New
Oct 7, 4:29 AM
#51
Reply to parkles06
Tourists and normies are a cancer
@parkles06 damn bro, imagine being against pedophilia. those damn normies... |
I dislike coomers. |
Oct 7, 4:41 AM
#52
ShirikonDaichi said: These so-called people Hahaha, that's good. Very lowkey. What are they then? |
Oct 7, 4:49 AM
#53
MyllerPhiem said: @ShirikonDaichi Pls walk up to stranger elementary graders and interact with them in public. See how that goes. PS: DON'T DO THAT ffs. is that the only thing ever in any anime that would be intensely inappropriate if done irl? mr. why aren't the women being raped... I'm not completely fine with this show's premise and plot btw, but for reasons not as myopic and out of context as "middle age man talks to little girl in public and calls her his wife, this must be pedo trash". |
IhnalakoKainaOct 7, 4:55 AM
Oct 7, 5:35 AM
#54
Reply to LostSpectre
@ryzxgum Yeah, it's 100% inconclusive what his relationship will be with said elementary schooler/wife from the trailer. lmao
@LostSpectre only tourists who sexualize and kink everything would find anything in the trailer. And words like “inconclusive“ belie a twisted hope that they will find something “juicy” later. |
Oct 7, 5:40 AM
#55
Reply to MyllerPhiem
@ShirikonDaichi
Pls walk up to stranger elementary graders and interact with them in public. See how that goes.
PS: DON'T DO THAT ffs.
Pls walk up to stranger elementary graders and interact with them in public. See how that goes.
PS: DON'T DO THAT ffs.
@MyllerPhiem the funny thing is… Unlike “some people“ here… I have no problem whatsoever in differentiating between fiction and reality. And further, any turdbag who is STILL trying to cast this series as Lollicon after the first two episodes have aired obviously didn’t watch them and needs to just STFU. The show is constantly saying “don’t” |
Oct 7, 5:50 AM
#56
Reply to Dumb-Dumb
@parkles06 damn bro, imagine being against pedophilia. those damn normies...
@Dumb-Dumb why are YOU so obsessed with pedophilia? The show has nothing to do with it, but you keep bringing it up, seemingly hopeful that it does/will. Funny how the loudest anti-anythings (racists, gays, pedos) are generally just people who ARE those things and just feel guilty and self-loathing about them. |
Oct 7, 6:36 AM
#57
Reply to ShirikonDaichi
@MyllerPhiem the funny thing is… Unlike “some people“ here… I have no problem whatsoever in differentiating between fiction and reality. And further, any turdbag who is STILL trying to cast this series as Lollicon after the first two episodes have aired obviously didn’t watch them and needs to just STFU. The show is constantly saying “don’t”
@ShirikonDaichi That's the issue, though: Why "don't"? The way of the premise, it wouldn't be a problem if the husband "did". And that's the optics issue of this series. |
If you haven't watched "Fantastic Children", don't talk about "best anime". Thank you. |
Oct 7, 8:58 AM
#58
Reply to MyllerPhiem
@ShirikonDaichi That's the issue, though: Why "don't"? The way of the premise, it wouldn't be a problem if the husband "did". And that's the optics issue of this series.
@MyllerPhiem what “premise”, the one you’ve made up in your “mind”??? you’ve got some pretty f’d up perspective, and should probably stay away from fiction. |
Oct 7, 9:13 AM
#59
Reply to ShirikonDaichi
@Dumb-Dumb why are YOU so obsessed with pedophilia? The show has nothing to do with it, but you keep bringing it up, seemingly hopeful that it does/will.
Funny how the loudest anti-anythings (racists, gays, pedos) are generally just people who ARE those things and just feel guilty and self-loathing about them.
Funny how the loudest anti-anythings (racists, gays, pedos) are generally just people who ARE those things and just feel guilty and self-loathing about them.
@ShirikonDaichi Because it's disgusting to see shit like this, even if it is animated. Also you probably do want people to stop associating anime with degenerate stuff and weird and asocial people. Being against WEIRD SHIT LIKE THIS WILL HELP. |
Dumb-DumbOct 7, 9:17 AM
I dislike coomers. |
Oct 7, 1:03 PM
#60
Reply to ShirikonDaichi
@MyllerPhiem what “premise”, the one you’ve made up in your “mind”??? you’ve got some pretty f’d up perspective, and should probably stay away from fiction.
