New
Aug 19, 2016 10:45 PM
#1
you can read the whole post here - https://www.reddit.com/r/manga/comments/4ylnlr/bleach_was_not_as_popular_as_people_like_to_claim/ Bleach was very popular, but people like to greatly exaggerate just how popular it was. I'm not really taking sales into account here (which yeah, it did sell well, but not until after the anime), mainly just rankings So Bleach began serialization in 36/37 double issue on August 2001. It wouldn't be ranked until around issue 46. Up until the last issue of the year (issue 50) its ranks were between seventh and ninth place. The top 5 was pretty stable in those issues. The top two were consistently One Piece and Naruto. Prince of Tennis received 3rd place four times. Hikaru no Go received 3rd place 3 times. Yu-Gi-Oh received third place once, In 2002, Bleach fluctuated between the 7th place and 10th place range throughout the first half of the year. During the second half it fluctuated between 11th and 14th place. Usually in the latter. Once it ranked 15th.. Towards the very end of the year though, around the time Eyeshield 21 began ranking (which was immediately a top 5 dweller) it began ranking a bit higher. Going back to fluctuating between 8th and 9th place (usually One Piece, Naruto, Eyeshield 21, Prince of Tennis, Hikaru no Go, Shaman King, and Yu-Gi-Oh were all ahead of it though during these ranks) So throughout the entirety of 2002 Bleach dwelled in the middle of the magazine, mostly in the lower middle. It was not by any means an immediate smash hit unlike Eyeshield 21 which debuted in 2002 In 2003 Bleach continued to rank consistently around 8th place until the 9th issue when it ranked seventh, and the 10th and 11th issues, where it ranked 6th, and then finally the 13th issue where it ranked fifth. Took the series two years to finally rank within the top 5. That top 5 was One Piece, Eyeshield 21, Prince of Tennis, Naruto, and Bleach. Interesting top 5, shows that Eyeshield 21 and Prince of Tennis were even able to consistently give Naruto a run for its money in the rankings. Everybody talks about a big 3, but in reality Jump was so damn competitive at this time. Anyways, Bleach remained in 5th place until the 16th issue where it moved down to 6th. (so its first run in the top 5 only last 4 issues) Bleach then continued to flucuate between 6th and 7th place until issue 25 where it again maintained 5th place until issue 28, It then went back to flucuating between 6th and 8th place until issue 47 where it again ranked 5th which it maitained for the 48th issue before dropping down to 6th again in 49 where it stayed for the final few issues of the year. This series that people like to assume was a massive hit from the beginning didn’t rank within the top 5 until two years after it began serialization. And even then it never got any higher than 5 and only had that ranking 10 times. Now 2004 is when bleach got its anime. Bleach ranked around 6th place until issue 4 / 5 double issue that year. It received third place (with a top 5 of One Piece, Naruto, Bleach, Eyeshield 21, and Prince of Tennis). Bleach went down to 4th place in the next issue (Eyeshield 21 took its place in 3rd) and from then on it became a battle between Bleach and Eyeshield 21 for the 3rd and 4th spots (with Eyeshield winning more often than Bleach) until the 17th issue where Death Note overtook both Eyeshield 21 and Bleach, sending Bleach back to fifth place. Bleach jumped back though the next issue and took back third place and kept it until the 21st issue where BoBoBo a frequent top 10 dweller took the place and moved Bleach up to 4th and Eyeshield up to 5th. In the 22/23 double issue though, Bleach moved down to seventh place (with One Piece, Naruto, Eyeshield 21, BoBoBo, Prince of Tennis, and Death Note ahead of it). It remained in 7th place the next week, still being beaten by those same series. In the 25th issue it went back to five , four in the 26th and 27th. Before dropping back down to 6-7 until the 32nd issue where it went back to 5th place until the 37-38 double issue where it went to 4th again, before returning to 3rd place on the 40th and 41st issue before ranking 2nd for the very first time on the 2nd issue (with a top 5 one One Piece, Bleach, Naruto, Death Note, and BoBoBo) Bleach went back to 3rd place in the 43rd and 44th issue but went back to number 2 