New
What did you think of this episode?
DO NOT discuss the source material beyond this episode. If you want to discuss future events or theories, please use separate threads.
DO NOT ask where to watch/download this episode or give links to copyrighted, non-fair use material.
DO NOT troll/bait/harass/abuse other users for liking or disliking the series/characters.
DO read the Anime Discussion Rules and Site & Forum Guidelines.
DO NOT ask where to watch/download this episode or give links to copyrighted, non-fair use material.
DO NOT troll/bait/harass/abuse other users for liking or disliking the series/characters.
DO read the Anime Discussion Rules and Site & Forum Guidelines.
Jan 9, 2013 9:08 AM
#101
ah! i see, thanks for clearing that up :) might have to watch it again now |
Jan 16, 2013 7:57 PM
#102
Well, I have to say that the visuals were nice along with the music. The psyche, the soul, and the physical body makes up the three human traits. That's fucking deep. 7/10 |
Jan 22, 2013 9:12 AM
#103
Jan 22, 2013 11:00 AM
#104
Shiki was so deep I couldn't even see her at the end. |
May 11, 2013 6:42 AM
#106
arkv said: This is the worst thing ever made. You do realize that this is just an epilogue and not a full-blown movie entry to the series right? Of course, because some relaxed metaphysical and philosophical exposition upon the whole story is totally the worst thing this series has done (disregarding the fact that this very element of introspection is practically half of what made the series so good and refreshing in the first place). |
May 12, 2013 3:54 AM
#107
Forgetfulness said: Meh, after reading through the forums it feels like Kara no Kyoukai was 2deep4me and I never really understood it. Does the novel explain it better? Cause I'm planning on reading that sometime Uh, if you thought that the movies were 2deep4you, you might not enjoy the novel since it heavily explores the metaphysical and philosophical parts a lot more than the movies do (I personally enjoy it, but it's definitely not something that everyone would enjoy). |
ronriMay 12, 2013 4:08 AM
May 12, 2013 9:23 PM
#108
Forgetfulness said: ronri said: Forgetfulness said: Meh, after reading through the forums it feels like Kara no Kyoukai was 2deep4me and I never really understood it. Does the novel explain it better? Cause I'm planning on reading that sometime Uh, if you thought that the movies were 2deep4you, you might not enjoy the novel since it heavily explores the metaphysical and philosophical parts a lot more than the movies do (I personally enjoy it, but it's definitely not something that everyone would enjoy). Ah, okay. Does it explain some stuff or do you have to infer it? Either way, I'll probably read it eventually(After I get through F/SN VN and F/Z LN lol) It explains stuff in great detail so I wouldn't necessarily say that you'd easily get lost or anything. Rather it does delve into actual religious and philosophical concepts and certain terminology that you may need to look up on Wiki if you're not well-acquainted with them. |
May 25, 2013 11:57 PM
#109
Visuals, atmosphere, and Shiki's voice get easy 10s. Beyond that, this just didn't seem necessary as an addition to KnK. What I think it served well as was as an info expansion, almost like a soothing encyclopedic rundown of the mains and wandering discourse on the nature of a person. Not needed, but a nice piece for those interested in this way of presenting the subject matter. There was just so little new material...could've been shortened to 10 minutes of personality exploration, total. |
Jun 2, 2013 10:43 PM
#110
Having actually read most of the posts in this thread, I have come to realise, I'm surrounded by fucking ediots. That is all. |
Jun 6, 2013 1:06 AM
#111
SlothieSloth said: Having actually read most of the posts in this thread, I have come to realise, I'm surrounded by fucking ediots. That is all. Welcome to MAL, where 3 of the top 6 anime are Gintama... The other 3 being FMA, Steins;Gate and Clannad. -.- On a more serious note though, it all comes down to taste. I love the KnK series to death and re-watch it often. However, a friend of mine with similar tastes in anime just can't stand it. Our overall compatibility is very high, but when it comes to KnK, we just can't see eye-to-eye. It's definitely an acquired taste, and even then, only meant for certain people. That's fine though, because I'd rather have an anime that I feel is built for me (and others like me) than something mainstream and generic. |
Jun 16, 2013 2:55 AM
#112
Thank you so much, lasercannon, for your excellent explanation. After reading that, I was actually pretty pissed off (not because of what you said). I just recently (over the past week) watched all seven movies plus the epilogue. While I now understand more clearly what was said in the epilogue and how it relates to the rest of the movies, it still feels disconnected from them. I think that's because they didn't represent all of the metaphysical/philosophical stuff very well throughout the movies, like you said. It was just a line here and there, and while those lines did have importance in their respective parts of the story, most of them didn't give the impression of being indicative of something as deep and relevant to the whole story as what they actually apparently were (the ones that did were about Shiki's dual personality). In short, the reason I'm pissed is because I feel incredibly jipped. I mean, here they have some really intricate concepts that are important to the story, and would have added a very intriguing layer to the story as presented in the movies, yet they seem to do a shoddy job of integrating them into the movies. It makes me want to find out if the novels have been printed in English, so I can read those. Given all of this, I think a more satisfying ending to the movies would have been to just end it after the seventh one. Having all of this other stuff brought in after the fact in the epilogue, when it wasn't presented well in the previous movies to begin with just made the epilogue seem disconnected. In hindsight, I really wish they had made the movies longer so they could have better included these important concepts in a way that would make more sense and convey their relevance to the story. I dunno.... After watching the seventh movie, I was feeling really happy, enjoying seeing Shiki and Mikiya together and happy after all they went through. And then after the epilogue, I felt slightly confused at first, because some of the things that were said didn't feel like they fit or were necessary. And then I find out that the reason those things felt like they came out of nowhere was because they were represented poorly in the other movies and, thus, kinda did come out of nowhere. And I just feel really disappointed. But I really did enjoy the series. I guess it almost feels like a stab in the back because it all comes right at the end, on top of which I learn that I should really read the novels to get the most out of it anyways. It's incredibly disappointing, but I like it way too much to just throw up my hands and say "f*ck it". I suppose in the worst case, if it continues to bother me, the next time I watch it I can just watch the seven movies and ignore the epilogue, like I do with Darker Than Black, ignoring the OVAs and second season. But in this case it would feel like I'm missing out on something. Eh, I dunno. Man, this sucks. |
Jun 16, 2013 5:33 AM
#113
@Sejin - The concept of the Mystic Eyes and its connection to the Origin; the exploration of physical bodies and vessels; the very nature of magic in this series; the whole notion of Taijitu in relation to reality; Lio's transformation being attributed to reincarnation; and the whole internal conflict of Shiki/Lio in terms of free will vs. destiny. With all those things considered, I personally thought that they hinted enough philosophical and metaphysical aspects. I felt like the movies did a good enough job integrating such elements so as to not make the Epilogue that jarring. Movie 5 was already heavily bordering on this level of exposition that I honestly felt like adding too much into all the movies would've hit the audience in the face and removed all forms of subtlety. The fact that the Epilogue had to relate such concepts with everyday notions (a computer, the ocean, etc.) just shows how much cushioning they did to make it appropriate enough without going overboard with the metaphysical nature of the series. I dunno about you, but I felt like the Epilogue rounded out the series in a more thoughtful, albeit less conventional way, something that I personally consider as a huge plus. |
ronriJun 16, 2013 5:41 AM
Jun 16, 2013 1:04 PM
#114
ronri, I got some of that watching the series (how the Mystic Eyes connect to the Origin, how the taiji relates to Shiki's personality, at least (I think?), Lio's transformation, and free will vs. destiny). I completely missed the nature of magic one. Even now, thinking back, I can't recall where they talked about that. I do remember them talking about how the ultimate goal of a magus is to get to the akashic records. The one that I'm having the hardest time wrapping my mind around is the exploration of physical bodies and vessels, and how that relates to and explains Shiki's personalities. Was that the part where they talked about the body having its own personality, separate from the personality derived from the mind? It could be that, since that concept was so heavily focused on in the epilogue, and I didn't catch it at all before that, that it contributed to the epilogue feeling like it came out of nowhere for me. What I have been able to piece together about the physical bodies and vessels part and how it relates to Shiki's personalities (but, I have no idea if it's accurate or not; maybe you can help with that) is that the body's personality is pretty much what you have when you're very young, before you realize that you have a self that's distinct from everyone else. <i>Shiki</i> (that's supposed to be the italicized one; I don't know how to do that on here) is that distinct self, but because she originated in a body that's origin is emptiness, she turned inward and didn't want to interact with, or even perceive, the outside world (that part was stated pretty clearly in the epilogue). But, a physical body can't survive like that, so (either intentionally or not; I'm not sure about this) Shiki and SHIKI were created as other, opposite personalities inside her mind. It's pretty much like in taiji theory: you have the progression from wuji to taiji to yin and yang to taiji to wuji and back and forth like that over and over ad infinitum. The part that made that more confusing to me, however, was when they talked about her family's role in it, how they were able to manipulate that original body personality or something (I couldn't make sense of that). And then, I've read on Wikipedia that it was something to do with the dual personality of Shiki/SHIKI and her upbringing as a demon hunter (they don't even mention this in the movies; if they did, I completely missed it) that led to Shiki's withdrawal from people. But, I can't quite figure out how that fits in with what was said about <i>Shiki</i> and the body's personality. I'm not sure if I understand correctly: Did <i>Shiki<i/> come from the body's personality? Is she that personality? Or is she Shiki's initial self? Did both Shiki AND SHIKI come from <i>Shiki</i>? Did Shiki come from <i>Shiki</i>, and then SHIKI come from Shiki? I don't quite follow how that progressed, let alone why it progressed like that. The fifth movie really threw me for a loop. It seemed so back and forth throughout that I was kinda lost for most of it. It was only after the fact, when I read a plot summary of it on Wikipedia to try to make sense of it, and realized that it was supposed to be two arcs playing out side by side in time, followed by a final arc that concluded the movie, that it made much sense. So I probably missed a lot from that movie in particular, and I know that's one where, like you said, they talk rather heavily about a lot of the concepts in the series. With so much talked about and explained in the epilogue, it's a lot to process and connect with the other movies to make full sense of it all. It's funny, I don't feel so bent out of shape about the epilogue as I did when I first posted, which was around 5 or 6 in the morning. I guess that's what sleep can do for you. Thanks for stating clearly the concepts and ideas presented in the series. That alone helps a lot in focusing my thoughts and piecing things together. And, hopefully, maybe you'll be able to help me understand some of the things I'm having a harder time wrapping my mind around. |
SejinJun 16, 2013 1:14 PM
Jun 16, 2013 7:04 PM
#115
@Sejin It was heavily inferred that the nature of magic in KNK (at least in the sense of how Araya, Touko and Cornelius delved into it), was more along the lines of tampering with the flow of reality. If I recall correctly, the most notable movies that slowly led up to the Epilogue were....Movie 1, Movie 2, Movie 4, Movie 5, and Movie 7. They all contributed various ideas that played on this idea of an individual's personality and how it all come into play with their body's (or rather their vessel's) natural impulses. Just so we're on the same boat here I'll lay out most of it so we can easily reference it (I'll put it in spoiler tags due to its length): - Movie 1 starts off with the very notion that bodies are merely containers for the human soul, playing with the idea that Shiki resembled a doll (not explained in the movies, but Shiki's name is actually derived from shikigami) - Movie 2 explained the nature of Ryougi Shiki's personalities (Shiki and SHIKI) and their internal conflict, as well as Shiki's disciplined family customs as the next "heir" to the age-old Ryougi dynasty. The Ryougi family is described as being a Demon Hunter clan in the novels, though I'd argue that the term "Demon Hunter" isn't really that significant, rather it's the consequence of their family's "specialty" that's really important here (I'll elaborate later). - Movie 4 extended the idea of the vessel from Movie 1, wherein the body is literally like vessel, that can house an individual's personality. And though it may seem irrelevant, the Mystic Eyes of Death Perception is actually a crucial point in this story as it hints that Shiki was able to perceive the origin within every single object through her near-death experience (hence her ability to reduce everything back to "nothing" thereby literally killing them). By being stuck in a limbo-like state, she was able to gaze upon the Origin during her coma, thus allowing her to comprehend a secondary level of perception around her. This in turn, translates into her power to be able to kill everything (this later gets tied up in the Epilogue). - Movie 5 is where it gets really into it. Shiki's body is described as a key to the Origin because she literally possesses the Mystic Eyes of Death Perception. Araya claims that because of this, Shiki possesses the closest connection to the Origin as her origin is literally the closest in its complete and absolute form (a void, a literal nothingness). Adding on to that, Shiki's Mystic Eyes are heavily tied to that, it was enough reason for Araya to use her as a focal point in his plans. Besides this, many hints of duality regarding Shiki and SHIKI are thrown across the movie, literally relating it to the concept of Yin and Yang. This seems random at first actually, and while it's mainly used to highlight Shiki's various gender mannerisms along with other characters (Tomoe and Mikiya's mentality in particular), it's also used to continue the motif of duality that was prevalent in this film. - Movie 7 is where a lot of the metaphysical aspects take a backseat as it relies on a more emotionally-driven story (which I do prefer as the last film in the series). That said, it heavily emphasized the idea that Shiki truly internalized her role as a killer, thus creating an internal conflict in her mind when it was revealed that she was innocent all along. In Movie 2 it was inferred that she had a natural impulse and preference for murder, but beyond that it's never given a reason beyond the fact that she's insane (well by normal standards, she IS insane). While Lio's origin of Consumption takes center stage, we never really understand what ties Shiki's murderous impulse with the rest of the series beyond what was already mentioned. One little clue though: Lio inferred that her murderous impulse is derived from her Mystic Eyes (something he probably heard from Araya). Now that all of that has been accounted for, let's have a look at what you said: Sejin said: What I have been able to piece together about the physical bodies and vessels part and how it relates to Shiki's personalities (but, I have no idea if it's accurate or not; maybe you can help with that) is that the body's personality is pretty much what you have when you're very young, before you realize that you have a self that's distinct from everyone else. <i>Shiki</i> (that's supposed to be the italicized one; I don't know how to do that on here) is that distinct self, but because she originated in a body that's origin is emptiness, she turned inward and didn't want to interact with, or even perceive, the outside world (that part was stated pretty clearly in the epilogue). But, a physical body can't survive like that, so (either intentionally or not; I'm not sure about this) Shiki and SHIKI were created as other, opposite personalities inside her mind. It's pretty much like in taiji theory: you have the progression from wuji to taiji to yin and yang to taiji to wuji and back and forth like that over and over ad infinitum. You mostly got it spot-on, actually (especially the relation to the Taiji theory). There's one little thing you sort of misinterpreted, and that's the body's personality, but this connects to something else which I'll answer after the next bit--- Sejin said: The part that made that more confusing to me, however, was when they talked about her family's role in it, how they were able to manipulate that original body personality or something (I couldn't make sense of that). And then, I've read on Wikipedia that it was something to do with the dual personality of Shiki/SHIKI and her upbringing as a demon hunter (they don't even mention this in the movies; if they did, I completely missed it) that led to Shiki's withdrawal from people. But, I can't quite figure out how that fits in with what was said about <i>Shiki</i> and the body's personality. All of the main points that I'll mention in the following are actually from the movie (which in terms of the Epilogue, was actually very very close to the novel where the Epilogue barely leaves out any details). So let's start with the big reveal: Shiki's origin is finally elaborated upon as the origin of "Nothingness". The reason why her Mystic Eyes were so powerful and why she had such a strong innate connection in the first place, was because she was literally born with the origin of Nothingness; the closest connection to the void-like nature of the Origin itself. Her murderous impulse is described as a complete longing for nothingness, the ceasing of existence itself (similar to Lio's desire to consume everything around him, although his was treated in a more feral and gluttonous