Forum Settings
Forums
New
This topic has been locked and is no longer available for discussion.
Pages (8) « First ... « 2 3 [4] 5 6 » ... Last »
Mar 23, 2018 12:18 PM

Offline
Jun 2011
5537
Halpher said:
Energetic-Nova said:


actually, weird thing is, you are probably the autistic one being attracted to not human things.... and identifying more with the expressions in 2D than 3D....


I heavily disagree. Why is it "autistic" (By the way everyone spams that word now) to be attracted to more imaginative, abstract or simply animated things? There is sometimes emotion and feeling put into art or animation as a whole. There are reasons fiction can make one cry than something in real life. I find your comment really immature and just petty. Either one likes or be attracted to 3D things or you're autistic. My goodness, man.


There are more than average autistic people in the anime fandom than not. Main reason I hear from them is that the facial expressions are easier to read and they find them less stressful than real humans.
The anime community in a nutshell.
Mar 23, 2018 12:33 PM

Offline
Dec 2017
1527
Dr-Octagon said:
Botan-Chan45 said:
Is it you?Because this post is just retarded. #Monkey

There's only one guy defending loli porn here, and that's definitely not me. You could have figured it out yourself.
Almost all of the people here are defending it. Your the few that disagree and for not any reason other than your moral compass.
Yeah right there is no way a doujin about vomit exists.
Good song https://soundcloud.com/yeungkakit33/op4-hekireki-last-alliance
Tsumino account is BigMaraIppo
Another Good Song Listen to テスト by mukami #np on #SoundCloud
https://soundcloud.com/mukami/77a
Ashita no Joe and Megalo box are disappointing anime.
My reviews:https://myanimelist.net/profile/Botan-Chan45/reviews
Best Naruto Op: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByCNZxOBVWM&list=RDByCNZxOBVWM&index=1
discord name: Chitoge Kirisaki#9564
https://discord.gg/nGKu6zx my discord server for plebs
Mar 23, 2018 1:02 PM

Offline
Dec 2017
1527
Energetic-Nova said:
Halpher said:


I heavily disagree. Why is it "autistic" (By the way everyone spams that word now) to be attracted to more imaginative, abstract or simply animated things? There is sometimes emotion and feeling put into art or animation as a whole. There are reasons fiction can make one cry than something in real life. I find your comment really immature and just petty. Either one likes or be attracted to 3D things or you're autistic. My goodness, man.


There are more than average autistic people in the anime fandom than not. Main reason I hear from them is that the facial expressions are easier to read and they find them less stressful than real humans.
There is also autistic people jn gaming and other meduims. To just call people autistic because they are more attracted to 2d is just using the word as an insult. Many people are attracted to a drawing, but aren't autistic.
Yeah right there is no way a doujin about vomit exists.
Good song https://soundcloud.com/yeungkakit33/op4-hekireki-last-alliance
Tsumino account is BigMaraIppo
Another Good Song Listen to テスト by mukami #np on #SoundCloud
https://soundcloud.com/mukami/77a
Ashita no Joe and Megalo box are disappointing anime.
My reviews:https://myanimelist.net/profile/Botan-Chan45/reviews
Best Naruto Op: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByCNZxOBVWM&list=RDByCNZxOBVWM&index=1
discord name: Chitoge Kirisaki#9564
https://discord.gg/nGKu6zx my discord server for plebs
Mar 23, 2018 1:32 PM

Offline
Jun 2014
10654
Aann said:
@Kagami That's awesome if you enjoy it! Really! I on the other hand absolutely despise it and no amount of; "It's not like real child porn." Is gonna change my opinion on that. Sure, it is not like real child porn, but I'll tell you one thing, it's sits half a rung above the 'real' thing.


"Im not a lolicon" flew over your head faster than a speeding bullet. I like some "lolis", but tbh the term loli is so overused nowadays that the Mitsuboshi Colors and Nico Yazawa get put in the same category, even though three are very kid like and one is not.

Though, if theres no debating with you then there isn't a point to continue this.
Mar 23, 2018 1:47 PM

Offline
Jan 2018
12
Botan-Chan45 said:
Dr-Octagon said:

There's only one guy defending loli porn here, and that's definitely not me. You could have figured it out yourself.
Almost all of the people here are defending it. Your the few that disagree and for not any reason other than your moral compass.

Because y'all are a bunch of weirdos defending others weirdos who masturbate to kids. Says a lot about your lifestyles.
Mar 23, 2018 2:14 PM

Offline
Aug 2016
142
Kagami said:
Aann said:
@Kagami That's awesome if you enjoy it! Really! I on the other hand absolutely despise it and no amount of; "It's not like real child porn." Is gonna change my opinion on that. Sure, it is not like real child porn, but I'll tell you one thing, it's sits half a rung above the 'real' thing.


"Im not a lolicon" flew over your head faster than a speeding bullet. I like some "lolis", but tbh the term loli is so overused nowadays that the Mitsuboshi Colors and Nico Yazawa get put in the same category, even though three are very kid like and one is not.

Though, if theres no debating with you then there isn't a point to continue this.


Hey, @Kagami, may you point out where I called you a 'Lolicon' please. My eyes must be getting bad because I can't find it within my paragraph to you. I mean surely I did if I riled you up so much? Because as far as I can tell I didn't, and your getting defensive over, nothing.
Mar 23, 2018 2:23 PM

Offline
Dec 2017
1527
Dr-Octagon said:
Botan-Chan45 said:
Almost all of the people here are defending it. Your the few that disagree and for not any reason other than your moral compass.

Because y'all are a bunch of weirdos defending others weirdos who masturbate to kids. Says a lot about your lifestyles.
or because it's fictional. They're not real. No real kids harmed. Unless you think an unrealistic drawing looks "realistic."
Yeah right there is no way a doujin about vomit exists.
Good song https://soundcloud.com/yeungkakit33/op4-hekireki-last-alliance
Tsumino account is BigMaraIppo
Another Good Song Listen to テスト by mukami #np on #SoundCloud
https://soundcloud.com/mukami/77a
Ashita no Joe and Megalo box are disappointing anime.
My reviews:https://myanimelist.net/profile/Botan-Chan45/reviews
Best Naruto Op: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByCNZxOBVWM&list=RDByCNZxOBVWM&index=1
discord name: Chitoge Kirisaki#9564
https://discord.gg/nGKu6zx my discord server for plebs
Mar 23, 2018 2:45 PM

Offline
Mar 2017
483
Defenders of anime that sexualize children are quick to point out that since lolis are not actual children, no one is harmed by their sexualization. As long as no one is harmed, they argue, people are free to enjoy whatever sexual fantasy they want.

