| For example from Donald Duck to Angel Beats. What if they all exist becuase of our mind, our toughts. Even the smallest least know fiction from indie writers or startup comics. But in another universe/Dimension and or time.? Pherhaps even in our own? We can see here fictional tech is real from several movies to reality.  But what if characters and such exist!? |
| Near is far superior to you! |
| This has nothing to do with physics or philosophy... |
| I don't believe at all in parallel universes. That's just the thought of thinkers assimilating ideas like all we did in life... Take return in time. What is time then ? Time is only the movement at every second. Memory of yours are neurons that are still in your brain. Past is only brain connections, future is a concept. Most of the logical concept exists in potentiality of course, that is, some super phone will exist with the hype and demand there is for it, and such evolution is reserved for anything that take over the economic market, or whatever science can work upon... But parallel universe is a fiction. That is to say, parallel universes doesn't mean parallel galaxies, and it feels like it would be totally normal for another galaxy to have life in it. @NudeBear That too x) |
 |
| I think that's where the concept of the 'astral plane' comes in. Fiction and animation 'downloads' an image into our physical world. Anime does connect heaven and earth as through skillful animation and artwork we can tell the story of what is happening in higher spheres. |
| I CELEBRATE myself, And what I assume you shall assume, For every atom belonging to me as good belongs to you. |
| Because that's how humans manage to stay alive. If the human race were perfectly logical, they wouldn't last very long. |
| Be thankful for the wisdom granted to you. |
Lolsebca said: I don't believe at all in parallel universes. That's just the thought of thinkers assimilating ideas like all we did in life... Take return in time. What is time then ? Time is only the movement at every second. Memory of yours are neurons that are still in your brain. Past is only brain connections, future is a concept. Most of the logical concept exists in potentiality of course, that is, some super phone will exist with the hype and demand there is for it, and such evolution is reserved for anything that take over the economic market, or whatever science can work upon... But parallel universe is a fiction. That is to say, parallel universes doesn't mean parallel galaxies, and it feels like it would be totally normal for another galaxy to have life in it. @NudeBear That too x) Even tough physicists say they are working on the thieries among the string theory or the simulation theory you choose to ingore it and disbalieve these? As these both include the consept and or at least the possibility of other universes and or dimensions . Lets we not forget our ancsestors experiences with spiritual beings and tales we would not believe now. How would you explain that? They are all fake and all tell lies? There is nothing to it you say? |
| Near is far superior to you! |
Error_inscript said: Lolsebca said: I don't believe at all in parallel universes. That's just the thought of thinkers assimilating ideas like all we did in life... Take return in time. What is time then ? Time is only the movement at every second. Memory of yours are neurons that are still in your brain. Past is only brain connections, future is a concept. Most of the logical concept exists in potentiality of course, that is, some super phone will exist with the hype and demand there is for it, and such evolution is reserved for anything that take over the economic market, or whatever science can work upon... But parallel universe is a fiction. That is to say, parallel universes doesn't mean parallel galaxies, and it feels like it would be totally normal for another galaxy to have life in it. @NudeBear That too x) Even tough physicists say they are working on the thieries among the string theory or the simulation theory you choose to ingore it and disbalieve these? As these both include the consept and or at least the possibility of other universes and or dimensions . Lets we not forget our ancsestors experiences with spiritual beings and tales we would not believe now. How would you explain that? They are all fake and all tell lies? There is nothing to it you say? Like spirituality is naivety, what I understood from string theory was religious and inconsistent ? Like, Idk for state of particle with undetermined state before measure but I have the intuition it's normal, like the particle state is switched actual states at the same time almost and measure kinda updates it, as if it was electronically sensible and 'updated' if measured. I don't know simulation theory either but they're only theories and anyone can propose scientific theories, or even can create a fictional value that is unreal but working in principle : every fucking physic equation with created values. The concept of assimilation of ideas seems logical philosophically so... And a theory of science nowadays should combine quantic and classic physics, hence why it still isn't validated by the scientific community, and why some of the concepts of parallel universes may as well be sheer fiction. Knowing I believe universe to be unique and everything (matter and life, perhaps life itself is some physic concept or chemical element of stuff we don't know) so there is no room for fictional time space. And also, theory means work in progress, disbelief of scientific facts I don't, just they're still not proved right. Besides science may as well be completely biased and not in its optimal form. You overevaluate science. As a human craft. |
|
