>>I'm glad that you thought the death of Sei Kyou was impactful ( character who made a comeback from season 1 only to be killed in like episode 4 ). By the way, it is a spoiler, you should mention it before you type.
<< it is not a review but a comment on your profile
>>did anyone have any doubt if Ei Seiis going to be king, a subject which is the main plot of the season?
<< did anyone had a doubt naruto will be hokage? did anyone have a doubt luffy will be the king of pirates? i think you knew he will be king since season 1 and you just now said it is "predictable"
>> Ei Sei was the main character which made those bad dialogs and the extravagant "ideologies", which is pretty obvious to who ever watches this season what I talk about. "I will conquer all and then there will be no more war" is downright absurd (or extravagant) ideology, and the way they sell it is just like any cheap propaganda (I will be called a tyrant for the benefit of the future).
<< "is" the main character, i still don't get your point here, the dialog between ei sei and Fui was probably the best dialog in the season and both of their perspectives were fairly good described. You have to remember, this is 200+ BCE, not today's world. The conquest for the territory was world wide, this is not cheap propaganda, this was reality. Even the big Roman empire did the same. Elaborate on this a little more to make a point.
>> But you have a lot of growing up to do, in the way and manner you address others who thinks differently than you.
<< maybe i do, but the way you put the season to shame is just baseless and you don't follow with any elaboration on your opinion, it is like :
Hey, this deki (BNHA) is a wimp, i don't like him and his "i want to be a hero and save the world/friends" , this is so predictable, when he becomes one, killing/defeating the bad guys to make the world a better place. Why should i not review it and give it a 3* because of this?
Look, i get it, you obviously don't like the 4th season, but why would you review it then and express nothing with it? Even a bad review should give the reader something to chew on, your review doesn't help anyone whenever to decide to watch it or not.
It seems like you skipped kingdom 2nd season.
Your review on Kingdom 4th season is just utter nonsense and is based purely on your "feelings". If you want to keep doing reviews give it more depth and description not just "how you felt about a character". This season was the best till this point and it seems like you are just a kid who does not understand it at all.
To go through your useless review rated with 3*
>>This is actually my first review in MAL<< ; Dude, no one cares
>> and I felt the need to write a review since I really enjoyed this series up until the 4th season. >> again, no one cares
>>Many people would disagree because this show ,animation wise, improved drastically from season to season, and still has room to improve- What really kept me excited was the plot though and I enjoyed it since the first arc.<< We know the animation from season 1 to season 2 improved... but still, this has nothing to do with season 4
>> Unfortunately I really loath the 4th season arc,<< ok
>> it is filled with poorly made dialogs <<
This is utter nonsense, i did not see any "poorly" made dialogs, they were at the very least "ok" and not "poor", heck most animes have a poor dialog here and there, this opinion is nonsense. provide at least one or two, do not claim something which is not true
>>and extravagant "ideologies" which I can't describe it otherwise than downright cheap propaganda<< what do you even mean here? Do you even know what you are talking about? first of all, i believe you are using big words here of which you know nothing about, extravagant "ideologies"? what do you mean? how the politics and economy work in this anime? it is not real life, it is anime and it is fairly good compared to any other in this genre. This one really makes no sense if you can't elaborate more, just making your review more "i know what i talk about, i'm adult".
>>previous seasons were unpredictable with the death of important and impactful characters. <<
The death of Sei Kyou ( important and impactful character ) was unpredictable. This statement is a total lie.
>>This season is as predictable as it comes.<< if you read the manga, ok, if you did not, what was predictable for you? again, there were many twists, utter nonsense once again
>> I loved the series up until this arc, still love some characters, but Ei Sei became terrible character in my opinion.<< This is just your opinion once again. everyone loves/hates some character in every anime, what does this have to do with a review?
So, all in all after dissecting your review, which you rated with 3 based on one statement with big words and no elaboration, your review is totally useless and gives the reader nothing and all you wanted is some attention and in this, you succeeded, bravo
And before you post another review, read how it should be written
Avoid unnecessary openers: “This is my first review, please forgive any mistakes.”
A review is a critical evaluation of the content, style, and personal enjoyment of the work you have chosen to review.
Readers are not interested in how you came to watch the work or how the anime made you feel.] They are interested in whether they will like the anime and are using your review to decide this. This is where your review fails, it gives the reader no information on this
This means [b]you need to give readers solid information on what was was unique, great, disappointing, etc about this series, andwhy. Support your statements with concise descriptions, examples, and reasoning.
