| I live in an Oligarchy posing as a Republic. A democracy doesn't sound like too good of an idea either since it requires a population truly interested in politics instead of allowing biased people to do the thinking for them. |
 |
| A monarchy where I rule HHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAAA |
 |
| The system we have now is reasonable. It is not so much the system, than the shitheads that are in it. My preference is wherever (proper) Christians are in power and control. When atheists are in control you get Communism / hell. When Muslims are in control you get Islam / Sharia / hell. When Tribes are in control you get Famine and dystopia / hell. When Nationalist socialists get in control you end up with Progressive dystopia / genocide / hell. When Monarchs are in control you get good monarchs and evil monarchs / mixed bag. There probably has never been an actual democracy ever. |
| idk about you but the closer a girl gets to looking like ronald mcdonald, the more aroused i become. CAV where can we cast our eyes to @PoruMairu who thinks of himself a member of the true church. Helion. |
| What kind of Christian is a proper Christian, just curious. |
|
Pirating_Ninja said: What kind of Christian is a proper Christian, just curious. Not the Neo-Cuckservatives in USA. Not Anglicans with their paganism. Orthodox Christians and our Roman Catholic Brothers who have kept the faith. |
| idk about you but the closer a girl gets to looking like ronald mcdonald, the more aroused i become. CAV where can we cast our eyes to @PoruMairu who thinks of himself a member of the true church. Helion. |
Pirating_Ninja said: I live in an Oligarchy posing as a Republic. A democracy doesn't sound like too good of an idea either since it requires a population truly interested in politics instead of allowing biased people to do the thinking for them. I think that applies to any government type. An educated/principled population wouldn't let an Oligarchy, for example, get away with fraud. The politics are so divided in the US though so I don't see that happening. |
| Signature is too edgy for me. |
Goofs said: PoruMairu said: so what would you think of Christian fascists? there's been a few movements back when fascism was big, like the Romanians trying to establish a society for Christians only and create a law system based strictly on the BibleThe system we have now is reasonable. It is not so much the system, than the shitheads that are in it. My preference is wherever (proper) Christians are in power and control. When atheists are in control you get Communism / hell. When Muslims are in control you get Islam / Sharia / hell. When Tribes are in control you get Famine and dystopia / hell. When Nationalist socialists get in control you end up with Progressive dystopia / genocide / hell. When Monarchs are in control you get good monarchs and evil monarchs / mixed bag. There probably has never been an actual democracy ever. Again, I am not so much as wanting a particular "system" over another. I think that whatever "system" is in place, if Christians are empowered, they will not be too overbearing and greedy etc.... As for actual Christofascism - that is against christianity itself, and a horrible depiction of Christ's own action here on earth. |
| idk about you but the closer a girl gets to looking like ronald mcdonald, the more aroused i become. CAV where can we cast our eyes to @PoruMairu who thinks of himself a member of the true church. Helion. |
| I'd live in China desu Bitches can't appreciate my 和谐社会 |
| I'd like to live in a Democracy where the majority of people are actually smart enough, or at least, informed enough to vote for the right representatives. Which never happens Or in a Monarchy with a decent king/queen with enough will and power to move the country forward. "All it takes" is the right person with the right ideas. |
| Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
| Well, only one working system existed. Let's take it back. |
 |
PoruMairu said: The system we have now is reasonable. It is not so much the system, than the shitheads that are in it. My preference is wherever (proper) Christians are in power and control. When atheists are in control you get Communism / hell. There probably has never been an actual democracy ever. Didn't know I liked communism more. Thanks for telling me. |
 |
| I'm pretty sure all political systems suck, if the people running them suck. You can make pretty much anything work as long as the people are willing to support it, and the person in charge is benevolant. Good luck finding that, these days. I guess to answer your question, I would, as long as it benefited me, and the leadership wasn't overtly corrupt. |
| A Benevolent dictatorship like Yugoslavia was under Josip Broz Tito. Maybe an Enlightened absolutism or Enlightened depotism. Scientocracy and a constitution is good to have along with these systems. |
| I live in an oligarchy, not in a democracy. I would live in the government I rule, of course since I can't be worse than others at it anyway, plus I'm a good girl ;) |
 |