way). This is why, despite Shiki's insistence that it was the personality SHIKI's fault for manifesting such an urge, Ryougi Shiki as a whole (both personalities) will always have a preference for murder, since her body is literally born that way. Unfortunately for her, the Epilogue basically explains that anyone with the origin of Nothingness are destined to die of stillbirth. By literally being born with such a close connection to the Origin, any individual will always lean close to death and thus should never manifest as a live human being. So then why is Shiki, you know, alive? This is how it ties up with the Ryougi family. The Ryougi dynasty's expertise lies in their inherited ability and knowledge of manifesting multiple personalities in one person's body in order to maximize a person's metal and physical capacity. This ties in with the notion that the very nature of how the Ryougi family treated their heir is more akin to that of a glorified shikigami. This is a custom of theirs, as they try to keep their traditions and bloodline alive of course. Through the Ryougi's knowledge of the supernatural, they unknowingly kept Shiki alive by actually implementing their family custom of infusing multiple personalities within Shiki's body. Their forced use of magic prevented the baby from dying of stillbirth, literally allowing a person with the origin of Nothingness to actually come to life. From there on, the body developed two personalities (as you had described): Shiki and SHIKI. Continuing the theme that Shiki is an unwilling shikigami of the family (at least in terms of how she views herself in wanting a normal life), there's a bit of irony in that what brought Shiki to life is the very thing that she actually wanted to steer away from. But then what IS the third personality? What IS the body's personality? I'll answer that after the following: Sejin said: I'm not sure if I understand correctly: Did <i>Shiki<i/> come from the body's personality? Is she that personality? Or is she Shiki's initial self? Did both Shiki AND SHIKI come from <i>Shiki</i>? Did Shiki come from <i>Shiki</i>, and then SHIKI come from Shiki? I don't quite follow how that progressed, let alone why it progressed like that. Normally the body is meant to naturally allow the personality to manifest through the mind, but because of how Shiki's body was geared to die right from the start, her infusion with an actual personality from an outside source sort of counteracted that. You already got it right in terms of how her two personalities came to form (one is apprehensive, while the other is destructive). As for the third personality this is where it gets really metaphysical... In the Epilogue it was mentioned that a life begins by being connected to the Origin until the connection is severed at birth. Even if somehow a life remained connected to it through its respective origin, the body itself (or rather it's connection to the will of the Origin) should not become self-aware so as to allow the mind to manifest its own intelligence. BUT because of how the Ryougi family's special trait allowed it to survive, it also survived with its sentience and connection intact. What makes it so notable is the fact that her inherent connection through the origin of Nothingness actually allowed the Origin's will to manifest the way it did by being forced to come to life. In essence, Shiki's third personality is the very will of the Origin in physical and live form. This creates a strange sense of "destiny", as everything fell into place just to have something so unique to actually come to fruition. But this is the main selling point about the Epilogue for me: how it all ties back to the story with Shiki and Mikiya. Despite what was essentially a mix of disastrous elements that could've driven Shiki to a horrible death (Ryougi family upbringing, Mystic Eyes with a preference for murder etc.), such an outcome was greatly averted by the very nature of her two personalities coming into play and wanting a normal. In addition, the third personality applauds Mikiya's actions for being able to guide Shiki into actually living a perfectly functional life, attributing it to the fact that Mikiya's very own origin relates to being innately accepting of others no matter how hard it may be for him. In the end, what I enjoyed about the Epilogue is not simply the metaphysical aspects (though it certainly gave it a more interesting and philosophical outlook), but how it relates back to the notion of destiny vs. free will in relation to Shiki and Mikiya and how it was used as a vehicle to highlight their character arc even further. What's interesting is that there was never a definitive answer in the end as to which one was "better", as both elements influenced each other to allow the two to live their lives the way they did. From that, I personally came to love the ending that the Epilogue brought (barring the upcoming spinoff-like movie that is Mirai Fukuin). As for the rest: Sejin said: The fifth movie really threw me for a loop. It seemed so back and forth throughout that I was kinda lost for most of it. It was only after the fact, when I read a plot summary of it on Wikipedia to try to make sense of it, and realized that it was supposed to be two arcs playing out side by side in time, followed by a final arc that concluded the movie, that it made much sense. So I probably missed a lot from that movie in particular, and I know that's one where, like you said, they talk rather heavily about a lot of the concepts in the series. Yeah the confusing narrative was definitely intentional as it was meant to convey the same level of confusion and atmosphere as Tomoe's character (the main central focus that drove the initial plot of that movie) through a series of cyclical and paradox-like presentation. I absolutely loved it myself (not that it was easy to watch of course, but the experience was definitely worth it). Sejin said: With so much talked about and explained in the epilogue, it's a lot to process and connect with the other movies to make full sense of it all. It's funny, I don't feel so bent out of shape about the epilogue as I did when I first posted, which was around 5 or 6 in the morning. I guess that's what sleep can do for you. Haha it's okay, that's perfectly understandable. I myself watched the Epilogue when I was tired the first time VERY late at night (bad idea). I watched it the next morning when I was much more calmer and had a clear mind, and it definitely made more sense to me haha! Sejin said: Thanks for stating clearly the concepts and ideas presented in the series. That alone helps a lot in focusing my thoughts and piecing things together. And, hopefully, maybe you'll be able to help me understand some of the things I'm having a harder time wrapping my mind around. Absolutely no problem! I'm more than happy to clear up these things. ^_^ EDIT - Damn, I hope my post wasn't TOO long (if you want I can move this whole post through PM to avoid clogging up this page). Also forgive me if there were any typos or grammatical errors there. =_= |
ronriJun 20, 2013 2:19 AM
Jun 17, 2013 6:31 PM
#116
ronri said: EDIT - Damn, I hope my post wasn't TOO long (if you want I can move this whole post through PM to avoid clogging up this page). Also forgive me if there were any typos or grammatical errors there. =_= No, it wasn't too long. I was able to follow it just fine. Thank you so much for explaining everything so thoroughly! Although, it was around 2 this morning when I first read it, so I don't know how much of it made perfect sense to me. It's weird: I was tired when I read it, but I remember at least some of it starting to make more sense, but now I can't even remember what made more sense. >.< You can move the post through PM (I'm guessing that's the "Messages" section under the "Profile" heading at the top of the page?) if you want, either way is fine with me. I probably won't have much to say for a few days or so, though. My brain still feels fried, so unfortunately I don't think I'd have much luck at comprehending it if I tried rereading your post again today. I'm planning on trying again tomorrow after more sleep. I'd like to read your post through fully a couple more times, and then just spend some time thinking and trying to connect everything and make as much sense of it as I can from what you wrote. And then, if there's still something that doesn't make sense, or if I just want to discuss it more or anything, I can posit that. What I'd really like to do, in addition to taking the time outside of watching the series to understand it in my head, is to marathon it at least twice (I've watched it once in release order over five or so nights, one or two movies a night): the first time in chronological order and the second time again in release order. I feel like if I can understand it in my head WHILE watching it, that that's how I'll get the most out of it. And watching it all in one go probably makes it easier to understand than watching it piecemeal over a number of days. Kara no Kyoukai is the first series I've been so determined to comprehend fully. It's one of only two anime that have ever completely floored me upon watching it the first time, even without understanding it fully (the other one is Gankutsuou: The Count of Monte Cristo). On top of that, it's the only anime I've seen that literally has everything I like in anime and does it all well or better. |
Jun 19, 2013 10:22 PM
#117
@ronri Okay, I'm beginning to make some headway in understanding this stuff. I've run into a few stumbling blocks, though, in the form of things that I think I understand, but am not sure if I actually do understand. I decided the best way to make sense of everything was to start from the ground up, working sequentially. I need to understand these things I have questions about before I can proceed to the next step, so to speak. I'm hoping you can help me clear them up. I'm going to put it all in spoiler tags to try to minimize clogging up the page. 1) I assume that the Origin is the same thing as the concept of Wuji, from Taiji theory. Is this accurate? 2) In your post, you mention the concept of the Origin's will. This is how I currently understand the concept: If the Origin is nothingness, it wouldn't have a will, as we think of the concept. However, if you were to imagine that it did have a will, that will would be to bring about nothingness. If the Origin is nothingness, all it would know of is nothingness, because there is nothing else there to be exposed to. It wouldn't know of anything else to want. Thus, the will of the Origin is to bring about nothingness. Is this accurate? 3) This is the one that I'm least sure about. It has to do with how the body's personality relates to the mind's personality. I've understood this in two different ways. Both ways operate under this assumption: A person's origin and their true nature are the exact same thing. Their body (and by extension, their body's personality) is an undiluted, unfiltered, pure manifestation of the person's origin in physical, human form. Technically, a person's body's personality is not the exact same thing as their origin, but it may as well be because there's virtually no difference between them. After reading your post and giving it some thought, I initially understood the concept as follows: A person's origin is their body's personality. Through the development of their brain from infancy and through interaction with the outside world, their origin adapts to the outside world via their mind and is understood by their mind and expressed outwardly as their personality, enabling the person to live a normal life. This mind-based personality is how the concept of personality is typically understood. Because of this acculturation of sorts to the outside world, a person's origin is diluted and/or suppressed or repressed unconsciously to the point where the person forgets what their origin is. If reawakened to their origin, a person increasingly becomes closer to an embodiment of that origin, and is no longer able to live a normal life, like Lio. That seems pretty similar to what you said. I re-watched the epilogue last night. After that, and after giving it considerably more thought, this is how I currently understand the concept: When the mind develops a personality, it does so through intelligence, which enables the mind's personality to be aware of itself. Because it has intelligence and self-awareness, the mind's personality is able to adapt and become acculturated to the outside world, enabling the person to live a normal life. The body, however, doesn't have intelligence, so the personality derived from it isn't aware of its own existence and cannot mediate between itself and the outside world. This is why the mind's personality is considered a more stable self than the body's personality, and why, when it develops, it immediately becomes redundant and pointless for the body to also have a personality, so the body's personality is just there from then on, not being perceived by either the body or the mind. In addition, an origin derives the body. The body then derives the mind. Both the body and mind each derive a personality. All of this can be traced back to the person's origin. This origin carries through to all subsequent developments. For example, say a person's origin is devouring. This origin is embodied by the body, and through the body, the body's personality as well. The body also gives rise to the mind/brain. Again, through the body, the origin of devouring is carried through to the mind/brain, and through that, to the mind's personality. It is the existence of intelligence in the mind that enables the mind's personality to mediate between itself and the outside world, enabling the person to live a normal life. This is why the mind doesn't end up like the body even though they are derived from the same origin. The current way I understand it seems to me to be much closer to how it was explained in the epilogue. I noticed the second time watching it that it seemed like they really tried to hammer in that the body's personality and the mind's personality are distinct from one another. I also drew an admittedly shoddy flowchart to help myself understand the process sequentially. Here it is (sorry, it's cut off a little on the left side; the word in pencil is "Origin" and the word in red is "nothingness"): I wrote "nothingness" in red next to all the different steps along the way to illustrate how the origin carries through everything that derives from it. If you can't read it (AKA if my handwriting is too poor), let me know and I'll tell you what it says. It should be okay, though. I think the picture is clear enough for it to be legible. Which of the two ways I understood it is accurate? Are either of them accurate? Am I still missing something? I have to admit, even though they're challenging to piece together, I really like the concepts that Kara no Kyoukai delves into, both on their own and as they relate to the story and characters and all the rest of it. I like how they're so intricately intertwined, yet they don't become convoluted. Thanks in advance for your guidance! ^_^ |
SejinJun 19, 2013 10:45 PM
Jun 20, 2013 2:06 AM
#118
@Sejin Sorry for the VERY late reply, I was busy for the past few days and I wasn't able to reply to your previous comment. Still I appreciate that we're actually able to discuss about this in depth, it's definitely a rarity within these forums. ^_^ That said, I'll address your points. (spoiler-tagging to avoid clogging it up as well) 1) Yeah, Nasu's concept of the Origin is pretty much derived from the Wuji (except of course it's simply fictionalized and somewhat appropriated for the sake of storytelling in this case). ^_^ 2) Essentially yes. Recall that Shiki's 3rd personality claimed that the main reason it stayed dormant for so long, despite its sentience, was because it literally desired nothing. While you could argue that it's "out-of-character" for it to reveal itself to Mikiya in the end, I'd say that's more for narrative purposes as it specifically went out of its way to recognize Mikiya's sincerity and care for not allowing Shiki to go down such a destructive path (despite everything about her pointing towards it). In the case of why the Mystic Eyes can actively destroy things, it's simply Shiki herself channeling her connection from the Origin rather than the Origin acting out on its own. 3) Okay, I can see your two ways of understanding it and I'd say that the latter one is more accurate though I recognize that I didn't infer the same details well enough since I was mainly focusing on Shiki's unique case; in which her character literally became the manifestation that directly channels the Origin/Wuji itself in narrative terms (so I apologize if I wasn't very clear on that). For reference this is the point that I agree with: Sejin said: I re-watched the epilogue last night. After that, and after giving it considerably more thought, this is how I currently understand the concept: When the mind develops a personality, it does so through intelligence, which enables the mind's personality to be aware of itself. Because it has intelligence and self-awareness, the mind's personality is able to adapt and become acculturated to the outside world, enabling the person to live a normal life. The body, however, doesn't have intelligence, so the personality derived from it isn't aware of its own existence and cannot mediate between itself and the outside world. This is why the mind's personality is considered a more stable self than the body's personality, and why, when it develops, it immediately becomes redundant and pointless for the body to also have a personality, so the body's personality is just there from then on, not being perceived by either the body or the mind. In addition, an origin derives the body. The body then derives the mind. Both the body and mind each derive a personality. All of this can be traced back to the person's origin. This origin carries through to all subsequent developments. For example, say a person's origin is devouring. This origin is embodied by the body, and through the body, the body's personality as well. The body also gives rise to the mind/brain. Again, through the body, the origin of devouring is carried through to the mind/brain, and through that, to the mind's personality. It is the existence of intelligence in the mind that enables the mind's personality to mediate between itself and the outside world, enabling the person to live a normal life. This is why the mind doesn't end up like the body even though they are derived from the same origin. The current way I understand it seems to me to be much closer to how it was explained in the epilogue. I noticed the second time watching it that it seemed like they really tried to hammer in that the body's personality and the mind's personality are distinct from one another. Yup, this is all pretty much accurate. Now I'll try to expand on what you've said. The origin of the person is essentially their true nature (which I recognize that you also said), but I'll add that although the body's personality is also directly tied to the person's origin as their body is still more of a container than a literal manifestation of their origin (hence why their very physical attributes don't necessarily embody the very characteristics of said origin as