Ratohnhaketon said: Zelev said: You would get more out of life if you took me up on that lobotomy offer. It still stands."So what?" What do you mean so what? You were willingly not telling the whole truth. You skewed the information in order to benefit your argument. That is, by definition, opportunistic. If you can't see that, then you can shove your agenda up your ass. Also, fuck your joke. It's tasteless as hell. Really who the fuck cares who he supported? That has nothing to do with a decision he made out of his own volition. I even conceded that so you would shut the fuck up and stop dodging my main point with a game of semantics. Yeah and well fuck your (lack of a) sense of humor. Ever been to Portland? I can tell you first hand my time there was borderline bedlam. "Really who the fuck cares who he supported?" Apparently, you did. Because you went through all that trouble to "break the narrative" by building your own narrative. "I even conceded that so you would shut the fuck up and stop dodging my main point with a game of semantics." Your main point of twisting the truth? Or your inability to acknowledge you twisted the truth? You even SPECIFICALLY said he was a Bernie Sanders supporter, so why are you playing dumb now? And hell yes, you have contradicted yourself many times. No one gives a shit about your experience in Portland. |
 Three things cannot be long hidden.. ...the s u n, the m oo n, and the tr u th. |
Zelev said: Here is my first post in this thread:Ratohnhaketon said: You would get more out of life if you took me up on that lobotomy offer. It still stands. Really who the fuck cares who he supported? That has nothing to do with a decision he made out of his own volition. I even conceded that so you would shut the fuck up and stop dodging my main point with a game of semantics. Yeah and well fuck your (lack of a) sense of humor. Ever been to Portland? I can tell you first hand my time there was borderline bedlam. "Really who the fuck cares who he supported?" Apparently, you did. Because you went through all that trouble to "break the narrative" by building your own narrative. "I even conceded that so you would shut the fuck up and stop dodging my main point with a game of semantics." Your main point of twisting the truth? Or your inability to acknowledge you twisted the truth? You even SPECIFICALLY said he was a Bernie Sanders supporter, so why are you playing dumb now? And hell yes, you have contradicted yourself many times. No one gives a shit about your experience in Portland. There's a fundamental difference between blaming an ideology and blaming an individual. To blame an ideology, one needs to look at its teachings and the behavior of those who follow it. To blame an individual, you need definitive proof of their direct involvement. A more accurate comparison would be to blame Nouman Ali Khan for the Manchester Bombing. Which is an entirely silly accusation as well. You interpreted it as me blaming Bernie. You were wrong. Stop being so clingy and zany. Yeah well you care enough to cry rivers about it. I was just poking fun and then you took a stab at me. |
 |
Ratohnhaketon said: Zelev said: Here is my first post in this thread:"Really who the fuck cares who he supported?" Apparently, you did. Because you went through all that trouble to "break the narrative" by building your own narrative. "I even conceded that so you would shut the fuck up and stop dodging my main point with a game of semantics." Your main point of twisting the truth? Or your inability to acknowledge you twisted the truth? You even SPECIFICALLY said he was a Bernie Sanders supporter, so why are you playing dumb now? And hell yes, you have contradicted yourself many times. No one gives a shit about your experience in Portland. There's a fundamental difference between blaming an ideology and blaming an individual. To blame an ideology, one needs to look at its teachings and the behavior of those who follow it. To blame an individual, you need definitive proof of their direct involvement. A more accurate comparison would be to blame Nouman Ali Khan for the Manchester Bombing. Which is an entirely silly accusation as well. You interpreted it as me blaming Bernie. You were wrong. Stop being so clingy and zany. Yeah well you care enough to cry rivers about it. I was just poking fun and then you took a stab at me. Lol, the fuck? I don't care about Bernie. In my opinion, the guy is a fucking sellout. Anyway, my point was that you basically said, "Yeah, I spread misinformation, but so what?" |
Three things cannot be long hidden.. ...the s u n, the m oo n, and the tr u th. |