PoruMairu said: uh how old are you? The system is shit. Both parties are shit.The system we have now is reasonable. It is not so much the system, than the shitheads that are in it. My preference is wherever (proper) Christians are in power and control. When atheists are in control you get Communism / hell. When Muslims are in control you get Islam / Sharia / hell. When Tribes are in control you get Famine and dystopia / hell. When Nationalist socialists get in control you end up with Progressive dystopia / genocide / hell. When Monarchs are in control you get good monarchs and evil monarchs / mixed bag. There probably has never been an actual democracy ever. You want religious nuts in control? Someone who is not religious should be in control so they don't have bullshit fairy tales to influence them. |
 |
| They're shit as long as people are shit What we need are aliens |
| "I like young-girl sexual creations, Lolicon is just one hobby of my many hobbies," he says. I ask what his wife, standing nearby, thinks of his "hobby". "She probably thinks no problem," he replies. "Because she loves young boys sexually interacting with each other." |
Posadism is what you're looking for http://www.vice.com/read/posadism-trotskyism-guillermo-almeyra-interview-876 |
traed said: Posadism is what you're looking for http://www.vice.com/read/posadism-trotskyism-guillermo-almeyra-interview-876 "According to this theory, it is only under socialist conditions that the technology for interplanetary travel can be developed. So the emergence of signs of alien life is connected to the existence of socialism on a different planet. The aliens will plan the revolution on Earth based on their experiences of communism in their planet." Made me lol irl At least they're not committing mass suicide like Heaven's Gate |
| "I like young-girl sexual creations, Lolicon is just one hobby of my many hobbies," he says. I ask what his wife, standing nearby, thinks of his "hobby". "She probably thinks no problem," he replies. "Because she loves young boys sexually interacting with each other." |
| A rather loose democracy is probably the best way to describe my ideal government, but then again that's a rough description as it is. I want to be able to have my voice heard but I don't want the threat of losing my rights and privacy as a citizen. Hard thing to balance but if were talking ideological here than there ya go. |
 |
PoruMairu said: The system we have now is reasonable. It is not so much the system, than the shitheads that are in it. My preference is wherever (proper) Christians are in power and control. When Nationalist socialists get in control you end up with Progressive dystopia / genocide / hell. Excuse me? What the bloody hell is this shit? :DD Distopia, hell? :D Are you jew or what? |
|
PoruMairu said: The system we have now is reasonable. It is not so much the system, than the shitheads that are in it. My preference is wherever (proper) Christians are in power and control. When atheists are in control you get Communism / hell. When Muslims are in control you get Islam / Sharia / hell. When Tribes are in control you get Famine and dystopia / hell. When Nationalist socialists get in control you end up with Progressive dystopia / genocide / hell. When Monarchs are in control you get good monarchs and evil monarchs / mixed bag. There probably has never been an actual democracy ever. It is a relief that your fantasies would not come into fruition. The best you can hope for is a Christian president who shares your, er, "proper" Christian values and qualities. Perhaps then they might hope to affect changes that would align with your suiting. Let us thank the balance of democracy for not allowing the fantasies and biases of one such as yourself to take control. I'm genuinely grateful for this. razor39999 said: traed said: Cool, I didn't even have to be the one to bring it up, but yeah benevolent dictatorships are the best possible system, and usually the one when a certain culture achieves its "golden age". Tito is also one of my favorite recent history leaders and I'm proud to be living in his home country, although not at all proud with our current leaders. If you want to go further back into history, Cyrus the Great is probably THE role model for how a benevolent dictator should rule.A Benevolent dictatorship like Yugoslavia was under Josip Broz Tito. Maybe an Enlightened absolutism or Enlightened depotism. Scientocracy and a constitution is good to have along with these systems. Any form of dictatorship is undesirable in the face of democracy. With dictatorships there is no sure-fire way to perpetuate these qualities of benevolence in their leaders. With dictatorships, control ultimately rests in the hands of one individual (or one group of individuals), and the quality of governance is always dependent on their personal qualities. It is irrational to think of such systems as morally preferable to democracy. And their unreliability is only a case for labeling it as political regression. Be thankful for your democracy if you live in one. |
I have amused myself As we all do, we poets--writing vows To Chloris, Phyllis--any pretty name-- You might have had a pocketful of them! Take it, and turn to facts my fantasies-- I loosed these loves like doves into the air; Give them a habitation and a home. Here, take it-- You will find me all the more Eloquent, being insincere! Come! |