they're more like shell). For clarity, I wasn't necessarily saying that the body itself is the manifestation of the person's origin, rather it acts as a channel, in which their origin dictates the person's instinctive drive or alternatively, the very body's personality. It's basically the directionality of their existence. The retail subs of KNK is actually much more clear on this than the currently available fansubs, as it describes that a person's origin serves as their base direction (specifically when Touko was discussing the nature of Lio's awakened origin and how the various experiences/attributes of all the existences of said origin piled up into one entity). In Lio's case, by unraveling and forcing this instinctive directionality into the forefront, Araya essentially turned Lio into a chaotic embodiment of his respective origin (Consumption/to devour). As such, the main attributes of all of the respective existences that possessed this same origin began to messily merge and accumulate together, thereby slowly changing Lio's biology (hence the predatory traits such as the claws, the writhing internal body parts, and also inhuman physical attributes such as his agility, strength and even the excessive saliva etc.) The main given reason why this was bad is because it's literally untangling the person's overall existence to the point that their container (their body) and in doing so, their mind, become literally affected by it all. As for the rest, you're pretty much spot-on in regards as to how the mind mediates all of this and why it's viewed as the stable one. I guess the bizarre thing in Shiki's case is that by forcing the body's personality and halting it from undergoing its destined fate (especially since hers is the origin of Nothingness which is arguably the closest/direct origin tied to the Origin itself), the Ryougi family negated this and in doing so, allowed her body's personality (basically her origin of Nothingness which is practically the Origin itself at this point) to maintain a perceivable sense of sentience. I think my new added points don't clash with what you've said and I hope that clears it all up? (though do point out any confusing contradictions I might have made, as I'm mainly going by memory here) I think I addressed all your main points and I recognize that you pretty much nailed it with that last bit about the relation between the origin, the body, the mind, the body's personality AND the mind's personality. Also I definitely appreciate you going out of your way to even make a flow chart (that really surprised me, but a pleasant surprise nonetheless!) Lastly... Sejin said: I have to admit, even though they're challenging to piece together, I really like the concepts that Kara no Kyoukai delves into, both on their own and as they relate to the story and characters and all the rest of it. I like how they're so intricately intertwined, yet they don't become convoluted. I'll admit, this is pretty much why I love KNK! I appreciate the level of subtlety throughout the series in regards to such concepts, and while the Epilogue was more direct about it, I find that it's relevance to the story is what makes it worthy enough as a more ponderous yet introspective epilogue to the series. Like you said, the concepts they delve into are actually interesting on their own without becoming completely convoluted. At the same time, what makes me love it is how, despite all the intricacies of the concepts that are tackled within the series, it's mainly used to highlight the depth of the very human story and the idea/development of the characters themselves. You're welcome and thank you as well! I haven't had a good discussion like that in a while myself and I definitely appreciate all of your replies! ^_^ |
ronriJun 20, 2013 2:22 AM
Jun 20, 2013 6:54 PM
#119
@ronri It's okay. Life happens. I really hadn't solidified my thoughts until yesterday anyways. Thanks so much for your post! It helped a lot! It's quite a relief to know that I do understand what I think I understand. Oh, and feel free to use that flowchart if you ever happen to need or want it. In light of what you said, I have some more thoughts about a person's origin and how it relates to the body and the body's personality, and how the mind's personality is related to all of that. Enter the spoiler tags! You said: The origin of the person is essentially their true nature (which I recognize that you also said), but I'll add that although the body's personality is also directly tied to the person's origin as their body is still more of a container than a literal manifestation of their origin (hence why their very physical attributes don't necessarily embody the very characteristics of said origin as they're more like shell). For clarity, I wasn't necessarily saying that the body itself is the manifestation of the person's origin, rather it acts as a channel, in which their origin dictates the person's instinctive drive or alternatively, the very body's personality. It's basically the directionality of their existence. The retail subs of KNK is actually much more clear on this than the currently available fansubs, as it describes that a person's origin serves as their base direction (specifically when Touko was discussing the nature of Lio's awakened origin and how the various experiences/attributes of all the existences of said origin piled up into one entity). That was VERY helpful, especially how you described the body as a channel. I combined that with what I said and tried to make it into a coherent train of thought. This is what I came up with: A person's origin and their true nature are the exact same thing. Their body acts as a channel through which their origin guides their existence. This manifests itself as a tendency for the person to have thoughts and perform behaviors that are in line with their origin. This tendency is the body's personality. If the body was sentient and aware of this tendency, because it doesn't have intelligence to mediate between itself and the outside world, rather than being more like a gentle nudge, the body's personality would be like an overwhelming drive or a very strong impulse to think and act in a way that is consistent with the person's origin, which would be socially destructive and counterproductive. Even though the mind, being derived from the body, has the same tendency as the body, and even though it has self-awareness, because it also has intelligence, it is not nearly as easily overwhelmed and overtaken by that tendency as the body would be if it were self-aware, to the point that that would hardly, if ever, happen on its own. In putting that together, I also went on a bit of a tangent, which I tried to flesh out. Hopefully this makes sense. If not, just let me know and I'll try to clarify it: It's not looked at from this angle in the epilogue, but I think that looking at it from the perspective of evolutionary psychology can provide a good framework for making sense of the mind's personality/body's personality topic. One thing I learned in my psychology classes in college is that our brains have a lot of built-in redundancy. Because of this redundancy, even if something goes wrong, unless it's on a very massive scale, the brain is able to compensate almost perfectly. From an evolutionary perspective, such a trait is very advantageous to the survival of whatever has it. I don't think it's much of a stretch to assume that our bodies also have a good deal of built-in redundancy. I think it's reasonable to assume that the redundancy that is built into the sequential progression that I drew in my flowchart is there because it was evolutionarily advantageous to humans because it enabled them to not be destined to be socially destructive and counterproductive if just one or two relatively minor things went wrong in the process of a person's growth and development from infancy onward. Again, this isn't something that's talked about in the epilogue, but I think it offers a decent possible explanation of why both the body and the mind develop distinct personalities and why the redundancy in that process is there to begin with. Without that foundation, you just have to accept that those things are the way they are in the Kara no Kyoukai universe without knowing why, which can make it harder to understand, because you have to have a greater suspension of disbelief. Hopefully that doesn't sound like I just went off into left field or something. There are some things about the Ryougi family's involvement in Shiki's specific case that I haven't pieced together yet. But, that's because I haven't quite gotten to that point yet. Once I'm able to fit this last bit into place with the rest of the things that I do understand for certain, I'll be at the point where I'll be able to start trying to understand how it all relates to Shiki's case. It probably sounds like a lot of work, but if I don't do it this way, it's going to be much more difficult for me to piece the rest of it together. You're welcome! I'm really enjoying our discussion as well! ^_^ I like understanding and discussing concepts and ideas in general, and since these concepts are intriguing in their own right, not to mention being integral to Kara no Kyoukai, which is quickly becoming one of my favorite anime, I've really gotten into this. Thanks to you, too, for talking about this at length with me! ^_^ |
SejinJun 20, 2013 7:15 PM
Jun 24, 2013 11:12 AM
#120
Sejin said: Kara no Kyoukai is the first series I've been so determined to comprehend fully. It's one of only two anime that have ever completely floored me upon watching it the first time, even without understanding it fully (the other one is Gankutsuou: The Count of Monte Cristo). On top of that, it's the only anime I've seen that literally has everything I like in anime and does it all well or better. Welcome brother. I went through a similar stage upon my first viewing of KnK -- I was over-obsessed with it and wanted to know everything I could. Luckily for me, ronri was posting a lot of useful information at the time, much like he is now. He is definitely an expert in these matters. |
Jun 24, 2013 5:37 PM
#121
@Verdale I think it's a very good sign when an anime (or anything, really) can get people that into it, and that hungry to learn more about it, or to experience it more fully, or any of that kind of thing. Yeah, ronri has been incredibly helpful! He definitely has a very comprehensive and impressive understanding of Kara no Kyoukai. I believe he's also read the novels, which probably helps a lot. I think it can be easier to understand character interactions and motivations in written form because it's often written out, whereas in the medium of video, you have to rely more on expressions, especially if the characters' thoughts aren't expressed. And if you have a 15+ year-old TV that you sit several feet away from when watching, the subtler changes in a character's expressions can be difficult to make out. I plan to read the novels myself eventually. Unfortunately, from what I've read on Wikipedia and from looking on Amazon.com, they haven't been released in English. Do you know of any particularly good fan translations? I found a website that has translations, but I haven't read any of it yet, so I don't know how accurate they are. |
Jun 25, 2013 12:30 PM
#122
Sejin said: @ronri It's okay. Life happens. I really hadn't solidified my thoughts until yesterday anyways. Yup and it just so happens I was even more busy for the past few days, so I apologize for that. =_= Anyway I'll address your new points: (spoiler tagging) Sejin said: A person's origin and their true nature are the exact same thing. Their body acts as a channel through which their origin guides their existence. This manifests itself as a tendency for the person to have thoughts and perform behaviors that are in line with their origin. This tendency is the body's personality. If the body was sentient and aware of this tendency, because it doesn't have intelligence to mediate between itself and the outside world, rather than being more like a gentle nudge, the body's personality would be like an overwhelming drive or a very strong impulse to think and act in a way that is consistent with the person's origin, which would be socially destructive and counterproductive. Even though the mind, being derived from the body, has the same tendency as the body, and even though it has self-awareness, because it also has intelligence, it is not nearly as easily overwhelmed and overtaken by that tendency as the body would be if it were self-aware, to the point that that would hardly, if ever, happen on its own. Nailed it. This is pretty much as accurate as it gets. Sejin said: In putting that together, I also went on a bit of a tangent, which I tried to flesh out. Hopefully this makes sense. If not, just let me know and I'll try to clarify it: It's not looked at from this angle in the epilogue, but I think that looking at it from the perspective of evolutionary psychology can provide a good framework for making sense of the mind's personality/body's personality topic. One thing I learned in my psychology classes in college is that our brains have a lot of built-in redundancy. Because of this redundancy, even if something goes wrong, unless it's on a very massive scale, the brain is able to compensate almost perfectly. From an evolutionary perspective, such a trait is very advantageous to the survival of whatever has it. I don't think it's much of a stretch to assume that our bodies also have a good deal of built-in redundancy. I think it's reasonable to assume that the redundancy that is built into the sequential progression that I drew in my flowchart is there because it was evolutionarily advantageous to humans because it enabled them to not be destined to be socially destructive and counterproductive if just one or two relatively minor things went wrong in the process of a person's growth and development from infancy onward. Again, this isn't something that's talked about in the epilogue, but I think it offers a decent possible explanation of why both the body and the mind develop distinct personalities and why the redundancy in that process is there to begin with. Without that foundation, you just have to accept that those things are the way they are in the Kara no Kyoukai universe without knowing why, which can make it harder to understand, because you have to have a greater suspension of disbelief. That's fair enough. I definitely recognize why you'd put forward such an explanation as it definitely makes the ideas easier to grasp. Personally I'm fairly open-minded about it as the very nature of the workings of how it's approached in KNK is more for the sake of addressing its themes and for storytelling purposes (especially since it lends well to tackling ideas, such as the whole "choice/free will vs. fate/instinctual directionality" in regards to the whole ordeal with Shiki and Lio). That said, I myself am not against with coming up with ideas that can help explain such concepts, especially if it leads to even more interesting ideas that would allow us to discuss about and/or extrapolate from the narrative/concepts. In regards to your point, I can definitely see how the idea of evolutionary development can tie into how humans adapted such a trait for the sake of better functionality overall, not to mention I don't really think it contradicts anything within the Epilogue. Heck I wouldn't be surprised if that was essentially the mindset that the author was on when he wrote about the relationship between the body and the mind in the context of KNK. Sejin said: There are some things about the Ryougi family's involvement in Shiki's specific case that I haven't pieced together yet. But, that's because I haven't quite gotten to that point yet. Once I'm able to fit this last bit into place with the rest of the things that I do understand for certain, I'll be at the point where I'll be able to start trying to understand how it all relates to Shiki's case. It probably sounds like a lot of work, but if I don't do it this way, it's going to be much more difficult for me to piece the rest of it together. Honestly in the case of Shiki's family, it's actually somewhat hard to talk about the details as Nasu (the author) barely ever expanded on them. Personally, I don't mind the fact that the author didn't explain everything, it certainly allows the idea of clan-based families like the Ryougi's, the Asagami's, and the Fujou's to retain a sense of mystique in the way of supernatural arcane rituals. In that regard, it does further add to the idea that Shiki's survival in of itself is actually a phenomenon, as it only truly happened due to humans playing god with forces they don't understand. For a little bit of insight, the novel elaborates on how Touko actually dislikes family clans like the Ryougi dynasty (except Shiki herself, of course), as she finds their practices to be very dated and secretive to the point that they're practically messing around with powerful forces on their own accord to simply further and supposedly strengthen their lineage (without notice or any consultation from actual professional Magi at that). Sejin said: You're welcome! I'm really enjoying our discussion as well! ^_^ I like understanding and discussing concepts and ideas in general, and since these concepts are intriguing in their own right, not to mention being integral to Kara no Kyoukai, which is quickly becoming one of my favorite anime, I've really gotten into this. Thanks to you, too, for talking about this at length with me! ^_^ Much appreciated! Also I appreciate the kind words (you too Verdale). Honestly, in the case of KNK, I think when I first got into, I was just so surprised at how the series truly catered to a lot themes and ideas that I'm actually very fond of (especially in terms of philosophy, religion and supernatural concepts and tropes). Admittedly, what actually pushed me to look up all the various info and details on the series was mainly to do with my overall dissatisfaction in not knowing whether certain decisions made in the story were actually intentional or not. One such case that truly kept me on edge back then was if Lio's character construction and in my opinion, the genius behind it, was purely coincidental. In that regard, the more I read about the series in bits and pieces, the more I really got into it as a whole. I'll admit I've actually watched the films a number of times already (I'm even undergoing a modified subbing project for all the films as I'm personally a bit dissatisfied with some of the translations in the currently-available subs). Personally having looked into it quite a lot as well as interviews, arguably the films are actually the definitive interpretations of the story (heck even the author considers the films more canon than the original novels now). Even reading certain segments of the novels, you'll come understand why certain decisions were made for their respective film versions and, to my surprise, it made me appreciate some of the direction they took with the films even more than before. Personally while I definitely think that the novel serves as an informational "backbone" or a pseudo-database for the series, I find that the very essence of the stories and the intended message and atmosphere they were meant to evoke were actually captured by the films. As for film as a medium in relation to this series, I'll admit I've actually watched the films a number of times and I'm even undergoing a new subbing project for all films. One thing that I myself realized and came to love about the series is how they were put together in terms of cinematography, keeping in mind that they're meant to be films as opposed to simply being a TV series of sorts. Watching it without subs at times, you really come to appreciate the subtle shifts in the various character's expressions, sound effects and even the character placement/camera angles/what you see on the screen at the given point in time (essentially the very idea of Mise-en-scene to be precise). But yes again, thanks for the wonderful discussion! ^_^ |
