Forum SettingsEpisode Information
Forums
Toilet-bound Hanako-kun
Available on Manga Store
New
Pages (3) « 1 2 [3]
Apr 25, 2020 12:26 AM
Offline
Mar 2016
207
momoka16 said:
Cavendish-san said:



Wtf is this comparing about??
You want to tell that Haikyuu is same show with Yuri on Ice? or Blend S is same show with Somali or Barakamon??

There are bunch of dudes, so that show was just for fujoshi..
Because the main lead is young girl, so both was just for lolicon
??

Haikyuu has many BL fanfic. Yes. But that didnt mean it was fujobait. Same with this..

You have problem with the art style?? If you say this has fujobait (like kou and mitsuba thing) maybe i will be agree, but this is not shotacon bait.
What is wrong to have different art style? Her art style is unique than other artist. You can spot her art immediately when you see that. There are so many effort to make stylish art that you only person have that style. Panel art is so detail in manga and deep color. And it need long time to get that style. Even the studio and staff was making all effort just to match her style but so lacking in animation

If you say this is shotacon because of the art style. You just insult illustratorthat has stylish art. And AidaIro is one of best illustator in manga industry..

Just go back to your lolicon show that has copy paste character design


I agree absolutely with you, he doesn't make any sense.


If I may interject, the point being made is that 90% of the character designs are Loli/shotas, and therefore are more likely to appeal to people with such kinks/interests. Same as how the internet became obsessed with Judy Hopps from Zootopia for a while. That movie was marketed towards a family audience, but the character designs also drew attention from the furry community. They were no less fans of the movie, and in some senses even more devoted to the source material.

I don't really see a reason for all this kink-shaming to be going on. I mean so long as everything in real life is between consenting adults, who really cares; am I right? It makes no difference in my life. It's like if people find one of your family members attractive... If other people think your sister's hot, that has absolutely nothing to do with you. It doesn't mean you agree with them. Even if you did, I honestly wouldn't care as long as you were consenting adults.

People you don't like are going to like the same things as you. It's just a fact of life. They aren't a representation of the artist's feelings anymore than your own. I mean generally speaking, even in the presence of excessive fan-service, people aren't setting out to make porn unless they are explicitly making porn. The primary goal is still to entertain rather than satiate lustful fantasy.

I honestly think this anime is pretty bad, and my post was originally going to be how this fails as a decent shoujo Moe blob in my eyes... But everyone's opinion is different. It's perfectly okay for you to like this, and it's perfectly okay to like Monogotari. This is a very silly thing to rage about, and I guarantee you'll feel better if you stop worrying about the things you enjoy having some unintended nefarious reflection on your character.

But yeah... Bad characters, boring plot, uncanny valley levels of cuteness, both too little and too much fan-service to keep things fun, really wanted to like this with the edgy atmosphere, but I don't.

P.S. Also hate to break this to you, but thought crime is wrong. You can have thoughts and not desire to act them out in the real world. You can even have more extreme fantasies and choose to role-play them with an adult partner. Kink-shaming is bad, mmmkay
DarkdaxterApr 25, 2020 12:32 AM
Apr 25, 2020 1:43 AM
Offline
Jul 2018
564612
Darkdaxter said:
momoka16 said:


I agree absolutely with you, he doesn't make any sense.


If I may interject, the point being made is that 90% of the character designs are Loli/shotas, and therefore are more likely to appeal to people with such kinks/interests. Same as how the internet became obsessed with Judy Hopps from Zootopia for a while. That movie was marketed towards a family audience, but the character designs also drew attention from the furry community. They were no less fans of the movie, and in some senses even more devoted to the source material.

I don't really see a reason for all this kink-shaming to be going on. I mean so long as everything in real life is between consenting adults, who really cares; am I right? It makes no difference in my life. It's like if people find one of your family members attractive... If other people think your sister's hot, that has absolutely nothing to do with you. It doesn't mean you agree with them. Even if you did, I honestly wouldn't care as long as you were consenting adults.