on the 45th issue (with the same top 5 as the last time it was 2nd) For the rest of the year Naruto and Bleach fought for the 2nd and 3rd place. Naruto winning out mostly, but Bleach got a good handful of second places. So 2004 is where we can truly say Bleach began doing pretty well, likely thanks to its anime. However, it still had heavyweights like Eyeshield 21 and Prince of Tennis ahead of it for the most part, as well as heavy competition with series like BoBoBo, Death Note, Shaman King, and even the newcomers that year of Reborn! D. Gray Man, Gintama, and Busou Renkin which were ranking top 10 by the end of the year. . Now in 2005 Bleach remained in the top 3 (usually at 3, occasionally at 2) up until the 19th issue where Eyeshield 21 took 3rd place. And in the 20th issue where Eyeshield 21 took 3rd and Death Note took 4th leaving Bleach with 5th, which repeated in the 21/22 double issue, and the 23rd and 24th issue where Death Note took 3rd, Bleach took 4th, and Eyeshield took 5th. . From the 25th 32nd issues; Bleach held 3rd place before losing it to Eyeshield 21 in the 33rd. Eyeshield kept 3rd place until 36/37 double issue where Bleach took it back, but Eyeshield took back 3rd place in issue 38 and 39 before Bleach got it back again in 40 and Bleach remained at third and Eyeshield at 4th for the remainder of the year. So in 2005 Bleach did pretty damn well, but it still faced competition from Eyeshield. 2006 began with Bleach and Eyeshield fighting over the 3rd and 4th spots, Bleach winning most of the battles, but Eyeshield still getting a notable amount of victories. Around issue 16 Bleach took the second spot up until issue 26 where Naruto took it back and Bleach went back down to 3rd place. Bleach remained in the top 3 for the rest of the year, usually staying in 3rd, but occasionally beating Naruto in second. In 2007 Bleach remained in the top 3 until issue 9-11 where 3rd and 4th place were taken by Reborn! And Eyeshield 21. Before coming back to 3rd place in issue 12. Bleach remained in 3rd place until issue 41 where Eyeshield 21 carried 3rd place until issue 48. On issue 47 Reborn! Obtained 4th place and pushed Bleach to 5th place, and then in issue 48, Reborn! Pushed Eyeshield 21 to 4th place and Bleach to 5th place by taking 3rd. Bleach came back to 3rd place in issue 49 and stayed there for the last few issues of the year. Again, another very good year for Bleach but not without competition. In 2008 Bleach remained at 3rd place until issue 34 where it took 4th place and Toriko took 3rd. Bleach got back into the top 3 for the remainder of the year, but around 2008 was when Jump was having a lot of trouble with creating a good highly popular lineup. 2009 began with Bleach continuing to hold 3rd place with Toriko right behind in 4th up until the 12th issue where Toriko took 3rd again which it held until the 22/23 double issue where Bleach went back to 3rd for the rest of the year. Bleach still did pretty well in 2009, but instead of Eyeshield 21 ending giving Bleach room to breathe, Toriko came up and proved to be a fierce competitor with the editorial department fully behind it. In 2010 Bleach kept third place until 36/37 double issue where Bakuman took third. On the 38th issue Toriko took third. In the 39th issue Bakuman took third, Toriko took 4th, and Bleach got pushed down to 5th up until issue 47 where Bleach was able to snag back 4th place again from Bakuman, and then Bleach went to 3rd place in issue 48 which it held for the remaining few issues of the year. Another good year for Bleach, but it was signaling the beginning of the end. In 2011 Bleach started with and kept 3rd place until issue 11 where Toriko took 3rd and Bleach took 4th. In issue 12 Toriko remained at third, but Gintama took 4th, and Bleach took 5th. In issue 13 Bakuman took 5th, and Bleach moved down to 6th place. It continued like that until issue 17 where Beelzebub took 6th place and Bleach moved down to the 7th. In issue 22, Sket Dance took 7th place and Bleach moved down to 8th. In issue 23 Magico jumped into 6th place bring Bleach all the way down to 9th. In issue 28, Reborn! Took 9th place and Bleach went down to 10th. Bleach continued dropping, going as low as 13 multiple times and didn’t receive a spot in the top 5 again until it ranked 5th in the 49th issue of the year, went down to 6th in the 50th and