Some people criticize the original work without reading it all the way through, saying that it is not historically accurate, but that is a completely misguided criticism. It is also not a story of religious criticism.
I have read the original work to the end, but those who criticize it must not have read the original work.
They still don't understand the author's intention. And the author, UOTO, drew this story knowing that it is not a historical fact.
