New
Jan 17, 2018 11:38 PM
#151
mcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: but k-on is boring af and has really bland characters at least in the first seasonyhunata said: Faederwulf said: shanimebib said: Faederwulf said: KyoAni please stop. Give us some more Hyouka, Nichjou, or even some more K-ON. Basically the same as above. From the statistics I've been checking, KyoAni seems to always have a decent net income during each fiscal year (143 mil yen in 2013, 165 in 2014). Unfortunately whoever owns KyoAni puts profit before quality. I can't say Kyoto Animation has ever been one of the most incredible studios, but they've certainly taken a dip in quality. Dude, 90% of all entrepreneurs of a profit-seeking organisation will put profit before quality. Of the remaining 10%, 9% will put profit before quality so long as the the product does not actively harm its consumers. That's not a KyoAni thing. It's a business thing. I'm well aware of this, but it's a modern and greedy approach to business. History has known many eras where creators of entertainment put quality before profit. Mayuka said: Faederwulf said: shanimebib said: Faederwulf said: KyoAni please stop. Give us some more Hyouka, Nichjou, or even some more K-ON. Basically the same as above. From the statistics I've been checking, KyoAni seems to always have a decent net income during each fiscal year (143 mil yen in 2013, 165 in 2014). Unfortunately whoever owns KyoAni puts profit before quality. I can't say Kyoto Animation has ever been one of the most incredible studios, but they've certainly taken a dip in quality. free! is quality, what are you talking about? smh edit: this isn't sarcasm, i actually mean it. an anime about reaching your dreams with a dash of sports and with a loveable cast of characters. it's rare to have that especially with a huge fanbase that is fueling it's sequels and movies. i appreciate this series for how far they've come. It's just boys and fanservice. Even K-ON at least had a comfy atmosphere. It's something comfy to relax to while watching cute girls do cute things. Nobody watches moe anime for excitement and deep characters. |
Jan 18, 2018 8:24 AM
#152
Faederwulf said: and it so happens that cute boys doing cute things is nice too except free is much more than that, unlike k-on's first seasonmcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: yhunata said: Faederwulf said: shanimebib said: Faederwulf said: KyoAni please stop. Give us some more Hyouka, Nichjou, or even some more K-ON. Basically the same as above. From the statistics I've been checking, KyoAni seems to always have a decent net income during each fiscal year (143 mil yen in 2013, 165 in 2014). Unfortunately whoever owns KyoAni puts profit before quality. I can't say Kyoto Animation has ever been one of the most incredible studios, but they've certainly taken a dip in quality. Dude, 90% of all entrepreneurs of a profit-seeking organisation will put profit before quality. Of the remaining 10%, 9% will put profit before quality so long as the the product does not actively harm its consumers. That's not a KyoAni thing. It's a business thing. I'm well aware of this, but it's a modern and greedy approach to business. History has known many eras where creators of entertainment put quality before profit. Mayuka said: Faederwulf said: shanimebib said: Faederwulf said: KyoAni please stop. Give us some more Hyouka, Nichjou, or even some more K-ON. Basically the same as above. From the statistics I've been checking, KyoAni seems to always have a decent net income during each fiscal year (143 mil yen in 2013, 165 in 2014). Unfortunately whoever owns KyoAni puts profit before quality. I can't say Kyoto Animation has ever been one of the most incredible studios, but they've certainly taken a dip in quality. free! is quality, what are you talking about? smh edit: this isn't sarcasm, i actually mean it. an anime about reaching your dreams with a dash of sports and with a loveable cast of characters. it's rare to have that especially with a huge fanbase that is fueling it's sequels and movies. i appreciate this series for how far they've come. It's just boys and fanservice. Even K-ON at least had a comfy atmosphere. It's something comfy to relax to while watching cute girls do cute things. Nobody watches moe anime for excitement and deep characters. |
Jan 19, 2018 1:19 AM
#153
mcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: and it so happens that cute boys doing cute things is nice too except free is much more than that, unlike k-on's first seasonmcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: but k-on is boring af and has really bland characters at least in the first seasonyhunata said: Faederwulf said: shanimebib said: Faederwulf said: KyoAni please stop. Give us some more Hyouka, Nichjou, or even some more K-ON. Basically the same as above. From the statistics I've been checking, KyoAni seems to always have a decent net income during each fiscal year (143 mil yen in 2013, 165 in 2014). Unfortunately whoever owns KyoAni puts profit before quality. I can't say Kyoto Animation has ever been one of the most incredible studios, but they've certainly taken a dip in quality. Dude, 90% of all entrepreneurs of a profit-seeking organisation will put profit before quality. Of the remaining 10%, 9% will put profit before quality so long as the the product does not actively harm its consumers. That's not a KyoAni thing. It's a business thing. I'm well aware of this, but it's a modern and greedy approach to business. History has known many eras where creators of entertainment put quality before profit. Mayuka said: Faederwulf said: shanimebib said: Faederwulf said: KyoAni please stop. Give us some more Hyouka, Nichjou, or even some more K-ON. Basically the same as above. From the statistics I've been checking, KyoAni seems to always have a decent net income during each fiscal year (143 mil yen in 2013, 165 in 2014). Unfortunately whoever owns KyoAni puts profit before quality. I can't say Kyoto Animation has ever been one of the most incredible studios, but they've certainly taken a dip in quality. free! is quality, what are you talking about? smh edit: this isn't sarcasm, i actually mean it. an anime about reaching your dreams with a dash of sports and with a loveable cast of characters. it's rare to have that especially with a huge fanbase that is fueling it's sequels and movies. i appreciate this series for how far they've come. It's just boys and fanservice. Even K-ON at least had a comfy atmosphere. It's something comfy to relax to while watching cute girls do cute things. Nobody watches moe anime for excitement and deep characters. It doesn't have the same comfy atmosphere as K-ON. How is free "so much more than that"? KyoAni hasn't made anything that could be described with those words in a long time. |
Jan 19, 2018 8:41 AM
#154
Faederwulf said: Because it's not just cute boys doing cute things, it's about genuine friendship and finding out what your dreams are, who you are and basically coming of age. Also the characters personalities actually aren't one dimensional.mcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: mcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: but k-on is boring af and has really bland characters at least in the first seasonyhunata said: Faederwulf said: shanimebib said: Faederwulf said: KyoAni please stop. Give us some more Hyouka, Nichjou, or even some more K-ON. Basically the same as above. From the statistics I've been checking, KyoAni seems to always have a decent net income during each fiscal year (143 mil yen in 2013, 165 in 2014). Unfortunately whoever owns KyoAni puts profit before quality. I can't say Kyoto Animation has ever been one of the most incredible studios, but they've certainly taken a dip in quality. Dude, 90% of all entrepreneurs of a profit-seeking organisation will put profit before quality. Of the remaining 10%, 9% will put profit before quality so long as the the product does not actively harm its consumers. That's not a KyoAni thing. It's a business thing. I'm well aware of this, but it's a modern and greedy approach to business. History has known many eras where creators of entertainment put quality before profit. Mayuka said: Faederwulf said: shanimebib said: Faederwulf said: KyoAni please stop. Give us some more Hyouka, Nichjou, or even some more K-ON. Basically the same as above. From the statistics I've been checking, KyoAni seems to always have a decent net income during each fiscal year (143 mil yen in 2013, 165 in 2014). Unfortunately whoever owns KyoAni puts profit before quality. I can't say Kyoto Animation has ever been one of the most incredible studios, but they've certainly taken a dip in quality. free! is quality, what are you talking about? smh edit: this isn't sarcasm, i actually mean it. an anime about reaching your dreams with a dash of sports and with a loveable cast of characters. it's rare to have that especially with a huge fanbase that is fueling it's sequels and movies. i appreciate this series for how far they've come. It's just boys and fanservice. Even K-ON at least had a comfy atmosphere. It's something comfy to relax to while watching cute girls do cute things. Nobody watches moe anime for excitement and deep characters. It doesn't have the same comfy atmosphere as K-ON. How is free "so much more than that"? KyoAni hasn't made anything that could be described with those words in a long time. |