All Comments (2) Comments
<< it is not a review but a comment on your profile
>>did anyone have any doubt if Ei Seiis going to be king, a subject which is the main plot of the season?
<< did anyone had a doubt naruto will be hokage? did anyone have a doubt luffy will be the king of pirates? i think you knew he will be king since season 1 and you just now said it is "predictable"
>> Ei Sei was the main character which made those bad dialogs and the extravagant "ideologies", which is pretty obvious to who ever watches this season what I talk about. "I will conquer all and then there will be no more war" is downright absurd (or extravagant) ideology, and the way they sell it is just like any cheap propaganda (I will be called a tyrant for the benefit of the future).
<< "is" the main character, i still don't get your point here, the dialog between ei sei and Fui was probably the best dialog in the season and both of their perspectives were fairly good described. You have to remember, this is 200+ BCE, not today's world. The conquest for the territory was world wide, this is not cheap propaganda, this was reality. Even the big Roman empire did the same. Elaborate on this a little more to make a point.
>> But you have a lot of growing up to do, in the way and manner you address others who thinks differently than you.
<< maybe i do, but the way you put the season to shame is just baseless and you don't follow with any elaboration on your opinion, it is like :
Hey, this deki (BNHA) is a wimp, i don't like him and his "i want to be a hero and save the world/friends" , this is so predictable, when he becomes one, killing/defeating the bad guys to make the world a better place. Why should i not review it and give it a 3* because of this?
Look, i get it, you obviously don't like the 4th season, but why would you review it then and express nothing with it? Even a bad review should give the reader something to chew on, your review doesn't help anyone whenever to decide to watch it or not.
Your review on Kingdom 4th season is just utter nonsense and is based purely on your "feelings". If you want to keep doing reviews give it more depth and description not just "how you felt about a character". This season was the best till this point and it seems like you are just a kid who does not understand it at all.
To go through your useless review rated with 3*
>>This is actually my first review in MAL<< ; Dude, no one cares
>> and I felt the need to write a review since I really enjoyed this series up until the 4th season. >> again, no one cares
>>Many people would disagree because this show ,animation wise, improved drastically from season to season, and still has room to improve- What really kept me excited was the plot though and I enjoyed it since the first arc.<< We know the animation from season 1 to season 2 improved... but still, this has nothing to do with season 4
>> Unfortunately I really loath the 4th season arc,<< ok
>> it is filled with poorly made dialogs <<
This is utter nonsense, i did not see any "poorly" made dialogs, they were at the very least "ok" and not "poor", heck most animes have a poor dialog here and there, this opinion is nonsense. provide at least one or two, do not claim something which is not true
>>and extravagant "ideologies" which I can't describe it otherwise than downright cheap propaganda<< what do you even mean here? Do you even know what you are talking about? first of all, i believe you are using big words here of which you know nothing about, extravagant "ideologies"? what do you mean? how the politics and economy work in this anime? it is not real life, it is anime and it is fairly good compared to any other in this genre. This one really makes no sense if you can't elaborate more, just making your review more "i know what i talk about, i'm adult".
>>previous seasons were unpredictable with the death of important and impactful characters. <<
The death of Sei Kyou ( important and impactful character ) was unpredictable. This statement is a total lie.
>>This season is as predictable as it comes.<< if you read the manga, ok, if you did not, what was predictable for you? again, there were many twists, utter nonsense once again
>> I loved the series up until this arc, still love some characters, but Ei Sei became terrible character in my opinion.<< This is just your opinion once again. everyone loves/hates some character in every anime, what does this have to do with a review?
So, all in all after dissecting your review, which you rated with 3 based on one statement with big words and no elaboration, your review is totally useless and gives the reader nothing and all you wanted is some attention and in this, you succeeded, bravo
And before you post another review, read how it should be written
Avoid unnecessary openers: “This is my first review, please forgive any mistakes.”
A review is a critical evaluation of the content, style, and personal enjoyment of the work you have chosen to review.
Readers are not interested in how you came to watch the work or how the anime made you feel.] They are interested in whether they will like the anime and are using your review to decide this. This is where your review fails, it gives the reader no information on this
This means [b]you need to give readers solid information on what was was unique, great, disappointing, etc about this series, and why.
Support your statements with concise descriptions, examples, and reasoning.