Forum SettingsEpisode Information
Forums
New
Feb 22, 2016 1:20 PM
#1

Offline
Oct 2014
293
... Because the only thing I've heard is that people hate the characters and the story pisses them off, but that is an invalid criticism. That's like hating water for being wet... if that makes sense. There is a difference between hating the characters and the characters being bad.
Feb 22, 2016 1:24 PM
#2

Offline
Apr 2013
11991
It wasn't a typical rom-com and has a negative outlook — this is enough to put half of the userbase off, their fragile sensibilities were upset.
Feb 22, 2016 1:31 PM
#3

Offline
Oct 2010
11839
Yeah of course, the points about null personalities, cheesy soap opera development, unimpressive artwork, etc. have absolutely never been made.
Feb 22, 2016 1:50 PM
#4

Offline
Dec 2012
24355
Candy said:
It wasn't a typical rom-com and has a negative outlook — this is enough to put half of the userbase off, their fragile sensibilities were upset.

It's not a rom/com to be typical or not in the first place.

School days is more akin to the cheap western/latino soap opera drama where cheating is the biggest plot device. In that sense sure, it's not typical by anime standards (thankfully anime doesn't have this kind of garbo). Doesn't make it any less awful and generic in terms of story and characters.
Feb 22, 2016 2:51 PM
#5

Offline
Apr 2013
11991
I watched this so long ago I can barely remember any of the finer details but it certainly had more going for it than trying to create drama for its own sake like those typical soap operas. The characters were evidently thematic props and ignoring this aspect to say they were depthless and basing that as the reason why the anime is shit is missing the point of using them like that, equivalently so would claims of unrealism. Unless you have a problem with that style, in general, or think its execution is poor in relating whatever themes it had going on you shouldn't use it as the excuse.
Feb 22, 2016 3:48 PM
#6

Offline
Oct 2010
11839
Candy said:
I watched this so long ago I can barely remember any of the finer details but it certainly had more going for it than trying to create drama for its own sake like those typical soap operas. The characters were evidently thematic props and ignoring this aspect to say they were depthless and basing that as the reason why the anime is shit is missing the point of using them like that, equivalently so would claims of unrealism. Unless you have a problem with that style, in general, or think its execution is poor in relating whatever themes it had going on you shouldn't use it as the excuse.

I see it in a kind of different light. The series stems from a quite promising and interesting premise and the execution doesn't live up. You claim that the characters don't need depth or exploration but I'd say that this made the emotional impression basically non-existant. The series doesn't take advantage of its own chance to catch the viewer off-guard and all we have is a blank exposition of ideas through vehicles (characters) who don't feel organic, relatable or just human beyond their preset roles. Instead of making this "harem turned dark" idea attractive, it is reduced to the minimal expression, therefore becoming just a matter of finding this premise admirable enough to sit through 12 episodes of emotionally drained nothingness.
Feb 22, 2016 5:07 PM
#7

Offline
Apr 2013
11991
jal90 said:
Candy said:
I watched this so long ago I can barely remember any of the finer details but it certainly had more going for it than trying to create drama for its own sake like those typical soap operas. The characters were evidently thematic props and ignoring this aspect to say they were depthless and basing that as the reason why the anime is shit is missing the point of using them like that, equivalently so would claims of unrealism. Unless you have a problem with that style, in general, or think its execution is poor in relating whatever themes it had going on you shouldn't use it as the excuse.

I see it in a kind of different light. The series stems from a quite promising and interesting premise and the execution doesn't live up. You claim that the characters don't need depth or exploration but I'd say that this made the emotional impression basically non-existant. The series doesn't take advantage of its own chance to catch the viewer off-guard and all we have is a blank exposition of ideas through vehicles (characters) who don't feel organic, relatable or just human beyond their preset roles. Instead of making this "harem turned dark" idea attractive, it is reduced to the minimal expression, therefore becoming just a matter of finding this premise admirable enough to sit through 12 episodes of emotionally drained nothingness.