Jan 19, 2018 4:44 PM
#155
mcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: Because it's not just cute boys doing cute things, it's about genuine friendship and finding out what your dreams are, who you are and basically coming of age. Also the characters personalities actually aren't one dimensional.mcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: and it so happens that cute boys doing cute things is nice too except free is much more than that, unlike k-on's first seasonmcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: but k-on is boring af and has really bland characters at least in the first seasonyhunata said: Faederwulf said: shanimebib said: Faederwulf said: KyoAni please stop. Give us some more Hyouka, Nichjou, or even some more K-ON. Basically the same as above. From the statistics I've been checking, KyoAni seems to always have a decent net income during each fiscal year (143 mil yen in 2013, 165 in 2014). Unfortunately whoever owns KyoAni puts profit before quality. I can't say Kyoto Animation has ever been one of the most incredible studios, but they've certainly taken a dip in quality. Dude, 90% of all entrepreneurs of a profit-seeking organisation will put profit before quality. Of the remaining 10%, 9% will put profit before quality so long as the the product does not actively harm its consumers. That's not a KyoAni thing. It's a business thing. I'm well aware of this, but it's a modern and greedy approach to business. History has known many eras where creators of entertainment put quality before profit. Mayuka said: Faederwulf said: shanimebib said: Faederwulf said: KyoAni please stop. Give us some more Hyouka, Nichjou, or even some more K-ON. Basically the same as above. From the statistics I've been checking, KyoAni seems to always have a decent net income during each fiscal year (143 mil yen in 2013, 165 in 2014). Unfortunately whoever owns KyoAni puts profit before quality. I can't say Kyoto Animation has ever been one of the most incredible studios, but they've certainly taken a dip in quality. free! is quality, what are you talking about? smh edit: this isn't sarcasm, i actually mean it. an anime about reaching your dreams with a dash of sports and with a loveable cast of characters. it's rare to have that especially with a huge fanbase that is fueling it's sequels and movies. i appreciate this series for how far they've come. It's just boys and fanservice. Even K-ON at least had a comfy atmosphere. It's something comfy to relax to while watching cute girls do cute things. Nobody watches moe anime for excitement and deep characters. It doesn't have the same comfy atmosphere as K-ON. How is free "so much more than that"? KyoAni hasn't made anything that could be described with those words in a long time. That's the meaning of corny, generic, and one dimensional. |
Jan 19, 2018 4:47 PM
#156
Faederwulf said: You haven't even watched it lmao so you might as well stop replying to memcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: mcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: and it so happens that cute boys doing cute things is nice too except free is much more than that, unlike k-on's first seasonmcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: but k-on is boring af and has really bland characters at least in the first seasonyhunata said: Faederwulf said: shanimebib said: Faederwulf said: KyoAni please stop. Give us some more Hyouka, Nichjou, or even some more K-ON. Basically the same as above. From the statistics I've been checking, KyoAni seems to always have a decent net income during each fiscal year (143 mil yen in 2013, 165 in 2014). Unfortunately whoever owns KyoAni puts profit before quality. I can't say Kyoto Animation has ever been one of the most incredible studios, but they've certainly taken a dip in quality. Dude, 90% of all entrepreneurs of a profit-seeking organisation will put profit before quality. Of the remaining 10%, 9% will put profit before quality so long as the the product does not actively harm its consumers. That's not a KyoAni thing. It's a business thing. I'm well aware of this, but it's a modern and greedy approach to business. History has known many eras where creators of entertainment put quality before profit. Mayuka said: Faederwulf said: shanimebib said: Faederwulf said: KyoAni please stop. Give us some more Hyouka, Nichjou, or even some more K-ON. Basically the same as above. From the statistics I've been checking, KyoAni seems to always have a decent net income during each fiscal year (143 mil yen in 2013, 165 in 2014). Unfortunately whoever owns KyoAni puts profit before quality. I can't say Kyoto Animation has ever been one of the most incredible studios, but they've certainly taken a dip in quality. free! is quality, what are you talking about? smh edit: this isn't sarcasm, i actually mean it. an anime about reaching your dreams with a dash of sports and with a loveable cast of characters. it's rare to have that especially with a huge fanbase that is fueling it's sequels and movies. i appreciate this series for how far they've come. It's just boys and fanservice. Even K-ON at least had a comfy atmosphere. It's something comfy to relax to while watching cute girls do cute things. Nobody watches moe anime for excitement and deep characters. It doesn't have the same comfy atmosphere as K-ON. How is free "so much more than that"? KyoAni hasn't made anything that could be described with those words in a long time. That's the meaning of corny, generic, and one dimensional. |
Jan 19, 2018 5:20 PM
#157
mcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: You haven't even watched it lmao so you might as well stop replying to memcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: Because it's not just cute boys doing cute things, it's about genuine friendship and finding out what your dreams are, who you are and basically coming of age. Also the characters personalities actually aren't one dimensional.mcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: and it so happens that cute boys doing cute things is nice too except free is much more than that, unlike k-on's first seasonmcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: but k-on is boring af and has really bland characters at least in the first seasonyhunata said: Faederwulf said: shanimebib said: Faederwulf said: KyoAni please stop. Give us some more Hyouka, Nichjou, or even some more K-ON. Basically the same as above. From the statistics I've been checking, KyoAni seems to always have a decent net income during each fiscal year (143 mil yen in 2013, 165 in 2014). Unfortunately whoever owns KyoAni puts profit before quality. I can't say Kyoto Animation has ever been one of the most incredible studios, but they've certainly taken a dip in quality. Dude, 90% of all entrepreneurs of a profit-seeking organisation will put profit before quality. Of the remaining 10%, 9% will put profit before quality so long as the the product does not actively harm its consumers. That's not a KyoAni thing. It's a business thing. I'm well aware of this, but it's a modern and greedy approach to business. History has known many eras where creators of entertainment put quality before profit. Mayuka said: Faederwulf said: shanimebib said: Faederwulf said: KyoAni please stop. Give us some more Hyouka, Nichjou, or even some more K-ON. Basically the same as above. From the statistics I've been checking, KyoAni seems to always have a decent net income during each fiscal year (143 mil yen in 2013, 165 in 2014). Unfortunately whoever owns KyoAni puts profit before quality. I can't say Kyoto Animation has ever been one of the most incredible studios, but they've certainly taken a dip in quality. free! is quality, what are you talking about? smh edit: this isn't sarcasm, i actually mean it. an anime about reaching your dreams with a dash of sports and with a loveable cast of characters. it's rare to have that especially with a huge fanbase that is fueling it's sequels and movies. i appreciate this series for how far they've come. It's just boys and fanservice. Even K-ON at least had a comfy atmosphere. It's something comfy to relax to while watching cute girls do cute things. Nobody watches moe anime for excitement and deep characters. It doesn't have the same comfy atmosphere as K-ON. How is free "so much more than that"? KyoAni hasn't made anything that could be described with those words in a long time. That's the meaning of corny, generic, and one dimensional. I've watched enough of it to know that it's bad. Also, you were the one who replied to my 3 month old post. Anyway, it's a KyoAni moe show, none of them are anything special (including K-ON). |
Jan 20, 2018 2:56 AM
#158
