New
Dec 16, 6:06 PM
#51
| Every time I recommend Rent A Girlfriend to someone they get pissed off and that applies to both the ones that know about it and the ones that don't know about it |
Dec 16, 7:29 PM
#52
Reply to Deathko
Gentropy said:
In the same way an atheist couldn't stomach watching Little House on the Prairie, a religious person couldn't stomach watching Sex and the City. There are some works that are just incompatible with certain people.
In the same way an atheist couldn't stomach watching Little House on the Prairie, a religious person couldn't stomach watching Sex and the City. There are some works that are just incompatible with certain people.
Weird. I'm an atheist, I think Little house on the Prairie is boring, but not an excruciating experience that makes me hate the world. I enjoy some religious art, and don't feel any kind of hatred towards folks who don't want to fuck before marriage. I'm not sure trying to rationalize your stance like you did really works. Most people seem comfortable comfronting their views to the real world, and with the fact others might not think like them.
| @Deathko This is a crock of bull. The average person would not want to watch a show involving—just a hypothetical example—a father's incestuous relationship with his twelve-year-old daughter. If he was a one-off character and met a brutal end, maybe, but not if it's the premise of the show and it's being portrayed in a positive light. Nana or Scum's Wish would be the equivalent for me. My level of hatred and revulsion for those series' characters would be the same as an average middle-aged woman's watching a new series starring Diddy in his pursuit of little boys. And instead of condemning him for it, the show actively paints him as some kind of tragic figure too good for this world. Would you deign to tell that woman that ACTUALLY watching the Diddy show lets you see the world with a different pair of eyes, or something equally vague and optimistic? She'd look at you crazy if you did. THAT'S why I brought up Horimiya and His and Her Circumstances: I don't like those shows and their romances, but it's the halfway point I'm willing to walk to. Being selectively minded isn't the same as being close-minded, and being open-minded isn't always the ideal mindset to have. 'Most people' are only comfortable confronting their views so long as the alternative is at least somewhat socially acceptable. If there was a documentary detailing the Third Reich and why Hitler killed those some-odd few thousand Chosenites, would the average man or woman in [insert western country here] rrrreeeeaaalllllllyyyy go into it with an open mind looking for a fresh perspective? Little House on the Prairie was just the first thing that came to my head when thinking of wholesome, milquetoast, Christian TV programming. You personally didn't burst into flames just at a mere glance of it... and that's wonderful! I'm sure you didn't roll your eyes at all at every episode's moral quandary being chalked up to "just have faith in the Lord!" Definitely not. Everyone has their biases and will gravitate towards the works that cater to those biases. Me putting on Rick and Morty or something equally cringe and contradictory to my own beliefs doesn't make me a better person or more understanding of the "fact that others might not think like me." It just means I'm a mook with too much time to kill. |
Dec 16, 8:57 PM
#53
Reply to Gentropy
@Deathko This is a crock of bull. The average person would not want to watch a show involving—just a hypothetical example—a father's incestuous relationship with his twelve-year-old daughter. If he was a one-off character and met a brutal end, maybe, but not if it's the premise of the show and it's being portrayed in a positive light.
Nana or Scum's Wish would be the equivalent for me. My level of hatred and revulsion for those series' characters would be the same as an average middle-aged woman's watching a new series starring Diddy in his pursuit of little boys. And instead of condemning him for it, the show actively paints him as some kind of tragic figure too good for this world. Would you deign to tell that woman that ACTUALLY watching the Diddy show lets you see the world with a different pair of eyes, or something equally vague and optimistic? She'd look at you crazy if you did.
THAT'S why I brought up Horimiya and His and Her Circumstances: I don't like those shows and their romances, but it's the halfway point I'm willing to walk to. Being selectively minded isn't the same as being close-minded, and being open-minded isn't always the ideal mindset to have.
'Most people' are only comfortable confronting their views so long as the alternative is at least somewhat socially acceptable. If there was a documentary detailing the Third Reich and why Hitler killed those some-odd few thousand Chosenites, would the average man or woman in [insert western country here] rrrreeeeaaalllllllyyyy go into it with an open mind looking for a fresh perspective?
Little House on the Prairie was just the first thing that came to my head when thinking of wholesome, milquetoast, Christian TV programming. You personally didn't burst into flames just at a mere glance of it... and that's wonderful! I'm sure you didn't roll your eyes at all at every episode's moral quandary being chalked up to "just have faith in the Lord!" Definitely not.
