Game v9 - League of Legends (Good Guys Wins! THE END!)

grrr said:
So many people with blank votes.

Blonde said:
Vote: Kaito
Reason: He is always scum without fail.

Blonde said:
It's day 1, so we have no leads, so it doesn't who we go for at the moment because everyone has the same chance of being scum. So, voting for someone else will be just as "silly" because your reason would be very weak, just like the reason for voting for Kaito.

shap111 said:
Lynch:Heartman
Bit salty with grrr going full grr but ill drop this in the meantime

El-Psy_Congroo said:
Lol Grrr I feel you bro, it would so tempting to do that.

Vote: Transience

Uhm...It would be interesting to see how people will change their approach or will they?

Folie_a_deux said:

you've had enough fun for a game. This is already another game. If you're still yolo-ing, I won't be hesitant to put the nail in this time ;)

Folie_a_deux said:

I am equally suspicious of everyone right now from talking wrong to talking right to super active and playing invisible. ppl have different lvl of experiences and cannot be measured by the same rules.
But for once the inner troll in me wanna see Soren lynched before I die ;-; *cough
Especially when act serious, makes you wanna grill him so bad :'D
I'm sorry. but not sorry

Arrisu said:

Since we all know his anti-town behaviour, why not ignore it for the first phase rather then lynching him? We should be pushing onto others to try and get reactions.
IMO it's pretty much like shooting ourselves in the foot. If he flips town, it still hurts us.

grave_robber said:
Hmmm, people happily boarding the Kaito train and 2 "salt" votes on grr then some random votes. Day 1 shenanigans in full swing :)

Claiming the role "Teemo - Yordle"? That's quick! ^^
Apparently Grr reset the game so I'm not gonna keep the salt vote on him.
Vote change: CorruptedPurity
Long time no see CP, are you bad? What do you think of the events so far? =3

Jackrito said:
Well since most people seem to now be over thier rage we can get back down to playing the game from my fav part of the game day one.
It appears that this time round it is not as active which is understandable since we have already done this once so it is strange to do it again but for the good of the game we have to treat this like a normal day one and not hold grudges from the fake first day.
I will say though that people saying we should not vote someone because they is less chance of them been bad two times in a row is a bad and wrong idea. In mafia games it is possible to be mafia or 3rd party multiple times in a row so we should not leave certain people alone because they were bad last time.
Apart from that I have little to work off on a vote so I may just go for someone who is not been that active yet and see where we go from there
Vote Blonde

This is of course subject to change if a better option persents it self

KaitoKid said:

literally 1 and half pages it can't be that hard to read XD.

tinglespalace said:
Basically check every game I have played with Kaito~

tinglespalace said:
I usually don't have D1 reads on D1 lol. I tend to only notice crucial stuff when I go back later in the game to check if a person have said more suspicious stuff.. I've read through everything until now and I really think it's a case of people adoring different playstyles and discussing which is the best approach on day 1. If they carry a different opinion on the matter it doesn't immediately make them scum. I'm sorry to say it, but I don't really have a person which I'm too suspicious off. You're all evenly suspicious, although some more frustrating than the other.

I like my vote right now.. I want see Sleipnirr and see what his view is. You know I don't tend to like inactive players..

Soren said:
Doesn't make me scum. A lot of town are inactive/keeps a low profile too.
I found nothing worth commenting on because others already commented on it and there was nothing alignment indicative about it.

Pokeit said:


At the moment many people have posted small suspicious things, but Trans is the one I find most suspicious in my opinion.

I think people that made RNG votes in the beginning of the day should settle down on whoever they find the most suspicious, because there is quite a few posts that can be used to determine who's suspicious. People like heartman who voted for me in the beginning then disappeared never to justify their vote with good reasoning are suspicious in my opinion.

Heartman said:

Can you expand on your reasoning for this vote?


Transience's reaction to grr seemed over the top to me but his following response gave me the impression that he was genuinely salty. That doesn't excuse him of poor logic for that vote so unless I am convinced otherwise I will place a vote on him to break the tie.


I agree with the fact that people such as Soren, blonde and Jicko who posted at the beginning then disappeared are suspicious to me. I would like to hear more from Soren and Jicko in particular.

Change Vote: Jicko1560