New
Jun 11, 2016 2:27 PM
#151
Soren said: Yeah, you raise a good point on his transparency being not entirely game related (especially since he's mostly answering questions instead of, y'know. Asking them) but it's still enough for a decent early game townread.Crossbell said: I can see your town reads except for the jack one. I'm not sold on town!jack just yet.I'm really tempted to townread SoulEaterQUEEN, Jackrito, and Bee-Boy all at once. I hope they're all town. |
Jun 11, 2016 2:30 PM
#152
Unvote Who said that naked unvoting was a scumtell? |
Jun 11, 2016 2:31 PM
#153
SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Crossbell said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: One of the players in my home site (the player we're sending to the Champs series, actually).Cool beans, who wrote this? Jackrito said: How is Soren going to get "town rep" from policy lynching SightlessReality?He is more used to open setups so I want to see if his playstyle will change in something he is more used to. Also not a big fan of policy lynchng someone we are all in this to have fun and enjoy the experiance, coming in with the mindset to kill someone spefic so early is just plain bad. Also this is a easy lynch target looking for some early town rep? SoulEaterQUEEN said: OK, thanks, this makes sense, especially with how I've seen Jackrito play D1s.but I am trying to break him out of his usual "mold", otherwise he will become bit of a challenge to read later in the game. Though his increased activity in this D1 intrigues me a little inside. I would say he gets town rep, because sightless is one of those lynchs where you will not be blamed if he turns bad and it will be more, blamed on Sightless playstyle. People will like the way that he is proactive in scumhunting and had clear ideas even if wrong as well . As scum they are little negatives in lynching Sightless espically if he has a good role. But you don't touch on the point on reasons/conviction for a lynch to go through. SightlessReality is a poor choice when it comes to develop a strong reason/conviction to lynch him. So with this new point, why would it be that he would gain town rep from this? The way these games have been going lately, townies can just mislynch freely and get no blame put on them because we blame people for townshaming more now. I feel scum are starting to realise as long as you put some reasoning down on why this is the best lynch at time. You will not be blamed for it and get townread instead for been proactive. You don't need as strong reasons to be town read as it used to be sadly. I also don't read conviction as a town move this early either since it is impossible to be sure, so as I said imo a sightless lynch is a good way to appear like you are scumhunting and trying to help town and not be blamed when it backfires. It is very low risk and gets a lot of reward from a scum point of view. |
Jun 11, 2016 2:32 PM
#154
Soren said: Anyone else getting the feeling that Shinichi-Kun is defending jack? Uhm i defend everyone day 1 lol, since when do u use my play style against me? Bee-Boy said: Shinichi defending Jack so early is also weird because I think everyone should just be left to do there own thing early on since it messes with the town. I do this every game though its nothing new Crossbell said: I'm really tempted to townread SoulEaterQUEEN, Jackrito, and Bee-Boy all at once. I hope they're all town. Only been 2 hours how can u have 3 town reads in my opinion. SoulEaterQUEEN said: Answering this may slightly ruin my plans, but I am trying to break him out of his usual "mold", otherwise he will become bit of a challenge to read later in the game. Though his increased activity in this D1 intrigues me a little inside. Why you trying to break someone out of their usual style Also is it me or are people getting town reads way to fast over the slighest of stuff. |
Jun 11, 2016 2:33 PM
#155
Jackrito said: Soren said: Jackrito said: Soren said: Jackrito said: If Jack and shinichi were scum I feel like jack would have made this comment in their mafia club instead. Then again, jack just commented on the souleaterqueen and bioshade coaching in the thread could be to gain town cred.Soren said: Anyone else getting the feeling that Shinichi-Kun is defending jack? Sadly he is, and I hate when people do this I can defend myself just fine and don't need the help of others. All this does is make me uneasy because it means if they flip bad it reflects badly on me. The whole buddying up thing so early is annoying to say the least. The whole buddying up thing is one of the first things, I tell scum teamates not to do when bad since I hate them to do it to each other and me. Seen too many scum teams ruined by connections and defending each other. It is more my town side I have been evolving lately, I have a lot of faith in the scum side of my game and even if I did not that is a vital part I feel. SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Soren said: Jackrito said: I've seen you tell your scum buddies that in a game I co-hosted before. But I'm pretty sure that you've been evolving your playstyle a little recently :pSoren said: Jackrito said: If Jack and shinichi were scum I feel like jack would have made this comment in their mafia club instead. Then again, jack just commented on the souleaterqueen and bioshade coaching in the thread could be to gain town cred.Soren said: Anyone else getting the feeling that Shinichi-Kun is defending jack? Sadly he is, and I hate when people do this I can defend myself just fine and don't need the help of others. All this does is make me uneasy because it means if they flip bad it reflects badly on me. The whole buddying up thing so early is annoying to say the least. The whole buddying up thing is one of the first things, I tell scum teamates not to do when bad since I hate them to do it to each other and me. Seen too many scum teams ruined by connections and defending each other. It is more my town side I have been evolving lately, I have a lot of faith in the scum side of my game and even if I did not that is a vital part I feel. Would you say you feel the most confidence in your scum game vs town game then? Jackrito said: Soren said: Jackrito said: They are free to do it ,if they feel it is within good reason. I have a slight idea what they are doing, and far too early to be worried about it for now. I would say it is a town move, I'm a hard person to lynch so not really someone scum would target day one, and she knows that I work best under pressure since it makes me more active. I feel they is other reasons behind this as well. SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Soren said: Jackrito said: This sounds too vague to me and doesn't tell me what you think of her alignment from it. So I'll rephrase my question, what does soul's pressuring of you tell you about her alignment?They are free to do it ,if they feel it is within good reason. I have a slight idea what they are doing, and far too early to be worried about it for now. I would say it is a town move, I'm a hard person to lynch so not really someone scum would target day one, and she knows that I work best under pressure since it makes me more active. I feel they is other reasons behind this as well. Oh this confidence! Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Soren said: Jackrito said: I've seen you tell your scum buddies that in a game I co-hosted before. But I'm pretty sure that you've been evolving your playstyle a little recently :pSoren said: Jackrito said: If Jack and shinichi were scum I feel like jack would have made this comment in their mafia club instead. Then again, jack just commented on the souleaterqueen and bioshade coaching in the thread could be to gain town cred.Soren said: Anyone else getting the feeling that Shinichi-Kun is defending jack? Sadly he is, and I hate when people do this I can defend myself just fine and don't need the help of others. All this does is make me uneasy because it means if they flip bad it reflects badly on me. The whole buddying up thing so early is annoying to say the least. The whole buddying up thing is one of the first things, I tell scum teamates not to do when bad since I hate them to do it to each other and me. Seen too many scum teams ruined by connections and defending each other. It is more my town side I have been evolving lately, I have a lot of faith in the scum side of my game and even if I did not that is a vital part I feel. Would you say you feel the most confidence in your scum game vs town game then? Yes I would consider it the best side of my game, because I have more of a talent for deception then investigation. So this is why lately I have been trying to improve my town side a lot more since it annoys me how bad I can be. |
Jun 11, 2016 2:35 PM
#156
Crossbell said: Soren said: Yeah, you raise a good point on his transparency being not entirely game related (especially since he's mostly answering questions instead of, y'know. Asking them) but it's still enough for a decent early game townread.Crossbell said: I'm really tempted to townread SoulEaterQUEEN, Jackrito, and Bee-Boy all at once. I hope they're all town. Not much to ask when I'm been the one asked so much at the present, I would also say I questioned Soren on his vote and bee-boy on thier views of Bio and Queen. I don't like been townread so freely though since I always see it as attempt to buddy up but I know it is your style to town read people early so less worried about it. |
Jun 11, 2016 2:37 PM
#157
Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Crossbell said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: One of the players in my home site (the player we're sending to the Champs series, actually).Cool beans, who wrote this? Jackrito said: How is Soren going to get "town rep" from policy lynching SightlessReality?He is more used to open setups so I want to see if his playstyle will change in something he is more used to. Also not a big fan of policy lynchng someone we are all in this to have fun and enjoy the experiance, coming in with the mindset to kill someone spefic so early is just plain bad. Also this is a easy lynch target looking for some early town rep? SoulEaterQUEEN said: OK, thanks, this makes sense, especially with how I've seen Jackrito play D1s.but I am trying to break him out of his usual "mold", otherwise he will become bit of a challenge to read later in the game. Though his increased activity in this D1 intrigues me a little inside. I would say he gets town rep, because sightless is one of those lynchs where you will not be blamed if he turns bad and it will be more, blamed on Sightless playstyle. People will like the way that he is proactive in scumhunting and had clear ideas even if wrong as well . As scum they are little negatives in lynching Sightless espically if he has a good role. But you don't touch on the point on reasons/conviction for a lynch to go through. SightlessReality is a poor choice when it comes to develop a strong reason/conviction to lynch him. So with this new point, why would it be that he would gain town rep from this? The way these games have been going lately, townies can just mislynch freely and get no blame put on them because we blame people for townshaming more now. I feel scum are starting to realise as long as you put some reasoning down on why this is the best lynch at time. You will not be blamed for it and get townread instead for been proactive. You don't need as strong reasons to be town read as it used to be sadly. I also don't read conviction as a town move this early either since it is impossible to be sure, so as I said imo a sightless lynch is a good way to appear like you are scumhunting and trying to help town and not be blamed when it backfires. It is very low risk and gets a lot of reward from a scum point of view. @bold Jack bring's up a good point here, cause I don't think the aggresive questioning that alice and bee boy has anything to do with them being protown. I feel as though the sightless lynch is an easy train for scum to hide on, but i can't see sorens vote being sheeped. @Bold2 That's what I'm saying like what happened to people building cases on their reads instead of just saying oh this guy is town and oh that guy is scum. |
Shinichi-KunJun 11, 2016 2:40 PM
Jun 11, 2016 2:37 PM
#158
Shinichi-kun said: I dislike to brag, but I consider one of my skills to be clearing townies with decent accuracy rates (It didn't work in Tsundere Madness because PentaFlare and Zuhra were playing good games, but check out Shounen Crossover where after the Claire lynch I cleared townies as town)Only been 2 hours how can u have 3 town reads in my opinion. |
