CorruptedPurity said: followind said: Either you or RE would be my next target to confirm Or you can check on Grr since he's pretty hard to get a read on Hmm both are agreeable suspicious lynch targets. Me because of my aggressiveness and RE cos of her slip up. I don't think you need to explain that. Why Grrr? Reading an inactive is a gamble. It works but if I were a day cop, I rather use my ability to save/secure a lynch for the day. No one is interested in Grrr, reading him gives him a 3/13 chance of finding scum at the cost that if it's the 10/13, we only have an inactive townie and no proper scum targets. Reevaluating day cop, I think checking on highly active players are a stronger play. It can help save grape if he's town or secure a lynch if he's scum. It can also save me if grape flips town or secure a kill on me if I am mafia. You get the idea. Since if he's a mafia.. He can lurk since it's pretty much his play style when I was playing before Let's just say I'm meta reading since he once played sk and lurked till the end |
followind said: It's likely a reaction test but it could also be a way to gain town credit by looking like they are dong a reaction test. What can scum gain from these reactions besides some nice town credit?Oyasumi_Rosie said: I mean... I am pretty paranoid in games myself, so excuse the kettle calling the pot black here. But that really doesn't make any sense. Not really for a basic game like this. If its true, however, it makes sense to come out now. Then town can start using his info right away if he finds anything out. But those are some big ass ifs. Despite what I said, I don't see scum making a big dumb fake claim like that either. So if I use that scale I mentioned before, Penta is probably sitting at a 3.5 right now. OK I accept your logic.. Since this is just a basic game.. Let's draw to a simple one then.. He's using day cop to get reads |
Proud Administrator of the D Gray Man FC and OnePunch-Man FC  |
logic340 said: Yeah..followind said: It's likely a reaction test but it could also be a way to gain town credit by looking like they are dong a reaction test. What can scum gain from these reactions besides some nice town credit?OK I accept your logic.. Since this is just a basic game.. Let's draw to a simple one then.. He's using day cop to get reads This is where paranoia starts.. I'm trying not to think too much nonetheless since I tend to overthink |
amberwillow said: RE1031 said: Oh? Then how is it that u didn't state your reason when u voted? U're kinda contradicting urself.Because I like having reasons other than personal for voting for people. Isn't my current opinion on Crossbell based on how suspicious he is? Right now, I have no town reads on anyone. He's just neutral, I guess. Do u need to guess what is your opinion lel? xD Um, how should I know? U never gave a clear reply as to why Cross is susp/what is your opinion about him now. (Tho now u stated that he is neutral for u, so that's something.) You're being extremely confusing. I'm not contradicting myself at all - had anyone asked my reasoning behind voting for Crossbell, I would have answered (and I did, when you asked). I gave a very clear reply, but didn't feel obligated to give a reason until someone asked because it was way too early to tell. vote: amberwillow Sorry but I'm more comfortable with Grape being town and less with you. Grape I'm sure has his own reasons for going full steam ahead, but you following him is weird. |
...better to be hated for what you are than loved for something you are not. |
followind said: I wouldn't call him a lurker but he isn't the most active either.CorruptedPurity said: Hmm both are agreeable suspicious lynch targets. Me because of my aggressiveness and RE cos of her slip up. I don't think you need to explain that. Why Grrr? Reading an inactive is a gamble. It works but if I were a day cop, I rather use my ability to save/secure a lynch for the day. No one is interested in Grrr, reading him gives him a 3/13 chance of finding scum at the cost that if it's the 10/13, we only have an inactive townie and no proper scum targets. Reevaluating day cop, I think checking on highly active players are a stronger play. It can help save grape if he's town or secure a lynch if he's scum. It can also save me if grape flips town or secure a kill on me if I am mafia. You get the idea. Since if he's a mafia.. He can lurk since it's pretty much his play style when I was playing before Let's just say I'm meta reading since he once played sk and lurked till the end |
| Proud Administrator of the D Gray Man FC and OnePunch-Man FC |