Faederwulf said: ok now that made me realise you're pretty stupid and there was no point replying to you lmaomcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: mcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: Because it's not just cute boys doing cute things, it's about genuine friendship and finding out what your dreams are, who you are and basically coming of age. Also the characters personalities actually aren't one dimensional.mcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: and it so happens that cute boys doing cute things is nice too except free is much more than that, unlike k-on's first seasonmcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: but k-on is boring af and has really bland characters at least in the first seasonyhunata said: Faederwulf said: shanimebib said: Faederwulf said: KyoAni please stop. Give us some more Hyouka, Nichjou, or even some more K-ON. Basically the same as above. From the statistics I've been checking, KyoAni seems to always have a decent net income during each fiscal year (143 mil yen in 2013, 165 in 2014). Unfortunately whoever owns KyoAni puts profit before quality. I can't say Kyoto Animation has ever been one of the most incredible studios, but they've certainly taken a dip in quality. Dude, 90% of all entrepreneurs of a profit-seeking organisation will put profit before quality. Of the remaining 10%, 9% will put profit before quality so long as the the product does not actively harm its consumers. That's not a KyoAni thing. It's a business thing. I'm well aware of this, but it's a modern and greedy approach to business. History has known many eras where creators of entertainment put quality before profit. Mayuka said: Faederwulf said: shanimebib said: Faederwulf said: KyoAni please stop. Give us some more Hyouka, Nichjou, or even some more K-ON. Basically the same as above. From the statistics I've been checking, KyoAni seems to always have a decent net income during each fiscal year (143 mil yen in 2013, 165 in 2014). Unfortunately whoever owns KyoAni puts profit before quality. I can't say Kyoto Animation has ever been one of the most incredible studios, but they've certainly taken a dip in quality. free! is quality, what are you talking about? smh edit: this isn't sarcasm, i actually mean it. an anime about reaching your dreams with a dash of sports and with a loveable cast of characters. it's rare to have that especially with a huge fanbase that is fueling it's sequels and movies. i appreciate this series for how far they've come. It's just boys and fanservice. Even K-ON at least had a comfy atmosphere. It's something comfy to relax to while watching cute girls do cute things. Nobody watches moe anime for excitement and deep characters. It doesn't have the same comfy atmosphere as K-ON. How is free "so much more than that"? KyoAni hasn't made anything that could be described with those words in a long time. That's the meaning of corny, generic, and one dimensional. I've watched enough of it to know that it's bad. Also, you were the one who replied to my 3 month old post. Anyway, it's a KyoAni moe show, none of them are anything special (including K-ON). |
Jan 20, 2018 3:48 PM
#159
mcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: ok now that made me realise you're pretty stupid and there was no point replying to you lmaomcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: You haven't even watched it lmao so you might as well stop replying to memcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: Because it's not just cute boys doing cute things, it's about genuine friendship and finding out what your dreams are, who you are and basically coming of age. Also the characters personalities actually aren't one dimensional.mcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: and it so happens that cute boys doing cute things is nice too except free is much more than that, unlike k-on's first seasonmcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: but k-on is boring af and has really bland characters at least in the first seasonyhunata said: Faederwulf said: shanimebib said: Faederwulf said: KyoAni please stop. Give us some more Hyouka, Nichjou, or even some more K-ON. Basically the same as above. From the statistics I've been checking, KyoAni seems to always have a decent net income during each fiscal year (143 mil yen in 2013, 165 in 2014). Unfortunately whoever owns KyoAni puts profit before quality. I can't say Kyoto Animation has ever been one of the most incredible studios, but they've certainly taken a dip in quality. Dude, 90% of all entrepreneurs of a profit-seeking organisation will put profit before quality. Of the remaining 10%, 9% will put profit before quality so long as the the product does not actively harm its consumers. That's not a KyoAni thing. It's a business thing. I'm well aware of this, but it's a modern and greedy approach to business. History has known many eras where creators of entertainment put quality before profit. Mayuka said: Faederwulf said: shanimebib said: Faederwulf said: KyoAni please stop. Give us some more Hyouka, Nichjou, or even some more K-ON. Basically the