People you don't like are going to like the same things as you. It's just a fact of life. They aren't a representation of the artist's feelings anymore than your own. I mean generally speaking, even in the presence of excessive fan-service, people aren't setting out to make porn unless they are explicitly making porn. The primary goal is still to entertain rather than satiate lustful fantasy.

I honestly think this anime is pretty bad, and my post was originally going to be how this fails as a decent shoujo Moe blob in my eyes... But everyone's opinion is different. It's perfectly okay for you to like this, and it's perfectly okay to like Monogotari. This is a very silly thing to rage about, and I guarantee you'll feel better if you stop worrying about the things you enjoy having some unintended nefarious reflection on your character.

But yeah... Bad characters, boring plot, uncanny valley levels of cuteness, both too little and too much fan-service to keep things fun, really wanted to like this with the edgy atmosphere, but I don't.

P.S. Also hate to break this to you, but thought crime is wrong. You can have thoughts and not desire to act them out in the real world. You can even have more extreme fantasies and choose to role-play them with an adult partner. Kink-shaming is bad, mmmkay



You can have your personal opinion, like the other guy, but you can't force people to see the things according to your point of view.
If you say that 90% of the characters are "lolis/shotas" as a fact, you are saying something that is obviously WRONG.
Hanako and his twin are supposed to be around 13/14 years old, and shorty. Their character design reflects their age and peculiar characteristics very well. Unlike other male characters in this story, who are handsome and cool, they are supposed to look cute at best and without a flashy presence. Yashiro and Aoi to me look normal 15 years old on the immature looking side, but not all the female characters look like them.These 4 are the only characters that probably, according to your point of view, could fit the definition of "loli/shota", despite I disagree with you. I don't see how characters like Akane, Teru, Kou, Sakura, Natsuhiko, Tsuchigomori, Yako, etc. look "children".
Seriously. You are free to have your opinion about how these characters look, but it's WRONG to say it's a FACT that they look how you are implying.
This isn't a "moeblob shoujo", I never saw this series in this way. I admit this art style works way better in the manga, because I adore the black and white, and also the colored pictures have a very dark tone and atmosphere that the anime missed a bit. In this picture the only "loli character" that I see is Mirai (but more than"loli", I prefer to call her a chibi character)

Honestly I don't see how all the others, including Hanako, look lolis/shotas.
This is how a moeblob show is supposed to look

If you guys can't see the difference, I don't know it. I can see it.
removed-userApr 25, 2020 3:02 AM
Apr 25, 2020 2:30 AM
Offline
Jul 2018
564612
Another clear example of how this manga's art style actually is. In this picture you can clearly to say Tsuchigomori looks like a man in his 30s, Hanako a boy in the middle school.
Kou is the same age as Hanako but he looks a bit more mature than him, since he is taller and more manly.

Every character has his unique looks and the body proportions fit their age.
In real moeablob shows/manga ALL the characters look children.
You can't say the difference between kids and adults. And if you want to force me to say that TBHK art style is the same that you see in typical REAL moeblob manga/anime, it's obvious I can't agree with you. This is like moeblob art style is:

Adults, children, all of them have the same body proportions.
Finally, this manga isn't obviously "moeblob" because of its general topics and violence.
Because of stuff like this:

Plus, it's not obviously a shoujo, because of the general art style. The extreme detailed art style isn't what you find typically in shoujo.
Usually in shoujo you don't even have some kind of background, here the level of detail both in the backgrounds and the character design is always impressive, every panel is a small piece of work:


Probably a different studio could have adapted this manga better. I hope that if a season 2 is made, they are able to adapt its general dark tone way better.
removed-userApr 25, 2020 2:53 AM
Apr 28, 2020 12:27 AM
Offline
Mar 2016
207
momoka16 said:


You are taking stylized images from the manga with the adult characters in them lol. The chibi characters look very young to me, and I am including the background characters. I see a clear difference here from shows like Little Witch Academia, March Comes in Like a Lion, and Steven Universe. The characters in those are chibified to different degrees and look older as opposed to how many anime feature teenagers that look like adults or children.