| Okay actually going to sleep this time. But in the meantime Vote: CorruptedPurity it feels right. To anyone reading this read my posts on their own and tell me if the hysteria that is bubbling around me is even remotely deserved. It's possible CPurity is overexcited town, it even makes more sense but the echo chamber of how scummy I am is more than a little bit suspicious. Combine that with the post I'll try to dig up later where CPurity says they don't use meta, then ignores my provided evidence and says my play is different here and that we shouldn't ignore it. And all of this started from two things, me having three votes and putting inactives on notice. That is the entirety of why I am scum. |
logic340 said: followind said: I wouldn't call him a lurker but he isn't the most active either.Since if he's a mafia.. He can lurk since it's pretty much his play style when I was playing before Let's just say I'm meta reading since he once played sk and lurked till the end It's just hard to get a read on Grr.. |
followind said: @Pentaflare Btw.. Nice seeing you again Penta.. Haven't greet you yet xD and Crossbell and lamby too Hi o/ |
Be like this seal. It is a happy seal. ~Review Guidelines~ | ~Recommendation Guidelines~ | ~Mafia Society~ |
followind said: We all tend to overthink. And I have done that in regards to Penta both games I played with him.logic340 said: Yeah..It's likely a reaction test but it could also be a way to gain town credit by looking like they are dong a reaction test. What can scum gain from these reactions besides some nice town credit? This is where paranoia starts.. I'm trying not to think too much nonetheless since I tend to overthink |
| Proud Administrator of the D Gray Man FC and OnePunch-Man FC |
Oyasumi_Rosie said: followind said: God I am going to say the thing that I hate reading the most, but that sounds like the stupidest thing I have ever heard of in a basic game. I am like 85% sure Penta is being sarcastic right now.yes he just claimed I'm not being sarcastic, but I also haven't claimed :P |
Be like this seal. It is a happy seal. ~Review Guidelines~ | ~Recommendation Guidelines~ | ~Mafia Society~ |
CorruptedPurity said: I would think that B works only if it's not the main train by the end of the phase. Cuz if a train forms on a person who flips town then obvioiusly most of the people would be in question, so not a really safe place for scum. There can be many scenarios for what could be if would be, better not to get too deep into it when it is not neccessary.I have nothing on this site to back my methods unfortunately. But don't mistake my idea for scum. Town is free to vote of course, but with good reasoning that is. If you're joining a wagon past 3 members in RVS, a reason should accompany it. A wagon with 3 members already applies pressure, your extra vote will not apply more pressure, if anything, it just shows that either A)you're lazy town and don't want to be bothered with others asking about your vote so you place it on a train or B)you're scum who decides that a train is a safe place to throw your vote as no one would question you. I for one will question you. Anyways, both scenarios are scenarios that we don't want. Furthermore, he didn't explain jack about why he wagoned logic. If he jumped he wagon with even the slightest explanation (even a joke about him being a dog person), it could be overlooked, but no, just a plain vote on the most popular wagon. How does that not raise suspicion to you? Anyway, u seem to give lot's of info of possible cases. |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
CorruptedPurity said: @logic340 You're awfully quiet... Aren't you and grape the "full of theories and reads" brothers? Why are you not contributing anything substantial? @PentaFlare Going to retract that claim? Tell us what you managed to get from our reaction to your claim (I believe that's why you claimed in the first place) What I gained from that? I asked the question to hear from Crossbell, and I still haven't, so the point is moot. |
Be like this seal. It is a happy seal. ~Review Guidelines~ | ~Recommendation Guidelines~ | ~Mafia Society~ |