same as above. From the statistics I've been checking, KyoAni seems to always have a decent net income during each fiscal year (143 mil yen in 2013, 165 in 2014). Unfortunately whoever owns KyoAni puts profit before quality. I can't say Kyoto Animation has ever been one of the most incredible studios, but they've certainly taken a dip in quality. free! is quality, what are you talking about? smh edit: this isn't sarcasm, i actually mean it. an anime about reaching your dreams with a dash of sports and with a loveable cast of characters. it's rare to have that especially with a huge fanbase that is fueling it's sequels and movies. i appreciate this series for how far they've come. It's just boys and fanservice. Even K-ON at least had a comfy atmosphere. It's something comfy to relax to while watching cute girls do cute things. Nobody watches moe anime for excitement and deep characters. It doesn't have the same comfy atmosphere as K-ON. How is free "so much more than that"? KyoAni hasn't made anything that could be described with those words in a long time. That's the meaning of corny, generic, and one dimensional. I've watched enough of it to know that it's bad. Also, you were the one who replied to my 3 month old post. Anyway, it's a KyoAni moe show, none of them are anything special (including K-ON). Great way to reply when you have no argument. |
Jan 21, 2018 4:19 AM
#160
Faederwulf said: Indeed bc: watching only scenes from shows and saying they're bad = actual retardationmcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: mcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: You haven't even watched it lmao so you might as well stop replying to memcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: Because it's not just cute boys doing cute things, it's about genuine friendship and finding out what your dreams are, who you are and basically coming of age. Also the characters personalities actually aren't one dimensional.mcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: and it so happens that cute boys doing cute things is nice too except free is much more than that, unlike k-on's first seasonmcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: but k-on is boring af and has really bland characters at least in the first seasonyhunata said: Faederwulf said: shanimebib said: Faederwulf said: KyoAni please stop. Give us some more Hyouka, Nichjou, or even some more K-ON. Basically the same as above. From the statistics I've been checking, KyoAni seems to always have a decent net income during each fiscal year (143 mil yen in 2013, 165 in 2014). Unfortunately whoever owns KyoAni puts profit before quality. I can't say Kyoto Animation has ever been one of the most incredible studios, but they've certainly taken a dip in quality. Dude, 90% of all entrepreneurs of a profit-seeking organisation will put profit before quality. Of the remaining 10%, 9% will put profit before quality so long as the the product does not actively harm its consumers. That's not a KyoAni thing. It's a business thing. I'm well aware of this, but it's a modern and greedy approach to business. History has known many eras where creators of entertainment put quality before profit. Mayuka said: Faederwulf said: shanimebib said: Faederwulf said: KyoAni please stop. Give us some more Hyouka, Nichjou, or even some more K-ON. Basically the same as above. From the statistics I've been checking, KyoAni seems to always have a decent net income during each fiscal year (143 mil yen in 2013, 165 in 2014). Unfortunately whoever owns KyoAni puts profit before quality. I can't say Kyoto Animation has ever been one of the most incredible studios, but they've certainly taken a dip in quality. free! is quality, what are you talking about? smh edit: this isn't sarcasm, i actually mean it. an anime about reaching your dreams with a dash of sports and with a loveable cast of characters. it's rare to have that especially with a huge fanbase that is fueling it's sequels and movies. i appreciate this series for how far they've come. It's just boys and fanservice. Even K-ON at least had a comfy atmosphere. It's something comfy to relax to while watching cute girls do cute things. Nobody watches moe anime for excitement and deep characters. It doesn't have the same comfy atmosphere as K-ON. How is free "so much more than that"? KyoAni hasn't made anything that could be described with those words in a long time. That's the meaning of corny, generic, and one dimensional. I've watched enough of it to know that it's bad. Also, you were the one who replied to my 3 month old post. Anyway, it's a KyoAni moe show, none of them are anything special (including K-ON). Great way to reply when you have no argument. |