omfgplzstop said: Zelev said: He remains a Bernie Sanders supporter. If anyone is twisting the truth, it's you. He doesn't care who he supported, he cares to explain to people that blaming Trump for this is stupid. You're needlessly hostile. Calm down and think."Really who the fuck cares who he supported?" Apparently, you did. Because you went through all that trouble to "break the narrative" by building your own narrative. "I even conceded that so you would shut the fuck up and stop dodging my main point with a game of semantics." Your main point of twisting the truth? Or your inability to acknowledge you twisted the truth? You even SPECIFICALLY said he was a Bernie Sanders supporter, so why are you playing dumb now? And hell yes, you have contradicted yourself many times. No one gives a shit about your experience in Portland. Bruh, if he remained a Bernie supporter then why does he share Libertarian posts and attended right-wing marches? Obviously, it's not that simple. And to continue to post screenshots of him being a Bernie supporter but not screenshots of the other two things I listed above.. that's spreading misinformation - or not telling the whole truth. |
Three things cannot be long hidden.. ...the s u n, the m oo n, and the tr u th. |
Zelev said: What does your opinion of Bernie have anything to do with what I just said? I don't recall asking for something so irrelevant.Lol, the fuck? I don't care about Bernie. In my opinion, the guy is a fucking sellout. Anyway, my point was that you basically said, "Yeah, I spread misinformation, but so what?" Since it's beyond your mental capacity, I showed you that post because me noting that he was a Bernie supporter (which is becoming more evident that he was, but I don't want to deflect to semantic bullshit like you do) does not mean I blamed Bernie or suggested that he had any responsibility for the actions of a deranged loser. Nor was I castigating Bernie supporters as a certain stereotype of violent, zany thugs. It was simply to emphasize how not only does blaming Trump have no rationale because you can't scapegoat your decisions onto someone else, but that this particular chump isn't even a Trump enthusiast to begin with. Your examples of "right-wing marches" and "white supremacy" are just non-sequiturs to tie it to Trump, which were debunked during the election. I'm too bored to debunk them thousands of more times. |
|
Zelev said: You do know that somebody can support a candidate and not agree 100% with what they say, right? I consistently vote for Canada's largest socialist party and yet I support many thing that Libertarians and Conservatives push and disagree with many things Socialists and Progressives push. Hell, I think Bernie would have been a better president than Trump but I still think Trump is better than Hilary, and I'd gladly march in a free speech rally along side my ideological opposites. Gasp, am I a right-winger because I didn't tow the party line?omfgplzstop said: He remains a Bernie Sanders supporter. If anyone is twisting the truth, it's you. He doesn't care who he supported, he cares to explain to people that blaming Trump for this is stupid. You're needlessly hostile. Calm down and think. Bruh, if he remained a Bernie supporter then why does he share Libertarian posts and attended right-wing marches? Obviously, it's not that simple. And to continue to post screenshots of him being a Bernie supporter but not screenshots of the other two things I listed above.. that's spreading misinformation - or not telling the whole truth. Trying to throw responsibility at a group of people you don't like for something some insane person did, despite evidence that he was, infact, a supporter of the opposite, is intellectually dishonest. You can be a Sandersbro and still support free speech. You can be a Trumpite and still support social justice issues. Not everything is clear cut and you trying to place people in ideological boxes is really stupid. |
 I love Christine "If one advances confidently in the direction of his dreams, and endeavors to live the life which he has imagined, he will meet with a success unexpected in common hours. He will put some things behind, will pass an invisible boundary; In proportion as he simplifies his life, the laws of the universe will appear less complex, and solitude will not be solitude, nor poverty poverty, nor weakness weakness." - Henry David Thoreau |
