New
Sep 26, 2022 11:22 PM
#1
Kinda bored so here's something to lose some brain cells. Quite a long time ago, I had a very civil discussion with a huge Madoka fan and at one point, this happened; Me:- "Madoka is certainly a dark show and is might also be a good subversion on general magical girl tropes (I haven't watched any magical girl Anime btw, just talking about how genre is generally viewed). But the ending kinda felt like an asspull. Her wish of becoming a God came out of nowhere and while it was given enough logical reasoning, I wasn't satisfied with the sudden turn of events, and it just felt like they pushed for a happy ending. Madoka fan:- "I understand where you are coming from but there's actually a Buddhist philosophy incorporated in the ending... (Proceeds to back up their point talking about symbolism and how it retells a certain Buddhist story of Nirvana). Me, after reading all that:- "Woah! That's pretty cool. But I'm still not very convinced or, should I say it still looks like an asspull". Now thinking back, I'm kinda wondering how this similar points are also made in discussions about other acclaimed titles like "NGE & Death Note having heavy Christian symbolism" and few others times where people back up a show's writing quality with the amount of religious references/symbolisms it uses and I always think; does it really matter? Or is it not possible to grasp the underlying theme without any of that knowledge? My question is simple; Does an Anime/Manga that retells or uses a certain religious/spiritual story makes it a well written? |
R_2_RSep 26, 2022 11:28 PM
Sep 27, 2022 2:18 AM
#2
simply having those elements doesn't mean that the story is well written, that has to come from the skill of the creator in expressing those ideas in regards to your madoka talk, the fan simply didn't know how to explain and chose to regurgitate something that didn't even matter in that specific talk. If I had to respond to your question I think that it's true that her wish came outta nowhere but what could have been done to fix the problems? we have some forshadowing seeing how madoka is a girl willing to sacrifice herself for the greater good and that wish was good enough, keep in mind that it didn't fix the universe dying, in the end there are wraiths and the magical girls still have to hunt them but at least they don't transform into witches. It can't be an asspull because the story was about magical girls and magic is almost infinite, a wish like that was good writing imo, like I said, the story has the MAGIC element so of course it'll look that big of an even, it's not like it was a realistic anime and some dude jumps 10 meters when in-universe he couldn't do it, just an example. I won't bother to talk about eva, it's probably the same thing, you just encountered some fans that are very simple minded |
CatalanoSep 27, 2022 2:27 AM
Sep 27, 2022 3:19 AM
#3
If it's interwoven, it can enhance a story, but if it's in knots, and bunches, it can be glaring. No story is well-written from symbolism. I agree with you on the Madoka ending, because it didn't foreshadow the right things. 'She's powerful, wow, she has lots of qi, or whatever, she's got some wacky powers' doesn't come close to 'she will literally become a god.' Would've been better (in my overwhelmingly, massively, greatly humble opinion) if a magical girl wished to end world hunger, or stop wars, or something in the same ball-park, and it failed. Kyubert may've mentioned it's not possible for something that world-changing, I haven't watched the show in 4 years, but it failing seems like more solid foreshadowing, if that was the case. Idk, maybe I was low IQ, high EQ, low T, high E, and failed to miss some obvious 'she will become a god' foreshadowing at 12:53 in episode 7. Obviously, religious symbolism can add a touch of grandness to a story, but if it's out of nowhere (like Madoka), or idrk (like Evangan), then it doesn't enhance anything. If Lillith was called 'Massive Woman With Vagina Forehead Eye' in Spanish, and the Third Impact was called the Third 'People Will Die' Event in Afrikaans, I wouldn't really care. |
Sep 27, 2022 3:51 AM
#4
It won't grant a well-written story though. Just because "that" anime uses weird foreign word like from ancient roman or something, it doesn't guarantee a well-written story. |
This's my profile This's my anime list This's my reviews 🌸Would you be my friend?. I'd love to have an online friend.🌸 |
Sep 27, 2022 4:29 AM
#5
Not really. It's easy to use symbolism or make random references, to problem is fitting them naturally into a story. Another point is that the author may not even be aware of the deep meaning of the symbols they're using. I mean, it's possible to have a much deeper reading of a text than the author intended. Do we really know that the Madoka's creator was inspired by that particular point of Buddhism? Maybe the aesthetic was cool and the viewer is projecting stuff (like the crosses in Eva that mean nothing but fans over analyzed). Or maybe he was so involved with that religion, or it's just too common knowledge that it came out naturally without much thought - ideology - (similar to how we see characters coming back from apparent dead as an awesome power move, not considering any resemblance to Jesus or without having a Christian subtext). About Madoka's ending. I don't know about that Buddhism thing that fan told you. It's a interesting take, but IMO it seems pretty reasonable to become a God when you ask someone with endless power to have you defeat every enemy of the world in the past, present and future, no matter how strong they were/are/will be. Plus the magical context of their powers. And given all that Madoka went through with her friends and her selfless personality, her asking for something so wacky as this without thinking about the implications also seems in character. |
Sep 28, 2022 6:46 AM
#6
Not really. It's all about the execution of those elements and how their presence alongside other ones manage to result in an engaging and interesting experience throughout. Just having the ingredients for something that could be really interesting and good, doesn't mean that the final product turns out that way when put together. |
Sep 28, 2022 6:52 AM
#7
Sep 28, 2022 7:01 AM
#8
The only thing that can grant make a show well written is if it has good writing. No more no less. Symbolism is only good as long as the way it is used is good. Madoka's ending being based on buddhism or whatever doesn't change the fact that eternal return is among the laziest endings possible for a story. |
Sep 28, 2022 7:48 AM
#9
nope not necessarily so the way its performed could either enhance or ruin a story best series that handles it is smt imo. |
Sep 28, 2022 8:04 AM
#10
It does not, the foundation of the story is the best part. |
Sep 28, 2022 8:10 AM
#11
Does [X] automatically grants a story or title as well-written? No. |
Sep 28, 2022 9:06 AM
#12
Symbolism and references are meant to be supplementary to a narrative that's already fundamentally sound and well-written by itself, regardless of how simple or complex it is at the core. They're NOT meant to be something that is the main or sole dictation of a series being good or not. Unfortunately, a good number of shows, anime and non-anime, tend to fall victim to that. Symbolism, references, and deep idealism/philosophy will mean nothing, at least in my eyes, if the story fails fundamentally. |
Sep 28, 2022 9:16 AM
#13
No, symbolism is just an add-on to the already existing story. |
Who are you and why do you show your hostility towards a complete stranger whom you've not once spoken with before. Are you seriously asking to get blocked? Well, if that's what your intent is; to tempt me into throwing hands with someone as lowly and insignificant as you, then i may grant your wish provided you articulate yourself a bit better when trying to spite a person of my wavelength. |
Sep 28, 2022 10:04 AM
#14
