| MAL's entry designs were never based on common sense~ |
  |
| They both came out with LN volumes, the 3 year gap is meaningless since in the guidelines it states that entries can be re-opened. Haven't watched the OVA but it's probably not a story on it's own that has a beginning and an end, unless that was the case I don't see the problem of bundling random OVAs together. |
 |
AiCon said: Paulo27 said: But the first OVA was a self-contained story that had a beginning and an end. This new one should be the same thing.They both came out with LN volumes, the 3 year gap is meaningless since in the guidelines it states that entries can be re-opened. Haven't watched the OVA but it's probably not a story on it's own that has a beginning and an end, unless that was the case I don't see the problem of bundling random OVAs together. I actually didn't watch it when I made that comment but now that I have I can tell you that's not an OVA with a beginning and an ending, it was just 3 short stories, this one will probably be the same. |
|
| Then you might as well make it three episodes, since there's another one coming out next year. |
 |
Kokujin-kun said: I like how this only further proves the point that another entry is not a good idea, there's a special for the series which came in the BDs and then there's an OVA that came with the LN, there's one of each, with the one next year there'll be 2 OVAs and 1 special, the special and OVAs are seperate entries so there's only 2 episodes for this entry, not 3.Then you might as well make it three episodes, since there's another one coming out next year. |
|
More topics from this board
Poll: » Papa no Iukoto wo Kikinasai! OVA Episode 2 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 )Stark700 - Mar 24, 2015 |
183 |
by kizeroch
»»
Mar 3, 9:55 PM |
|
Poll: » Papa no Iukoto wo Kikinasai! OVA Episode 1 Discussion ( 1 2 )Stark700 - Jun 25, 2013 |
81 |
by HiljainenSipuli
»»
May 14, 2023 11:17 AM |
|
» PreviewStark700 - Apr 23, 2013 |
9 |
by LoneWizzy
»»
Mar 15, 2015 1:41 PM |