Woah, Thanks! I haven't logged in for a while, and just noticed your comment just now.
Actually, I am not that into hardcore feminism, I mean, for example, on a bus without open seats, I never criticise a sitting guy who would not let a standing girl take his seat. And I don't agree on theory about 'the guy needs to pay for his girl on a date'.
Right now, I call myself a feminist for somehow, the world is still mostly dominated by men. You know that 'good cop/bad cop' idea, right?
- If equalism is encouraged and supported, then some male population might not be satisfied as for the world is publicly and secretly male-dominating. Why would they want to lose their prior power?
- If feminism is encourage, those men would be unsatisfied too, either way. But then equalism is suggested, it would sound like a more subtle solution for them and some of them might find this more acceptable.
So the idea is to balance into equalism ( zero condition ), we need two opposite value to make this happen. If not, by only equalism is encouraged suddenly, I'm afraid the 'male' value might decreases, closer to zero, but still not.
Woah, Thanks! I haven't logged in for a while, and just noticed your comment just now.
Actually, I am not that into hardcore feminism, I mean, for example, on a bus without open seats, I never criticise a sitting guy who would not let a standing girl take his seat. And I don't agree on theory about 'the guy needs to pay for his girl on a date'.
Right now, I call myself a feminist for somehow, the world is still mostly dominated by men. You know that 'good cop/bad cop' idea, right?
- If equalism is encouraged and supported, then some male population might not be satisfied as for the world is publicly and secretly male-dominating. Why would they want to lose their prior power?
- If feminism is encourage, those men would be unsatisfied too, either way. But then equalism is suggested, it would sound like a more subtle solution for them and some of them might find this more acceptable.
So the idea is to balance into equalism ( zero condition ), we need two opposite value to make this happen. If not, by only equalism is encouraged suddenly, I'm afraid the 'male' value might decreases, closer to zero, but still not.
I like your post on rape. First off, I'm a guy, and I'm generally against feminist ideals because it goes against the term equality most of the time.
I seriously liked your rant about rape though, there are many things we can tolerate in shows. I would far rather see blood, death, and other trauma as opposed to rape. It's very underhanded, and very unnecessary.
Your comment just made my day, I'm glad most people hated the concept of rape.
All Comments (3) Comments
Actually, I am not that into hardcore feminism, I mean, for example, on a bus without open seats, I never criticise a sitting guy who would not let a standing girl take his seat. And I don't agree on theory about 'the guy needs to pay for his girl on a date'.
Right now, I call myself a feminist for somehow, the world is still mostly dominated by men. You know that 'good cop/bad cop' idea, right?
- If equalism is encouraged and supported, then some male population might not be satisfied as for the world is publicly and secretly male-dominating. Why would they want to lose their prior power?
- If feminism is encourage, those men would be unsatisfied too, either way. But then equalism is suggested, it would sound like a more subtle solution for them and some of them might find this more acceptable.
So the idea is to balance into equalism ( zero condition ), we need two opposite value to make this happen. If not, by only equalism is encouraged suddenly, I'm afraid the 'male' value might decreases, closer to zero, but still not.
Actually, I am not that into hardcore feminism, I mean, for example, on a bus without open seats, I never criticise a sitting guy who would not let a standing girl take his seat. And I don't agree on theory about 'the guy needs to pay for his girl on a date'.
Right now, I call myself a feminist for somehow, the world is still mostly dominated by men. You know that 'good cop/bad cop' idea, right?
- If equalism is encouraged and supported, then some male population might not be satisfied as for the world is publicly and secretly male-dominating. Why would they want to lose their prior power?
- If feminism is encourage, those men would be unsatisfied too, either way. But then equalism is suggested, it would sound like a more subtle solution for them and some of them might find this more acceptable.
So the idea is to balance into equalism ( zero condition ), we need two opposite value to make this happen. If not, by only equalism is encouraged suddenly, I'm afraid the 'male' value might decreases, closer to zero, but still not.
I seriously liked your rant about rape though, there are many things we can tolerate in shows. I would far rather see blood, death, and other trauma as opposed to rape. It's very underhanded, and very unnecessary.
Your comment just made my day, I'm glad most people hated the concept of rape.