@ShirikonDaichi The premise is that she is his wife, a person with a, dunno, 40 year old mind. Again, people were giving Rudy from Mushoku Tensei shit, because he was a 40yo guy's mind in the body of an 8yo boy approaching a 10yo girl. And that criticism was fair, ofc. But what if Rudy had approach 18+ yo women? Would that have been ok? From his side? The woman would be a pedophile, ofc. Rudy? Not. And now here we have this anime where the 40yo woman is in a 10yo's body, but the adult guy she's approached isn't some stranger, but her husband. Someone who would NEVER approach young girls on his own otherwise. So per the premise of the show, why would it be an objective problem if husband and wife got intimate with each other? Just morally speaking. |
If you haven't watched "Fantastic Children", don't talk about "best anime". Thank you. |
Oct 7, 1:30 PM
#61
Reply to ShirikonDaichi
@LostSpectre only tourists who sexualize and kink everything would find anything in the trailer. And words like “inconclusive“ belie a twisted hope that they will find something “juicy” later.
@ShirikonDaichi Nah. Cope. You're beyond ignorant if you think anime of all mediums doesn't have plenty of sus premises. Also, ironic that you're using the language of people who most commonly defend sexualized children in anime. LOL |
If you reply back to me and I never respond, I lost interest and don't care. Sorry about that. |
Oct 7, 2:27 PM
#62
Oct 7, 3:28 PM
#63
MyllerPhiem said: Didn't you just agree why criticism of Rudy was right? Why do you pretend to be confused? It'll be a problem since wife is in the body of a child! It seems wife has more common sense than some people here on MAL! This really isn't something that needs mental gymnastics really.So per the premise of the show, why would it be an objective problem if husband and wife got intimate with each other? Just morally speaking. To make it clear, husband CAN get intimate with reincarnated wife once she's no longer a child (18+). Sure, age gap would make it disturbing for many, but that's a separate topic. Hopefully we can agree that 60yo dating 18yo doesn't make 60yo a pedo. It doesn't matter if wife is 40yo+ mentally, currently she's still in a body of a child. Obviously the two can be verbally intimate in private if they want, but there should be no need to even discuss why physical intimacy is a NO. Again, there's no need for mental gymnastics to understand why MC getting intimate with a grade schooler wife is a problem. In Mushoku's case Rudy wouldn't have been a pedo if he waited to get 18+ physically. Doesn't matter if he starts dating 18yo or 60 yo women after, what matter is he doesn't date or touch underage girls! |
Oct 7, 5:29 PM
#64
Reply to Piromysl
Those two absolutely never fail to have the worst take possible lmao
@Piromysl You had better not be fucking talking about me, I've literally never seen you have a good take. lmao |
If you reply back to me and I never respond, I lost interest and don't care. Sorry about that. |
Oct 7, 8:32 PM
#65
LostSpectre said: @Piromysl You had better not be fucking talking about me, I've literally never seen you have a good take. lmao Sure, Mr "Goblin Protagonist Raping Women Is A Good Thing And Then I See Pdfiliaa Where It Literally Doesn't Exist" lul |
Oct 7, 10:45 PM
#66
Reply to rsc-pl
@MyllerPhiem
That’s exactly what’s tourists are doing. Grow up, until then stop posting. You sound like a grade schooler. There’s no such thing as like questionable fiction and art. If you think there are, you don’t deserve to consume the art. Just stick with your country ‘safe’ TV.
That’s exactly what’s tourists are doing. Grow up, until then stop posting. You sound like a grade schooler. There’s no such thing as like questionable fiction and art. If you think there are, you don’t deserve to consume the art. Just stick with your country ‘safe’ TV.
@rsc-pl Your gatekeeping statements are the true grade schooler arguments in here. I'll correct myself, your arguments sounds more like some home schooled guy that never had any contact with other people outside their own family, much less higher education. It reeks of some really closed minded verbose meant to brainwash people without any real evidence to sustain it. There’s no such thing as like questionable fiction and art. Says who? What kind of bible or holy tablet states this chidlish and proofless statement? Anything man made is open to criticism, from it's craftmanship to it's final purpouse. Art is not immune to questioning wheter it's bronze sculpture of a half naked man in a thinking pose, a banana taped to the wall or a urinal in an art gallery. Just stick with your country ‘safe’ TV. Further evidence of your ignorance and intolerance towards different thoughts in general. It's easier for people like you to tell others "go back to your country" than to actually try to see things from all perspectives. you don’t deserve to consume the art. Nothing but a tantrum of a spoiled and uneducated gatekeeping child. |
KimurahOct 7, 10:51 PM
Oct 8, 1:43 AM
#67
Reply to Kimurah
@rsc-pl
Your gatekeeping statements are the true grade schooler arguments in here.
I'll correct myself, your arguments sounds more like some home schooled guy that never had any contact with other people outside their own family, much less higher education. It reeks of some really closed minded verbose meant to brainwash people without any real evidence to sustain it.