Everyone has their biases and will gravitate towards the works that cater to those biases. Me putting on Rick and Morty or something equally cringe and contradictory to my own beliefs doesn't make me a better person or more understanding of the "fact that others might not think like me."
It just means I'm a mook with too much time to kill.
Nana or Scum's Wish would be the equivalent for me. My level of hatred and revulsion for those series' characters would be the same as an average middle-aged woman's watching a new series starring Diddy in his pursuit of little boys. And instead of condemning him for it, the show actively paints him as some kind of tragic figure too good for this world. Would you deign to tell that woman that ACTUALLY watching the Diddy show lets you see the world with a different pair of eyes, or something equally vague and optimistic? She'd look at you crazy if you did.
THAT'S why I brought up Horimiya and His and Her Circumstances: I don't like those shows and their romances, but it's the halfway point I'm willing to walk to. Being selectively minded isn't the same as being close-minded, and being open-minded isn't always the ideal mindset to have.
'Most people' are only comfortable confronting their views so long as the alternative is at least somewhat socially acceptable. If there was a documentary detailing the Third Reich and why Hitler killed those some-odd few thousand Chosenites, would the average man or woman in [insert western country here] rrrreeeeaaalllllllyyyy go into it with an open mind looking for a fresh perspective?
Little House on the Prairie was just the first thing that came to my head when thinking of wholesome, milquetoast, Christian TV programming. You personally didn't burst into flames just at a mere glance of it... and that's wonderful! I'm sure you didn't roll your eyes at all at every episode's moral quandary being chalked up to "just have faith in the Lord!" Definitely not.
Everyone has their biases and will gravitate towards the works that cater to those biases. Me putting on Rick and Morty or something equally cringe and contradictory to my own beliefs doesn't make me a better person or more understanding of the "fact that others might not think like me."
It just means I'm a mook with too much time to kill.
| @Gentropy I'm sure you're not trying to say consensual sex between two adults is as morally reprehensible to you than grown powerful people abusing children. Besides, you have tons of late night "criminal" shows about Diddy or some horrible adulterous murders precisely for those middle-aged women... Half those shows are very clearly made with a christian audience in mind. I don't think I said you should watch them expecting to have some kind of revelation that changes your mind. I can read Heinlein's Starship Trooper and appreciate it for what it is (a somewhat libertarian pamphlet disguised as great military sci-fi), disagree with most of it and still entertain his ideas on corporal punishment, citizenship, democracy etc without getting upset or feeling like my core values are being attacked. Same for Philip K Dick's anti abortion short story. I think I'll skip the WW2 conspiracy part of your comment for the greater good. If the show is obvious christian propaganda with shit writing, sure, I'll roll my eyes. I'll do the same if it's obvious atheist propaganda (like that happens...) with shit writing. The problem here isn't that it's christian or atheist, the problem is that it's shit. Why would I care if a movie reaffirms my beliefs and pats me on the back every five minutes? I just want it to be good. I'm sure you do it to to an extent. Did you like Versailles no Bara because you approve of crossdressing; or did you like it because it was well-written, had a clever setting that allowed it to bring some social commentary while also conjuring Joan of Arc's image, had something compelling to say about us as a species or culture (wether you approve of the message), and was a good anime in general? From what I can get from our interaction, I'd think some of it would rub you the wrong way, yet you decided to put it in your favs above tons of slop that was mediocre but probably easier on your core values. Am I wrong? Nice favs btw. NGE, Maison Ikkoku, Macross and Area 88? Yeah, I'm sold. Do yourself a favor and finish the Planetes manga. It's actually quite different from the anime, so at worst you're getting an alternative story. But I honestly think the anime can't hold a candle to it. |
DeathkoDec 16, 9:12 PM
Prophetess of the Golden Era |
Dec 16, 10:15 PM
#54
Reply to Deathko
@Gentropy I'm sure you're not trying to say consensual sex between two adults is as morally reprehensible to you than grown powerful people abusing children. Besides, you have tons of late night "criminal" shows about Diddy or some horrible adulterous murders precisely for those middle-aged women... Half those shows are very clearly made with a christian audience in mind.
I don't think I said you should watch them expecting to have some kind of revelation that changes your mind. I can read Heinlein's Starship Trooper and appreciate it for what it is (a somewhat libertarian pamphlet disguised as great military sci-fi), disagree with most of it and still entertain his ideas on corporal punishment, citizenship, democracy etc without getting upset or feeling like my core values are being attacked. Same for Philip K Dick's anti abortion short story.
I think I'll skip the WW2 conspiracy part of your comment for the greater good.
