Welcome to my profile page. Sometimes when i'm not lazy i will try to make a review.
I’m not like other critics who look under microscopic glass for all sorts of little things. Lately, I’ve been disappointed with critic reviews.
Yes I understand everyone has their own opinion and i appreciate it.
But the problem is that most critics have long forgotten how to enjoy animie. For some reason it became very popular to give bad scores.
Low scores are given even for some pathetic nonsense.
I don't know, maybe it helps to attract more attention.I don't understand one thing. if you don't like anime from the beginning, then why are you watching it?
People forcibly view all episodes, and then says what suffering it was every minute of watching.
And those people who throw after a couple of episodes and give their ratings... MAL needs to change the rating system.
Another problem is how people use the scoring system. There is a big difference when anime is a solid, masterpiece or complete disater.
First of all I think the rating from 5-1 no longer makes any sense. Imagine it’s video game scores.
When you see scores 60 is already pretty bad. 70 is no good either. No matter what score system is used, but i think you understand what i mean.
Yes in MAL score like 5 described as average. 5 is average? In my opinion it’s a pretty negative score. Because there are still all 5 scores to 10.
So how do i rate.
10-True masterpiece, everything is just amazing. But of course it doesn’t have to be the most beautiful animation, the best characters, and so on.
Usually if i really liked it, and anime has something something...you feel it.
In other words, i think the anime deserves it.
9-Close to the masterpiece, but something interrupted. Stupid or illogical ending, or some stupid decisions. Or perhaps anime is very unique and extraordinary.
8-Very good. this is usually the score i use very often. Perhaps its a high quality product, and so on. Nothing too serious but solid... Or bad and stupyd ending.
7-Fine/good. Mediocre anime. Good enough to still enjoy, but has nothing special.
6-Bad. Non-existent empty characters, anime story is real chaos, or practically does not even exist. Horrible decisions, bad animation.
Most often an anime with a poor story and character falls into this category.
5-Terrible. Bad story, music, animation, characters. Not necessarily everything has to be bad at once.The anime is so bad that you don’t know why it exists.
(2-4)-I do not use these scores. Well maybe, but very very rarely. If the anime is so bad i just don't watch it. Logical no?
Also is there a big difference between 2 and 3, 4? All those scores are horrible anyway. Descriptions of ratings scores just proves it.
Those scores are ussles. Many critics use these scores on mediocre anime. Or good, very good anime, for dumb reasons, for attention.
So many good works received bad scores. I don’t think scores like 10 should be given to everyone, but in the same way, low scores should be given responsibly.
I just stopped reading reviews from such critics.
1-No anime should get such a rating. If i see a review with such a score, i immediately ignore it. How to take it seriously?
After all, in the end, that’s just my opinion. We all have terrible tastes.
All Comments (0) Comments