Jun 11, 2016 2:38 PM
#159
Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Crossbell said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: One of the players in my home site (the player we're sending to the Champs series, actually).Cool beans, who wrote this? Jackrito said: How is Soren going to get "town rep" from policy lynching SightlessReality?He is more used to open setups so I want to see if his playstyle will change in something he is more used to. Also not a big fan of policy lynchng someone we are all in this to have fun and enjoy the experiance, coming in with the mindset to kill someone spefic so early is just plain bad. Also this is a easy lynch target looking for some early town rep? SoulEaterQUEEN said: OK, thanks, this makes sense, especially with how I've seen Jackrito play D1s.but I am trying to break him out of his usual "mold", otherwise he will become bit of a challenge to read later in the game. Though his increased activity in this D1 intrigues me a little inside. I would say he gets town rep, because sightless is one of those lynchs where you will not be blamed if he turns bad and it will be more, blamed on Sightless playstyle. People will like the way that he is proactive in scumhunting and had clear ideas even if wrong as well . As scum they are little negatives in lynching Sightless espically if he has a good role. But you don't touch on the point on reasons/conviction for a lynch to go through. SightlessReality is a poor choice when it comes to develop a strong reason/conviction to lynch him. So with this new point, why would it be that he would gain town rep from this? The way these games have been going lately, townies can just mislynch freely and get no blame put on them because we blame people for townshaming more now. I feel scum are starting to realise as long as you put some reasoning down on why this is the best lynch at time. You will not be blamed for it and get townread instead for been proactive. You don't need as strong reasons to be town read as it used to be sadly. I also don't read conviction as a town move this early either since it is impossible to be sure, so as I said imo a sightless lynch is a good way to appear like you are scumhunting and trying to help town and not be blamed when it backfires. It is very low risk and gets a lot of reward from a scum point of view. Not really....You aren't really scum hunting if you tunnel in one player and not pressuring back, that isn't proactively scum hunting. Based on past experienced, you won't get much out of Sightless no matter what you do, so trying to scum hunt him is bit of a joke (but at the same time bit of a risk to keep around since he is so tight lipped to be indicative on his own alignment). It's a foolish move for scum imo. If this gave you a slight scum tell on Soren, why not vote him? |
Jun 11, 2016 2:41 PM
#160
SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Soren said: Jackrito said: I've seen you tell your scum buddies that in a game I co-hosted before. But I'm pretty sure that you've been evolving your playstyle a little recently :pSoren said: Jackrito said: If Jack and shinichi were scum I feel like jack would have made this comment in their mafia club instead. Then again, jack just commented on the souleaterqueen and bioshade coaching in the thread could be to gain town cred.Soren said: Anyone else getting the feeling that Shinichi-Kun is defending jack? Sadly he is, and I hate when people do this I can defend myself just fine and don't need the help of others. All this does is make me uneasy because it means if they flip bad it reflects badly on me. The whole buddying up thing so early is annoying to say the least. The whole buddying up thing is one of the first things, I tell scum teamates not to do when bad since I hate them to do it to each other and me. Seen too many scum teams ruined by connections and defending each other. It is more my town side I have been evolving lately, I have a lot of faith in the scum side of my game and even if I did not that is a vital part I feel. SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Soren said: Jackrito said: I've seen you tell your scum buddies that in a game I co-hosted before. But I'm pretty sure that you've been evolving your playstyle a little recently :pSoren said: Jackrito said: If Jack and shinichi were scum I feel like jack would have made this comment in their mafia club instead. Then again, jack just commented on the souleaterqueen and bioshade coaching in the thread could be to gain town cred.Soren said: Anyone else getting the feeling that Shinichi-Kun is defending jack? Sadly he is, and I hate when people do this I can defend myself just fine and don't need the help of others. All this does is make me uneasy because it means if they flip bad it reflects badly on me. The whole buddying up thing so early is annoying to say the least. The whole buddying up thing is one of the first things, I tell scum teamates not to do when bad since I hate them to do it to each other and me. Seen too many scum teams ruined by connections and defending each other. It is more my town side I have been evolving lately, I have a lot of faith in the scum side of my game and even if I did not that is a vital part I feel. Would you say you feel the most confidence in your scum game vs town game then? Jackrito said: Soren said: Jackrito said: This sounds too vague to me and doesn't tell me what you think of her alignment from it. So I'll rephrase my question, what does soul's pressuring of you tell you about her alignment?They are free to do it ,if they feel it is within good reason. I have a slight idea what they are doing, and far too early to be worried about it for now. I would say it is a town move, I'm a hard person to lynch so not really someone scum would target day one, and she knows that I work best under pressure since it makes me more active. I feel they is other reasons behind this as well. SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Soren said: Jackrito said: This sounds too vague to me and doesn't tell me what you think of her alignment from it. So I'll rephrase my question, what does soul's pressuring of you tell you about her alignment?They are free to do it ,if they feel it is within good reason. I have a slight idea what they are doing, and far too early to be worried about it for now. I would say it is a town move, I'm a hard person to lynch so not really someone scum would target day one, and she knows that I work best under pressure since it makes me more active. I feel they is other reasons behind this as well. Oh this confidence! Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Soren said: Jackrito said: I've seen you tell your scum buddies that in a game I co-hosted before. But I'm pretty sure that you've been evolving your playstyle a little recently :pSoren said: Jackrito said: If Jack and shinichi were scum I feel like jack would have made this comment in their mafia club instead. Then again, jack just commented on the souleaterqueen and bioshade coaching in the thread could be to gain town cred.Soren said: Anyone else getting the feeling that Shinichi-Kun is defending jack? Sadly he is, and I hate when people do this I can defend myself just fine and don't need the help of others. All this does is make me uneasy because it means if they flip bad it reflects badly on me. The whole buddying up thing so early is annoying to say the least. The whole buddying up thing is one of the first things, I tell scum teamates not to do when bad since I hate them to do it to each other and me. Seen too many scum teams ruined by connections and defending each other. It is more my town side I have been evolving lately, I have a lot of faith in the scum side of my game and even if I did not that is a vital part I feel. Would you say you feel the most confidence in your scum game vs town game then? Yes I would consider it the best side of my game, because I have more of a talent for deception then investigation. So this is why lately I have been trying to improve my town side a lot more since it annoys me how bad I can be. lol oh that is a low move, you know my scum confidence and lynch confidence are different things, and I'm proud of both for different reasons don't try to link the two. I have said before as town you should never be mislynched since they are a lot of ways to live and prove yourself to others if that happens you are at fault no one else. When mafia and been lynched I have faith in my deception skills and been able to fake claim, also been able get people on my side, so rarely get lynched unless a power role in play. So I have confidence in not been lynched as both for them reasons. |
Jun 11, 2016 2:44 PM
#161
Crossbell said: Shinichi-kun said: I dislike to brag, but I consider one of my skills to be clearing townies with decent accuracy rates (It didn't work in Tsundere Madness because PentaFlare and Zuhra were playing good games, but check out Shounen Crossover where after the Claire lynch I cleared townies as town)Only been 2 hours how can u have 3 town reads in my opinion. Ok Ok fair enough since i've only played a few games with you and from what I've seen in shounen you are telling the truth about this. |
Jun 11, 2016 2:44 PM
#162
SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Crossbell said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: One of the players in my home site (the player we're sending to the Champs series, actually).Cool beans, who wrote this? Jackrito said: How is Soren going to get "town rep" from policy lynching SightlessReality?He is more used to open setups so I want to see if his playstyle will change in something he is more used to. Also not a big fan of policy lynchng someone we are all in this to have fun and enjoy the experiance, coming in with the mindset to kill someone spefic so early is just plain bad. Also this is a easy lynch target looking for some early town rep? SoulEaterQUEEN said: OK, thanks, this makes sense, especially with how I've seen Jackrito play D1s.but I am trying to break him out of his usual "mold", otherwise he will become bit of a challenge to read later in the game. Though his increased activity in this D1 intrigues me a little inside. I would say he gets town rep, because sightless is one of those lynchs where you will not be blamed if he turns bad and it will be more, blamed on Sightless playstyle. People will like the way that he is proactive in scumhunting and had clear ideas even if wrong as well . As scum they are little negatives in lynching Sightless espically if he has a good role. But you don't touch on the point on reasons/conviction for a lynch to go through. SightlessReality is a poor choice when it comes to develop a strong reason/conviction to lynch him. So with this new point, why would it be that he would gain town rep from this? The way these games have been going lately, townies can just mislynch freely and get no blame put on them because we blame people for townshaming more now. I feel scum are starting to realise as long as you put some reasoning down on why this is the best lynch at time. You will not be blamed for it and get townread instead for been proactive. You don't need as strong reasons to be town read as it used to be sadly. I also don't read conviction as a town move this early either since it is impossible to be sure, so as I said imo a sightless lynch is a good way to appear like you are scumhunting and trying to help town and not be blamed when it backfires. It is very low risk and gets a lot of reward from a scum point of view. Not really....You aren't really scum hunting if you tunnel in one player and not pressuring back, that isn't proactively scum hunting. Based on past experienced, you won't get much out of Sightless no matter what you do, so trying to scum hunt him is bit of a joke (but at the same time bit of a risk to keep around since he is so tight lipped to be indicative on his own alignment). It's a foolish move for scum imo. If this gave you a slight scum tell on Soren, why not vote him? Because I need a lot more then a slight scum read on someone to vote them, I don't throw votes around freely if I vote someone past the early game I normally have a decent reason. |
Jun 11, 2016 2:45 PM
#163
Jackrito said: When mafia and been lynched I have faith in my deception skills and been able to fake claim, also been able get people on my side, so rarely get lynched unless a power role in play. So I have confidence in not been lynched as both for them reasons. Tbf they're a few game's where you've been lynched despite your defense so your faith ain't always on your side it seems. |