If the show is obvious christian propaganda with shit writing, sure, I'll roll my eyes. I'll do the same if it's obvious atheist propaganda (like that happens...) with shit writing. The problem here isn't that it's christian or atheist, the problem is that it's shit. Why would I care if a movie reaffirms my beliefs and pats me on the back every five minutes? I just want it to be good.
I'm sure you do it to to an extent. Did you like Versailles no Bara because you approve of crossdressing; or did you like it because it was well-written, had a clever setting that allowed it to bring some social commentary while also conjuring Joan of Arc's image, had something compelling to say about us as a species or culture (wether you approve of the message), and was a good anime in general? From what I can get from our interaction, I'd think some of it would rub you the wrong way, yet you decided to put it in your favs above tons of slop that was mediocre but probably easier on your core values. Am I wrong?
Nice favs btw. NGE, Maison Ikkoku, Macross and Area 88? Yeah, I'm sold. Do yourself a favor and finish the Planetes manga. It's actually quite different from the anime, so at worst you're getting an alternative story. But I honestly think the anime can't hold a candle to it.
I don't think I said you should watch them expecting to have some kind of revelation that changes your mind. I can read Heinlein's Starship Trooper and appreciate it for what it is (a somewhat libertarian pamphlet disguised as great military sci-fi), disagree with most of it and still entertain his ideas on corporal punishment, citizenship, democracy etc without getting upset or feeling like my core values are being attacked. Same for Philip K Dick's anti abortion short story.
I think I'll skip the WW2 conspiracy part of your comment for the greater good.
If the show is obvious christian propaganda with shit writing, sure, I'll roll my eyes. I'll do the same if it's obvious atheist propaganda (like that happens...) with shit writing. The problem here isn't that it's christian or atheist, the problem is that it's shit. Why would I care if a movie reaffirms my beliefs and pats me on the back every five minutes? I just want it to be good.
I'm sure you do it to to an extent. Did you like Versailles no Bara because you approve of crossdressing; or did you like it because it was well-written, had a clever setting that allowed it to bring some social commentary while also conjuring Joan of Arc's image, had something compelling to say about us as a species or culture (wether you approve of the message), and was a good anime in general? From what I can get from our interaction, I'd think some of it would rub you the wrong way, yet you decided to put it in your favs above tons of slop that was mediocre but probably easier on your core values. Am I wrong?
Nice favs btw. NGE, Maison Ikkoku, Macross and Area 88? Yeah, I'm sold. Do yourself a favor and finish the Planetes manga. It's actually quite different from the anime, so at worst you're getting an alternative story. But I honestly think the anime can't hold a candle to it.
Deathko said: I'm sure you're not tring to say consensual sex between two adults is as morally reprehensible to you than grown powerful people abusing children. No no no, I said "a father's incestuous relationship with his twelve-year-old daughter" that was "portrayed in a positive light." I'm sure he wouldn't abuse her... unless you're operating on the basis that any relationship where one partner is of a questionable age is inherently abusive. In which case, you just prove my point. Also, to answer your question: Sure. In some contexts, sure. Deathko said: Besides, you have tons of late night "criminal" shows about Diddy or some horrible adulterous murders precisely for those middle-aged women... Half those shows are very clearly made with a christian audience in mind. ... So you're just gonna ignore the hypothetical entirely? It wouldn't be quite the same if Diddy's actions were actively portrayed as "just another walk of life" now would it? Deathko said: don't think I said you should watch them expecting to have some kind of revelation that changes your mind. I can read Heinlein's Starship Trooper and appreciate it for what it is (a somewhat libertarian pamphlet disguised as great military sci-fi), disagree with most of it and still entertain his ideas on corporal punishment, citizenship, democracy etc without getting upset or feeling like my core values are being attacked. Same for Philip K Dick's anti abortion novel. Great. Good for you. "My anecdotal experience negates everything you said about the "majority" of people, or the "average" person. Because I can't look past my own experiences as a frame of reference." On a related note: Total Bug Death. Deathko said: I think I'll skip the WW2 conspiracy part of your comment for the greater good. Just further proving my point lol. Alright, fiiiiiiiinnnnneeee, I'll rewrite it: If there was a documentary detailing the Third Reich and why Hitler killed those 6 BILLION Chosenites, would the average man or woman in [insert western country here] rrrreeeeaaalllllllyyyy go into it with an open mind looking for a fresh perspective? Happy now? Now will you answer the question? Deathko said: I'll do the same if it's obvious atheist propaganda (like that happens...) LMAO you only type that sarcastically because it's written for you and your ilk. It just so happens that most modern works are atheistic in nature. Because there's