The depth of a story is in its ability to SHOW its ideas through what happens in the story and the character psychology. Obviously, then, if you simply make a reference to something, the most that thing can do is serve as a filter to analyze what happens in the story itself, but if nothing much is happening then there's nothing to analyze. Less obviously, even if you go a bit further and say that the events of the story are paralleling some idea, like Nirvana or hermetic gnosticism, all you have is still the bare backbone of the idea that you referenced, whereas the idea itself might take a whole nonfiction book to flesh out. If the story wants to have claim to all the depth of the idea, then most of the nuance and detailing of the reference has to be in the story itself. On a related note, I once saw a post that excused Sayaka's poorly written character by saying that her disproportionate reaction to her status can be excused by the fact that she embodies the idea of a knight templar. And knight templars are dogmatic in their ideals. Check this out: https://thepageofhopes.tumblr.com/post/39628854610/let-me-tell-you-about-sayaka-miki So OK, you're basically ADMITTING this character is nothing more than an archetype and not written as an actual person, and then you're using the fact that she's an archetype to excuse poor character writing? What backwards logic. If the character isn't an actual character, and doesn't behave in a human way, then the story loses its credibility and integrity and loses all claim to thematic significance. Then it's just an elaborate thought exercise rather than something that I can buy into. In-story, it makes no sense that a teenage girl in modern times would adopt an unreasonable mindset based on a stereotype from medieval times for no explained reason. It's just another example of Urobuchi positing some idea, and the character arbitrarily follows that idea, and then fans explain undercooked character writing by saying that it makes sense because the character follows that idea. This relates back to the OP's question, because it goes to show how you can't just insert external ideas that have already been developed and discussed into your story and use it as a writing shortcut to prop up the rest of your story. Something doesn't make sense? Refer to the outside text. You want to claim this story is deep? Refer to the other numerous books written about the topic. Since the topic is deep, then this story must be deep as well. And lastly, yes, the ending of Madoka Magica WAS an asspull, just like every other major event in the show. It's the equivalent of the genie giving your three wishes, and then you wish for more wishes. "Here's the power to do anything, as long as it's not against these set of arbitrary rules." "OK, I'll simply use this power to do anything to negate those set of rules." Ok, then, what was the point of the entire series? |
Sep 28, 2022 10:27 AM
#15
R_2_R said: I say yes (in most cases), but only because a story ambitious enough to include these references in an actually noticeable and recognizable way are typically rigorous and actually goo in other ways. So maybe not directly, but there's definitely a confounded facto that makes this often the case.Kinda bored so here's something to lose some brain cells. Quite a long time ago, I had a very civil discussion with a huge Madoka fan and at one point, this happened; Me:- "Madoka is certainly a dark show and is might also be a good subversion on general magical girl tropes (I haven't watched any magical girl Anime btw, just talking about how genre is generally viewed). But the ending kinda felt like an asspull. Her wish of becoming a God came out of nowhere and while it was given enough logical reasoning, I wasn't satisfied with the sudden turn of events, and it just felt like they pushed for a happy ending. Madoka fan:- "I understand where you are coming from but there's actually a Buddhist philosophy incorporated in the ending... (Proceeds to back up their point talking about symbolism and how it retells a certain Buddhist story of Nirvana). Me, after reading all that:- "Woah! That's pretty cool. But I'm still not very convinced or, should I say it still looks like an asspull". Now thinking back, I'm kinda wondering how this similar points are also made in discussions about other acclaimed titles like "NGE & Death Note having heavy Christian symbolism" and few others times where people back up a show's writing quality with the amount of religious references/symbolisms it uses and I always think; does it really matter? Or is it not possible to grasp the underlying theme without any of that knowledge? My question is simple; Does an Anime/Manga that retells or uses a certain religious/spiritual story makes it a well written? |
Please sign up for MangAlert! It's a little project I made that I'd really like to see the light of day and some users. MangAlert! (please sign up!) GitHub Repo (please star!) |
Sep 29, 2022 12:33 AM
#16
It's kind of funny reading your original post being about Madoka Magica's religious symbolism and then saying that Christian symbolism applies to specifically other anime. Madoka Magica is deeply immersed in Christian symbology and themes, and it significantly informs the plot. Literally the first shot after Madoka wakes up: Garden of Eden The forbidden fruit. Sayaka is offered the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil. Sayaka refuses to eat the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil. There's a large amount of symbolic significance to Sayaka rejecting the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil. I fully intend to write a blog post about this at some point. I would have to watch Madoka Magica again to do that, to make sure I don't miss anything. And I don't really feel like watching Madoka Magica anytime soon. So it's a long-term future project. This is a very familiar pose for people who are Christian. Homura frequently appears with water all around her, and water is used to show her 'ability.' Why is this? Because Homura represents John the Baptist. The person who heralds the coming of Christ (Homura does this by protecting Madoka from an unwise wish). Just like John the Baptist, barely anybody ever believes Homura (John the Baptist lived out in the wilderness as an outcast). Madoka Magica generally is filled with water imagery all over the place, because Madoka as an allegory for Christ represents a salvation narrative. And baptism as a purification process makes it clear that for Christians water allegorizes deeper forms of purification, such as absolution of sin. This all relates to Soul Gems and Madoka absorbing those sins into her Soul Gem, Christ is literally called "he who takes away the sins of the world" by Christianity. It's clearly not a coincidence that Episode 12 aired on Good Friday. To your specific question. No, not really. Such symbolism has no real value in and of itself, but only insofar as it bolsters and helps elucidate the themes of the work to those who recognize the symbols. It's also important that the story be accessible to everybody, regardless of that symbolic content. So, the story shouldn't get 'much worse' for people who don't 'get' the references. I will say that as a Christian, there was no confusion whatsoever about Madoka becoming Madokami, because the buildup and symbolism made it all make perfect sense to me if I simply understood Madoka as an allegory for a Christ-figure. There's no friction in my mental models for that whatsoever, it all fits perfectly. So perhaps Madoka Magica was too uniquely suited to Christians and that means it's actually not accessible to everybody. Edited to put all the images in a spoiler tag. |
ScionOfCyanSep 29, 2022 12:56 AM
Sep 29, 2022 12:42 AM
#17
In fact, given what I have heard about the "Christian symbolism" in NGE (which I have not watched), it's all kind of just thrown in there at random, and doesn't inform the work at large. Which would mean that Madoka Magica is miles more 'Christian' than NGE is or ever will be. But I might be wrong about NGE, I haven't watched it after all. After I watch it I might have a different opinion. |
Sep 29, 2022 12:50 AM
#18
>Does spiritual symbolism and/or references automatically grants a story or title as well-written? No, if it's meaningless or solely for the purpose of aesthetic looking then it doesn't grant one to be well-written. |
Sep 29, 2022 1:06 AM
#19
Just because one piece have nika from greek mythology doesn't mean it's good, simple as that. |
. |
Sep 29, 2022 1:11 PM
#20
