New
What did you think of this chapter?
DO NOT discuss the source material beyond this chapter. If you want to discuss future events, please use separate threads.
DO NOT ask where to read/download this chapter or give links to copyrighted, non-fair use material.
DO NOT troll/bait/harass/abuse other users for liking or disliking the series/characters.
DO read the Manga Discussion Rules and Site & Forum Guidelines.
DO NOT ask where to read/download this chapter or give links to copyrighted, non-fair use material.
DO NOT troll/bait/harass/abuse other users for liking or disliking the series/characters.
DO read the Manga Discussion Rules and Site & Forum Guidelines.
Jun 20, 10:27 AM
#1
| I was planning to start from the original but that seems to be very difficult to find. So here are my first impressions on Princess knight first chapter "Once upon a Time" Not much happens on this first episode that we aren't aware by the synopsis. It did surprise me that a manga from the fifties used the word misogyny, i know it shouldn't the treatment of gender issues is one on the reasons I'm reading this but I remember reading mangas from the 90's and 2000's than didn't want to called things by their names, it could be because the translation it's from 2011 and that wasn't a problem japan had but us. However it was a pleasant surprise non the less. The style/vibe besides being very clearly Tezuka's, makes a great job at giving the sensation of it being a fairy-tale or a Disney princess movie. Funny thing I notice besides the colours "human" Tink is dress exactly as the Argentinian character Pantriste or at least very similar. Overall, nothing but good things in this chapter, for me at least. I curious to see where the story goes. |
Jun 20, 11:05 AM
#2
JuliSun_Moon said: I was planning to start from the original but that seems to be very difficult to find. So here are my first impressions on Princess knight first chapter "Once upon a Time" Not much happens on this first episode that we aren't aware by the synopsis. It did surprise me that a manga from the fifties used the word misogyny, i know it shouldn't the treatment of gender issues is one on the reasons I'm reading this but I remember reading mangas from the 90's and 2000's than didn't want to called things by their names, it could be because the translation it's from 2011 and that wasn't a problem japan had but us. However it was a pleasant surprise non the less. The style/vibe besides being very clearly Tezuka's, makes a great job at giving the sensation of it being a fairy-tale or a Disney princess movie. Funny thing I notice besides the colours "human" Tink is dress exactly as the Argentinian character Pantriste or at least very similar. Overall, nothing but good things in this chapter, for me at least. I curious to see where the story goes. apparently they are the same story but expanded same as with other Tezuka works the newer editions either have more stuff expanded on or just art imorovement but overall they're the same |
Jun 20, 11:14 AM
#3
Reply to Red3103
JuliSun_Moon said:
I was planning to start from the original but that seems to be very difficult to find. So here are my first impressions on Princess knight first chapter "Once upon a Time"
Not much happens on this first episode that we aren't aware by the synopsis. It did surprise me that a manga from the fifties used the word misogyny, i know it shouldn't the treatment of gender issues is one on the reasons I'm reading this but I remember reading mangas from the 90's and 2000's than didn't want to called things by their names, it could be because the translation it's from 2011 and that wasn't a problem japan had but us. However it was a pleasant surprise non the less.
The style/vibe besides being very clearly Tezuka's, makes a great job at giving the sensation of it being a fairy-tale or a Disney princess movie.
Funny thing I notice besides the colours "human" Tink is dress exactly as the Argentinian character Pantriste or at least very similar.
Overall, nothing but good things in this chapter, for me at least. I curious to see where the story goes.
I was planning to start from the original but that seems to be very difficult to find. So here are my first impressions on Princess knight first chapter "Once upon a Time"
Not much happens on this first episode that we aren't aware by the synopsis. It did surprise me that a manga from the fifties used the word misogyny, i know it shouldn't the treatment of gender issues is one on the reasons I'm reading this but I remember reading mangas from the 90's and 2000's than didn't want to called things by their names, it could be because the translation it's from 2011 and that wasn't a problem japan had but us. However it was a pleasant surprise non the less.
The style/vibe besides being very clearly Tezuka's, makes a great job at giving the sensation of it being a fairy-tale or a Disney princess movie.
Funny thing I notice besides the colours "human" Tink is dress exactly as the Argentinian character Pantriste or at least very similar.