no reason whatsoever for every majorly published work of fiction in the last 15 or so years to be Godless, Nihlistic, debauched drek used to cater to Satanic soy-sipping millennials. That definitely doesn't happen. Ever. Deathko said: The problem here isn't that it's christian or atheist, the problem is that it's shit. Why would I care if a movie reaffirms my beliefs and pats me on the back every five minutes? I just want it to be good. Watch the wholesome Diddy show or the wholesome father-daughter romance then. If you don't want shows to just constantly reaffirm your beliefs, then you shouldn't have any problems. See how stupid that sounds? My point is that for a majority of people, works of fiction that fall outside of the Overton window are looked upon with disgust. Any of the hypotheticals I conjured up that this would apply to was met with an expected reaction from you. My personal (emphasis put on that) limit would be shows like Scum's Wish and Nana. Is this hard for you to understand because you can't fathom the thought of someone being revolted by lauded degeneracy? Something like Rent-A-Girlfriend isn't universally hated because of the writing, or art, or whatever else you said: it's because the MC is a cuck and the feMC is a prostitute. That's it. It's disgusting. The same can be said for series like School Days. Do you really think most people hate them for some objective reason? Deathko said: Did you like Versailles no Bara because you approve of crossdressing; or did you like it because it was well-written, had a clever setting that allowed it to bring some social commentary while also conjuring Joan of Arc's image, had something compelling to say about us as a species or culture (wether you approve of the message), and was a good anime in general? Nice gotcha. The cross-dressing was given a contextual purpose and didn't offend me. The same with the other contentious story elements: I didn't agree with all of them, but they didn't outright disgust or offend me. The sole exception being Marie-Antoinette, whose ending was sweet and cathartic. Definitely not the feeling they were going for, but an enjoyable experience nonetheless. And why does any of this matter? Why do you think pointing out these apparent contradictions disproves what I'm saying? Oscar dressing like a man doesn't revolt me—especially if a major theme of the story is that she's just a woman in the end anyway. Deathko said: Nice favs btw. NGE, Maison Ikkoku, Macross and Area 88? Yeah, I'm sold Thanks for checking my profile out. Are you pointing these out because you think they run in contradiction to what I'm saying, or because you think I'm a poser? If it's the former, you should've namedropped Princess Kaguya (you already did Rose of Versailles.) And if it's the latter, you should've namedropped Ashita no Joe... because it's not like Dragon Ball is in my favorites or anything, lmao. Deathko said: Do yourself a favor and finish the Planetes manga. It's actually quite different from the anime, so at worst you're getting an alternative story. But I honestly think the anime can't hold a candle to it. It's written by that cuck Yukimura, sooooo that's gonna be a hard no from me. |
Dec 16, 10:30 PM
#55
Reply to Gentropy
Deathko said:
I'm sure you're not tring to say consensual sex between two adults is as morally reprehensible to you than grown powerful people abusing children.
I'm sure you're not tring to say consensual sex between two adults is as morally reprehensible to you than grown powerful people abusing children.
No no no, I said "a father's incestuous relationship with his twelve-year-old daughter" that was "portrayed in a positive light." I'm sure he wouldn't abuse her... unless you're operating on the basis that any relationship where one partner is of a questionable age is inherently abusive.
In which case, you just prove my point. Also, to answer your question: Sure. In some contexts, sure.
Deathko said:
Besides, you have tons of late night "criminal" shows about Diddy or some horrible adulterous murders precisely for those middle-aged women... Half those shows are very clearly made with a christian audience in mind.
Besides, you have tons of late night "criminal" shows about Diddy or some horrible adulterous murders precisely for those middle-aged women... Half those shows are very clearly made with a christian audience in mind.
... So you're just gonna ignore the hypothetical entirely? It wouldn't be quite the same if Diddy's actions were actively portrayed as "just another walk of life" now would it?
Deathko said:
don't think I said you should watch them expecting to have some kind of revelation that changes your mind. I can read Heinlein's Starship Trooper and appreciate it for what it is (a somewhat libertarian pamphlet disguised as great military sci-fi), disagree with most of it and still entertain his ideas on corporal punishment, citizenship, democracy etc without getting upset or feeling like my core values are being attacked. Same for Philip K Dick's anti abortion novel.
don't think I said you should watch them expecting to have some kind of revelation that changes your mind. I can read Heinlein's Starship Trooper and appreciate it for what it is (a somewhat libertarian pamphlet disguised as great military sci-fi), disagree with most of it and still entertain his ideas on corporal punishment, citizenship, democracy etc without getting upset or feeling like my core values are being attacked. Same for Philip K Dick's anti abortion novel.
