New
Nov 16, 2015 1:16 PM
#51
Objects don't reproduce |
Nov 16, 2015 1:21 PM
#52
Evildragon16 said: Market English is one of the easiest languages to learn to that level. English has by far the largest vocabulary of any language which makes it harder to master as a second language than other languages.zombie_pegasus said: Evildragon16 said: Currently learning french .Yup it's damn annoying how object have 'Le' or 'La' tied to them .Worse still is that there isn't a set system for deciding which is which . I used to think English was easy since I grew up with it .When I started learning french and saw that the madness in it was just as bad I was shocked . Personally I think English should be counted as one of the harder languages . The French word "dessin", the Spanish word "deis" and the Japanese word "desu" can all be pronounced the same way. I would spell it out in English as "dace". I think tonal languages would be the hardest to learn. |
Nov 16, 2015 1:22 PM
#53
zombie_pegasus said: Just use "generic He" for Persons. It's a practicable, traditional Way to refer to someone whose biological Sex is unknown.I think English should really have a gender neutral third person pronoun. Using the plural "they" for a single human that you don't know the gender of sounds awkward. Calling an animal "it" sounds rude in my opinion especially if you know the gender of the animal. It also feels bad to call someone "he" or "she" and guess the wrong gender. As if an Animal would complain whether I use "das Huhn" (neuter) (the Hen) or "die "Henne" (female) (the Hen) to it. Again, how often do you directly call someone with "he" or "she"? I would use "you" to refer to someone when speaking with him (generic He), but what about you? |
Nov 16, 2015 1:25 PM
#54
zombie_pegasus said: I use singular they all the time. English also lacks plural "you" except for "y'all" and "yous". Also its lacking in "us", "we", and "ours"that differentiate if it includes the person youre speaking to or not.Noboru said: I think English should really have a gender neutral third person pronoun. Using the plural "they" for a single human that you don't know the gender of sounds awkward. Calling an animal "it" sounds rude in my opinion especially if you know the gender of the animal. It also feels bad to call someone "he" or "she" and guess the wrong gender.zombie_pegasus said: traed said: I didn't know that word had that meaning. The way he capitalized it I thought he meant something else.zombie_pegasus said: No the word is neuter.@Noboru Could you say the word "Neuter" in German? In English that word means to remove the male organs from an animal. I guess that could be considered "degendering" it, but I think you're probably trying to say something else. I would guess "neutral" but I could be wrong. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_gender#Overview ("it" and "its" in English) Noboru capitalizes his nouns even when writing in English BTW. Noboru said: But there is a generic "she"as well in some cases and genderic "he" sets up assumptions that a person must be male by default which could lead to problems in falsifying memories for crimes for instance. Just use "generic He" for Persons. It's a practicable, traditional Way to refer to someone whose biological Sex is unknown. As if an Animal would complain whether I use "das Huhn" (neuter) (the Hen) or "die "Henne" (female) (the Hen) to it. Again, how often do you directly call someone with "he" or "she"? I would use "you" to refer to someone when speaking with him (generic He), but what about you? |
traedNov 16, 2015 1:30 PM
Nov 16, 2015 1:29 PM
#55
traed said: There isn't anything you can't specify like "both of us (and ...), we..." or "me and the others, we..." or "you two/three...".English also lacks plural "you" except for "y'all" and "yous". Also its lacking in "us", "we", and "ours"that differentiate if it includes the person youre speaking to or not. |
Nov 16, 2015 1:32 PM
#56
Noboru said: That gets a bit awkward for casual conversation otherwise people would do it. Hardly anyone does it except in writing.traed said: There isn't anything you can't specify like "both of us (and ...), we..." or "me and the others, we..." or "you two/three...".English also lacks plural "you" except for "y'all" and "yous". Also its lacking in "us", "we", and "ours"that differentiate if it includes the person youre speaking to or not. |