Overall, nothing but good things in this chapter, for me at least. I curious to see where the story goes.
apparently they are the same story but expanded same as with other Tezuka works the newer editions either have more stuff expanded on or just art imorovement but overall they're the same
| @Red3103 yes, but I am (or at least I try to be) a bit of a completionist, so my ideal form of expiriencing media is to do it fully and in order. That isn't always posible and I'm okay with that. However I did wish it was a little eisier to find |
Jun 20, 12:05 PM
#4
Red3103 said: JuliSun_Moon said: I was planning to start from the original but that seems to be very difficult to find. So here are my first impressions on Princess knight first chapter "Once upon a Time" Not much happens on this first episode that we aren't aware by the synopsis. It did surprise me that a manga from the fifties used the word misogyny, i know it shouldn't the treatment of gender issues is one on the reasons I'm reading this but I remember reading mangas from the 90's and 2000's than didn't want to called things by their names, it could be because the translation it's from 2011 and that wasn't a problem japan had but us. However it was a pleasant surprise non the less. The style/vibe besides being very clearly Tezuka's, makes a great job at giving the sensation of it being a fairy-tale or a Disney princess movie. Funny thing I notice besides the colours "human" Tink is dress exactly as the Argentinian character Pantriste or at least very similar. Overall, nothing but good things in this chapter, for me at least. I curious to see where the story goes. apparently they are the same story but expanded same as with other Tezuka works the newer editions either have more stuff expanded on or just art imorovement but overall they're the same It can't really be called the same story when the newer is drawn/presented compleatly differently, only the main premise is the same but most of the events are different. Revising art/scenes for old manga is different from reserialization. Tezuka grew a lot in 10 years as an manga artist. To note: Twin Knight is a sequel to 53 version, but it doesn't really fit as a sequel to the 63 version do to the changes in the cast of characters. |
Jun 20, 12:30 PM
#5
AndroidLB said: Red3103 said: JuliSun_Moon said: I was planning to start from the original but that seems to be very difficult to find. So here are my first impressions on Princess knight first chapter "Once upon a Time" Not much happens on this first episode that we aren't aware by the synopsis. It did surprise me that a manga from the fifties used the word misogyny, i know it shouldn't the treatment of gender issues is one on the reasons I'm reading this but I remember reading mangas from the 90's and 2000's than didn't want to called things by their names, it could be because the translation it's from 2011 and that wasn't a problem japan had but us. However it was a pleasant surprise non the less. The style/vibe besides being very clearly Tezuka's, makes a great job at giving the sensation of it being a fairy-tale or a Disney princess movie. Funny thing I notice besides the colours "human" Tink is dress exactly as the Argentinian character Pantriste or at least very similar. Overall, nothing but good things in this chapter, for me at least. I curious to see where the story goes. apparently they are the same story but expanded same as with other Tezuka works the newer editions either have more stuff expanded on or just art imorovement but overall they're the same It can't really be called the same story when the newer is drawn/presented compleatly differently, only the main premise is the same but most of the events are different. Revising art/scenes for old manga is different from reserialization. Tezuka grew a lot in 10 years as an manga artist. To note: Twin Knight is a sequel to 53 version, but it doesn't really fit as a sequel to the 63 version do to the changes in the cast of characters. it literally says it's a rehash in its afterword of the 53 version only main difference is the witch replacement and Capt.Blood |
Jun 20, 12:42 PM
#6
Reply to AndroidLB
Red3103 said:
apparently they are the same story but expanded same as with other Tezuka works the newer editions either have more stuff expanded on or just art imorovement but overall they're the same
JuliSun_Moon said:
I was planning to start from the original but that seems to be very difficult to find. So here are my first impressions on Princess knight first chapter "Once upon a Time"
Not much happens on this first episode that we aren't aware by the synopsis. It did surprise me that a manga from the fifties used the word misogyny, i know it shouldn't the treatment of gender issues is one on the reasons I'm reading this but I remember reading mangas from the 90's and 2000's than didn't want to called things by their names, it could be because the translation it's from 2011 and that wasn't a problem japan had but us. However it was a pleasant surprise non the less.
The style/vibe besides being very clearly Tezuka's, makes a great job at giving the sensation of it being a fairy-tale or a Disney princess movie.
Funny thing I notice besides the colours "human" Tink is dress exactly as the Argentinian character Pantriste or at least very similar.
Overall, nothing but good things in this chapter, for me at least. I curious to see where the story goes.