| Here,we have Parliamentary Republic mixed with theocracy(not at the same level of Islam ofc),because of many a**holes priests,who are favored,when it comes to taxes,try to intervene into political decisions and curses people,who are not believers or homos.This system,would have been better,if the elections didn't have so many old farts,who vote political parties,that destroyed the country,because they were favored with money and half-assed jobs into the public sector or people who are ignorant about politics and believe,every shit they hear from bunches full of liars.I haven't lived under other types of political systems so I don't know,but democracy is a good system,under certain circumstances. |
MonkeyDHunterSep 2, 2016 9:56 AM
 |
| Cuban communism. - No terrorism unlike in America and Europe. - No huge race riots like in America. - No obsession with consumerism. - No high crime rate - No paying through your teeth for healthcare and education. |
 |
| I want my opinion to have some influence on the political landscape of my country so I`ll just stick with democracy. There will always be corrupt idiots in each state. |
 |
| Democracy is fine if the citizens are well-educated and well-informed. It's more possible in a country with not too high population. You'll be forced working 80 hours per week. Be careful what you wished for. |
I'm pretty sure all political systems suck, if the people running them suck. ^ThisWhen atheists are in control you get Communism. I didn't know I was a Communist but OK |
 Nico- said: Conversations with people pinging/quoting me to argue about some old post I wrote years ago will not be entertained@Comic_Sans oh no y arnt ppl dieing i need more ppl dieing rly gud plot avansement jus liek tokyo ghoul if erbudy dies amirite |
| Nah, I wouldn't really want to. I can't really think of a better government right now |
 |
PhilosophyFirst said: PoruMairu said: The system we have now is reasonable. It is not so much the system, than the shitheads that are in it. My preference is wherever (proper) Christians are in power and control. When atheists are in control you get Communism / hell. When Muslims are in control you get Islam / Sharia / hell. When Tribes are in control you get Famine and dystopia / hell. When Nationalist socialists get in control you end up with Progressive dystopia / genocide / hell. When Monarchs are in control you get good monarchs and evil monarchs / mixed bag. There probably has never been an actual democracy ever. It is a relief that your fantasies would not come into fruition. The best you can hope for is a Christian president who shares your, er, "proper" Christian values and qualities. Perhaps then they might hope to affect changes that would align with your suiting. Let us thank the balance of democracy for not allowing the fantasies and biases of one such as yourself to take control. I'm genuinely grateful for this. razor39999 said: Cool, I didn't even have to be the one to bring it up, but yeah benevolent dictatorships are the best possible system, and usually the one when a certain culture achieves its "golden age". Tito is also one of my favorite recent history leaders and I'm proud to be living in his home country, although not at all proud with our current leaders. If you want to go further back into history, Cyrus the Great is probably THE role model for how a benevolent dictator should rule. Any form of dictatorship is undesirable in the face of democracy. With dictatorships there is no sure-fire way to perpetuate these qualities of benevolence in their leaders. With dictatorships, control ultimately rests in the hands of one individual (or one group of individuals), and the quality of governance is always dependent on their personal qualities. It is irrational to think of such systems as morally preferable to democracy. And their unreliability is only a case for labeling it as political regression. Be thankful for your democracy if you live in one. Tyranny of the majority is a thing you know. In democracy there is no sure fire way to perpetuate benevolence. Once you have a benevolent dictator there is a good chance of them picking a good successor. Also that one individual can get guidance from public opinion and expert opinion. |
"Tyranny of the majority" means that the minority groups of people might not get their way in politics. This may happen but very often real issues are recognized the political body and dealt with, or campaigned for. Naturally if myself and 10 other people move into a country with completely unique political concerns that the majority don't care for, then I cannot expect to get my way. Decisions that suit the majority are reasonable, because in life, not everyone can get their way with things. It is an optimal system, democracy. In democracy we have a political body consisting of practically the entire population. Of course it's going to be "benevolent enough" lest it become terribly corrupted and cease to be a democracy. Now, your argument for benevolent dictators is wishful thinking. History has proven that dictatorships do not work. Time after time they have collapsed and failed. Do you honestly think you're going to get a line of benevolent dictators in succession within this ideal of yours? And how do you define a benevolent dictator? Why should I want to trust my political fate and living standards to one person who is "just so much more benevolent" than most other people? It's nonsense. There are too many huge, fundamental political problems of dictatorships in the first place. You don't have a good point, I'm afraid. It's a bad government that you're turning into a fantasy. |