followind said: CorruptedPurity said: Hmm both are agreeable suspicious lynch targets. Me because of my aggressiveness and RE cos of her slip up. I don't think you need to explain that. Why Grrr? Reading an inactive is a gamble. It works but if I were a day cop, I rather use my ability to save/secure a lynch for the day. No one is interested in Grrr, reading him gives him a 3/13 chance of finding scum at the cost that if it's the 10/13, we only have an inactive townie and no proper scum targets. Reevaluating day cop, I think checking on highly active players are a stronger play. It can help save grape if he's town or secure a lynch if he's scum. It can also save me if grape flips town or secure a kill on me if I am mafia. You get the idea. Since if he's a mafia.. He can lurk since it's pretty much his play style when I was playing before Let's just say I'm meta reading since he once played sk and lurked till the end Ok, this I can work with... Let's think scenarios. Scenario A Grape and Grrr are maf If we day cop read grape maf, we lynch him and send the day cop on Grrr on D2, provided doc protects him at night. He shows guilty and we're down 2 scum. So we can see that in this scenario, cop on Grape rather than Grrr is better. Scenario B Grape is maf and Grrr is town If we day cop read grape maf, we lynch him and send the day cop on Grrr on D2, provided doc protects him at night. He shows inno then we focus on someone else. So we can see that in this scenario, cop on Grape rather than Grrr is better. Scenario C Grape is town, Grrr is maf If we day cop read grape town, we're left with me or RE to lynch. Lynch either then send the cop on him day 2 and we found our maf. Or we can just lynch him direct on Day 1 because D1 is so forgivable and having a lurker burdens the game. Either way, we'll get rid of at least 1 maf at end of 2 days. Scenario D, both are town. We day cop read grape town, we have 1 clear town. Lynch between me RE or grrr. Either gets rid of inactive town or we have 2 cfm clear town by end of day 2 when we send day cop onto Grrr. Still advantageous. If we send day cop on Grrr today, we are at a lost on what to do with Grape and that isn't good. |
 |
CorruptedPurity said: amberwillow said: Oh? Then how is it that u didn't state your reason when u voted? U're kinda contradicting urself. Do u need to guess what is your opinion lel? xD Um, how should I know? U never gave a clear reply as to why Cross is susp/what is your opinion about him now. (Tho now u stated that he is neutral for u, so that's something.) Piqued my interest. Why does RE feel defensive and the need to justify herself during RVS? This caused her to jumble up and slip here and there. I can see a world where she's just careless and town though. But I would prefer to push on this. Care to talk RE? What slip up? I didn't ask on what scale from 1 to 10 Cross is susp now, but your current opinion about him. ^amberwillow said that, which was confusing as heck because if they aren't asking about how suspicious Cross is, then what other opinion is there to give? |
...better to be hated for what you are than loved for something you are not. |
| Catching up. |
Grapefruit21 said: Okay actually going to sleep this time. But in the meantime Vote: CorruptedPurity it feels right. To anyone reading this read my posts on their own and tell me if the hysteria that is bubbling around me is even remotely deserved. It's possible CPurity is overexcited town, it even makes more sense but the echo chamber of how scummy I am is more than a little bit suspicious. Combine that with the post I'll try to dig up later where CPurity says they don't use meta, then ignores my provided evidence and says my play is different here and that we shouldn't ignore it. And all of this started from two things, me having three votes and putting inactives on notice. That is the entirety of why I am scum. Looks to me like an OMGUS, just that I haven't voted you, I just merely poked you around abit. Also, get some sleep, it'll help you build your case against me. Ya, I'm not usually a meta player, I did say that I am making an exception though, if you're looking it up, you should also be able to find the post where I said that. Also, it's not about what you said, it's how you said it. I agree that inactives need to wake up but I don't go and bold it out and centralize it with a "You have been warned". The way you did it made it look like you're staging yourself to be a hero for town, to try to garner their trust. Something I have not seen you done before, thus it raises alarms. |
|
Crossbell said: Catching up. If only you were here like 1 hour ago, I believe we would've plenty to talk about. It just hit midnight here and I'm considering turning in for the night. |
|
| @RE1031 "My vote on Crossbell was because of his vote on logic (and his reasoning). And then other players started joining in, so he became less suspicious because apparently there's lots of residual salt." Why did you have to justify a RVS? "Vote: Crossbell I will let the sinners dog lovers slide for now...." "I prefer to vote for players who I find suspicious. Yeah I wanted to vote for Claire but it didn't really make sense." You didn't explain why you find him suspicious when you voted. Only after willow prompted you. Meh, not a major slip up. Still a slip. Not lynching you over it, pushing you to explain yourself though. |