Ratohnhaketon said: Zelev said: What does your opinion of Bernie have anything to do with what I just said? I don't recall asking for something so irrelevant.Lol, the fuck? I don't care about Bernie. In my opinion, the guy is a fucking sellout. Anyway, my point was that you basically said, "Yeah, I spread misinformation, but so what?" Since it's beyond your mental capacity, I showed you that post because me noting that he was a Bernie supporter (which is becoming more evident that he was, but I don't want to deflect to semantic bullshit like you do) does not mean I blamed Bernie or suggested that he had any responsibility for the actions of a deranged loser. Nor was I castigating Bernie supporters as a certain stereotype of violent, zany thugs. It was simply to emphasize how not only does blaming Trump have no rationale because you can't scapegoat your decisions onto someone else, but that this particular chump isn't even a Trump enthusiast to begin with. Your examples of "right-wing marches" and "white supremacy" are just non-sequiturs to tie it to Trump, which were debunked during the election. I'm too bored to debunk them thousands of more times. Because you claimed I thought you were blaming Bernie, when in reality, I don't give a shit if you blame Bernie or Trump, etc. What I do care about is the spreading of misinformation. To say he isn't a Trump enthusiast is accurate, but that doesn't mean he would never support him. Those are two different things. By the way, I'm not trying to tie it to Trump. I'm trying to show you he has ties to the right as well as the left, judging from his fb posts. It's common sense, so I don't really see what you don't get here at this point. Just a side note but you seem to have this great desire to defend Trump at all costs. As if his rhetoric isn't partly to blame for the rise in hate speech. And what exactly are you referring to when you say "... debunked during the election." What was? |
Three things cannot be long hidden.. ...the s u n, the m oo n, and the tr u th. |
ThrashMatto said: Zelev said: You do know that somebody can support a candidate and not agree 100% with what they say, right? I consistently vote for Canada's largest socialist party and yet I support many thing that Libertarians and Conservatives push and disagree with many things Socialists and Progressives push. Hell, I think Bernie would have been a better president than Trump but I still think Trump is better than Hilary, and I'd gladly march in a free speech rally along side my ideological opposites. Gasp, am I a right-winger because I didn't tow the party line?Bruh, if he remained a Bernie supporter then why does he share Libertarian posts and attended right-wing marches? Obviously, it's not that simple. And to continue to post screenshots of him being a Bernie supporter but not screenshots of the other two things I listed above.. that's spreading misinformation - or not telling the whole truth. Trying to throw responsibility at a group of people you don't like for something some insane person did, despite evidence that he was, infact, a supporter of the opposite, is intellectually dishonest. You can be a Sandersbro and still support free speech. You can be a Trumpite and still support social justice issues. Not everything is clear cut and you trying to place people in ideological boxes is really stupid. Except that's exactly what I'm not doing. I'm not putting Jeremy Christian in a box like these other people who only post about his Bernie posts but not his Libertarian ones and right-wing marches posts. I understand your point, so I assume you just replied to the wrong person. |
Three things cannot be long hidden.. ...the s u n, the m oo n, and the tr u th. |
Zelev said: "Hate speech" doesn't actually mean anything. God dammit, I knew it was a waste of time responding to you. Well done.Ratohnhaketon said: What does your opinion of Bernie have anything to do with what I just said? I don't recall asking for something so irrelevant. Since it's beyond your mental capacity, I showed you that post because me noting that he was a Bernie supporter (which is becoming more evident that he was, but I don't want to deflect to semantic bullshit like you do) does not mean I blamed Bernie or suggested that he had any responsibility for the actions of a deranged loser. Nor was I castigating Bernie supporters as a certain stereotype of violent, zany thugs. It was simply to emphasize how not only does blaming Trump have no rationale because you can't scapegoat your decisions onto someone else, but that this particular chump isn't even a Trump enthusiast to begin with. Your examples of "right-wing marches" and "white supremacy" are just non-sequiturs to tie it to Trump, which were debunked during the election. I'm too bored to debunk them thousands of more times. Because you claimed I thought you were blaming Bernie, when in reality, I don't give a shit if you blame Bernie or Trump, etc. What I do care about is the spreading of misinformation. To say he isn't a Trump enthusiast is accurate, but that doesn't mean he would never support him. Those are two different things. By the way, I'm not trying to tie it to Trump. I'm trying to show you he has ties to the right as well as the left, judging from his fb posts. It's common sense, so I don't really see what you don't get here at this point. Just a side note but you seem to have this great desire to defend Trump at all costs. As if his rhetoric isn't partly to blame for the rise in hate speech. And what exactly are you referring to when you say "... debunked during the election." What was? |