Jun 11, 2016 2:46 PM
#164
Goodmorning Vote Crossbell I'll leave that there while I try and read all 159 messages~ |
Jun 11, 2016 2:47 PM
#165
Crossbell said: Shinichi-kun said: I dislike to brag, but I consider one of my skills to be clearing townies with decent accuracy rates (It didn't work in Tsundere Madness because PentaFlare and Zuhra were playing good games, but check out Shounen Crossover where after the Claire lynch I cleared townies as town)Only been 2 hours how can u have 3 town reads in my opinion. What do you think about soren also coming out with quick town reads? Also why do you see jack as a town read but soren see's him as a scum read? |
Jun 11, 2016 2:47 PM
#166
Jackrito said: So what you're saying here is that you do have a scum read on me?SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Crossbell said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: One of the players in my home site (the player we're sending to the Champs series, actually).Cool beans, who wrote this? Jackrito said: How is Soren going to get "town rep" from policy lynching SightlessReality?He is more used to open setups so I want to see if his playstyle will change in something he is more used to. Also not a big fan of policy lynchng someone we are all in this to have fun and enjoy the experiance, coming in with the mindset to kill someone spefic so early is just plain bad. Also this is a easy lynch target looking for some early town rep? SoulEaterQUEEN said: OK, thanks, this makes sense, especially with how I've seen Jackrito play D1s.but I am trying to break him out of his usual "mold", otherwise he will become bit of a challenge to read later in the game. Though his increased activity in this D1 intrigues me a little inside. I would say he gets town rep, because sightless is one of those lynchs where you will not be blamed if he turns bad and it will be more, blamed on Sightless playstyle. People will like the way that he is proactive in scumhunting and had clear ideas even if wrong as well . As scum they are little negatives in lynching Sightless espically if he has a good role. But you don't touch on the point on reasons/conviction for a lynch to go through. SightlessReality is a poor choice when it comes to develop a strong reason/conviction to lynch him. So with this new point, why would it be that he would gain town rep from this? The way these games have been going lately, townies can just mislynch freely and get no blame put on them because we blame people for townshaming more now. I feel scum are starting to realise as long as you put some reasoning down on why this is the best lynch at time. You will not be blamed for it and get townread instead for been proactive. You don't need as strong reasons to be town read as it used to be sadly. I also don't read conviction as a town move this early either since it is impossible to be sure, so as I said imo a sightless lynch is a good way to appear like you are scumhunting and trying to help town and not be blamed when it backfires. It is very low risk and gets a lot of reward from a scum point of view. Not really....You aren't really scum hunting if you tunnel in one player and not pressuring back, that isn't proactively scum hunting. Based on past experienced, you won't get much out of Sightless no matter what you do, so trying to scum hunt him is bit of a joke (but at the same time bit of a risk to keep around since he is so tight lipped to be indicative on his own alignment). It's a foolish move for scum imo. If this gave you a slight scum tell on Soren, why not vote him? Because I need a lot more then a slight scum read on someone to vote them, I don't throw votes around freely if I vote someone past the early game I normally have a decent reason. |
Jun 11, 2016 2:47 PM
#167
Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Crossbell said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: One of the players in my home site (the player we're sending to the Champs series, actually).Cool beans, who wrote this? Jackrito said: How is Soren going to get "town rep" from policy lynching SightlessReality?He is more used to open setups so I want to see if his playstyle will change in something he is more used to. Also not a big fan of policy lynchng someone we are all in this to have fun and enjoy the experiance, coming in with the mindset to kill someone spefic so early is just plain bad. Also this is a easy lynch target looking for some early town rep? SoulEaterQUEEN said: OK, thanks, this makes sense, especially with how I've seen Jackrito play D1s.but I am trying to break him out of his usual "mold", otherwise he will become bit of a challenge to read later in the game. Though his increased activity in this D1 intrigues me a little inside. I would say he gets town rep, because sightless is one of those lynchs where you will not be blamed if he turns bad and it will be more, blamed on Sightless playstyle. People will like the way that he is proactive in scumhunting and had clear ideas even if wrong as well . As scum they are little negatives in lynching Sightless espically if he has a good role. But you don't touch on the point on reasons/conviction for a lynch to go through. SightlessReality is a poor choice when it comes to develop a strong reason/conviction to lynch him. So with this new point, why would it be that he would gain town rep from this? The way these games have been going lately, townies can just mislynch freely and get no blame put on them because we blame people for townshaming more now. I feel scum are starting to realise as long as you put some reasoning down on why this is the best lynch at time. You will not be blamed for it and get townread instead for been proactive. You don't need as strong reasons to be town read as it used to be sadly. I also don't read conviction as a town move this early either since it is impossible to be sure, so as I said imo a sightless lynch is a good way to appear like you are scumhunting and trying to help town and not be blamed when it backfires. It is very low risk and gets a lot of reward from a scum point of view. Not really....You aren't really scum hunting if you tunnel in one player and not pressuring back, that isn't proactively scum hunting. Based on past experienced, you won't get much out of Sightless no matter what you do, so trying to scum hunt him is bit of a joke (but at the same time bit of a risk to keep around since he is so tight lipped to be indicative on his own alignment). It's a foolish move for scum imo. If this gave you a slight scum tell on Soren, why not vote him? Because I need a lot more then a slight scum read on someone to vote them, I don't throw votes around freely if I vote someone past the early game I normally have a decent reason. So being on RVS is better than voting on a slight scum read then? |
Jun 11, 2016 2:49 PM
#168
Shinichi-Kun said: Jackrito said: When mafia and been lynched I have faith in my deception skills and been able to fake claim, also been able get people on my side, so rarely get lynched unless a power role in play. So I have confidence in not been lynched as both for them reasons. Tbf they're a few game's where you've been lynched despite your defense so your faith ain't always on your side it seems. Faith is not absloute, it just means I have strong confidence in been able to talk my way out of things, they are some things you can't fight like a cop claim or any other power role. When it comes down to a battle of strict words I feel I can win apart from aganist certain people. A lot of been mafia is confidence after all if you don't believe you will win you won't. |
Jun 11, 2016 2:50 PM
#169
SoulEaterQUEEN said: ^^^^^Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Crossbell said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: One of the players in my home site (the player we're sending to the Champs series, actually).Cool beans, who wrote this? Jackrito said: How is Soren going to get "town rep" from policy lynching SightlessReality?He is more used to open setups so I want to see if his playstyle will change in something he is more used to. Also not a big fan of policy lynchng someone we are all in this to have fun and enjoy the experiance, coming in with the mindset to kill someone spefic so early is just plain bad. Also this is a easy lynch target looking for some early town rep? SoulEaterQUEEN said: OK, thanks, this makes sense, especially with how I've seen Jackrito play D1s.but I am trying to break him out of his usual "mold", otherwise he will become bit of a challenge to read later in the game. Though his increased activity in this D1 intrigues me a little inside. I would say he gets town rep, because sightless is one of those lynchs where you will not be blamed if he turns bad and it will be more, blamed on Sightless playstyle. People will like the way that he is proactive in scumhunting and had clear ideas even if wrong as well . As scum they are little negatives in lynching Sightless espically if he has a good role. But you don't touch on the point on reasons/conviction for a lynch to go through. SightlessReality is a poor choice when it comes to develop a strong reason/conviction to lynch him. So with this new point, why would it be that he would gain town rep from this? The way these games have been going lately, townies can just mislynch freely and get no blame put on them because we blame people for townshaming more now. I feel scum are starting to realise as long as you put some reasoning down on why this is the best lynch at time. You will not be blamed for it and get townread instead for been proactive. You don't need as strong reasons to be town read as it used to be sadly. I also don't read conviction as a town move this early either since it is impossible to be sure, so as I said imo a sightless lynch is a good way to appear like you are scumhunting and trying to help town and not be blamed when it backfires. It is very low risk and gets a lot of reward from a scum point of view. Not really....You aren't really scum hunting if you tunnel in one player and not pressuring back, that isn't proactively scum hunting. Based on past experienced, you won't get much out of Sightless no matter what you do, so trying to scum hunt him is bit of a joke (but at the same time bit of a risk to keep around since he is so tight lipped to be indicative on his own alignment). It's a foolish move for scum imo. If this gave you a slight scum tell on Soren, why not vote him? Because I need a lot more then a slight scum read on someone to vote them, I don't throw votes around freely if I vote someone past the early game I normally have a decent reason. So being on RVS is better than voting on a slight scum read then? |
Jun 11, 2016 2:50 PM
#170
Crossbell said: SightlessReality said: I follow most of the Champs games, so yeah.Interesting that'd you go out of your way to post the end results of another game. You certainly seem devoted to study me. A fair point but I don't see you doing doing the same for Jackrito. Though in fairness jack brings more to the table then I do in terms of reads. |
Jun 11, 2016 2:50 PM
#171