Great. Good for you. "My anecdotal experience negates everything you said about the "majority" of people, or the "average" person. Because I can't look past my own experiences as a frame of reference."
On a related note: Total Bug Death.
Deathko said:
I think I'll skip the WW2 conspiracy part of your comment for the greater good.
I think I'll skip the WW2 conspiracy part of your comment for the greater good.
Just further proving my point lol. Alright, fiiiiiiiinnnnneeee, I'll rewrite it: If there was a documentary detailing the Third Reich and why Hitler killed those 6 BILLION Chosenites, would the average man or woman in [insert western country here] rrrreeeeaaalllllllyyyy go into it with an open mind looking for a fresh perspective?
Happy now? Now will you answer the question?
Deathko said:
I'll do the same if it's obvious atheist propaganda (like that happens...)
I'll do the same if it's obvious atheist propaganda (like that happens...)
LMAO you only type that sarcastically because it's written for you and your ilk. It just so happens that most modern works are atheistic in nature. Because there's no reason whatsoever for every majorly published work of fiction in the last 15 or so years to be Godless, Nihlistic, debauched drek used to cater to Satanic soy-sipping millennials. That definitely doesn't happen. Ever.
Deathko said:
The problem here isn't that it's christian or atheist, the problem is that it's shit. Why would I care if a movie reaffirms my beliefs and pats me on the back every five minutes? I just want it to be good.
The problem here isn't that it's christian or atheist, the problem is that it's shit. Why would I care if a movie reaffirms my beliefs and pats me on the back every five minutes? I just want it to be good.
Watch the wholesome Diddy show or the wholesome father-daughter romance then. If you don't want shows to just constantly reaffirm your beliefs, then you shouldn't have any problems.
See how stupid that sounds? My point is that for a majority of people, works of fiction that fall outside of the Overton window are looked upon with disgust. Any of the hypotheticals I conjured up that this would apply to was met with an expected reaction from you.
My personal (emphasis put on that) limit would be shows like Scum's Wish and Nana. Is this hard for you to understand because you can't fathom the thought of someone being revolted by lauded degeneracy? Something like Rent-A-Girlfriend isn't universally hated because of the writing, or art, or whatever else you said: it's because the MC is a cuck and the feMC is a prostitute. That's it. It's disgusting. The same can be said for series like School Days. Do you really think most people hate them for some objective reason?
Deathko said:
Did you like Versailles no Bara because you approve of crossdressing; or did you like it because it was well-written, had a clever setting that allowed it to bring some social commentary while also conjuring Joan of Arc's image, had something compelling to say about us as a species or culture (wether you approve of the message), and was a good anime in general?
Did you like Versailles no Bara because you approve of crossdressing; or did you like it because it was well-written, had a clever setting that allowed it to bring some social commentary while also conjuring Joan of Arc's image, had something compelling to say about us as a species or culture (wether you approve of the message), and was a good anime in general?
Nice gotcha. The cross-dressing was given a contextual purpose and didn't offend me. The same with the other contentious story elements: I didn't agree with all of them, but they didn't outright disgust or offend me.
The sole exception being Marie-Antoinette, whose ending was sweet and cathartic. Definitely not the feeling they were going for, but an enjoyable experience nonetheless.
And why does any of this matter? Why do you think pointing out these apparent contradictions disproves what I'm saying? Oscar dressing like a man doesn't revolt me—especially if a major theme of the story is that she's just a woman in the end anyway.
Deathko said:
Nice favs btw. NGE, Maison Ikkoku, Macross and Area 88? Yeah, I'm sold
Nice favs btw. NGE, Maison Ikkoku, Macross and Area 88? Yeah, I'm sold
Thanks for checking my profile out. Are you pointing these out because you think they run in contradiction to what I'm saying, or because you think I'm a poser?
If it's the former, you should've namedropped Princess Kaguya (you already did Rose of Versailles.)
And if it's the latter, you should've namedropped Ashita no Joe... because it's not like Dragon Ball is in my favorites or anything, lmao.
Deathko said:
Do yourself a favor and finish the Planetes manga. It's actually quite different from the anime, so at worst you're getting an alternative story. But I honestly think the anime can't hold a candle to it.
Do yourself a favor and finish the Planetes manga. It's actually quite different from the anime, so at worst you're getting an alternative story. But I honestly think the anime can't hold a candle to it.
