[Oshi No Ko]
| Majority of people do not support this ship, the ones that do are a very small portion of the community. |
 "You fought to the end. You survived. That's why you're here now. I think that's something you should be more proud of." - Vladilena Milizé |
| Im fairly new to watching anime and im already used to shit like this lmao |
| Another one of these threads, OnK forums are running wild after chapter 123. Atleast, if you are going to discuss manga do it in the manga forum. |
| Don't bring that age gap bs here if you only complain about Aqua x Ruby. |
| Godless degenerate people. When such specimens see something getting positive attention, they get a thrill out of making it filthy and gross. The same way some enjoy watching violence and gore, others simply get excited when something is morally wrong. |
ktg said: Hell_Bridge said: Why do people simp for Aqua over Ruby? Are they blind? Don't they see that they are biologically siblings? I know there is a reincarnation crap, but still, I mean, even in their previous lives, there was a huge age gap between them. I think most people have lost their minds. I'm not into those shipping things, but what exactly is your point? They are siblings, but this is only a problem when they want to have a child together. And why would the age gap be a problem? I mean even with the age gap, that's still legal. If you are 50, you can have a relationship with a 20 year old. So rationally, there's nothing wrong with ships like this. I bet you love mushoku tensei. |
| Anime Onlys posting in the forums make me chuckle really hard It's like crossing a highway |
| If you want to reply to my posts, come up with valid arguments instead of ad hominem HIGHER LEVEL THINKERS ONLY |
ktg said: IhnalakoKaina said: I bet you love mushoku tensei. No, not really. I mean quality-wise it's good and the fantasy elements or the big mystery are interesting, but I'm not interested in the SoL or romance elements and found that boring. If you wanted to name a show where you can find pedophilia and I liked the show, then you should have said Heion Sedai no Idaten-tachi. But yes, it's pretty pathetic that you can't refute me, so you commit fallacy. Not the pedophilia. The incest, sexual depravity, sex with cousin, sex with niece, AND the pedophilia. And how is it a logical fallacy to sarcastically comment that you probably like a show in which people don't see an issue with sexual relationships between blood related people or people with ages too far apart, just because it's not illegal (it is if one of them is underage), after you just said that you don't see the issue with it? You want a rebuttal? As for pedophilia, I shouldn't have to say it, but children don't have the mental faculties to consent. A 20 year old with a 50 year old? That's not right either, since the age disparity makes it impossible for the union to meet its purpose, to make AND RAISE children together and to be faithful to each other. After the older one dies, the younger will have to keep on living alone. And as long as you don't make children you can have sex with siblings? Ok Oedipus. The pursuit of pleasure is corrupting. Sex for pleasure's sake alone is wrong. You can't have children with family, you shouldn't have sex with them either. I'm sure you'll be the one making red herring arguments such as "so you don't believe widows should remarry, or people who have sex with multiple other people are dirty and evil"... stupid shit like that. No, I just explained what is ideally morally correct, obviously people are fallen creatures that make mistakes, but to not acknowledge what is right and what is wrong, that's what makes you bad. |
Sorry, I couldn't help it, since the show is positively filthy, like the crap blud is saying. |
ktg said: It is fallacy because you based on nothing. I didn't say anything about what I like or disliked about the show and pretty clearly said that I'm not interested in ships. Or would you accept it as an argument if I say that you are hypocritical because you fk'd your 2 year old child yesterday? I used the same logic and knowledge you did, so you must accept it, right? But yes, you talked about me and not about what I said, that's a fallacy. I use points, so it will be easier to follow: 1. This point will be about pedophilia. You can't talk about being a child, because that's, again, a subjective definition. Like I said, 500 years ago a 14 year old was considered as adult. And btw, it's not about having sex, it's about sexual attraction. You can be pedophile without sex, because it just means that you sexually attracted to prepubescent children. That's all. But your argument is wrong on several level. Because you are talking about mental age and that's different than your biological age. Your body can be 30 years old, but your mental state can still be on a 14 year old level. By your definition, we should have had sex at all, because it is possible that you had sex with a mentally child person. 2. This is the age gap paragraph. This is also a fallacy because it is illogical. First, what you mentioned here is just simply stupid, because it's a religious propaganda. Second, having sex and having children are two different things. Like if I continue your logic, then we could see why it is problematic. If you can't have sex with your family, then you shouldn't hug them. If you can't hug them, you shouldn't touch them. If you can't touch them, you shouldn't speak to them. If you can't speak to them, you shouldn't have family at all. See? As logical as your take. You can have sex without getting pregnant and you can get pregnant without having sex. 3. This is the red herring argument, that actually you committed. Because your take about the having pleasure is evil and sex is about making kids are actually the same as the ones you mentioned in the quotes. These are famous religious takes that anyone who has higher IQ than his/her shoe size won't even mention. 