Is 1 a more extreme score than 10.

ChouEritto said:
And yet you said quite clearly "no anime should be rated a 1 or 10" which is a definitive statement rather than a personal opinion, thus providing cognitive dissonance to your point. How people tend to ignore the guideline of what constitutes a certain score is not just irrelevant to the system itself when all it means are that many are using it incorrectly, but bringing it up to prove any sort of point despite you being very definitive in your initial point makes it doubly flawed. Either everyone has their own standard and the rating doesn't matter (as long as there's a clear consensus on what counts as good or bad) or there's a rigid standard to be used (of which there obviously isn't much to support as you even admit there's no universal standard).

Along with this being an assumption, it does nothing to support your point when all it speaks about is how someone would personally go about rating a work and would require genuine examples to be proven. Again, how one person interprets what a 1/10 represents may not be the same for another, making the idea that "nothing should be a 1/10" very silly.

Again, that's by your standard, not a universal one and certainly not MAL's with the very broad definition it gives, thereby making this point moot when speaking definitively as you are here.

This is one thing that certainly isn't subjective. It's extremely easy to see if a story is poorly written by judging its internal consistency based on the rules and internal logic it applies and how well it sticks to them.

And yet you said quite clearly "no anime should be rated a 1 or 10" which is a definitive statement rather than a personal opinion, thus providing cognitive dissonance to your point.

Again, that's by your standard, not a universal one and certainly not MAL's with the very broad definition it gives, thereby making this point moot when speaking definitively as you are here.

This is one thing that certainly isn't subjective. It's extremely easy to see if a story is poorly written by judging its internal consistency based on the rules and internal logic it applies and how well it sticks to them.

JanPri said:
I know you're trying to sound very smart and all that, but why would you quote me again when I said "I think we can agree to disagree"?

I've just written what I thought and so I think it should be obvious it's my opinion. Or do I have to write "This is just my opinion and I have no credibility that would make my word an absolute objective truth" or something like that at the end of my every post???

If you would ever tried to write a review you'd might notice there are scores for every aspect of the anime and thus it's kinda logical (oh, I almost forgot, this is just my personal opinion and I have no credibility that would make my word an absolute objective truth) to think you are supposed to use the scoring system like that

If this is indeed the case then how would you explain the fact there are multiple literary critics and reviewers whose opinions very often (usually every time) widely divide when it comes to judging of a particular work?