I honestly don't think those things are necessary, imagine if they tried to add emotional hooks all over the place with those characters, sure they're dry but they fit the role, just for viewer appeasement going out of their way to make the characters more warm and 'human' would make a farce out of the story they're pushing, since that would then seem out of place.
The style they used would obviously only work if the themes are interesting to the viewer, you didn't appreciate it all that much and therefore also not whole show. I'm sure you can think of another show (not necessarily anime) where you did 'put up' with emotionally barren characters because you were otherwise hooked with the themes.
That's kinda my point here, enjoyment or not for these types of shows lies in the thematic element firstly and then spreads to the other parts . Even if the execution is shoddy you'll at least not dislike it then given interest there. Emotional attachment to 'soulless' characters don't seem so improbable with thematic interest. Neither for any of the other superficial factors, like plot movers for instance.
Feb 23, 2016 1:12 PM
#8

Offline
Apr 2013
11991
DerTwist said:
Candy said:

I honestly don't think those things are necessary, imagine if they tried to add emotional hooks all over the place with those characters, sure they're dry but they fit the role, just for viewer appeasement going out of their way to make the characters more warm and 'human' would make a farce out of the story they're pushing, since that would then seem out of place.
The style they used would obviously only work if the themes are interesting to the viewer, you didn't appreciate it all that much and therefore also not whole show. I'm sure you can think of another show (not necessarily anime) where you did 'put up' with emotionally barren characters because you were otherwise hooked with the themes.

I would agree in some cases, but not this one. It seemed like the premise of this show was to try and hook you to the characters to appreciate the 'psychological' element to it. The ending happened because Sekai was pushed too far, Kotohana was falling apart but still pretty disturbingly obsessed with Makoto, etc, the themes of how Makoto's supposed care-free harem was actually tearing people apart was one of the things I have seen people try to justify about it, how ignorant cheating can push people to breaking point. The fact that the characters all felt so synthetic though made it completely lose that element to it and make it look like an angsty teen's wet dream and made the ending for a lot of people feel like some cop-out bullshit which came from nowhere. Emotional development would have helped this show at least a little to try and get a psychological element across instead of come across as painfully obviously try to be as shocking as possible.
"Try and hook you to the characters to appreciate the 'psychological' element to it", isn't that the same as trying to push the theme on to you as a primary objective? Also since you do recognize a theme in there how can you say that it was "just for shock value" at the same time? Isn't that simply your stance because you disliked the execution and the "synthetic" characters? I don't disagree with the rest of what you said.
Feb 23, 2016 3:22 PM
#9
Offline
Jan 2015
27
Because it started out as a generic ecchi and then tried to be edgy by adding a scene of gory stuff at the end. If it had remained as a simple harem/ecchi then I wouldn't have minded, because what I expect from those shows is just fanservice and 0 character development, what pissed me off is that they probably did that thing at the end just so people would be "shocked" and they were, some even dared to say that this is a deep psychological anime when all it has is big boobs, small boobs, lolis, and a sudden death.

More topics from this board

Poll: » School Days Episode 3 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )

Haoji - Jul 22, 2007

143 by angecritter »»
Yesterday, 2:08 AM

Poll: » School Days Episode 5 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 )

itainteazy - Aug 2, 2007

184 by illwill_sch »»
Sep 4, 4:47 PM

Poll: » School Days Episode 2 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )

cyruz - Jul 13, 2007

126 by 000557A »»
Aug 16, 3:43 AM

» Is School Days a misunderstood masterpiece? ( 1 2 )

SkyEatsOcean - Jan 30, 2015

54 by SteelingMax »»
Jul 21, 3:45 AM

Poll: » School Days Episode 12 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )

Ranivus - Sep 20, 2007

1307 by Archfiend836 »»
Jun 28, 3:06 PM
It’s time to ditch the text file.
Keep track of your anime easily by creating your own list.
Sign Up Login