I would still classify this as Moe given that a very large contribution to the art style and theming strives for cuteness. Just because the other part strives for edgy horror does not exclude it from being Moe. Another anime that attempts to make the violence and horror more striking by contrasting it with Moe elements is Why They Cry.

By your logic, Elaine from Seven Deadly Sins isn't a Loli either since she's 2000 years old. And the point was already made that the bulk of this target audience is young women, and the story heavily revolves around their romance and reverse harem tropes, so I'm not quite sure how you can say this isn't a shojo just because there are action elements. It's like saying you wouldn't find Twilight in the Women's half of the Young Adult section at your local library.

And I explicitly stated that not everyone is going to agree with my opinion. I'm not sure where you are getting the idea that I'm forcing mine on anyone when I said it was fine for you to disagree.

Just because they aren't quite as exaggerated as some shows, does not mean that other characters like Kaede in Rascal Does Not Dream of Bunny Senpai don't fall in that category. It was part of the character design for a reason (cuteness). If you ask me, the vast majority of objects, settings, and background characters that aren't an infected monster to kill are drawn in a very cutesy style. And even when gothic themes are introduced a part of that still shines through. Excluding the two adult apparitions, the majority of the main cast look extremely young. Sure the exorcist has a somewhat older face, but his body is just like the male leads. Really her two older crushes are the only ones who look like actual teenagers. The rest look like preteens at best, when they aren't completely chibi caricatures.

But I mean if you want to argue based on statements of "I prefer to say," and "I never saw it this way," really you're just trying to force your opinion on me, aren't you? At no point did I ever say that that was all there was to the show, quite the opposite really. I grant you that those elements exist, I'm just saying that these do as well. Genres evolve and change and mix as artists try new things.

This just seems like a show to introduce a lot of teenage girls to anime to me, interspersing darker bits to make it look more edgy and mature. That's perfectly fine, and I hope all of them are long-time fans of the medium. If those aren't the perfectly correct descriptors in your opinion, I don't really care. Those elements stuck out to me like an air raid siren the whole time.

P.S. Let's not forget that in the OP 7th Wonder is being molested by his twin brother. Can't imagine why that would draw such people in lol
DarkdaxterApr 28, 2020 12:33 AM
Apr 28, 2020 1:20 AM
Offline
Jul 2018
564612
Darkdaxter said:
momoka16 said:


You are taking stylized images from the manga with the adult characters in them lol. The chibi characters look very young to me, and I am including the background characters.


The only chibi character in that pic is Mirai. The only adults are Yako and Tsuchigomori. Akane is 15 years old but he looks even older than his age. Hanako is 13/14 years old, he is short for his age (around 150 cm) but it's not like he should look 16 years old or 20 years old. He is actually VERY young.


I would still classify this as Moe given that a very large contribution to the art style and theming strives for cuteness. Just because the other part strives for edgy horror does not exclude it from being Moe.


This art style isn't moe, it's a unique mix of creepy/cute.

By your logic, Elaine from Seven Deadly Sins isn't a Loli either since she's 2000 years old.


I don't know that character, but what you are not able to understand is that the only ones who look very young (the Yugi twins, Aoi and Nene), well, are ACTUALLY very young, how are they supposed to look? Like JoJo characters, where teenagers look like people in their 30s?

And the point was already made that the bulk of this target audience is young women, and the story heavily revolves around their romance and reverse harem tropes, so I'm not quite sure how you can say this isn't a shojo just because there are action elements.


This isn't a reverse harem. There are only two guys interested in the female protagonist, how can you call this "harem"? At the beginning Hanako wasn't even in love with Yashiro, but you can't know it, obviously, since you don't read the manga. His flirting with her had nothing to do with romance.
And this isn't obviously a shoujo since it's different from a shoujo manga under many points of view.


And I explicitly stated that not everyone is going to agree with my opinion. I'm not sure where you are getting the idea that I'm forcing mine on anyone when I said it was fine for you to disagree.


