Seky's Profile

Statistics

Anime Stats
Days: 0.0
Mean Score: 0.00
  • Total Entries0
  • Rewatched0
  • Episodes0
Anime History Last Anime Updates

No updates yet.

Manga Stats
Days: 0.0
Mean Score: 0.00
  • Total Entries0
  • Reread0
  • Chapters0
  • Volumes0
Manga History Last Manga Updates

No updates yet.

Favorites

Anime

No favorite anime yet.

Manga

No favorite manga yet.

Characters

No favorite characters yet.

People

No favorite people yet.

All Comments (66) Comments

Would you like to post a comment? Please login or sign up first!
JKinky88 Jul 20, 2016 2:38 PM
Meh, I love both anyway. It's my opinion you know?
Seky Jun 14, 2016 11:21 AM
You're a liar and a novice. I did gif. I read the manga and not skipped anything important in the first season. And what you tell me note that not read the manga. He's just assuming things because never read a manga or a novel.

-For your information a manga of 15 pages for chapter, several chapters of the manga used to cover a chapter of anime. Novice

- My strange perishing find a manga reader tokyo ghoul say that the first season was maladaptive. Now I understand why. You never read the manga. I read manga Tokyo Ghoul 4 years ago, long before the anime begin. In true that the first season a couple of things jumped, but I re-read the manga several times, I can say with certainty that nothing important not jumped in the first season.

-I read manga and light novels of Yahari, Accel World, Air Gear, Akame ga Kill, Beelzebub, Black Bullet, Boku dake ga Inai Machi, Btooom, Date A Live, Dimension W, Dungeon ni Deai wo Motomeru no wa Machigatteiru Darou ka, Fullmetal Alchemist, Golden Time, Hellsing, Hitsugi no Chaika, Jitsu wa Watashi wa, Kamisama no Inai Nichiyoubi, Kekkai Sensen, Mahouka Koukou no Rettousei, Maken-Ki, No Game No Life, Noragami, Overlord, Ouran Koukou Host Club, Rosario to Vampire, Sora no Otoshimono, Soul Eater, Zetsuen no Tempest.

and I can say with certainty that are maladaptive, and that the first season tokyo ghoul has much better adaptation to those other aforementioned animes, and the first season of Tokyo Ghoul had a good adaptation. Any other person who has read, but really these mangas or novels, you'll say the same as me. Mr. novice.

-With respect to animation, it seems you did not see the anime or downloaded in a poor quality. I say that was good animation, it's because I had, I also did the animation gif on page http://giphy.com/ there can not fix the colors.

-Download the anime here https://rokuhotorrents.wordpress.com/2015/02/13/tokyo-ghoul-season-1-complete-uncensored-bd-1280x720/
And show me a gif done for you where you see bad animation.

-Now when people ask him because I put a note 4 to Tokyo Ghoul, You tell them that you just do not like that anime. Do not say it's a bad adaptation because the first season is a good fit, and the second season was announced as an alternative history http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2014-10-11/tokyo-ghoul-2nd-anime-season-video-teases-new-story-by-creator/.79825 And it shows than ever to read manga tokyo ghoul or other. And you put good notes maladaptive animes.
Seky May 29, 2016 7:11 PM
Tokyo Ghoul were 66 chapters in 12 episodes. Each chapter of the manga only had 15 pages and anime in the first season did not miss anything important, it was a good adaptation. The animation was excellent and is 1.000 times better adaptation that: Yahari, Accel World, Air Gear, Akame ga Kill, Beelzebub, Black Bullet, Boku dake ga Inai Machi, Btooom, Date A Live, Dimension W, Dungeon ni Deai wo Motomeru no wa Machigatteiru Darou ka, Fullmetal Alchemist, Golden Time, Hellsing, Hitsugi no Chaika, Jitsu wa Watashi wa, Kamisama no Inai Nichiyoubi, Kekkai Sensen, Mahouka Koukou no Rettousei, Maken-Ki, No Game No Life, Noragami, Overlord, Ouran Koukou Host Club, Rosario to Vampire, Sora no Otoshimono, Soul Eater, Zetsuen no Tempest.