The trouble is that the sexualization of children is not limited to fetish hentai that is only encountered by people who deliberately seek it out. Harem series frequently present underage girls in a sexual fashion, and while I am aware that harem series are hardly known for healthy portrayals of sexuality, that lolicon is so prominent in a genre that is only tangentially related to it is suggests that the sexualization of children has become normalized in anime. It's hardly limited to harem. Sword Art Online, one of the most mainstream anime in existence features a scene where a loli is molested by a tentacle monster.

My issue is not with people deliberately seeking lolicon so much as it is with works that bring lolicon into mainstream media. Like it or not, the messages media presents affects the way people act and think in the real world, just as their values outside of anime affect how they view works.

When an anime villain murders innocent people, you root against them, even though no real people were harmed. Why should anime's portrayals of pedophilia be take as cute and funny when child molestation in the real world is horrible and disgusting?
"Bang." -Spike Spiegal

"Everything... is connected." -Lain Iwakura

"Life is too short to watch bad anime. Long Live the 1st Episode Drop." -InkSpider

"Anime fans make me embarrassed to be an anime fan." -InkSpider
Mar 23, 2018 2:50 PM

Offline
Jan 2018
12
Botan-Chan45 said:
Dr-Octagon said:

Because y'all are a bunch of weirdos defending others weirdos who masturbate to kids. Says a lot about your lifestyles.
or because it's fictional. They're not real. No real kids harmed. Unless you think an unrealistic drawing looks "realistic."

So because it's fictional, that means that sexualising children and jacking off to them is ok ? Nonsense. Even if you don't harm anyone, a normal person would not be attracted to kids, real or fictional. Trying to normalise loli porn is not ok.
Mar 23, 2018 2:52 PM

Offline
Dec 2017
1527
Dr-Octagon said:
Botan-Chan45 said:
or because it's fictional. They're not real. No real kids harmed. Unless you think an unrealistic drawing looks "realistic."

So because it's fictional, that means that sexualising children and jacking off to them is ok ? Nonsense. Even if you don't harm anyone, a normal person would not be attracted to kids, real or fictional. Trying to normalise loli porn is not ok.
But they aren't saying it should be normalized. Plus they are attracted to loli's, not real kids. Real kids are what every human despises to the core if your not the father or mother.
Yeah right there is no way a doujin about vomit exists.
Good song https://soundcloud.com/yeungkakit33/op4-hekireki-last-alliance
Tsumino account is BigMaraIppo
Another Good Song Listen to テスト by mukami #np on #SoundCloud
https://soundcloud.com/mukami/77a
Ashita no Joe and Megalo box are disappointing anime.
My reviews:https://myanimelist.net/profile/Botan-Chan45/reviews
Best Naruto Op: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByCNZxOBVWM&list=RDByCNZxOBVWM&index=1
discord name: Chitoge Kirisaki#9564
https://discord.gg/nGKu6zx my discord server for plebs
Mar 23, 2018 2:54 PM

Offline
Jul 2015
2373
First off, there really is no need for you to let the people you work with know what you are watching. Most people don't care, just do your job, and go home and watch what you want to guilt free.
Mar 23, 2018 2:59 PM

Offline
Oct 2014
2569
@Halpher oh I forgot to ask you what you think of the more Realistic Ones i have shown you.
so what do you think of them?
Mar 23, 2018 3:08 PM

Offline
Jun 2014
10654
Aann said:
Kagami said:


"Im not a lolicon" flew over your head faster than a speeding bullet. I like some "lolis", but tbh the term loli is so overused nowadays that the Mitsuboshi Colors and Nico Yazawa get put in the same category, even though three are very kid like and one is not.

Though, if theres no debating with you then there isn't a point to continue this.




Hey, @Kagami, may you point out where I called you a 'Lolicon' please. My eyes must be getting bad because I can't find it within my paragraph to you. I mean surely I did if I riled you up so much? Because as far as I can tell I didn't, and your getting defensive over, nothing.


Chill man haha. Im not riled up, we are just talking. Though, saying its awesome i enjoy it and doubling down on it with "really" is practically the same thing and its on you to make yourself clearer.
Mar 23, 2018 3:40 PM

Offline
Jan 2018
12
Botan-Chan45 said:
Dr-Octagon said:

So because it's fictional, that means that sexualising children and jacking off to them is ok ? Nonsense. Even if you don't harm anyone, a normal person would not be attracted to kids, real or fictional. Trying to normalise loli porn is not ok.
But they aren't saying it should be normalized. Plus they are attracted to loli's, not real kids. Real kids are what every human despises to the core if your not the father or mother.

> loli porn is acceptable
> nobody is saying that it should be normalized

Come on man, you're trying to normalize it yourself.
Mar 23, 2018 3:52 PM
Offline
Jul 2018
564646
Psyotic said:
@Lord_Sithis Don't worry, I too am creeped out by authors who explicitly state that a loli is a child. How dare they make that comparison.
Oh hi there mate! I hope you remember me too. If I recall correctly, arguing with you is pointless, so I won't do that. Have a nice day!

@jaklefire
2. While lolicon does not turn people into pedophiles, it does pander to them. It should come as no shock that people don't like the idea of someone profiting off such deviancy.
4. Anime characters are still treated as people, just stylized differently. The argument that they are not the same purely because the look different is a poor argument.
Oh my god what am I reading?
Mar 23, 2018 4:08 PM
Offline
Sep 2017
815
Loli porn will always have an issue, cause lets face it. Its always wrong to watch underage porn even if its fiction or not. Thats just life bro. I suggest to prepare ur self to lose in arguments, Cause we are the ones doing the wrong things and they aren't.

Mar 23, 2018 4:15 PM

Offline
Aug 2017
846
PeppermintHearts said:
First off, there really is no need for you to let the people you work with know what you are watching. Most people don't care, just do your job, and go home and watch what you want to guilt free.


Uh, what? No one I work with knows what I watch. If you confuse the person in the story with the person that annoyed me then you misinterpreted things. The person in the story, I haven't talked to that person in like 5 months? Also, if you read again you'll see that I refer to that person as someone I met on the internet. Never actually met the person in real life.
Sincerely, from Scorpio.

Mar 23, 2018 4:15 PM

Offline
Feb 2010
34597
ThreadFazer said:
Loli porn will always have an issue, cause lets face it. Its always wrong to watch underage porn even if its fiction or not. Thats just life bro. I suggest to prepare ur self to lose in arguments, Cause we are the ones doing the wrong things and they aren't.


