Dec 14, 2012 10:37 PM
Is Disability A Criminal offense?
Anime Relations:
Dennou Coil
Is Disability A Criminal offense?
Can Your OB/GYN Be Wanting To Murder Your own Disabled Child?
For what reason the most recent, less invasive exams for detecting the possibility of being pregnant with a disabled child (Down syndrome), being pressed upon us? Essentially generating a feeling that it is asked for by women? So are we to think that women in this country are in a hurry to kill their own babies on the slight indicator of the little one having a disability? Hopefully not.
A local, "nice" OB/GYN whom you put your confidence in may perhaps be hardly anything else, but a profit hungry salesman, pressuring on to highly-priced tests getting him/her a good profit, but causing you to be in anguish all your life. Nobody can live in peace after eradicating her own little one?
Washington Post Necessities Disability Cleansing
Which side is the press like Washington Post on? Not necessarily your side. What makes this question imperative to ask? Purely because their reporting is rather biased and opinionated, manipulative as well as misleading. Washington Post in their brief article mentions these recent tests to spot trisonomy 21, trisonomy 18 and trisomy 13. Their dependability still not certain. Expected to take the place of amniocentesis that incidentally can result in a miscarriage.
These types of procedures have no coverage by insurance in general. The Issue I noticed appalling in the short article from Washington Post, is the representative from Aetna insurance remark: "..it really is a desirable addition, because of the reducing spending... would have been welcomed benefit.”
How often the "healthy" babies had been killed in error to the agony of the parents? How can you have a guarantee that your baby won't be born with some other disability for example autism, brain damage, etc. not detectible by any screening?
My so called "normal" kids create a whole lot more challenges as compared with my daughter with Down syndrome. Washington Post is intending to insinuate, as a number of other media outlets do, that these kids will amount to almost nothing and may require never ending medical care combined with ongoing supervision. Nothing could possibly be more wrong. Most Individuals with Down syndrome or with some other mental disabilities, anytime supplied with a chance, (much like the "average" kids get) an opportunity of education and training, caring household, use of healthcare, etc., will be able to blossom and become outstanding, self reliant grown-ups who definitely have valuable affect on anybody close to them.
Adopt Children With Special Needs
Parents, grand parents, uncles and aunts, other relatives with no children with special needs will be losing out on a exceptional experience abundant with joy. Most people should give thought to adopt children with special needs, they have got so much to offer to us all.
When our daughter Emilia was born with Down syndrome 4 years ago, I was so anxious, so resentful, so confused. At this moment, when I think back, I cannot help thinking, just how ignorant we were.
We cannot picture our lives not having Emilia and I know it may very well be selfish of me to tell you, however, if somebody should offer to "clear" our child from Down syndrome, I would say, No. It might just take away her complete innocence, her being unable to judge an individual dependent upon your look, her inability to be upset at you for more than a minute, etc. As, I am typing this, I can't stop my tears. This little girl, clearly has this sort of amazing capability to make you happy, to provide you purpose in your everyday living, to touch the depths within your heart and soul, to teach you many different things.
I feel sad for everyone, who won't have the opportunity to experience this, if you don't have a somebody with special needs in your life. And that's exactly it, the media reporter from "Washington Post'" doesn't have a disabled child, or else she would not write content in such a cold and detached - matter of fact fashion. And thus, rather than building a unfavorable image of a little one with disability and promoting the powerful insurance companies, why don't you consider - "Washington Post'", to do something exceptional instead and protect the defendless and be the voice for those voiceless.
Can Your OB/GYN Be Wanting To Murder Your own Disabled Child?
For what reason the most recent, less invasive exams for detecting the possibility of being pregnant with a disabled child (Down syndrome), being pressed upon us? Essentially generating a feeling that it is asked for by women? So are we to think that women in this country are in a hurry to kill their own babies on the slight indicator of the little one having a disability? Hopefully not.
A local, "nice" OB/GYN whom you put your confidence in may perhaps be hardly anything else, but a profit hungry salesman, pressuring on to highly-priced tests getting him/her a good profit, but causing you to be in anguish all your life. Nobody can live in peace after eradicating her own little one?
Washington Post Necessities Disability Cleansing
Which side is the press like Washington Post on? Not necessarily your side. What makes this question imperative to ask? Purely because their reporting is rather biased and opinionated, manipulative as well as misleading. Washington Post in their brief article mentions these recent tests to spot trisonomy 21, trisonomy 18 and trisomy 13. Their dependability still not certain. Expected to take the place of amniocentesis that incidentally can result in a miscarriage.
These types of procedures have no coverage by insurance in general. The Issue I noticed appalling in the short article from Washington Post, is the representative from Aetna insurance remark: "..it really is a desirable addition, because of the reducing spending... would have been welcomed benefit.”
How often the "healthy" babies had been killed in error to the agony of the parents? How can you have a guarantee that your baby won't be born with some other disability for example autism, brain damage, etc. not detectible by any screening?
My so called "normal" kids create a whole lot more challenges as compared with my daughter with Down syndrome. Washington Post is intending to insinuate, as a number of other media outlets do, that these kids will amount to almost nothing and may require never ending medical care combined with ongoing supervision. Nothing could possibly be more wrong. Most Individuals with Down syndrome or with some other mental disabilities, anytime supplied with a chance, (much like the "average" kids get) an opportunity of education and training, caring household, use of healthcare, etc., will be able to blossom and become outstanding, self reliant grown-ups who definitely have valuable affect on anybody close to them.
Adopt Children With Special Needs
Parents, grand parents, uncles and aunts, other relatives with no children with special needs will be losing out on a exceptional experience abundant with joy. Most people should give thought to adopt children with special needs, they have got so much to offer to us all.
When our daughter Emilia was born with Down syndrome 4 years ago, I was so anxious, so resentful, so confused. At this moment, when I think back, I cannot help thinking, just how ignorant we were.
We cannot picture our lives not having Emilia and I know it may very well be selfish of me to tell you, however, if somebody should offer to "clear" our child from Down syndrome, I would say, No. It might just take away her complete innocence, her being unable to judge an individual dependent upon your look, her inability to be upset at you for more than a minute, etc. As, I am typing this, I can't stop my tears. This little girl, clearly has this sort of amazing capability to make you happy, to provide you purpose in your everyday living, to touch the depths within your heart and soul, to teach you many different things.
I feel sad for everyone, who won't have the opportunity to experience this, if you don't have a somebody with special needs in your life. And that's exactly it, the media reporter from "Washington Post'" doesn't have a disabled child, or else she would not write content in such a cold and detached - matter of fact fashion. And thus, rather than building a unfavorable image of a little one with disability and promoting the powerful insurance companies, why don't you consider - "Washington Post'", to do something exceptional instead and protect the defendless and be the voice for those voiceless.
Posted by
PeterKaczmarzyk
| Dec 14, 2012 10:37 PM |
Add a comment