It is very obvious that you did not read these light novels or those mangas, if I read, and I can say that Tokyo Ghoul's first season has much better adaptation above those animes. An example Yahari 10 novels adapted into 26 episodes of anime. Also check your animelist and not read those mangas and those light novels.






















Nagatopower Apr 30, 2016 9:05 AM
yeah i know it does,it's from the blu-ray version,i've bought it
Teixe Apr 21, 2016 6:17 PM
I read and watched some of them but they dont matter. TG could be good but they chose to butcher it, 70 chapters in 12 episodes really couldnt work. Also the animation was really bad, i make gifs in my spare time so i have a good understanding of good and bad animation and i can say that TG had really poor animation, the studio that made it didnt even try.
Teixe Apr 5, 2016 5:16 AM
Manga is good while the anime adaptation was really poor, low budget, too rushed, things made no sense at all.
Wasshio Apr 4, 2016 1:46 PM
Honestamente aunque eso sea asi una pregunta. Brincaron cosas importantes? Brincaron algo que puede ayudar con el conflicto? el anime puede pararse a si mismo y por lo menos por lo que yo he visto, lo hace bien.
Wasshio Apr 4, 2016 12:23 PM
Yo oi que la novela ligera de ambos fueron adaptados correctamente.

Con Dimension W yo la odio asi que no pienso leer el manga, Erased ya lei el manga.
E-Mand Apr 4, 2016 10:14 AM
-Have i ever said that :re would get an adaptation?
-You're in the industry? Nice. Sounds good Studio Seky
-The 'plot' is still the same, the way that it is portrayed is diffrent
-And the problem with canonficial filler is...?
E-Mand Apr 4, 2016 9:22 AM
Yes, yes i did, and i was a pleasure.... or something on the line of that. And i'm not saying that you're wrong with :re not being able to be adapted after √A, but the fact that you yourself said that Pierrot and Ishida made √A so that they wouldn't have to adap :re is bullshit and has no cover of information, it's either your stupid tumblr. theory or you trying to sound smart about the anime industry.
What i'm saying that isn't right about your comment is you not calling √A and adaptation, since it is. Sure the story is somewhat original compared to it's source material, but does still fall under the category of an adaptation. Since, the characters are still behaving the same as they did in it's source material (though, Kaneki's perspective of the oucurring events are diffrent). The story all in all story-line isn't diffrent, it's as i've said before, another perspective or a 'what if' scenario of what really happend in the manga.
And a fallback on your first comment. Quote "Who wants to see Tokyo Ghoul re adapted when the first 60 chapters of the manga are canonical stuffing? It would be a full season of only fill." Describe to me what you mean by filler, since you don't seem to know what that actually means. The first 20 or so chapters are character introduction and charactor bulding, for the viewer/reader to get comfortable with the charactors. The rest of the chapters are cannon to the story. None of it is filler.
So i'd gladly hear your view of: 'what makes a filler a filler'
E-Mand Apr 1, 2016 9:49 AM
I guess you can't neither understand proper english and take a hint.
The story isn't original in √A, it does however follow the story in another perspectove, therefore making the story somewhat original but still not entirely an original story, since it takes moments from the manga and puts them from as i said earlier, from another perspective. This does not mean that it is a original story nor does it make ait a fram by fram adaptation from its source material. I guess the better way to describe √A is, it being a representation of what the story could have been or as it's been called since teased; a 'what if' take on the manga.
And no where has there been a reasoning for this, so your assumption of Studio Pierrot making this storys form of version so they'd not have to make an adaptation of :re is false and therefore, stupid.
Hysteria103 Apr 1, 2016 3:27 AM
Did I say that somewhere? Thanks for looking through my MAL, if you did.
Teixe Mar 31, 2016 8:06 PM
They were just plain bad
E-Mand Mar 29, 2016 3:24 PM
Guess you're either a really unoriginal/bad internet troll or just stupid in your way.
So i guess the answer would either be; "No comment" or "word."
So i'll just leave it at that before you start with the Damn Daniel or HISSSSSSS
E-Mand Mar 29, 2016 1:22 PM
As long as the product follows its source material or just uses elements from the source material like; characters, story line etc. then the definition used for that is an adaptation.

You've been fucking myspace for centuries or something fam?! How come you not know the the meaning of someone saying k...

but... explanation of the use of k: