Forum SettingsEpisode Information
Forums
The Irregular at Magic High School (light novel)
Available on Manga Store
New
Pages (2) « 1 [2]
Apr 10, 2014 11:02 PM
The Destroyer.
Online
Feb 2013
661
Dragon_Slayer_X said:
No up until 13 volumes they are real siblings.......

You misunderstood something..........they are actually 11 months apart

From the LN:

(Shiba Tatsuya)
"I have often been asked that but we are not twins. I was born in April while
she was born in March. If I were born one month earlier or she were born
one month later, then we wouldn't be in the same school year."

They are actually 11 months apart so they are in the same school year.


Pretty much this.
Apr 10, 2014 11:57 PM
Offline
Jun 2010
331
iFourier said:
Both of them have the same mother.

I guess I'm such a douchebag so I better spoil everything.



Apr 11, 2014 8:32 AM

Offline
Sep 2013
2694
Confucius said:
In episode 1, the guy claims they aren't twins, but they were born on different months. Is it actually possible to give birth to one kid in one month and another one in the next?

Miyuki seems especially talented so I think Tatsuya was born in April the year before and Miyuki was born in March the year after. Because she calls Tatsuya "older brother" and that wouldnt make sense if she was born in March and he in April. But I mentioned her natural talent because she probably just started school a year early to be in his grade.
Apr 11, 2014 10:46 AM
Offline
Oct 2013
150
LazyLuong said:
iFourier said:
Both of them have the same mother.

I guess I'm such a douchebag so I better spoil everything.





thats what she said. Who knows if she wanted to get rid of his emotions anyway since his power was OP and he would be a good weapon.
Apr 11, 2014 11:35 AM
noiz cancelling

Offline
Jan 2008
990
Old_Raven said:
Confucius said:
In episode 1, the guy claims they aren't twins, but they were born on different months. Is it actually possible to give birth to one kid in one month and another one in the next?

Miyuki seems especially talented so I think Tatsuya was born in April the year before and Miyuki was born in March the year after. Because she calls Tatsuya "older brother" and that wouldnt make sense if she was born in March and he in April. But I mentioned her natural talent because she probably just started school a year early to be in his grade.


Her natural talent would have nothing to do with it. As others have already said, Japan tends to use April through the following year's March for grade cut-offs. He would be one of the oldest in the grade, and she would be one of the youngest, but it'd be perfectly in line with standard procedure.
Apr 11, 2014 11:44 AM
Offline
Jun 2010
331
iFourier said:
LazyLuong said:
iFourier said:
Both of them have the same mother.

I guess I'm such a douchebag so I better spoil everything.





thats what she said. Who knows if she wanted to get rid of his emotions anyway since his power was OP and he would be a good weapon.




Anyways, I need to stop talking about the LN since the spoiler tag really have no real purposes in MAL.
LazyLuongApr 11, 2014 11:50 AM
Apr 11, 2014 4:35 PM

Offline
Jul 2013
421
Tatsuya was born first in April. Miyuki was born 11 months later in March. The Japanese school year begins on April 1st. So anyone who was born in April up untill the next one will be put in the same grade. Hence why Tatsuya and Miyuki are in the same grade
Apr 11, 2014 4:48 PM
Offline
Oct 2013
348
iFourier said:
LazyLuong said:
iFourier said:
Both of them have the same mother.

I guess I'm such a douchebag so I better spoil everything.





thats what she said. Who knows if she wanted to get rid of his emotions anyway since his power was OP and he would be a good weapon.


Apr 11, 2014 6:28 PM

Offline
May 2011
831
LazyLuong said:
iFourier said:
Both of them have the same mother.

I guess I'm such a douchebag so I better spoil everything.





Apr 11, 2014 7:29 PM

Offline
Jul 2008
178
in Japan, we start compulsory education the first april after your 6th birthday which is the equivalent of 1st grade in the USA (kindergarten isn't mandatory).... so if you are born in the beginning of march, you start 1st grade about a month after your birthday 6th birthday. if you are born in the beginning of april, you start about a year after your 6th birthday since you would technically only be 5 at the beginning of the month.
Apr 11, 2014 8:09 PM
Offline
Jun 2010
331
Cirris said:


In a way, yes. Like I said, the series has a lot of discrimination in it.

RexZShadow said:
iFourier said:
LazyLuong said:
iFourier said:
Both of them have the same mother.

I guess I'm such a douchebag so I better spoil everything.





thats what she said. Who knows if she wanted to get rid of his emotions anyway since his power was OP and he would be a good weapon.




Apr 11, 2014 8:51 PM
Offline
Oct 2013
348




RexZShadowApr 11, 2014 8:56 PM
Apr 11, 2014 9:00 PM
Offline
Jun 2010
331
I stand corrected.
Apr 12, 2014 11:46 PM
Offline
Sep 2013
503
Back to the original question:

Yes, they are full-fledged siblings.
Yes, Miyuki wants fuck her brother, badly.
No, the series will most likely not cross the line.
Yes, they will both die virgins; or at least Miyuki will cuz once she's "tainted," the virgin hunters won't care about her anymore.