Nov 16, 2015 1:33 PM
#57
Noboru said: "You" is gender neutral. "He" and "she" are third person pronouns meaning that they are used to refer to people who you are not directly talking to. Most people don't use the generic "he" and will get offended if you call their female friend "he".zombie_pegasus said: Just use "generic He" for Persons. It's a practicable, traditional Way to refer to someone whose biological Sex is unknown.I think English should really have a gender neutral third person pronoun. Using the plural "they" for a single human that you don't know the gender of sounds awkward. Calling an animal "it" sounds rude in my opinion especially if you know the gender of the animal. It also feels bad to call someone "he" or "she" and guess the wrong gender. As if an Animal would complain whether I use "das Huhn" (neuter) (the Hen) or "die "Henne" (female) (the Hen) to it. Again, how often do you directly call someone with "he" or "she"? I would use "you" to refer to someone when speaking with him (generic He), but what about you? |
Nov 16, 2015 1:41 PM
#58
traed said: Normally, such Things are clear from the Context. If something's unclear, you can still specify it afterwards.Noboru said: That gets a bit awkward for casual conversation otherwise people would do it. Hardly anyone does it except in writing.traed said: English also lacks plural "you" except for "y'all" and "yous". Also its lacking in "us", "we", and "ours"that differentiate if it includes the person youre speaking to or not. zombie_pegasus said: Yes, and "you" is the Form you use when you address someone. How often do you talk with People about People you don't know about his or her Sex where your Conversation Partner knows about it?"You" is gender neutral. "He" and "she" are third person pronouns meaning that they are used to refer to people who you are not directly talking to. Most people don't use the generic "he" and will get offended if you call their female friend "he". |
Nov 16, 2015 1:45 PM
#59
Noboru said: Not too often, but it does happen sometimes. Usually I just call them "they" until the other person refers to them as either "he" or "she". Sometimes it can feel even weirder when you know their name but it's a gender neutral name.zombie_pegasus said: Yes, and "you" is the Form you use when you address someone. How often do you talk with People about People you don't know about his or her Sex where your Conversation Partner knows about it?"You" is gender neutral. "He" and "she" are third person pronouns meaning that they are used to refer to people who you are not directly talking to. Most people don't use the generic "he" and will get offended if you call their female friend "he". |
Nov 16, 2015 1:45 PM
#60
Well that happens a lot though. Misunderstandings happen that way. Does hair have a gender in any gendered language? That would get confusing. |
Nov 16, 2015 1:47 PM
#61
Nov 16, 2015 2:05 PM
#62
zombie_pegasus said: Just use what you feel most comfortable with. If someone felt extremely offended over some slight Thing like accidentally referring to a Person whose Sex or even worse "Gender" I don't know with the wrong Pronouns, then I'd immediately say goodbye to him.Not too often, but it does happen sometimes. Usually I just call them "they" until the other person refers to them as either "he" or "she". Sometimes it can feel even weirder when you know their name but it's a gender neutral name. traed said: Neuter in German, but that's usually male in Languages with two Genders.Does hair have a gender in any gendered language? |
NoboruJan 16, 2016 1:01 PM
Nov 17, 2015 12:18 AM
#63
zombie_pegasus said: Noboru said: I think English should really have a gender neutral third person pronoun. Using the plural "they" for a single human that you don't know the gender of sounds awkward. Calling an animal "it" sounds rude in my opinion especially if you know the gender of the animal. It also feels bad to call someone "he" or "she" and guess the wrong gender.zombie_pegasus said: traed said: I didn't know that word had that meaning. The way he capitalized it I thought he meant something else.zombie_pegasus said: No the word is neuter.@Noboru Could you say the word "Neuter" in German? In English that word means to remove the male organs from an animal. I guess that could be considered "degendering" it, but I think you're probably trying to say something else. I would guess "neutral" but I could be wrong. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_gender#Overview ("it" and "its" in English) I agree about referring to animals as 'it'. I'm not much with animal rights but animals have gender and are not an object. |