ronriJun 26, 2013 12:54 AM
Jun 27, 2013 7:28 PM
#123
@ronri Sorry for the late reply. I guess it's my turn to have been busy. =/ Being busy sucks. And thanks so much for helping me fully clarify all my questions about the body's personality/mind's personality stuff! I really appreciate it! ronri said: That's fair enough. I definitely recognize why you'd put forward such an explanation as it definitely makes the ideas easier to grasp. Personally I'm fairly open-minded about it as the very nature of the workings of how it's approached in KNK is more for the sake of addressing its themes and for storytelling purposes (especially since it lends well to tackling ideas, such as the whole "choice/free will vs. fate/instinctual directionality" in regards to the whole ordeal with Shiki and Lio). I can suspend my sense of disbelief pretty easily. I just enjoy delving into the "why"s. It's probably just my inner armchair philosopher coming out. :P I was thinking about Shiki's case, building on what I've come to understand about the universe of Kara no Kyoukai, and I'm a little confused. As you said, Shiki's origin is nothingness, meaning she should have been stillborn. Her family performed their clan's customs of infusing multiple personalities into a body from the outside. As stated in the epilogue, instead of one of those ready-made personalities coming to inhabit Shiki's body, the process somehow made her body sentient, and it was able to recognize the existence of its own personality. The part that I'm confused about is, given what we've been talking about up to now about how, if the body was aware of its personality, that tendency would be overwhelming, why didn't Shiki die anyways? If her body's personality desires nothingness, and still has the origin of nothingness, why wouldn't the same thing have happened as if Shiki were just stillborn? Did the process that resulted in making the body sentient also force life and a will to keep living onto the body, even though it didn't want it? Is that what Shiki was referring to when she talked about her family exposing the world to her against her will? But again, if that was the case, why is it that her body's personality didn't overwhelm her like Lio's did with him and lead her to kill herself or kill others (I'm not talking about having the tendency to want to kill and being able to suppress it)? Did the clan's customs also somehow give the body intelligence? There's a lot there that I'm having trouble making sense of. On a different note, because Shiki is more closely connected to the Origin as a result of her own origin being nothingness, would that make her body's personality--her innate tendency to bring about nothingness--more potent than a normal person's tendency to act and think in line with their origin, and thus harder for her to reconcile with the outside world? ronri said: Much appreciated! Also I appreciate the kind words (you too Verdale). Honestly, in the case of KNK, I think when I first got into, I was just so surprised at how the series truly catered to a lot themes and ideas that I'm actually very fond of (especially in terms of philosophy, religion and supernatural concepts and tropes). Admittedly, what actually pushed me to look up all the various info and details on the series was mainly to do with my overall dissatisfaction in not knowing whether certain decisions made in the story were actually intentional or not. One such case that truly kept me on edge back then was if Lio's character construction and in my opinion, the genius behind it, was purely coincidental. In that regard, the more I read about the series in bits and pieces, the more I really got into it as a whole. I'll admit I've actually watched the films a number of times already (I'm even undergoing a modified subbing project for all the films as I'm personally a bit dissatisfied with some of the translations in the currently-available subs). You're very welcome! What conclusion did you come to regarding whether Lio's character construction was coincidental or not? I have a retail version of the series on DVD, so I think I had it easier with the subtitles. Although, I've taken a few Japanese classes, so I know that the Japanese language and culture are heavily context-based. As a result, when I watch something in Japanese that has English subtitles, I interpret the subtitles more generally, rather than literally. I try to get a feel for the meaning of the whole sentence or series of sentences, rather than the literal meaning of the words or sentences. One thing that I realized may be useful when watching Kara no Kyoukai is being able to distinguish between masculine and feminine ways of speaking, which I can't do. I read that they change the color of Shiki's kimono depending on which personality is speaking. But I read that after watching the movies, so I didn't think to look. And I haven't re-watched them yet. I've told a few friends and family members about Kara no Kyoukai. In trying to describe it to them (the visuals, audio, voice acting, genres, etc.), I realized that it's not that Kara no Kyoukai necessarily belongs in various different genres, but that it incorporates elements from those genres as it needs them for its story or characters, and that it's heavily story- and character-driven, rather than subscribing heavily to any specific genre, aside from maybe the murder-mystery genre. I really like that about it. You're welcome! And thank YOU for the wonderful discussion as well! ^_^ I enjoy hearing your thoughts about the cinematography. It's not the kind of thing I notice easily or quickly, so I like hearing that different perspective, especially since you've spent so much time exploring this series. |
SejinJun 27, 2013 7:44 PM
Jul 2, 2013 10:46 PM
#124
Sorry for replying so late. I was quite busy and while I read your post a few days ago, I haven't had time to reply to it in proper. Spoiler-tagging once again! Sejin said: I can suspend my sense of disbelief pretty easily. I just enjoy delving into the "why"s. It's probably just my inner armchair philosopher coming out. :P Yeah, I'm pretty much the same. Depending on the series, I do like delving on various concepts and ideas to further enhance my experience surrounding the work, and with such a rich plethora of philosophies and themes being touched on in a series like Kara no Kyoukai, it's hard NOT to resist doing just that. XD Sejin said: I was thinking about Shiki's case, building on what I've come to understand about the universe of Kara no Kyoukai, and I'm a little confused. As you said, Shiki's origin is nothingness, meaning she should have been stillborn. Her family performed their clan's customs of infusing multiple personalities into a body from the outside. As stated in the epilogue, instead of one of those ready-made personalities coming to inhabit Shiki's body, the process somehow made her body sentient, and it was able to recognize the existence of its own personality. The part that I'm confused about is, given what we've been talking about up to now about how, if the body was aware of its personality, that tendency would be overwhelming, why didn't Shiki die anyways? If her body's personality desires nothingness, and still has the origin of nothingness, why wouldn't the same thing have happened as if Shiki were just stillborn? Did the process that resulted in making the body sentient also force life and a will to keep living onto the body, even though it didn't want it? Is that what Shiki was referring to when she talked about her family exposing the world to her against her will? You actually pretty much answered your own question there. In particular, I highlighted a specific part of the text in bold as this pretty much the idea behind her body's personality/origin gaining life and true sentience. It was an unnatural process, resulting in an unnatural outcome separate from the "standard" functions of how the origin was meant to act upon. The rest I will elaborate on within the following: Sejin said: But again, if that was the case, why is it that her body's personality didn't overwhelm her like Lio's did with him and lead her to kill herself or kill others (I'm not talking about having the tendency to want to kill and being able to suppress it)? Did the clan's customs also somehow give the body intelligence? There's a lot there that I'm having trouble making sense of. The main difference between Shiki and Lio is that Lio's origin was "unraveled" unlike Shiki's which had accidentally gained true sentience and life through the clan's intervention. To elaborate, what distinguishes Lio is that the whole structure of his existence was broken down (note: the "structure", not the existence), unhinging and awakening all of the collective "information" and leading all of the past lives and experiences of the directionality (his origin of Consumption) to pile up into a chaotic mass of an entity. Beyond simply the origin itself, any connecting past life that possessed that origin began to influence his biology and mind, slowly turning him into a literal embodiment of all things that had previously possessed the origin of Consumption (really horrible way to go considering how his biology and mind would have constantly shifted if Shiki hadn't killed him). To summarize, it goes along the lines of this: - Shiki's case: Through the clan's personal "modifications" and tampering, they forcibly brought the origin/body's personality to the surface, in which the end result allowed it to develop true sentience (it's like they forced life into the redundancies that we discussed, thereby becoming a literal "second mind" and creating its own personality). - Lio's case: Through Araya's tampering and Lio's consent, Araya removed all of the origin's "inhibitors" and awakened what were supposed to be the dormant experiences of the origin's past lives, leaving his body and mind to deal with the unfiltered mass of impulses and influence derived from the origin's experiences. His origin didn't gain intelligence, the very structure the held his existence intact was removed (bringing along all of the origin's past lives, thus "awakening" the origin of Consumption). Sejin said: On a different note, because Shiki is more closely connected to the Origin as a result of her own origin being nothingness, would that make her body's personality--her innate tendency to bring about nothingness--more potent than a normal person's tendency to act and think in line with their origin, and thus harder for her to reconcile with the outside world? Essentially yes, it's where her murderous tendencies are derived from anyway. Couple that with her split personalities (which was hinted to drive them insane and confirmed in the novel where most of their clan's heir have been put in asylums) her whole character was a recipe for disaster. That's why the third personality (almost synonymous with the Origin in her case), out of a rare sheer display of kindness and generosity, appeared before Mikiya and offered him anything he wished; due to the very role that he played in greatly stabilizing Shiki's life. Sejin said: You're very welcome! What conclusion did you come to regarding whether Lio's character construction was coincidental or not? I was worried at the time if Nasu's writing of Lio's character was treated with care and actual purposeful intentions as opposed to simply because Nasu needed a final antagonist (mainly because I thought that his character construction was pure genius so I basically wondered if his writing was intentional and purposeful on the author's part and not just pure coincidence). Reading Nasu's interviews, I was surprised to find that he's actually one of the characters he was most invested in, specifically in terms of role, creation, and writing; to the point that Nasu even admitted to crying during Lio's scenes of desperation because he claims that the film perfectly captured the exact spirit of his intentions regarding the character's portrayal. Needless to say, it's how it further cemented my liking for Lio's character beyond my previous fondness and intrigue (which admittedly is strange in of itself, as I actually like Shiki separately as a character of her own just as much as Lio, despite the two being the complete opposite to each other and how the two possess such an antagonistic relationship). Sejin said: I have a retail version of the series on DVD, so I think I had it easier with the subtitles. Although, I've taken a few Japanese classes, so I know that the Japanese language and culture are heavily context-based. As a result, when I watch something in Japanese that has English subtitles, I interpret the subtitles more generally, rather than literally. I try to get a feel for the meaning of the whole sentence or series of sentences, rather than the literal meaning of the words or sentences. One thing that I realized may be useful when watching Kara no Kyoukai is being able to distinguish between masculine and feminine ways of speaking, which I can't do. I read that they change the color of Shiki's kimono depending on which personality is speaking. But I read that after watching the movies, so I didn't think to look. And I haven't re-watched them yet. In that regard, you're actually lucky! While the only real issue with the retail subs is how it can sound too formal at times in terms of the dialogue (specifically within the earlier films), the fansubs greatly paled in comparison to the work that was done in the retail subs for the final film (Movie 7). It's why I think you may have enjoyed the 7th film more than a lot of the people on here by virtue of you viewing it with the retail subs. Still, I intend to rectify the mistakes of both works, leading me to a current subbing project to mix the two available subs (with added improvisation on my part to fill in the missing sections of both) in order to get the best result. Sejin said: I've told a few friends and family members about Kara no Kyoukai. In trying to describe it to them (the visuals, audio, voice acting, genres, etc.), I realized that it's not that Kara no Kyoukai necessarily belongs in various different genres, but that it incorporates elements from those genres as it needs them for its story or characters, and that it's heavily story- and character-driven, rather than subscribing heavily to any specific genre, aside from maybe the murder-mystery genre. I really like that about it. You're welcome! And thank YOU for the wonderful discussion as well! ^_^ I enjoy hearing your thoughts about the cinematography. It's not the kind of thing I notice easily or quickly, so I like hearing that different perspective, especially since you've spent so much time exploring this series. Haha you're welcome too! I've thought about the same way in that it's genre isn't entirely fixed as it delves into so many mature themes mainly revolving around social (romance, societal norms/pressure, dangerous and questionable impulses) and existential (perception of one's own existence, place and role in the world) introspection. |
ronriJul 2, 2013 10:56 PM
Jul 3, 2013 9:09 PM
#125
ronri said: Sorry for replying so late. I was quite busy and while I read your post a few days ago, I haven't had time to reply to it in proper. It's okay, no worries. Cue the spoiler tags! ronri said: The main difference between Shiki and Lio is that Lio's origin was "unraveled" unlike Shiki's which had accidentally gained true sentience and life through the clan's intervention. To elaborate, what distinguishes Lio is that the whole structure of his existence was broken down (note: the "structure", not the existence), unhinging and awakening all of the collective "information" and leading all of the past lives and experiences of the directionality (his origin of Consumption) to pile up into a chaotic mass of an entity. Beyond simply the origin itself, any connecting past life that possessed that origin began to influence his biology and mind, slowly turning him into a literal embodiment of all things that had previously possessed the origin of Consumption (really horrible way to go considering how his biology and mind would have constantly shifted if Shiki hadn't killed him). To summarize, it goes along the lines of this: - Shiki's case: Through the clan's personal "modifications" and tampering, they forcibly brought the origin/body's personality to the surface, in which the end result allowed it to develop true sentience (it's like they forced life into the redundancies that we discussed, thereby becoming a literal "second mind" and creating its own personality). - Lio's case: Through Araya's tampering and Lio's consent, Araya removed all of the origin's "inhibitors" and awakened what were supposed to be the dormant experiences of the origin's past lives, leaving his body and mind to deal with the unfiltered mass of impulses and influence derived from the origin's experiences. His origin didn't gain intelligence, the very structure the held his existence intact was removed (bringing along all of the origin's past lives, thus "awakening" the origin of Consumption). Again, thanks so much for the clarification! It helps tremendously! In the epilogue, Shiki's body's personality, talking through Shiki, says that, even though she was awakened, she didn't want to deal with the outside world, so she created Shiki to do it. The subtitles are worded in such a way that it makes it sound like it was an active choice by the body. Given what we've discussed about the progression of the body's and mind's development, that's really no different from how it happens normally (the body gives rise to the mind). So, would it be an accurate assumption to say that it was worded that way because the body was aware of the process? ronri said: Essentially yes, it's where her murderous tendencies are derived from anyway. Couple that with her split personalities (which was hinted to drive them insane and confirmed in the novel where most of their clan's heir have been put in asylums) her whole character was a recipe for disaster. That's why the third personality (almost synonymous with the Origin in her case), out of a rare sheer display of kindness and generosity, appeared before Mikiya and offered him anything he wished; due to the very role that he played in greatly stabilizing Shiki's life. So, did all the Ryougi family heirs have the origin of nothingness? Or was Shiki just that special, even within her clan? Also, while at first I thought Shiki had split/dual personalities, after watching all of the movies--especially after watching the epilogue a second time, I didn't get that impression. What it seemed more like to me was that Shiki and SHIKI were actually the result of a polarization of opposites within Shiki. I understood it as being akin to the progression from Wuji to Taiji to Yin and Yang. Shiki's body's personality (Wuji) gave rise to her mind's personality, Shiki (Taiji), which then became polarized into Shiki (Yin) and SHIKI (Yang). The one thing about that that I don't understand is why Shiki became polarized. The epilogue says that it was so Shiki could "take on the maximum amount of attributes". What does that mean? Did Shiki have to pick up the slack since her body's personality didn't want anything to do with the outside world? On a different note, in the epilogue, Shiki's body's personality says "Maybe this personality called Shiki was like an apogee at the far end of a single foundation. And there is nothing in between. That's why I occupy the space between them." Do you have any idea what that means? I didn't get it when I first watched the epilogue, or even the second time. I still can't make sense of it. My whole reaction is like a big, dumbfounded "huuuuuh???". ronri said: In that regard, you're actually lucky! While the only real issue with the retail subs is how it can sound too formal at times in terms of the dialogue (specifically within the earlier films), the fansubs greatly paled in comparison to the work that was done in the retail subs for the final film (Movie 7). It's why I think you may have enjoyed the 7th film more than a lot of the people on here by virtue of you viewing it with the retail subs. Still, I intend to rectify the mistakes of both works, leading me to a current subbing project to mix the two available subs (with added improvisation on my part to fill in the missing sections of both) in order to get the best result. I thought it was kinda weird in the second movie: Shiki was using the honorific "kun" when talking to Mikiya (Kokutou-kun), which I believe is supposed to signify endearment, yet the subtitles said "Mr. Kokutou". It was kinda funny too, though. I'd definitely like to see the movies with your subtitles once you're finished. |