There’s no such thing as like questionable fiction and art.
Says who? What kind of bible or holy tablet states this chidlish and proofless statement? Anything man made is open to criticism, from it's craftmanship to it's final purpouse. Art is not immune to questioning wheter it's bronze sculpture of a half naked man in a thinking pose, a banana taped to the wall or a urinal in an art gallery.
Just stick with your country ‘safe’ TV.
Further evidence of your ignorance and intolerance towards different thoughts in general. It's easier for people like you to tell others "go back to your country" than to actually try to see things from all perspectives.
you don’t deserve to consume the art.
Nothing but a tantrum of a spoiled and uneducated gatekeeping child.
Your gatekeeping statements are the true grade schooler arguments in here.
I'll correct myself, your arguments sounds more like some home schooled guy that never had any contact with other people outside their own family, much less higher education. It reeks of some really closed minded verbose meant to brainwash people without any real evidence to sustain it.
There’s no such thing as like questionable fiction and art.
Says who? What kind of bible or holy tablet states this chidlish and proofless statement? Anything man made is open to criticism, from it's craftmanship to it's final purpouse. Art is not immune to questioning wheter it's bronze sculpture of a half naked man in a thinking pose, a banana taped to the wall or a urinal in an art gallery.
Just stick with your country ‘safe’ TV.
Further evidence of your ignorance and intolerance towards different thoughts in general. It's easier for people like you to tell others "go back to your country" than to actually try to see things from all perspectives.
you don’t deserve to consume the art.
Nothing but a tantrum of a spoiled and uneducated gatekeeping child.
@Kimurah whatever you say. Pretty bold seeing you're mentioning anything about ignorance. Dude, who stands up for a terminally ignorant person who has such a closed view of reality that he looks for “questionable” things everywhere in fiction and art put himself as the morality police. Yeah, tell me more about ignorance. It's easier for people like you to tell others "go back to your country" than to actually try to see things from all perspectives. It's just so pathetic that it's laughable. You can't be real here. Of course it is. If someone can't assimilate, he should be deported. The constant complaining about “problematic” and “questionable” things has become so pathetic and tiresome in the recent years that if you still think gatekeeping is a bad thing, I just feel sorry for you. You're sticking with a fandom built on a love of things, concepts and culture that is vastly different from what a parochial person who has probably never even left the border of his state (or even state) is used to. For any sane and reasonable person, the matter is simple - either I accept a different reality and view of foreign art, or I do not consume something I am not a target audience. Your mention of the glued banana is laughable. If I don't like a certain type of art, I don't go to exhibitions related to it and I don't tell people who see the point that they are mentally ill and deviant. Moreover, criticism is not about looking shallowly through one's own narrow morals and applying it on someone's art, but about presenting what specifically one does not like. I'm not going to advance this discussion. Especially after your whole tantrum about education. Nice projection. Bye. |
rsc-plOct 8, 1:57 AM
Dub = fake crap. Always. |
Oct 8, 4:00 AM
#68
The only thing the title was doing is give certain preconceptions, which don't even come true. So it is better it was changed. From the English title one would assume that he will date and marry an elementary school student, not that it's reincarnation. The new title doesn't give that preconception and it's basically just the japanese short name title Tsumasho |
Oct 8, 8:39 AM
#69
Reply to Dumb-Dumb
@ShirikonDaichi Because it's disgusting to see shit like this, even if it is animated.
Also you probably do want people to stop associating anime with degenerate stuff and weird and asocial people. Being against WEIRD SHIT LIKE THIS WILL HELP.
Also you probably do want people to stop associating anime with degenerate stuff and weird and asocial people. Being against WEIRD SHIT LIKE THIS WILL HELP.
@Dumb-Dumb says “disgusting to see shit like this” — SHIT LIKE *WHAT*, YOU IDIOT? You (CLEARLY) haven’t watched it and so you have seen NOTHIN, because there IS nothing “diSgUsTiNg” to see. So GFY |
ShirikonDaichiOct 8, 8:49 AM
Oct 8, 8:43 AM
#70
Reply to MyllerPhiem
@ShirikonDaichi The premise is that she is his wife, a person with a, dunno, 40 year old mind.
Again, people were giving Rudy from Mushoku Tensei shit, because he was a 40yo guy's mind in the body of an 8yo boy approaching a 10yo girl. And that criticism was fair, ofc. But what if Rudy had approach 18+ yo women? Would that have been ok? From his side? The woman would be a pedophile, ofc. Rudy? Not.