JustOscar said: Interesting. I had never thought about the apple being a reference to the forbidden fruit. But I don’t understand why would Kyoko give Sayaka the fruit of knowledge of good and evil. It seems to me that she already knows the difference between good and evil. In fact, she knows it too well. I would rather say that Kyoko is offering her the fruit of forgetfulness of good and evil. She is offering her a step backwards, because she has lost faith and thinks that ahead there is nothing but an abyss. My take on this aspect of Sayaka is a little odd and very involved so it will definitely take a full essay to build up the structure that underpins all my thoughts. ScionOfCyan said: JustOscar said: I will say that as a Christian, there was no confusion whatsoever about Madoka becoming Madokami, because the buildup and symbolism made it all make perfect sense to me if I simply understood Madoka as an allegory for a Christ-figure. There's no friction in my mental models for that whatsoever, it all fits perfectly. So perhaps Madoka Magica was too uniquely suited to Christians and that means it's actually not accessible to everybody. Edited to put all the images in a spoiler tag. I think someone who believes in the possibility of a miracle is more open to accept a deus ex machina. In fact, even though there are people who think that a deus ex machina is always a bad element in a story, there are others who actually prefer it. It mostly matters most whether it fits thematically or in the message. Contra what person said upthread Madoka Magica foreshadows what is going on with Madoka and her wish pretty copiously in episodes 1-8. Idk, maybe I was low IQ, high EQ, low T, high E, and failed to miss some obvious 'she will become a god' foreshadowing at 12:53 in episode 7. But as I said, much of that symbolism was recognizable to me in the context of a Christian cultural background, perhaps that person does not have that knowledge. For me, it largely couldn't ever "come out of the blue," which is why the phrase 'deus ex machina' doesn't apply too well to how I personally experienced the story.Obviously, religious symbolism can add a touch of grandness to a story, but if it's out of nowhere (like Madoka) However, episodes 9-11 had a lot of dubious content that mixed up and jumbled up that thematic content. I think a lot of the stuff about entropy and Homura's parallel timelines and 'karmic weight' is seriously detrimental to the story precisely because it clashes symbolically with this previously established foundation and when they jump from scientism eschatology back to Christian eschatology all of a sudden it's very jarring. Madoka Magica is a lot better if they cut out all the sci fi and replace it with more material that's character focused, for example, more scenes showing us the mind of Homura, since she's a wonderful character and Urobuchi/Shinbo kind of hide her true thoughts from all of us for some reason. They run into a big mistake of deciding to explain the 'why' behind a large number of magical elements. The 'why' of magic in your story is totally irrelevant, it adds nothing. Tolkien doesn't explain the scientific 'why' behind Gandalf's magic, Monogatari doesn't explain the 'why' behind its supernatural elements using a scientific epistemology (at least not in the two seasons I watched) etc etc. Good shows about magic don't need to do this. What matters is whatever that magic allegorizes. It really doesn't matter 'why' Madoka is capable of making a cosmic altering wish, it's magic. What matters is the meaning behind the wish or the meaning that conveyed by the consequences of the wish. In terms of meaning it all makes sense. But when you spend 3 episodes talking about entropy and parallel timelines, you put the entire audience into rational-logico mental modes of thought. And then they all get blindsided. It's rather a bad mistake, honestly. Eps 9-12 are significantly worse than Eps 1-8. It's kind of disappointing because eps 1-8 are totally, nonsensically good. Like, there's a good chance I never see another anime that surpasses the heights of Eps. 1-8 for the rest of my life. But I guess it makes sense that continuing to clear such a high bar is really hard. |
ScionOfCyanSep 29, 2022 1:28 PM
Sep 29, 2022 1:22 PM
#21
depends on how literate the viewer is. the average viewer now just don't know how to read book and interpret details. this comes from both sides, the author and the audience. so no, symbolism and references are good if they are used in such a way to propel the story, not the try to add meat to a plot. on the other hand, don't expect the average person to appreciate a museum. art can be misunderstood. |
Maybe watching, maybe reading, probably living |
Sep 29, 2022 2:06 PM
#22
Sep 29, 2022 2:21 PM
#23
Ah yes, the defense of the average Evat**d. Or Megucakek. No, visual elements mean absolutely nothing when they send no message to the viewer. And that's the case for both Evangelion and Madoka - neither work has proper symbols, just background elements that merely appear to be symbols at first surface glance. IMO it's the indication that somebody either speedwatched or didn't follow the plot very well - because both works have messages stemming from plots. |
Hot Blood saves lives. |
Sep 30, 2022 8:51 AM
#24
JustOscar said: ScionOfCyan said: It mostly matters most whether it fits thematically or in the message. Contra what person said upthread Madoka Magica foreshadows what is going on with Madoka and her wish pretty copiously in episodes 1-8. Idk, maybe I was low IQ, high EQ, low T, high E, and failed to miss some obvious 'she will become a god' foreshadowing at 12:53 in episode 7. Obviously, religious symbolism can add a touch of grandness to a story, but if it's out of nowhere (like Madoka) However, episodes 9-11 had a lot of dubious content that mixed up and jumbled up that thematic content. I think a lot of the stuff about entropy and Homura's parallel timelines and 'karmic weight' is seriously detrimental to the story precisely because it clashes symbolically with this previously established foundation and when they jump from scientism eschatology back to Christian eschatology all of a sudden it's very jarring. Madoka Magica is a lot better if they cut out all the sci fi and replace it with more material that's character focused, for example, more scenes showing us the mind of Homura, since she's a wonderful character and Urobuchi/Shinbo kind of hide her true thoughts from all of us for some reason. They run into a big mistake of deciding to explain the 'why' behind a large number of magical elements. The 'why' of magic in your story is totally irrelevant, it adds nothing. Tolkien doesn't explain the scientific 'why' behind Gandalf's magic, Monogatari doesn't explain the 'why' behind its supernatural elements using a scientific epistemology (at least not in the two seasons I watched) etc etc. Good shows about magic don't need to do this. What matters is whatever that magic allegorizes. It really doesn't matter 'why' Madoka is capable of making a cosmic altering wish, it's magic. What matters is the meaning behind the wish or the meaning that conveyed by the consequences of the wish. In terms of meaning it all makes sense. But when you spend 3 episodes talking about entropy and parallel timelines, you put the entire audience into rational-logico mental modes of thought. And then they all get blindsided. It's rather a bad mistake, honestly. Eps 9-12 are significantly worse than Eps 1-8. It's kind of disappointing because eps 1-8 are totally, nonsensically good. Like, there's a good chance I never see another anime that surpasses the heights of Eps. 1-8 for the rest of my life. But I guess it makes sense that continuing to clear such a high bar is really hard. Maybe deus ex machina is not the right term. What I meant is that it is a “too good to be true” scenario. Granted, Sayaka is dead and Madoka has sacrificed her human existence, but she was able to rewrite the whole universe and save countless girls from becoming witches. And I was just wondering whether people with more faith in real life are more open to accept a “too good to be true” scenario like this in fiction. I would like to write more concerning your reply, but my thoughts are too disorganized to put them into words. That’s probably true honestly.. |
Sep 30, 2022 9:03 AM
#25
@JustOscar the key word in the context of Madoka Magica and too good to be true is ‘redemption’ Stories are representational and what Madoka Magica’s ending primarily represents is the religious person’s optimism in the possibility of and successful mechanisms for redemption. That’s why the oboe solo is played 2 times. Once at the end, and once in foreshadowing when Madoka tells mom she knows Sayaka is doing the wrong thing but wants to find out how to save her anyhow. The most prominent ‘anti-Christian pseudo-religions’ nowadays have no such mechanism: violate the creed, and that’s it, you’re done, no forgiveness will be granted to you for the rest of your life (consider being ‘cancelled’). |
ScionOfCyanSep 30, 2022 9:07 AM
Sep 30, 2022 8:34 PM
#26
JustOscar said: Maybe deus ex machina is not the right term. What I meant is that it is a “too good to be true” scenario. Granted, Sayaka is dead and Madoka has sacrificed her human existence, but she was able to rewrite the whole universe and save countless girls from becoming witches. And I was just wondering whether people with more faith in real life are more open to accept a “too good to be true” scenario like this in fiction. Well let me put it this way: maybe the people supposedly without faith would never believe in the "too bad to be true" scenario that Madoka Magica sets up in the first place. You can say that the entire premise is kind of like a reverse miracle, or a negative miracle to begin with. So negating that setup with another all-encompassing, abrupt solution just doesn't do it for me. At the risk of starting a religious debate... it's kind of like how you'd first have to buy in that God condemns everyone to death (at best, or Hell depending on your denomination) as a default state. |