Soren said: Jackrito said: So what you're saying here is that you do have a scum read on me?SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Crossbell said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: One of the players in my home site (the player we're sending to the Champs series, actually).Cool beans, who wrote this? Jackrito said: How is Soren going to get "town rep" from policy lynching SightlessReality?He is more used to open setups so I want to see if his playstyle will change in something he is more used to. Also not a big fan of policy lynchng someone we are all in this to have fun and enjoy the experiance, coming in with the mindset to kill someone spefic so early is just plain bad. Also this is a easy lynch target looking for some early town rep? SoulEaterQUEEN said: OK, thanks, this makes sense, especially with how I've seen Jackrito play D1s.but I am trying to break him out of his usual "mold", otherwise he will become bit of a challenge to read later in the game. Though his increased activity in this D1 intrigues me a little inside. I would say he gets town rep, because sightless is one of those lynchs where you will not be blamed if he turns bad and it will be more, blamed on Sightless playstyle. People will like the way that he is proactive in scumhunting and had clear ideas even if wrong as well . As scum they are little negatives in lynching Sightless espically if he has a good role. But you don't touch on the point on reasons/conviction for a lynch to go through. SightlessReality is a poor choice when it comes to develop a strong reason/conviction to lynch him. So with this new point, why would it be that he would gain town rep from this? The way these games have been going lately, townies can just mislynch freely and get no blame put on them because we blame people for townshaming more now. I feel scum are starting to realise as long as you put some reasoning down on why this is the best lynch at time. You will not be blamed for it and get townread instead for been proactive. You don't need as strong reasons to be town read as it used to be sadly. I also don't read conviction as a town move this early either since it is impossible to be sure, so as I said imo a sightless lynch is a good way to appear like you are scumhunting and trying to help town and not be blamed when it backfires. It is very low risk and gets a lot of reward from a scum point of view. Not really....You aren't really scum hunting if you tunnel in one player and not pressuring back, that isn't proactively scum hunting. Based on past experienced, you won't get much out of Sightless no matter what you do, so trying to scum hunt him is bit of a joke (but at the same time bit of a risk to keep around since he is so tight lipped to be indicative on his own alignment). It's a foolish move for scum imo. If this gave you a slight scum tell on Soren, why not vote him? Because I need a lot more then a slight scum read on someone to vote them, I don't throw votes around freely if I vote someone past the early game I normally have a decent reason. A slight one but I like to see how a person acts over time and then view it as a whole. Rash actions only lead to mistakes. |
Jun 11, 2016 2:52 PM
#172
SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Crossbell said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: One of the players in my home site (the player we're sending to the Champs series, actually).Cool beans, who wrote this? Jackrito said: How is Soren going to get "town rep" from policy lynching SightlessReality?He is more used to open setups so I want to see if his playstyle will change in something he is more used to. Also not a big fan of policy lynchng someone we are all in this to have fun and enjoy the experiance, coming in with the mindset to kill someone spefic so early is just plain bad. Also this is a easy lynch target looking for some early town rep? SoulEaterQUEEN said: OK, thanks, this makes sense, especially with how I've seen Jackrito play D1s.but I am trying to break him out of his usual "mold", otherwise he will become bit of a challenge to read later in the game. Though his increased activity in this D1 intrigues me a little inside. I would say he gets town rep, because sightless is one of those lynchs where you will not be blamed if he turns bad and it will be more, blamed on Sightless playstyle. People will like the way that he is proactive in scumhunting and had clear ideas even if wrong as well . As scum they are little negatives in lynching Sightless espically if he has a good role. But you don't touch on the point on reasons/conviction for a lynch to go through. SightlessReality is a poor choice when it comes to develop a strong reason/conviction to lynch him. So with this new point, why would it be that he would gain town rep from this? The way these games have been going lately, townies can just mislynch freely and get no blame put on them because we blame people for townshaming more now. I feel scum are starting to realise as long as you put some reasoning down on why this is the best lynch at time. You will not be blamed for it and get townread instead for been proactive. You don't need as strong reasons to be town read as it used to be sadly. I also don't read conviction as a town move this early either since it is impossible to be sure, so as I said imo a sightless lynch is a good way to appear like you are scumhunting and trying to help town and not be blamed when it backfires. It is very low risk and gets a lot of reward from a scum point of view. Not really....You aren't really scum hunting if you tunnel in one player and not pressuring back, that isn't proactively scum hunting. Based on past experienced, you won't get much out of Sightless no matter what you do, so trying to scum hunt him is bit of a joke (but at the same time bit of a risk to keep around since he is so tight lipped to be indicative on his own alignment). It's a foolish move for scum imo. If this gave you a slight scum tell on Soren, why not vote him? Because I need a lot more then a slight scum read on someone to vote them, I don't throw votes around freely if I vote someone past the early game I normally have a decent reason. So being on RVS is better than voting on a slight scum read then? Imo yes I have a lot of time to change and reread to spot the scum slips no point throwing my votes around like a mad man, if I do that people will not listen when I am confident on someone. |
Jun 11, 2016 2:54 PM
#173
SightlessReality said: Crossbell said: SightlessReality said: Interesting that'd you go out of your way to post the end results of another game. You certainly seem devoted to study me. A fair point but I don't see you doing doing the same for Jackrito. Though in fairness jack brings more to the table then I do in terms of reads. I think u do a fine job its just jack alot more open about his reads, while you just silently gather info. |
Jun 11, 2016 2:54 PM
#174
Jackrito said: Soren said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Crossbell said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: One of the players in my home site (the player we're sending to the Champs series, actually).Cool beans, who wrote this? Jackrito said: How is Soren going to get "town rep" from policy lynching SightlessReality?He is more used to open setups so I want to see if his playstyle will change in something he is more used to. Also not a big fan of policy lynchng someone we are all in this to have fun and enjoy the experiance, coming in with the mindset to kill someone spefic so early is just plain bad. Also this is a easy lynch target looking for some early town rep? SoulEaterQUEEN said: OK, thanks, this makes sense, especially with how I've seen Jackrito play D1s.but I am trying to break him out of his usual "mold", otherwise he will become bit of a challenge to read later in the game. Though his increased activity in this D1 intrigues me a little inside. I would say he gets town rep, because sightless is one of those lynchs where you will not be blamed if he turns bad and it will be more, blamed on Sightless playstyle. People will like the way that he is proactive in scumhunting and had clear ideas even if wrong as well . As scum they are little negatives in lynching Sightless espically if he has a good role. But you don't touch on the point on reasons/conviction for a lynch to go through. SightlessReality is a poor choice when it comes to develop a strong reason/conviction to lynch him. So with this new point, why would it be that he would gain town rep from this? The way these games have been going lately, townies can just mislynch freely and get no blame put on them because we blame people for townshaming more now. I feel scum are starting to realise as long as you put some reasoning down on why this is the best lynch at time. You will not be blamed for it and get townread instead for been proactive. You don't need as strong reasons to be town read as it used to be sadly. I also don't read conviction as a town move this early either since it is impossible to be sure, so as I said imo a sightless lynch is a good way to appear like you are scumhunting and trying to help town and not be blamed when it backfires. It is very low risk and gets a lot of reward from a scum point of view. Not really....You aren't really scum hunting if you tunnel in one player and not pressuring back, that isn't proactively scum hunting. Based on past experienced, you won't get much out of Sightless no matter what you do, so trying to scum hunt him is bit of a joke (but at the same time bit of a risk to keep around since he is so tight lipped to be indicative on his own alignment). It's a foolish move for scum imo. If this gave you a slight scum tell on Soren, why not vote him? Because I need a lot more then a slight scum read on someone to vote them, I don't throw votes around freely if I vote someone past the early game I normally have a decent reason. A slight one but I like to see how a person acts over time and then view it as a whole. Rash actions only lead to mistakes. Where's the pressure in that though? if he's scum, why not add a bit of pressure with just your vote? |
Jun 11, 2016 2:54 PM
#175
Jackrito said: Soren said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Crossbell said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: One of the players in my home site (the player we're sending to the Champs series, actually).Cool beans, who wrote this? Jackrito said: How is Soren going to get "town rep" from policy lynching SightlessReality?He is more used to open setups so I want to see if his playstyle will change in something he is more used to. Also not a big fan of policy lynchng someone we are all in this to have fun and enjoy the experiance, coming in with the mindset to kill someone spefic so early is just plain bad. Also this is a easy lynch target looking for some early town rep? SoulEaterQUEEN said: OK, thanks, this makes sense, especially with how I've seen Jackrito play D1s.but I am trying to break him out of his usual "mold", otherwise he will become bit of a challenge to read later in the game. Though his increased activity in this D1 intrigues me a little inside. I would say he gets town rep, because sightless is one of those lynchs where you will not be blamed if he turns bad and it will be more, blamed on Sightless playstyle. People will like the way that he is proactive in scumhunting and had clear ideas even if wrong as well . As scum they are little negatives in lynching Sightless espically if he has a good role. But you don't touch on the point on reasons/conviction for a lynch to go through. SightlessReality is a poor choice when it comes to develop a strong reason/conviction to lynch him. So with this new point, why would it be that he would gain town rep from this? The way these games have been going lately, townies can just mislynch freely and get no blame put on them because we blame people for townshaming more now. I feel scum are starting to realise as long as you put some reasoning down on why this is the best lynch at time. You will not be blamed for it and get townread instead for been proactive. You don't need as strong reasons to be town read as it used to be sadly. I also don't read conviction as a town move this early either since it is impossible to be sure, so as I said imo a sightless lynch is a good way to appear like you are scumhunting and trying to help town and not be blamed when it backfires. It is very low risk and gets a lot of reward from a scum point of view. Not really....You aren't really scum hunting if you tunnel in one player and not pressuring back, that isn't proactively scum hunting. Based on past experienced, you won't get much out of Sightless no matter what you do, so trying to scum hunt him is bit of a joke (but at the same time bit of a risk to keep around since he is so tight lipped to be indicative on his own alignment). It's a foolish move for scum imo. If this gave you a slight scum tell on Soren, why not vote him? Because I need a lot more then a slight scum read on someone to vote them, I don't throw votes around freely if I vote someone past the early game I normally have a decent reason. A slight one but I like to see how a person acts over time and then view it as a whole. Rash actions only lead to mistakes. besides, what's wrong with making mistakes - that's how you learn. |
Jun 11, 2016 2:55 PM
#176
Shinichi-Kun said: SightlessReality said: Crossbell said: SightlessReality said: I follow most of the Champs games, so yeah.Interesting that'd you go out of your way to post the end results of another game. You certainly seem devoted to study me. A fair point but I don't see you doing doing the same for Jackrito. Though in fairness jack brings more to the table then I do in terms of reads. I think u do a fine job its just jack alot more open about his reads, while you just silently gather info. Ok I'm finding this strange, when did you become Sightless biggest fan I thought you did not like his playstyle before. What changed? or am I just crazy and you always liked them? |