|
| ^Too lazy to quote that long wall text... Also, it's late and I'm getting less efficient. Will provide more in-depth analysis when I awake. |
|
| May change my vote depending on when the day cop (Penta) returns. Cause that's also pretty suspicious. |
...better to be hated for what you are than loved for something you are not. |
RE1031 said: May change my vote depending on when the day cop (Penta) returns. Cause that's also pretty suspicious. I like this. Everyone has been answering Penta's question but he never answered my question on what are his reads or what information he got out of the claim. May want to push him more on that. |
|
PentaFlare said: What are you playing Penta?CorruptedPurity said: Also, @PentaFlare Gimme your reads of the day. Tell me how you feel about RE and Grape. No thanks. Maybe later. Grapefruit21 said: It may be a bit too exaggerated, but why would talking about who should the cop check be an absurd?.............. This reaction to penta is absurd Why does it being a day cop make you all think it's not a hypothetical question anymore? Really off to bed this time. CorruptedPurity said: I wouldn't be too positive about that lol. As well could have said "But if I am.. then..!"Grapefruit21 said: .............. This reaction to penta is absurd Why does it being a day cop make you all think it's not a hypothetical question anymore? Really off to bed this time. Cause he just said "But I'm day cop" followind said: I cry@Pentaflare Btw.. Nice seeing you again Penta.. Haven't greet you yet xD and Crossbell and lamby too |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
CorruptedPurity said: @RE1031 "My vote on Crossbell was because of his vote on logic (and his reasoning). And then other players started joining in, so he became less suspicious because apparently there's lots of residual salt." Why did you have to justify a RVS? "Vote: Crossbell I will let the sinners dog lovers slide for now...." "I prefer to vote for players who I find suspicious. Yeah I wanted to vote for Claire but it didn't really make sense." You didn't explain why you find him suspicious when you voted. Only after willow prompted you. Meh, not a major slip up. Still a slip. Not lynching you over it, pushing you to explain yourself though. Less of a justification and more of an explanation why I did it instead of voting for Claire. If I'm going to make an RVS vote, I might as well put it on someone I find suspicious, even remotely. |
...better to be hated for what you are than loved for something you are not. |
PentaFlare said: Ah fair, thanksOyasumi_Rosie said: God I am going to say the thing that I hate reading the most, but that sounds like the stupidest thing I have ever heard of in a basic game. I am like 85% sure Penta is being sarcastic right now. I'm not being sarcastic, but I also haven't claimed :P |
 |
I didn't mean we should check on Grr right now, I'm still prioritizing you, grape and RE over them since it will be more beneficial to town.. Grr should only be checked when there is no one else to be checked so that we have a read |
CorruptedPurity said: RE1031 said: May change my vote depending on when the day cop (Penta) returns. Cause that's also pretty suspicious. I like this. Everyone has been answering Penta's question but he never answered my question on what are his reads or what information he got out of the claim. May want to push him more on that. So? My goal wasn't to have everyone answer my question, so I don't see how that is relevant here, or what the point you are trying to make at all is. |
Be like this seal. It is a happy seal. ~Review Guidelines~ | ~Recommendation Guidelines~ | ~Mafia Society~ |
| Sad that things only get entertaining when I'm about to sleep... well, more stuff for me to look through when I awake then I guess. Nights everyone. |
|
Oyasumi_Rosie said: Okay then..Ah fair, thanks I won't stop tunneling on this matter then.. |
| @amberwillow Hi.. I was typing and analyzing at the same time .. Sorry I missed you and Claire I guess |
PentaFlare said: CorruptedPurity said: I like this. Everyone has been answering Penta's question but he never answered my question on what are his reads or what information he got out of the claim. May want to push him more on that. So? My goal wasn't to have everyone answer my question, so I don't see how that is relevant here, or what the point you are trying to make at all is. Point is, you're not being informative to town. You ask for information but you are not willing to give information. You made us have a discussion on day cop uses and whether you're really claiming day cop or not. Not your intention, but it happened anyways. We provided you alot of information and you're just gonna sit back and keep quiet about all these? C'mon, give me something, anything, to work with. |