Not really, most people who rant about it mostly just appeal to emotions/feelings without any actual arguments just like you just did. Can't lose an argument if the other side doesn't provide one, but just expresses how they personally feel about it. 'It's always wrong because I feel that way' is not an argument, it's just a personal statement with little implications in terms of actual argumentative value.
I probably regret this post by now.
Mar 23, 2018 4:19 PM

Offline
Apr 2011
1122
Psyotic said:
@yomachi it has nothing to do with being able to differentiate fiction from reality. Just because something is fictional does not preclude it from having moral statements applied to it.
Could say the same thing for all pornography, aside from all the violence in more mainstream media.
Mar 23, 2018 4:28 PM

Offline
Apr 2011
1122
Psyotic said:
yomachi said:
Could say the same thing for all pornography, aside from all the violence in more mainstream media.
Okay? I never said that people shouldn't make moral judgments about porn.
Just wanted to make sure we don't forget that most of us probably deserve hell even when we don't realize it.
Mar 23, 2018 4:32 PM
Offline
Sep 2017
815
Pullman said:
ThreadFazer said:
Loli porn will always have an issue, cause lets face it. Its always wrong to watch underage porn even if its fiction or not. Thats just life bro. I suggest to prepare ur self to lose in arguments, Cause we are the ones doing the wrong things and they aren't.


Not really, most people who rant about it mostly just appeal to emotions/feelings without any actual arguments just like you just did. Can't lose an argument if the other side doesn't provide one, but just expresses how they personally feel about it. 'It's always wrong because I feel that way' is not an argument, it's just a personal statement with little implications in terms of actual argumentative value.
im just making a "Point" im not arguing with anyone. TBF mostly people argue using there emotion and instinct rather then using real subjects (like u said) but there is still value on those arguments, hense people who argue with there emotions tends to be hurt more then people who uses subjects and facts to there arguements. Its better not to argue if u dont have the basic knowledge. Cause it will hurt more if your only doing it with emotions.

Mar 23, 2018 4:44 PM

Offline
Feb 2010
34597
ThreadFazer said:
Pullman said:


Not really, most people who rant about it mostly just appeal to emotions/feelings without any actual arguments just like you just did. Can't lose an argument if the other side doesn't provide one, but just expresses how they personally feel about it. 'It's always wrong because I feel that way' is not an argument, it's just a personal statement with little implications in terms of actual argumentative value.
im just making a "Point" im not arguing with anyone. TBF mostly people argue using there emotion and instinct rather then using real subjects (like u said) but there is still value on those arguments, hense people who argue with there emotions tends to be hurt more then people who uses subjects and facts to there arguements. Its better not to argue if u dont have the basic knowledge. Cause it will hurt more if your only doing it with emotions.


Well, not being able to convince someone to see a topic rationally and not emotionally is the one thing. That's definitely gonna be the case here a lot of the time since people are stuck with their unreflected, instinctual emotional reactions and not much else. But it's not the same as engaging in an actual argument and losing it, that's all I wanted to point out.

And I doubt all the anti-loli people who argue emotionally are gonna get hurt because they lack basic knowledge. I wish life was that simple and fair, but it really isn't. There isn't a lot of upside to staying rational and not getting emotional when it comes to stigmatized topics like this. Right or wrong, reasonable or unreasonable doesn't matter when you social consequences will only ever target one side regardless of who makes more sense.

That's why people don't have to and don't want to even think about the topic or consider the other side, because they know if they want to be safe from social stigmata they just have to vaguely call everyone who's into it disgusting and high five their fellow anti-loli preachers. Abandoning the willingness to have a rational, unbiased debate about a topic is a small price to pay for that to some people, I guess.
I probably regret this post by now.
Mar 23, 2018 4:49 PM

Offline
Dec 2012
16302
The only issue with loli porn is that loli porn shouldn't exist. Who's gonna read 3 goddamn paragraphs dude. Also your tl;dr needs a tl;dr
Mar 23, 2018 5:02 PM

Offline
Aug 2017
846
Psyotic said:
Oh boy, this is going to be fun fun fun =]

@Halpher, I'll start with you first since you're the OP. Firstly, morality being subjective is a piss poor way of attacking or defending a moral position. It can be dismissed simply by asking "yeah so?" and is really nothing more than a last ditch effort to win an argument about morality. While moral relativism is a good thing from a scientific perspective, it is not a free pass to dismiss moral arguments. As a culture, pedophilia is still really fucking gross and it's only natural for someone to be frustrated when you're rebuttal is "morality is subjective" due to what a cop out reply it is. Pointing this out and holding strong moral convictions does not make one an SJW, which is again, another poor fallacious argument that is really only used as a last resort.
Secondly, you are not entitled to a civil discussion under an context, especially so when it comes to something as controversial as pedophilia and lolicon. Acting like someone is in the wrong for feeling disgusted at the thought of wanting to diddle a kid, drawn or not, and as a result is vitriolic towards anyone who thinks otherwise reflects poorly on your own ability to have this argument. If you're not prepared to be smeared, reviled, and mocked, then this isn't a topic you should debate.
Thirdly, whether or not something is harmless or harmful to others is a poor framework to build a moral system upon. Just because something is harmless doesn't preclude you from making moral judgments on those actions, rather it ought to be used as a means to form a legal system. For example, I don't like people who use drugs. I don't associate with them for a myriad of reasons, however I do believe that most if not all drugs should be legal. So while I do think loli porn should be legal because it is ultimately harmless, that doesn't change the fact that the idea of it disgusts the shit out of me. People should not be accepting of such deviant behaviors, regardless of whether or not they are harmful, as they can create an environment in which harmful behaviors can thrive. For example, while drugs ought to be legal, drug addicts should be seen as deviants who contribute little to society and such behavior ought to be discouraged socially rather than legally. The same applies to lolicon. There's a dangerous slippery slope that comes with being apathetic towards people who get off to drawings of harmful behaviors. Why should people not be apathetic towards such activities with dolls, or robots? It gets to a point where these people are no longer socially marginalized and their behaviors become accepted and assimilated into the culture. Culture is ambivalent towards few things, things either fall into deviancy or acceptability, somewhere on that spectrum, and ambivalence soon becomes acceptance. Rock music is "whatever" becomes rock music is "good". Homosexuality moves from "whatever" to "good". The same applies to lolicon. As such, we should not be apathetic towards lolicon but should see it as a deviant behavior, less it be accepted by the culture at large.