Sep 30, 2022 8:48 PM
#27
I'm already here. There are no more brain cells to lose. |
I may make you feel but I can't make you think. |
Sep 30, 2022 9:09 PM
#28
R_2_R said: My question is simple; Does an Anime/Manga that retells or uses a certain religious/spiritual story makes it a well written? Not always, and I dare to say: in most of cases it doesn't make it either well written or deeper than usual anime story. In many cases it's used as a convenient device to give simple and naive story sort of "elitistic element", so something that pseudointellectual anime fans might use to show how "superior" they are towards "common anime watchers". Same goes with few other themes, like military theme in example. Don't get me wrong: well written religious, spiritual, militaristic, philosophical etc. etc. story might be great and visibly better than regular anime or manga. However it doesn't mean that such well written stories dominate in the world of anime and manga. |
Sep 30, 2022 9:59 PM
#29
No why would it. Imagery, references and symbolism are devoid of meaning unless they are given that within context. Also wouldn't really call Madoka being effectively left into a position of seemingly endless suffering, a "happy ending". Even if this is a consequence of her own volition |
KumiveneellaSep 30, 2022 10:10 PM
Oct 1, 2022 12:16 AM
#30
Recynon said: This is an interesting way of putting it and I think potentially has a lot of truth to it.JustOscar said: Maybe deus ex machina is not the right term. What I meant is that it is a “too good to be true” scenario. Granted, Sayaka is dead and Madoka has sacrificed her human existence, but she was able to rewrite the whole universe and save countless girls from becoming witches. And I was just wondering whether people with more faith in real life are more open to accept a “too good to be true” scenario like this in fiction. Well let me put it this way: maybe the people supposedly without faith would never believe in the "too bad to be true" scenario that Madoka Magica sets up in the first place. You can say that the entire premise is kind of like a reverse miracle, or a negative miracle to begin with. So negating that setup with another all-encompassing, abrupt solution just doesn't do it for me. At the risk of starting a religious debate... it's kind of like how you'd first have to buy in that God condemns everyone to death (at best, or Hell depending on your denomination) as a default state. Personally I’m very receptive to and often very much enjoy stories that plunge characters in dark places. It rather goes hand in hand with caring deeply about the possibility of redemption that one would also be particularly critical or focused on one’s own ‘sins’ (see the Biblical notion of original sin). Whereas more ‘secular’ views are often more optimistic about fundamental human nature (Locke & Hobbes). That self-flagellating albino Dan Brown creates in his book The Da Vinci Code comes to mind. That’s kind of how I imagine non-Christians think about Christians who take the ideas of fire and brimstone seriously. Everything you said fits perfectly under that model. |
Oct 1, 2022 12:28 AM
#31
Madoka is this story with tons of elements that ‘go down more smoothly’ if you grew up in a traditional religious matrix. One great example is the way Sayaka responds when she learns the truth of the Soul Gems. Somebody upthread (I think it was Recynon actually) mentioned how with their upbringing Sayaka’s response makes no sense to them. And I can see how somebody could think that. But with my more traditional upbringing and the ideas about the nature of souls, their instantiation into the body, and what souls represent in my culture Sayaka’s response makes 100% sense. And when I saw Recynon’s initial comment I thought about trying to explain that and realized I probably couldn’t. It’s like, just this big cultural disconnect in how one sees the world. For both of us it’s ‘obvious.’ So for Recynon Sayaka is an extremely poorly written character, and for me I feel Sayaka is literally the best-written character I have seen in anime. Is there a way to ‘bridge that gap?’ If there is, I don’t know what it would be. |
Oct 1, 2022 1:47 AM
#32
ScionOfCyan said: JustOscar said: Interesting. I had never thought about the apple being a reference to the forbidden fruit. But I don’t understand why would Kyoko give Sayaka the fruit of knowledge of good and evil. It seems to me that she already knows the difference between good and evil. In fact, she knows it too well. I would rather say that Kyoko is offering her the fruit of forgetfulness of good and evil. She is offering her a step backwards, because she has lost faith and thinks that ahead there is nothing but an abyss. My take on this aspect of Sayaka is a little odd and very involved so it will definitely take a full essay to build up the structure that underpins all my thoughts. ScionOfCyan said: JustOscar said: I will say that as a Christian, there was no confusion whatsoever about Madoka becoming Madokami, because the buildup and symbolism made it all make perfect sense to me if I simply understood Madoka as an allegory for a Christ-figure. There's no friction in my mental models for that whatsoever, it all fits perfectly. So perhaps Madoka Magica was too uniquely suited to Christians and that means it's actually not accessible to everybody. Edited to put all the images in a spoiler tag. I think someone who believes in the possibility of a miracle is more open to accept a deus ex machina. In fact, even though there are people who think that a deus ex machina is always a bad element in a story, there are others who actually prefer it. It mostly matters most whether it fits thematically or in the message. Contra what person said upthread Madoka Magica foreshadows what is going on with Madoka and her wish pretty copiously in episodes 1-8. Idk, maybe I was low IQ, high EQ, low T, high E, and failed to miss some obvious 'she will become a god' foreshadowing at 12:53 in episode 7. But as I said, much of that symbolism was recognizable to me in the context of a Christian cultural background, perhaps that person does not have that knowledge. For me, it largely couldn't ever "come out of the blue," which is why the phrase 'deus ex machina' doesn't apply too well to how I personally experienced the story.Obviously, religious symbolism can add a touch of grandness to a story, but if it's out of nowhere (like Madoka) However, episodes 9-11 had a lot of dubious content that mixed up and jumbled up that thematic content. I think a lot of the stuff about entropy and Homura's parallel timelines and 'karmic weight' is seriously detrimental to the story precisely because it clashes symbolically with this previously established foundation and when they jump from scientism eschatology back to Christian eschatology all of a sudden it's very jarring. Madoka Magica is a lot better if they cut out all the sci fi and replace it with more material that's character focused, for example, more scenes showing us the mind of Homura, since she's a wonderful character and Urobuchi/Shinbo kind of hide her true thoughts from all of us for some reason. They run into a big mistake of deciding to explain the 'why' behind a large number of magical elements. The 'why' of magic in your story is totally irrelevant, it adds nothing. Tolkien doesn't explain the scientific 'why' behind Gandalf's magic, Monogatari doesn't explain the 'why' behind its supernatural elements using a scientific epistemology (at least not in the two seasons I watched) etc etc. Good shows about magic don't need to do this. What matters is whatever that magic allegorizes. It really doesn't matter 'why' Madoka is capable of making a cosmic altering wish, it's magic. What matters is the meaning behind the wish or the meaning that conveyed by the consequences of the wish. In terms of meaning it all makes sense. But when you spend 3 episodes talking about entropy and parallel timelines, you put the entire audience into rational-logico mental modes of thought. And then they all get blindsided. It's rather a bad mistake, honestly. Eps 9-12 are significantly worse than Eps 1-8. It's kind of disappointing because eps 1-8 are totally, nonsensically good. Like, there's a good chance I never see another anime that surpasses the heights of Eps. 1-8 for the rest of my life. But I guess it makes sense that continuing to clear such a high bar is really hard. Ig, the sci-fi element was there to engage viewers who're not familiar with all the religious elements, because it wasn't until it kicked in at 9th or so episode, that I actually got interested to proceed any further. Until then, I only thought I'm just watching a dark show with magical girls in it and I haven't caught any of these religious symbols you've been pointing out because I'm not familiar with any of it. And to people who pointed it about, yeah, it's not really a happy ending. I just blurted it out because I kinda remember coming out of the show with some positive feeling (It's been more than a year I've watched this and the movie, so I kinda forgot many details about the show). |