Honestly though, I never got that far into the manga; is he gonna be a Marty Stu like Kirito? I prefer it if he wasn't such a damn genius at everything but this could work too depending on how his character and the plot develops, just dear god, not another Kirito. Also, were there this many girls in the manga?
Apr 13, 2014 11:09 AM
Offline
Jun 2010
331
yes, he's a gary stu in that he's both extremely intelligent and strong. however, his strength comes from the fact of how he was raise and the duty of his existent. If he were to fail, he would be dead.

This is why he has a huge advantage over a lot of the other highschool student, who has never had to fight with their life on the line on a consistent basis.
LazyLuongApr 13, 2014 11:21 AM
Apr 13, 2014 1:14 PM
Offline
Oct 2013
348
LazyLuong said:
yes, he's a gary stu in that he's both extremely intelligent and strong. however, his strength comes from the fact of how he was raise and the duty of his existent. If he were to fail, he would be dead.

This is why he has a huge advantage over a lot of the other highschool student, who has never had to fight with their life on the line on a consistent basis.

Ya I'm ok with how strong he is coz he worked for it, wasn't like he is strong just coz and instantly game some retarded power to do w/e needs to be done. He constantly have to work under lot of restrictions but he still manage to get things done w/e inventing new power out his ass every time.
Apr 18, 2014 2:58 PM
Offline
Oct 2012
6648
LazyLuong said:
yes, he's a gary stu in that he's both extremely intelligent and strong.


Even if the protagonist is the strongest, smartest character it doesn't make him/her a "Stu". The thing that makes a Stu a Stu is the automatic universal admiration the character has from everyone in the story.

So Tatsuya is not a Stu; neither is Kirito, though all the female characters sighing over him makes him closer than Tatsuya. Even Naruto is not a Stu, though he is the strongest, smartest character whom everyone admires (he isn't a Stu because he has earned their admiration through a long difficult journey).

If being the strongest made one a Stu, then every action hero would be a Stu. If being the smartest made one a Stu, then every detective or psychological hero would be a Stu.

So a Stu can get a veteran Captain to violate every military protocol in having the character on the bridge (Wesley Crusher), inspire artists to do their best work (Sherri Tepper's Grass has an unintentionally great version of this), or inspire drunkards to give up the sauce (Little Nell, the protyptical Stu) through their angelic disposition (though of course these characters generally die, and are mourned by all).

That is a Stu, Tatsuya not so much.
Apr 18, 2014 3:13 PM
Offline
Aug 2012
2302
Takuan_Soho said:
LazyLuong said:
yes, he's a gary stu in that he's both extremely intelligent and strong.


Even if the protagonist is the strongest, smartest character it doesn't make him/her a "Stu". The thing that makes a Stu a Stu is the automatic universal admiration the character has from everyone in the story.

So Tatsuya is not a Stu; neither is Kirito, though all the female characters sighing over him makes him closer than Tatsuya. Even Naruto is not a Stu, though he is the strongest, smartest character whom everyone admires (he isn't a Stu because he has earned their admiration through a long difficult journey).

If being the strongest made one a Stu, then every action hero would be a Stu. If being the smartest made one a Stu, then every detective or psychological hero would be a Stu.

So a Stu can get a veteran Captain to violate every military protocol in having the character on the bridge (Wesley Crusher), inspire artists to do their best work (Sherri Tepper's Grass has an unintentionally great version of this), or inspire drunkards to give up the sauce (Little Nell, the protyptical Stu) through their angelic disposition (though of course these characters generally die, and are mourned by all).

That is a Stu, Tatsuya not so much.


Sadly people on the internet likes to throw those "stu" words around just because they see a OP characters. Tatsuya is definitely overpowered but that didn't just come out of nowhere, he has worked rather hard for it but he is smart or can be called a genius.

Apr 18, 2014 3:46 PM
Offline
Jun 2010
331
That is your definition of a stu.

A Gary Stu is just another variation of Mary Sue. It's a self-fulfillment character for the author, not necessary for the reader, as being the ideal person in that they are a combination of many things such as being smart, being strong, full of achievements, etc. and not just one. It's not necessary need to be the perfect being, but it is close to it as the ideal being for the author.

You will find more of his achievements are secrets as the series progresses. I will not spoil it for you.
LazyLuongApr 18, 2014 3:51 PM
Apr 18, 2014 3:54 PM
Offline
Oct 2013
348
LazyLuong said:
That is your definition of a stu.

A Gary Stu is just another variation of Mary Sue. It's a self-fulfillment character for the author, not necessary for the reader, as being the ideal person in that they are a combination of many things such as being smart, being strong, full of achievements, etc. and not just one. It's not necessary need to be the perfect being, but it is close to it as the ideal being for the author.

You will find more of his achievements are secrets as the series progresses. I will not spoil it for you.