You should avoid expressions that make you sound how you are saying some facts.

Just because they aren't quite as exaggerated as some shows, does not mean that other characters like Kaede in Rascal Does Not Dream of Bunny Senpai don't fall in that category.


Again with these random comparisons with show that have an actual plain, common and generic moe art style, that doesn't fit TBHK.

It was part of the character design for a reason (cuteness). If you ask me, the vast majority of objects, settings, and background characters that aren't an infected monster to kill are drawn in a very cutesy style. And even when gothic themes are introduced a part of that still shines through. Excluding the two adult apparitions, the majority of the main cast look extremely young.


False, the majority of the main cast doesn't look extremely young, despite ALL of them are ACTUALLY very young, so it's not like they must look in their 20s.

Sure the exorcist has a somewhat older face, but his body is just like the male leads.


Are you serious? You are saying that Kou's body is like Hanako's body?

Despite both of them are very young (they are still middle school kids), Kou is way taller and also bulkier than Hanako.
You are simply in denial at this point.
Are you telling me that all these guys have the same body?


Maybe you didn't understand that Hanako is supposed to be a shorty for narrative reasons...he isn't Nene's type. Nene likes tall guys and the show/manga is full of them.
Hanako is a SHORTY and this is something that is repeated and showed all the time in the manga/anime.


He is the only one to be that short, so you can't say ALL the male characters are like him.

Really her two older crushes are the only ones who look like actual teenagers. The rest look like preteens at best, when they aren't completely chibi caricatures.


Absolutely false, how I showed you. Hanako (and his twin) are the only short guys.


This just seems like a show to introduce a lot of teenage girls to anime to me, interspersing darker bits to make it look more edgy and mature.


I am not a teenager, and I like this manga because it's well written. Simply this.


P.S. Let's not forget that in the OP 7th Wonder is being molested by his twin brother. Can't imagine why that would draw such people in lol


That scene isn't pure fanservice, since it's also a cover in a manga's chapter that suggests the possible abusive relationship between Hanako and his brother.

EDIT: I added more pics, so look at all of them, please. Thanks.

removed-userApr 28, 2020 2:09 AM
Apr 28, 2020 1:47 AM
Offline
Jul 2018
564612
Seriously, some people should stop to think that the only charm of this series is the cute art style.
In the first place, the art style isn't your typical "cute" same face thing that you find in moe anime/manga, and it's a fact. All the characters have different shapes of face and eyes that give them a peculiar look. You can't confuse the characters' face easily.
Plus, you can't base your idea of the general plot on the anime, since they SKIPPED the main plot twists that would have introduced way more mysteries.
The reason why I like reading this manga so much is indeed because of its main plot. I like to develop so many different theories about it.
I hate MOE shows, your typical formula "cute girls/boys doing cute things".
If you didn't read this manga, you can't know its main plot, obviously.
But it's okay for you dropping the anime or not being interested in the manga. There's plenty of anime/manga that aren't my cup of tea, and I don't feel the need to know them better.
But I think it's really stupid trying to say WHY other people enjoy something that I am not able to enjoy. It's their business, and you guys can't come here, without knowing the story, and say that the reason why some people like this is mainly because it's CUTE. Seriously, wth do you even know about a story that you didn't read?
removed-userApr 28, 2020 1:52 AM
Apr 28, 2020 2:05 AM
Offline
Jul 2018
564612
Finally, I can't believe I must show how a shoujo manga is supposed to look:

Bubbles everywhere, poor backgrounds, etc.
Also the system of panels is very typical and different from the ones that you see in shounen manga.
Usually, shoujo manga don't have the level of detail and system of panels that you find in TBHK:
Apr 28, 2020 2:39 AM
Offline
Mar 2016
207
momoka16 said:
Finally, I can't believe I must show how a shoujo manga is supposed to look:

Bubbles everywhere, poor backgrounds, etc.
Also the system of panels is very typical and different from the ones that you see in shounen manga.
Usually, shoujo manga don't have the level of detail and system of panels that you find in TBHK:


This whole time I've been talking about the anime lol. You can keep defending the manga if you want.