then returned to the 5th in the 51st and final issue of the year. Kind of a rough year for such a titan. Bleach began 2012 outside of the top 3 for the first time since 2006. Hovering around 8th-10th place until issue 8 where it began hovering around 10-12th place until it finally got back into the 5th place in the 14th issue, then went up to 4th place in the 15th which it held until the 23rd issue when Toriko and Sket Dance took both 3rd and 4th place and moved Bleach back up to 5th. Bleach left the top 5 and went back to 8th place on the 24th issue. Then dropped down to 11th-13th place until the 38th issue where it ranked 16th place. Bottom 3. Bleach never really recovered from this point and also lost its anime this year which probably contributed to the collapse in rankings. good info for me, im not much of a manga fan in general so its good to see some actual facts on the Bleach manga rankings with other popular manga over the years |
Aug 19, 2016 10:47 PM
#2
So Bleach sales already decline even before the anime ended. |
But it's important to remember that a movie review is subjective;it only gives you one person's opinion. http://www.classzone.com/books/lnetwork_gr08/page_build.cfm?content=analyz_media&ch=30 It doesn't matter if you like LoGH,Monster etc.If you are a jobless or college/school dropout living in your mom basement, you are still an unintelligent loser. Taste in anime does not make you a better person.If elitist don't exist, casual pleb and shit taste also don't exist. |
Aug 19, 2016 10:52 PM
#3
Zapredon said: So Bleach sales already decline even before the anime ended. yep, 2009 is when the Arrancar Arc appears it seems |
Aug 19, 2016 11:14 PM
#4
Aug 19, 2016 11:28 PM
#5
Some pretty interesting comments in there as well. I also would like to add that Bleach isn't unpopular because SJ don't promote it, it's because bleach is unpopular that SJ don't promote it. There's a reason why it's constantly in the bottom rankings week in week out Its TV anime was unpopular as well. People always like to try and claim that it was because it was too close to the manga, but if the series anime was still successful that wouldn't matter. One Piece and Naruto each have/had close gaps between the anime and the manga but they still continued on, just treated with padded as fuck pacing and/or massive amounts of filler. People like to ignore the fact that Bleach had laughably bad TV ratings at the end of its run. It's pretty clear that the OP of the post isn't talking how Bleach isn't popular or that it is doing horrible but that it isn't as big as some people claim it to be, which is true. All in all it's a pretty informative read, tnx for posting it. |
Aug 19, 2016 11:32 PM
#6
Aug 20, 2016 4:12 AM
#7
BigBoss said: Some pretty interesting comments in there as well. I also would like to add that Bleach isn't unpopular because SJ don't promote it, it's because bleach is unpopular that SJ don't promote it. There's a reason why it's constantly in the bottom rankings week in week out Its TV anime was unpopular as well. People always like to try and claim that it was because it was too close to the manga, but if the series anime was still successful that wouldn't matter. One Piece and Naruto each have/had close gaps between the anime and the manga but they still continued on, just treated with padded as fuck pacing and/or massive amounts of filler. People like to ignore the fact that Bleach had laughably bad TV ratings at the end of its run. It's pretty clear that the OP of the post isn't talking how Bleach isn't popular or that it is doing horrible but that it isn't as big as some people claim it to be, which is true. All in all it's a pretty informative read, tnx for posting it. Not sure if serious. Even my gfs boyfriend who only knows what DBZ and Pokemon is knows what Bleach is. Saying bleach isn't popular is dumb. |
. |
Aug 20, 2016 4:21 AM
#8
