Hulmy said: Ratohnhaketon said: If lolis get banned, I'm going to feel like I just watched Black Bullet episode 10 all over again. My little kokoro isn't prepared to lose its doki doki ever again -  Anime name pls It's right there, Black Bullet. |
 |
Plate said: Drawing anything should never be banned. After all, it's basically your imagination on paper. But showing others your drawings is a different matter. What if someone tried to have sex with your drawing? They'd get paper cuts on their dick. That endangers public safety. Have sex with a drawing? That's pretty stupid. I won't say it is impossible but out of millions of people in the world, who would actually do it unless they are really stupid, just wanted to try out some new experience or because it is damn low cost to do it? |
nucleon said: ZeroZephyrum said: should making music about drugs be illegal? should we arrest furries for having sex with people who pretend to be animals? is it okay to kill an enemy in a video game? all of these are fucking retarded questions the point of a ban on child pornography is to protect the child from being manipulated into doing something they don't fully understand that will have negative effects on their psychological development drawings and portrayals of fictional characters don't have human rights because they are not living beings they are drawings Not sure about drug songs in US, but your favorite country Japan will most likely ban it from broadcast in main channels, especially when the message is about promoting or enjoying it. Music describing having sex with kids could be banned too. All of that is open for interpretation, though. A lot of metal bands got in trouble for supposedly encouraging people to go out and kill people, or do drugs, or killing themselves. In each of these cases, the judges ruled that there was no direct link between the subject of the music and a crime being committed by a listener of said music. Also, do they actually encourage you to do those crimes, or discourage you from doing it by showing you how bad it is? Some artists can draw close to real human without doubt. 'Close to' is still not human, especially not if there aren't any real children used for the making of those images. Selling drawings depicting 'photos of real children' having sex WILL also be arrested in Japan. Unless they use an actual photo depicting real children in said drawing, it should be allowed. A drawing is a drawing, regardless of its contents. The acceptance around the current world is not that wide. Usually its not just about drawing but distribution and the purpose for sexual pleasure. Internet sucks from its beginning to now when it comes to age-regulation. Some people try to cover that and act like innocent or all for freedom of expression. It's just a tip of iceberg to be banned even if it's about freedom of expression. There are much more room of freedom out there. Even if you could on an age to a fictional character,m the whole argument falls flat when you become aware that these characters aren't real. They're figments of someone's imagination and in almost all cases, these character do not resemble real human beings. And regarding freedoms, if they successfully ban loli/shota porn, do you honestly think they'll stop there? As long as people believe that there is something that can encourage you to commit a crime, they won't stop until everything that they find abnormal is banned. |
| Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
| sexualized loli is h*cked up but lbr outlawing it won't do anything. outright nudity is supposed 2 b banned but cleaners on sites like f*kku fix the mosaic right up. banning it wont stop people from doing it. and like novelaer said there r loli that aren't sexualized and i'm fine with them bc they're just regular little kid characters so ¯_(ツ)_/¯ just keep that nasty fetish to yourself nd ur animoe ye |
 "madoka magica is just so ridiculous I mean who is going to believe such a shoddy melodramatic tragedy could have any commercial or moral value" |
| I don't think drawing Loli and Shots should be a crime, I do however think people that fetishize fictional children are fucked up. Like really? Maybe you need to analyze why that's so appealing to you. |
| Why? They're super cute and adorable whenever they're in a series/drawn. It's pretty messed up when they are drawn in hentais, but that's another topic - then again, it's still fiction. People can think or dream about whatever they want, just like what S&M people do within the anime/manga community. That's kinda why you see a lot of people write/draw fanfics/doujins... |
 |
| This thread title needs to be edited. I thought it was literally just "IF YOU DRAW A ANIME GIRL, SHOULD YOU GET BANNED??!??!!" - I was super confused. The title should be edited to "drawing anime lolis in a sexual manner". I'd sure as hell like it to be lmao. I highly disagree with the notion of hentai/pornography even existing in the first place, and it's only just weird knowing that people actually detail that shit out when making sexualized loli drawings. However, if they're just there for some cuteness level ratings without a sexual connotation on a show AND NOTHING MORE, I'm fine with it.  |
VariFoxSep 19, 2016 5:28 AM
 |
VariFox said: . I highly disagree with the notion of hentai/pornography even existing in the first place, please tell me this is some sort of joke.....right? or did I miss the sarcasm? |
 |
| No, because it's fiction and doesn't hurt people. Watching violent films doesn't cause people to kill others. If you can provide sufficient evidence to prove it is harmful to real world children, then I will change my mind However, an interesting point that could be argued is that lolicon hentai could inspire crimes. But does that mean anything that has potential to inspire crimes should be banned? Personally I think not. Banning a horror film because someone copied the fucked up murder in it is pretty ridiculous imo |
 |
| Drawing them for your own purpose I see no problem but you selling your lewd art book to others are turning other people into seeing children in a bad way. Baka, hentai |
  |
| Yes because loli fans are pedofiles |
 |
| watched the video only for seeing lewd pictures in there ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) but seriously, lolis aren't suppose to be sexualized. ain't interested with naked lil slut tbh... @ topic. if lewd loli picture are banned, where pedobear should satisfy their sexual desires? to real kids? |
Sorakaa said: VariFox said: . I highly disagree with the notion of hentai/pornography even existing in the first place, please tell me this is some sort of joke.....right? or did I miss the sarcasm? Please tell me this some sort of joke, right? Did I miss the sarcasm? Yeah, you kind of did. It was a joke to those guys that take wanking way too seriously. I don't like hentai or porn but I couldn't give less of a shit whether or not someone else is interested in it - that's their business. Way to spoil the joke papi (`A´) Nah, it wasn't a joke, what are you talking about? |
|
| I would be very angry at this world if they banned art. My favorite lolis are like the one in this video. |
Dementedkaliber said: is that you taking the little girl back in ur van?I would be very angry at this world if they banned art. My favorite lolis are like the one in this video. |
|
More topics from this board
» What's your ethnicity?Ejrodiew - Yesterday |
39 |
by unn
»»
8 minutes ago |
|
» Why are women wearing leggings at the gym? ( 1 2 )Zakatsuki_ - Yesterday |
95 |
by Rurihime
»»
10 minutes ago |
|
Poll: » Do you prefer food from your home country or foreign?WaffleMaster89 - 4 hours ago |
8 |
by Kwanthemaster
»»
11 minutes ago |
|
» The Halloween Candies Debate of '24 😈Kiryotsu - 8 hours ago |
10 |
by Kwanthemaster
»»
12 minutes ago |
|
» How seriously do you take your online life?RobertBobert - Oct 26 |
25 |
by Kagami
»»
13 minutes ago |