Plot Contradictions

theaustincritic said:
While I did enjoy this short, the creators could have done a much better job at making sure this didn't contradict with the plot. Here are the contradictions:

Major Contradictions:
-In The Conqueror of Shambala, Edward was in his teenage years, so if FMA: Kids, took place in 2005, wouldn't he be in his 90's. In the short, his hair color hasn't changed at all and he looks like a middle aged man.
-If the Fullmetal Alchemist series was playing (As evident from the Conquerors of Shambala sign), why doesn't he react at all. I would find it very odd if a show even existed that showed my whole entire life.
-In the picture that looks like it has been taken recently wiith Edward, and an african american, Edward looks like a teenager.
-Where is Alphonse? I know that he could be dead, but can't they at least explain that simple question.
-Why does some of Edward's kids look like Winry and Alphonse. Winry was left in Shambala, meaning that their is no way that the the child can resemble Winry. Even if Winry did come back, that means that Alphonse had sex with Winry, meaning that they took part in Polygamy. Also, if the kids are under the age of 10, how did they even have a child, people can't have babies at age 80.

While I do love this short, as it leads to a lot of post-episodic discussion, I would of really appreciated it, if they had just left no contradictions. Otherwise, this 3-Minute short is a charming entry in the Fullmetal Alchemist series. Be sure to watch it.
-