Well, I am back from getting my phone fixed. Defective battery, eh. Seeing your reply made me look away from the screen with extreme confusion. I think you have absolutely missed what my point and the reasons I stated what I stated. Many people here seemed to get the idea and they disagreed respectfully, but you just state that I act like someone is wrong for feeling disgusted and as a result is a poor reflection of my ability to debate. You sir, have no actual comprehension of what my point ever was and your entire post is arguing against something that doesn't actually exist. I didn't defend or attack a moral position by saying morality is subjective. I was just making it clear that not everyone thinks the same and will see things a different way, so acting like it's factually correct is conceited. It had nothing to do with being disgusted or simply not liking Loli Porn, but you simply didn't get that from my OP. His moral argument wasn't dismissed at all and I didn't ever say he was wrong. His attitude and approach towards the topic was counter-productive and you have to be there to really understand where I'm coming from. This is also contradicted by my own behavior in this thread where multiple people have expressed their disgust and I didn't dismiss them at all. However, you state that I'm acting like expressing disgust here is a bad thing when I, myself is weirded out by some sexual loli stuff. You go on and on as if I'm attacking people who dislike and find the content wrong when I'm more expressing that it's simply something some dislike and that doesn't mean that it's essentially this issue that everyone makes it out to be. This includes making Loli-Porn out to be the same as pedophilia and trying to get banned. This is where the SJW point is made because in media we have SJW's trying to get games banned due to them being offended or simply not liking it due to something. Your saying "holding strong moral convictions does not make one an SJW" and say it's a fallacious argument, but the issue with YOUR argument is you're defending someone who you don't know. You don't know how this person presented themselves and how they behaved. Yet, you act like this person was somewhat justified. A smart person would ask questions for clarity to gain more context, but you on the other hand is fully behind this person and act as they're what you're making them out to be. You're making ignorant assumptions and that speaks to your integrity here because if you won't bother to be respectful then how will we actually continue discourse without it becoming a shouting match?

I'm not entitled a civil discussion under a context? What? The point of a civil discussion is for two people to be respectful in order for the discussion to actually progress. Attacking and smearing a person won't actually contribute to a discussion, but make it a hostile environment. I'm not acting as if I'm entitled, but it speaks to your maturity and ability to actually hold discussions if you come here not wanting to be respectful, but righteous and high on your morality.

"Third" You have no idea on how my moral system works anyway, but you assume you do. How about...you ASK ME A QUESTION TO BETTER UNDERSTAND ME!? That's what anyone with an open-mind and intending to understand their opposition's position would do, but you so far have yet to do that. It's as if you came here to "rip me a new one" instead of actually contribute to the discussion. I would never do something just because it's harmless, but hey...you think you know what my argument is better than me...TELL ME WHAT I WOULD DO... You literally made the same position on this as me saying that you believe Loli-Porn should be legal, but it still disgust you when IN THE OP I KINDA SAID THE SAME THING...but did you actually read the OP? Did you actually wanted to discuss about the topic with people? What is your intention? Actually, I don't want to further discuss with you and I would like it if you just leave. You're not actually going to make the thread any better, but create tension.
Sincerely, from Scorpio.

Mar 23, 2018 5:07 PM
Offline
Jul 2018
564646
Halpher said:
Psyotic said:
Oh boy, this is going to be fun fun fun =]

@Halpher, I'll start with you first since you're the OP. Firstly, morality being subjective is a piss poor way of attacking or defending a moral position. It can be dismissed simply by asking "yeah so?" and is really nothing more than a last ditch effort to win an argument about morality. While moral relativism is a good thing from a scientific perspective, it is not a free pass to dismiss moral arguments. As a culture, pedophilia is still really fucking gross and it's only natural for someone to be frustrated when you're rebuttal is "morality is subjective" due to what a cop out reply it is. Pointing this out and holding strong moral convictions does not make one an SJW, which is again, another poor fallacious argument that is really only used as a last resort.
Secondly, you are not entitled to a civil discussion under an context, especially so when it comes to something as controversial as pedophilia and lolicon. Acting like someone is in the wrong for feeling disgusted at the thought of wanting to diddle a kid, drawn or not, and as a result is vitriolic towards anyone who thinks otherwise reflects poorly on your own ability to have this argument. If you're not prepared to be smeared, reviled, and mocked, then this isn't a topic you should debate.
Thirdly, whether or not something is harmless or harmful to others is a poor framework to build a moral system upon. Just because something is harmless doesn't preclude you from making moral judgments on those actions, rather it ought to be used as a means to form a legal system. For example, I don't like people who use drugs. I don't associate with them for a myriad of reasons, however I do believe that most if not all drugs should be legal. So while I do think loli porn should be legal because it is ultimately harmless, that doesn't change the fact that the idea of it disgusts the shit out of me. People should not be accepting of such deviant behaviors, regardless of whether or not they are harmful, as they can create an environment in which harmful behaviors can thrive. For example, while drugs ought to be legal, drug addicts should be seen as deviants who contribute little to society and such behavior ought to be discouraged socially rather than legally. The same applies to lolicon. There's a dangerous slippery slope that comes with being apathetic towards people who get off to drawings of harmful behaviors. Why should people not be apathetic towards such activities with dolls, or robots? It gets to a point where these people are no longer socially marginalized and their behaviors become accepted and assimilated into the culture. Culture is ambivalent towards few things, things either fall into deviancy or acceptability, somewhere on that spectrum, and ambivalence soon becomes acceptance. Rock music is "whatever" becomes rock music is "good". Homosexuality moves from "whatever" to "good". The same applies to lolicon. As such, we should not be apathetic towards lolicon but should see it as a deviant behavior, less it be accepted by the culture at large.