Oct 1, 2022 2:01 AM
#33
R_2_R said: Yeah that makes sense. It’s really interesting to me how people can ‘see’ two different things when it’s the same thing. Consciousness is crazy ScionOfCyan said: JustOscar said: Interesting. I had never thought about the apple being a reference to the forbidden fruit. But I don’t understand why would Kyoko give Sayaka the fruit of knowledge of good and evil. It seems to me that she already knows the difference between good and evil. In fact, she knows it too well. I would rather say that Kyoko is offering her the fruit of forgetfulness of good and evil. She is offering her a step backwards, because she has lost faith and thinks that ahead there is nothing but an abyss. My take on this aspect of Sayaka is a little odd and very involved so it will definitely take a full essay to build up the structure that underpins all my thoughts. ScionOfCyan said: JustOscar said: I will say that as a Christian, there was no confusion whatsoever about Madoka becoming Madokami, because the buildup and symbolism made it all make perfect sense to me if I simply understood Madoka as an allegory for a Christ-figure. There's no friction in my mental models for that whatsoever, it all fits perfectly. So perhaps Madoka Magica was too uniquely suited to Christians and that means it's actually not accessible to everybody. Edited to put all the images in a spoiler tag. I think someone who believes in the possibility of a miracle is more open to accept a deus ex machina. In fact, even though there are people who think that a deus ex machina is always a bad element in a story, there are others who actually prefer it. It mostly matters most whether it fits thematically or in the message. Contra what person said upthread Madoka Magica foreshadows what is going on with Madoka and her wish pretty copiously in episodes 1-8. Idk, maybe I was low IQ, high EQ, low T, high E, and failed to miss some obvious 'she will become a god' foreshadowing at 12:53 in episode 7. Obviously, religious symbolism can add a touch of grandness to a story, but if it's out of nowhere (like Madoka) However, episodes 9-11 had a lot of dubious content that mixed up and jumbled up that thematic content. I think a lot of the stuff about entropy and Homura's parallel timelines and 'karmic weight' is seriously detrimental to the story precisely because it clashes symbolically with this previously established foundation and when they jump from scientism eschatology back to Christian eschatology all of a sudden it's very jarring. Madoka Magica is a lot better if they cut out all the sci fi and replace it with more material that's character focused, for example, more scenes showing us the mind of Homura, since she's a wonderful character and Urobuchi/Shinbo kind of hide her true thoughts from all of us for some reason. They run into a big mistake of deciding to explain the 'why' behind a large number of magical elements. The 'why' of magic in your story is totally irrelevant, it adds nothing. Tolkien doesn't explain the scientific 'why' behind Gandalf's magic, Monogatari doesn't explain the 'why' behind its supernatural elements using a scientific epistemology (at least not in the two seasons I watched) etc etc. Good shows about magic don't need to do this. What matters is whatever that magic allegorizes. It really doesn't matter 'why' Madoka is capable of making a cosmic altering wish, it's magic. What matters is the meaning behind the wish or the meaning that conveyed by the consequences of the wish. In terms of meaning it all makes sense. But when you spend 3 episodes talking about entropy and parallel timelines, you put the entire audience into rational-logico mental modes of thought. And then they all get blindsided. It's rather a bad mistake, honestly. Eps 9-12 are significantly worse than Eps 1-8. It's kind of disappointing because eps 1-8 are totally, nonsensically good. Like, there's a good chance I never see another anime that surpasses the heights of Eps. 1-8 for the rest of my life. But I guess it makes sense that continuing to clear such a high bar is really hard. Ig, the sci-fi element was there to engage viewers who're not familiar with all the religious elements, because it wasn't until it kicked in at 9th or so episode, that I actually got interested to proceed any further. Until then, I only thought I'm just watching a dark show with magical girls in it and I haven't caught any of these religious symbols you've been pointing out because I'm not familiar with any of it. And to people who pointed it about, yeah, it's not really a happy ending. I just blurted it out because I kinda remember coming out of the show with some positive feeling (It's been more than a year I've watched this and the movie, so I kinda forgot many details about the show). |
Oct 1, 2022 2:05 AM
#34
The answer is a no, but it is an addition. it's the bonus, not the reward. the desert, not the main course. In madoka's case there are a lot of other reasons why it is well written which would take WAY too long to fully explain, so I will just say this... the story of madoka hasn't even ended yet. rebellion is a direct sequel and there is a movie coming that takes place after it. you say yourself that the ending makes sense in theory, so calling it an asspull is objectively wrong, now that said, I do see why it wouldn't be satisfying. but them again, it's not really the ending, it could have been, but it's not. |
Also available at: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCK8spdL1M_J-z0vO2C7jPLw Why You Should Watch Akudama Drive: https://youtu.be/Yw0r52wRjgA An AMV I that I spend way too much time on: A Love Letter To Anime「AMV」: https://youtu.be/YQyqxFM2m9Q My referral code to a website/app that gives you free money (a few cents a day) by using a few megabytes of your internet for file sharing. We both get a bonus if you use my link: https://r.honeygain.me/ARSHIA7942 |
Oct 1, 2022 2:13 AM
#35
"Does an Anime/Manga that retells or uses a certain religious/spiritual story makes it a well written?" Not necessarily. It has to do sth with it like maybe through foreshadowing by showing them those symbols/references HIDING the meaning behind which'll only make sense after figuring out what they are and/or what they mean. If, they show the symbols and has no meaning whatsoever no matter how much you try to make sense then there's nothing well written about it. It just adds to the show's style but not the writing. |
Oct 1, 2022 2:42 AM
#36
Considering everyone gave a pretty similar answer, "It doesn't matter if it has no depth/meaning to it". How exactly can you tell if a particular symbolism doesn't have a meaning and on what basis (any examples, if you can add)? |
Oct 1, 2022 8:14 AM
#37
ScionOfCyan said: This is an interesting way of putting it and I think potentially has a lot of truth to it. Personally I’m very receptive to and often very much enjoy stories that plunge characters in dark places. It rather goes hand in hand with caring deeply about the possibility of redemption that one would also be particularly critical or focused on one’s own ‘sins’ (see the Biblical notion of original sin). Whereas more ‘secular’ views are often more optimistic about fundamental human nature (Locke & Hobbes). That self-flagellating albino Dan Brown creates in his book The Da Vinci Code comes to mind. That’s kind of how I imagine non-Christians think about Christians who take the ideas of fire and brimstone seriously. Everything you said fits perfectly under that model. You talk as if other types of stories don't plunge characters into dark places and/or that people like me don't like Madoka Magica because it supposedly does so. Madoka Magica's darkness is skin deep because for me the characters don't really take a plunge so much as we're told they fell into despair because the story says so. This has less to do with whether or not one likes showing the ugly psychological side of characters and more to do with executing this properly. I also find the notion that secular views are generally more optimistic to be inexact. Rather I'd say that a secular viewpoint allows for a deeper, more