Shinichi-Kun said:SoulEaterQUEEN said:Shinichi-Kun said:SoulEaterQUEEN said:Shinichi-Kun said:SoulEaterQUEEN said:Shinichi-Kun said:SoulEaterQUEEN said:Shinichi-Kun said:Shinichi-Kun said:Crossbell said:Shinichi-Kun said:Arrisu said:Bee-Boy said:Arrisu said:Crossbell said:I wouldn't say that aa-dono did "zero scum hunting", but instead she fell into the trap that made _Claire_ the Day 1 lynch in Shounen Crossover - all of her questions didn't lead anywhere. She was asking questions for the sake of asking them instead of finding scum.
I think it's likely with aa-dono as well, though I /am/ interested in the Jackrito wagon getting a fifth vote.
Basically what I think in a nutshell. Thanks for wording it better then I could. I'm kind of half asleep right now. :')
Also that choo choo on Jack is hmmm
Define "hmmm"
I don't particularly understand why there are so many votes on Jack as of yet. It feels too easy of a lynch?
I never like when lynches seem easy. It rubs me the wrong way.
I'm still not sure what jack has said that make's him deserving of all those votes in the first place, cause even i feel as though the train both built up too fast and is kinda an easy lynch. Cause scum can easily be hiding in that wagon as we speak.
Which scum are on the wagon, do you think?
Never implied their was scum on the train just that it was a possibility.
Everyone on that train is pretty neutral to me except tog who give's off a slight town vibe for me.
There's definitely enough substance to get better reads.
What about Shuuka's vote that came out of nowhere?
My interaction with Jack?
Jack himself?
This is her first game Not gonna judge who off of a few votes and some interactions with jack lol.
I don't see him as scum like everyone else i just get a neutral read from him.
you defended him earlier this phase, why would you defend a neutral read?
Cause i always do? Not sure how I'm suppose to answer that question lol
what's the benefit on doing this if you don't know his alignment or have a "feeling" or "suspicion" of his alignment?
Just how i play the game is there a problem with that lmao? I normally do it day 1 cause i feel like some people end up being voted off of a reason's that are really hard to defend themselves from that's why. Not sure why your questioning this now when i've done it in every game we played together.
Normally I don't care, but apparently this is one of your scum tells pointed out by Jack/Ari so I am trying to dive into your perspective on how it benefits your play as both town/scum.
What happens if you are defending scum? What happens if the reason why they can't defend themselves is because of scum play? Why do you assume that people being lynched are going to be town? Why do you have null tells on a wagon that has been going for awhile?
I need some more thoughts in this area because to me this is making me see you as being scummy.
Defending people who you don't have an indicative of their alignment as town does not make sense, you would only defend someone when scum because you want to gain a townie's trust, or by setting them up to look scummy through association.
Also the fact you seem so sure that D1 is going to result in a town lynch also tips me off that you have an idea who is town, and only scum would feel this confidence. It feels as though you are setting town up to be discouraged on lynching and ready to town shame by the end of it.
Lastly null tells gives me another tip of being scummy because scum are afraid to commit to reads until they have a plan on who to get on their side and who to frame.
Shinichi-kun said:
Not sure what they even pointed out that actually make's me trully seem scummy also if and when I do die it's gonna be funny when both their read's are thrown back at them and they get mindblown unless they are both scum cause they just be happy I died.
This guilt tripping is something that makes you look even scummier by the way. This is just a way to make you place doubt in people in lynching you as scum. If you are town here, again, I fail to see the point of how funny it would be to waste a lynch on you to prove a point.
Shinichi-kun said:
Only defend people on day 1 most of the time and if someone is scum who I'm defending oh well it happens just like how a day 1 lynch can lead to a townies death.
How are you so sure that it will lead to a townies death? If someone is being under attack, why don't you spend time analyzing the reason why they are being attacked instead of jumping to their rescue?
Shinichi-kun said:
At the same time i don't see any harm in what I'm doing because it's up to other's to follow me. Nope I defend people day 1 regardless of alignment and I understand your logic it's just kinda part of my good moral I defend people that's what I do lmao.
There's a slight panic tone here when you reiterate the point that you made twice. You are justifying your actions and trying to reaffirm that your meta is the same regardless of what alignment you are is the read i am getting here.
Shinichi-kun said:
I would have to reread everything to give you an accurate answer to the reads on that train which i will be doing tomorrow morning or soonish maybe if i'm still awake.
That's fine, I will hold you to it.
Shinichi-kun said:
Can you quote me where i said its gunranteed town will be lynched day 1 cause even I've been in games where mafia have been lynched on day 1.
Scratch out the guarantee word from this, but you have an example within your own message that just mentions townies being lynched D1.
Shinichi-kun said:
I don't plan on shaming anyone if a townie get's lynched because of their own reasoning that's on them, though not sure how I'm setting up anyone to be discouraged by defending people where I see fit.
You just said you'd defend anyone regardless of alignment, so that in itself is interrupting other people's activities to truly scum hunt and reveal the alignment of themselves/others. Your defending just serves as a distraction because it confuses town what your intentions are really are. That is the way I perceive it.
Shinichi-kun said:
Not true atleast for me cause when I finally do a read list I gotta reread everything stuff and post's so stick in my head so for me to accurately answer a read question i gotta go back and find every post at that moment so for me its easier to just say someone is a neutral read till i can atleast gather my thoughts.
Why mention your neutral reads at all then?
Shinichi-kun said:
Also I think I've hinted at my role a few times in all my post.
Really? because I can't remember except the constant screaming of "townie" as a guilt tripping method which again is scummy :/