sumusiko said: BigBoss said: Some pretty interesting comments in there as well. I also would like to add that Bleach isn't unpopular because SJ don't promote it, it's because bleach is unpopular that SJ don't promote it. There's a reason why it's constantly in the bottom rankings week in week out Its TV anime was unpopular as well. People always like to try and claim that it was because it was too close to the manga, but if the series anime was still successful that wouldn't matter. One Piece and Naruto each have/had close gaps between the anime and the manga but they still continued on, just treated with padded as fuck pacing and/or massive amounts of filler. People like to ignore the fact that Bleach had laughably bad TV ratings at the end of its run. It's pretty clear that the OP of the post isn't talking how Bleach isn't popular or that it is doing horrible but that it isn't as big as some people claim it to be, which is true. All in all it's a pretty informative read, tnx for posting it. Not sure if serious. Even my gfs boyfriend who only knows what DBZ and Pokemon is knows what Bleach is. Saying bleach isn't popular is dumb. Never said it fam, reread it again. |
Aug 20, 2016 4:29 AM
#9
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_manga Bleach is at number 17 with 82 million copies of manga sold,you wouldn't call that popular? |
Aug 20, 2016 4:32 AM
#10
Bleach was popular but now it is not which means no really talk about it anymore just like how people stop talking about One Punch Man even though they were going crazy about everywhere. I think Bleach being popular is more west thing since there are looooot more things that are more popular in Japan. |
Kaiser-chanAug 20, 2016 4:35 AM
Aug 20, 2016 4:34 AM
#11
RoyTF said: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_manga Bleach is at number 17 with 82 million copies of manga sold,you wouldn't call that popular? I kinda have a feeling that most ppl don't even bother with reading what was posted... The author of the post clearly says that he doesn't think Bleach isn't popular but that it isn't as BIG as some ppl claim it to be... and he states the reason why in his post which is pretty informative. |
Aug 20, 2016 9:27 AM
#12
Really tho, there are a lot of occasion when insiders talk about Shonen Jump ranking and most of them already said it's not supposed to be taken too seriously. Based Eiichiro Oda said: Oda himself adressed this issue in a SBS of volume 47 (translation by viz) D(reader): Oda! My older brohter ells me that the comics in Jump magazine run in the order of their popularity. Is that true?! (by Yasumo) O(Oda): That's a good question from a Jump reader. I get these questions quite often actually that's not exactly how it works: The Jump publication's debuty editor-in-chief chosses the order every week... But of course, the popular ones do have a tendency to run in the front. That vice editor-on-chief promotes certain comics on certain weeks depending on the mood. To be spedific, the order is inteded to "maximize the enjoyment of the reading public". But it's up to you to read in whatever order you want. It's just another marketing tactic by Jump in order to push a certain series. If anything, it's only proves just how popular Bleach is because despite the low ranking it has, meaning that it is not favored by the editorial management, it still manage to sells so well even better than most of their line-up. |
Aug 20, 2016 9:36 AM
#13
Good grief. Showing a chart and all of a sudden you can twist any opinion. I also like how they didn't present any new data, but hey it's in a chart. And the phrase is dumb and inaccurate as shit. Bleach is not as popular it used to be, but the title implies it was never majorly popular to being with, which is false. Cancer. |
Aug 20, 2016 12:17 PM
#14
BigBoss said: I also would like to add that Bleach isn't unpopular because SJ don't promote it, it's because bleach is unpopular that SJ don't promote it. There's a reason why it's constantly in the bottom rankings week in week out Its TV anime was unpopular as well. People always like to try and claim that it was because it was too close to the manga, but if the series anime was still successful that wouldn't matter. One Piece and Naruto each have/had close gaps between the anime and the manga but they still continued on, just treated with padded as fuck pacing and/or massive amounts of filler. People like to ignore the fact that Bleach had laughably bad TV ratings at the end of its run. 1. bleach was doing good in the magazine until they stopped advertising it for 4 years which includes the years it had good rankings. 2. TV Toko's producer said bleach was their best rated show. |
Aug 20, 2016 12:59 PM
#15