Than isn't good 70%+ of MC Gary Stu since they all basically self-fulfillment for the author or the reader o.o?
Apr 18, 2014 4:20 PM
Offline
Jun 2010
331
In some sense, it is. But to avoid turning their MC into a gary stu character, flaws are often added to the character as imperfections, as well as rich background story explaining how they came to be, and other flaws and disadvantages.

In the end, it's really now noticeable it is to the reader.
Apr 18, 2014 5:27 PM
Offline
Oct 2013
348
LazyLuong said:
In some sense, it is. But to avoid turning their MC into a gary stu character, flaws are often added to the character as imperfections, as well as rich background story explaining how they came to be, and other flaws and disadvantages.

In the end, it's really now noticeable it is to the reader.


Basically Gary Stu be a super OP and perfect character thats OP and perfect for no reason? Ya that make sense.
Apr 18, 2014 5:46 PM
Offline
Oct 2012
6648
RexZShadow said:
LazyLuong said:
In some sense, it is. But to avoid turning their MC into a gary stu character, flaws are often added to the character as imperfections, as well as rich background story explaining how they came to be, and other flaws and disadvantages.

In the end, it's really now noticeable it is to the reader.


Basically Gary Stu be a super OP and perfect character thats OP and perfect for no reason? Ya that make sense.


Not quite. First a little history, the original use of Stu was not for male characters, but for female character called "Mary Sue", so OP is not necessarily a trait, though some form of "perfect" is generally (the link below gives a great example of a Stu from Star Trek).

Basically the Stu character is the personification of traits the author considers good and just, and as such cannot believe that anyone could possibly have issues with.

This is why I defined it as "automatic universal admiration the character has from everyone in the story," because that is the trait I think both shows that the writer doesn't realize what they are doing and something that is the easiest for the readers to identify (one can put up with a OP lead if the story is good, but an OP that every character gushes about really becomes annoying very quickly).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Sue
Apr 18, 2014 6:09 PM
Offline
Oct 2013
348
Ah ok that make lot more sense, well leave it to the internet to throw words w/o understanding what they mean =X
Apr 18, 2014 6:39 PM

Offline
Feb 2014
1170
Basically, Tatsuya started with max stats (battle attributes) since episode 1. heck, even he still in sealed form. If he started weaker then getting stronger after time, he could avoided the Gary Stu label(OP) on term of his strength. Yet, his "no emotion" personality actually make it worse.
Miyuki not exaggerating about Tatsuya never lose in true fight because he actually really never lost in true fight so far.
And, Tatsuya also mostly will get what he want if he try.
Yes, he is not a full Gary Stu. But, we actually can't fully denied he is Gary Stu either.
He just too plain in character even his flaws not help his characterization to the extent the story need other characters to make it up Tatsuya's plain personality.
Apr 18, 2014 7:26 PM
Offline
Oct 2012
6648
MShukyDeneuve said:
But, we actually can't fully denied he is Gary Stu either....He just too plain in character.


Your second statement contradicts the first statement. A "too plain" character cannot be a "Gary Stu" character. The whole point of a "Gary Stu" or "Mary Sue" is how gosh incredible they are supposed to be.
Apr 18, 2014 9:12 PM
Offline
Jun 2010
331
I don't think "automatic universal admiration the character has from everyone in the story" is quite right either. The definition is far too broad.

If we visualize the world of your definition, the world where everyone in the story admire the MC, there is no conflicts, arch-nemesis, no villains, no strangers, etc. Huge problem for a story to exist with such definition.

Now we will narrow it down to the MC's direct peers. The world where the MC's direct peers admires him, yet there can still envy, jealousy, strangers, enemies, villains, etc. This is a more believable definitions, but wouldn't this fit the definition of many of the MC out there. This is actually what happens, the peers he mainly interact with, acknowledge and/or admires him and therefore does fit the definition.

Then again, if we were to widen the range from his direct peers to his surroundings of both friends and foes, this will fall into the problem of never being able to fit the definitions. The whole "stu" definition should have existed in the first place.

Either way, arguing about word definition is silly overall, IMO, because news words are constantly created, while old words definition are constantly changing through time.
Apr 18, 2014 9:44 PM
Offline
Oct 2012
6648
LazyLuong said:
If we visualize the world of your definition, the world where everyone in the story admire the MC, there is no conflicts, arch-nemesis, no villains, no strangers, etc. Huge problem for a story to exist with such definition.


Not quite, there are villains or conflicts, but the "Stuness" of the character obliterates them in the end. That is why such stories are ultimately disappointing. If the MC actually has real challenges or conflicts then they wouldn't be a "Stu" character, they would just be a normal MC. If I wanted to point to a series that has obvious "Stuness" David Weber's Honor Series would be a perfect example: it isn't so much that she is smart and attractive, but rather that everyone, even her enemies ultimately love her (or if not love, at least admiring her spunk).

If a "Gary Stu" is a "all men want to be him and all women want to sleep with him" stereotype, then the Mary Sue type would be that gosh darn "not classically beautiful, but really great bone structure, goes aboard military ships with an intelligent cat on her shoulder, is a brilliant tactician even though really she doesn't do much, in the end she becomes a noble in an egalitarian society heroine.

