Yeshaiah2015yesh said:ashutoshanime said:
That maybe a possibility as you say this now but now as every chapter drops, it gives new perspectives of events which constantly changing the theories.For example, the latest chapter 1113 which made us head scratch when Vegapunk said his theory about the world will sink. Now if we see the entire OP plot with this theory of Vegapunk, then it can be of multiple ways such as Roger probably was aware of this theory and started the great pirate era which drove millions to the sea, aqua laguna at water 7, tequila bridge being this huge and ofcourse the redline where the "gods" reside, etc. I can understand the whole stussy clone and weevil thing but I find it very hard that it might be the same case with Olivia. If i remember correctly, it was said that she did join a pirate group to complete the "unfinished task" of her husband and yet we don't know who is Robin's father. If you analyse the strawhat crew, we don't know Luffy's mom, Zoro's family kinda was already revealed in the SBS, Nami's true parents, Franky's parents who are pirates and abandoned him. The only strawhat we got all the proper backstory is Sanji otherwise we know little about every other strawhats now.
will will your keeping up with SBS, impressive.
with my bull shit theory i just ust came up on the fluke. i can still connect the dots, like after giving birthing to luffy, Nico Olvia clone, joines revolutionary army ofc hiding that dragon and she ware in a intimate relationship before. after some time she developed a different mind set or dissatisfaction or disagreement with dragon. and Nico Olvia clone asked Youvanka for a gender transfer and becomes the infamous crocodile mummy. which will fit with the ongoing theory perfectly. if it's so hard to believe.
will anyways bro i don't want to have beef with you or anything like that.
the reason i commented that way because, i already admitted that, i don't know to the guy who first comment.
so just pointed out the possibility. thats all.
and iam still admitting that my take on the matter was wrong. but you still aside the same thing as the first guy. so i commented that way
i wasn't being serious with the other commitments, just point some possibility that's al l . so sorry if I made a wrong impression .