Jan 21, 2018 4:06 PM
#161
mcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: Indeed bc: watching only scenes from shows and saying they're bad = actual retardationmcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: ok now that made me realise you're pretty stupid and there was no point replying to you lmaomcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: You haven't even watched it lmao so you might as well stop replying to memcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: Because it's not just cute boys doing cute things, it's about genuine friendship and finding out what your dreams are, who you are and basically coming of age. Also the characters personalities actually aren't one dimensional.mcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: and it so happens that cute boys doing cute things is nice too except free is much more than that, unlike k-on's first seasonmcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: but k-on is boring af and has really bland characters at least in the first seasonyhunata said: Faederwulf said: shanimebib said: Faederwulf said: KyoAni please stop. Give us some more Hyouka, Nichjou, or even some more K-ON. Basically the same as above. From the statistics I've been checking, KyoAni seems to always have a decent net income during each fiscal year (143 mil yen in 2013, 165 in 2014). Unfortunately whoever owns KyoAni puts profit before quality. I can't say Kyoto Animation has ever been one of the most incredible studios, but they've certainly taken a dip in quality. Dude, 90% of all entrepreneurs of a profit-seeking organisation will put profit before quality. Of the remaining 10%, 9% will put profit before quality so long as the the product does not actively harm its consumers. That's not a KyoAni thing. It's a business thing. I'm well aware of this, but it's a modern and greedy approach to business. History has known many eras where creators of entertainment put quality before profit. Mayuka said: Faederwulf said: shanimebib said: Faederwulf said: KyoAni please stop. Give us some more Hyouka, Nichjou, or even some more K-ON. Basically the same as above. From the statistics I've been checking, KyoAni seems to always have a decent net income during each fiscal year (143 mil yen in 2013, 165 in 2014). Unfortunately whoever owns KyoAni puts profit before quality. I can't say Kyoto Animation has ever been one of the most incredible studios, but they've certainly taken a dip in quality. free! is quality, what are you talking about? smh edit: this isn't sarcasm, i actually mean it. an anime about reaching your dreams with a dash of sports and with a loveable cast of characters. it's rare to have that especially with a huge fanbase that is fueling it's sequels and movies. i appreciate this series for how far they've come. It's just boys and fanservice. Even K-ON at least had a comfy atmosphere. It's something comfy to relax to while watching cute girls do cute things. Nobody watches moe anime for excitement and deep characters. It doesn't have the same comfy atmosphere as K-ON. How is free "so much more than that"? KyoAni hasn't made anything that could be described with those words in a long time. That's the meaning of corny, generic, and one dimensional. I've watched enough of it to know that it's bad. Also, you were the one who replied to my 3 month old post. Anyway, it's a KyoAni moe show, none of them are anything special (including K-ON). Great way to reply when you have no argument. Shows are made up of scenes, just as a life is made up of deeds. Should someone who rapes and murders a child not be judged by that deed? Should they be seen as a good person so long as the rest of their life was clean? Of course not. Anyway, as a straight man I'm obviously not interested in a male fanservice compilation. I'm very familiar with the KyoAni formula - ever since they shifted their focus to moe, their shows have never been truly good. Pretending as if free is anything more than attractive guys swimming is like pretending K-ON is anything more than cute girls eating cake and drinking tea (and sometimes playing music). |
removed-userJan 21, 2018 4:10 PM
Jan 22, 2018 2:40 PM
#162
