Je te hais Océan! tes bonds et tes tumultes,
Mon esprit les retrouve en lui; ce rire amer
De l'homme vaincu, plein de sanglots et d'insultes,
Je l'entends dans le rire énorme de la mer ~ Obsession, Charles Baudelaire
They never do. Ambition is either something obtainable and realistic or it's just a momentary surge of testosterone. The ideal that heroes go around with is always vague and unrealistic. I want to make the world a better place!! -- HOW?? -- By killing criminals yaaay!! -- *facepalm*
It can just as well come from "too much" emotion.
Desensitization, duh.
a lack of concern for the lives and other things that are going to waste
LMAO isn't that what not feeling emotion is?
And yes, empathy is a learned virtue. It doesn't really exist by default except for one's closest family.
Nope. That would actually depend on the reason you destroyed the world, and the way you did it. Stealing hi-tech equipments and doing stupid things could just as well bring a world destruction.
You're comparing accidental cases with intentional ones. In one case, it's you who is destroying the world; in the other case, it's your mistake that is destroying the world. Regardless, the 'reason' for destroying the world has no bearing on your intelligence.
TeenEdge is when you show symptoms of both Shinji and Kaneki. And yes it's the gayest things ever but 12 year old girls are attracted to it.
If you're a shitlord, life can never be boring. Even boredom itself will be entertaining because you can always bombard others with your verbosity and destroy their livelihood. #iamverysmart
Ambition is irrelevant. You do not relate with someone because he/she has the same motives as you. The criteria for 'relating' lies in the same pattern of thinking. And two identical patterns need not begin from the same point and end at the another same point. What I relate with is not their megalomania or grand ambitions. I relate with their intellectual rigor, their drive to do something.
Not feeling any emotions doesn't mean you can destroy the world
But if you have destroyed the world (or are destroying it) then it definitely means you have no emotions.
The inverse isn't true either.
Look up. Stop destroying formal logic pls.
It takes more than just a good brain to destroy the world.
Evidently. The calculus is: If you have a good brain you can destroy the world. And if you destroyed the world, then you definitely have a good brain.
The first statement implies a 'possibility' (capability) the second one gives you a certainty. Basic logic.
> I've got a rebellion, right here in me.
TeenEdge isn't a rebellion. It's a mistake.
I don't have any super powers. But sometimes I tolerate boredom for hours and do nothing about it.
Whoever said that, was probably insecure about his language skills. Kindly learn to differentiate between garrulity and accuracy.
When you cross a certain threshold, or you're born across that threshold, you'll only ever be able to relate to the villains in every novel, in every story. We like to ignore the fact that the same people whom we call geniuses or the shining beacons of mankind are the only people who can think of destroying entire nations without feeling any disgust.
Firstly, you aint Dante. Secondly, you don't have Rebellion. Thirdly, grow up please.
Often the expression 'my life sucks' is congruent to 'I suck at life'.
When I'm bored, I do something bad. Homework is bad. Therefore, I do it. Doesn't matter if it's interesting or boring, it's bad and I do it.
Friendly fire is impractical in real life, especially in melee combat. A misplaced hit (which friendly fire will always end up being) will hurt you more than it'll hurt the one you accidentally or otherwise hit.
Not really. Usually the presence of nakama only drains your own energy. Like you have not only to push your enemies around but also your friends. He's my target you piece of shit! stay away!!. Like that.
Usually it's translated to Hawk. For 'Falcon' there's the word 'Shikra' and for 'Eagle' we usually say 'Cheel'. It's only for Hawk that Shaheen is used (there's one more word for hawk).
I do worse stuff when I'm bored.
Spank? I don't know. I don't recall. But I've beaten up some guys. For the usual reasons of nakama and stuff.
it is true there are various versions of joker out there, due to there being multiple writers and stories. but in the end the versions one perfers is totally up to the reader. my fav versions of him were in the killing joke and arkham asylkum.
why i perfer the murderous psychopath. well when i was a child the comical joker was the one i loved for his pranks and the way he irritated batman, but as i grew older the comical version no longer seemed as challenging or intriguing. even when you look at the comics you will see that alot of the jokers best works shows him cynical-psychopath (not necessarily murderous), so i end up liking this version more.