|
PentaFlare said: CorruptedPurity said: I like this. Everyone has been answering Penta's question but he never answered my question on what are his reads or what information he got out of the claim. May want to push him more on that. So? My goal wasn't to have everyone answer my question, so I don't see how that is relevant here, or what the point you are trying to make at all is. Can you clarify why you claimed (or hypothetically claimed) as day cop? |
...better to be hated for what you are than loved for something you are not. |
| So penta obviously lied, so lets look at other reason to vote other charactes. Unvote I actually echo thoughts about not voting day one, but who am I to let a good tradition die. |
|
RE1031 said: PentaFlare said: So? My goal wasn't to have everyone answer my question, so I don't see how that is relevant here, or what the point you are trying to make at all is. Can you clarify why you claimed (or hypothetically claimed) as day cop? I thought that was very clear. I asked Crossbell a hypothetical question that got warped when other people started answering it. |
Be like this seal. It is a happy seal. ~Review Guidelines~ | ~Recommendation Guidelines~ | ~Mafia Society~ |
CorruptedPurity said: PentaFlare said: So? My goal wasn't to have everyone answer my question, so I don't see how that is relevant here, or what the point you are trying to make at all is. Point is, you're not being informative to town. You ask for information but you are not willing to give information. You made us have a discussion on day cop uses and whether you're really claiming day cop or not. Not your intention, but it happened anyways. We provided you alot of information and you're just gonna sit back and keep quiet about all these? C'mon, give me something, anything, to work with. Yeah. I'm just going to sit back and keep quiet. Ruins the point otherwise |
Be like this seal. It is a happy seal. ~Review Guidelines~ | ~Recommendation Guidelines~ | ~Mafia Society~ |
PentaFlare said: I thought that was very clear. I asked Crossbell a hypothetical question that got warped when other people started answering it. What was your motive behind the hypothetical question, and why were your responses to people asking for reads somewhat trolly? |
...better to be hated for what you are than loved for something you are not. |
RE1031 said: PentaFlare said: I thought that was very clear. I asked Crossbell a hypothetical question that got warped when other people started answering it. What was your motive behind the hypothetical question, and why were your responses to people asking for reads somewhat trolly? My motive isn't important until the question is answered by the person it was intended for. I don't want to give reads right now. |
Be like this seal. It is a happy seal. ~Review Guidelines~ | ~Recommendation Guidelines~ | ~Mafia Society~ |
| Lamby's posts are being unusually cognizant, for the early game. More than I'd expect from him at this stage to be honest? It's weird but I think it's a decently good look for him. I like how he caught the fact that Grape said to move to RE but voted Rosie. followind said: Is that all? What "difference of playstyle" is there between "what players"?My thoughts of this game right now is that there is a difference of playstle between some of the players.. CP said: If you're so content to let others do the poking, then why not do it yourself?Honestly never liked the idea of RVS. Besides, others will do the poking, I can analyse from that, I also have a policy of not voting unless I can support it with good evidence. I disagree with your policy on not voting (I believe that you should vote, early and often, since it is a tool that the town has) but it gets to theory discussion I'm not super interested in doing at the moment. Thanks for the meta information; I see where your thoughts are coming from now with regards to Grapefruit. Personally, I find meta to be a useful tool, but stuff like "this player is active right out of the gate" is not super alignment indicative unless the player has a history of not posting too much as scum. Your points about Grapefruit are thought-provoking, but I'd focus on the content he is providing in THIS game in order to read him, instead of making a comparison between another game and this one. I do think you and Grapefruit are unaligned, though. |