ichii_1 said: BigBoss said: I also would like to add that Bleach isn't unpopular because SJ don't promote it, it's because bleach is unpopular that SJ don't promote it. There's a reason why it's constantly in the bottom rankings week in week out Its TV anime was unpopular as well. People always like to try and claim that it was because it was too close to the manga, but if the series anime was still successful that wouldn't matter. One Piece and Naruto each have/had close gaps between the anime and the manga but they still continued on, just treated with padded as fuck pacing and/or massive amounts of filler. People like to ignore the fact that Bleach had laughably bad TV ratings at the end of its run. 1. bleach was doing good in the magazine until they stopped advertising it for 4 years which includes the years it had good rankings. 2. TV Toko's producer said bleach was their best rated show. 1. Maybe they stopped advertising it because the sales started to drop? 2. That's not really true tho, to link an in depth look at anime ratings. Bleach premiered in Fall 2004 and garnered about 4-6 ratings. http://www.geocities.jp/animesityouritu/2004b.html It held that level until about 2008, when it begun to gradually decline to about 3-4. By 2011, it was basically 1-2, with some episodes garnering less than 1 rating point. That's basically the same as what some overnight anime were garnering, and overnight anime are generally subsidised by anime studios (i.e. they are used as ads to sell the anime and merchandising, rather than to make the TV station money) In 2012, it finally ended. http://www.geocities.jp/animesityouritu/2012a.html The last episodes of bleach (Fullbring arc) had ratings of: 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.6 1.6 2.2 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.4 (終) It was replaced in the same timeslot with Rock Lee's Springtime of Youth SD, which got essentially the same (maybe slightly better) ratings. (新) 2.3 1.4 1.8 1.3 1.2 1.7 2.3 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.9 2.0 Basically, by the end, Bleach was getting the same ratings as Rock Lee. Which of course ended within a year. |
Aug 20, 2016 1:12 PM
#16
BigBoss said: 1. Maybe they stopped advertising it because the sales started to drop? 2. That's not really true tho, to link an in depth look at anime ratings. Bleach premiered in Fall 2004 and garnered about 4-6 ratings. http://www.geocities.jp/animesityouritu/2004b.html It held that level until about 2008, when it begun to gradually decline to about 3-4. By 2011, it was basically 1-2, with some episodes garnering less than 1 rating point. That's basically the same as what some overnight anime were garnering, and overnight anime are generally subsidised by anime studios (i.e. they are used as ads to sell the anime and merchandising, rather than to make the TV station money) In 2012, it finally ended. http://www.geocities.jp/animesityouritu/2012a.html The last episodes of bleach (Fullbring arc) had ratings of: 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.6 1.6 2.2 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.4 (終) It was replaced in the same timeslot with Rock Lee's Springtime of Youth SD, which got essentially the same (maybe slightly better) ratings. (新) 2.3 1.4 1.8 1.3 1.2 1.7 2.3 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.9 2.0 Basically, by the end, Bleach was getting the same ratings as Rock Lee. Which of course ended within a year. 1. hinomaru zumou which only sells 30K gets more ads than bleach. 2. the producer said so and you're overrating the rankings, even naruto, precure and pokemon get around 1 to 2% ratings these days and they haven't been cancelled. Shuiesha ended bleach for no good reason, must be legal issues. |
Aug 20, 2016 1:30 PM
#17
ichii_1 said: BigBoss said: 1. Maybe they stopped advertising it because the sales started to drop? 2. That's not really true tho, to link an in depth look at anime ratings. Bleach premiered in Fall 2004 and garnered about 4-6 ratings. http://www.geocities.jp/animesityouritu/2004b.html It held that level until about 2008, when it begun to gradually decline to about 3-4. By 2011, it was basically 1-2, with some episodes garnering less than 1 rating point. That's basically the same as what some overnight anime were garnering, and overnight anime are generally subsidised by anime studios (i.e. they are used as ads to sell the anime and merchandising, rather