well you seem like a DC fan (correct me if i am wrong) anyother heroes or villians you are preferably fond of.......
also where are you from no need to tell if you dont want. :)
wow.. your analysation of joker is really nice.
btw the comical joker and the murderous-psychopath joker (both are good) i kinda side with the psychopath over comical. in my opinion joker by heath ledger was the closest representation of joker showing both these attributes.
about the batman comics by Scott Snyder and drawn by Greg Capullo i have read some issues, but i am not current with it right now.
i know exactly what you mean batman-joker are like two peas in a pod. its really unfair to not add joker when you add batman to the list. about why i like joker so much, well there are multiple reasons for it is that he is just a simple human being (crazy i agree) yet he can bring the greatest of heroes to his knees. well about the profile pic i keep changing them every now and then for another joker pic, lately i dont stay online long enough to get to do that.(if you ever find any good joker pics for profile pic do send me :D)
[code]
Hello, dear members! Thanks for joining us! ~(=^・ω・^)ノ
The club started having interviews and we'd like you to join us!
We have all kinds of activities going on in the club, starting with fun games,
chat and ending up with serious discussions without having to deal with the forums restrictions!
Our skype group is big too, we'd love to have you aboard!
良い一日を!
All Comments (15) Comments
Desensitization, duh.
LMAO isn't that what not feeling emotion is?
And yes, empathy is a learned virtue. It doesn't really exist by default except for one's closest family.
You're comparing accidental cases with intentional ones. In one case, it's you who is destroying the world; in the other case, it's your mistake that is destroying the world. Regardless, the 'reason' for destroying the world has no bearing on your intelligence.
TeenEdge is when you show symptoms of both Shinji and Kaneki. And yes it's the gayest things ever but 12 year old girls are attracted to it.
If you're a shitlord, life can never be boring. Even boredom itself will be entertaining because you can always bombard others with your verbosity and destroy their livelihood. #iamverysmart
But if you have destroyed the world (or are destroying it) then it definitely means you have no emotions.
Look up. Stop destroying formal logic pls.
Evidently. The calculus is: If you have a good brain you can destroy the world. And if you destroyed the world, then you definitely have a good brain.
The first statement implies a 'possibility' (capability) the second one gives you a certainty. Basic logic.
> I've got a rebellion, right here in me.
TeenEdge isn't a rebellion. It's a mistake.
I don't have any super powers. But sometimes I tolerate boredom for hours and do nothing about it.
Whoever said that, was probably insecure about his language skills. Kindly learn to differentiate between garrulity and accuracy.
Firstly, you aint Dante. Secondly, you don't have Rebellion. Thirdly, grow up please.
Often the expression 'my life sucks' is congruent to 'I suck at life'.
Friendly fire is impractical in real life, especially in melee combat. A misplaced hit (which friendly fire will always end up being) will hurt you more than it'll hurt the one you accidentally or otherwise hit.
Not really. Usually the presence of nakama only drains your own energy. Like you have not only to push your enemies around but also your friends. He's my target you piece of shit! stay away!!. Like that.
I do worse stuff when I'm bored.
Spank? I don't know. I don't recall. But I've beaten up some guys. For the usual reasons of nakama and stuff.
No.
Did you kill your parents?
why i perfer the murderous psychopath. well when i was a child the comical joker was the one i loved for his pranks and the way he irritated batman, but as i grew older the comical version no longer seemed as challenging or intriguing. even when you look at the comics you will see that alot of the jokers best works shows him cynical-psychopath (not necessarily murderous), so i end up liking this version more.
well you seem like a DC fan (correct me if i am wrong) anyother heroes or villians you are preferably fond of.......
also where are you from no need to tell if you dont want. :)
btw the comical joker and the murderous-psychopath joker (both are good) i kinda side with the psychopath over comical. in my opinion joker by heath ledger was the closest representation of joker showing both these attributes.
about the batman comics by Scott Snyder and drawn by Greg Capullo i have read some issues, but i am not current with it right now.
[code] Hello, dear members! Thanks for joining us! ~(=^・ω・^)ノ The club started having interviews and we'd like you to join us! We have all kinds of activities going on in the club, starting with fun games, chat and ending up with serious discussions without having to deal with the forums restrictions! Our skype group is big too, we'd love to have you aboard! 良い一日を!