SejinJul 3, 2013 9:12 PM
Jul 4, 2013 1:51 AM
#126
Wow! Thanks for replying so quickly (spoiler-tagging again). =D Sejin said: Again, thanks so much for the clarification! It helps tremendously! In the epilogue, Shiki's body's personality, talking through Shiki, says that, even though she was awakened, she didn't want to deal with the outside world, so she created Shiki to do it. The subtitles are worded in such a way that it makes it sound like it was an active choice by the body. Given what we've discussed about the progression of the body's and mind's development, that's really no different from how it happens normally (the body gives rise to the mind). So, would it be an accurate assumption to say that it was worded that way because the body was aware of the process? Essentially, yes. You pretty much hit the nail on this one. It was more of an awareness thing, but otherwise it was just stating how the process basically worked on a normal level. Sejin said: So, did all the Ryougi family heirs have the origin of nothingness? Or was Shiki just that special, even within her clan? That's what I mean by Shiki being a special case, out of all the family heirs, she was the only (known) one that had the origin of nothingness. Beyond that, everyone went through the process of being tampered with to develop multiple personalities (however many is the limit was never expanded upon, which in itself is frightening since the movies nor novel ever mentioned they only ever need TWO personalities). This point continues in the following which I'll address... Sejin said: Also, while at first I thought Shiki had split/dual personalities, after watching all of the movies--especially after watching the epilogue a second time, I didn't get that impression. What it seemed more like to me was that Shiki and SHIKI were actually the result of a polarization of opposites within Shiki. I understood it as being akin to the progression from Wuji to Taiji to Yin and Yang. Shiki's body's personality (Wuji) gave rise to her mind's personality, Shiki (Taiji), which then became polarized into Shiki (Yin) and SHIKI (Yang). I think you're definitely spot-on in how it's reflective of the Taiji (Nasu loves his philosophical references) but the extra thing is that it's also tied with the family clan's tampering. The clan's specialty is supposedly tampering and nurturing their heir so that they are able to develop MULTIPLE personalities (frighteningly a limit was never given). My assumption is that, based on the very nature of Shiki's body's personality (Wuji), it specifically gave rise to two personalities in regards to the mind (Taiji). It's interesting how the heirs have been described as maximizing their abilities/skills through multiple personalities, but I'd assume that because of the very nature of Shiki's origin/body's personality, she only needed two personalities which both exhibited a lot of traits for the purpose of "containment" (which I'll address in the following). Sejin said: The one thing about that that I don't understand is why Shiki became polarized. The epilogue says that it was so Shiki could "take on the maximum amount of attributes". What does that mean? Did Shiki have to pick up the slack since her body's personality didn't want anything to do with the outside world? The development of her two personalities was spurred on by the family clan's tampering, which again, leads to... Sejin said: On a different note, in the epilogue, Shiki's body's personality says "Maybe this personality called Shiki was like an apogee at the far end of a single foundation. And there is nothing in between. That's why I occupy the space between them." Do you have any idea what that means? I didn't get it when I first watched the epilogue, or even the second time. I still can't make sense of it. My whole reaction is like a big, dumbfounded "huuuuuh???". This is where the strange relationship of her personalities finally come together. It's highly possible that the only reason Shiki was even kept stable was BECAUSE she had only two personalities. Sort of a complementary relationship between the dangerous nature of her origin and how two personalities were needed to manage this. By keeping the two personalities "busy" in managing her own murderous impulse, it negated the destructive tendencies that usually befall upon Ryougi family heirs where the multiple personalities are said to overwhelm their minds (thus driving them crazy) due to the very nature of having so many personalities. With Shiki, my assumption is that the two personalities became very much preoccupied in managing her murderous impulse (derived from her origin) allowing the two personalities to focus their efforts on something in order to isolate her identity as one collective being (basically, focusing their efforts in managing her mental "priorities" due to the dangers of having such impulses). With the dangers of the two personalities being nearly "fixed" due to Shiki being so self-conscious about herself and around Mikiya (essentially preoccupying both personalities with actual things to focus on), what's left to manage is the impulse of destruction itself, which was "solved" in the end through Mikiya's company and help in actually giving Shiki focus and the prospect of having (as well as desiring) a normal life. To summarize the whole concept though, here's how I think of it: The family clan's tampering with Shiki gave her the prospect of being able to easily develop multiple personalities as per the family's customs. Due to the nature of her origin, it only required two, and that's what the body's personality formed in the end in order to function (essentially forming a Wuji-Taiji relationship), thus reducing the likelihood of Shiki becoming completely insane from being overwhelmed by developing more than two personalities like past heirs of the family clan (it's hinted that it was because only two personalities were needed for her body's personality's "needs", further cementing the Wuji-Taiji reference). This became a pseudo-symbiotic relationship in which the two personalities were left to manage the destructive nature of her origin while Shiki (both personalities as a collective) struggled to find her place in society. With Mikiya's caring love and support throughout those 6 years (indeed it was approximately that long), she and Mikiya were able to solve this (to put it simply) at the end of the story. Regarding the mention of the "apogee", I assume that it was simple musing on the body's personality's part, as I've outlined, it sort of acted as the center point of the whole equation regarding the two personalities (hence the notion in that it occupies the "space" between them). The use of the term might be referring to the metaphysical nature of origins as a whole, hence her (or its) choice of words (though I'll have to watch the scene again before I can honestly and completely confirm this little detail). Well I hope all of that helped in clearing things up. Honestly I appreciate having this discussion and I thank you for it. While most of the details are just in the back of my mind, having to actually talk to someone enables me to lay them out more clearly before my eyes, which truly an enlightening experience and one that I'd like to thank you for. I'd say you weren't really that far from the truth, as certain parts of your ideas just really needed a bit of confirmation on the details on my part. ^_^ Sejin said: I'd definitely like to see the movies with your subtitles once you're finished. No problem! I'm more than happy to send you a message once the project is actually finished. =) |
ronriJul 4, 2013 6:20 AM
Jul 4, 2013 2:21 PM
#127
You're welcome! And just...wow. That was all incredibly helpful! Normally, I'd quote what I'm referring to, but in this case, since it's your entire post, that seemed like it would just be kinda cluttered. But, yeah, once again, that was tremendously helpful! I took some time to mull all of what you said over, and tried to digest it and integrate it with what I've learned thus far, and came up with an overall description/explanation of how I understand Shiki Ryougi (the first paragraph is stuff we've already talked about and you've already confirmed to be accurate, but I included it for the sake of completeness). Spoiler tagging because it's LONG. Normally, a person with the origin of nothingness would be destined to be stillborn. However, as a result of her family's tampering with trying to insert various ready-made personalities into her body from the outside, life and a will to keep living were forced onto Shiki's body. In addition, instead of one of those ready-made personalities taking up residence in Shiki's mind, the process awakened her own body to the existence of its origin and personality, making it self-aware and sentient. Her body, having the origin of nothingness, didn't want anything to do with the outside world. However, because it was also forced to live, to survive, Shiki was created in the mind, as the mind's personality, for the purpose of dealing with the outside world. This is the same progression of development of the body and mind that happens normally in everyone else. The only difference is that Shiki's body is sentient. Subsequently, Shiki split into Shiki and SHIKI. The Ryougi clan traditionally has a custom of infusing multiple personalities into the body of their heir, for the purpose of maximizing their potential. They also purposefully raise the heir in such a way that will elicit the desired outcome. The goal is entirely self-serving: to continually strengthen the clan's lineage, generation after generation. It just so happens that, because of Shiki's origin of nothingness (Wuji), two personalities were the optimum number (Yin and Yang). This split was not forced on Shiki from the outside. Rather, she was raised in such a way that the split of Shiki into Shiki and SHIKI happened on its own. This was also a lucky coincidence for Shiki, because having more than two personalities would have greatly increased the burden on her mind, making her more likely to become insane, like so many heirs before her. Because of Shiki's origin of nothingness and how her development parallels the progression from Wuji to Taiji to Yin and Yang, Shiki and SHIKI, rather than being entirely separate, were fully aware of each other. To at least some extent, they may also have been aware of their collective existence as Shiki. Shiki Ryougi, as a whole, possibly through introspection or some other way, seems to have at least some understanding of her inherent inclination toward mental instability as a result of having more than one personality. Realizing this, she took steps to organize her mental activity and interactions with the rest of the world in such a way that would minimize the likelihood that she'd become insane. This self-understanding, combined with the symbiotic and syncretic relationship of Shiki and SHIKI, helped her keep her mental state more-or-less stabilized, with some hiccups here and there. The addition of Mikiya to her life was a huge turning point for Shiki. Over time, as they gradually became closer, she began to yearn for a normal life. Before this, her attempts at keeping herself stable were somewhat half-hearted. You can think of it like a gauge, with one side being red (negative) and the other side being blue (positive). There's a point between red and blue that is just a single line denoting the half-way point (neutral). Before meeting Mikiya, Shiki's efforts at keeping herself stable were focused on staying at the neutral point and not letting herself slip too far into the red, which would lead to insanity. But, after meeting and growing closer to Mikiya, Shiki came to desire a normal life with him, and was thus motivated to try to get into the blue part of the gauge. Because of how Mikiya is, and because he has the origin of neutrality, he is able to fully accept and love Shiki. His unconditional acceptance of Shiki, their love for one another, and their shared desire to live a normal life together are what enable Shiki to decisively make it into the blue part of the gauge. Regarding that last paragraph, I've started re-watching Kara no Kyoukai, this time in chronological order. In particular, re-watching the second movie and comparing it to the ones that come after it, I got a strong impression of Shiki just kind of drifting and not really being fully present mentally in her day to day life before she met Mikiya, but starting to change after she met him. It was like she was only doing what she needed to do to get by. Those thoughts led to my gauge metaphor. ronri said: Well I hope all of that helped in clearing things up. Honestly I appreciate having this discussion and I thank you for it. While most of the details are just in the back of my mind, having to actually talk to someone enables me to lay them out more clearly before my eyes, which truly an enlightening experience and one that I'd like to thank you for. I'd say you weren't really that far from the truth, as certain parts of your ideas just really needed a bit of confirmation on the details on my part. ^_^ You're very welcome! ^_^ I really appreciate that you've taken the time to so fully respond to my numerous questions and comments and help correct and clarify my understanding of all the stuff we've talked about. ronri said: No problem! I'm more than happy to send you a message once the project is actually finished. =) Awesome! I'm definitely looking forward to it! ^_^ |
SejinJul 4, 2013 2:24 PM
Jul 4, 2013 6:11 PM
#128
I just wanna say....wow, you outlined it perfectly with that post. Even with the supposed lengthiness of your post, everything you said pretty much nailed the whole idea behind how...well... the very core ides in how Shiki's various personalities came into play in the actual story and its relating characters. Beyond me simply declaring that what you said was perfect, I'll even confirm every single part of it just for reassurance. (spoiler-tagging!) Sejin said: Normally, a person with the origin of nothingness would be destined to be stillborn. However, as a result of her family's tampering with trying to insert various ready-made personalities into her body from the outside, life and a will to keep living were forced onto Shiki's body. In addition, instead of one of those ready-made personalities taking up residence in Shiki's mind, the process awakened her own body to the existence of its origin and personality, making it self-aware and sentient. Her body, having the origin of nothingness, didn't want anything to do with the outside world. However, because it was also forced to live, to survive, Shiki was created in the mind, as the mind's personality, for the purpose of dealing with the outside world. This is the same progression of development of the body and mind that happens normally in everyone else. The only difference is that Shiki's body is sentient. I have nothing else to add to this. This is as perfect as it gets. Sejin said: Subsequently, Shiki split into Shiki and SHIKI. The Ryougi clan traditionally has a custom of infusing multiple personalities into the body of their heir, for the purpose of maximizing their potential. They also purposefully raise the heir in such a way that will elicit the desired outcome. The goal is entirely self-serving: to continually strengthen the clan's lineage, generation after generation. It just so happens that, because of Shiki's origin of nothingness (Wuji), two personalities were the optimum number (Yin and Yang). This split was not forced on Shiki from the outside. Rather, she was raised in such a way that the split of Shiki into Shiki and SHIKI happened on its own. Yup, I think what people often mistake is that just because the Ryougi family tampers with their respective children for a potential heir, it doesn't mean that they have full control of how the personalities are able to develop (hence the mention of most, if not all, family heirs being put into asylums for the rest of their lives). Rather, their tampering serves as a catalyst for the body to have the capability to develop as many personalities as they can. In Shiki's case yes, she only needed two (Yin and Yang) and this in turn played a huge role in shaping her character along with her origin of nothingness. Sejin said: This was also a lucky coincidence for Shiki, because having more than two personalities would have greatly increased the burden on her mind, making her more likely to become insane, like so many heirs before her. Because of Shiki's origin of nothingness and how her development parallels the progression from Wuji to Taiji to Yin and Yang, Shiki and SHIKI, rather than being entirely separate, were fully aware of each other. To at least some extent, they may also have been aware of their collective existence as Shiki. Shiki Ryougi, as a whole, possibly through introspection or some other way, seems to have at least some understanding of her inherent inclination toward mental instability as a result of having more than one personality. Realizing this, she took steps to organize her mental activity and interactions with the rest of the world in such a way that would minimize the likelihood that she'd become insane. This self-understanding, combined with the symbiotic and syncretic relationship of Shiki and SHIKI, helped her keep her mental state more-or-less stabilized, with