Jun 11, 2016 2:56 PM
#177
Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Crossbell said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: One of the players in my home site (the player we're sending to the Champs series, actually).Cool beans, who wrote this? Jackrito said: How is Soren going to get "town rep" from policy lynching SightlessReality?He is more used to open setups so I want to see if his playstyle will change in something he is more used to. Also not a big fan of policy lynchng someone we are all in this to have fun and enjoy the experiance, coming in with the mindset to kill someone spefic so early is just plain bad. Also this is a easy lynch target looking for some early town rep? SoulEaterQUEEN said: OK, thanks, this makes sense, especially with how I've seen Jackrito play D1s.but I am trying to break him out of his usual "mold", otherwise he will become bit of a challenge to read later in the game. Though his increased activity in this D1 intrigues me a little inside. I would say he gets town rep, because sightless is one of those lynchs where you will not be blamed if he turns bad and it will be more, blamed on Sightless playstyle. People will like the way that he is proactive in scumhunting and had clear ideas even if wrong as well . As scum they are little negatives in lynching Sightless espically if he has a good role. But you don't touch on the point on reasons/conviction for a lynch to go through. SightlessReality is a poor choice when it comes to develop a strong reason/conviction to lynch him. So with this new point, why would it be that he would gain town rep from this? The way these games have been going lately, townies can just mislynch freely and get no blame put on them because we blame people for townshaming more now. I feel scum are starting to realise as long as you put some reasoning down on why this is the best lynch at time. You will not be blamed for it and get townread instead for been proactive. You don't need as strong reasons to be town read as it used to be sadly. I also don't read conviction as a town move this early either since it is impossible to be sure, so as I said imo a sightless lynch is a good way to appear like you are scumhunting and trying to help town and not be blamed when it backfires. It is very low risk and gets a lot of reward from a scum point of view. Not really....You aren't really scum hunting if you tunnel in one player and not pressuring back, that isn't proactively scum hunting. Based on past experienced, you won't get much out of Sightless no matter what you do, so trying to scum hunt him is bit of a joke (but at the same time bit of a risk to keep around since he is so tight lipped to be indicative on his own alignment). It's a foolish move for scum imo. If this gave you a slight scum tell on Soren, why not vote him? Because I need a lot more then a slight scum read on someone to vote them, I don't throw votes around freely if I vote someone past the early game I normally have a decent reason. So being on RVS is better than voting on a slight scum read then? Imo yes I have a lot of time to change and reread to spot the scum slips no point throwing my votes around like a mad man, if I do that people will not listen when I am confident on someone. but you just said you have confidence in your town/scum game so people should listen despite how many votes you throw down - no?, where did this uncertainty on your actions spawn from? |
Jun 11, 2016 2:57 PM
#178
Bee-Boy said: SoulEater and Bioshade are highly likely to not be scum together. Why do you think that? Also, what's a town block? |
Jun 11, 2016 2:57 PM
#179
SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Soren said: Jackrito said: So what you're saying here is that you do have a scum read on me?SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Crossbell said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: One of the players in my home site (the player we're sending to the Champs series, actually).Cool beans, who wrote this? Jackrito said: How is Soren going to get "town rep" from policy lynching SightlessReality?He is more used to open setups so I want to see if his playstyle will change in something he is more used to. Also not a big fan of policy lynchng someone we are all in this to have fun and enjoy the experiance, coming in with the mindset to kill someone spefic so early is just plain bad. Also this is a easy lynch target looking for some early town rep? SoulEaterQUEEN said: OK, thanks, this makes sense, especially with how I've seen Jackrito play D1s.but I am trying to break him out of his usual "mold", otherwise he will become bit of a challenge to read later in the game. Though his increased activity in this D1 intrigues me a little inside. I would say he gets town rep, because sightless is one of those lynchs where you will not be blamed if he turns bad and it will be more, blamed on Sightless playstyle. People will like the way that he is proactive in scumhunting and had clear ideas even if wrong as well . As scum they are little negatives in lynching Sightless espically if he has a good role. But you don't touch on the point on reasons/conviction for a lynch to go through. SightlessReality is a poor choice when it comes to develop a strong reason/conviction to lynch him. So with this new point, why would it be that he would gain town rep from this? The way these games have been going lately, townies can just mislynch freely and get no blame put on them because we blame people for townshaming more now. I feel scum are starting to realise as long as you put some reasoning down on why this is the best lynch at time. You will not be blamed for it and get townread instead for been proactive. You don't need as strong reasons to be town read as it used to be sadly. I also don't read conviction as a town move this early either since it is impossible to be sure, so as I said imo a sightless lynch is a good way to appear like you are scumhunting and trying to help town and not be blamed when it backfires. It is very low risk and gets a lot of reward from a scum point of view. Not really....You aren't really scum hunting if you tunnel in one player and not pressuring back, that isn't proactively scum hunting. Based on past experienced, you won't get much out of Sightless no matter what you do, so trying to scum hunt him is bit of a joke (but at the same time bit of a risk to keep around since he is so tight lipped to be indicative on his own alignment). It's a foolish move for scum imo. If this gave you a slight scum tell on Soren, why not vote him? Because I need a lot more then a slight scum read on someone to vote them, I don't throw votes around freely if I vote someone past the early game I normally have a decent reason. A slight one but I like to see how a person acts over time and then view it as a whole. Rash actions only lead to mistakes. besides, what's wrong with making mistakes - that's how you learn. Mistakes are the best friend of the scum team if I mess up that will be used aganist me in the late game, I would rather not give scum a reason to get town to mislynch me because I did a vote without thinking I did that too much in my last game. |
Jun 11, 2016 2:59 PM
#180
SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Soren said: Jackrito said: So what you're saying here is that you do have a scum read on me?SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Crossbell said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: One of the players in my home site (the player we're sending to the Champs series, actually).Cool beans, who wrote this? Jackrito said: How is Soren going to get "town rep" from policy lynching SightlessReality?He is more used to open setups so I want to see if his playstyle will change in something he is more used to. Also not a big fan of policy lynchng someone we are all in this to have fun and enjoy the experiance, coming in with the mindset to kill someone spefic so early is just plain bad. Also this is a easy lynch target looking for some early town rep? SoulEaterQUEEN said: OK, thanks, this makes sense, especially with how I've seen Jackrito play D1s.but I am trying to break him out of his usual "mold", otherwise he will become bit of a challenge to read later in the game. Though his increased activity in this D1 intrigues me a little inside. I would say he gets town rep, because sightless is one of those lynchs where you will not be blamed if he turns bad and it will be more, blamed on Sightless playstyle. People will like the way that he is proactive in scumhunting and had clear ideas even if wrong as well . As scum they are little negatives in lynching Sightless espically if he has a good role. But you don't touch on the point on reasons/conviction for a lynch to go through. SightlessReality is a poor choice when it comes to develop a strong reason/conviction to lynch him. So with this new point, why would it be that he would gain town rep from this? The way these games have been going lately, townies can just mislynch freely and get no blame put on them because we blame people for townshaming more now. I feel scum are starting to realise as long as you put some reasoning down on why this is the best lynch at time. You will not be blamed for it and get townread instead for been proactive. You don't need as strong reasons to be town read as it used to be sadly. I also don't read conviction as a town move this early either since it is impossible to be sure, so as I said imo a sightless lynch is a good way to appear like you are scumhunting and trying to help town and not be blamed when it backfires. It is very low risk and gets a lot of reward from a scum point of view. Not really....You aren't really scum hunting if you tunnel in one player and not pressuring back, that isn't proactively scum hunting. Based on past experienced, you won't get much out of Sightless no matter what you do, so trying to scum hunt him is bit of a joke (but at the same time bit of a risk to keep around since he is so tight lipped to be indicative on his own alignment). It's a foolish move for scum imo. If this gave you a slight scum tell on Soren, why not vote him? Because I need a lot more then a slight scum read on someone to vote them, I don't throw votes around freely if I vote someone past the early game I normally have a decent reason. A slight one but I like to see how a person acts over time and then view it as a whole. Rash actions only lead to mistakes. Where's the pressure in that though? if he's scum, why not add a bit of pressure with just your vote? You know I don't pressure people as hardcore as others do and they are other ways to pressure someone without voting. |
Jun 11, 2016 3:00 PM
#181
Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Soren said: Jackrito said: So what you're saying here is that you do have a scum read on me?SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Crossbell said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: One of the players in my home site (the player we're sending to the Champs series, actually).Cool beans, who wrote this? Jackrito said: How is Soren going to get "town rep" from policy lynching SightlessReality?He is more used to open setups so I want to see if his playstyle will change in something he is more used to. Also not a big fan of policy lynchng someone we are all in this to have fun and enjoy the experiance, coming in with the mindset to kill someone spefic so early is just plain bad. Also this is a easy lynch target looking for some early town rep? SoulEaterQUEEN said: OK, thanks, this makes sense, especially with how I've seen Jackrito play D1s.but I am trying to break him out of his usual "mold", otherwise he will become bit of a challenge to read later in the game. Though his increased activity in this D1 intrigues me a little inside. I would say he gets town rep, because sightless is one of those lynchs where you will not be blamed if he turns bad and it will be more, blamed on Sightless playstyle. People will like the way that he is proactive in scumhunting and had clear ideas even if wrong as well . As scum they are little negatives in lynching Sightless espically if he has a good role. But you don't touch on the point on reasons/conviction for a lynch to go through. SightlessReality is a poor choice when it comes to develop a strong reason/conviction to lynch him. So with this new point, why would it be that he would gain town rep from this? The way these games have been going lately, townies can just mislynch freely and get no blame put on them because we blame people for townshaming more now. I feel scum are starting to realise as long as you put some reasoning down on why this is the best lynch at time. You will not be blamed for it and get townread instead for been proactive. You don't need as strong reasons to be town read as it used to be sadly. I also don't read conviction as a town move this early either since it is impossible to be sure, so as I said imo a sightless lynch is a good way to appear like you are scumhunting and trying to help town and not be blamed when it backfires. It is very low risk and gets a lot of reward from a scum point of view. Not really....You aren't really scum hunting if you tunnel in one player and not pressuring back, that isn't proactively scum hunting. Based on past experienced, you won't get much out of Sightless no matter what you do, so trying to scum hunt him is bit of a joke (but at the same time bit of a risk to keep around since he is so tight lipped to be indicative on his own alignment). It's a foolish move for scum imo. If this gave you a slight scum tell on Soren, why not vote him? Because I need a lot more then a slight scum read on someone to vote them, I don't throw votes around freely if I vote someone past the early game I normally have a decent reason. A slight one but I like to see how a person acts over time and then view it as a whole. Rash actions only lead to mistakes. besides, what's wrong with making mistakes - that's how you learn. Mistakes are the best friend of the scum team if I mess up that will be used aganist me in the late game, I would rather not give scum a reason to get town to mislynch me because I did a vote without thinking I did that too much in my last game. That;s why town has to unify to see passed opportunistic scum play |
Jun 11, 2016 3:00 PM
#182
Jackrito said: Shinichi-Kun said: SightlessReality said: Crossbell said: SightlessReality said: I follow most of the Champs games, so yeah.Interesting that'd you go out of your way to post the end results of another game. You certainly seem devoted to study me. A fair point but I don't see you doing doing the same for Jackrito. Though in fairness jack brings more to the table then I do in terms of reads. I think u do a fine job its just jack alot more open about his reads, while you just silently gather info. Ok I'm finding this strange, when did you become Sightless biggest fan I thought you did not like his playstyle before. What changed? or am I just crazy and you always liked them? At first it annoyed by but after a few games I kinda understand where he comes from with his palystyle and tbh it works really well when hes town, though i've never seen him as scum so i'm always skeptical. |
Jun 11, 2016 3:00 PM
#183
Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Soren said: Jackrito said: So what you're saying here is that you do have a scum read on me?SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Crossbell said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: One of the players in my home site (the player we're sending to the Champs series, actually).Cool beans, who wrote this? Jackrito said: How is Soren going to get "town rep" from policy lynching SightlessReality?He is more used to open setups so I want to see if his playstyle will change in something he is more used to. Also not a big fan of policy lynchng someone we are all in this to have fun and enjoy the experiance, coming in with the mindset to kill someone spefic so early is just plain bad. Also this is a easy lynch target looking for some early town rep? SoulEaterQUEEN said: OK, thanks, this makes sense, especially with how I've seen Jackrito play D1s.but I am trying to break him out of his usual "mold", otherwise he will become bit of a challenge to read later in the game. Though his increased activity in this D1 intrigues me a little inside. I would say he gets town rep, because sightless is one of those lynchs where you will not be blamed if he turns bad and it will be more, blamed on Sightless playstyle. People will like the way that he is proactive in scumhunting and had clear ideas even if wrong as well . As scum they are little negatives in lynching Sightless espically if he has a good role. But you don't touch on the point on reasons/conviction for a lynch to go through. SightlessReality is a poor choice when it comes to develop a strong reason/conviction to lynch him. So with this new point, why would it be that he would gain town rep from this? The way these games have been going lately, townies can just mislynch freely and get no blame put on them because we blame people for townshaming more now. I feel scum are starting to realise as long as you put some reasoning down on why this is the best lynch at time. You will not be blamed for it and get townread instead for been proactive. You don't need as strong reasons to be town read as it used to be sadly. I also don't read conviction as a town move this early either since it is impossible to be sure, so as I said imo a sightless lynch is a good way to appear like you are scumhunting and trying to help town and not be blamed when it backfires. It is very low risk and gets a lot of reward from a scum point of view. Not really....You aren't really scum hunting if you tunnel in one player and not pressuring back, that isn't proactively scum hunting. Based on past experienced, you won't get much out of Sightless no matter what you do, so trying to scum hunt him is bit of a joke (but at the same time bit of a risk to keep around since he is so tight lipped to be indicative on his own alignment). It's a foolish move for scum imo. If this gave you a slight scum tell on Soren, why not vote him? Because I need a lot more then a slight scum read on someone to vote them, I don't throw votes around freely if I vote someone past the early game I normally have a decent reason. A slight one but I like to see how a person acts over time and then view it as a whole. Rash actions only lead to mistakes. Where's the pressure in that though? if he's scum, why not add a bit of pressure with just your vote? You know I don't pressure people as hardcore as others do and they are other ways to pressure someone without voting. but you told me in a past game that you don't like to pressure people because of your passive playstyle so you just use your vote. but I don't see you using your vote here yet |
Jun 11, 2016 3:01 PM
#184
aa-dono said: Bee-Boy said: SoulEater and Bioshade are highly likely to not be scum together. Why do you think that? Also, what's a town block? From what i've read and seen it's basically a small group of people that work together or something like that? |
Jun 11, 2016 3:01 PM
#185
Shinichi-Kun said: SightlessReality said: Crossbell said: SightlessReality said: I follow most of the Champs games, so yeah.Interesting that'd you go out of your way to post the end results of another game. You certainly seem devoted to study me. A fair point but I don't see you doing doing the same for Jackrito. Though in fairness jack brings more to the table then I do in terms of reads. I think u do a fine job its just jack alot more open about his reads, while you just silently gather info. Ah, that's not really what I meant exactly. My response to Cross is more to show Jack gives more to work with to read them as either town as scum. While I on the other give almost nothing away. So it would make more sense for Cross to bring up off site games involving me then for Jack. |
Jun 11, 2016 3:01 PM
#186
Shinichi-Kun said: Jackrito said: Shinichi-Kun said: SightlessReality said: Crossbell said: SightlessReality said: I follow most of the Champs games, so yeah.Interesting that'd you go out of your way to post the end results of another game. You certainly seem devoted to study me. A fair point but I don't see you doing doing the same for Jackrito. Though in fairness jack brings more to the table then I do in terms of reads. I think u do a fine job its just jack alot more open about his reads, while you just silently gather info. Ok I'm finding this strange, when did you become Sightless biggest fan I thought you did not like his playstyle before. What changed? or am I just crazy and you always liked them? At first it annoyed by but after a few games I kinda understand where he comes from with his palystyle and tbh it works really well when hes town, though i've never seen him as scum so i'm always skeptical. can you elaborate here, what do you think his playstyle involves and why does it work well when hes town? |
Jun 11, 2016 3:03 PM
#187
SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Crossbell said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: One of the players in my home site (the player we're sending to the Champs series, actually).Cool beans, who wrote this? Jackrito said: How is Soren going to get "town rep" from policy lynching SightlessReality?He is more used to open setups so I want to see if his playstyle will change in something he is more used to. Also not a big fan of policy lynchng someone we are all in this to have fun and enjoy the experiance, coming in with the mindset to kill someone spefic so early is just plain bad. Also this is a easy lynch target looking for some early town rep? SoulEaterQUEEN said: OK, thanks, this makes sense, especially with how I've seen Jackrito play D1s.but I am trying to break him out of his usual "mold", otherwise he will become bit of a challenge to read later in the game. Though his increased activity in this D1 intrigues me a little inside. I would say he gets town rep, because sightless is one of those lynchs where you will not be blamed if he turns bad and it will be more, blamed on Sightless playstyle. People will like the way that he is proactive in scumhunting and had clear ideas even if wrong as well . As scum they are little negatives in lynching Sightless espically if he has a good role. But you don't touch on the point on reasons/conviction for a lynch to go through. SightlessReality is a poor choice when it comes to develop a strong reason/conviction to lynch him. So with this new point, why would it be that he would gain town rep from this? The way these games have been going lately, townies can just mislynch freely and get no blame put on them because we blame people for townshaming more now. I feel scum are starting to realise as long as you put some reasoning down on why this is the best lynch at time. You will not be blamed for it and get townread instead for been proactive. You don't need as strong reasons to be town read as it used to be sadly. I also don't read conviction as a town move this early either since it is impossible to be sure, so as I said imo a sightless lynch is a good way to appear like you are scumhunting and trying to help town and not be blamed when it backfires. It is very low risk and gets a lot of reward from a scum point of view. Not really....You aren't really scum hunting if you tunnel in one player and not pressuring back, that isn't proactively scum hunting. Based on past experienced, you won't get much out of Sightless no matter what you do, so trying to scum hunt him is bit of a joke (but at the same time bit of a risk to keep around since he is so tight lipped to be indicative on his own alignment). It's a foolish move for scum imo. If this gave you a slight scum tell on Soren, why not vote him? Because I need a lot more then a slight scum read on someone to vote them, I don't throw votes around freely if I vote someone past the early game I normally have a decent reason. So being on RVS is better than voting on a slight scum read then? Imo yes I have a lot of time to change and reread to spot the scum slips no point throwing my votes around like a mad man, if I do that people will not listen when I am confident on someone. but you just said you have confidence in your town/scum game so people should listen despite how many votes you throw down - no?, where did this uncertainty on your actions spawn from? I never said I have confidence in my town game I just said I have confidence in not been lynched as town. They is a lot more to town game then that, I could find the whole scum team and have no one listen because I messed up too much. This comes more down to a belief of playstyle and what works best this is what I do not the best way but how I work trying to change it to be better but I have firm belief in parts of it. The whole voting with purpose is a big one. |
Jun 11, 2016 3:04 PM
#188
