Nanet said: Uh, they're a pedo? There is no inference in this subject. You're a pedo. That's it. You can't put a label on a lifestyle. |
| I don't necessarily think that people who are sexually attracted to lolis and shotas are pedophiles, as it's just fiction. If you feel sexual attraction to real children, then you are. I get off on lolicon (and fucked up stuff in general) but I don't feel attracted to children in real life, lol. |
| well... i call somebody a pedophile if they love little children inappropriately. simple. |
weirdoe said: I don't necessarily think that people who are sexually attracted to lolis and shotas are pedophiles, as it's just fiction. If you feel sexual attraction to real children, then you are. I get off on lolicon (and fucked up stuff in general) but I don't feel attracted to children in real life, lol. What fucked up stuff are you talking about exactly? |
| Do they like anything in my sig? Their chances of being a pedo are greatly increased if they do. |
| Anyone who doesn't hate anime hasn't watched enough anime. - Anonymous |
TheFilthyCasual said: Do they like anything in my sig? Their chances of being a pedo are greatly increased if they do. Please elaborate on that, as I definitely don't see how the first three points increases one's chance of becoming a pedophile, when none of those characteristics solely apply to children. Heck, even the definition of loli is debatable, depending on whom you ask. And I don't even understand why we're still arguing over the whole loli/pedo thing. Why are people so concerned about other people's fantasies? As long as they don't apply them to any real people (underage or not), what harm does it do? |
| Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
AO968 said: Please elaborate on that, as I definitely don't see how the first three points increases one's chance of becoming a pedophile, when none of those characteristics solely apply to children. Heck, even the definition of loli is debatable, depending on whom you ask. And I don't even understand why we're still arguing over the whole loli/pedo thing. Why are people so concerned about other people's fantasies? As long as they don't apply them to any real people (underage or not), what harm does it do? Fantasies reflect deep desires. It's a very concerning issue to think another person is okay with sexualizing an underaged person. Say I have fantasies about killing people. It's very volatile, and considered a mental defect by most psychological stand points. Regardless of whether I have fantasies about killing males, females, real or digital, it is still considered the same all the way through. I would be recommended to therapies or treatments if I told any specialist that. The same can now be applied to lolicon. If you told any certified psychologist that you have sexual desires about 2d underaged children, they would recommend therapy. Why? Because you have a desire that could literally spiral to a deeper darker place. It's a desire that isn't just another fetish, it's immoral. The desire still remains in fantasies about sexual acts with a underaged person. Real or not. Sure it doesn't hurt anyone in the surface of it, but in no way does that diminish it. What if a person who is a lolicon is put into the same situation that their lolicon fetish shows displayed? How can you say that this person would be coherent enough to fight an obvious desire? Lolis are internally pedophiles. Please let this thread die already. |
| Where's your proof Causeez? I thought we got over certain myths. |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
| It's someone who is sexually attracted to the kiddies. XD |
| Someone who engages in intercourse with children and chose 3D over 2D. |
causeez said: AO968 said: Please elaborate on that, as I definitely don't see how the first three points increases one's chance of becoming a pedophile, when none of those characteristics solely apply to children. Heck, even the definition of loli is debatable, depending on whom you ask. And I don't even understand why we're still arguing over the whole loli/pedo thing. Why are people so concerned about other people's fantasies? As long as they don't apply them to any real people (underage or not), what harm does it do? Fantasies reflect deep desires. It's a very concerning issue to think another person is okay with sexualizing an underaged person. Say I have fantasies about killing people. It's very volatile, and considered a mental defect by most psychological stand points. Regardless of whether I have fantasies about killing males, females, real or digital, it is still considered the same all the way through. I would be recommended to therapies or treatments if I told any specialist that. The same can now be applied to lolicon. If you told any certified psychologist that you have sexual desires about 2d underaged children, they would recommend therapy. Why? Because you have a desire that could literally spiral to a deeper darker place. It's a desire that isn't just another fetish, it's immoral. What if a person who is a lolicon is put into the same situation that their lolicon fetish shows displayed? How can you say that this person would be coherent enough to fight an obvious desire? Lolicons have a desire to fuck a fictional character. That's wildly different from wanting to fuck a real child. And these characters don't even have to be children in-universe. There are plenty of lolis who are older than they appear, some of which are even fully grown adults. Can you still call it pedophilia if I feel attracted to adult women in childlike bodies? Lolis are internally pedophiles. How can a 'child' be a pedophile? Please let this thread die already. People need to learn to drop the subject altogether and stop making these insipid threads. What is the point of it, anyway? Why the intense need to play armchair psychologist and claim you know me better than I know myself? |
| Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