WEAPONS - My blog, for reviews of music, anime, books, and other things |
Nov 17, 2015 5:36 AM
#64
TheBrainintheJar said: I would use the respective Form (f.i.: Tomcat for a male Cat or just Cat for a female Cat) and refer to it as a he or she, but if it's about the Animal "Cat" and I don't even know the Name or can't match it with its biological Sex, I use "it" in English and the respective, grammatical Gender in German.I agree about referring to animals as 'it'. I'm not much with animal rights but animals have gender and are not an object. |
Nov 17, 2015 7:42 AM
#65
Noboru said: TheBrainintheJar said: I would use the respective Form (f.i.: Tomcat for a male Cat or just Cat for a female Cat) and refer to it as a he or she, but if it's about the Animal "Cat" and I don't even know the Name or can't match it with its biological Sex, I use "it" in English and the respective, grammatical Gender in German.I agree about referring to animals as 'it'. I'm not much with animal rights but animals have gender and are not an object. Sounds reasonable. This should be added to textbooks. |
WEAPONS - My blog, for reviews of music, anime, books, and other things |
Nov 17, 2015 11:50 AM
#66
We have that in Serbian. The ending letter will always imply what gender the object is. We have masculine, feminine and neuter. Their existance is justified because they're needed when the words change with cases, although some words can be of multiple genders because the ending letter which signifies the gender can be changed at will and will still make sense, it's just a matter of preference. |
Nov 17, 2015 12:15 PM
#67
In my mothertongue,Slovak,they do. |
Nov 17, 2015 12:20 PM
#68
I see no real advantage to gendering objects. I think it would be more useful to identify the object as liquid, solid, or gas in the word. Maybe identify an object as food or non food. That way even if its something someone has never heard of they have a vague idea what it is. |
Nov 17, 2015 1:04 PM
#69
TheBrainintheJar said: This is just traditional Grammar. Noboru said: TheBrainintheJar said: I agree about referring to animals as 'it'. I'm not much with animal rights but animals have gender and are not an object. Sounds reasonable. This should be added to textbooks. Nuvviveji said: It doesn't work that well with German, but it's a similar Principle. We have that in Serbian. The ending letter will always imply what gender the object is. In our Language it's used to distinguish Homonyms like "der Tau" (male) = "Dew" and "das Tau" (neuter) = "Rope", analogous to "das Seil" (meaning the same Thing). What Genders do the Words "Sun", "Moon" and "Bridge" have btw.? DejWo said: How many and which one is "Sun", "Moon" and "Bridge" respectively?In my mothertongue,Slovak,they do. traed said: While that Approach would bring Practicability in the Usage, it would trade off the Beauty and Soul of a Language for it.I see no real advantage to gendering objects. I think it would be more useful to identify the object as liquid, solid, or gas in the word. Maybe identify an object as food or non food. That way even if its something someone has never heard of they have a vague idea what it is. Keeping the Gender keeps the emotional Attachment to the Words like neuter Terms can be more often than not cute little Things when a Diminutive is used, female Terms can have their Elegance and male Terms their reassuring and soothing Intonation. |
Nov 17, 2015 1:06 PM
#70
Noboru said: DejWo said: How many and which one is "Sun", "Moon" and "Bridge" respectively?In my mothertongue,Slovak,they do. Sun is "it",in-between. Both Moon and Bridge are male nouns. |
Nov 17, 2015 1:09 PM
#71
in Portuguese, Sun is a "he" each noun is assigned either a female or male article o/um "male article", a/uma "female article" ex: o sol "the sun", a casa "the house", um carro "a car", uma fazenda "a farm", etc. |