It's written by that cuck Yukimura, sooooo that's gonna be a hard no from me.
Gentropy said: LMAO you only type that sarcastically because it's written for you and your ilk. It just so happens that most modern works are atheistic in nature. Because there's no reason whatsoever for every majorly published work of fiction in the last 15 or so years to be Godless, Nihlistic, debauched drek used to cater to Satanic soy-sipping millennials. That definitely doesn't happen. Ever. The trend isn't even entirely new. His Dark Materials came out in the 90s. (To be clear, I agree with the point you're making.) Gentropy said: The same can be said for series like School Days. Do you really think most people hate them for some objective reason? The main problem I have with School Days is that 11 of the episodes are boring. |
| その目だれの目? |
Dec 16, 10:49 PM
#56
Reply to Lucifrost
Gentropy said:
LMAO you only type that sarcastically because it's written for you and your ilk. It just so happens that most modern works are atheistic in nature. Because there's no reason whatsoever for every majorly published work of fiction in the last 15 or so years to be Godless, Nihlistic, debauched drek used to cater to Satanic soy-sipping millennials. That definitely doesn't happen. Ever.
LMAO you only type that sarcastically because it's written for you and your ilk. It just so happens that most modern works are atheistic in nature. Because there's no reason whatsoever for every majorly published work of fiction in the last 15 or so years to be Godless, Nihlistic, debauched drek used to cater to Satanic soy-sipping millennials. That definitely doesn't happen. Ever.
The trend isn't even entirely new. His Dark Materials came out in the 90s. (To be clear, I agree with the point you're making.)
Gentropy said:
The same can be said for series like School Days. Do you really think most people hate them for some objective reason?
The same can be said for series like School Days. Do you really think most people hate them for some objective reason?
The main problem I have with School Days is that 11 of the episodes are boring.
Lucifrost said: The trend isn't even entirely new. His Dark Materials came out in the 90s. (To be clear, I agree with the point you're making.) You're right, I was just referring to the sheer volume of applicable works in the 2010s onward. They existed in the 70s through the 2000s but they weren't as prevalent as they are now. HDM is a good callback with the evil Pope dude though (it's been forever since I read it, but I know exactly what you mean.) |
Yesterday, 6:43 AM
#57
Yesterday, 7:02 AM
#58
| Oh, recommend anything made after the 2000s to old heads who think anime peaked with VHS fansubs and cel dust, and they’ll fume. Instant rage. Blood pressure spikes, foam at the mouth, full “anime is dead” sermon. You’re not just offending them, you’re sending them straight into a stress-induced meltdown, one modern art style away from a heart attack. |
Yesterday, 7:03 AM
#59
| The solution is very simple. Don't recommend any anime shows to anyone. And nobody gets offended. |
Today, 8:26 AM
#60
Reply to Gentropy
Deathko said:
I'm sure you're not tring to say consensual sex between two adults is as morally reprehensible to you than grown powerful people abusing children.
I'm sure you're not tring to say consensual sex between two adults is as morally reprehensible to you than grown powerful people abusing children.
No no no, I said "a father's incestuous relationship with his twelve-year-old daughter" that was "portrayed in a positive light." I'm sure he wouldn't abuse her... unless you're operating on the basis that any relationship where one partner is of a questionable age is inherently abusive.
In which case, you just prove my point. Also, to answer your question: Sure. In some contexts, sure.
Deathko said:
Besides, you have tons of late night "criminal" shows about Diddy or some horrible adulterous murders precisely for those middle-aged women... Half those shows are very clearly made with a christian audience in mind.
Besides, you have tons of late night "criminal" shows about Diddy or some horrible adulterous murders precisely for those middle-aged women... Half those shows are very clearly made with a christian audience in mind.
... So you're just gonna ignore the hypothetical entirely? It wouldn't be quite the same if Diddy's actions were actively portrayed as "just another walk of life" now would it?
Deathko said:
don't think I said you should watch them expecting to have some kind of revelation that changes your mind. I can read Heinlein's Starship Trooper and appreciate it for what it is (a somewhat libertarian pamphlet disguised as great military sci-fi), disagree with most of it and still entertain his ideas on corporal punishment, citizenship, democracy etc without getting upset or feeling like my core values are being attacked. Same for Philip K Dick's anti abortion novel.
don't think I said you should watch them expecting to have some kind of revelation that changes your mind. I can read Heinlein's Starship Trooper and appreciate it for what it is (a somewhat libertarian pamphlet disguised as great military sci-fi), disagree with most of it and still entertain his ideas on corporal punishment, citizenship, democracy etc without getting upset or feeling like my core values are being attacked. Same for Philip K Dick's anti abortion novel.