Well, I am back from getting my phone fixed. Defective battery, eh. Seeing your reply made me look away from the screen with extreme confusion. I think you have absolutely missed what my point and the reasons I stated what I stated. Many people here seemed to get the idea and they disagreed respectfully, but you just state that I act like someone is wrong for feeling disgusted and as a result is a poor reflection of my ability to debate. You sir, have no actual comprehension of what my point ever was and your entire post is arguing against something that doesn't actually exist. I didn't defend or attack a moral position by saying morality is subjective. I was just making it clear that not everyone thinks the same and will see things a different way, so acting like it's factually correct is conceited. It had nothing to do with being disgusted or simply not liking Loli Porn, but you simply didn't get that from my OP. His moral argument wasn't dismissed at all and I didn't ever say he was wrong. His attitude and approach towards the topic was counter-productive and you have to be there to really understand where I'm coming from. This is also contradicted by my own behavior in this thread where multiple people have expressed their disgust and I didn't dismiss them at all. However, you state that I'm acting like expressing disgust here is a bad thing when I, myself is weirded out by some sexual loli stuff. You go on and on as if I'm attacking people who dislike and find the content wrong when I'm more expressing that it's simply something some dislike and that doesn't mean that it's essentially this issue that everyone makes it out to be. This includes making Loli-Porn out to be the same as pedophilia and trying to get banned. This is where the SJW point is made because in media we have SJW's trying to get games banned due to them being offended or simply not liking it due to something. Your saying "holding strong moral convictions does not make one an SJW" and say it's a fallacious argument, but the issue with YOUR argument is you're defending someone who you don't know. You don't know how this person presented themselves and how they behaved. Yet, you act like this person was somewhat justified. A smart person would ask questions for clarity to gain more context, but you on the other hand is fully behind this person and act as they're what you're making them out to be. You're making ignorant assumptions and that speaks to your integrity here because if you won't bother to be respectful then how will we actually continue discourse without it becoming a shouting match?

I'm not entitled a civil discussion under a context? What? The point of a civil discussion is for two people to be respectful in order for the discussion to actually progress. Attacking and smearing a person won't actually contribute to a discussion, but make it a hostile environment. I'm not acting as if I'm entitled, but it speaks to your maturity and ability to actually hold discussions if you come here not wanting to be respectful, but righteous and high on your morality.

"Third" You have no idea on how my moral system works anyway, but you assume you do. How about...you ASK ME A QUESTION TO BETTER UNDERSTAND ME!? That's what anyone with an open-mind and intending to understand their opposition's position would do, but you so far have yet to do that. It's as if you came here to "rip me a new one" instead of actually contribute to the discussion. I would never do something just because it's harmless, but hey...you think you know what my argument is better than me...TELL ME WHAT I WOULD DO... You literally made the same position on this as me saying that you believe Loli-Porn should be legal, but it still disgust you when IN THE OP I KINDA SAID THE SAME THING...but did you actually read the OP? Did you actually wanted to discuss about the topic with people? What is your intention? Actually, I don't want to further discuss with you and I would like it if you just leave. You're not actually going to make the thread any better, but create tension.
Don't even bother with this guy. I'm telling you, he went to another loli thread some months ago, posted some truly unintelligible things, and when (a lot) people called him out, he either ignored them, or replied with ad hominems and other kinds of fallacious arguments, until everyone just gave up replying. Not worth the time.
Mar 23, 2018 5:11 PM

Offline
Aug 2017
846
Pullman said:
ThreadFazer said:
Loli porn will always have an issue, cause lets face it. Its always wrong to watch underage porn even if its fiction or not. Thats just life bro. I suggest to prepare ur self to lose in arguments, Cause we are the ones doing the wrong things and they aren't.


Not really, most people who rant about it mostly just appeal to emotions/feelings without any actual arguments just like you just did. Can't lose an argument if the other side doesn't provide one, but just expresses how they personally feel about it. 'It's always wrong because I feel that way' is not an argument, it's just a personal statement with little implications in terms of actual argumentative value.


I'm not telling them that they're wrong for how they personally feel about it. That's what my post ended with stating that people dislike it for the simple reason that they dislike it. That's why the "subjectivity" point came up. It's fine to dislike Loli Porn. I think some aren't getting it. Thats what happens when you're overly righteous.
Sincerely, from Scorpio.

Mar 23, 2018 5:21 PM

Offline
Aug 2017
846
InkSpider said:
Defenders of anime that sexualize children are quick to point out that since lolis are not actual children, no one is harmed by their sexualization. As long as no one is harmed, they argue, people are free to enjoy whatever sexual fantasy they want.

The trouble is that the sexualization of children is not limited to fetish hentai that is only encountered by people who deliberately seek it out. Harem series frequently present underage girls in a sexual fashion, and while I am aware that harem series are hardly known for healthy portrayals of sexuality, that lolicon is so prominent in a genre that is only tangentially related to it is suggests that the sexualization of children has become normalized in anime. It's hardly limited to harem. Sword Art Online, one of the most mainstream anime in existence features a scene where a loli is molested by a tentacle monster.

My issue is not with people deliberately seeking lolicon so much as it is with works that bring lolicon into mainstream media. Like it or not, the messages media presents affects the way people act and think in the real world, just as their values outside of anime affect how they view works.

When an anime villain murders innocent people, you root against them, even though no real people were harmed. Why should anime's portrayals of pedophilia be take as cute and funny when child molestation in the real world is horrible and disgusting?


Well, this is a topic different altogether. The point is that some people should be free to enjoy their fantasy as long no one is harmed. These people chose their lifestyle and have their own preferences. The SAO point is exaggerated. She wasn't raped or anything by the tentacle. I've seen a flash animation on Newgrounds where Starfire got destroyed by tentacles. Compare that to a tentacle holding a girl upside down in a game. Some people wouldn't see how it's "sexualizing her" and despite me knowing the stereotype I didn't think of hentai when that scene happened. People watching SAO aren't thinking of sexualizing little girls and many of them don't even care about that scene or actually reference it. I tell you this because I know so many people who like SAO and watch it...

Now I do agree with your point of how media can affect society and I do understand your concern there. However, I feel it's a slippery slope because it only blames media for some people when maybe it's some other factor. I also watched Death Note and you may root for Light Yagami, but do you ever go out and kill people yourself in the name of justice?
I listened to Ready To Die by Biggie Smalls or Notorious B.I.G do I now want to go out and sell drugs, shoot at cops and rob banks?

It depends on the person. Now I still agree that media can affect society, I think it doesn't necessarily affect "all" of society, but I can see how it can affect values and culture.
Sincerely, from Scorpio.

Mar 23, 2018 5:31 PM

Offline
Feb 2016
9
if you're a lolicon, you're just simply sick :D
Mar 23, 2018 5:32 PM

Offline
Aug 2017
846
Turtles_Hunter said:
I agree on the general idea that liking a specific kind of porn is very different to actually wanting to perform (I have nothing against incest porn, but I still find gross the idea of having sex with someone I'm actually related ). It's more about the idea of breaking the taboo than the actual fact. That's why most kinks don't bother me... as long it's between consenting adults.

That said, with Loli, and kids in general, I still find it wrong. Most may not be the sexual predators some people want them be, but still, as armless as it seems to be taken individually, having people defending it on public places (even virtual ones) is bad, because it's banalising the concept of pedophilia. And that is wrong. You can give all the argument you want (like the fact loli in hentai rarely behave like kids, but miniature versions of adults), and their argument may sometime even make sense, it's still wrong. Very wrong. Because admitting that loli porn is ok as long it doesn't really hurt anyone is just one step away from saying pedophilia is ok on the principle, if it doesn't hurt anyone. And that's a way I really don't want the society to go.