nuanced viewpoint of human nature that potentially allows for an actual investigation into the so-called dark parts of human nature without grouping all those dark-parts under the label of sin and natural human wretchedness. Furthermore, just like with before, I can also flip it around and say that secular viewpoints are less optimistic than a typical Christian viewpoint because it doesn't necessarily believe in a world where everyone is forgiven and gets eternal life for simply believing in something. If you're a Christian, in most denominations, you probably believe in the possibility that you'll get a life after death, which is pretty optimistic. Along those lines, you say that the notion of original sin allows for the possibility of a redemption. A lot of Christians find this redemption an appealing concept, but respectfully, I don't see much value or beauty in such a one-dimensional redemption that solves all problems in one fell swoop. In terms of storytelling most people would agree that an instant redemption is not satisfying nor earned. Same thing goes for Madoka Magica; if you're going to make everything unilaterally bad, and then suddenly flip it, that holds little meaning. "That self-flagellating albino Dan Brown creates in his book The Da Vinci Code comes to mind. That’s kind of how I imagine non-Christians think about Christians who take the ideas of fire and brimstone seriously. Everything you said fits perfectly under that model." I haven't read that book, and I'm not sure how what I said fits into that example. Respectfully, you also don't need to keep assuming that most people are non-Christians and/or that non-Christians wouldn't have exposure to and knowledge of Christianity and the Bible. I've had weekly Bible studies since I was a kid and I've interacted with different strains of Christianity. A lot of atheists/agnostics are people who grew up in a Christian environment. I don't claim to be an expert on Christianity but I've had a decent amount of exposure to it. The degree to which Christians are focused on their sin and their punishment in Hell varies across the denominations. Some groups, like the Jehovah's Witnesses, don't even teach Hell, but at the same time they focus more on doing good works as the key to salvation, hence their stricter lifestyle codes. Other groups are more lax, and even though they teach Hell, the barrier to salvation is low in that all you need to do to be saved is to simply believe. But all that still rests upon the fundamental tenet of Christianity that people are pretty much guilty until proven innocent; I don't mean to imply that this necessarily means intense self-punishment but simply that for the purposes of storytelling, this simplified one-size fits all, one-sided narrative doesn't make for a good premise. ScionOfCyan said: Madoka is this story with tons of elements that ‘go down more smoothly’ if you grew up in a traditional religious matrix. One great example is the way Sayaka responds when she learns the truth of the Soul Gems. Somebody upthread (I think it was Recynon actually) mentioned how with their upbringing Sayaka’s response makes no sense to them. And I can see how somebody could think that. But with my more traditional upbringing and the ideas about the nature of souls, their instantiation into the body, and what souls represent in my culture Sayaka’s response makes 100% sense. And when I saw Recynon’s initial comment I thought about trying to explain that and realized I probably couldn’t. It’s like, just this big cultural disconnect in how one sees the world. For both of us it’s ‘obvious.’ So for Recynon Sayaka is an extremely poorly written character, and for me I feel Sayaka is literally the best-written character I have seen in anime. Is there a way to ‘bridge that gap?’ If there is, I don’t know what it would be. So yeah, given my background, the cultural disconnect is not the issue. Even if I wasn't, the religious fanatic is a common trope. In fact, I myself surmised that a good explanation for Sayaka's behavior is if she was raised in a fundamentalist Christian household. This would've made her character arc well-written, bridging the gap, as you say, if they had actually bothered to show it. This is a problem with basically all of the show's characters: they don't bother explaining stuff and leave the viewer to fill in the holes. You're doing the same thing that the article I linked is doing: using outside knowledge to justify how well-written a character is, based on little clues in their behavior that MIGHT support that interpretation but just as easily could not. You don't know for sure that Sayaka did what she did because of some religious background ingraining ideas of a pure soul in her head. It's a likely explanation, but for all we know concretely, she's just a regular Japanese school girl (and btw, Christianity is not as big in Japan so we have even less reason to believe that that's her background). So unless you believe that Japanese teenagers, through the normal course of their upbringing in Japan, develop ideas about the purity of the soul, no, Sayaka's arc is not well-written and it's rather under-written. To give you a further example that also shows my familiarity with similar religious doctrines, the Jehovah's Witnesses believe that blood is sacred, and thus will refuse blood transactions even in life-threatening situations. However, if I saw a character that is characterized as just a normal person in regular modern society, with no reference to religion, refuse blood transactions in a movie because they believe it would make them impure, leading to a major character's death, I would call that forced and jarring writing. I'd say that the writer wanted to force the death and couldn't come up with a better way of doing so. Furthermore, even if you mention in passing that Sayaka was raised in a fundamentalist Christian household, her descent into suicidal despair still would've happened way too fast and not enough attention was devoted to her character, such that her arc would've remained mostly superficial. Once you get past that, all the story would've managed to do was trick a teenage girl into doing something that goes against her religious beliefs. The main theme there would be deception; Sayaka wouldn't have made the same decisions if she knew the full story. This is as opposed to letting her know everything from the start and showing her struggle between wanting to make her wish come true and staying true to her religious beliefs. |
RecynonOct 1, 2022 8:28 AM
Oct 1, 2022 8:17 AM
#38
No, it just depends how it’s done. If it’s done well it’s one way to add extra layers to a story but if poorly done it actually subtracts from it by lacking originality. |
Oct 1, 2022 11:21 AM
#39
@Recynon it doesn’t really matter if one has no exposure or has copious exposure and chooses to reject the worldview. It all redounds to the same thing. One’s worldview and beliefs have a significant impact on how they interpret anything they perceive. However, I did make assumptions based on the fact that it didn’t sound to me like you understand these ideas well. Since my implicit condescension in that regard led you to such a long response, I apologize for my forwardness. I tend to be blunt on the internet. I could write essays and essays on minutiae of Sayaka’s character, and probably eventually will, in the future. I can ping you when I finish them, if you like. Unfortunately I don’t feel driven to continue a discussion on the points you’ve raised in this thread at this point in time. I’m sorry if that’s disappointing. |
Oct 1, 2022 12:13 PM
#40