Faederwulf said: so would you say monogatari series is shit bc of the toothbrush and pedo and incest scenes???mcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: mcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: ok now that made me realise you're pretty stupid and there was no point replying to you lmaomcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: You haven't even watched it lmao so you might as well stop replying to memcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: Because it's not just cute boys doing cute things, it's about genuine friendship and finding out what your dreams are, who you are and basically coming of age. Also the characters personalities actually aren't one dimensional.mcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: and it so happens that cute boys doing cute things is nice too except free is much more than that, unlike k-on's first seasonmcrta_weeb said: Faederwulf said: but k-on is boring af and has really bland characters at least in the first seasonyhunata said: Faederwulf said: shanimebib said: Faederwulf said: KyoAni please stop. Give us some more Hyouka, Nichjou, or even some more K-ON. Basically the same as above. From the statistics I've been checking, KyoAni seems to always have a decent net income during each fiscal year (143 mil yen in 2013, 165 in 2014). Unfortunately whoever owns KyoAni puts profit before quality. I can't say Kyoto Animation has ever been one of the most incredible studios, but they've certainly taken a dip in quality. Dude, 90% of all entrepreneurs of a profit-seeking organisation will put profit before quality. Of the remaining 10%, 9% will put profit before quality so long as the the product does not actively harm its consumers. That's not a KyoAni thing. It's a business thing. I'm well aware of this, but it's a modern and greedy approach to business. History has known many eras where creators of entertainment put quality before profit. Mayuka said: Faederwulf said: shanimebib said: Faederwulf said: KyoAni please stop. Give us some more Hyouka, Nichjou, or even some more K-ON. Basically the same as above. From the statistics I've been checking, KyoAni seems to always have a decent net income during each fiscal year (143 mil yen in 2013, 165 in 2014). Unfortunately whoever owns KyoAni puts profit before quality. I can't say Kyoto Animation has ever been one of the most incredible studios, but they've certainly taken a dip in quality. free! is quality, what are you talking about? smh edit: this isn't sarcasm, i actually mean it. an anime about reaching your dreams with a dash of sports and with a loveable cast of characters. it's rare to have that especially with a huge fanbase that is fueling it's sequels and movies. i appreciate this series for how far they've come. It's just boys and fanservice. Even K-ON at least had a comfy atmosphere. It's something comfy to relax to while watching cute girls do cute things. Nobody watches moe anime for excitement and deep characters. It doesn't have the same comfy atmosphere as K-ON. How is free "so much more than that"? KyoAni hasn't made anything that could be described with those words in a long time. That's the meaning of corny, generic, and one dimensional. I've watched enough of it to know that it's bad. Also, you were the one who replied to my 3 month old post. Anyway, it's a KyoAni moe show, none of them are anything special (including K-ON). Great way to reply when you have no argument. Shows are made up of scenes, just as a life is made up of deeds. Should someone who rapes and murders a child not be judged by that deed? Should they be seen as a good person so long as the rest of their life was clean? Of course not. Anyway, as a straight man I'm obviously not interested in a male fanservice compilation. I'm very familiar with the KyoAni formula - ever since they shifted their focus to moe, their shows have never been truly good. Pretending as if free is anything more than attractive guys swimming is like pretending K-ON is anything more than cute girls eating cake and drinking tea (and sometimes playing music). |
Feb 16, 2018 5:53 AM
#163
All I need is a brand new ED that will blow my mind. <like the 1st and the 2nd> |
"Please stop talking about math when I'm eating." |
More topics from this board
» Manga 'Toumei Otoko to Ningen Onna: Sonouchi Fuufu ni Naru Futari' Gets TV Anime in 2025Nioxys - Yesterday |
4 |
by VivavideoUser2x
»»
51 minutes ago |
|
» 'Yuusha Party wo Tsuihou sareta Shiromadoushi, S-Rank Boukensha ni Hirowareru: Kono Shiromadoushi ga Kikakugai Sugiru' Announces Main StaffNioxys - Yesterday |
2 |
by CocoaGalaxy
»»
5 hours ago |
|
» 'Binan Koukou Chikyuu Bouei-bu Eternal Love!' Announces Additional Cast PairVindstot - Yesterday |
0 |
by Vindstot
»»
Yesterday, 5:12 PM |
|
» 'Hikaru ga Shinda Natsu' Reveals Main Cast, Staff, Teaser for Summer 2025Vindstot - Nov 26 |
16 |
by saeran_choiiii
»»
Yesterday, 4:58 PM |
|
» 'Class no Daikirai na Joshi to Kekkon suru Koto ni Natta.' Reveals Additional Staff, Second PromoDatRandomDude - Yesterday |
0 |
by DatRandomDude
»»
Yesterday, 3:56 PM |