You can buy lossless digital music from your favorite Japanese artists on https://ototoy.jp/. The songs are all DRM-free and you can re-download your purchased albums as you wish. Show your support to your favorite artist if you can! ps. if you are looking for Japanese albums, you have to search it in Japanese (not romaji). Just copy and paste the name. For those who want to learn Japanese through anime Resources for learning the language |
Nov 17, 2015 1:19 PM
#72
DejWo said: Thanks, that's interesting, because it's mostly Germanic Languages that have Sun as "she", while Romance Languages and Welsh seems to have "he". The Gender in the Slovac Language fits exactly the Gender of the Proto-Indo-European Word.Noboru said: DejWo said: In my mothertongue,Slovak,they do. Sun is "it",in-between. Both Moon and Bridge are male nouns. So Sun has its very, very original Gender, Moon has it like the Germanic Ending and Bridge like the Romance one? Just a few follow-up Questions, if you don't mind: 1): what's your very first Impression when you hear "the Sun" in your native Tongue? 2): same Question as above, but with "the Moon" 3): same Question as above, but with "the Bridge"? This is what comes to Mind for me first: 1) a warm and lovely Light shining cheerful 2) a tranquil and soothing little Ball in the Night Sky 3) an elegant, ornate Building connecting People and Things |
Nov 17, 2015 1:20 PM
#73
Noboru said: Then why not just something to identify growing and moving objects? It would be applied to plants, animals, vehicles, clouds, ocean waves, rain, the planets and stars. It would be an indicator of a type of life without having to gender it and it would be fairly consistent in usage. It would still have similar effect.traed said: While that Approach would bring Practicability in the Usage, it would trade off the Beauty and Soul of a Language for it.I see no real advantage to gendering objects. I think it would be more useful to identify the object as liquid, solid, or gas in the word. Maybe identify an object as food or non food. That way even if its something someone has never heard of they have a vague idea what it is. Keeping the Gender keeps the emotional Attachment to the Words like neuter Terms can be more often than not cute little Things when a Diminutive is used, female Terms can have their Elegance and male Terms their reassuring and soothing Intonation. |
Nov 17, 2015 1:27 PM
#74
traed said: That's what Cases are for. Moving is mostly with "Accusative" (direct Object) in German, e.g.: auf die Toilette => to the Toilet and indicating the Place (Locus) auf der Toilette => on the Pot in "Dative" Case (indirect Object).Then why not just something to identify growing and moving objects? It would be applied to plants, animals, vehicles, clouds, ocean waves, rain, the planets and stars. It would be an indicator of a type of life without having to gender it and it would be fairly consistent in usage. It would still have similar effect. I think I've read about some Languages that divide Objects in animated and inanimated ones, but I can't recall it right now. But then you couldn't impersonate an Object as a normal Person as easily as it would be with a designated, grammatical Gender. |
Nov 17, 2015 1:33 PM
#75
Not necessarily. Personification is used in English all the time even though its not really a gendered language too much. People call an object "he"or "she" on their personal preference instead of grammatical rules. |
Nov 17, 2015 1:43 PM
#76
They can, but it feels fake. |
Nov 17, 2015 1:44 PM
#77
in a few languages it they do |
"If you tremble with indignation at every injustice, then you are a comrade of mine" When the union's inspiration through the workers' blood shall run There can be no power greater anywhere beneath the sun Yet what force on earth is weaker than the feeble strength of one For the Union makes us strong |
Nov 17, 2015 1:59 PM
#78
DateYutaka said: There are more Languages with Genders than without.in a few languages it they do |
Nov 17, 2015 2:29 PM
#79