AO968 said: causeez said: Fantasies reflect deep desires. It's a very concerning issue to think another person is okay with sexualizing an underaged person. Say I have fantasies about killing people. It's very volatile, and considered a mental defect by most psychological stand points. Regardless of whether I have fantasies about killing males, females, real or digital, it is still considered the same all the way through. I would be recommended to therapies or treatments if I told any specialist that. The same can now be applied to lolicon. If you told any certified psychologist that you have sexual desires about 2d underaged children, they would recommend therapy. Why? Because you have a desire that could literally spiral to a deeper darker place. It's a desire that isn't just another fetish, it's immoral. What if a person who is a lolicon is put into the same situation that their lolicon fetish shows displayed? How can you say that this person would be coherent enough to fight an obvious desire? Lolicons have a desire to fuck a fictional character. That's wildly different from wanting to fuck a real child. And these characters don't even have to be children in-universe. There are plenty of lolis who are older than they appear, some of which are even fully grown adults. Can you still call it pedophilia if I feel attracted to adult women in childlike bodies? Lolis are internally pedophiles. How can a 'child' be a pedophile? Please let this thread die already. People need to learn to drop the subject altogether and stop making these insipid threads. What is the point of it, anyway? Why the intense need to play armchair psychologist and claim you know me better than I know myself? I love your points. To support your arguments, I'll say this. I fucking hate 3D children, but I wanna fuck 2D children. It doesn't have to be children. I wanna fuck 2D characters with pedo bodies. I love Shinobu. She's 1000 years old, but I love her for the kiddish body. I hate 3D children because they're whiny and annoying. |
 |
| If I cath them fucking a pre-pubescent child I will assume there is a 99% chance he is a pedo. |
| Do you think children are sexually attractive? Then you're a pedo. It's really not that complicated. |
| Somewhere, there is an unplugged toaster sitting on a Coleman stove. Does it feel lonely? |
| If they think little girls and boys are hot and bangable then yeah they are pedos, a good example is this guy  |
 |
Supercolin said: You turned the thread into that thoNudeBear said: hi im colin and i made a thread about having weird thoughts about my 10 year old sister It's cool though, I'm not attacking you. Just busting your balls. lol Ah, I see well that one thread was more about me being overly close with her not sexually attracted to her. Around the 6th page I admitted I had thoughts then that's what people made the thread about. .-. |
| I like young looking girls...because well...I'm young....I'd take a flat chested (not entirely) petite girl then some monster with milk jugs...but hey, at this point I'm getting neither |
Supercolin said: What lol?Gotsupermilk said: I like young looking girls...because well...I'm young....I'd take a flat chested (not entirely) petite girl then some monster with milk jugs...but hey, at this point I'm getting neither You are old man. |
hamammm said: Yeah, the term autistic really gets me sometimes too. In some cases, I hear it used, and I feel bad for the autistic people. That goes 2 ways though - autism shouldn't be flung around casually like that, and sometimes, people that are just being ridiculous and stupid are called that - and that really insults the autistic people more than it does the people who were just name called. I agree on this one. Autistic people are anything but stupid. You may think they aren't doing anything but they are quietly observing eveyone and everything which makes them smarter, sharper then we are and more aware of what is happening around them. But to answer your question, I don't think people who actually watch shows with younger girls should be considered a "pedo". If you would judge people by their taste for anime i guess a large amount of anime watchers would be considered 'rapers' or 'pedo's ' |
Yuukixx said: ...or the hentai they read....hamammm said: Yeah, the term autistic really gets me sometimes too. In some cases, I hear it used, and I feel bad for the autistic people. That goes 2 ways though - autism shouldn't be flung around casually like that, and sometimes, people that are just being ridiculous and stupid are called that - and that really insults the autistic people more than it does the people who were just name called. I agree on this one. Autistic people are anything but stupid. You may think they aren't doing anything but they are quietly observing eveyone and everything which makes them smarter, sharper then we are and more aware of what is happening around them. But to answer your question, I don't think people who actually watch shows with younger girls should be considered a "pedo". If you would judge people by their taste for anime i guess a large amount of anime watchers would be considered 'rapers' or 'pedo's ' |
Supercolin said: Yeah, the term is overused a lot. .-. That's all :) |
  |
Zer01 said: weirdoe said: I don't necessarily think that people who are sexually attracted to lolis and shotas are pedophiles, as it's just fiction. If you feel sexual attraction to real children, then you are. I get off on lolicon (and fucked up stuff in general) but I don't feel attracted to children in real life, lol. What fucked up stuff are you talking about exactly? Umm.. monster rape, insect rape and beastiality for example. Just anything kind of fucked up, really. |
| If you get aroused by little boys' anuses you're a pedo gay person. |
Coño! |
hamammm said: "You can't be a pedophile unless you're attracted to prepubescent individuals, not unrealistic depictions of what might be children."I have my own thoughts on this, but what are yours? |
  |
| People who are attracted to real life children. |
 |
| people who sexually assault children in any way shape or form. thats all there is to it really. |
simonephone said: people who sexually assault children in any way shape or form. thats all there is to it really. You're confusing pedophile with child molester. Contrary to what you seem to think, those two terms are not the same. A person doesn't have to be sexually attracted to a child to molest it, just like you don't have to be attracted to an adult man/woman to rape him/her. |
| Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
| If they desu desu desu and only talk about Naruto Bleach or One Piece. |
 |
| You guys are still here, arguing for nothing. Screw you guys, I'm going home. |
Rokumi said: Nanet said: If they desu desu desu and only talk about Naruto Bleach or One Piece. You're thinking about weeaboos... Are they not the same thing? |
| lol |
More topics from this board
» 2023-2024 NBA Season Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )deg - Jun 18, 2023 |
668 |
by Hitagi__Furude
»»
9 minutes ago |
|
» (Personality) Try to paste 3 different statements that matter to youIpreferEcchi - Yesterday |
14 |
by R-unknown
»»
38 minutes ago |
|
» Do you enjoy nature?Kamikaze_404 - 11 hours ago |
23 |
by Rhaelynne
»»
1 hour ago |
|
» I got spooked by a water bottletsukareru - 9 hours ago |
11 |
by Adverrito
»»
2 hours ago |
|
» What do you need cash for in your everyday life?MeanMrMusician - Apr 21 |
35 |
by KenaiPhoenix
»»
2 hours ago |