|
| F*cking Islamophobia. It's sensible to disagree with the ideology of ISIS, or even the ideology of Islam itself. It crosses the line when it comes to spreading hate towards innocent people. The guys who stepped up did the right thing, so it's shameful that it ended so badly. I'm wishing for the best for their families and friends. |
 "ᴀɴᴅ ᴛʜᴏsᴇ ᴡʜᴏ ᴡᴇʀᴇ sᴇᴇɴ ᴅᴀɴᴄɪɴɢ ᴡᴇʀᴇ ᴛʜᴏᴜɢʜᴛ ᴛᴏ ʙᴇ ɪɴsᴀɴᴇ ʙʏ ᴛʜᴏsᴇ ᴡʜᴏ ᴄᴏᴜʟᴅ ɴᴏᴛ ʜᴇᴀʀ ᴛʜᴇ ᴍᴜsɪᴄ."  |
Ratohnhaketon said: Zelev said: "Hate speech" doesn't actually mean anything. God dammit, I knew it was a waste of time responding to you. Well done.Because you claimed I thought you were blaming Bernie, when in reality, I don't give a shit if you blame Bernie or Trump, etc. What I do care about is the spreading of misinformation. To say he isn't a Trump enthusiast is accurate, but that doesn't mean he would never support him. Those are two different things. By the way, I'm not trying to tie it to Trump. I'm trying to show you he has ties to the right as well as the left, judging from his fb posts. It's common sense, so I don't really see what you don't get here at this point. Just a side note but you seem to have this great desire to defend Trump at all costs. As if his rhetoric isn't partly to blame for the rise in hate speech. And what exactly are you referring to when you say "... debunked during the election." What was? Hate speech doesn't mean anything to you, maybe? But it has an actual definition. Try again, moron. |
Three things cannot be long hidden.. ...the s u n, the m oo n, and the tr u th. |
Zelev said: "Hate speech" is just something autistic banshees like to screech when they have nothing meaningful to contribute.Ratohnhaketon said: "Hate speech" doesn't actually mean anything. God dammit, I knew it was a waste of time responding to you. Well done. Hate speech doesn't mean anything to you, maybe? But it has an actual definition. Try again, moron. Oh and hate speech is free speech, cry another fucking river. |
|
Ratohnhaketon said: Zelev said: "Hate speech" is just something autistic banshees like to screech when they have nothing meaningful to contribute.Hate speech doesn't mean anything to you, maybe? But it has an actual definition. Try again, moron. Oh and hate speech is free speech, cry another fucking river. But you just said hate speech doesn't mean anything? Now you're saying hate speech is free speech. I like how you contradict yourself without even knowing it. "autistic" So then you are a conservative that wants to protect his loser President? You're so edgy. I bet all you do is shitpost. |
Three things cannot be long hidden.. ...the s u n, the m oo n, and the tr u th. |
Zelev said: You remind me of those socially awkward techies who try to break down language into code and decipher figures of speech into literal logical sequences.Ratohnhaketon said: "Hate speech" is just something autistic banshees like to screech when they have nothing meaningful to contribute. Oh and hate speech is free speech, cry another fucking river. But you just said hate speech doesn't mean anything? Now you're saying hate speech is free speech. I like how you contradict yourself without even knowing it. "autistic" So then you are a conservative that wants to protect his loser President? You're so edgy. I bet all you do is shitpost. Yes, I mentioned "hate speech" in a very dismissive and flippant way. Maybe I'll add the quotations every time so you don't pleasure yourself into thinking you caught onto some secret fallacy that exposes my cuckservative nuances. My president won, unlike loser Crooked Hillary, Brainless Bernie, and the other 17 cuckservatives who disgraced their GOP. And if you're an American, he's your president too. My political leanings are irrelevant. I don't want to disgrace you further, you should stop here. Edit: Sorry, let me help you. My (((cuckservative))) nuances. |
ZekkenshinMay 29, 2017 12:48 AM
|
| RIP to the two heroes who stand up against racism. |