Shinichi-Kun said: Jackrito said: Shinichi-Kun said: SightlessReality said: Crossbell said: SightlessReality said: I follow most of the Champs games, so yeah.Interesting that'd you go out of your way to post the end results of another game. You certainly seem devoted to study me. A fair point but I don't see you doing doing the same for Jackrito. Though in fairness jack brings more to the table then I do in terms of reads. I think u do a fine job its just jack alot more open about his reads, while you just silently gather info. Ok I'm finding this strange, when did you become Sightless biggest fan I thought you did not like his playstyle before. What changed? or am I just crazy and you always liked them? At first it annoyed by but after a few games I kinda understand where he comes from with his palystyle and tbh it works really well when hes town, though i've never seen him as scum so i'm always skeptical. Please explain to me a game when it worked well. |
Jun 11, 2016 3:06 PM
#189
SightlessReality said: I followed Jack's Champs game as well, actually!A fair point but I don't see you doing doing the same for Jackrito. Though in fairness jack brings more to the table then I do in terms of reads. That answer was more of a tongue-in-cheek response as to what I would be most afraid of seeing in this game (which would be you winning this game as scum). |
Jun 11, 2016 3:06 PM
#190
Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Crossbell said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: One of the players in my home site (the player we're sending to the Champs series, actually).Cool beans, who wrote this? Jackrito said: How is Soren going to get "town rep" from policy lynching SightlessReality?He is more used to open setups so I want to see if his playstyle will change in something he is more used to. Also not a big fan of policy lynchng someone we are all in this to have fun and enjoy the experiance, coming in with the mindset to kill someone spefic so early is just plain bad. Also this is a easy lynch target looking for some early town rep? SoulEaterQUEEN said: OK, thanks, this makes sense, especially with how I've seen Jackrito play D1s.but I am trying to break him out of his usual "mold", otherwise he will become bit of a challenge to read later in the game. Though his increased activity in this D1 intrigues me a little inside. I would say he gets town rep, because sightless is one of those lynchs where you will not be blamed if he turns bad and it will be more, blamed on Sightless playstyle. People will like the way that he is proactive in scumhunting and had clear ideas even if wrong as well . As scum they are little negatives in lynching Sightless espically if he has a good role. But you don't touch on the point on reasons/conviction for a lynch to go through. SightlessReality is a poor choice when it comes to develop a strong reason/conviction to lynch him. So with this new point, why would it be that he would gain town rep from this? The way these games have been going lately, townies can just mislynch freely and get no blame put on them because we blame people for townshaming more now. I feel scum are starting to realise as long as you put some reasoning down on why this is the best lynch at time. You will not be blamed for it and get townread instead for been proactive. You don't need as strong reasons to be town read as it used to be sadly. I also don't read conviction as a town move this early either since it is impossible to be sure, so as I said imo a sightless lynch is a good way to appear like you are scumhunting and trying to help town and not be blamed when it backfires. It is very low risk and gets a lot of reward from a scum point of view. Not really....You aren't really scum hunting if you tunnel in one player and not pressuring back, that isn't proactively scum hunting. Based on past experienced, you won't get much out of Sightless no matter what you do, so trying to scum hunt him is bit of a joke (but at the same time bit of a risk to keep around since he is so tight lipped to be indicative on his own alignment). It's a foolish move for scum imo. If this gave you a slight scum tell on Soren, why not vote him? Because I need a lot more then a slight scum read on someone to vote them, I don't throw votes around freely if I vote someone past the early game I normally have a decent reason. So being on RVS is better than voting on a slight scum read then? Imo yes I have a lot of time to change and reread to spot the scum slips no point throwing my votes around like a mad man, if I do that people will not listen when I am confident on someone. but you just said you have confidence in your town/scum game so people should listen despite how many votes you throw down - no?, where did this uncertainty on your actions spawn from? I never said I have confidence in my town game I just said I have confidence in not been lynched as town. They is a lot more to town game then that, I could find the whole scum team and have no one listen because I messed up too much. This comes more down to a belief of playstyle and what works best this is what I do not the best way but how I work trying to change it to be better but I have firm belief in parts of it. The whole voting with purpose is a big one. I see you mess up as town with a bunch of mislynches but people still listen to you anyway, so why has this become a reason now to not vote for someone you see as slightly scummy? do you not want town to move outside of rvs? |
Jun 11, 2016 3:06 PM
#191
SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Soren said: Jackrito said: So what you're saying here is that you do have a scum read on me?SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Crossbell said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: One of the players in my home site (the player we're sending to the Champs series, actually).Cool beans, who wrote this? Jackrito said: How is Soren going to get "town rep" from policy lynching SightlessReality?He is more used to open setups so I want to see if his playstyle will change in something he is more used to. Also not a big fan of policy lynchng someone we are all in this to have fun and enjoy the experiance, coming in with the mindset to kill someone spefic so early is just plain bad. Also this is a easy lynch target looking for some early town rep? SoulEaterQUEEN said: OK, thanks, this makes sense, especially with how I've seen Jackrito play D1s.but I am trying to break him out of his usual "mold", otherwise he will become bit of a challenge to read later in the game. Though his increased activity in this D1 intrigues me a little inside. I would say he gets town rep, because sightless is one of those lynchs where you will not be blamed if he turns bad and it will be more, blamed on Sightless playstyle. People will like the way that he is proactive in scumhunting and had clear ideas even if wrong as well . As scum they are little negatives in lynching Sightless espically if he has a good role. But you don't touch on the point on reasons/conviction for a lynch to go through. SightlessReality is a poor choice when it comes to develop a strong reason/conviction to lynch him. So with this new point, why would it be that he would gain town rep from this? The way these games have been going lately, townies can just mislynch freely and get no blame put on them because we blame people for townshaming more now. I feel scum are starting to realise as long as you put some reasoning down on why this is the best lynch at time. You will not be blamed for it and get townread instead for been proactive. You don't need as strong reasons to be town read as it used to be sadly. I also don't read conviction as a town move this early either since it is impossible to be sure, so as I said imo a sightless lynch is a good way to appear like you are scumhunting and trying to help town and not be blamed when it backfires. It is very low risk and gets a lot of reward from a scum point of view. Not really....You aren't really scum hunting if you tunnel in one player and not pressuring back, that isn't proactively scum hunting. Based on past experienced, you won't get much out of Sightless no matter what you do, so trying to scum hunt him is bit of a joke (but at the same time bit of a risk to keep around since he is so tight lipped to be indicative on his own alignment). It's a foolish move for scum imo. If this gave you a slight scum tell on Soren, why not vote him? Because I need a lot more then a slight scum read on someone to vote them, I don't throw votes around freely if I vote someone past the early game I normally have a decent reason. A slight one but I like to see how a person acts over time and then view it as a whole. Rash actions only lead to mistakes. Where's the pressure in that though? if he's scum, why not add a bit of pressure with just your vote? You know I don't pressure people as hardcore as others do and they are other ways to pressure someone without voting. but you told me in a past game that you don't like to pressure people because of your passive playstyle so you just use your vote. but I don't see you using your vote here yet I also told you I vote with purpose, which i don't have enough of a scum read to do yet. Also the whole not doing more to pressure people. is something I'm trying to change. A passive playstyle is useless I use it well. |
Jun 11, 2016 3:07 PM
#192
Also I feel compelled to bring up something from the rules: Chione said: Each Twilight phase will last for 24 hours. This occurs when there's a tie between two players at the end of the Day phase and occurs before the Night phase starts. During the twilight you discuss and vote. You can only vote for: Each of the players that have been in the tie, no lynch and double lynch (lynch both players). If a tie should occur at the end of this phase, then the person to be lynched will be RNGed between the two lynch candidates. We should be double lynching every single Day. This is a powerful weapon given to us. |
Jun 11, 2016 3:09 PM
#193
Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Soren said: Jackrito said: So what you're saying here is that you do have a scum read on me?SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Crossbell said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: One of the players in my home site (the player we're sending to the Champs series, actually).Cool beans, who wrote this? Jackrito said: How is Soren going to get "town rep" from policy lynching SightlessReality?He is more used to open setups so I want to see if his playstyle will change in something he is more used to. Also not a big fan of policy lynchng someone we are all in this to have fun and enjoy the experiance, coming in with the mindset to kill someone spefic so early is just plain bad. Also this is a easy lynch target looking for some early town rep? SoulEaterQUEEN said: OK, thanks, this makes sense, especially with how I've seen Jackrito play D1s.but I am trying to break him out of his usual "mold", otherwise he will become bit of a challenge to read later in the game. Though his increased activity in this D1 intrigues me a little inside. I would say he gets town rep, because sightless is one of those lynchs where you will not be blamed if he turns bad and it will be more, blamed on Sightless playstyle. People will like the way that he is proactive in scumhunting and had clear ideas even if wrong as well . As scum they are little negatives in lynching Sightless espically if he has a good role. But you don't touch on the point on reasons/conviction for a lynch to go through. SightlessReality is a poor choice when it comes to develop a strong reason/conviction to lynch him. So with this new point, why would it be that he would gain town rep from this? The way these games have been going lately, townies can just mislynch freely and get no blame put on them because we blame people for townshaming more now. I feel scum are starting to realise as long as you put some reasoning down on why this is the best lynch at time. You will not be blamed for it and get townread instead for been proactive. You don't need as strong reasons to be town read as it used to be sadly. I also don't read conviction as a town move this early either since it is impossible to be sure, so as I said imo a sightless lynch is a good way to appear like you are scumhunting and trying to help town and not be blamed when it backfires. It is very low risk and gets a lot of reward from a scum point of view. Not really....You aren't really scum hunting if you tunnel in one player and not pressuring back, that isn't proactively scum hunting. Based on past experienced, you won't get much out of Sightless no matter what you do, so trying to scum hunt him is bit of a joke (but at the same time bit of a risk to keep around since he is so tight lipped to be indicative on his own alignment). It's a foolish move for scum imo. If this gave you a slight scum tell on Soren, why not vote him? Because I need a lot more then a slight scum read on someone to vote them, I don't throw votes around freely if I vote someone past the early game I normally have a decent reason. A slight one but I like to see how a person acts over time and then view it as a whole. Rash actions only lead to mistakes. Where's the pressure in that though? if he's scum, why not add a bit of pressure with just your vote? You know I don't pressure people as hardcore as others do and they are other ways to pressure someone without voting. but you told me in a past game that you don't like to pressure people because of your passive playstyle so you just use your vote. but I don't see you using your vote here yet I also told you I vote with purpose, which i don't have enough of a scum read to do yet. Also the whole not doing more to pressure people. is something I'm trying to change. A passive playstyle is useless I use it well. I fail to see the purpose in your rvs vote though, so why did you vote here? |