So yeah, as much as I love to call them closet pedophiles, I don't think someone that watch/read loli porn has to be a sexual predator in developpment. But I still think they should take a step back and see how moraly ambiguous and potentially dangerous it is, and just stop trying to defend so openly the idea that loli porn is ok. It is not. And as long as you defend this stance, don't be surprised to be treated like a pedophile. Maybe you, as an individual clearly see the line, but do you think someone that was raised in a society where child pornography is allowed as long as it's a cartoon will see the line as clearly as you are? I don't think so. I don't really have a problem with people that watch that kind of thing as their guilty pleasure, as long as they can draw the line (even if it's weird to me). But when I see someone defending loli porn as some people here, or even how they adamantly defend the sexualisation of little girls in mainstream animes, I'm not sure they can actually draw the line.

[edit]
Also, people should stop with the age of consent thing. Because most of the time they confuse age of consent and sexual majority. Age of consent is the age at which, it the person gave her consent, you will not be prosecuted with rape, but with child abuse. Under that age, even with the consent of the person, it's rape. Sexual majority is the age at which it's legally ok for you to have sex. So the fact that age of consent is 12 in japan doesn't mean it's legal to fuck a 12 y.o. kid, but that you won't be prosecuted for rape, but sexual assault/abuse.


No. People can hate or love Loli Porn as I don't care which. I'm not trying to convince people that Loli Porn is ok. I gave my opinion, but it's not intended to convince anyone that it's ok. I feel what you're saying is hyperbole. Liking Loli Porn and stating it isn't a big deal because it doesn't hurt anyone isn't necessarily one step away from pedophilia. It means that some people don't find it necessary to get upset about a guy or female pleasuring themselves to some fictional character created by some stranger or person who may look underaged. The reason being a pedophile is so disliked is how it's a security risk to kids.
I have a problem being told to get ready to be treated like a Pedophile despite not actually being a pedophile. That's the harmful behavior that needs to stop. Only treat me what I am or you'll only assassinate someone's character over a belief that they hold.
Some people may not be able to make the distinction between fiction and reality and that is a shame, but that doesn't necessarily mean that Loli Porn should be banned or that anyone else who may like it is the same.
Sincerely, from Scorpio.

Mar 23, 2018 5:34 PM

Offline
Aug 2017
846
Lord_Sithis said:

Don't even bother with this guy. I'm telling you, he went to another loli thread some months ago, posted some truly unintelligible things, and when (a lot) people called him out, he either ignored them, or replied with ad hominems and other kinds of fallacious arguments, until everyone just gave up replying. Not worth the time.


Definitely not worth the time. He strawwmanned my entire OP and acted like he "GOT ME" or something. Dude is counterproductive.
Sincerely, from Scorpio.

Mar 23, 2018 5:35 PM

Offline
Aug 2017
846
hawaykun said:
if you're a lolicon, you're just simply sick :D


So...should I get some medicine for some people? Maybe...some.........















Bleach
Sincerely, from Scorpio.

Mar 23, 2018 5:38 PM

Offline
Aug 2017
846
Dr-Octagon said:
Botan-Chan45 said:
Almost all of the people here are defending it. Your the few that disagree and for not any reason other than your moral compass.

Because y'all are a bunch of weirdos defending others weirdos who masturbate to kids. Says a lot about your lifestyles.


Am I weirdo because I defend the right for people to masturbate to fictional characters who may be kids? I mean....I don't give a damn if anyone likes it or not. I don't even watch or view Loli-porn.
Sincerely, from Scorpio.

Mar 23, 2018 6:13 PM
Offline
Jul 2018
564646
Halpher said:
Am I weirdo because I defend the right for people to masturbate to fictional characters who may be kids?

Pretty much, yeah.

Or was that rhetorical?
Mar 23, 2018 7:06 PM
Offline
Feb 2018
63
DoctorWasabi said:
ExactlyStandard said:
If someone watches loli porn they're probably a pedophile. Sorry, but it's the truth.


So when you play a videogame where you kill people, then you're probably a serial killer in real life ?

....Holy shit do you have autism ?


Killing people is something you have to do. It's an action.
Pedophilia is being attracted to children. You don't have to kidnap someone to be attracted to children.
Being attracted to children is disgusting and evil. Stay away from the kids.
Mar 23, 2018 7:20 PM

Offline
Jan 2018
12
Halpher said:
Dr-Octagon said:

Because y'all are a bunch of weirdos defending others weirdos who masturbate to kids. Says a lot about your lifestyles.


Am I weirdo because I defend the right for people to masturbate to fictional characters who may be kids?

Yes, and you should be ashamed of it.
Mar 23, 2018 8:14 PM

Offline
Dec 2017
1527
topazio said:
"I also don't think that everyone who simply may like it is for the sole reason of them being a pedophile, but other possible reasons such as: Aesthetics, Context with the Character, Art-Style, etc."

"Context with the Character"

lol
1000 yr old loli boi. Like Lady Yupiel.
Yeah right there is no way a doujin about vomit exists.
Good song https://soundcloud.com/yeungkakit33/op4-hekireki-last-alliance
Tsumino account is BigMaraIppo
Another Good Song Listen to テスト by mukami #np on #SoundCloud
https://soundcloud.com/mukami/77a
Ashita no Joe and Megalo box are disappointing anime.
My reviews:https://myanimelist.net/profile/Botan-Chan45/reviews
Best Naruto Op: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByCNZxOBVWM&list=RDByCNZxOBVWM&index=1
discord name: Chitoge Kirisaki#9564
https://discord.gg/nGKu6zx my discord server for plebs
Mar 23, 2018 8:16 PM

Offline
Dec 2017
1527
ExactlyStandard said:
DoctorWasabi said:


So when you play a videogame where you kill people, then you're probably a serial killer in real life ?

....Holy shit do you have autism ?