LazyLuong said:
This is a more believable definitions,

But that is sort of the point. Stu characters are NOT believable, that is what makes them "Stu". Take Odysseus as an example: one of the best Greek warriors, and by far the smartest, he would be a perfect Stu character because of his OP qualities if not for the fact that he DOES have conflicts or problems. Stu's would have made Poseidon himself go "well he blinded my son, but gosh you gotta love his spunk in challenging us gods so I will let him return home"

That is what distinguishes a Stu from an MC or even an OP. It may be a neologism, but you can't take away this distinguishing feature and still have this word. If just being an MC or an OP is enough to make one "Stu" then there would not be the need for the word.
Apr 18, 2014 9:48 PM

Offline
Feb 2014
1170
Takuan_Soho said:
MShukyDeneuve said:
But, we actually can't fully denied he is Gary Stu either....He just too plain in character.


Your second statement contradicts the first statement. A "too plain" character cannot be a "Gary Stu" character. The whole point of a "Gary Stu" or "Mary Sue" is how gosh incredible they are supposed to be.


No, i am not. You just misunderstood me.
The whole point of my statement is "Because Tatsuya is too great, it ended up made his character too plain, almost any his flaws is ignored because his greatness"


He is too strong, too calm, too smart, too cool, basically a walking nuke, etc. Even his flaws not help his characterization more colorful, in the end made his greatness looks plain. got what i mean?

What you mean incredible, of course Tatsuya is incredible, on story wise ,that is. Everyone strangely attracted to him because his Plainness(greatness) , resulted the your "how gosh incredible he is supposed to be".

But, on characterization, he is too great that ended up it made him plain. The one who make it up for Tatsuya character is other characters(mainly their flaws), Miyuki's "brocon", Erika's over familiar, Hattori's discrimination, Leo's short temper, etc. Got that now.
Apr 18, 2014 10:07 PM
Offline
Oct 2012
6648
MShukyDeneuve said:
The whole point of my statement is "Because Tatsuya is too great, it ended up made his character too plain, almost any his flaws is ignored because his greatness"

He is too strong, too calm, too smart, too cool, basically a walking nuke, etc. Even his flaws not help his characterization more colorful, in the end made his greatness looks plain. got what i mean?

What you mean incredible, of course Tatsuya is incredible, on story wise ,that is. Everyone strangely attracted to him because his Plainness(greatness) , resulted the your "how gosh incredible he is supposed to be".

But, on characterization, he is too great that ended up it made him plain. The one who make it up for Tatsuya character is other characters(mainly their flaws), Miyuki's "brocon", Erika's over familiar, Hattori's discrimination, Leo's short temper, etc. Got that now.


I would disagree because at least the people who are attracted to him have been given reasons to be attracted to him: his sister because he saved her life at the start of the first episode; the student council president because she is after his sister and realizes that the shortest route is through him; the discipline committee member because she got the implications of his explanation at the end of the first episode (shown when she told the VP why she was interested) and realized what his talent actual was.

When the plot of the story makes the MC awesome, the MC is not a Stu. This is why Kirito ultimately was not a Stu (when the entire premise of the show is that they are trapped in a MMORPG that allows characters to "level up", that the MC "level's up" is not a fault of the character, but is rather tied to the premise of the show).

Tatsuya is not a Stu, because his emotionless personality is tied into why he is so strong, it's a plot development, not the author just making the MC too gosh darn awesome. That is the distinction.

Now this doesn't mean that Tatsuya will prove to be a great MC, but that is a different matter, one more associated with the plot than the ability of the author to make a believable character.

Too many people think "I dislike the MC therefore he is a Stu". That is not the case, far from defining something, all the word becomes is a tautology for "something I don't like". If that is the case then "Stu" has no meaning, all you have to say is "I don't like the character."
Apr 18, 2014 10:09 PM
Offline
Jun 2010
331
Takuan_Soho said:
It may be a neologism, but you can't take away this distinguishing feature and still have this word.


I would love to see you argue with someone about the definition of hacker, where one is using the original definition of the word hacker, while the other uses the more modern used definition of the word.

---

Well we're not using it because we dislike the character, well maybe the others are, but I know I'm not.
Apr 19, 2014 3:23 AM
Offline
Apr 2011
82
Well isn't Tatsuya different in away? The very society he lives in brands him a failure. The reaaon he lacks emotion is also a great insight into the world and explains why his personality is lacking... Tatsuya knows as a human he is effectively broken.. "I lost all of what you could call feelings of love. They weren't sealed, so they can't be released. They weren't broken, so they can't be fixed. That which is lost, cannot be recovered"
Apr 19, 2014 4:44 AM

Offline
Jan 2008
39
Takuan_Soho said:
MShukyDeneuve said:
The whole point of my statement is "Because Tatsuya is too great, it ended up made his character too plain, almost any his flaws is ignored because his greatness"

He is too strong, too calm, too smart, too cool, basically a walking nuke, etc. Even his flaws not help his characterization more colorful, in the end made his greatness looks plain. got what i mean?

