery and how she was also condemned for it through people (male characters) gossiping about her at her workplace. Likewise, although the sixth was a comic relief episode through and through the fact remains that the contestant didn't want to soil herself in front of the male character to the point where she was all too willing to fall to her death. Also, keep the female contestant from the first episode in mind. Although she had quite obviously regretted her affair, and although her friend certainly did exist as proven by the ending sequence, she was still demonized in comparison to the male contestant, her husband. If he was in possession of a more understanding nature, and if he truly cared for his wife, he would have talked over what he overheard in the bathroom to clear up any lingering misunderstandings between them. But he didn’t, and so his jealously and rampant paranoia, not to mention his inability to trust her, quite literally drove them to their death. While it's been painfully, painfully clear that the show is more about exposing the flaws within the judgement system (as it keeps whacking us over the head with a cartoonish mallet every bloody episode), it still does not excuse this behavior. And of course, that's not to mention the most recent two-parter which possibly has the most egregious examples of Death Parade's mistreatment of female characters, where their role amounted to being fridged and little else, serving as targets to be murdered and assaulted. Now, I'm not forgetting that the entire point of the death games is to dredge up the most sinister emotions the characters have buried deep within and show them at their very worst (coming back to the entire system being flawed thing). But in comparison to the female characters, the males almost seem rich and multifaceted with often compelling stories whereas the females are written with an almost indulgent stereotypical bent. |
Mar 13, 2015 12:37 PM
#449
| Didn't they show explicitly in the second episode that Decim's decision to send the female to the void was wrong? Nona was pretty pissed at him. Anyway, I really don't pay attention to this list or the relations list, so I don't really mind either way but I'm personally not in favour of adding Death Parade. I have my issues with the anime, but they do not pertain to misogyny. |
Mar 14, 2015 1:03 AM
#450
| >ignored the female contestant’s plastic surgery and how she was also condemned for it through people > (male characters) gossiping about her at her workplace I don't recall any of the characters making judgemental comments about it. The MC asked "That girl's really cute, who is she?", and the others replied, "dude, it's that girl you used to be good friends with, but she had plastic surgery!". To me, that's a reasonable exchange give the circumstances (someone not recognizing and old friend due to them looking a lot different). So, I wouldn't call it gossip in this case; the question was asked by someone who knew her before, but didn't recognize her, and the other characters told him just enough information so that he knew what was going on. There was no way to explain the situation to him without mentioning the plastic surgery. If someone else had started the conversation: "look at that girl, she had plastic surgery!" I would class that as spreading gossip, because in that case, the information would not have been relevant. |
cipheronMar 14, 2015 1:08 AM
More topics from this board
» Fruits Basket???holysauron - Aug 25, 2019 |
12 |
by removed-user
»»
May 9, 2022 7:27 PM |
|
» • women working on anime: recommendations?aku333 - Apr 5, 2020 |
5 |
by removed-user
»»
May 9, 2022 7:10 PM |
|
» Study materialholysauron - Apr 10, 2018 |
3 |
by Moonspeak
»»
May 6, 2022 9:54 AM |
|
» Feminist television and mini-seriesAngemars - Sep 16, 2016 |
5 |
by Zoldra0
»»
Feb 4, 2022 9:06 AM |
|
» What are your favourite anime/manga and why?daisys - Dec 3, 2021 |
1 |
by Zoldra0
»»
Feb 4, 2022 8:58 AM |
