Anna_Cats said: DejWo said: we're not filthy INTJs.Or you are actually INTJs/different type,lol. Which could be further confirmed by your post floating. At least,in your case.  |
DejWo said: FloatingIdiot said: That test seems to be biased against INTP for whatever reason. Or you are actually INTJs/different type,lol. Which could be further confirmed by your post floating. At least,in your case. Explain this one please. I've long believed myself to be about 70% INTP 30% INFP. I don't really buy the "everyone is one of 16 types" idea though. Also, yes I'm definitely not a filthy INTJ, but that didn't even show up as a percentage. |
 |
| AWESOME. Seriously, after doing this test the dozen times it's shown up on MAL I always get INTJ. EminemVEVO said: Anna_Cats said: STOP No, there has to be a new personality thread every day. Yep, you just have to make a thread for everything you discover on the intenet. |
 |
| Well, INTJ. |
 |
DejWo said: MBTI is about which functions you use for processing information. You are not really 70% this type and 30% that. Your behaviour may be similar to the stereotype of that type,but that does not mean you process information that way. If I had to use an analogy,different personality types are like different algorithms. Show me the proof that "everyone either uses this combination of algorithms or that combination of algorithms" and I will buy the theory. |
|
I'm considered INFP for the regular MBTI test and Moog's. I'm surprised I wasn't close to ISFP though on Moog's, I use to score as ISFP and I still think I'm quite like that.  |
 |
| infp |
DejWo said: FloatingIdiot said: Show me the proof that "everyone either uses this combination of algorithms or that combination of algorithms" and I will buy the theory. lol,what proof do you want from psychology? Will I take brain apart or something? Only way to gain information is via observation. But if you assume to know better than psychologist,sure,go on. If you are going to defer to experts on the subject, the modern psychology consensus is against MBTI and cognitive functions models. |
|
Moog said: I would recommend this test 47% ESTJ 14% ENTJ 11% ESFJ 7% ISTP 6% ISTJ |
FragMentizedNov 8, 2015 10:20 AM
| Today they say you're crazy, tomorrow they will say you're a genious. |
| ISFJ |
 Click here to join our club Discord. Member or not, feel free to join. We are active everyday. |
| On that new test I scored. 96% ENFP 1% ENFJ 1% ENTP 1% INFP 0% ENTJ |
| Personality tests are pretty fucking stupid and non-consequential. What's the personality type for stubbornness again? |
Bernkastel said: What's big 5? is that another personality test like MBTI?khunter said: Personality tests are pretty fucking stupid and non-consequential. What's the personality type for stubbornness again? Openness to experience axis on Big5? |
| first stuff i was enfp-t Extraverted – 16%, Intuitive – 48%, Feeling – 16%, Prospecting – 48%, Turbulent – 24% second one i was 85% INFP 7% ENFP 3% INTP 2% ENTP 1% INFJ khunter said: Personality tests are pretty fucking stupid and non-consequential. What's the personality type for stubbornness again? intj |
 |
Bernkastel said: hmm, I'm going to try this.Dawn said: What's big 5? is that another personality test like MBTI? Yup, except Big5 tries to be empirical so it does have predictive value but each of the axis has a true good/bad. So in Big5 you can actually have a superior personality. The 5 axis are: Agreeableness - High = better Openness to experience - High = better Neuroticism - Low = better Extraversion - Debatable? High generally accepted as better Conscientiousness - High = better |
Bernkastel said: I think all of those are debatable on what is better. At least as far as the far end of things. Pretty much all the high or low ends of those have problems associated with them. Some more or less than others though.The 5 axis are: Agreeableness - High = better Openness to experience - High = better Neuroticism - Low = better Extraversion - Debatable? High generally accepted as better Conscientiousness - High = better |
Bernkastel said: If we discount the theory then all of this is moot. If we take the theory seriously, I can tell you with 100% certainty you do not resemble INTPs at all. What then? The only other type that would make some sense is INFP and I'm not dominated by feeling. |
|
| on that test I scored like this. I hope this isnt derailing because it's still my "personality types" OP! |
Bernkastel said: You misunderstood. I did not say that they could be the total opposite as what is debatable. What I said is that there is a certain point where it no longer is good. So saying high/low is good is just a generalization that overlooks the far end of that spectrum. Where that point is can be debated.traed said: I think all of those are debatable on what is better. At least as far as the far end of things. Pretty much all the high or low ends of those have problems associated with them. Some more or less than others though. I don't think there's a good argument that having high neuroticism (emotional instability), low openness (stubborn and close minded), low agreeableness or low conscientiousness (organization, self discipline) could be good. Maybe in really niche cases? |
Bernkastel said: FloatingIdiot said: What then? The only other type that would make some sense is INFP and I'm not dominated by feeling. Until I see someone in person I'm skeptical of how they're really like. From just your writing though, I would say INTJ is the most likely, and INTP isn't even second... or third. Care to explain a bit? What would be second and third? I've always felt most similar to other INTPs, and at odds with how INTJs see things. |
|
| 60% ISTP 14% INTP 8% ISTJ 3% ENTP 3% ESTP |
| Moog's test isn't working for me. What does "the operation timed out" mean anyway? |
 |
| infj |
Salvatia said: infj am search for famous infj like me wtf dis result  |