What you mean incredible, of course Tatsuya is incredible, on story wise ,that is. Everyone strangely attracted to him because his Plainness(greatness) , resulted the your "how gosh incredible he is supposed to be".

But, on characterization, he is too great that ended up it made him plain. The one who make it up for Tatsuya character is other characters(mainly their flaws), Miyuki's "brocon", Erika's over familiar, Hattori's discrimination, Leo's short temper, etc. Got that now.


I would disagree because at least the people who are attracted to him have been given reasons to be attracted to him: his sister because he saved her life at the start of the first episode; the student council president because she is after his sister and realizes that the shortest route is through him; the discipline committee member because she got the implications of his explanation at the end of the first episode (shown when she told the VP why she was interested) and realized what his talent actual was.

When the plot of the story makes the MC awesome, the MC is not a Stu. This is why Kirito ultimately was not a Stu (when the entire premise of the show is that they are trapped in a MMORPG that allows characters to "level up", that the MC "level's up" is not a fault of the character, but is rather tied to the premise of the show).

Tatsuya is not a Stu, because his emotionless personality is tied into why he is so strong, it's a plot development, not the author just making the MC too gosh darn awesome. That is the distinction.

Now this doesn't mean that Tatsuya will prove to be a great MC, but that is a different matter, one more associated with the plot than the ability of the author to make a believable character.

Too many people think "I dislike the MC therefore he is a Stu". That is not the case, far from defining something, all the word becomes is a tautology for "something I don't like". If that is the case then "Stu" has no meaning, all you have to say is "I don't like the character."


Also Kirito was a beta tester for the game and so had inside information on the game that other people did not.
Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful.
Apr 19, 2014 8:11 AM

Offline
Oct 2013
3067
I was going to ask the same thing they better explain that.

Apr 19, 2014 8:19 AM
Offline
Aug 2012
2302
Saskee said:
I was going to ask the same thing they better explain that.


Read the first page, the topic already deviated from the original post.

Apr 19, 2014 2:12 PM

Offline
Feb 2014
1170
Takuan_Soho said:
MShukyDeneuve said:
The whole point of my statement is "Because Tatsuya is too great, it ended up made his character too plain, almost any his flaws is ignored because his greatness"

He is too strong, too calm, too smart, too cool, basically a walking nuke, etc. Even his flaws not help his characterization more colorful, in the end made his greatness looks plain. got what i mean?

What you mean incredible, of course Tatsuya is incredible, on story wise ,that is. Everyone strangely attracted to him because his Plainness(greatness) , resulted the your "how gosh incredible he is supposed to be".

But, on characterization, he is too great that ended up it made him plain. The one who make it up for Tatsuya character is other characters(mainly their flaws), Miyuki's "brocon", Erika's over familiar, Hattori's discrimination, Leo's short temper, etc. Got that now.


I would disagree because at least the people who are attracted to him have been given reasons to be attracted to him: his sister because he saved her life at the start of the first episode; the student council president because she is after his sister and realizes that the shortest route is through him; the discipline committee member because she got the implications of his explanation at the end of the first episode (shown when she told the VP why she was interested) and realized what his talent actual was.

When the plot of the story makes the MC awesome, the MC is not a Stu. This is why Kirito ultimately was not a Stu (when the entire premise of the show is that they are trapped in a MMORPG that allows characters to "level up", that the MC "level's up" is not a fault of the character, but is rather tied to the premise of the show).

Tatsuya is not a Stu, because his emotionless personality is tied into why he is so strong, it's a plot development, not the author just making the MC too gosh darn awesome. That is the distinction.

Now this doesn't mean that Tatsuya will prove to be a great MC, but that is a different matter, one more associated with the plot than the ability of the author to make a believable character.

Too many people think "I dislike the MC therefore he is a Stu". That is not the case, far from defining something, all the word becomes is a tautology for "something I don't like". If that is the case then "Stu" has no meaning, all you have to say is "I don't like the character."


That's the author idea,that is why he is a plain character, he needs the other characters to make his character more colorful...Envy, love, jealously, interested toward him. Without that he is plain, a living robot.

For me, Kirito is a pure Gary Stu though. The author try to give a reason why he this and that, but it still makes no sense. Have many information, beta tester, resulted he have max stats even soloing big boss...The author just need to be honest and said Kirito is using cheat(which fit with game genre) that is why he almost invincible for example, that is more believable rather than something vague and roundabout way like information this and information that. But, let say we have different idea toward Kirito.
As for Tatsuya, it still make no sense though, till last vol...He actually the strongest in the world, even the aunt acknowledged she might lose 1 on 1 against Tatsuya. Again, the author try to give flaws to Tatsuya's character, but it have no effect because his greatness can kick that flaws away. It is not plot development, he already like that since episode 1 and till last vol, he still like that. We never seen he have actual problem with his battle because of his flaws for example, he just casually overpowering enemies. Until he can be defeated in a fight, then i stand on my opinion that he is nonsensically OP. And yes, the author made Tatsuya too gosh darn awesome and ended up plain. He basically have no flaw even the author try to give him ones because we never seen he truly affected by it.