Killing people is something you have to do. It's an action.
Pedophilia is being attracted to children. You don't have to kidnap someone to be attracted to children.
Being attracted to children is disgusting and evil. Stay away from the kids.
Killing people can be avoided. You do know that right? lol Better watch out people, this guy can kill because it's something to do.
Yeah right there is no way a doujin about vomit exists.
Good song https://soundcloud.com/yeungkakit33/op4-hekireki-last-alliance
Tsumino account is BigMaraIppo
Another Good Song Listen to テスト by mukami #np on #SoundCloud
https://soundcloud.com/mukami/77a
Ashita no Joe and Megalo box are disappointing anime.
My reviews:https://myanimelist.net/profile/Botan-Chan45/reviews
Best Naruto Op: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByCNZxOBVWM&list=RDByCNZxOBVWM&index=1
discord name: Chitoge Kirisaki#9564
https://discord.gg/nGKu6zx my discord server for plebs
Mar 23, 2018 8:26 PM

Offline
Feb 2018
38
Loli porn isn't illegal except in some countrys
Mar 23, 2018 8:36 PM

Offline
Feb 2018
38
Psyotic said:
agvsss said:
Loli porn isn't illegal except in some countrys


The issue wasn't about whether or not it's legal. This thread is mostly some dude being pissy about some discussion he had on another website, in which some dude was mean to him because of he views lolicon as disgusting, but ultimately harmless.


Yep but there is no issue with loli porn unless you live in a country where its illegal, btw you're not pedo if you like loli porn (imo).
Mar 23, 2018 8:42 PM

Offline
Feb 2018
38
Psyotic said:
agvsss said:
Yep but there is no issue with loli porn unless you live in a country where its illegal, btw you're not pedo if you like loli porn (imo).

There may be no legal issue, but that doesn't mean someone won't face social repercussions for their taste in erotica. Even in Japan where the industry is large enough to lobby parliament to keep lolicon legal, there is a huge social stigma surrounding it and while it wouldn't be as damaging as having the authorities find CP on your computer, you would still risk losing a significant amount of social capital.


I can agree with that
Thanks for the comments btw
Mar 23, 2018 8:45 PM

Offline
Oct 2012
24
@Psyotic
In defense of point #2 Yes lolicon panders to pedophiles, but this does not make all who enjoy loli porn pedophilic. There is a difference between an animated child and a real child. Even anime girls who are of age often look younger than they are said to be because they have smooth skin, high pitched voices and youthful mannerisms. In hentai the concept of virginity, which is tied to youth is expressly praised and inexperience is seen as a good thing. It is only natural for someone who is interested in hentai to explore the youngest, the purest the most beautiful girls if they so desire. If this disgusts you that is fine but you shouldn't label everyone who watched loli porn a pedophile.
Also for pedophiles (that loli porn panders to) it is a healthy alternative to actual CP.
In defense of point #4
The significance of this is that while they do share features with actual young girls, lolis and young girls are starkly different. It is possible, and common, for someone to be attracted to animated lolis but not real children, precisely because of the features that differ between the two groups.
Mar 23, 2018 8:47 PM
Offline
Jun 2017
666
I'm very impress with you taking your own stance, I'm just a person on the internet, but know that if I were there, i'd stance on your side.
my personal view on loli is that they're just one of the fetish in the millions.

there're 7 billions people on earth, each with difference look, thought process, and obviously, fetish. I'm 100% certain that someone you know will have an fetish involve sumission, bondage, domination, femdom, or just super sexist. Does that mean that they will rape the first person they see, not likely. This basically the violence in game argument, which I hope that we can all agree that violence games(say, mortal combat) are NOT the cause of violence.

Is the reason people like loli porn are because they like children in some weird way? probably. Will that lead them to rape the kids that they saw first thing in the morning? NO.
- notice that if you change "loli porn" to "violence game", it's essentially the same thing

Why do they banned child porn? Because it involve actual children in the making, which is obviously f*ck up. That would be the same as a game that used the death of actual human for the violence scenes.
I don't see anything wrong with Loli porn. It's indeed distasteful, but then again, some people also find 50 Shades of Grey to be distasteful.

that's just my 2 cents on the matter
Mar 23, 2018 9:52 PM

Offline
Aug 2017
846
jaklefire said:
@Psyotic
In defense of point #2 Yes lolicon panders to pedophiles, but this does not make all who enjoy loli porn pedophilic. There is a difference between an animated child and a real child. Even anime girls who are of age often look younger than they are said to be because they have smooth skin, high pitched voices and youthful mannerisms. In hentai the concept of virginity, which is tied to youth is expressly praised and inexperience is seen as a good thing. It is only natural for someone who is interested in hentai to explore the youngest, the purest the most beautiful girls if they so desire. If this disgusts you that is fine but you shouldn't label everyone who watched loli porn a pedophile.
Also for pedophiles (that loli porn panders to) it is a healthy alternative to actual CP.
In defense of point #4
The significance of this is that while they do share features with actual young girls, lolis and young girls are starkly different. It is possible, and common, for someone to be attracted to animated lolis but not real children, precisely because of the features that differ between the two groups.



Don’t actually get involved with him. The conversation won’t go anywhere.
Sincerely, from Scorpio.

Mar 23, 2018 10:12 PM

Offline
Aug 2017
846
Long_Ng said:
I'm very impress with you taking your own stance, I'm just a person on the internet, but know that if I were there, i'd stance on your side.
my personal view on loli is that they're just one of the fetish in the millions.

there're 7 billions people on earth, each with difference look, thought process, and obviously, fetish. I'm 100% certain that someone you know will have an fetish involve sumission, bondage, domination, femdom, or just super sexist. Does that mean that they will rape the first person they see, not likely. This basically the violence in game argument, which I hope that we can all agree that violence games(say, mortal combat) are NOT the cause of violence.

Is the reason people like loli porn are because they like children in some weird way? probably. Will that lead them to rape the kids that they saw first thing in the morning? NO.
- notice that if you change "loli porn" to "violence game", it's essentially the same thing

Why do they banned child porn? Because it involve actual children in the making, which is obviously f*ck up. That would be the same as a game that used the death of actual human for the violence scenes.
I don't see anything wrong with Loli porn. It's indeed distasteful, but then again, some people also find 50 Shades of Grey to be distasteful.

that's just my 2 cents on the matter


Weird how many people here who don’t feel Loli Porn is this huge issue are also people who aren’t necessarily huge fans or they also find it nasty. I think at the end of it some are standing by their own morals and principles. Ironic when you consider the Anti-Loli are doing the same, but in a way that is more shaming and making you feel bad. Well, if someone likes playing a game in which they shoot up a school, I’m going to defend that right. According to some here I should be ashamed if I use their logic.
More or so..I’m defending the right to frankly consume or enjoy media that you wish to view or play. I’m not really the one who wants to look at Lolis. Like I said, not my thing. Someone could masturbate to Makoto getting murdered in School Days. Someone could masturbate when Goku gathers energy for the spirit bomb. Yes, you’ll feel weird and think it’s gross, but it’s not really harming anyone and neither does it have any relevance to you.

