| Seemingly following a broken English and troll review epidemic( 250+) it's been suggested that "All accounts should have review approval/moderation." While there's no system suggested that could enforce this, it's thought to look unprofessional on MAL's part. Personally, I thought the review rating system did an adequate job of keeping the good reviews up front and the less quality ones buried. I mean just recently they updated that system to improve it. However that may not seem like enough. What do you think? Do you think this suggestion is redundant or something that could be helpful? Also do you find these reviews making MAL seem unprofessional? I'd advise you to share some of your thoughts in the thread itself as it appears to be a one sided conversation. |
 |
More topics from this board
Sticky: » Current EventsAstros - Dec 27, 2015 |
4 |
by Astros
»»
Jan 4, 2016 1:04 PM |
|
Poll: » SD #4 Exclude "The 'Help Identifying This ...' Thread" from MCRAstros - Dec 29, 2015 |
2 |
by Astros
»»
Dec 30, 2015 8:34 AM |
|
Poll: » SD #5 Watch Series Board - SuggestionAstros - Dec 29, 2015 |
0 |
by Astros
»»
Dec 29, 2015 8:04 AM |
|
Poll: » SD #3 Differentiate type on author pages (contains fun little quiz)Astros - Dec 29, 2015 |
0 |
by Astros
»»
Dec 29, 2015 7:31 AM |
|
Poll: » UD(Update Discussion) #1 New Combined Notifications System!Astros - Dec 29, 2015 |
0 |
by Astros
»»
Dec 29, 2015 6:56 AM |