Bernkastel said: I was originally going to comment on this part, but, no. This is correct. Criticism of the applicability of the theory will rarely ever be a serious point they consider, more emphasis will be put on introspection for the internal consistency of the system. Bernkastel said: Well to be clear, it's not that an INTP would "ignore" you, in the negative sense (which you probably aren't implying, but again, as clarity). As long as such an argument was intuitively reasonable, an INTP would simply be content to agree and not reply because it's not necessary. And you know... it's kinda' embarrassing to write a one liner reply for the sake of it. If I wrote a serious practical critique on MBTI, an INTP will almost always ignore me and simply not reply. There is also a similar case though where an INTP would choose not to reply within a recent period of time, mull over the argument, and then decide if a reply was necessary (moreso on, as noted, issues of consistency). And even then, proceed not bother because of sheer laziness. |
| INTJ-A "Architect" Role: Analyst Strategy: Confident Individualism Introverted 66% Thinking 28% Initiative 30% Judging 54% Assertive 48% Right.. XD |
Brandon0493Nov 7, 2015 10:59 PM
Dawn said: mine is awful ; - ;on that test I scored like this. I hope this isnt derailing because it's still my "personality types" OP! |
Moog said: I would recommend this test for more accurate results. Why? Because online tests like the 16Personalities one suck. They don't take the cognitive functions--the meat of Jungian typology--into consideration. You can't be 'INTP but almost INTJ', because there is nothing similar about these types at all when it comes to how their brains work. Your responses in OP's test just shifts the percentage bar towards the Perceiving or Judging dichotomy, as if being late to work somehow makes you an INTP instead of INTJ if you're close towards either letter. It makes no sense, because the types are fundamentally different, lol. The test I linked actually relies on the cognitive functions, and I think that you'll find the results to be more accurate. Maybe you'll even get the same type. Reading about the cognitive functions is probably more helpful than taking tests. I got ISTJ for some reason, the dominant function is Si and I don't agree with that at all. This "16 personalities" thing is a load of bollocks imo. |
EminemNov 8, 2015 12:17 AM
| PERSONALITY: INTP ("THE LOGICIAN") VARIANT: ASSERTIVE ROLE: ANALYST STRATEGY: CONFIDENT INDIVIDUALISM |
 |
| Intp-a. |
| To Bernkastel: |
HalkenburgNov 8, 2015 12:40 AM
|
| Always ISTP. |
 |
| Always been an INFJ Just did the test that was posted on this thread anyways. 38% INFJ, 21% ENFJ, 13% INTJ Sounds pretty accurate |
ClawdsNov 8, 2015 1:42 AM
 |
| Okay, so I did this test to compare the result with others I did before. I got ... INTP xD Personality: INTP ("The Logician") Variant: Turbulent Role: Analyst Strategy: Constant Improvement - Mind - Introverted 74% - Energy - Observant 72% - Nature - Thinking 28% - Tactics - Prospecting 62% - Identity - Turbulent 33% http://www.16personalities.com/intp-personality Not sure which between INTP and INTJ I got the most at various tests, but I relate more to the INTP one. I do wonder what this Identity thingy means, I haven't seen it before. |
NyarlathothepNov 8, 2015 3:34 AM
 |
| ISTP-A |
 |
EminemVEVO said: Moog said: I would recommend this test for more accurate results. Why? Because online tests like the 16Personalities one suck. They don't take the cognitive functions--the meat of Jungian typology--into consideration. You can't be 'INTP but almost INTJ', because there is nothing similar about these types at all when it comes to how their brains work. Your responses in OP's test just shifts the percentage bar towards the Perceiving or Judging dichotomy, as if being late to work somehow makes you an INTP instead of INTJ if you're close towards either letter. It makes no sense, because the types are fundamentally different, lol. The test I linked actually relies on the cognitive functions, and I think that you'll find the results to be more accurate. Maybe you'll even get the same type. Reading about the cognitive functions is probably more helpful than taking tests. I got ISTJ for some reason, the dominant function is Si and I don't agree with that at all. This "16 personalities" thing is a load of bollocks imo. It is much more helpful to read about the cognitive functions. I don't think that any test is capable of being as accurate as your own conclusions if you've actually studied the system thoroughly. Most people don't have the time or interest to read into the underlying mechanics of the MBTI, so it's easy to understand why they are content with these tests, though. I also think it's stupid when these same people discredit the theory and brush it off as inaccurate without having any idea of how it works. Most people that complain are the ones that are taking these 16Personalities tests anyway, and complain that the results are inaccurate, but they probably don't realise that they might just be delusional and incapable of analysing their own behaviour, and thus provide answers that don't really reflect their true personality. That's not really an easy thing to do, though. I don't have any issues with people criticizing it, but at least provide some real arguments, and not some half-assed bullshittery that you pulled out of your ass. I'm pretty skeptic myself when it comes to MBTI, but at least I've done enough research to understand what its flaws are. The Big Five personality trait system is just as, if not, more interesting, imo. That being said, I still think the MBTI can be heaps of fun, and provide some insight into your personality if you enjoy reading about that stuff. I don't really think that the test is capable of telling you stuff about yourself that you didn't already know, though. |
MoogNov 8, 2015 3:55 AM
More topics from this board
Poll: » Would you like to be a sugar baby?Ejrodiew - Apr 10 |
19 |
by Rinrinka
»»
3 minutes ago |
|
» Do you remember The Godfather ?scarydragon - 3 minutes ago |
0 |
by scarydragon
»»
3 minutes ago |
|
» Is it a good idea to stay relatively anonymous online?DesuMaiden - 3 hours ago |
14 |
by Citrone39
»»
32 minutes ago |
|
Poll: » Do you live with regrets?Lightskynight - Apr 18 |
16 |
by LightWorker
»»
34 minutes ago |
|
» Are you e-famous? Are you an Internet celebrity?DesuMaiden - Apr 18 |
35 |
by whitebeartigtig
»»
39 minutes ago |