BUT, i think he is great MC in this series though...Yeah, that because almost all people is a bunch of douchebag. Arrogant but weakling, discrimination everywhere, bullying, a rigid society, etc. It makes Tatsuya a least bad one in a bunch of worst characters . For example, if i compare it with other series, there is time when i actually cheering/ sympathetic on enemy, because even though the enemy is evil, but he/she is a good built character. Yet, in Mahouka, all enemies is just a bunch of 2D evil who just became evil because of silly reason or did not have any good trait at all. Even Lina who is a decent one still fail in my eyes.

Even though i considered Tatsuya not a Gary Stu, but i can't actually disagree on people who said he is a Stu, because for me he have Stu trait even though it can be ignored.
But, if it comes to the never ending arguments situation, at least i can agree that Tatsuya is a "good" Stu.
If i allowed to complain though, i want Tatsuya a bit weaker or see him struggle rather than easily crush everything on his path. Yet, he is too great that he actually can accomplished anything alone and ironically failed because of his friends influenced.
FlashofthebackApr 19, 2014 2:19 PM
Apr 19, 2014 2:55 PM
Offline
Apr 2014
89
i just want to say this i dont know why everyone think tatsuya is Gary sue
1)for me overpower character is totally meaningless in this series because until the volume 9 he was very powerful but that is because all of his opponent was to arrogant and prideful plus they are the same age so did not go into combat much and they were from his country
2) the GAA is very low on information about magic because all there magical research was destroy so they are not really that strong
3) after volume 9 tatsuya almost die or would've lost in battle because this time he face a real opponent from a greatly advance country and everything in the show is not like if u can nuke u can always win because u would die in process
4)to win is like rock,paper,scissor if u can counter it u maybe able to defeat it and tatsuya almost lost because of this and this is also a reason why he can defeat his aunt because he can counter it while other people cant do that
5)while he is smart but what is wrong with that i mean he cant live a normal life for many reason one is his emotion and two is his family and he almost die many times that could be the reason he research and get smarter plus he got talent for it anyways
6)his power is not absolute because some people could counter it maybe able to defeat it
7)lastly his opponent is no longer just human like volume 9 just prove
oldguestApr 19, 2014 3:09 PM
Apr 19, 2014 3:53 PM
Offline
Jan 2014
18
MShukyDeneuve said:
Takuan_Soho said:
MShukyDeneuve said:
The whole point of my statement is "Because Tatsuya is too great, it ended up made his character too plain, almost any his flaws is ignored because his greatness"

He is too strong, too calm, too smart, too cool, basically a walking nuke, etc. Even his flaws not help his characterization more colorful, in the end made his greatness looks plain. got what i mean?

What you mean incredible, of course Tatsuya is incredible, on story wise ,that is. Everyone strangely attracted to him because his Plainness(greatness) , resulted the your "how gosh incredible he is supposed to be".

But, on characterization, he is too great that ended up it made him plain. The one who make it up for Tatsuya character is other characters(mainly their flaws), Miyuki's "brocon", Erika's over familiar, Hattori's discrimination, Leo's short temper, etc. Got that now.


I would disagree because at least the people who are attracted to him have been given reasons to be attracted to him: his sister because he saved her life at the start of the first episode; the student council president because she is after his sister and realizes that the shortest route is through him; the discipline committee member because she got the implications of his explanation at the end of the first episode (shown when she told the VP why she was interested) and realized what his talent actual was.

When the plot of the story makes the MC awesome, the MC is not a Stu. This is why Kirito ultimately was not a Stu (when the entire premise of the show is that they are trapped in a MMORPG that allows characters to "level up", that the MC "level's up" is not a fault of the character, but is rather tied to the premise of the show).

Tatsuya is not a Stu, because his emotionless personality is tied into why he is so strong, it's a plot development, not the author just making the MC too gosh darn awesome. That is the distinction.

Now this doesn't mean that Tatsuya will prove to be a great MC, but that is a different matter, one more associated with the plot than the ability of the author to make a believable character.

Too many people think "I dislike the MC therefore he is a Stu". That is not the case, far from defining something, all the word becomes is a tautology for "something I don't like". If that is the case then "Stu" has no meaning, all you have to say is "I don't like the character."


I spoiler most of what you said due to it being partly spoilers and in some parts wrong and misleading. Hence my response in spoilers (which will also spoil parts of the anime if people read so you have been warned):
SinarBloodApr 19, 2014 9:39 PM
Apr 24, 2014 8:15 PM

Offline
Jun 2013
436
SinarBlood said:
MShukyDeneuve said:
Takuan_Soho said:
MShukyDeneuve said:
The whole point of my statement is "Because Tatsuya is too great, it ended up made his character too plain, almost any his flaws is ignored because his greatness"

He is too strong, too calm, too smart, too cool, basically a walking nuke, etc. Even his flaws not help his characterization more colorful, in the end made his greatness looks plain. got what i mean?

