Hrybami said:Blood_Mage03 said: the scoring.
Hrybami said:Blood_Mage03 said:Hrybami said:Blood_Mage03 said:Hrybami said:Tropisch said:Hrybami said:TsukuyomiREKT said:Hentry said:Kuma said:supransh said:Don't get me wrong the series is quite a fun read but 8.93 is too high of a score in my opinion.
thanks for your opinion, BUT WHO THE FUCK CARES?
I care, also try to respect his opinion or gtfo
If someone feels the need to make a "tHiS iS oVeRrAtEd" thread, then I'm not going to respect their opinion. Especially when they don't even attempt to make any arguments.
People like you who cannot respect other people's opinion is the reason why threads end up derailing. Good job.
Pretty hypocritical coming from you.
This remark was pretty hypocritical as well.
This was a bait post that called a really popular webtoon overrated for no reason. Those who bait and then have no reasoning for why they said what they did, should not be taken seriously.
The OP obviously like the series. He just said that he felt like the score is overrated.
If I was to make the exact same thread but saying it is underrated instead of overrated. Would it still be called a bait?
Yes, if you called a bad show underrated and had no reasoning for why you thought so then yes, it would still be bait. How can you say something is overrated or underrated if there is no basis for your argument? Even a shitty reason is better than no reason!
Oh really? Because I always see people saying "This show is good" without giving any argument. I guess they are all baiting then. Strangely enough nobody say those people are baiting when it's a positive comment unless the anime is Shitcom or something like that.
It's also not like if people stop having opinion the moment they don't give an argument. You don't trust people until they give a reasoning or what? Please.
You just brought in a completely different point. Saying that a show is good means that you as an individual like it, not stating that the communities ideas of it are faulty. Also, most of those threads back it up by stating what they specifically like about the new season or show. For example, I absolutely despise the recent 2 seasons of SAO cause the story is shit and every character besides kirito is useless, but there are still people who praise it due to its fluid animation and badass character. Do I think that those people are wrong regarding the fact that these 2 seasons of SAO are amazing, yes I do, but do the people provide a good reason as to why they love the arc and as to why people should see SAO in a different light, yes they do. Their opinion adds information that makes me think differently about the show, and even maybe appreciate more than if someone just spammed the fact that SAO is the most underrated show with absolutely no basis for their statement.
Also, your logic behind the fact that I interpreted that people should not have an opinion unless they back it up is flawd. I said that their opinion has no value to any discussion because there is nothing new to add to the conversation. They can have their opinion, but if there is literally nothing new that they add to the conversation, then their opinion holds zero value, and if you think that I am wrong, argue with any English teacher solely on the basis that a book is underrated or overrated without giving them a reason as to why you think so, and see if their opinion sways in any meaningful way. Unless the op gives me a basis for why they hold their opinion, it will just be irrelevant, since I currently see no major flaws in the story warranting it to be overrated.
That doesn't make any sense at all.
An opinion cannot be good or bad depending on how much you agree with it. You're basically saying that people may be wrong for liking something, but if they have the argument you agree with then it's okay even though they are wrong. You literally cannot accept anyone's opinion unless you agree with their arguments.
My logic wasn't flawed. People can have an opinion without detailing it to you. I never mentioned that they needed to enter into a conversation to have an opinion. They can have an opinion without debating around it. You just brought up the discussion point now for attempting to break my point with something unrelated.
Actually, I understand why people don't develop their opinions further than that. It's simply because nobody cares about you. They didn't intend to have a conversation with you. You could have approached them and trying to have a discussion with them. But no, disrespecting people's opinion is easier.
Also, you English Teacher point absolutely doesn't make any sense. It is foremost a fallacy known as the appeal to the authority for taking someone to prove a point. They could always been wrong all along and it won't mean that I cannot be right either way. Also, what could they possibly know if a book is overrated or underrated to me. Those terms are used to describe an opinion which basically means: "I think that this book is not as good or better than what the general audience think". Or by simplifying with "I disagree with the amount of praise this book currently receives" Should be more or should be less. Overrated or Underrated are words describing an opinions, not about developing it. So the teacher could as well explain their opinions, it doesn't mean I was wrong to like or dislike something.
OP is only irrelevant to you, many people like myself care about his opinion because we learned to respect other people's opinion. Maybe, who knows, OP might have better arguments than you.
If the op wanted to hold a discussion they would respond to the several people that quoted them and called out their opinion as irrelevant due to the fact that the op had no evidence. Personally, I dont give a shit if the op doesnt care about me, so thats why I said that their opinion is irrelevant. If the op wants to tell me why I am wrong then they can go ahead, but I dont see a reason as to why I have to respect an opinion that has no value outside of just throwing shade on the webtoon.
Secondly, this thread could also be easilly called spam under MAL's rule, which describes spam as "Content without any purpose, coherency or relevance whatsoever." I would absolutely love you to tell me the purpose of this thread other than just throwing shade on its popularity just because its popular. There was no clear attempt to facilitate a discussion, so I would love for you to tell me as to why this thread was made.