Jun 11, 2016 3:10 PM
#194
The additional 24 hours is also excellent, which means that we can treat each Day as a 48 hour one. Ish? We won't have a lot of things to discuss since we will probably double lynch. |
Jun 11, 2016 3:10 PM
#195
Crossbell said: Also I feel compelled to bring up something from the rules: Chione said: Each Twilight phase will last for 24 hours. This occurs when there's a tie between two players at the end of the Day phase and occurs before the Night phase starts. During the twilight you discuss and vote. You can only vote for: Each of the players that have been in the tie, no lynch and double lynch (lynch both players). If a tie should occur at the end of this phase, then the person to be lynched will be RNGed between the two lynch candidates. We should be double lynching every single Day. This is a powerful weapon given to us. yeah sure but don't forget that scum can win when there's 6 townies alive and 3 scum alive >.> so I rather not use this weapon so freely. |
Jun 11, 2016 3:10 PM
#196
SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Crossbell said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: One of the players in my home site (the player we're sending to the Champs series, actually).Cool beans, who wrote this? Jackrito said: How is Soren going to get "town rep" from policy lynching SightlessReality?He is more used to open setups so I want to see if his playstyle will change in something he is more used to. Also not a big fan of policy lynchng someone we are all in this to have fun and enjoy the experiance, coming in with the mindset to kill someone spefic so early is just plain bad. Also this is a easy lynch target looking for some early town rep? SoulEaterQUEEN said: OK, thanks, this makes sense, especially with how I've seen Jackrito play D1s.but I am trying to break him out of his usual "mold", otherwise he will become bit of a challenge to read later in the game. Though his increased activity in this D1 intrigues me a little inside. I would say he gets town rep, because sightless is one of those lynchs where you will not be blamed if he turns bad and it will be more, blamed on Sightless playstyle. People will like the way that he is proactive in scumhunting and had clear ideas even if wrong as well . As scum they are little negatives in lynching Sightless espically if he has a good role. But you don't touch on the point on reasons/conviction for a lynch to go through. SightlessReality is a poor choice when it comes to develop a strong reason/conviction to lynch him. So with this new point, why would it be that he would gain town rep from this? The way these games have been going lately, townies can just mislynch freely and get no blame put on them because we blame people for townshaming more now. I feel scum are starting to realise as long as you put some reasoning down on why this is the best lynch at time. You will not be blamed for it and get townread instead for been proactive. You don't need as strong reasons to be town read as it used to be sadly. I also don't read conviction as a town move this early either since it is impossible to be sure, so as I said imo a sightless lynch is a good way to appear like you are scumhunting and trying to help town and not be blamed when it backfires. It is very low risk and gets a lot of reward from a scum point of view. Not really....You aren't really scum hunting if you tunnel in one player and not pressuring back, that isn't proactively scum hunting. Based on past experienced, you won't get much out of Sightless no matter what you do, so trying to scum hunt him is bit of a joke (but at the same time bit of a risk to keep around since he is so tight lipped to be indicative on his own alignment). It's a foolish move for scum imo. If this gave you a slight scum tell on Soren, why not vote him? Because I need a lot more then a slight scum read on someone to vote them, I don't throw votes around freely if I vote someone past the early game I normally have a decent reason. So being on RVS is better than voting on a slight scum read then? Imo yes I have a lot of time to change and reread to spot the scum slips no point throwing my votes around like a mad man, if I do that people will not listen when I am confident on someone. but you just said you have confidence in your town/scum game so people should listen despite how many votes you throw down - no?, where did this uncertainty on your actions spawn from? I never said I have confidence in my town game I just said I have confidence in not been lynched as town. They is a lot more to town game then that, I could find the whole scum team and have no one listen because I messed up too much. This comes more down to a belief of playstyle and what works best this is what I do not the best way but how I work trying to change it to be better but I have firm belief in parts of it. The whole voting with purpose is a big one. I see you mess up as town with a bunch of mislynches but people still listen to you anyway, so why has this become a reason now to not vote for someone you see as slightly scummy? do you not want town to move outside of rvs? You have seen me mess up lynchs in the later game and how badly I messed up in the last game is making me more aware of myself and not to act without thinking. I have no solid day one plays either this is the most I have ever posed on day one my true skill comes out on day 3 or later normally. I would say we are out of RVS already with the pressure on me. I like to have more of the cast appear, before I do though. Also any vote I do on Soren now would be more seen out of spite, then pressure anyway so it loses the effect. |
Jun 11, 2016 3:12 PM
#197
Shinichi-kun said: It shows that he is thinking along the same lines as I am, which is all well and good, though I'm hesitant on townreading him early because I don't know his town game.What do you think about soren also coming out with quick town reads? Also why do you see jack as a town read but soren see's him as a scum read? I'm seeing Jackrito as a town read because I get the sense that he actually believes what he is saying. |
Jun 11, 2016 3:13 PM
#198
Double lynching is a double edge sword. It's just as likely to hit town as it is to hit scum. Actually more like to hit town. |
Jun 11, 2016 3:13 PM
#199
SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Soren said: Jackrito said: So what you're saying here is that you do have a scum read on me?SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: Jackrito said: Crossbell said: SoulEaterQUEEN said: One of the players in my home site (the player we're sending to the Champs series, actually).Cool beans, who wrote this? Jackrito said: How is Soren going to get "town rep" from policy lynching SightlessReality?He is more used to open setups so I want to see if his playstyle will change in something he is more used to. Also not a big fan of policy lynchng someone we are all in this to have fun and enjoy the experiance, coming in with the mindset to kill someone spefic so early is just plain bad. Also this is a easy lynch target looking for some early town rep? SoulEaterQUEEN said: OK, thanks, this makes sense, especially with how I've seen Jackrito play D1s.but I am trying to break him out of his usual "mold", otherwise he will become bit of a challenge to read later in the game. Though his increased activity in this D1 intrigues me a little inside. I would say he gets town rep, because sightless is one of those lynchs where you will not be blamed if he turns bad and it will be more, blamed on Sightless playstyle. People will like the way that he is proactive in scumhunting and had clear ideas even if wrong as well . As scum they are little negatives in lynching Sightless espically if he has a good role. But you don't touch on the point on reasons/conviction for a lynch to go through. SightlessReality is a poor choice when it comes to develop a strong reason/conviction to lynch him. So with this new point, why would it be that he would gain town rep from this? The way these games have been going lately, townies can just mislynch freely and get no blame put on them because we blame people for townshaming more now. I feel scum are starting to realise as long as you put some reasoning down on why this is the best lynch at time. You will not be blamed for it and get townread instead for been proactive. You don't need as strong reasons to be town read as it used to be sadly. I also don't read conviction as a town move this early either since it is impossible to be sure, so as I said imo a sightless lynch is a good way to appear like you are scumhunting and trying to help town and not be blamed when it backfires. It is very low risk and gets a lot of reward from a scum point of view. Not really....You aren't really scum hunting if you tunnel in one player and not pressuring back, that isn't proactively scum hunting. Based on past experienced, you won't get much out of Sightless no matter what you do, so trying to scum hunt him is bit of a joke (but at the same time bit of a risk to keep around since he is so tight lipped to be indicative on his own alignment). It's a foolish move for scum imo. If this gave you a slight scum tell on Soren, why not vote him? Because I need a lot more then a slight scum read on someone to vote them, I don't throw votes around freely if I vote someone past the early game I normally have a decent reason. A slight one but I like to see how a person acts over time and then view it as a whole. Rash actions only lead to mistakes. Where's the pressure in that though? if he's scum, why not add a bit of pressure with just your vote? You know I don't pressure people as hardcore as others do and they are other ways to pressure someone without voting. but you told me in a past game that you don't like to pressure people because of your passive playstyle so you just use your vote. but I don't see you using your vote here yet I also told you I vote with purpose, which i don't have enough of a scum read to do yet. Also the whole not doing more to pressure people. is something I'm trying to change. A passive playstyle is useless I use it well. I fail to see the purpose in your rvs vote though, so why did you vote here? I never said it was a true RVS vote, you know the reason why I did it as well.Even though the effect has been lost a bit by how much I'm getting attention instead . |
Jun 11, 2016 3:14 PM
#200
Jackrito said: A passive playstyle is useless I use it well. What does this mean? |
More topics from this board
» Count To 7777 V3 ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Lambtron - May 15, 2018 |
1162 |
by SoulEaterQUEEN
»»
Sep 14, 5:38 PM |
|
» [GAME] Last Letter Game ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )grave_robber - Sep 9, 2014 |
8752 |
by Aswin_Ash
»»
Jan 23, 11:52 AM |
|
» Chat Thread ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Fo - Jul 10, 2014 |
3741 |
by Jackrito
»»
Jan 11, 3:55 PM |
|
» [GAME] (* ̄・ ̄)ノ Count to 30 Before a Slightly Inebriated Staff Member Posts! v4 ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Togs - Jul 2, 2017 |
2870 |
by Jackrito
»»
Jan 8, 11:22 AM |
|
» [GAME] (* ̄・ ̄)ノ Count to 30 Before a Slightly Inebriated MEMBER Posts! v1 ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )SoulEaterQUEEN - Mar 26, 2016 |
1990 |
by Serafos
»»
Aug 17, 2024 9:42 PM |