What you mean incredible, of course Tatsuya is incredible, on story wise ,that is. Everyone strangely attracted to him because his Plainness(greatness) , resulted the your "how gosh incredible he is supposed to be".

But, on characterization, he is too great that ended up it made him plain. The one who make it up for Tatsuya character is other characters(mainly their flaws), Miyuki's "brocon", Erika's over familiar, Hattori's discrimination, Leo's short temper, etc. Got that now.


I would disagree because at least the people who are attracted to him have been given reasons to be attracted to him: his sister because he saved her life at the start of the first episode; the student council president because she is after his sister and realizes that the shortest route is through him; the discipline committee member because she got the implications of his explanation at the end of the first episode (shown when she told the VP why she was interested) and realized what his talent actual was.

When the plot of the story makes the MC awesome, the MC is not a Stu. This is why Kirito ultimately was not a Stu (when the entire premise of the show is that they are trapped in a MMORPG that allows characters to "level up", that the MC "level's up" is not a fault of the character, but is rather tied to the premise of the show).

Tatsuya is not a Stu, because his emotionless personality is tied into why he is so strong, it's a plot development, not the author just making the MC too gosh darn awesome. That is the distinction.

Now this doesn't mean that Tatsuya will prove to be a great MC, but that is a different matter, one more associated with the plot than the ability of the author to make a believable character.

Too many people think "I dislike the MC therefore he is a Stu". That is not the case, far from defining something, all the word becomes is a tautology for "something I don't like". If that is the case then "Stu" has no meaning, all you have to say is "I don't like the character."


I spoiler most of what you said due to it being partly spoilers and in some parts wrong and misleading. Hence my response in spoilers (which will also spoil parts of the anime if people read so you have been warned):


I pretty much agree with all your points, although I don't think Angie
Apr 24, 2014 9:22 PM
Offline
Oct 2013
348
Apr 24, 2014 9:26 PM

Offline
Jul 2013
2037
krownklown said:
SinarBlood said:
MShukyDeneuve said:
Takuan_Soho said:
MShukyDeneuve said:
The whole point of my statement is "Because Tatsuya is too great, it ended up made his character too plain, almost any his flaws is ignored because his greatness"

He is too strong, too calm, too smart, too cool, basically a walking nuke, etc. Even his flaws not help his characterization more colorful, in the end made his greatness looks plain. got what i mean?

What you mean incredible, of course Tatsuya is incredible, on story wise ,that is. Everyone strangely attracted to him because his Plainness(greatness) , resulted the your "how gosh incredible he is supposed to be".

But, on characterization, he is too great that ended up it made him plain. The one who make it up for Tatsuya character is other characters(mainly their flaws), Miyuki's "brocon", Erika's over familiar, Hattori's discrimination, Leo's short temper, etc. Got that now.


I would disagree because at least the people who are attracted to him have been given reasons to be attracted to him: his sister because he saved her life at the start of the first episode; the student council president because she is after his sister and realizes that the shortest route is through him; the discipline committee member because she got the implications of his explanation at the end of the first episode (shown when she told the VP why she was interested) and realized what his talent actual was.

When the plot of the story makes the MC awesome, the MC is not a Stu. This is why Kirito ultimately was not a Stu (when the entire premise of the show is that they are trapped in a MMORPG that allows characters to "level up", that the MC "level's up" is not a fault of the character, but is rather tied to the premise of the show).

Tatsuya is not a Stu, because his emotionless personality is tied into why he is so strong, it's a plot development, not the author just making the MC too gosh darn awesome. That is the distinction.

Now this doesn't mean that Tatsuya will prove to be a great MC, but that is a different matter, one more associated with the plot than the ability of the author to make a believable character.

Too many people think "I dislike the MC therefore he is a Stu". That is not the case, far from defining something, all the word becomes is a tautology for "something I don't like". If that is the case then "Stu" has no meaning, all you have to say is "I don't like the character."


I spoiler most of what you said due to it being partly spoilers and in some parts wrong and misleading. Hence my response in spoilers (which will also spoil parts of the anime if people read so you have been warned):


I pretty much agree with all your points, although I don't think Angie

What, you're confusing something here,

Apr 24, 2014 10:09 PM

Offline
Jun 2013
436
EasyGo-er said:
krownklown said:
SinarBlood said:
MShukyDeneuve said:
Takuan_Soho said:
MShukyDeneuve said:
The whole point of my statement is "Because Tatsuya is too great, it ended up made his character too plain, almost any his flaws is ignored because his greatness"

He is too strong, too calm, too smart, too cool, basically a walking nuke, etc. Even his flaws not help his characterization more colorful, in the end made his greatness looks plain. got what i mean?

What you mean incredible, of course Tatsuya is incredible, on story wise ,that is. Everyone strangely attracted to him because his Plainness(greatness) , resulted the your "how gosh incredible he is supposed to be".

But, on characterization, he is too great that ended up it made him plain. The one who make it up for Tatsuya character is other characters(mainly their flaws), Miyuki's "brocon", Erika's over familiar, Hattori's discrimination, Leo's short temper, etc. Got that now.