Great. Good for you. "My anecdotal experience negates everything you said about the "majority" of people, or the "average" person. Because I can't look past my own experiences as a frame of reference."
On a related note: Total Bug Death.
Deathko said:
I think I'll skip the WW2 conspiracy part of your comment for the greater good.
I think I'll skip the WW2 conspiracy part of your comment for the greater good.
Just further proving my point lol. Alright, fiiiiiiiinnnnneeee, I'll rewrite it: If there was a documentary detailing the Third Reich and why Hitler killed those 6 BILLION Chosenites, would the average man or woman in [insert western country here] rrrreeeeaaalllllllyyyy go into it with an open mind looking for a fresh perspective?
Happy now? Now will you answer the question?
Deathko said:
I'll do the same if it's obvious atheist propaganda (like that happens...)
I'll do the same if it's obvious atheist propaganda (like that happens...)
LMAO you only type that sarcastically because it's written for you and your ilk. It just so happens that most modern works are atheistic in nature. Because there's no reason whatsoever for every majorly published work of fiction in the last 15 or so years to be Godless, Nihlistic, debauched drek used to cater to Satanic soy-sipping millennials. That definitely doesn't happen. Ever.
Deathko said:
The problem here isn't that it's christian or atheist, the problem is that it's shit. Why would I care if a movie reaffirms my beliefs and pats me on the back every five minutes? I just want it to be good.
The problem here isn't that it's christian or atheist, the problem is that it's shit. Why would I care if a movie reaffirms my beliefs and pats me on the back every five minutes? I just want it to be good.
Watch the wholesome Diddy show or the wholesome father-daughter romance then. If you don't want shows to just constantly reaffirm your beliefs, then you shouldn't have any problems.
See how stupid that sounds? My point is that for a majority of people, works of fiction that fall outside of the Overton window are looked upon with disgust. Any of the hypotheticals I conjured up that this would apply to was met with an expected reaction from you.
My personal (emphasis put on that) limit would be shows like Scum's Wish and Nana. Is this hard for you to understand because you can't fathom the thought of someone being revolted by lauded degeneracy? Something like Rent-A-Girlfriend isn't universally hated because of the writing, or art, or whatever else you said: it's because the MC is a cuck and the feMC is a prostitute. That's it. It's disgusting. The same can be said for series like School Days. Do you really think most people hate them for some objective reason?
Deathko said:
Did you like Versailles no Bara because you approve of crossdressing; or did you like it because it was well-written, had a clever setting that allowed it to bring some social commentary while also conjuring Joan of Arc's image, had something compelling to say about us as a species or culture (wether you approve of the message), and was a good anime in general?
Did you like Versailles no Bara because you approve of crossdressing; or did you like it because it was well-written, had a clever setting that allowed it to bring some social commentary while also conjuring Joan of Arc's image, had something compelling to say about us as a species or culture (wether you approve of the message), and was a good anime in general?
Nice gotcha. The cross-dressing was given a contextual purpose and didn't offend me. The same with the other contentious story elements: I didn't agree with all of them, but they didn't outright disgust or offend me.
The sole exception being Marie-Antoinette, whose ending was sweet and cathartic. Definitely not the feeling they were going for, but an enjoyable experience nonetheless.
And why does any of this matter? Why do you think pointing out these apparent contradictions disproves what I'm saying? Oscar dressing like a man doesn't revolt me—especially if a major theme of the story is that she's just a woman in the end anyway.
Deathko said:
Nice favs btw. NGE, Maison Ikkoku, Macross and Area 88? Yeah, I'm sold
Nice favs btw. NGE, Maison Ikkoku, Macross and Area 88? Yeah, I'm sold
Thanks for checking my profile out. Are you pointing these out because you think they run in contradiction to what I'm saying, or because you think I'm a poser?
If it's the former, you should've namedropped Princess Kaguya (you already did Rose of Versailles.)
And if it's the latter, you should've namedropped Ashita no Joe... because it's not like Dragon Ball is in my favorites or anything, lmao.
Deathko said:
Do yourself a favor and finish the Planetes manga. It's actually quite different from the anime, so at worst you're getting an alternative story. But I honestly think the anime can't hold a candle to it.
Do yourself a favor and finish the Planetes manga. It's actually quite different from the anime, so at worst you're getting an alternative story. But I honestly think the anime can't hold a candle to it.