But it's important to remember that a movie review is subjective;it only gives you one person's opinion. http://www.classzone.com/books/lnetwork_gr08/page_build.cfm?content=analyz_media&ch=30 It doesn't matter if you like LoGH,Monster etc.If you are a jobless or college/school dropout living in your mom basement, you are still an unintelligent loser. Taste in anime does not make you a better person.If elitist don't exist, casual pleb and shit taste also don't exist. |
DateYutaka said: Uhhh.....nope. The delusions that Trump somehow hates Muslims empower people to live in Lalaland, but nope.Ratohnhaketon said: There's a fundamental difference between blaming an ideology and blaming an individual. To blame an ideology, one needs to look at its teachings and the behavior of those who follow it. To blame an individual, you need definitive proof of their direct involvement. A more accurate comparison would be to blame Nouman Ali Khan for the Manchester Bombing. Which is an entirely silly accusation as well. Unless you want to treat Trump as an ideology, which might not be that far off for some at this point. Trump demogure has impawerd this hugely |
|
omfgplzstop said: How many people here know Islamophobia was coined by a front group of the Muslim Brotherhood? CIA report, not conspiracies. Dundundun. Replace it with anti-muslimism or muslimophobia, please. There are plenty of things genuinely scary about Islam. Zelev said: Oh, you're that special kind of stupid.But you just said hate speech doesn't mean anything? Now you're saying hate speech is free speech. I like how you contradict yourself without even knowing it. "autistic" So then you are a conservative that wants to protect his loser President? You're so edgy. I bet all you do is shitpost. Lmao, it's funny considering he/she admitted to it. But please, go on about how you're superior. |
Three things cannot be long hidden.. ...the s u n, the m oo n, and the tr u th. |
DateYutaka said: Not all racists are right wing, nor is there any proof of the claim that all racists backed Trump. Will Quigg, a grand dragon within the KKK, openly endorsed Hillary and said "For the KKK, Clinton is our choice."Ratohnhaketon said: Uhhh.....nope. The delusions that Trump somehow hates Muslims empower people to live in Lalaland, but nope. base on some people who back him not all trump voters were racist but all racists did vote trump idont think many far righttst voted Clition if any Even for the ones that did back Trump, he made his message more than clear over a year ago: |
|
Ratohnhaketon said: Zelev said: You remind me of those socially awkward techies who try to break down language into code and decipher figures of speech into literal logical sequences.But you just said hate speech doesn't mean anything? Now you're saying hate speech is free speech. I like how you contradict yourself without even knowing it. "autistic" So then you are a conservative that wants to protect his loser President? You're so edgy. I bet all you do is shitpost. Yes, I mentioned "hate speech" in a very dismissive and flippant way. Maybe I'll add the quotations every time so you don't pleasure yourself into thinking you caught onto some secret fallacy that exposes my cuckservative nuances. My president won, unlike loser Crooked Hillary, Brainless Bernie, and the other 17 cuckservatives who disgraced their GOP. And if you're an American, he's your president too. My political leanings are irrelevant. I don't want to disgrace you further, you should stop here. Edit: Sorry, let me help you. My (((cuckservative))) nuances. So then, "hate speech is free speech" = figure of speech? LMAO, where is the logic in that, exactly? You can stop grasping at straws, you basically have nothing to stand on at this point. You just keep talking in circles about how you "won" all while contradicting yourself (which is pretty typical of your kind). Who cares if your President won? His approval rating is garbage, he has been caught in numerous lies, he has conflicts of interest, he wants tax breaks for the rich, he's privatizing education, claims he will make healthcare "better," but he won, right? Good for you, I guess? But is that really all you can say? That's literally your only accomplishment. He won (even though he got shit on by popular vote). Now get him to actually do something. I find it hilarious how you think you've "disgraced" me when your argument is literally just defending Trump without a care for the truth. Your stance is childish at best. Please, disgrace me more senpai. I need a good whipping. |
Three things cannot be long hidden.. ...the s u n, the m oo n, and the tr u th. |