I was planning to start from the original but that seems to be very difficult to find. So here are my first impressions on Princess knight first chapter "Once upon a Time"
Not much happens on this first episode that we aren't aware by the synopsis. It did surprise me that a manga from the fifties used the word misogyny, i know it shouldn't the treatment of gender issues is one on the reasons I'm reading this but I remember reading mangas from the 90's and 2000's than didn't want to called things by their names, it could be because the translation it's from 2011 and that wasn't a problem japan had but us. However it was a pleasant surprise non the less.
The style/vibe besides being very clearly Tezuka's, makes a great job at giving the sensation of it being a fairy-tale or a Disney princess movie.
Funny thing I notice besides the colours "human" Tink is dress exactly as the Argentinian character Pantriste or at least very similar.
Overall, nothing but good things in this chapter, for me at least. I curious to see where the story goes.
apparently they are the same story but expanded same as with other Tezuka works the newer editions either have more stuff expanded on or just art imorovement but overall they're the same
It can't really be called the same story when the newer is drawn/presented compleatly differently, only the main premise is the same but most of the events are different. Revising art/scenes for old manga is different from reserialization. Tezuka grew a lot in 10 years as an manga artist.
To note: Twin Knight is a sequel to 53 version, but it doesn't really fit as a sequel to the 63 version do to the changes in the cast of characters.
| @AndroidLB yeah I heard there were story differences and sapphire looks completly different however I can't find it. I did found some scans but only i japanese websites and I don't know which chapter they belong to |
Jun 20, 12:43 PM
#7
Reply to AndroidLB
Red3103 said:
apparently they are the same story but expanded same as with other Tezuka works the newer editions either have more stuff expanded on or just art imorovement but overall they're the same
JuliSun_Moon said:
I was planning to start from the original but that seems to be very difficult to find. So here are my first impressions on Princess knight first chapter "Once upon a Time"
Not much happens on this first episode that we aren't aware by the synopsis. It did surprise me that a manga from the fifties used the word misogyny, i know it shouldn't the treatment of gender issues is one on the reasons I'm reading this but I remember reading mangas from the 90's and 2000's than didn't want to called things by their names, it could be because the translation it's from 2011 and that wasn't a problem japan had but us. However it was a pleasant surprise non the less.
The style/vibe besides being very clearly Tezuka's, makes a great job at giving the sensation of it being a fairy-tale or a Disney princess movie.
Funny thing I notice besides the colours "human" Tink is dress exactly as the Argentinian character Pantriste or at least very similar.
Overall, nothing but good things in this chapter, for me at least. I curious to see where the story goes.
I was planning to start from the original but that seems to be very difficult to find. So here are my first impressions on Princess knight first chapter "Once upon a Time"
Not much happens on this first episode that we aren't aware by the synopsis. It did surprise me that a manga from the fifties used the word misogyny, i know it shouldn't the treatment of gender issues is one on the reasons I'm reading this but I remember reading mangas from the 90's and 2000's than didn't want to called things by their names, it could be because the translation it's from 2011 and that wasn't a problem japan had but us. However it was a pleasant surprise non the less.
The style/vibe besides being very clearly Tezuka's, makes a great job at giving the sensation of it being a fairy-tale or a Disney princess movie.
Funny thing I notice besides the colours "human" Tink is dress exactly as the Argentinian character Pantriste or at least very similar.
Overall, nothing but good things in this chapter, for me at least. I curious to see where the story goes.
apparently they are the same story but expanded same as with other Tezuka works the newer editions either have more stuff expanded on or just art imorovement but overall they're the same
It can't really be called the same story when the newer is drawn/presented compleatly differently, only the main premise is the same but most of the events are different. Revising art/scenes for old manga is different from reserialization. Tezuka grew a lot in 10 years as an manga artist.
To note: Twin Knight is a sequel to 53 version, but it doesn't really fit as a sequel to the 63 version do to the changes in the cast of characters.
| @AndroidLB yeah I heard there were story differences and sapphire looks completely different however I can't find it. I did found some scans but only i Japanese websites and I don't know which chapter they belong to |
More topics from this board
Poll: » Ribbon no Kishi (1963) Chapter 27 DiscussionEziprez - Feb 19, 2023 |
0 |
by Eziprez
»»
Feb 19, 2023 8:32 AM |