Nuvviveji said: We have that in Serbian. The ending letter will always imply what gender the object is. Noboru said: It doesn't work that well with German, but it's a similar Principle. In our Language it's used to distinguish Homonyms like "der Tau" (male) = "Dew" and "das Tau" (neuter) = "Rope", analogous to "das Seil" (meaning the same Thing). What Genders do the Words "Sun", "Moon" and "Bridge" have btw.? Sunce, to sunce. It's neuter. Mesec, taj mesec. It's masculine. Most, taj most. It's masculine. Basically if the word ends in a consonant it's masculine. If it end with the vowel 'e','o' it's neuter. If it ends with the vowel 'a' it's feminine. This is for singular, different rules apply for plural forms. EDIT: Also forgot to mention: In singular 'to' goes before a neuter world, 'ta' goes before a feminine word and 'taj' goes before a masculine word. As for plural 'ti' is for masculine, 'te' is for feminine and 'ta' is for neuter. |
UltvejNov 17, 2015 2:36 PM
Nov 17, 2015 2:36 PM
#80
Nuvviveji said: Thanks, it's the same as with the Slovak Language, then, so I guess that the Slavic Languages have the same Genders for the same Things at least for those three Examples.Sunce, to sunce. It's neuter. Mesec, taj mesec. It's masculine. Most, taj most. It's masculine. Basically if the word ends in a consonant it's masculine. If it end with the vowel 'e','o' it's neuter. If it ends with the vowel 'a' it's feminine. This is for singular, different rules apply for plural forms. If you don't mind, what's the very first Association you have when you read or hear "(to) Sunce", "(taj) Mesec" and "(taj) Most" ? |
Nov 17, 2015 2:44 PM
#81
Noboru said: Why would it feel fake when they give it to an object they love rather than just all objects?They can, but it feels fake. |
Nov 17, 2015 2:50 PM
#82
Gendered objects have always come across as weird to me, but I wouldn't go as far as to call it stupid. Although they do make learning some languages a bother. Hell, Finnish doesn't have gender-specific pronouns for people either: "hän" suffices for both of them. And even then it's rather common (albeit very informal) to just refer others (in third person) with our equivalent of it, "se". |
Nov 17, 2015 2:54 PM
#83
Noboru said: I don't know....'Sun' reminds me of being awake, 'Moon' of being asleep as for 'Bridge' it reminds me of having only one choice.Nuvviveji said: Thanks, it's the same as with the Slovak Language, then, so I guess that the Slavic Languages have the same Genders for the same Things at least for those three Examples.Sunce, to sunce. It's neuter. Mesec, taj mesec. It's masculine. Most, taj most. It's masculine. Basically if the word ends in a consonant it's masculine. If it end with the vowel 'e','o' it's neuter. If it ends with the vowel 'a' it's feminine. This is for singular, different rules apply for plural forms. If you don't mind, what's the very first Association you have when you read or hear "(to) Sunce", "(taj) Mesec" and "(taj) Most" ? |
Nov 17, 2015 2:57 PM
#84
Isn't it like that for german and french? |
Brace yourself. Soon as LotGH 2017 comes out. The anime community is going to become so cancerous you will need to take cover and hide. |
Nov 17, 2015 3:19 PM
#85
Kousoku11 said: Finnish is both gender neutral and genderless as far as I know. Gendered objects have always come across as weird to me, but I wouldn't go as far as to call it stupid. Although they do make learning some languages a bother. Hell, Finnish doesn't have gender-specific pronouns for people either: "hän" suffices for both of them. And even then it's rather common (albeit very informal) to just refer others (in third person) with our equivalent of it, "se". Is something like boyfriend and girlfriend or husband and wife gender neutral as well? |
Nov 17, 2015 3:25 PM
#87
Are dildos masculine or feminine in gendered languages? lol |
Nov 17, 2015 3:45 PM
#89
traed said: Nah. Nouns like that can be gender-specific as much as in English.Is something like boyfriend and girlfriend or husband and wife gender neutral as well? Related to that though, we do have a suffix -tar/tär which is basically English's -ess. It's not used nowadays when applicable due to gender equality reasons (I think), but ends up being necessary in some cases. It can also come off as kind of oldish imo. EDIT: Going to contribute to this one as well while I'm at it, even if it's a bit of a tangent. TheBrainintheJar said: Twists like that don't mesh well with Finnish for an exact opposite reason: genders are easy to hide, but at the same time it's harder to actually reveal the gender. Whenever those kinds of reveals get translated they more often than not come off as very clunky.The gender-hiding is useful in literature. I once wrote a short story whose main character's gender is not known until midway through. You couldn't do it in Hebrew. |