JustOscar said: ScionOfCyan said: Madoka is this story with tons of elements that ‘go down more smoothly’ if you grew up in a traditional religious matrix. One great example is the way Sayaka responds when she learns the truth of the Soul Gems. Somebody upthread (I think it was Recynon actually) mentioned how with their upbringing Sayaka’s response makes no sense to them. And I can see how somebody could think that. But with my more traditional upbringing and the ideas about the nature of souls, their instantiation into the body, and what souls represent in my culture Sayaka’s response makes 100% sense. And when I saw Recynon’s initial comment I thought about trying to explain that and realized I probably couldn’t. It’s like, just this big cultural disconnect in how one sees the world. For both of us it’s ‘obvious.’ So for Recynon Sayaka is an extremely poorly written character, and for me I feel Sayaka is literally the best-written character I have seen in anime. Is there a way to ‘bridge that gap?’ If there is, I don’t know what it would be. Now that you mention it, I have always found strange how Urobuchi seems to assume that what Kyubey did was an horrible thing. Everyone is in agreement: Sayaka, Madoka, Kyoko (she would later try to adapt in her pragmatical manner, but she got really angry with Kyubey while he was explaining it) and Homura (she has already accepted it, but goes to tell how Kyubey doesn't understand human values, i. e. this feeling about the soul is supposed to be a universal human value). So Urobuchi seems to assume it is a universal feeling, the "default state". Sayaka is expected to react not like someone brought up in a Christian environment, or a religious environment, but to react as every human should react. Of course, after this "universal basic feeling", she reacts further in an individual manner by being unable to accept it, while Kyoko and Homura could. But everyone of them find it instinctively horrible. Since for some viewers (if not most) it is not instantly obvious why Sayaka feels like that, it's natural that for them the character is not "explained enough", myself included. About whether Sayaka is a well written character, I think the writing of a character should be divided in two different writings. One is how the author has written, in a vague form, the character in his head. The other is the execution, how they put that character in a concrete form in a concrete plot. I personally find the aforesaid flaw in Sayaka's execution. It is not that I don't understand her feelings (at least I think do), but that I think that the given explanation of her feelings fails to actually explain them. Urobuchi couldn't quite put into words (or into a story) the character he had in his head. In any case, as you said, I think whether we think a character is well written or not depends on how much we understand (or feel we understand) them. The less one understand a character, the more likely is one to think that their behaviour or decisions make no sense, and that their situations and dialogues are forced, unnatural or unrealistic. Yes, this is exactly it. I may have poisoned the well by saying it was necessarily 'religious' or 'Christian' in nature. I think this sense of a 'self' that is somehow independent of the body in some fundamental way tends to be the default way humans process the world across history. And this rationalist or Enlightenment way of thinking which makes people feel confused about Sayaka's behavior is a relatively recent phenomenon. Or perhaps, it has appeared time and again throughout history and cultures which have that way of thinking were outcompeted by cultures that don't. I checked Urobuchi's age and he's almost 50 now. Certain cultural aspects have changed dramatically in a way that affects how millenials and younger see the world, but Urobuchi appears to (at least in this instance) assume 'the old view' as basically an axiom of how everybody sees the world. And I see the world that way, just as he does. |
Oct 1, 2022 12:34 PM
#41
Oct 1, 2022 12:41 PM
#42
ScionOfCyan said: JustOscar said: ScionOfCyan said: Madoka is this story with tons of elements that ‘go down more smoothly’ if you grew up in a traditional religious matrix. One great example is the way Sayaka responds when she learns the truth of the Soul Gems. Somebody upthread (I think it was Recynon actually) mentioned how with their upbringing Sayaka’s response makes no sense to them. And I can see how somebody could think that. But with my more traditional upbringing and the ideas about the nature of souls, their instantiation into the body, and what souls represent in my culture Sayaka’s response makes 100% sense. And when I saw Recynon’s initial comment I thought about trying to explain that and realized I probably couldn’t. It’s like, just this big cultural disconnect in how one sees the world. For both of us it’s ‘obvious.’ So for Recynon Sayaka is an extremely poorly written character, and for me I feel Sayaka is literally the best-written character I have seen in anime. Is there a way to ‘bridge that gap?’ If there is, I don’t know what it would be. Now that you mention it, I have always found strange how Urobuchi seems to assume that what Kyubey did was an horrible thing. Everyone is in agreement: Sayaka, Madoka, Kyoko (she would later try to adapt in her pragmatical manner, but she got really angry with Kyubey while he was explaining it) and Homura (she has already accepted it, but goes to tell how Kyubey doesn't understand human values, i. e. this feeling about the soul is supposed to be a universal human value). So Urobuchi seems to assume it is a universal feeling, the "default state". Sayaka is expected to react not like someone brought up in a Christian environment, or a religious environment, but to react as every human should react. Of course, after this "universal basic feeling", she reacts further in an individual manner by being unable to accept it, while Kyoko and Homura could. But everyone of them find it instinctively horrible. Since for some viewers (if not most) it is not instantly obvious why Sayaka feels like that, it's natural that for them the character is not "explained enough", myself included. About whether Sayaka is a well written character, I think the writing of a character should be divided in two different writings. One is how the author has written, in a vague form, the character in his head. The other is the execution, how they put that character in a concrete form in a concrete plot. I personally find the aforesaid flaw in Sayaka's execution. It is not that I don't understand her feelings (at least I think do), but that I think that the given explanation of her feelings fails to actually explain them. Urobuchi couldn't quite put into words (or into a story) the character he had in his head. In any case, as you said, I think whether we think a character is well written or not depends on how much we understand (or feel we understand) them. The less one understand a character, the more likely is one to think that their behaviour or decisions make no sense, and that their situations and dialogues are forced, unnatural or unrealistic. Yes, this is exactly it. I may have poisoned the well by saying it was necessarily 'religious' or 'Christian' in nature. I think this sense of a 'self' that is somehow independent of the body in some fundamental way tends to be the default way humans process the world across history. And this rationalist or Enlightenment way of thinking which makes people feel confused about Sayaka's behavior is a relatively recent phenomenon. Or perhaps, it has appeared time and again throughout history and cultures which have that way of thinking were outcompeted by cultures that don't. I checked Urobuchi's age and he's almost 50 now. Certain cultural aspects have changed dramatically in a way that affects how millenials and younger see the world, but Urobuchi appears to (at least in this instance) assume 'the old view' as basically an axiom of how everybody sees the world. And I see the world that way, just as he does. The way I see it, all the best aspects of Sayaka's character are highly unrelated to the way she reacts to this new 'zombiedom' and that response doesn't really matter all that much. Which is why I'm reticent to discuss that nitpick further other than to say that I think being confused by it is a minority view, and to describe the cultures that do or don't hold it in an abstract way, and then move on. Maybe to keep in mind: (1) Homura's time loops make it pretty clear Hitomi always 'gets the guy' (2) Madoka Magica takes special care to establish that Hitomi is more attractive than Sayaka from the very beginning (that love letter is not a throwaway) (3) People often use a sour grapes (fox parable) justification for why they don't actually want what they do want. Sayaka might say she can't pursue Kamijou because of the Soul Gem but it could very well be the case she is just using that as justification for some other reason like feeling she has no chance or wanting to be selfless yet again. (4) Sayaka's witch form strongly implies that whatever her response to her 'zombiedom', her disappointment at not getting what she wants with Kamijou likely plays a very large role in her trauma and descent, and I think that's something we can all understand. And, related to (3), part of Sayaka's brilliant construction has to do with the fact that she's always lying to herself. I'll cover that more on my own in my blogpost but if you ever rewatch the show, I'd recommend looking out for it, you might notice it yourself. EDIT for addition: Madoka Magica makes it super clear that Sayaka's biggest flaw manifests specifically in the way she handles her desire for Kamijou. Mami warns her about it, Kyouko warns her about it, Kyouko offers to do something about it in a very shocking manner, Madoka Magica shows us that Sayaka already is starting to sense that she made a mistake the very day she makes her wish and also the day after (if you didn't notice this, look closer). The zombie stuff is just another straw on the back of a camel which has already been weighed down to a breaking point by this much more important facet of her arc. |