4. Last paragraph. No, you didn't explain anything. You mentioned an anime based on nothing. Again, it's a fallacy. Second, moral is subjective like I said like 3 times and you couldn't even refute that. Third, right and wrong are also subjective and defining that alone and calling someone bad because they don't follow your definition is also falls into the red herring argument. "I bet you love mushoku tensei" is a presumption. Not a stated fact. A single sentence meant as a jab, a goof, a joke. Not a rebuttal, or an accusation. A conclusion reached after comparing your standards with those of mushoku tensei. 1. A manchild or womanchild is pretty easy to identify. What makes a person attractive is both physical and psychological. Assuming you are in your right mind, attractive physical attributes are universally: good health (weight, hair, skin and hygiene that are taken good care of), stature, facial features, and so on. Attractive psychological features are just as clear. Self susteinance, temperament, intelligence, wisdom, tolerance, attitude... I could go on. If you fool someone unintelligent, or immature into having sex with you, YOU ARE A PIECE OF SHIT, I think everyone would agree, even if you dont go to jail. In reality, you know this, but chose to ignore it and hypothesize about ridiculous situations like a 30 y/o with a 14 y/o mental age because there's no other way to justify your position. 500 years ago, 14 was an adult? Good for you. 500 years ago they didnt shower for a month. So I take it you don't either... 2. I never mentioned religion. From a purely pragmatic standpoint, the best way to reach happiness is by forming a family. You can try to convince yourself that a life in pursuit of pleasure above all is the most fulfilling, better than anything. But that shit leads to remorse, contempt, envy, addiction, crime, loneliness and pain (as in unhealthyness). And you conflate sexual pleasure with physical affection. Yes, you can have sex without concieving children, but the biological purpose of sex is reproduction, and the pleasure derived is just an incentive. How the fuck does that mean that you can't hug mom and dad? 3. Pleasure is amoral. It is the prioritizing of pleasure that is wrong. You resort to ad hóminem against me for quoting the ideals of arguably the most successful ideology that has brought you and everyone the most advancement anywhere in the world? You know what, cunt? You're an edgy atheist, you can go fornicate yourself with a lime rock in the godless soviet union, or china. Christian religion is the reason we're not all killing each other over land and raping and pillaging to expand the power of a shitty emperor, ungrateful bastard.... Mmmhhh. Sorry I lost my cool for a sec. 4. Morality is not subjective. Clearly you don't believe what is depicted in the bible is real, so I won't even bother with that. But like I said, those moral prescriptions are the single most efficient way to attain happiness and purpose. It is time tested and irrefutable, if you consider the world you live in today better than 500 years ago (maybe you don't). You don't seem to know what a red herring logical fallacy is. It's a rebuttal or counterpoint that mischaracterizes the point it's trying to refute. Saying someone is wrong for pursuing sexual pleasure is not a red herring. It's a moral judgement, moron. But hey. I guess you figured it out, you know the meta of life don't you? So go on and live your miserable, vain life. I just hope that when you're 50 and alone, you don't start having meaningless sex with impressionable 20 year olds, or worse yet, with your cousin. Although, it's hard to think anyone will want to touch you. |
ktg said: Hell_Bridge said: Why do people simp for Aqua over Ruby? Are they blind? Don't they see that they are biologically siblings? I know there is a reincarnation crap, but still, I mean, even in their previous lives, there was a huge age gap between them. I think most people have lost their minds. I'm not into those shipping things, but what exactly is your point? They are siblings, but this is only a problem when they want to have a child together. And why would the age gap be a problem? I mean even with the age gap, that's still legal. If you are 50, you can have a relationship with a 20 year old. So rationally, there's nothing wrong with ships like this. since it hasn't hit you yet, I'll list em out for you 1. Incest (bad and ew) 2. Pedophilia (very very bad and very very ew) |
 |
Hell_Bridge said: Why do people simp for Aqua over Ruby? Are they blind? Don't they see that they are biologically siblings? I know there is a reincarnation crap, but still, I mean, even in their previous lives, there was a huge age gap between them. I think most people have lost their minds. Just saw this today.  |
More topics from this board
Poll: » "Oshi no Ko" Episode 1 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Usopp8000 - Mar 27, 2023 |
2764 |
by subahokke
»»
Nov 11, 8:15 PM |
|
Poll: » "Oshi no Ko" Episode 4 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Ricky16 - May 3, 2023 |
470 |
by Sozer
»»
Oct 29, 1:48 AM |
|
Poll: » "Oshi no Ko" Episode 6 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Ricky16 - May 17, 2023 |
898 |
by Mineismyfavorit
»»
Oct 28, 3:43 PM |
|
Poll: » "Oshi no Ko" Episode 11 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )ChizuruNakamura - Jun 28, 2023 |
720 |
by dan_Szymianko41
»»
Oct 9, 1:20 PM |
|
Poll: » "Oshi no Ko" Episode 2 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Stark700 - Apr 19, 2023 |
872 |
by yyaku
»»
Oct 9, 4:20 AM |