Tachii said: Funny topic, ironically, due to OP having the possibility to precisely do the same thing described of the youths in the scenario with his 'short-tempered' 'inheritive' trait.
And he is not the only one if you see some other posts. Lot's of people with the smartass behavior of "That's disgusting let's take them, torture them, rape them, pull their legs off" and other disgusting wishes.
Am quite certain that in different times this kind of people will be the ones making those crowds who celebrated around executions where people got burn alive or had there heads cut off.
orbitzz said: I get why you say "why THIS man?" but the thing is, where do you draw the line? it's a news story, it's supposed to get your attention. for the same exact reason that you hear about the girl who was surfing in the wrong place at the wrong time and managed to get her leg chewed off by a shark, this man was the one who was chosen - to sell a story. does anyone think that reporters go around going "hmmm, you only lost 1 leg, your case isn't bad enough, come back when you are completely limbless" ?
anyways, getting back to the point, the rationale that you should be fair and only publish stories about the worst atrocities of the world before you get back to the individuals is rather absurd in my opinion. obviously, stories about the groups being affected as a whole are being published, but it's easier to distance yourself when you forget about the individuals themselves, since they remain faceless to you.
another thing is that the person was probably chosen to appear in a story for an american newspaper, not an afghani one. why don't we hear about the afghani locals who step in landmines and lose limbs? frankly because we can't relate to him or her as much as we can relate to a fellow american. the news is SUPPOSED to be impartial, but we all know that there is only so much impartiality that can occur when their main job is to sell newspapers, since they are a business.
If this was about a killing or a robbery i would understand your argument. Even when people get killed we say "So what, it happens everyday" But your argument is correct, the reporters will report it even if thousands get killed in another country.
But an insult? No one reports insults? Insults are not news. It's too much of an everyday thing to be news. The reason they made an article about it and probably that the OP made the thread was because the guy was a soldier. And this doesn't look good to me.
So if the guy lost his legs in a traffic accident no one cares if people make fun of him but if he lost them in a war everybody becomes sensitive? It looks like the whole point wasn't to show how bad it is to make fun someone with a problem but just to make those soldiers look heroic or something like that. It's like an article payed by the government or made by a nationalist reporter.
Gunther75 said:
Most of the jobs in the military don't even involve fighting. So this is extremely untrue. If you want real mercenaries, look at Blackwater, which is full of people dishonorably discharged from service. You also seem quite full of angst, I'm not sure why.
I don't know if you think mercenaries have to be scumbags but you know they don't. Anyone who is doing it like a job so he can earn money it's a mercenary.
They usually are people who simply need money. The US army specifically targets young boys in poor neighborhoods.
Organizations like Blackwater who don't have the capacity of the US army to train new people usually prefer people with some experience and that's why they take lot's of people that were in the army in the past. Logically they will take lot's of dishonorably discharged since ex-military people who wish to continue doing the job are not found everywhere. |