ScionOfCyanOct 1, 2022 1:45 PM
Oct 1, 2022 2:52 PM
#43
@ScionOfCyan "it doesn’t really matter if one has no exposure or has copious exposure and chooses to reject the worldview. It all redounds to the same thing. One’s worldview and beliefs have a significant impact on how they interpret anything they perceive." Yeah but you were saying that I only perceive Sayaka to be a poorly written character because I don't have exposure to a certain worldview. And clearly, regardless of whether or not I agree with a particular worldview, I can at least understand where a character is coming from based on my knowledge of that worldview. So let me reiterate, in this case, the viewer's personal beliefs are not the issue and it's the show's fault that there's any confusion. "However, I did make assumptions based on the fact that it didn’t sound to me like you understand these ideas well. Since my implicit condescension in that regard led you to such a long response, I apologize for my forwardness. I tend to be blunt on the internet. I could write essays and essays on minutiae of Sayaka’s character, and probably eventually will, in the future. I can ping you when I finish them, if you like. Unfortunately I don’t feel driven to continue a discussion on the points you’ve raised in this thread at this point in time. I’m sorry if that’s disappointing." Sure, and if you want, you can continue the discussion in my profile comments. "Yes, this is exactly it. I may have poisoned the well by saying it was necessarily 'religious' or 'Christian' in nature. I think this sense of a 'self' that is somehow independent of the body in some fundamental way tends to be the default way humans process the world across history. And this rationalist or Enlightenment way of thinking which makes people feel confused about Sayaka's behavior is a relatively recent phenomenon. Or perhaps, it has appeared time and again throughout history and cultures which have that way of thinking were outcompeted by cultures that don't. I checked Urobuchi's age and he's almost 50 now. Certain cultural aspects have changed dramatically in a way that affects how millenials and younger see the world, but Urobuchi appears to (at least in this instance) assume 'the old view' as basically an axiom of how everybody sees the world. And I see the world that way, just as he does." The time period Urobuchi grew up in has nothing to do with it. Even if he was a 100 years old his view would be outdated by several centuries, not to mention the fact that Christianity is not nearly as big in Japan compared to the west. And from what I know the east is less concerned with precise definitions of the mind, body, and soul. Even if Urobuchi sees the world in an old-fashioned way, he'd surely realize that most of the world doesn't see things that way and since he's writing a story in a modern setting, it is his obligation to set up Sayaka's background to fit with her niche worldview. Also, the other characters, including the main character, were fine with the soul thing, so it's not like he wrote the story in a certain worldview. Furthermore, the evidence from his other works and his interviews strongly suggests that his viewpoint is more precisely about subverting ideals in general, whatever those ideals might be. So he's not limited to talking about medieval Christian ideals or whatever. Concerning your analysis of Sayaka: It's not hard to understand a girl being upset or even depressed that her crush won't like her back. That much is obvious. This kind of stuff happens all the time for people around her age. Which is also what makes it jarring that Sayaka descends so quickly into suicidal despair for this reason, because this seems like a greatly exaggerated reaction compared to what happens in real life. Especially since she didn't even get an actual rejection from him. So either way you cut it, it's underwritten--- if you go with the religious fanatic angle, the show doesn't write that background, and if you go with the rejected teenage girl angle as the main impetus, the show doesn't give us a particular reason for such a large reaction from her. You can go and find clues that she's lying to herself but that wouldn't negate the fact that there's little indication of mental instability to the point of self-destruction prior to her finding out about the soul thing. People lie to themselves all the time, but that doesn't necessarily mean they self-destruct after disappointment hits them. Also if by lying to herself, you mean that she tells herself she's doing something altruistic but she's actually doing it for selfish reasons, yeah, I get that too. It's still hard for me to see how this alone connects to suicidal despair. Maybe if the show had bothered to spend the time to show that Sayaka already had fragile self-esteem, beforehand, that would work. I can come up with a bunch of different explanations for her behavior, but that's basically me doing the author's work for him. And remember, it's not just Sayaka's situation that reflects this pattern of exaggerated character behavior with little explanation; Kyouko's father also reacts disproportionately, Homura develops an unshakable love for Madoka after like 2 days, and we're told every witch in history has suffered some bad fate in one form or another. So when you take into account the context, it becomes increasingly hard to buy into the fact that any individual character arc happened in a natural way; my suspension of disbelief has been broken as a viewer. |
RecynonOct 1, 2022 3:22 PM
Oct 1, 2022 3:29 PM
#44
Recynon said: @ScionOfCyan Sure, and if you want, you can continue the discussion in my profile comments. Which is also what makes it jarring that Sayaka descends so quickly into suicidal despair for this reason, because this seems like a greatly exaggerated reaction compared to what happens in real life. Also if by lying to herself, you mean that she tells herself she's doing something altruistic but she's actually doing it for selfish reasons, yeah, I get that too. It's still hard for me to see how this alone connects to suicidal despair. Maybe if the show had bothered to spend the time to show that Sayaka already had fragile self-esteem, beforehand, that would work. I can come up with a bunch of different explanations for her behavior, but that's basically me doing the author's work for him. And remember, it's not just Sayaka's situation that reflects this pattern of exaggerated character behavior with little explanation; Kyouko's father also reacts disproportionately, Homura develops an unshakable love for Madoka after like 2 days, and we're told every witch in history has suffered some bad fate in one form or another. So when you take into account the context, it becomes increasingly hard to buy into the fact that any individual character arc happened in a natural way; my suspension of disbelief has been broken as a viewer. Okay, I'll keep you in mind to ping on this in the future. A lot of the analytical thought I have done on aspects of this story but haven't put into words yet will relate to some of these ideas mentioned. I'd prefer to put in the work to make those thoughts well-written and compact. If I stream of consciousness it out right now I won't be satisfied that I presented the picture well. |
Oct 1, 2022 3:55 PM
#45
Absolutely not. In fact, in my opinion, it seems like the person you was trying too hard to read between the lines of Madoka for a symbol that does not meaningfully exist, or at best, shows no signs of having been put there intentionally by the writers to make any sort of point. I also find it really funny that you bring up the symbolism in NGE because the authors have outright stated that they had put the Christian symbolism there to make it look cool and nothing more. In fact, I think they even went as far as to say that had they known how popular NGE would've gotten, they would've thought twice about including it. |
ParataxicalisOct 1, 2022 3:58 PM
More topics from this board
Poll: » Bare feet or pantyhoses?Absurdo_N - 9 hours ago |
21 |
by Ex-Aid
»»
3 minutes ago |
|
» Credit cards companies are forcing the Hentai industryDije - 11 hours ago |
45 |
by traed
»»
4 minutes ago |
|
» Early-mid 2000s anime – what are your thoughts?Haneken2086 - 5 hours ago |
5 |
by Ex-Aid
»»
4 minutes ago |
|
» Things you are jealous of in animeIpreferEcchi - Apr 20 |
43 |
by Jutrio
»»
11 minutes ago |
|
Poll: » Interest and hobbies change with timenishant0 - 9 hours ago |
31 |
by Jutrio
»»
13 minutes ago |