Zelev said: Well for one, I'm not even conservative. I lean more towards classical liberalism with pinches of libertarianism. There goes your shitty narrative, mr "edgelord." I use alt-right speak to trap gullible stooges.Ratohnhaketon said: You remind me of those socially awkward techies who try to break down language into code and decipher figures of speech into literal logical sequences. Yes, I mentioned "hate speech" in a very dismissive and flippant way. Maybe I'll add the quotations every time so you don't pleasure yourself into thinking you caught onto some secret fallacy that exposes my cuckservative nuances. My president won, unlike loser Crooked Hillary, Brainless Bernie, and the other 17 cuckservatives who disgraced their GOP. And if you're an American, he's your president too. My political leanings are irrelevant. I don't want to disgrace you further, you should stop here. Edit: Sorry, let me help you. My (((cuckservative))) nuances. So then, "hate speech is free speech" = figure of speech? LMAO, where is the logic in that, exactly? You can stop grasping at straws, you basically have nothing to stand on at this point. You just keep talking in circles about how you "won" all while contradicting yourself (which is pretty typical of your kind). Who cares if your President won? His approval rating is garbage, he has been caught in numerous lies, he has conflicts of interest, he wants tax breaks for the rich, he's privatizing education, claims he will make healthcare "better," but he won, right? Good for you, I guess? But is that really all you can say? That's literally your only accomplishment. He won (even though he got shit on by popular vote). Now get him to actually do something. I find it hilarious how you think you've "disgraced" me when your argument is literally just defending Trump without a care for the truth. Your stance is childish at best. Please, disgrace me more senpai. I need a good whipping. Second, I love to see people like you foam at the mouth at the idea of Trump being president. Just knowing that you're going to be bearing that cross for 4 years is delightful. That was a figure of speech, by the way. Don't start writing paragraphs about how you're not wearing a cross, ergo you somehow outsmarted me. Prove for once in your life that you have some degree of literacy. Lastly, I'll let you keep chewing on the "hate speech" bone that you dug up. Good little bitches deserve their rewards. Sometimes when I see a starving dog barking at me even though I just fed it, I throw another scrap and watch it charge all possessed like. |
|
Ratohnhaketon said: Zelev said: Well for one, I'm not even conservative. I lean more towards classical liberalism with pinches of libertarianism. There goes your shitty narrative, mr "edgelord." I use alt-right speak to trap gullible stooges.So then, "hate speech is free speech" = figure of speech? LMAO, where is the logic in that, exactly? You can stop grasping at straws, you basically have nothing to stand on at this point. You just keep talking in circles about how you "won" all while contradicting yourself (which is pretty typical of your kind). Who cares if your President won? His approval rating is garbage, he has been caught in numerous lies, he has conflicts of interest, he wants tax breaks for the rich, he's privatizing education, claims he will make healthcare "better," but he won, right? Good for you, I guess? But is that really all you can say? That's literally your only accomplishment. He won (even though he got shit on by popular vote). Now get him to actually do something. I find it hilarious how you think you've "disgraced" me when your argument is literally just defending Trump without a care for the truth. Your stance is childish at best. Please, disgrace me more senpai. I need a good whipping. Second, I love to see people like you foam at the mouth at the idea of Trump being president. Just knowing that you're going to be bearing that cross for 4 years is delightful. That was a figure of speech, by the way. Don't start writing paragraphs about how you're not wearing a cross, ergo you somehow outsmarted me. Prove for once in your life that you have some degree of literacy. Lastly, I'll let you keep chewing on the "hate speech" bone that you dug up. Good little bitches deserve their rewards. Sometimes when I see a starving dog barking at me even though I just fed it, I throw another scrap and watch it charge all possessed like. Is that really the best you have? You need to whip me, but so far you're just feeding your ego. I have to say, I'm a bit disappointed. Guess I'll go shove that cross up my ass, then. Edit: Trapped me for what, exactly? It doesn't matter if you're a liberal with "pinches of bullshit." You don't care for the truth, which makes you no better than CNN or FOX. |
