Forum Settings
Forums

Why do oly Japan, Korean or Chinese animes are accepted

New
Aug 11, 2016 4:22 PM
#1
Offline
Aug 2016
13
Why does oly Japan, Korean or Chinese animes are accepted? It's not because it's from an other contry thant it's isn't an anime (like RWBY)
GoldiizzJan 12, 2017 6:43 AM
Aug 11, 2016 5:23 PM
#2

Offline
Oct 2014
15239
The definition needs to be objective, no subjective. Even if RWBY is subjectively an anime, Tsumiki no Ie subjectively isn't so this shouldn't be the rule we go by. There would be a lot more arguments if anime were added because "they seemed anime-y enough" or were removed because "eh, it's really that anime-like". If that were the case it would have to be left to a vote and the entries might not even be static, which would be very confusing. It's best left the way it is.
Aug 12, 2016 5:29 AM
#3
Offline
Aug 2016
13
Ok I understand ^^
Thanks
Aug 12, 2016 7:03 AM
#4

Offline
Sep 2012
1451
Also how does anime look like? Think back of the first anime to appear, it was inspired by Walt Disneys cartoons and looked pretty similar.
Trying to watch all available anime series so you won't have to anymore, the list of anime I can recommend is still in progress, tho
Aug 30, 2016 2:45 AM
#5

Offline
Sep 2015
24
the term "anime" is only used to describe asian cartoon or asian animated series; simply bc they pronounce the word "animation" as "anime". if this wasn't the case then you'd find voltron here.
Aug 30, 2016 3:40 AM
#6

Offline
May 2014
67
You lost me at your grammar.

Just kidding, but I see others have already explained it to you.
Sep 2, 2016 5:23 PM
#7

Offline
Jan 2014
16259
Sep 12, 2016 7:19 PM
#8

Offline
Jun 2014
5365
Still don't get why Korean and Chinese animation is classified as anime, it should only be listed if they had assistance or funding from Japanese animation studios. The argument for why the entirety of Western animation isn't on here is because it's not from Japan, yet some random CG Korean children's cartoon can be on here because it's Asian? If this argument holds, then Indian or Thai animation should be anime too, no?

There's too many inconsistencies in this argument, it should be revised in a similar fashion to Manhwa/Manhua guidelines requiring physical publication, such as having Japanese production or staff involved.
Sep 13, 2016 6:46 PM
#9

Offline
Jan 2011
3324
Jerkhov said:
Still don't get why Korean and Chinese animation is classified as anime, it should only be listed if they had assistance or funding from Japanese animation studios. The argument for why the entirety of Western animation isn't on here is because it's not from Japan, yet some random CG Korean children's cartoon can be on here because it's Asian? If this argument holds, then Indian or Thai animation should be anime too, no?


The argument for excluding Western animation is that it's not from Japan/Mainland China/Hong Kong/South Korea/North Korea. Not just Japan. Japan just happens to provide 99% of this database so it's easier to just say Japan.

See here for why other Asian countries are excluded.

Jerkhov said:

There's too many inconsistencies in this argument, it should be revised in a similar fashion to Manhwa/Manhua guidelines requiring physical publication, such as having Japanese production or staff involved.


If xyz anime needs Japanese production staff then there's no reason to include Korean or Chinese anime in the guidelines because then it would fall into Japan co-production territory which accepts any country already. Such as Oban Star Racers which is Japan+France.
Since Korea and China are no longer special then the entire manhua and manhwa database would be removed because we no longer see Korea or China as equals. The manhwa and manhua guidelines for physical releases is to combat web portals like Naver where anyone can post their shitty stickfigure webcomic and call it manhwa. Japan is pretty strict and doesn't have that issue to begin with (digital magazines being the same as print one with editors, legality, copyrights, registration with the government, etc.) --all the same the guidelines already reject such items anyway under the doujinshi clause so a manga from Pixiv wouldn't be accepted either even though it looks hella well-made and might have a bajillion people reading it. Until that manhwa/manhua gets a physical release by a reputable publishing company (so no self-printing) it is no different than the bajillion doujinshi in Japan.
Sep 13, 2016 7:19 PM

Offline
Jun 2014
5365
@lanblade seems about what I expected from the reasoning for the inconsistencies, certain guidelines are too culturally established to be changed

More topics from this board

Sticky: » Anime DB - Post Genre/Theme Requests Here ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )

Kineta - Mar 28, 2022

681 by SurgingSoulZX »»
2 minutes ago

Sticky: » Anime DB - Post Modification Requests Here ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )

cyruz - May 15, 2016

8682 by arsonal »»
7 hours ago

» My Daemon ( 1 2 )

marcolacson - Nov 26, 2023

50 by veduHMY »»
Yesterday, 3:36 PM

» will the Scott Pilgrim anime be added to the database? ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )

GanjiTheDude - Mar 30, 2023

756 by YoshiYogurt »»
Apr 20, 1:12 PM

» Could we stop having Justin Cook at the start of every anime entry's staff list?

El-Melloi - Jul 29, 2023

10 by MadanielFL »»
Apr 20, 11:44 AM
It’s time to ditch the text file.
Keep track of your anime easily by creating your own list.
Sign Up Login