I have amused myself As we all do, we poets--writing vows To Chloris, Phyllis--any pretty name-- You might have had a pocketful of them! Take it, and turn to facts my fantasies-- I loosed these loves like doves into the air; Give them a habitation and a home. Here, take it-- You will find me all the more Eloquent, being insincere! Come! |
| Believe it or not a country with a good dictator is desirable, sometimes you just need to get stuff done and the bureaucracy within democracy doesn't allow for that. A democracy is good with keeping the status quo while changing things very slowly, while a dictatorship is good at getting things done and when you have a dictator that has the best interests of the state in his mind it can be good. |
 |
| Any dictatorship if the world could somehow produce one decent, reliable and capable person who'd be that leader, unfortunately that happens once in a blue moon. Democracy is only a good thing if the responsible population/demographic has a decent head on their shoulders.Something which hasn't been the case since ancient Greece. |
 |
PhilosophyFirst said: "Tyranny of the majority" means that the minority groups of people might not get their way in politics. This may happen but very often real issues are recognized the political body and dealt with, or campaigned for. Naturally if myself and 10 other people move into a country with completely unique political concerns that the majority don't care for, then I cannot expect to get my way. Decisions that suit the majority are reasonable, because in life, not everyone can get their way with things. It is an optimal system, democracy. In democracy we have a political body consisting of practically the entire population. Of course it's going to be "benevolent enough" lest it become terribly corrupted and cease to be a democracy. Now, your argument for benevolent dictators is wishful thinking. History has proven that dictatorships do not work. Time after time they have collapsed and failed. Do you honestly think you're going to get a line of benevolent dictators in succession within this ideal of yours? And how do you define a benevolent dictator? Why should I want to trust my political fate and living standards to one person who is "just so much more benevolent" than most other people? It's nonsense. There are too many huge, fundamental political problems of dictatorships in the first place. You don't have a good point, I'm afraid. It's a bad government that you're turning into a fantasy. When was the last time you saw a tyrant go after a majority? They always go after minorities. If the majority votes to have your rights stripped they will get their way. They can even vote to have you killed. Also no the democracy we have in most countries is not a real democracy. It does not involve the whole population it really only is controlled by elites in many countries that only have their interests in mind not yours. You're just blind to see all the wars and violence brought on by these governments claiming to be a democracy but arent. When was the last time you voted for a war? You are selectively picking dictatorships that didn't work while ignoring ones that did. |
| Any system of government where the smart rule over the stupid and every intelligent person has a chance to do what they want. Kinda like an aristocratic republic but where only the smart have a voice. |
| I've been here way too long... |
| My political science professor convinced me that a monarchy is actually the best type of government, so long as the ruling patriarch listens to the will of his people. Democracies are slow to act since lawmakers and politicians have to quibble among themselves for the most trifle of matters and almost never get anything done. It also allows corruption to be more widespread. So yeah a monarchy with a good king for me. |
   I envy your delusion; I wish I could live in it  |
| Aside from a democrazy, I'd rather live in a Monarchy. Where one intelligent individual (king/queen) rules the state with the intent of serving public interest. |
| A monarchy wouldn't be that bad. I think the UK is like that still, right? |
 |
| Yes, I'd like to live in a direct democracy thank you very much. |
UnpopularAnime said: A monarchy wouldn't be that bad. I think the UK is like that still, right? Not really. Their monarchs don't really have much political power and are more so symbolic figureheads. They have a parliament system and voting. I might be a little off on this. |
More topics from this board
» Am i?!! The only one crying invisible tears or some of y'all do too?French-Japanese - 2 hours ago |
6 |
by French-Japanese
»»
31 seconds ago |
|
» How do you process death?Lightskynight - Apr 14 |
26 |
by Lightskynight
»»
2 minutes ago |
|
» What do you think about law enforcement (police) in your country?Sad - 3 hours ago |
11 |
by LightWorker
»»
4 minutes ago |
|
» Does ours username claimz who really are?French-Japanese - 7 hours ago |
19 |
by DesuMaiden
»»
7 minutes ago |
|
» What does your username mean?DesuMaiden - 11 hours ago |
23 |
by Kwanthemaster
»»
9 minutes ago |