PentaFlare said: If you are just waiting for Crossbell to answer and don't want to give reads what will you be doing now? I hope you can understand why so many are interested in the question you asked of Crossbell. Why is Crossbell's response so much more important than anyone else's?RE1031 said: What was your motive behind the hypothetical question, and why were your responses to people asking for reads somewhat trolly? My motive isn't important until the question is answered by the person it was intended for. I don't want to give reads right now. |
| Proud Administrator of the D Gray Man FC and OnePunch-Man FC |
followind said: what u said here is soooo unsatifying. Everyone can lurk, that's not a good enough reason imo at this point.CorruptedPurity said: Hmm both are agreeable suspicious lynch targets. Me because of my aggressiveness and RE cos of her slip up. I don't think you need to explain that. Why Grrr? Reading an inactive is a gamble. It works but if I were a day cop, I rather use my ability to save/secure a lynch for the day. No one is interested in Grrr, reading him gives him a 3/13 chance of finding scum at the cost that if it's the 10/13, we only have an inactive townie and no proper scum targets. Reevaluating day cop, I think checking on highly active players are a stronger play. It can help save grape if he's town or secure a lynch if he's scum. It can also save me if grape flips town or secure a kill on me if I am mafia. You get the idea. Since if he's a mafia.. He can lurk since it's pretty much his play style when I was playing before Let's just say I'm meta reading since he once played sk and lurked till the end logic340 said: They could get info of what town thinks and how should they approach peeps so that they wouldn't be suspicious?followind said: It's likely a reaction test but it could also be a way to gain town credit by looking like they are dong a reaction test. What can scum gain from these reactions besides some nice town credit?OK I accept your logic.. Since this is just a basic game.. Let's draw to a simple one then.. He's using day cop to get reads RE1031 said: Am I? For your information, I am trying to fish some scums here and see whenever u should be letted off the hook.amberwillow said: Oh? Then how is it that u didn't state your reason when u voted? U're kinda contradicting urself. Do u need to guess what is your opinion lel? xD Um, how should I know? U never gave a clear reply as to why Cross is susp/what is your opinion about him now. (Tho now u stated that he is neutral for u, so that's something.) You're being extremely confusing. I'm not contradicting myself at all - had anyone asked my reasoning behind voting for Crossbell, I would have answered (and I did, when you asked). I gave a very clear reply, but didn't feel obligated to give a reason until someone asked because it was way too early to tell. vote: amberwillow Sorry but I'm more comfortable with Grape being town and less with you. Grape I'm sure has his own reasons for going full steam ahead, but you following him is weird. Right here, u took a path to paint me bad instead of simply elaborating to what I had asked, and that my friend, I find fishy. U said that u like to have a reason when u vote someone, but u didn't, so u could as well think of some excuse when u are asked. For a person who states what u had stated, I would presume that they would actually state that reason when voting, otherwise that vote doesn't hold any power to it. And no, at least I didn't find you very clear, it seems to me that u have been avoiding the main points of what I asked. Oh? And what makes you think that I am following him? o.O |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
logic340 said: PentaFlare said: If you are just waiting for Crossbell to answer and don't want to give reads what will you be doing now? I hope you can understand why so many are interested in the question you asked of Crossbell. Why is Crossbell's response so much more important than anyone else's?My motive isn't important until the question is answered by the person it was intended for. I don't want to give reads right now. I'll probably spend my time paying attention in class. I had a reason for asking Crossbell, the rest of this discussion is just a really nice bonus. |
Be like this seal. It is a happy seal. ~Review Guidelines~ | ~Recommendation Guidelines~ | ~Mafia Society~ |
| Addendum to that post: I'm glad to play with you too, CP. Hopefully you're town so we can catch all the scum together and ride peacefully into the sunset. CP said: Yes, that was the thing I was asking Grapefruit about. We need to take our chances at RVS analysis and Grapefruit deciding to move off of logic was a bit of a question mark.Note: Was on logic train before jumping around. If his only intention is being on a train, logic's train would do just fine. Why jump onto RE's train instead and make it a 3-way tie? PentaFlare said: Check logic or Grapefruit, or me if you want me to eat the NK N1. If you're a daycop, I think the best EV play is to check the strongest players, in order to clear or condemn them as town or scum.@Crossbell Let's say I'm a day cop. Who should I check this very moment and why? |