some hiccups here and there. All of this is perfectly accurate. In the novel, it's really interesting how Shiki is very self-aware of how many of her ancestors have gone insane from the same upbringing she was undertaking, and it's really really obvious that she has this kind of mentality in which she tries to organize her mental activity so as to be able to manage having two personalities. But as you have described, this wasn't entirely perfect, as there were still some hiccups along the way. Sejin said: The addition of Mikiya to her life was a huge turning point for Shiki. Over time, as they gradually became closer, she began to yearn for a normal life. Before this, her attempts at keeping herself stable were somewhat half-hearted. You can think of it like a gauge, with one side being red (negative) and the other side being blue (positive). There's a point between red and blue that is just a single line denoting the half-way point (neutral). Before meeting Mikiya, Shiki's efforts at keeping herself stable were focused on staying at the neutral point and not letting herself slip too far into the red, which would lead to insanity. But, after meeting and growing closer to Mikiya, Shiki came to desire a normal life with him, and was thus motivated to try to get into the blue part of the gauge. Because of how Mikiya is, and because he has the origin of neutrality, he is able to fully accept and love Shiki. His unconditional acceptance of Shiki, their love for one another, and their shared desire to live a normal life together are what enable Shiki to decisively make it into the blue part of the gauge. Exactly that, she actually went out of her way to really try and stabilize herself even with all the inherently destructive elements surrounding her life (or even just the very origins of her own inception with the murderous impulse derived from her origin) Sejin said: Regarding that last paragraph, I've started re-watching Kara no Kyoukai, this time in chronological order. In particular, re-watching the second movie and comparing it to the ones that come after it, I got a strong impression of Shiki just kind of drifting and not really being fully present mentally in her day to day life before she met Mikiya, but starting to change after she met him. It was like she was only doing what she needed to do to get by. Those thoughts led to my gauge metaphor. While I have never felt the need to watch Kara no Kyoukai in its chronology (not out of arrogance, I just never did somehow even after watching it 4-5 times by now), I've envisioned its actual chronology in my mind well enough that Shiki's behavior/reactions in Movie 1 (Overlooking View) REALLY felt different than how I perceived it when I watched it in my first viewing of the series. Where in Movie 2 she felt a bit withdrawn at the start, by Movie 1 she actually shows genuine and obvious concern for Mikiya's well-being, only made more evident when you factor how she's actually normally withdrawn in terms of her usual attitude. It really shows how much they've both developed. Just a little side-tracking here: to vouch for Mikiya in some degree, and to dispel the typical lovey-dovey perception.... despite the fact that Mikiya only seemingly cared for Shiki because he simply "loved" her with no other rational reason, Movie 2 actually omitted one specific line at the end of the film from the novel, a line that would have spelled it out more easily for the general audience. Despite the fact that Mikiya claims that he had no rational reason for loving her, in the end after the 2-year time skip he came to realize that he was actually lying after all (this was mainly inferred in the films as opposed to actually being spelled out to the viewer). In the end, he came to understand how much he cares for Shiki's fragile existence (her overall mental instability), and he wanted to be the one to help and care for her and fill in that empty spot she needs due to her self-imposed state of loneliness. What you ought to realize is despite the seeming attraction that Shiki might have inherently held (cute girl, traditional style clothing, holding a sense of mystique due to being an enigma in the eyes of many), she was very snobbish before she met and grew closer to Mikiya, and a lot of people were frightened of her attitude and overall demeanor, coupled with her reputation for being part of a very rich and conservative family (coincidentally, it's why she was so cruel towards Lio despite the guy honestly and nicely just asking her out). By keeping up that lie regarding his sense of romanticism, he's able to maintain that sense of stability that Shiki so desperately needs, and it's this caring and unchanging nature that really attracted Shiki towards Mikiya and why she appreciates him so much. Sejin said: You're very welcome! ^_^ I really appreciate that you've taken the time to so fully respond to my numerous questions and comments and help correct and clarify my understanding of all the stuff we've talked about. What I really appreciate about our discussion is that at least now I have something to refer to (be it recollection or relating information) whenever I need to recall and talk about these things again, and the level of organization you brought onto this along with the confirmation of the details on my part really helped in laying it all down so coherently before my eyes unlike anything I've done on my own before. I thank you for the enlightening discussion, even with Kara no Kyoukai's critical acclaim, it's hard to find people who are actually interested in (or needless to say, even remotely capable of understanding) these more philosophical aspects of the series, and it's discussions like these that make me truly appreciate the work and the kind of discussion it brings. So again, thanks for that. ^_^ |
ronriJul 5, 2013 3:45 AM
Jul 5, 2013 9:58 PM
#129
Thanks! When I spent time thinking about this stuff, I tried to get pretty specific, to make sure I understood it in my head. I also typed it out in a Microsoft Word document, being very methodical and going step-by-step from the ground up. That really helped me to make sense of it all. I can paste the whole thing in here if you think it would be useful. Spoiler-tagging to minimize clutter. ronri said: Yup, I think what people often mistake is that just because the Ryougi family tampers with their respective children for a potential heir, it doesn't mean that they have full control of how the personalities are able to develop (hence the mention of most, if not all, family heirs being put into asylums for the rest of their lives). Rather, their tampering serves as a catalyst for the body to have the capability to develop as many personalities as they can. In Shiki's case yes, she only needed two (Yin and Yang) and this in turn played a huge role in shaping her character along with her origin of nothingness. When you used the word "nurturing" a couple posts back, that really helped it click for me that it wasn't just the initial tampering process that the Ryougi clan used to try to elicit their desired outcome. It wasn't explicitly stated in the movies, but did Shiki end up leaving her clan? Or did they abandon her because she no longer had SHIKI inside her? I'm not entirely sure on that because while she does live apart from her family, her servant brings her the sword in the fifth movie. ronri said: Just a little side-tracking here: to vouch for Mikiya in some degree, and to dispel the typical lovey-dovey perception.... despite the fact that Mikiya only seemingly cared for Shiki because he simply "loved" her with no other rational reason, Movie 2 actually omitted one specific line at the end of the film from the novel, a line that would have spelled it out more easily for the general audience. Despite the fact that Mikiya claims that he had no rational reason for loving her, in the end after the 2-year time skip he came to realize that he was actually lying after all (this was mainly inferred in the films as opposed to actually being spelled out to the viewer). In the end, he came to understand how much he cares for Shiki's fragile existence (her overall mental instability), and he wanted to be the one to help and care for her and fill in that empty spot she needs due to her self-imposed state of loneliness. What you ought to realize is despite the seeming attraction that Shiki might have inherently held (cute girl, traditional style clothing, holding a sense of mystique due to being an enigma in the eyes of many), she was very snobbish before she met and grew closer to Mikiya, and a lot of people were frightened of her attitude and overall demeanor, coupled with her reputation for being part of a very rich and conservative family (coincidentally, it's why she was so cruel towards Lio despite the guy honestly and nicely just asking her out). By keeping up that lie regarding his sense of romanticism, he's able to maintain that sense of stability that Shiki so desperately needs, and it's this caring and unchanging nature that really attracted Shiki towards Mikiya and why she appreciates him so much. That's VERY interesting. I didn't catch that at all. I got the impression that the other kids at her school were wary of her because she generally seemed to be cold and aloof, but I figured that her lack of sociability was because of her inner turmoil, rather than her family's status or snobbishness. She didn't seem snobbish to me. Was that something that was more clearly expressed in the novels? Or did it just go over my head? I do think the part about Mikiya could tie in to that he loves Shiki, but more in the caring/compassion aspect of love than the passion/romantic aspect. I think you'd have to care a great deal about someone to want to be for them what Mikiya wanted to be for Shiki. But, I agree with you that that's not really a lovey-dovey type of thing. ronri said: What I really appreciate about our discussion is that at least now I have something to refer to (be it recollection or relating information) whenever I need to recall and talk about these things again, and the level of organization you brought onto this along with the confirmation of the details on my part really helped in laying it all down so coherently before my eyes unlike anything I've done on my own before. I thank you for the enlightening discussion, even with Kara no Kyoukai's critical acclaim, it's hard to find people who are actually interested in (or needless to say, even remotely capable of understanding) these more philosophical aspects of the series, and it's discussions like these that make me truly appreciate the work and the kind of discussion it brings. So again, thanks for that. ^_^ You're very welcome! I tend to approach gaining knowledge and understanding like a pyramid: before anything else, you have to have a very solid foundation. If you have a weak foundation, anything you try to build on top of it will be shaky and prone to collapsing. But if you go step-by-step, layer-by-layer, you can develop a very thorough understanding of just about anything. I think that's why I'm so methodical. I do think that some things can help a person understand something more easily. I think prior knowledge is a huge help. For instance, I have an interest in internal martial arts, through which I've learned a little bit about Taiji theory. I've also taken many, many classes in psychology. Without that background (especially the basic knowledge of Taiji theory), I think I would have had a much more difficult time understanding a good deal of what we've discussed. Also immensely helpful is having someone to discuss with and bounce ideas off of and check your work, so to speak. So, thank you for that. ^_^ That tangent aside, I'm really glad that I've had the chance to have this discussion with you. It's been wonderfully enlightening and enjoyable. =) |
Jul 7, 2013 12:13 AM
#130
Something was nagging me in the back of my head, so I went researched it again just to be sure and it seems I made a minor mistake. Aside from that, I'll also address your questions (spoiler-tagging!) Sejin said: It wasn't explicitly stated in the movies, but did Shiki end up leaving her clan? Or did they abandon her because she no longer had SHIKI inside her? I'm not entirely sure on that because while she does live apart from her family, her servant brings her the sword in the fifth movie. Shiki imposed a sort of "exile" upon herself because she actually felt bad that she wasn't able to succeed as the next heir for the family due to the incident and what happened to SHIKI. While it's never explicitly stated, I think her family felt bad for her. So despite the fact that she left her household of her own accord (living in a small apartment room not too far from her house), Akitaka still comes to visit her for general needs/errands (taking out her clothes for washing etc.) Sejin said: That's VERY interesting. I didn't catch that at all. I got the impression that the other kids at her school were wary of her because she generally seemed to be cold and aloof, but I figured that her lack of sociability was because of her inner turmoil, rather than her family's status or snobbishness. She didn't seem snobbish to me. Was that something that was more clearly expressed in the novels? Or did it just go over my head? It's not too obvious, but it was definitely implied by Mikiya's friend Gakuto and how the school supposedly viewed her not to mention the way she turned down Lio was somewhat harsh ("I don't like weak people"). That said, her lack of sociability is indeed caused by her inner turmoil, to the point that it's arguable that she does it on impulse due to the very fact that she doesn't want anyone to find out about her other personality (be it out of concern for or how others might be frightened of her). Sejin said: I do think the part about Mikiya could tie in to that he loves Shiki, but more in the caring/compassion aspect of love than the passion/romantic aspect. I think you'd have to care a great deal about someone to want to be for them what Mikiya wanted to be for Shiki. But, I agree with you that that's not really a lovey-dovey type of thing. Oh definitely! Rather I just wanted to point out that his love is also functional in the sense that it isn't just blind infatuation (a common mistake that a lot of people seem to make which really puzzles me) but rather that he actually truly cares for Shiki's well-being. That said, I intend to mention a mistake that I made in the previous post. I have come to realize (and I have confirmed this through the novel), that the Ryougi family specifically tampers and nurtures their heir to be able to develop specifically TWO personalities. That said, by default in most cases, two is enough to drive anyone crazy apparently based on the way they are brought up to accept such a trait. But Shiki remains a unique case due to her having the origin of "Nothingness" (representing the Wuji). In turn, Shiki was able to cope with having two personalities (even if momentarily before she needed Mikiya's help) due to the very nature of her origin and her murderous impulse becoming a point of focus for both personalities. In that regard, anyone who also has the origin of nothingness can only truly maintain their sanity through the use of multiple personalities to cope with the pressure (two in this case, so as to create the necessary Wuji-Taiji relationship for the person to continually function). So in the end, the relationship remains mutual and almost symbiotic (just as we discussed), and whatever else issues Shiki had about her murderous impulse was cushioned through Mikiya's care. Sejin said: I do think that some things can help a person understand something more easily. I think prior knowledge is a huge help. For instance, I have an interest in internal martial arts, through which I've learned a little bit about Taiji theory. I've also taken many, many classes in psychology. Without that background (especially the basic knowledge of Taiji theory), I think I would have had a much more difficult time understanding a good deal of what we've discussed. Also immensely helpful is having someone to discuss with and bounce ideas off of and check your work, so to speak. So, thank you for that. ^_^ Haha fair enough. On my part, I've studied a bit of basic psychology, religion (and some of the philosophical implications behind them), social/political science, film, as well as legal studies in that regard. Most of the aforementioned subjects I'm no expert at but am definitely interested enough to know a thing or two. Hence why I was pleasantly surprised to find KNK which was like finding a treasure trove that mixes most of said subjects that I liked. XD |
Jul 7, 2013 4:13 PM
#131
Okay, thanks for clearing that up! ronri said: That said, I intend to mention a mistake that I made in the previous post. I have come to realize (and I have confirmed this through the novel), that the Ryougi family specifically tampers and nurtures their heir to be able to develop specifically TWO personalities. That said, by default in most cases, two is enough to drive anyone crazy apparently based on the way they are brought up to accept such a trait. But Shiki remains a unique case due to her having the origin of "Nothingness" (representing the Wuji). In turn, Shiki was able to cope with having two personalities (even if momentarily before she needed Mikiya's help) due to the very nature of her origin and her murderous impulse becoming a point of focus for both personalities. In that regard, anyone who also has the origin of nothingness can only truly maintain their sanity through the use of multiple personalities to cope with the pressure (two in this case, so as to create the necessary Wuji-Taiji relationship for the person to continually function). So in the end, the relationship remains mutual and almost symbiotic (just as we discussed), and whatever else issues Shiki had about her murderous impulse was cushioned through Mikiya's care. Thinking about that raised some questions in my mind about the specifics of the whole tampering/nurturing bit. Since a person naturally develops a single personality, does the Ryougi clan add a second, ready-made one? Or do they completely override the person's original personality with two ready-made ones? Or do they let the person's single personality develop, but manipulate it in such as way as to lead to it splitting into two personalities? I'm not talking specifically about Shiki's case, but about how it's done in general. I remember you saying that the specifics aren't touched that heavily upon, even in the novels, but trying to fit this new information in with what I already know raised those questions, which I'm hoping you can answer. Thanks! |
Jul 9, 2013 12:28 PM
#132