than to make the TV station money) In 2012, it finally ended. http://www.geocities.jp/animesityouritu/2012a.html The last episodes of bleach (Fullbring arc) had ratings of: 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.6 1.6 2.2 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.4 (終) It was replaced in the same timeslot with Rock Lee's Springtime of Youth SD, which got essentially the same (maybe slightly better) ratings. (新) 2.3 1.4 1.8 1.3 1.2 1.7 2.3 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.9 2.0 Basically, by the end, Bleach was getting the same ratings as Rock Lee. Which of course ended within a year. 1. hinomaru zumou which only sells 30K gets more ads than bleach. 2. the producer said so and you're overrating the rankings, even naruto, precure and pokemon get around 1 to 2% ratings these days and they haven't been cancelled. Shuiesha ended bleach for no good reason, must be legal issues. 1. The series is not that old, what maybe 2 years now? and is really consistent with the rankings, I'm not surprised it's beeing pushed by Jump to try boost up the sales. 2. Don't those 3 shows have huge merchandise lines? don't know much about Precure but Pokemon shouldn't even be worth mentioning, if Pokemon dropped to 0 ratings it would still not be canceled as it's a massive franchise and the anime is there to basically promote the game and all it's merchandise and Naruto is huge as well. Could you link me a source for what you claim the producer said? |
Aug 20, 2016 1:52 PM
#18
BigBoss said: 1. The series is not that old, what maybe 2 years now? and is really consistent with the rankings, I'm not surprised it's beeing pushed by Jump to try boost up the sales. 2. Don't those 3 shows have huge merchandise lines? don't know much about Precure but Pokemon shouldn't even be worth mentioning, if Pokemon dropped to 0 ratings it would still not be canceled as it's a massive franchise and the anime is there to basically promote the game and all it's merchandise and Naruto is huge as well. Could you link me a source for what you claim the producer said? 1. doesn't matter if it's old, thepoint is volume sales don't matter much and the magazine rankings are important but bleach got less ads while it still had good and decent rankings. 2. TV Tokyo overseas department producer. https://s31.postimg.org/58btoc3pn/M8_To_DS.png Bonus) Bleach Anime Sales: Merchandise (charabiz 2010-2012): Billion Yen/Million Dollars 2010: 19.4 / 162.7 2011: 16.1 / 135.1 2012: 15.3 /128.4 Sold more than yugoih even 1 year after the anime ended (it includes japan). http://www.crunchyroll.com/anime-news/2013/06/03-1/overseas-sales-help-maker-naruto-tv-tokyos-top-earner-for-2013 |
ichii_1Aug 20, 2016 3:43 PM
Aug 20, 2016 2:13 PM
#19
@ichii_1 1. Bleach was promoted the same way when it started out, no? I'm not really buying that there is some deep conspiracy where Jump is sabotaging Bleach by cuting off the advertisement as it seems silly for buisness, if it could make them even more money it seems pretty stupid for them to basically go and "kill it" so to say. 2. I mean if you wanna take this guys tweet as a fact over actual TV ratings, ok I guess? |
BigBossAug 20, 2016 2:48 PM
Aug 20, 2016 2:59 PM
#20
Don't care bleach will be always popular in my heart |
Aug 20, 2016 3:48 PM
#21
Aug 20, 2016 10:05 PM
#22
ichii_1 said: 1. doesn't matter if it's old, thepoint is volume sales don't matter much and the magazine rankings are important but bleach got less ads while it still had good and decent rankings. you know im a fan of Bleach manga too but to say the ranking of Bleach is always decent is false look at this chart if you want the source of the chart data then you can find it here on the video description https://youtu.be/ACq7tgjHdGA |
Aug 20, 2016 11:24 PM
#23
j0x said: you know im a fan of Bleach manga too but to say the ranking of Bleach is always decent is false 9 is still okay and that graph makes it look worse than it is, since the drop is because the fullbring arc averaged a 7 or so right after the 3 of the arrancar arc. 2 years after the anime ended is when it started to go into bad rankings. |
Aug 20, 2016 11:34 PM
#24
Bleach was popular but not that popular of worthy calling it BIG THREE along with one piece and naruto. |
Aug 21, 2016 3:58 AM
#25
No matter how popular it is/was, it's still a piece of garbage. |