PentaFlare said: 1. I mean what would you be doing in regards to this game.....logic340 said: If you are just waiting for Crossbell to answer and don't want to give reads what will you be doing now? I hope you can understand why so many are interested in the question you asked of Crossbell. Why is Crossbell's response so much more important than anyone else's? I'll probably spend my time paying attention in class. I had a reason for asking Crossbell, the rest of this discussion is just a really nice bonus. 2. Fair enough we'll see where this leads us. |
| Proud Administrator of the D Gray Man FC and OnePunch-Man FC |
| Either you check one of the strongest players so that we know that we have an experienced and valuable member on our side, or if they're scum, we probably won't be able to piece it together until the end. That's my reasoning, regardless. |
Crossbell said: Who are the strongest players in your opinion?Either you check one of the strongest players so that we know that we have an experienced and valuable member on our side, or if they're scum, we probably won't be able to piece it together until the end. That's my reasoning, regardless. |
|
| If we're not counting me: Logic, Grapefruit, PentaFlare are people who can be analytical juggernauts later in the game and whom opinions I respect. I also feel like CP is pretty competent, so he can go into that bucket as well I think. |
RE1031 said: Is this is what sounded confusing with you? I apologise if I worded it incomprehensibly and made u to misunderstand, but I meant to ask your opinion about the posts he made. Do u agree or disagree with what he said? What do u think of his questions? And such. U are the one who placed a vote on him, so shouldn't u try to read more into him to see whenever u should keep it there or not? Or just having others to vote the same person as he did with an innocent reason is enough to not look into him?I didn't ask on what scale from 1 to 10 Cross is susp now, but your current opinion about him. ^amberwillow said that, which was confusing as heck because if they aren't asking about how suspicious Cross is, then what other opinion is there to give? |
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious |
RE said: Then who is the scum on the wagon, then? Logic, Rosie, or Penta?The way you jump around your votes is definitely a different kind of gameplay. Still not exactly pro-town, but a bit too obvious. So while it's tempting to vote for you, I'm far more inclined to believe that people joining your wagon are more likely to be mafia. |
Crossbell said: Addendum to that post: I'm glad to play with you too, CP. Hopefully you're town so we can catch all the scum together and ride peacefully into the sunset. CP said: Yes, that was the thing I was asking Grapefruit about. We need to take our chances at RVS analysis and Grapefruit deciding to move off of logic was a bit of a question mark.Note: Was on logic train before jumping around. If his only intention is being on a train, logic's train would do just fine. Why jump onto RE's train instead and make it a 3-way tie? PentaFlare said: Check logic or Grapefruit, or me if you want me to eat the NK N1. If you're a daycop, I think the best EV play is to check the strongest players, in order to clear or condemn them as town or scum.@Crossbell Let's say I'm a day cop. Who should I check this very moment and why? Cool, thanks. |
Be like this seal. It is a happy seal. ~Review Guidelines~ | ~Recommendation Guidelines~ | ~Mafia Society~ |
More topics from this board
» [GAME] Say something about the person above you ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Haine - Jul 19, 2014 |
3813 |
by Serafos
»»
Yesterday, 1:10 AM |
|
» [GAME] Give something to the user above you ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Soren - Oct 9, 2015 |
1395 |
by Serafos
»»
Dec 13, 9:10 PM |
|
» [GAME] Last Letter Game ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )grave_robber - Sep 9, 2014 |
8755 |
by Serafos
»»
Dec 11, 7:29 PM |
|
» [GAME] (*￣･￣)ﾉ Count to 30 Before a Slightly Inebriated MEMBER Posts! v1 ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )SoulEaterQUEEN - Mar 26, 2016 |
1996 |
by Serafos
»»
Dec 7, 10:20 PM |
|
» [GAME] (*￣･￣)ﾉ Count to 30 Before a Slightly Inebriated Staff Member Posts! v4 ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Togs - Jul 2, 2017 |
2877 |
by Serafos
»»
Dec 7, 10:20 PM |