Kousoku11Nov 17, 2015 4:14 PM
Nov 17, 2015 4:02 PM
#90
TheBrainintheJar said: The gender-hiding is useful in literature. I once wrote a short story whose main character's gender is not known until midway through. You couldn't do it in Hebrew. Actually, you could do a similar thing in Russian, but it would be painful - past verbs demand gender. Each language has its specifics. I read a short story by a popular Russian author, which read like a love story, but it actually was about a cat, as it turns out in the last sentence. Wouldn't be that easy in English, cause cats are called "it" normally, in Russia the cat is female. But I get what you're saying, I also find it relaxing about English sometimes. [quote=Noboru] traed said: Does hair have a gender in any gendered language?[/spoiler]Neuter in German, but that's usually male in Languages with two Genders. Yep, male in Russian. |
deadoptimistNov 17, 2015 4:09 PM
Nov 17, 2015 4:09 PM
#91
worldeditor11 said: My computer is a she. I just know it. Same, the hole is just difficult to spot. |
Steam: Zeemanhuismerk |
Nov 17, 2015 4:14 PM
#92
Noboru said: Just a few follow-up Questions, if you don't mind: 1): what's your very first Impression when you hear "the Sun" in your native Tongue? 2): same Question as above, but with "the Moon" 3): same Question as above, but with "the Bridge"? This is what comes to Mind for me first: 1) a warm and lovely Light shining cheerful 2) a tranquil and soothing little Ball in the Night Sky 3) an elegant, ornate Building connecting People and Things 1. The source of light. 2. Beautiful full moon. 3. Long,elegant construction with many piers connecting two banks. |
Nov 17, 2015 4:25 PM
#93
Noboru said: Thanks, it's the same as with the Slovak Language, then, so I guess that the Slavic Languages have the same Genders for the same Things at least for those three Examples. If you don't mind, what's the very first Association you have when you read or hear "(to) Sunce", "(taj) Mesec" and "(taj) Most" ? Yeah, in Russian similarly: солнце (sun) /sonce/, neuter. луна (moon) /luna/, female. месяц (moon) /m'es'ac/, male. мост (bridge) /most/, male. /c/ is not an /s/, but a combination, like /ts/ We have two words for the moon. "Luna" is the most used name, "m'es'ac" is for crescent moon, also poetic (the same word as month, btw). |
Nov 17, 2015 4:27 PM
#94
Red_Keys said: We need to stop objectifying female objects. ^ this tbh. Forget the male ones though. Those don't matter. |
Nov 17, 2015 4:37 PM
#95
Ravioli_Ravioli said: Quite so. Better only to have the neuter ones so you can have more freedom of expression as a fluid.Red_Keys said: We need to stop objectifying female objects. ^ this tbh. Forget the male ones though. Those don't matter. |
Nov 17, 2015 4:58 PM
#96
I wonder if some countries have gender specific diets. Like someone will only eat male or female foods. |
Nov 17, 2015 5:07 PM
#97
Nov 17, 2015 5:26 PM
#98
Dimethylanime said: Can I touch your girl?Languages other than Hebrew have feminine/masculine objects. I love it. It's comforting to know that my guitar is a girl. |
Nov 17, 2015 6:01 PM
#99
It gives objectophilia more sense. Evildragon16 said: Currently learning french .Yup it's damn annoying how object have 'Le' or 'La' tied to them .Worse still is that there isn't a set system for deciding which is which . Here i found a tutorial to help you with that. |
More topics from this board
» Do you post your own original artwork onto social media?DesuMaiden - Apr 10 |
23 |
by Lost_Viking
»»
6 minutes ago |
|
» Are you e-famous? Are you an Internet celebrity?DesuMaiden - 8 hours ago |
18 |
by Kenrin
»»
21 minutes ago |
|
Poll: » Do you live with regrets?Lightskynight - 6 hours ago |
11 |
by Lost_Viking
»»
24 minutes ago |
|
» Is English your native language? ( 1 2 )DesuMaiden - Apr 16 |
52 |
by Oshieteoshiete4
»»
2 hours ago |
|
» What do you think about law enforcement (police) in your country?Sad - Apr 16 |
24 |
by bevarnow
»»
2 hours ago |