I very much agree with what you said about actual child porn. It actually harms people. People may like it, but it harms people and thats the issue for me.
Not once have you nor I have argued the moral standpoint. We aren’t acting as if anyone can’t hold their own moral view here. Yet, people here argue with a moral argument, but do they fail to see how they prove my point if not anything?
It will always go to how they simply don’t like Loli Porn and that is ok.
They have their reasons to why they think it’s wrong and I can see why, but does that mean we should have it banned? It sounds like it more disgusts them than actually have the same amount of detriments as actual child porn.

You know on Instagram I saw a video of a baby getting fingered? I never seen anything child porn-like before that video. I found it to be fucking sick. I could say the same for No Game No Life on how I was uncomfortable with them flashing a 12-Year Old Girl’s panties. It had no context and was just fan-service. I wasn’t interested as it was forced to show me a 12-Year Old’s panties. I found it to be weird and it turned me off.
Will I start a petition to get the anime banned? No..why? Mainly because it’s just an anime and it’s not really hurting anyone. It didn’t appeal or make me comfortable and thats fine.
Sincerely, from Scorpio.

Mar 23, 2018 10:50 PM

Offline
Oct 2012
24
@psyotic
I'm not sure why people are being so defensive about this. Being a lolicon comes with a stigma. For the most part if you are a lolicon you should probably keep that to yourself unless you're around company who is understanding and willing to talk about it.

In general discussing your porn habits is strange, and unlike talking about your sex life really has no business in social situations unless you're telling your girlfriend you need to watch loli porn in order to get your dick up in the bedroom or something, but I'm willing to guess the people who slap their meat to cartoon children probably are single.

The internet makes it so that loli porn is in close enough proximity and you're behind just enough anonymity to discuss it freely without fear of social repercussions, but that does not mean that liking loli porn should be in any way socially acceptable. It should be allowed but it should remain looked down upon or looked away from. To praise lolicon and say that it should be openly discussed would be too close to normalizing pedophilia for comfort.
But then again I don't think porn should really be talked about in general, fetishes are just a more extreme version of that. It's private.
Mar 23, 2018 10:55 PM

Offline
Aug 2016
400
@Psyotic That is a point that is very fair and defendable, and I do disagree, but I have a strict barrier between fiction and real life to the point where I find the concept of waifus/husbandos disgusting. I keep these thoughts towards animation and nothing else.
Mar 23, 2018 11:45 PM
Offline
Jul 2018
564646
the main argument against child porn is the sexualization of children, or rather normalization of children sexuality.
if you think that child porn should stay illegal then loli hentai must be illegal for the same reason too. otherwise you behave illogically.
it doesn't matter if this real or not. a real porn video and a fiction novel convey the same idea. the novel "lolita" have been sparked more pedophiles (and even coined the term "lolicon") than all CP combined.

you need to chose the side once and for all. you can't be against real child porn and enjoy watching loli hentai at the same time.

personally i think that sexualization of children is not bad per se.
people against it because it compromises their parents authority. displaying your sexuality is the basic act of independence. parents are gonna mad.
Mar 23, 2018 11:52 PM

Offline
Apr 2011
1122
jaklefire said:
The internet makes it so that loli porn is in close enough proximity and you're behind just enough anonymity to discuss it freely without fear of social repercussions, but that does not mean that liking loli porn should be in any way socially acceptable. It should be allowed but it should remain looked down upon or looked away from. To praise lolicon and say that it should be openly discussed would be too close to normalizing pedophilia for comfort.
But then again I don't think porn should really be talked about in general, fetishes are just a more extreme version of that. It's private.
Totally agree. Unless we're all gonna have an orgy here we gotta stop talking about porn.
Mar 23, 2018 11:54 PM

Offline
Aug 2017
556
I agree with you of it being not really a big "issue" but surely it should not be normalized as it's purpose is maybe to make it look like children despite lolis not exactly look like children. So denfending it and saying it's not doing any real harm to real life children even if it's true it's in no way should be accepted because it might mean accepting pedophilia much like incest porn or eroguro where they potray some really taboo things which should not be widely accepted of it being close to accepting the real thing but it doesn't mean that it should be totally illegal because at the end of the day it's still something of fiction which just means something that is invented or untrue.
Mar 24, 2018 12:09 AM
Offline
Mar 2018
1
Nice use of 'SJW' and 'Triggered'. I can tell that you're really mature. Simply dismissing loli as 'harmless' is just as childish as equating it to real CP. Of course it's not as bad as something that actually exploits children, but that doesn't make it harmless.

You think that a guy getting off to pictures of a childish looking character dressed in frilly clothes and acting innocent isn't getting off specifically because the character is a kid? There's a nuanced debated to be had here, but you're not presenting any real arguments.

Of course some people are merely attracted to flat chested characters. Anime artwork is so far removed from reality that some people (myself included) can be attracted to a petite character that are portrayed as underage by the show they are in (Taiga Aisaka and Nia Teppelin for example) while having no interest in real children. I am primarily attracted to incredibly petite women IRL, but they are still WOMEN.

If a guy is getting off specifically because a character acts and looks childish, there is a serious problem. There's a different between porn of a character that happens to be flat chested and porn of a character that portrays them in a situation that is intended to portray real sexual abuse.

I wish we lived in a world where the law could differentiate between these nuances, but unfortunately everything is pretty black and white. While porn of petite characters should not be banned under any circumstances, there has to be a line we draw. I wish we could discuss this like mature adults, but this is a forum on an anime website. The only place less dignified would be a gaming message board.
This topic has been locked and is no longer available for discussion.
Pages (8) « First ... « 2 3 [4] 5 6 » ... Last »

More topics from this board

Poll: » Re Zero s3 censorship confirmed on 2 characters ( 1 2 3 )

rohan121 - Mar 26

145 by RobertBobert »»
1 minute ago

» Heyya~ How did you find your favorite anime?

Rinrinka - 3 hours ago

16 by KATANAO »»
9 minutes ago

» How often you feel like watching anime?

Cammell - 9 hours ago

22 by Zimmu »»
11 minutes ago

» Have you ever given a anime that you dropped a high score?

Spunkert - Yesterday

19 by mostholy2 »»
15 minutes ago

» I finished season 1 of sailor moon.

luigirovatti - 5 hours ago

1 by Lucifrost »»
27 minutes ago
It’s time to ditch the text file.
Keep track of your anime easily by creating your own list.
Sign Up Login