My point was that Kaede fits the Loli trope. Maybe you shouldn't jump to conclusions and take everything so personally. For example I never said or even alluded to you being a teenager, just that this is probably a gateway anime for a lot of them, same as Naruto was for little boys.

I did actually finish this anime, and I understood its story. I hate to break this to you, but most fan-service is not just for the sake of fan-service. Most of the time those types of things are worked into the plot/characters somehow. That doesn't get rid of the fact that it's something fans want to see.

Every character doesn't have to be into her for there to be reverse harem tropes. That's why I said there were merely traits of it. And there doesn't need to be love involved anyway.

I really don't know what you have against the idea of a piece of media having more than one genre, not fitting squarely into one, or borrowing from a few. I don't see how it's wrong to state that.

It's funny that you keep demanding things of me and others too. Ah to be young again.

Have you ever seen Princess Tutu? It's a much better version of this in my opinion. Plenty of gothic themes and a more intricate style as well. It's older, so a lot of people find it pretty dated, but it's a show that I really liked. If you like this, I suggest you give it a try. So yeah... That's one that contradicts you. Well have fun obsessing over labels.

This is the best screen cap I can find atm, since most are just character shots. But the further on you go, the more abstract stuff is thrown in.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/4a/07/8e/4a078e30271b25f1f08fa1d2d188ff6e.png

I forgot how refreshing it was to be talked down to through internet screeds. I mean I generally try to avoid doing that even when I disagree with people, but whatever floats your boat. You gave me a good chuckle thanks. Have a nice day.
DarkdaxterApr 28, 2020 3:06 AM
Apr 28, 2020 2:45 AM
Offline
Jul 2018
564612
I wanted to explain another thing.
TBHK is a SHOUNEN manga for the technical reasons that I explained (it is indeed published on a shounen magazine).
So, why do I think is has a huge appeal to the female audience? Simply because of some aspects that is shares also with other shounen manga that are very loved also by a female audience, like Inuyasha for example.
In the first place, the story is told from the point of view of the female lead, Nene. And her personality isn't the typical one that you see in shounen manga. She is what many male otaku would call a s*ut? Obviously I don't think this about the poor Nene, but many male readers dislike female characters when they are boy crazy types like Nene, and they aren't obsessively dedicated only to the main male character (that usually in shounen manga is the self-insert for your average male reader).
Nene isn't very charming for a male audience, and she is often considered very annoying. There are few female characters, and except for Nene, NOBODY of them is interested romantically in Hanako-kun (not even Nene is completely interested only in him, since she admits she likes him to some extent, but she continues to search for her perfect boy).
Hanako isn't a easy self-insert for the male audience, since he is a mysterious antihero who isn't relatable to them.
Indeed, I believe most of male readers prefer Kou, since he is the actual self-insert for them: he has the typical shounen male lead personality, with its strong sense of justice, friendship, and his being very shy and unable to confess his love to the girl who he likes (Nene).
As I already said, in this series there aren't many girls, and there's not any kind of harem for the male lead.
This doesn't mean this manga is a reverse harem: again, only two guys are interested in Nene (Kou blatantly, Hanako in a more complicated and ambiguous way).
This is simply one of those shounen manga written to appeal a wide audience (I'm not saying indeed it's impossible for some guy liking this story), with the probability to be liked more by a female audience. But there's plenty of shounen manga like this, for example Rumiko Takahashi has always been very good to write this kind of stories, see Inuyasha and Ranma 1//2, despite especially in Ranma 1/2, she used a lot of fanservice for the male audience.
Apr 28, 2020 2:47 AM
Offline
Jul 2018
564612
Darkdaxter said:
momoka16 said:
Finally, I can't believe I must show how a shoujo manga is supposed to look:

Bubbles everywhere, poor backgrounds, etc.
Also the system of panels is very typical and different from the ones that you see in shounen manga.
Usually, shoujo manga don't have the level of detail and system of panels that you find in TBHK:


Have you ever seen Princess Tutu? It's a much better version of this in my opinion. Plenty of gothic themes and a more intricate style as well. It's older, so a lot of people find it pretty dated, but it's a show that I really liked. If you like this, I suggest you give it a try. So yeah... That's one that contradicts you. Well have fun obsessing over labels.

This is the best screen cap I can find atm, since most are just character shots. But the further on you go, the more abstract stuff is thrown in.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/4a/07/8e/4a078e30271b25f1f08fa1d2d188ff6e.png


How can you say that Princess Tutu is better than TBHK if you didn't read it? Your attitude is hilarious.
Apr 28, 2020 2:55 AM
Offline
Jul 2018
564612
TBHK is a mix of Japanese folklore, religion, urban legends, and Western literature (there's actually a solid influence from The Phantom of the opera).
I'm really liking it, and I can't wait for the next chapter every month. It's not easy to me liking a manga so much these days.
Apr 28, 2020 3:22 AM
Offline
Jul 2018
564612
@Darkdaxter: sorry, but at this point is really absurd for you trying to tell me why I should like some other anime/manga better than this.
Unlike you, I know this story and I know why I am interested in it. It's because we have sudden plot twists like this one (DON'T READ if you could be a bit interested in this manga):



And this is ONLY one of the tons of mysteries about this manga that make it so unpredictable and exciting to me. Many things are NOT like they seem. I don't mean to make you interested in this manga, but I am tired of people like you that try to tell that the ones who love this manga find it nice just because the art style is cute. If you don't know the story, you can't know what many readers find interesting in it.
removed-userApr 28, 2020 3:55 AM
Apr 28, 2020 3:32 AM
Offline
Jul 2018
564612
Darkdaxter said:

I forgot how refreshing it was to be talked down to through internet screeds. I mean I generally try to avoid doing that even when I disagree with people, but whatever floats your boat. You gave me a good chuckle thanks. Have a nice day.


You could stop act all mighty and high for no reason at all. The fact that you consider Princess Tutu "old", tells me that you are actually a kid.
May 27, 2020 6:31 PM

Offline
Feb 2012
1109
I honestly believe this show to be overrated.
The art and theme was nice but the comedy and characters were weak.
The first few episodes were ok but it just got more boring the more i watched.
It's probably just not for me.


「 To other people, I might not have changed at all, but I feel like I was able to change... 」

Jan 16, 2022 4:46 PM

Offline
Aug 2019
183
Probably the 'Toilet' in the English title. At least that's what kept me from watching it for so long.



"...fatih, hope, and love. But the greatest of these is love."

"I began to trust the world [...] to give unforeseen goods and pleasures that I had not thought to want."

Jan 26, 2022 1:57 AM
Offline
May 2019
1056
Because the general audience have generic tastes but this is a 10/10 for me.
Pages (3) « 1 2 [3]

More topics from this board

Poll: » Jibaku Shounen Hanako-kun Episode 2 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )

Stark700 - Jan 16, 2020

124 by Inacio0101 »»
Apr 21, 8:21 AM

Poll: » Does the recently Aired spin off covered the missing parts of manga ? Or different story

chukesh007 - Jan 29

3 by emirw »»
Jan 30, 4:36 PM

» Can i get a song list

dicloflom - Dec 28, 2023

7 by dicloflom »»
Jan 12, 5:52 AM

Poll: » Jibaku Shounen Hanako-kun Episode 12 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )

Stark700 - Mar 26, 2020

139 by luviendsol »»
Dec 23, 2023 2:07 PM

Poll: » Jibaku Shounen Hanako-kun Episode 11 Discussion ( 1 2 )

Stark700 - Mar 19, 2020

54 by WELLERM »»
Dec 17, 2023 12:51 AM

Preview MangaManga Store

It’s time to ditch the text file.
Keep track of your anime easily by creating your own list.
Sign Up Login