Lolsebca said: Error_inscript said: Even tough physicists say they are working on the thieries among the string theory or the simulation theory you choose to ingore it and disbalieve these? As these both include the consept and or at least the possibility of other universes and or dimensions . Lets we not forget our ancsestors experiences with spiritual beings and tales we would not believe now. How would you explain that? They are all fake and all tell lies? There is nothing to it you say? Like spirituality is naivety, what I understood from string theory was religious and inconsistent ? Like, Idk for state of particle with undetermined state before measure but I have the intuition it's normal, like the particle state is switched actual states at the same time almost and measure kinda updates it, as if it was electronically sensible and 'updated' if measured. I don't know simulation theory either but they're only theories and anyone can propose scientific theories, or even can create a fictional value that is unreal but working in principle : every fucking physic equation with created values. The concept of assimilation of ideas seems logical philosophically so... And a theory of science nowadays should combine quantic and classic physics, hence why it still isn't validated by the scientific community, and why some of the concepts of parallel universes may as well be sheer fiction. Knowing I believe universe to be unique and everything (matter and life, perhaps life itself is some physic concept or chemical element of stuff we don't know) so there is no room for fictional time space. And also, theory means work in progress, disbelief of scientific facts I don't, just they're still not proved right. Besides science may as well be completely biased and not in its optimal form. You overevaluate science. As a human craft. So you are saying you have no understanding of the subject yet claim it is not true. Also you are saying theories such as string theory are not within the scientific community and are not respected? Does Michio Kaku knwo about the string theory , what about Steven Hawking? You are also claiming science is baised. So testing and evaluating things based on non baised specifications is baised? |
| Near is far superior to you! |
| I'm pretty sure you wouldn't want the majority of fictional creations to exist. People are ducked up. |
| Would these fiction world be one that pop into existence the moment the author writes them? Or would the number of these supposed existing alternative universe/dimension be so vast that it is fundamentally impossible to write something that doesn't already exist? None of this makes sense, you're just making a bullshit scenario into a train of thought that you perceive to be insightful/deep. |
| I'm not a lolicon, you're just projecting your tendency to lewd 2D characters. If your favourite character is Tsutsukakushi Tsukiko, you are my soul mate. Been a long time since I've been here, I'll continue expressing myself freely and believe everyone should too. My MAL Interview |
BurningSpirit said: Would these fiction world be one that pop into existence the moment the author writes them? Or would the number of these supposed existing alternative universe/dimension be so vast that it is fundamentally impossible to write something that doesn't already exist? None of this makes sense, you're just making a bullshit scenario into a train of thought that you perceive to be insightful/deep. Just becuase it may not seem to make sense does not mean it is not real. After all it could not make sense but be real instead. |
| Near is far superior to you! |
| So what if I wrote, in this post, that the exact universe in which we all reside (and definitely not any alternative versions of us) will explode in 5 seconds? Are you prepared to die? |
 |
| There's no physics involved. The answer is "so what?" |
| Be thankful for the wisdom granted to you. |
| Technically, since the universe is infinite, everything could exist, and if it doesn't right now, it eventually will. |
| So you're saying there's a chance my waifu really exists? |
| "No, son, you may not have your body pillow at the dinner table!" |
CatSoul said: So you're saying there's a chance my waifu really exists? CatSoul said: So you're saying there's a chance my waifu really exists? And mine too! Isn't that awsome? ! Like we will get wedded together !! |
| Near is far superior to you! |
| I don't think so because this doesnt take into account concept fragments. Consider this; a person has an idea but only a few specifics pertaining to it such as characters and personalities. That doesn't account for the entire world that character is to live in and what happens if that character happens to exist in the same world as us according to that individual's imagination? To ponder the possibility of fiction existing tangibly in other dimensions, we'd have to ponder the possibility of deistic powers within ourselves and what that means for us as a race. tl;dr fiction can never be more than fiction because we are not demigods |
| Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
| Shit, then bewbs actually become over inflated water balloons. |
I'm a shitposter for fun |
More topics from this board
» Fill this thread with the most questionable statement or two you can think of!IAmOdie - Apr 20 |
33 |
by deg
»»
18 minutes ago |
|
» What do you think about online friendship?Mehwish_999 - Apr 21 |
44 |
by Smugdear
»»
39 minutes ago |
|
» Planning a Spain Tripredlockhigh - Apr 8 |
19 |
by redlockhigh
»»
1 hour ago |
|
» Are you a slow or fast typier on a computer???DesuMaiden - Apr 19 |
40 |
by Smugdear
»»
1 hour ago |
|
» 2023-2024 NBA Season Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )deg - Jun 18, 2023 |
670 |
by SynthwaveCrusade
»»
3 hours ago |