Three things cannot be long hidden.. ...the s u n, the m oo n, and the tr u th. |
Zelev said: No coherent, intelligent response. Not that I was expecting one 50+ posts later.Ratohnhaketon said: Well for one, I'm not even conservative. I lean more towards classical liberalism with pinches of libertarianism. There goes your shitty narrative, mr "edgelord." I use alt-right speak to trap gullible stooges. Second, I love to see people like you foam at the mouth at the idea of Trump being president. Just knowing that you're going to be bearing that cross for 4 years is delightful. That was a figure of speech, by the way. Don't start writing paragraphs about how you're not wearing a cross, ergo you somehow outsmarted me. Prove for once in your life that you have some degree of literacy. Lastly, I'll let you keep chewing on the "hate speech" bone that you dug up. Good little bitches deserve their rewards. Sometimes when I see a starving dog barking at me even though I just fed it, I throw another scrap and watch it charge all possessed like. Is that really the best you have? You need to whip me, but so far you're just feeding your ego. I have to say, I'm a bit disappointed. Guess I'll go shove that cross up my ass, then. |
|
Ratohnhaketon said: Zelev said: No coherent, intelligent response. Not that I was expecting one 50+ posts later.Is that really the best you have? You need to whip me, but so far you're just feeding your ego. I have to say, I'm a bit disappointed. Guess I'll go shove that cross up my ass, then. Hmm? "I haven't contradicted myself..." - Ratohnhakteon 1) "He was a Bernie Sanders supporter." - "I concede that he was a Bernie supporter." 2) "Hate speech means nothings." - "Hate speech is free speech." - "When I said hate speech was free speech, I meant that as a figure of speech." 3) "I'm a liberal." - "I use alt-right speech." (Yeah, if you say so) 4) "You're trying to tie it to Trump." - "He was a Bernie Sanders supporter." 5) "I knew it was a waste of time arguing with you." ...50 replies later. Derp. |
Three things cannot be long hidden.. ...the s u n, the m oo n, and the tr u th. |
| The shrieking banshee doth protest too much, methinks. |
|
| Makes me want to go on an anti-Muslim rant. The killings were probably self defense. |
| "My only agenda is to eviscerate any who might try to rule over and control me"- Sousuke Aizen "Maybe, just maybe, there is no purpose in life... but if you linger a while longer in this world, you might discover something of value in it"- Orochimaru "All men are not created equal... both in birth and in upbringing, in sheer scope of ability, every human is inherently different"- Charles zi Britannia We are the Contra Mundi. We serve the great inimical Goddess who in her own time will destroy the world. Tremble, reprobates, in fear of her pitiless gaze. |
Zapredon said: Is there any indication that the man was racist?RIP to the two heroes who stand up against racism. |
| "My only agenda is to eviscerate any who might try to rule over and control me"- Sousuke Aizen "Maybe, just maybe, there is no purpose in life... but if you linger a while longer in this world, you might discover something of value in it"- Orochimaru "All men are not created equal... both in birth and in upbringing, in sheer scope of ability, every human is inherently different"- Charles zi Britannia We are the Contra Mundi. We serve the great inimical Goddess who in her own time will destroy the world. Tremble, reprobates, in fear of her pitiless gaze. |
More topics from this board
Sticky: » The Current Events Board Will Be Closed on Friday JST ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Luna - Aug 2, 2021 |
272 |
by traed
»»
Aug 5, 2021 5:56 PM |
|
» Third shot of Sinovac COVID-19 vaccine offers big increase in antibody levels: study ( 1 2 )Desolated - Jul 30, 2021 |
50 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:24 PM |
|
» Western vaccine producers engage in shameless profiteering while poorer countries are supplied mainly by China.Desolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
1 |
by Bourmegar
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:23 PM |
|
» NLRB officer says Amazon violated US labor lawDesolated - Aug 3, 2021 |
17 |
by kitsune0
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:41 PM |
|
» China Backs Cuba in Saying US Should Apply Sanctions To ItselfDesolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
10 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:36 PM |