Oh. It seems ILoveAnimeGuys beat me to the punch. I came here to destroy criticize your review, but I suppose there is no need for me to do so now.
But seriously, your review wasn't bad in terms of structure or grammar. There was just no content to it. Kind of like an anime with good visuals, yet has no plot or memorable characters.
Hi, I wanted to provide you with feedback on your review. I didn't vote on it b/c I saw that you tried to make a good one.
1. You didn't provide enough info about the story like giving examples of what you liked/disliked about it.
2. It would've been great if you mentioned the characters.
3. I see that Blood Lad has an OVA, so this is probably shouldn't be a big deal. The OVA most likely will succeed in solving the cliffhangers. It's not a bad thing that you mentioned it, but I suggest not to mention cliffhangers for anime with sequels.
4. You tried hard not to be subjective. It's okay to be subjective, so feel free to talk about Art and Sound. Imo, fully objective reviews are quite boring.
All Comments (5) Comments
But seriously, your review wasn't bad in terms of structure or grammar. There was just no content to it. Kind of like an anime with good visuals, yet has no plot or memorable characters.
1. You didn't provide enough info about the story like giving examples of what you liked/disliked about it.
2. It would've been great if you mentioned the characters.
3. I see that Blood Lad has an OVA, so this is probably shouldn't be a big deal. The OVA most likely will succeed in solving the cliffhangers. It's not a bad thing that you mentioned it, but I suggest not to mention cliffhangers for anime with sequels.
4. You tried hard not to be subjective. It's okay to be subjective, so feel free to talk about Art and Sound. Imo, fully objective reviews are quite boring.
Also, if you're interested, check out this thread with tips of how to write a good review (http://myanimelist.net/forum/?topicid=62529). I hope this helps.