Aug 21, 2016 4:19 AM
#26
Bleach was once very popular = almost on same level as Naruto's popularity back then, hence it belong to what people called the "big 3" But after the HM arc. The story started to go downhill, Ichigo keep transforming. He was a human at first, then became half human and Shinigami, next he became hollow, next arc he is different again. Just what is he really? That's how Bleach lose it's popularity. It was good at first but half got ruined. I wouldn't call it piece of garbage t though. People who call something they once enjoy, they once got hooked to, a garbage are big piece of sh!t. That's stupid, if you didn't liked it from the beginning that will make sense. But if you enjoyed it once then call it garbage later (especially just because of shipping) then, you're nothing but a hypocrite piece of shit. |
subarashiniAug 21, 2016 4:57 AM
Aug 21, 2016 4:44 AM
#27
You're misunderstanding things. 3 million sales a year is still hugely popular and certainly more popular than many other Jump series. Saying Bleach wasn't incredibly popular throughout it's entire run would be a lie. |
Aug 21, 2016 6:23 AM
#28
CondemneDio said: No matter how popular it is/was, it's still a piece of garbage. lol more popular it means that show is good, something bad can't be popular . |
Aug 21, 2016 6:34 AM
#29
AllenVonStein said: CondemneDio said: No matter how popular it is/was, it's still a piece of garbage. lol more popular it means that show is good, something bad can't be popular . While I do think that it's all subjective but ofc it can. Obligatory "Justin Bieber is popular but bad" and "Twilight is popular but bad" are really good examples. |
BigBossAug 21, 2016 6:51 AM
Aug 21, 2016 9:57 AM
#30
Inori_is_love said: You're misunderstanding things. 3 million sales a year is still hugely popular and certainly more popular than many other Jump series. Saying Bleach wasn't incredibly popular throughout it's entire run would be a lie. People don't understand how thing really work. In a business hard is finding clients, in this case readers, after finding faithful clients is turns really hard to loose them. And how much faithful they are harder it is for them to go away. What does that mean for Bleach? Its franchise state isn't just described by the number of sales, but where it was and where its going. Are its faithful readers leaving, are they staying, is it getting new faithful readers, is it coming from a boost in popularity where most readers weren't faithful ones, is declining, ...? A little example, a series that sold 100k and went to 300k and the tendency is to increase, is different than a series that sold 1 Million and now its selling 300k and the tendency is to decrease. The study of the series is what is more important. And is a complex thing, not something simple as just looking at the numbers. Is true that Bleach lastest volumes are averaging 525k in 1 year and a print of 660k, that is indeed really good. If things were just that it would be great, but unfortunately there is a lot more story to that. 660k print and 525k average sales is not the series peak, nor the stable point. That is the problem! The series at a given point was able to peak at a print of 1.33 Millions, and it stabled for around 17 volumes(around 3-3.5 years), and when Oricon started releasing sales data selling around 800k close to 900k per volume. And the series tendency though is got more stable later, was to keep decreasing. Basically Bleach was showing that was a series that its heyday was long gone and right now is in the degenerative phase. Also as a franchise it was the same thing. If it was only in terms of volume, maybe it could be dealt with, but in the Anime the producers(Studio Pierrot and TV Tokyo) decided that it was better to earn the franchise money without producing anything new for it, in Merchandise it decreased to a point where it got away of the top 100 character Merchandise, in the Magazine went to the last positions of it. So obviously the series wasn't/isn't doing great, but just surviving of its past glory. |
Aug 21, 2016 10:17 AM
#31
RoyTF said: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_manga Bleach is at number 17 with 82 million copies of manga sold,you wouldn't call that popular? i think the problem is it's not as successful it once was-- it's declined, and as it's seen by foreign viewers - because it's one of the three most popular anime worldwide but no so much in Japan(anymore). |