It's written by that cuck Yukimura, sooooo that's gonna be a hard no from me.
| @Gentropy There's a few things to say about your hypothetical. - While it's not universal throughout history, incest is a near universal taboo for biological reasons. Incestuous intercourse to procreate should probably be discouraged to an extent. Incestuous marriages were common among some noble families (to avoid "dilluting the blood" or some crap like that), it did not go very well. Tho like most of your hypothetical, it's probably not a discussion we can have over MAL. Prohibiting incestuous reproductive sex does open the eugeism can of worms that is its whole philosophical debate. Believe it or not, I don't care if two grown-up brothers, sisters or cousins decide to make out and spend their lives together. - The subject of age and consent is probably a bit heavy and complex to tackle in a paraghraph on some anime forum (again), but while I generally disapprove hephebolia on principle, I've actually met people who had consensual sx with older people when they were young, and speak of their own experience in a positive light. It didn't make me upset or traumatize me. - The subject of authority/power is also something you need to consider. A father or mother figure has an autorithy on their children that random strangers who have consensual sex do not have on each other. Obviously consent is harder to evaluate in this situation. Your hypothetical is taboo in most places because of the potential harm it does to society or victims. Saying the same about consensual sex between adults is hardly reasonable. No nation has ever complained about extra-marital natality. Diddy drugging and raping teenagers =/= two consenting adults having sex. You're free to not like the latter, but equating it to the former just raises questions concerning the integrity of your moral compass. Gentropy said: "Because I can't look past my own experiences as a frame of reference." Pretty rich considering you just extended your own inability to go past your worldviews to everybody in the first post I answered. I didn't take the WW2 holocaust consipary bait the first time, what makes you think I'll take it the second time? (^: I'm not sure you realize, but atheism is not an organized religio- *googles it quickly* Oh lmfao, americans made atheist associations. Considering it's only a thing in the US, I'll take a guess and say it's an american problem rather than an atheism problem, especially since there's more atheists in Europe. I don't have any problems. I just gave you anecdotal evidence that I don't, you made fun of it. And I'm sure others do. Lovecraft is one of the most revered authors of the 20th century, people have largely discussed the omnipresent racism in his work, and that doesn't prevent tons of people who disagree with him from reading and enjoying his work. And his blatant atheism never prevented tons of believers from reading him either. The Overton window? How many international successes straight up ignored it? Since we're using "Diddy portrayed in a positive light" as an example, there's Nabokov's Lolita which is a controversial but major work of literature since its publication. I was just curious to find an anime that treats gender-bending seriously in your favs since that sounds like something you'de have problems with, but I can see the reasoning. Huh... I like baiting, but no, I just pointed your favs out because they're cool and I have them in my favs too. You're definitely missing out, but that's your choice :p |
DeathkoToday, 8:38 AM
Prophetess of the Golden Era |
Today, 9:47 AM
#61
| If you check Secret Santa, most common unwanted genres are ecchi, harem, BL and GL, so there you go. |
Today, 10:07 AM
#62
| Depends on the audience. Were I to recommend any anime to someone like my mother, it would be swiftly rejected. For more casual fans, who mostly watch stuff like One Piece, JJK, Demon Slayer, etc., anything 'too anime' is probably not a good idea. Tsumasho, Kakushigoto, hell even the Monogatari Series are 'too far' for a lot of people, and any sort of ecchi element may be grounds to call the recommender a pedophile. Me personally, if someone were to recommend something like a random-ass seasonal anime, I would be disappointed, even offended perhaps. Also Boku no Pico. I know what it is, and I've heard the joke countless times, so it gets annoying. |
More topics from this board
» 🍉 Summer 2025: OP/ ED of the Season ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )nirererin - Nov 21 |
493 |
by ProGoddess
»»
4 minutes ago |
|
» How the f*ck do Users tolerate digital shit with jitters, Judders, and Stutters without getting a headache? ( 1 2 3 4 )ColourWheel - Dec 16 |
174 |
by traed
»»
10 minutes ago |
|
» Anyone else noticed this? There's so much AI sourced animation and imagery in anime nowKinoHurter - Dec 16 |
30 |
by JayDaAnimeLord
»»
13 minutes ago |
|
» Why is elitism frowned upon? ( 1 2 )IdeDial - Dec 12 |
96 |
by Magpareddi
»»
28 minutes ago |
|
» Which anime Boys or Girls could win a fight (to knockout / near knockout) with only punching, kicking, submission holds, etc?~ (no handheld weapons)IpreferEcchi - 5 hours ago |
4 |
by KoharuBreeder
»»
32 minutes ago |