Pardon the delay, was really busy but I can definitely confirm this. Sejin said: Thinking about that raised some questions in my mind about the specifics of the whole tampering/nurturing bit. Since a person naturally develops a single personality, does the Ryougi clan add a second, ready-made one? Or do they completely override the person's original personality with two ready-made ones? Or do they let the person's single personality develop, but manipulate it in such as way as to lead to it splitting into two personalities? I'm not talking specifically about Shiki's case, but about how it's done in general. I remember you saying that the specifics aren't touched that heavily upon, even in the novels, but trying to fit this new information in with what I already know raised those questions, which I'm hoping you can answer. The one highlighted in bold is the correct one. The very nature of a person's personality (or the two personalities in this regard) is not really pre-determined beyond the fact that they tend to view the second personality as being the opposite gender to their own (in this case, since Shiki is female, they designated her second personality as "masculine" by default). She does claim that the very nature of her personalities Shiki and SHIKI somehow, through unknown means and circumstances, managed to coexist instead of driving her insane like her ancestors. While she attributes it to the very nature of her personalities as the potential reason (as she claims that they "ignore" each other while retaining self-awareness and order), this is definitely the connection that we've been talking about in regards as to how she developed two specific personalities (closed off and impulsive) in light of her origin of nothingness, forming a Wuji-Taiji relationship with the "third" personality. I hope that answers your question! ^_^ |
Jul 9, 2013 7:22 PM
#133
Thanks! That did help. Sorry if my previous post came off as abrupt. I was in a hurry while typing it. I'm confused about something. You confirmed that the Ryougi clan lets their heir's original personality develop, but nurtures it in such a way as to lead to their personality splitting. Doesn't that mean that the clan doesn't do anything with inserting a personality from the outside (what I thought you meant when you used the word "tampering" in regard to the Ryougi clan's customs)? If so, that contradicts what Shiki's body's personality said in the epilogue about the Ryougi clan trying to insert ready-made personalities into Shiki from the outside, resulting in her body gaining sentience. The two ideas seem mutually exclusive. The only work-around I could come up with was that the attempted insertion of various personalities into Shiki's body was done intentionally, with the purpose of making her body sentient. But that would imply that they knew that doing that to Shiki's body would make it live, which means that they wouldn't need to do it to every heir, just to any heir who was stillborn. But that contradicts that it's a custom that they do to all the heirs. And now I'm really confused.... o.o |
Jul 10, 2013 1:50 AM
#134
Sejin said: I'm confused about something. You confirmed that the Ryougi clan lets their heir's original personality develop, but nurtures it in such a way as to lead to their personality splitting. Doesn't that mean that the clan doesn't do anything with inserting a personality from the outside (what I thought you meant when you used the word "tampering" in regard to the Ryougi clan's customs)? If so, that contradicts what Shiki's body's personality said in the epilogue about the Ryougi clan trying to insert ready-made personalities into Shiki from the outside, resulting in her body gaining sentience. Actually this is the vague part. Due to Shiki herself (not the third personality, but how she and the Ryougi family probably understand it) being an unreliable narrator (since even Touko claims that they don't really understand everything that they're doing with their magic), I can only deduce that it's not so much that the personalities had pre-determined attributes, but rather they insert read-made personalities in the sense of creating base personalities through nurture and tampering with the body, allowing each respective personality to develop on their own. The fact that her parents and Shiki herself weren't entirely sure of how/why she stayed sane seems indicative of their obliviousness to how it all even works. I highly doubt that they could "form" complete personalities on their own, rather I can see them tampering with Shiki's body so as to provide a more general template to allow the mind to form the attitudes/traits of each personality on its own. I actually doubt that the Ryougi clan were keenly aware of Shiki's origin of nothingness and really wanted to exploit them, the fact that they can barely even understand their own methods/customs shows their level of ignorance despite their abilities. XD |
ronriJul 10, 2013 2:01 AM
Jul 10, 2013 7:13 PM
#135
Thanks. That helped a lot! Spoiler-tagging, to keep length down. I'm still not sure if I have a firm grasp on it, but after thinking about it and trying to put it in my own words to help myself understand it better, this is what I came up with: The Ryougi clan has a custom of using magic on their heir's body to influence the development of the person's personality in the mind in such a way that will more likely lead to their desired outcome. This is supplemented by nurturing and raising the heir in such a way as to further increase the likelihood of this happening successfully. In Shiki's case, in addition to its typical effects, the use of magic on her body also somehow made it sentient and forced life and a will to keep living onto it. ronri said: I actually doubt that the Ryougi clan were keenly aware of Shiki's origin of nothingness and really wanted to exploit them, the fact that they can barely even understand their own methods/customs shows their level of ignorance despite their abilities. XD So, then, is it safe to assume that the Ryougi clan only knew that Shiki was stillborn, but not the reason for it? And is Shiki's body's personality the only one that is aware that Shiki's origin is nothingness? From his dialogue in the fifth movie, it seems pretty certain that Araya knew (although, he's dead by the time of the epilogue, so he sorta doesn't count). Does Touko know? Could the fact that Araya knew about Shiki's origin be because of his expertise and experience in dealing with the soul as the means of reaching the Akashic records? Also, does the novel ever say at what point the Ryougi clan uses their magic on their heir (e.g., is it after the child is born, or while they're still in the womb, or some other time?)? This is kinda unrelated, but I'm curious since you referenced the novel to make sure about the number of personalities that the Ryougi heirs develop. I would guess that you're fluent in Japanese since you're making your own subtitles for the movies. So, do you have the original Japanese novels, or do you have a translated version? |
Jul 10, 2013 8:23 PM
#136
No problem! (spoiler-tagging as well) Sejin said: The Ryougi clan has a custom of using magic on their heir's body to influence the development of the person's personality in the mind in such a way that will more likely lead to their desired outcome. This is supplemented by nurturing and raising the heir in such a way as to further increase the likelihood of this happening successfully. In Shiki's case, in addition to its typical effects, the use of magic on her body also somehow made it sentient and forced life and a will to keep living onto it. Sejin said: Exactly this. Sejin said: So, then, is it safe to assume that the Ryougi clan only knew that Shiki was stillborn, but not the reason for it? Sejin said: Yes, this is pretty much what I think was the limit of their understanding of it. Sejin said: And is Shiki's body's personality the only one that is aware that Shiki's origin is nothingness? From his dialogue in the fifth movie, it seems pretty certain that Araya knew (although, he's dead by the time of the epilogue, so he sorta doesn't count). Does Touko know? Could the fact that Araya knew about Shiki's origin be because of his expertise and experience in dealing with the soul as the means of reaching the Akashic records? It's greatly inferred that Araya and Touko were somewhat aware of it hence their overall association and fascination with Shiki. While they may not have been keenly aware of a "sentient" third personality, it's very likely that they knew of her origin of nothingness. Sejin said: Also, does the novel ever say at what point the Ryougi clan uses their magic on their heir (e.g., is it after the child is born, or while they're still in the womb, or some other time?)? I recall that the epilogue may have mentioned that it starts as early as the child being in the womb but I might have to double-check on that one. Sejin said: This is kinda unrelated, but I'm curious since you referenced the novel to make sure about the number of personalities that the Ryougi heirs develop. I would guess that you're fluent in Japanese since you're making your own subtitles for the movies. So, do you have the original Japanese novels, or do you have a translated version? Haha, I honestly wouldn't say I'm fluent in Japanese, but I do have some basic understanding of certain phrases/words based on general experience, enough to notice certain inconsistencies/errors in some of the translations. That said, my referral to the novel was based on past readings of people's interpretations as well as the English translation that one keen fan had thankfully released for all to get an idea of the original novel (I believe you may have found the link already in one of your previous posts?). |
Jul 11, 2013 6:26 PM
#137
Thanks for confirming all the stuff about the clan's customs for me! It really helps me understand it! ronri said: Haha, I honestly wouldn't say I'm fluent in Japanese, but I do have some basic understanding of certain phrases/words based on general experience, enough to notice certain inconsistencies/errors in some of the translations. That said, my referral to the novel was based on past readings of people's interpretations as well as the English translation that one keen fan had thankfully released for all to get an idea of the original novel (I believe you may have found the link already in one of your previous posts?). So, then, are these the same translations you've read? Sorry I don't have much to say this time. I'm in the process of typing out all this stuff we've been talking about over the past weeks, putting it together into a coherent and more-or-less comprehensive form based on my understanding of Kara no Kyoukai, although I'm sure I'll be making modifications as I keep at it, especially after I read the novels. Would you be willing to check my homework, so to speak, when I'm done with the initial draft? EDIT: Nevermind, I've got more to say. :P Although, would you still be willing to have a look at my initial draft once I'm done with it? Spoiler-tagging! In thinking about Shiki post-accident, I came up with an equation of sorts to help me understand all the mental balancing that Shiki had to do. I was hoping you'd give it a look and see if you think it makes sense. I'm going to use blue- and red-colored fonts when talking about the numerical values I assign to a personality and to the pull of a person's origin, respectively. I'm not trying to explicitly or implicitly state that the numbers are anything absolute. They're just to help with my understanding. Also, I know I'm using the colors red and blue again, but this is entirely separate from my gauge metaphor. Anyways: A personality has a value of 1. Normally, the pull of a person's origin has a value of 1. In a normal person, the two essentially cancel each other out. Let's give that a value of 0. In addition, let's say that 0 means the person is able to live a normal life. So, a normal person has a value of 0. In the case of the vast majority of Ryougi clan heirs, they have 2-1=1. That 1 is enough to cause them to eventually become insane. In Shiki's case, her origin's stronger pull gives it a higher value. So, with her, you have something like 2-1.5=.5. This .5 still results in her being mentally unstable, but not nearly as much as the Ryougi heirs normally are. For the most part, she's able to compensate well enough by organizing her mental activity and interactions with the outside world in a certain way. Then you have the accident. After the accident, SHIKI was gone. So now, for Shiki, you have something like 1-1.5=-.5. This is where Mikiya comes in. His care and support provide the .5 to negate the effects of the pull of Shiki's origin. Shiki herself is still somewhat mentally unstable, but with Mikiya being there for her, she is able to successfully resist her murderous impulses, effectively having a value of 0. Thus, with Mikiya, she's able to live a normal life. I hope that doesn't sound too odd. It was just the way I came up with to help make sense of the tug-of-war of sorts between Shiki and the pull of her origin, and how she had to deal with it differently after SHIKI was gone. Also, I find it interesting that, IF my math analogy is more-or-less accurate, Shiki had to learn to deal with her origin's pull differently after her accident, learning to rely on someone else where, before, she'd done it all internally in her own mind. |
SejinJul 11, 2013 7:39 PM
Jul 15, 2013 7:59 AM
#138
I apologize for the VERY late reply, I've been marathoning a whole slew of anime and various video games. While I saw that you replied a few days back, with so many other stories I was focusing on from other anime and video games, I had to clear my mind and tune back to KNK before I could sit down and properly absorb your write-up. That said, I finally read it aaaand spoiler-tagging again! Indeed that's the same link, kind of a shame because I'd have wanted to see the same person translate DDD which is another novel by Nasu which he had written around the time of KNK's film release. Thing is though, it seemed with the emergence of other Type-Moon stuff the person seemed to ignore DDD in favor of more popular titles. Reason why I'm curious is because Nasu hasn't really written much stuff akin to the formatting of KNK (novel formatting that is) yet out of nowhere he seemed to be interested enough to write something new despite claiming to have abandoned said formatting ever since KNK (I'd say he was probably inspired by the KNK film releases to write such stories once again). That said, DDD definitely has that creepy yet introspective vibe in the same vein as KNK (only in this case it focuses on the reality of psychopathy/mental illness vs "actual" supernatural demons) and it's why I was disappointed to hear that the person may have abandoned the idea of translating. =/ Sejin said: A personality has a value of 1. Normally, the pull of a person's origin has a value of 1. In a normal person, the two essentially cancel each other out. Let's give that a value of 0. In addition, let's say that 0 means the person is able to live a normal life. So, a normal person has a value of 0. In the case of the vast majority of Ryougi clan heirs, they have 2-1=1. That 1 is enough to cause them to eventually become insane. In Shiki's case, her origin's stronger pull gives it a higher value. So, with her, you have something like 2-1.5=.5. This .5 still results in her being mentally unstable, but not nearly as much as the Ryougi heirs normally are. For the most part, she's able to compensate well enough by organizing her mental activity and interactions with the outside world in a certain way. Really interesting way of putting it and I'd say you're definitely spot-on here! And I agree with the use of the ".5" and it makes sense in context of how Shiki is still mentally unstable despite not being as utterly susceptible to losing her mind as did the previous heirs of the Ryougi family. Sejin said: Then you have the accident. After the accident, SHIKI was gone. So now, for Shiki, you have something like 1-1.5=-.5. This is where Mikiya comes in. His care and support provide the .5 to negate the effects of the pull of Shiki's origin. Shiki herself is still somewhat mentally unstable, but with Mikiya being there for her, she is able to successfully resist her murderous impulses, effectively having a value of 0. Thus, with Mikiya, she's able to live a normal life. I love how this equation narrows down to how the value becomes 0 (normal in this case) as I was curious how you'd go about outlining her character's final developments and surely enough, you did not disappoint. Great job overall, I must say that you really nailed the idea behind her characterization in light of the revelations in the Epilogue and your equation actually works in context of it all. Sejin said: I hope that doesn't sound too odd. It was just the way I came up with to help make sense of the tug-of-war of sorts between Shiki and the pull of her origin, and how she had to deal with it differently after SHIKI was gone. Also, I find it interesting that, IF my math analogy is more-or-less accurate, Shiki had to learn to deal with her origin's pull differently after her accident, learning to rely on someone else where, before, she'd done it all internally in her own mind. Great call there and yeah, it's essentially what was addressed in the 4th film especially considering how Shiki always relied on SHIKI. I'd even argue that in a way, it actually worked out for the best when you consider how of all people she could have, it was someone as caring as Mikiya, and that such a relationship actually made Shiki grow as a character more than she was possibly able to do so before. Also, I really enjoy our discussions and I didn't find this odd at all! Actually I find it a shame that not many people discuss (or even able to) about KNK in such depth like this (both in the philosophy and its relation and implications to the characters and their development), especially in the case of the Type-Moon fandom. If anything I appreciate the level of enthusiasm on your part. =D |
ronriJul 15, 2013 8:04 AM
Jul 16, 2013 7:44 PM
#139