ゴロゴロゴロ ゴロゴロゴロ ゴロゴロゴロ ゴロゴロゴロ ゴゴゴゴゴゴ ゴゴゴゴゴゴ ゴゴゴゴゴゴ |
Aug 21, 2016 10:47 AM
#32
AllenVonStein said: CondemneDio said: No matter how popular it is/was, it's still a piece of garbage. lol more popular it means that show is good, something bad can't be popular . Nazism was popular way back in Germany too. A lot of stupid crap is popular just because someone started liking it. Humans are illogical. Accessability is also a big factor. |
Aug 21, 2016 10:49 AM
#33
bigivelfhq said: Basically Bleach was showing that was a series that its heyday was long gone and right now is in the degenerative phase. the Anime the producers(Studio Pierrot and TV Tokyo) decided that it was better to earn the franchise money without producing anything new for it. Bleach has been gaining new readers thanks to the mobile game which has over 14 million downloads. Backlog sales. 2011 - 738,599 2012 - 336,989 2013 - 243,402 2014 - 192,019 2015 - 333,737 2016 - (will be higher) Doubt it, it still earned tons of money, there were other reasons for ending it. |
Aug 22, 2016 11:21 AM
#34
Yes it was always lagging behind the other big guns like One Piece and Naruto, but it appears it enjoys more popularity in the US. |
"Let Justice Be Done!" My Theme Fight again, fight again for justice! |
Aug 22, 2016 4:08 PM
#35
It's almost as if people are incapable of reading or something. Bleach IS popular. It's just not nearly at the same level as Naruto, let alone One Piece. |
Aug 23, 2016 1:20 PM
#36
j0x said: if you want the source of the chart data then you can find it here on the video description https://youtu.be/ACq7tgjHdGA This a great video, the guy managed to cover all the problems of Bleach had from objective (in worst case semi-objective) standpoint. This should be more promoted |
Aug 23, 2016 4:41 PM
#37
Comedian said: j0x said: if you want the source of the chart data then you can find it here on the video description https://youtu.be/ACq7tgjHdGA This a great video, the guy managed to cover all the problems of Bleach had from objective (in worst case semi-objective) standpoint. This should be more promoted That is such a great video. Made me feel a little bit sad for Kubo. Jump should just really let their mangaka to what they want in their work, end it when they want, if it doesn't sell well then at least give a time limit for the mangaka to end his manga but not that short |
Nov 5, 2021 7:05 AM
#38
I'm reading this thread in 2021 and wow I really feel bad for y'all, especially the ones that thought Super Eyepatch Wolf's video was great and legit in any shape or form lmao He even deleted it and made another one after 4 years, which is still one big bullshit and got debunked plenty of times by people that have actually watched/read Bleach with opened eyes. |
Nov 7, 2021 2:37 PM
#39
CondemneDio said: you have Mirai Nikki in your favorites your opinion is shit and irrelevant.No matter how popular it is/was, it's still a piece of garbage. Anyways many people are misunderstanding that OP isn’t calling Bleach not popular it’s just not as popular make it to be but it was indeed one the most popular manga in the 2000s not as popular as One Piece or Naruto but it was popular enough to be in the Big 3 and that’s facts. |
Nov 7, 2021 4:11 PM
#40
LeonardoWatch00 said: CondemneDio said: you have Mirai Nikki in your favorites your opinion is shit and irrelevant.No matter how popular it is/was, it's still a piece of garbage. Anyways many people are misunderstanding that OP isn’t calling Bleach not popular it’s just not as popular make it to be but it was indeed one the most popular manga in the 2000s not as popular as One Piece or Naruto but it was popular enough to be in the Big 3 and that’s facts. Did you have anything of interest to say? |
More topics from this board
Poll: » Bleach Chapter 172 Discussionrebwaters - Dec 21, 2009 |
5 |
by L1on777
»»
5 minutes ago |
|
Poll: » Bleach Chapter -17 Discussionrebwaters - Nov 21, 2009 |
2 |
by L1on777
»»
8 hours ago |
|
Poll: » Bleach Chapter 170 Discussionrebwaters - Dec 21, 2009 |
5 |
by L1on777
»»
8 hours ago |
|
Poll: » Bleach Chapter 169 Discussionrebwaters - Dec 21, 2009 |
8 |
by L1on777
»»
9 hours ago |
|
Poll: » Bleach Chapter 168 Discussionrebwaters - Dec 21, 2009 |
4 |
by L1on777
»»
9 hours ago |