I would disagree because at least the people who are attracted to him have been given reasons to be attracted to him: his sister because he saved her life at the start of the first episode; the student council president because she is after his sister and realizes that the shortest route is through him; the discipline committee member because she got the implications of his explanation at the end of the first episode (shown when she told the VP why she was interested) and realized what his talent actual was.

When the plot of the story makes the MC awesome, the MC is not a Stu. This is why Kirito ultimately was not a Stu (when the entire premise of the show is that they are trapped in a MMORPG that allows characters to "level up", that the MC "level's up" is not a fault of the character, but is rather tied to the premise of the show).

Tatsuya is not a Stu, because his emotionless personality is tied into why he is so strong, it's a plot development, not the author just making the MC too gosh darn awesome. That is the distinction.

Now this doesn't mean that Tatsuya will prove to be a great MC, but that is a different matter, one more associated with the plot than the ability of the author to make a believable character.

Too many people think "I dislike the MC therefore he is a Stu". That is not the case, far from defining something, all the word becomes is a tautology for "something I don't like". If that is the case then "Stu" has no meaning, all you have to say is "I don't like the character."


I spoiler most of what you said due to it being partly spoilers and in some parts wrong and misleading. Hence my response in spoilers (which will also spoil parts of the anime if people read so you have been warned):


I pretty much agree with all your points, although I don't think Angie

What, you're confusing something here,


Yes and no
Apr 24, 2014 10:10 PM
Offline
Oct 2013
348


Edit:
RexZShadowApr 24, 2014 10:28 PM
Apr 24, 2014 11:22 PM

Offline
Jul 2013
2037
@krownklown


@RexZShadow

Apr 25, 2014 4:48 AM

Offline
Jun 2013
436
EasyGo-er said:
@krownklown


@RexZShadow


My thing is though, his ability must be used actively by him to heal others, but its passive or automatic for him and remember he is not healing he is
Apr 25, 2014 8:31 AM
Offline
Oct 2013
348
Apr 25, 2014 3:15 PM

Offline
Jun 2013
436
RexZShadow said:


Yea since
Apr 26, 2014 12:15 AM
Offline
Oct 2013
423
Confucius said:
In episode 1, the guy claims they aren't twins, but they were born on different months. Is it actually possible to give birth to one kid in one month and another one in the next?
theirs a 13 month difference its like over here in the states if your bday is after lets say august you have to wait a year to start school so Tatsuya is 1 year old but (using my example) born in September he starts school at age 6 where as his sis is 1 year younger but born in august she gets to start school at age 5 so they both start school at the same time
“How strange and foolish is man. He loses his health in gaining wealth. Then, to regain his health he wastes his wealth. He ruins his present while worrying about his future, but weeps in the future by recalling his past. He lives as though death shall never come to him, but dies in a way as if he were never born”
― Imam Ali as
Apr 26, 2014 1:20 AM

Offline
Jul 2013
2037
odysseyrh said:
Confucius said:
In episode 1, the guy claims they aren't twins, but they were born on different months. Is it actually possible to give birth to one kid in one month and another one in the next?
theirs a 13 month difference its like over here in the states if your bday is after lets say august you have to wait a year to start school so Tatsuya is 1 year old but (using my example) born in September he starts school at age 6 where as his sis is 1 year younger but born in august she gets to start school at age 5 so they both start school at the same time

In this case, school year in Japan starts with April and ends with March the following year. As an example, Tatsuya who was born in April 2013 is the oldest one while Miyuki who was born in March 2014 is the youngest one in their school year. Both were able to attend the same year because they're considered to be of the same age based on the Japanese's school system. This means that there's 11 months gap between them. Many were confused because they thought the siblings were born on the same year while it's actually not and this was only made possible because of the Japanese's school system.

Apr 26, 2014 10:26 PM

Offline
Mar 2013
2801
Doesn't matter how they're related, it'll never happen.
[size=200]MAL AVATAR SYSTEM BLOWS
Pages (2) « 1 [2]

More topics from this board

» Sooo is there incest in this anime ? (may contain spoilers )

Zyro_Plaze - 11 hours ago

22 by ElmoBoredAsf »»
3 hours ago

Poll: » Mahouka Koukou no Rettousei Episode 26 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )

Stark700 - Sep 27, 2014

457 by ExSant0 »»
Apr 19, 2:43 PM

Poll: » Mahouka Koukou no Rettousei Episode 5 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )

Stark700 - May 3, 2014

308 by taifd77 »»
Apr 6, 8:00 AM

» Romance Tag?

akihiko132 - Dec 8, 2020

4 by fqdnl »»
Apr 3, 6:27 PM

Poll: » Shipping For Tatsuya X .......

Ricky16 - Sep 1, 2023

28 by AGiantWeeb »»
Mar 24, 6:34 AM

Preview MangaManga Store

It’s time to ditch the text file.
Keep track of your anime easily by creating your own list.
Sign Up Login