ronri said: I apologize for the VERY late reply, I've been marathoning a whole slew of anime and various video games. While I saw that you replied a few days back, with so many other stories I was focusing on from other anime and video games, I had to clear my mind and tune back to KNK before I could sit down and properly absorb your write-up. That said, I finally read it aaaand spoiler-tagging again! It's all good. I know how that is. When I first started discussing Kara no Kyoukai with you, for those first several posts back and forth, because I was still trying to piece a lot of the foundational stuff together, I banned myself from watching anything (anime or otherwise) that I would have had to put much thought into because I didn't want to lose focus and have things from other anime or movies confusing or distracting me, or otherwise working their way into my head. Spoiler-tagging to keep length down (well, sorta--it doesn't actually reduce the length of the post). :P I'm curious about what anime you've been watching. I don't want to go too off-topic on this thread, so would you be okay with me messaging you about that? What does DDD stand for? The description you gave sounds very intriguing. ronri said: Great call there and yeah, it's essentially what was addressed in the 4th film especially considering how Shiki always relied on SHIKI. I'd even argue that in a way, it actually worked out for the best when you consider how of all people she could have, it was someone as caring as Mikiya, and that such a relationship actually made Shiki grow as a character more than she was possibly able to do so before. I kinda got the impression that, as far as relationships go, it was either Mikiya (or maybe someone very similar to him) or nobody. As you said before, Shiki was very aloof, and even though all of her classmates were curious about or interested in her, they were all too intimidated to try to approach her. And Shiki obviously had no desire to approach them. It seemed to me like, if Shiki had wanted to, she could have blown off Mikiya just like everyone else (and she did completely ignore him at one point). To me that implied that, for them to have started a relationship in the first place, Shiki would have had to have taken an interest in Mikiya; she wouldn't have acquiesced to him just because he was persistent. All of that leads me to think it was more that she had Mikiya instead of nobody, rather than that she had Mikiya instead of somebody else. ronri said: Also, I really enjoy our discussions and I didn't find this odd at all! Actually I find it a shame that not many people discuss (or even able to) about KNK in such depth like this (both in the philosophy and its relation and implications to the characters and their development), especially in the case of the Type-Moon fandom. If anything I appreciate the level of enthusiasm on your part. =D Kara no Kyoukai definitely struck several cords within me, especially since I've been discussing it with you and gaining more insight and understanding about it as a result. I, too, am very glad that I can discuss it like this with you. ^_^ The only other Type-Moon creation that I've seen is Fate/Stay Night, which I know is based on a visual novel that has at least a couple others tied in with it (Fate/Zero and Fate/Heaven's Feel are the ones I remember--I THINK; I don't know anything about them, I've just heard the names). I know that they made an anime adaptation of Fate/Zero, which I've heard is very good. It and Tsukihime are on my list of anime to watch. Even though it's been a long time since I last saw Fate/Stay Night, I remember I thought it was pretty good. But, that pales in comparison to how much I like Kara no Kyoukai. |
SejinJul 16, 2013 7:50 PM
Jul 24, 2013 10:08 PM
#140
I think it's downright criminal of me not to have replied to you earlier but I've been really busy with my personal life (mostly due to the start of a new school term) so I haven't had time to properly reply. Spoiler-tagging again! Sejin said: I'm curious about what anime you've been watching. I don't want to go too off-topic on this thread, so would you be okay with me messaging you about that? You can easily find my most recently finished anime on my profile here actually. While I can't say that I can easily divulge on my thoughts on all of them as much as I normally can for KNK, I'm more than willing to engage in more fun discussions (just message me about any of them if you wish) Sejin said: What does DDD stand for? The description you gave sounds very intriguing. It stands for "Decoration Disorder Disconnection". There's very little info about it (unfortunately), and the most you'll find can be found in the Type-Moon wiki: http://typemoon.wikia.com/wiki/DDD Sejin said: I kinda got the impression that, as far as relationships go, it was either Mikiya (or maybe someone very similar to him) or nobody. As you said before, Shiki was very aloof, and even though all of her classmates were curious about or interested in her, they were all too intimidated to try to approach her. And Shiki obviously had no desire to approach them. It seemed to me like, if Shiki had wanted to, she could have blown off Mikiya just like everyone else (and she did completely ignore him at one point). To me that implied that, for them to have started a relationship in the first place, Shiki would have had to have taken an interest in Mikiya; she wouldn't have acquiesced to him just because he was persistent. All of that leads me to think it was more that she had Mikiya instead of nobody, rather than that she had Mikiya instead of somebody else. I have no disagreements here whatsoever (especially that last sentence), and I'd like clear up my (badly) phrased post from before by saying that you voiced my own thoughts rather clearly in this new post. Sejin said: Kara no Kyoukai definitely struck several cords within me, especially since I've been discussing it with you and gaining more insight and understanding about it as a result. I, too, am very glad that I can discuss it like this with you. ^_^ The only other Type-Moon creation that I've seen is Fate/Stay Night, which I know is based on a visual novel that has at least a couple others tied in with it (Fate/Zero and Fate/Heaven's Feel are the ones I remember--I THINK; I don't know anything about them, I've just heard the names). I know that they made an anime adaptation of Fate/Zero, which I've heard is very good. It and Tsukihime are on my list of anime to watch. Even though it's been a long time since I last saw Fate/Stay Night, I remember I thought it was pretty good. But, that pales in comparison to how much I like Kara no Kyoukai. I will say right now that I personally have a bigger preference for Kara no Kyoukai over any of Type-Moon's other works. This is especially in the case of the Fate franchise in which I simply have a hard time stomaching the notion of having such an arbitrary rule system that bears little relevance and significance to the themes and ideas within the work all while attempting proper story and character arcs. While Fate/Zero does a great job of alleviating said established rule system by actually factoring it into the narrative with thematic meaning and symbolism (thus enhancing the story), I don't think I can easily say the same for the rest of the Fate franchise. In that regard, as much as I can enjoy Type-Moon's works, I'm being honest when I say I'm more of a "Kara no Kyoukai fan" than a full-fledged "Type-Moon fan". This is all based on personal preference of course, but it should give you an indication as to why I rever Nasu's work in KNK so much in the first place. That said, I think it's fair to warn you that it's best to stay away from the current Fate/Stay Night anime adaptation as it was apparently such a horrible adaptation (the same could be said for the infamous anime adaptation of Tsukihime in which many have normall joke about its supposed non-existence). In that regard, I highly recommend that you try out Fate/Zero. Not only is it written by Gen Urobochi (with Nasu's direction) in which he his past works include Puella Magi Madoka Magica and Psycho-Pass among others, but also because of the fact that the animation studio and soundtrack behind it are the same the ones that made the KNK films. Personally, I find it to be a great deconstruction of the hero and anti-hero archetype (namely in the case of the two protagonists Emiya Kiritsugu and Saber). One other aspect I like (and not many people seem to take note of this) is that it provides an interesting case where the main antagonist is actually depicted as merely starting out in his character arc in which he could easily be treated as being one of the protagonist. In stark contrast, the main protagonist (Emiya Kiritsugu) is a complete character, whereby his character progression is more to do with how he is taken apart as opposed to building new material. While I wouldn't say it's the masterpiece that Kara no Kyoukai was, I'd say it's definitely an amazing experience in its own right (not to mention, very randomly Cornelius Alba gets a cameo in which he is shown in his younger years before his depiction in KNK Movie 5). You're actually lucky in the sense that it has recently been announced that an adaptation of the most lauded route of the original Fate/Stay Night Visual Novel (specifically "Heaven's Feel") will actually be made by the same team behind Fate/Zero and the KNK films. So only time will tell in terms of how well they'll pull it off. ;) |
ronriJul 24, 2013 10:17 PM
Jul 25, 2013 6:22 PM
#141
ronri said: I think it's downright criminal of me not to have replied to you earlier but I've been really busy with my personal life (mostly due to the start of a new school term) so I haven't had time to properly reply. Spoiler-tagging again! It's all good. You don't need to be so hard on yourself for it. =) I didn't read all of what was on the page you linked me to, but it sounds interesting. I'll read the rest of it later. I laughed at first when I saw that they were calling demonic possession Abnormal Antagonist Syndrome. To me it sounded like they were trying to make something that's not uncommon in literature and anime sound sophisticated. Then, after more reading, I began to realize that that's probably not quite what they were getting at. It was a pleasant realization because that's a more interesting idea to me than simply making demonic possession sound smart. Also, with the large number of characters listed, I have to wonder if the story feels cluttered. Thanks for all the info about all the Fate/ stuff! Honestly, I'm only marginally interested in all of it, so I don't really have much to say in response other than what I've already said. Like you, I'm currently more of just a Kara no Kyoukai fan myself. (I know I could more easily write KNK, but the full name just sounds so cool! :P) |
Aug 11, 2013 2:42 AM
#142
That was soooo deep.... so **** deep as water in my sink. Sadly I disliked whole Knk series. |
Aug 15, 2013 12:16 PM
#143
Highly philosophical piece, supported with breathtaking scenery In contrast to the other 7 movies, this would be boring and non action packed It's good that it wasn't a long piece with only two people talking to each other the entire time |
Aug 19, 2013 6:28 PM
#144
The dialogue from this epilogue was philosophical but it could've been summed up in 5-10 minutes. There were a few instances where Shiki summed up the entire epilogue in a TL;DR version and dragging this on for 30 minutes was unnecessary. Aside from that the voice acting was soothing and I still gave it an 8/10 because it really makes you think. Either you find it boring or philosophical. Depends on the viewer. |
Oct 18, 2013 6:41 PM
#145
The dialogue does mention alot, but as others said, it could be summed, and more "explaining" instead of "thats deep stuff". Also, that was no dialogue. A dialogue/conversation means, two or more people talk. One says something, the other one does answer/comment on that etc. But here, Mikyia had like what, five lines? Well, maybe five in that one long expllation, and another five in the rest of the time. It also had almost no music or animation, and 30 mins the same background, even when it's indeed pretty..so overall, more disappointing than helpful or anything. |
Nov 28, 2013 5:18 PM
#146
I've never been so bored for a half an hour. Seriously, it was painful. A philosophical monologue about existentialism made so boring you could use it as insomnia solution. I usually like that stuff (I'm all over GitS) so I can't believe I almost fell asleep with this. It's not surprising though, Shiki just keeps on repeating the same things over and over when once would've taken 5-10 mins tops, and Kokutou just stands there like a tree. It wasn't just boring, but pretentious as hell (granted I feel that way for quite some scenes in the whole series, but they're outweighted by the rest of the stuff). Talk about disappointing. My reaction is mostly because I had my expectations in something else, I guess. I had many questions as to what Aozaki's actual goal to help Shiki was, why her eyes are important to the origin thing the mages were pursuing, what Kokutou's role was besides a love interest, if magic is a secret why is the sister and the school she goes to so nonchalantly accepting of it (seriously that damaged my suspension of disbelief like nothing else), why Shiki's family wanted to breed her as a superior human... etc etc etc. All things that could've been at least addressed but they chose a boring monologue as epilogue. For me this series peaked in the 5th movie, when everything and everyone finally seemed to have part of a bigger picture (except Kokutou lol). I wish the guy with the red hat and Araya had more character development though. NwAurion said: that was no dialogue. A dialogue/conversation means, two or more people talk. One says something, the other one does answer/comment on that etc. But here, Mikyia had like what, five lines? Thank god I'm not the only who thought that, Mikiya could as well been a cardboard cut out for how much presence he had in this "conversation." Krunchy said: That was soooo deep.... so **** deep as water in my sink. So not really deep at all. My thoughts exactly! |
YakuriNov 28, 2013 5:28 PM
Nov 28, 2013 9:03 PM
#147
Yakuri said: My reaction is mostly because I had my expectations in something else, I guess. I had many questions as to what Aozaki's actual goal to help Shiki was, why her eyes are important to the origin thing the mages were pursuing, what Kokutou's role was besides a love interest, if magic is a secret why is the sister and the school she goes to so nonchalantly accepting of it (seriously that damaged my suspension of disbelief like nothing else), why Shiki's family wanted to breed her as a superior human... etc etc etc. All things that could've been at least addressed but they chose a boring monologue as epilogue. I won't even lie, but it sounds more like you didn't even pay attention to the rest of the series considering the questions you've outlined here (majority of which was actually inferred or blatantly outlined throughout the series). I don't expect anyone to fully grasp the full implications of the Epilogue considering how it refers to a number of religious concepts that not many people know about (again, not as "pretentious" as you and so many claim) in order to be able to fully relate them to the character arcs within the story, but the fact that you missed out on such key parts within the series is somewhat indicative of how little you truly cared/paid attention. Also it's pretty unfair to judge a work based on your own personal expectations when you consider how such expectations are brought on by yourself (let's not forget the fact that this is simply epilogue and not a full-blown entry in the series). Again, "pretentious" is greatly misused by so many people that many tend forget that the word is defined as being "characterized by assumption of dignity or importance, especially when exaggerated or undeserved". I don't see how Kara no Kyoukai even comes across as that when it simply uses basic religious concepts to emphasize certain character arcs within the story, far from being "pretentious" (i.e. assuming undeserved/exaggerated dignity or importance) when it actually goes out of its way to outline the intended symbolism and purpose behind its use of such ideas. Let's begin in addressing these questions then: 1) Aozaki's goal - There's no outlined goal but the fact that it's established that she hired Shiki to work for the Garannodou Agency implies a form of investigation on her part. To spell it out - she's investigating and cleaning up various paranormal incidents that are suddenly popping up within the city (i.e. the stuff caused by Araya). It's also heavily implied that Touko simply took interest towards Shiki from a Magus's standpoint; in which her Mystic Eyes of Death Perception drew her interest. 2) Why Shiki's eyes are important - one of the biggest oversights considering how this was one of the driving forces of what made your favorite film tick. Let's look at the name, "Mystic Eyes of Death Perception". Again, "Death Perception". This implies a perception and understanding of the concept of death and mortality. It was outlined that due to Shiki's near-death experience, she held a direct connection to the very origins of the world, hence why she even had the ability through her eyes in the first place. Touko blatantly said in Movie 5 that Magi have long sought out the Origin of the world, ergo the fact that Shiki has a direct connection to it means she's a blatant target for rogue Magi such as Araya who wish to seek out and reach said Origin through illegal and radical means. 3) Kokutou's role: Seriously, the second main character and you couldn't even bother with grasping what his role was beyond simply dismissing him as a simple love interest? Kokutou served as a focal point in Shiki's life and inner desire for a sense of normalcy, something that is ultimately fulfilled in the end when it finally came down to pushing her to the edge of her self-imposed mentality as a killer. Need something else beyond his connection to Shiki? How about providing a different moral compass to contrast against the pragmatic Touko, and the destructively impulsive Shiki? How about his ever-changing ability to adapt, his unrelenting conviction and kindness, all of which that helped in shaping many of various film protagonist's views (Shiki, Tomoe, Azaka) and greatly influenced a number of antagonist's mentality and eventual defeat (Kirie, Fujino, Lio)? Again, to dismiss Kokutou as nothing but a simple love interest is a bit misguided considering how he subtly (and even blatantly) played such a huge role throughout the entire series (further emphasized in the Epilogue when his very influence and existence was described as mending the destructible inevitability of Shiki's fate, hence why the Origin offered him the chance to regain his sight from his missing eye as a form of gift/thanksgiving). From a naively love-struck student to someone who constantly revised his mentality for those around him with a strong mind, just because Kokutou isn't presented as a depressing character that needs to be sympathized with by the audience, it doesn't make his character any less human or someone that one could relate to at all, and the movies did a good enough job at doing just that. 4) Why is magic a secret but so "nonchalantly" accepted in Azaka's school: In no way was it ever implied that magic was "nonchalantly" accepted in Azaka's school. Azaka blatantly said that she sought out Touko of her own will and the faeries were brought on by an outside force, a rogue Magus with connections to Araya at that. Of course, let's not forget the fact that her school is shown as being a Christian school so I have no idea where you got this idea from. 5) Why Shiki's family wanted to breed her as a superior human: This is a plot device than an actual reasoning that needed to be explored. The fact is that it's already implied that it was a radical family tradition of her family's part, a tradition that serves to emphasize the bizarre and eccentric nature that is key to Shiki's character. And despite your claims of the Epilogue not explaining this at all, it is heavily inferred in the Epilogue that Shiki's family simply did so based on old traditions of preserving their lineage's "talent" with an implied sense of arrogant superiority. So again, the Epilogue didn't need to further elaborate on such "questions" considering how most of these were already answered within the series. The fact that the Epilogue even bothered to further flesh out some of those ideas, yet you still missed them, is something that's just incomprehensible at this point. |
ronriNov 28, 2013 10:10 PM
More topics from this board
» Question about Garden of Sinners movie 8MarkVijet - Jan 27, 2022 |
3 |
by MarkVijet
»»
Jun 25, 2022 1:33 AM |
|
» What is this?Veethorn - Jun 23, 2010 |
9 |
by Flamestriker101
»»
Sep 26, 2020 2:57 AM |
|
» Can't find a soundtrack :(Deago - Aug 22, 2015 |
3 |
by TomDay
»»
Nov 11, 2015 7:23 PM |
|
» It's counting down. What is it?zimno - Aug 26, 2010 |
1 |
by zimno
»»
Aug 26, 2010 8:19 AM |