And now here we have this anime where the 40yo woman is in a 10yo's body, but the adult guy she's approached isn't some stranger, but her husband. Someone who would NEVER approach young girls on his own otherwise. So per the premise of the show, why would it be an objective problem if husband and wife got intimate with each other? Just morally speaking.
Again, people were giving Rudy from Mushoku Tensei shit, because he was a 40yo guy's mind in the body of an 8yo boy approaching a 10yo girl. And that criticism was fair, ofc. But what if Rudy had approach 18+ yo women? Would that have been ok? From his side? The woman would be a pedophile, ofc. Rudy? Not.
And now here we have this anime where the 40yo woman is in a 10yo's body, but the adult guy she's approached isn't some stranger, but her husband. Someone who would NEVER approach young girls on his own otherwise. So per the premise of the show, why would it be an objective problem if husband and wife got intimate with each other? Just morally speaking.
@MyllerPhiem says “The premise is that she is his wife” — no, the premise is that she WAS his wife before she died. Now she’s a 10 year old girl with a new family.. She is not his wife anymore, and she knows it. And he knows it. And she just wants him to get his shit together and get on with his life without her. Simple, but mentally deranged retards can’t understand this simple plot device, and just sexualize everything about it. It’s disgusting. They are disgusting. |
Oct 8, 8:47 AM
#71
Reply to henwens
The only thing the title was doing is give certain preconceptions, which don't even come true. So it is better it was changed.
From the English title one would assume that he will date and marry an elementary school student, not that it's reincarnation.
The new title doesn't give that preconception and it's basically just the japanese short name title Tsumasho
From the English title one would assume that he will date and marry an elementary school student, not that it's reincarnation.
The new title doesn't give that preconception and it's basically just the japanese short name title Tsumasho
@henwens says “So it is better it was changed” — better for who? For low IQ people who don’t understand merchandising or clickbait? Better for delusional people who can’t separate fiction from reality? For sexually obsessed deviance who look for perversion everywhere? Certainly not for normal people who don’t have any of these problems understanding the title, the plot, and that there’s nothing perverse about it. |
Oct 8, 8:58 AM
#72
Reply to LostSpectre
@ShirikonDaichi Nah. Cope. You're beyond ignorant if you think anime of all mediums doesn't have plenty of sus premises.
Also, ironic that you're using the language of people who most commonly defend sexualized children in anime. LOL
Also, ironic that you're using the language of people who most commonly defend sexualized children in anime. LOL
@LostSpectre the only “cope” going on here is yours. NEVER did I say, as you accused me of saying, that I think “anime of all mediums doesn’t have <perversions>”. SOME of it surely does (aka mainly hentai manga and anime). But that’s NOT what this dhow is; what we are talking about here is one specific title, which is doing nothing perverted. But you keep crying about how perverted it is, showing no proof of your allegations. Sex obsessed freak tourists need to STFU and GTFO of anime if it’s too much for their fragile psyches to handle. |
Oct 8, 8:59 AM
#73
Reply to ShirikonDaichi
@henwens says “So it is better it was changed” — better for who? For low IQ people who don’t understand merchandising or clickbait? Better for delusional people who can’t separate fiction from reality? For sexually obsessed deviance who look for perversion everywhere? Certainly not for normal people who don’t have any of these problems understanding the title, the plot, and that there’s nothing perverse about it.
@ShirikonDaichi What did you like about the English title over the Japanese short form one? I don't generally like using the English titles anyway. Not for this case, but a lot of them are garbage translations or literally have nothing to do with the title the author gave his work. It's not like reading the English title helped you get a grasp of what it's about, as most people would assume something else.. with the jp title at least they'll check the premise before making assumptions. Also I appreciate accurate titles over click bait ones, if you mean click baiting may have been better |
Oct 8, 9:04 AM
#74
Reply to henwens
@ShirikonDaichi What did you like about the English title over the Japanese short form one? I don't generally like using the English titles anyway. Not for this case, but a lot of them are garbage translations or literally have nothing to do with the title the author gave his work.
It's not like reading the English title helped you get a grasp of what it's about, as most people would assume something else.. with the jp title at least they'll check the premise before making assumptions.
Also I appreciate accurate titles over click bait ones, if you mean click baiting may have been better
It's not like reading the English title helped you get a grasp of what it's about, as most people would assume something else.. with the jp title at least they'll check the premise before making assumptions.
Also I appreciate accurate titles over click bait ones, if you mean click baiting may have been better
@henwens wut. This isn’t about “liking the English title”. It’s about the dangers and ultimately the social horrors of unchecked woke crybaby tourists demanding changes to things they are too fragile or low-IQ to understand. If they think anime as it is written is icky, they should GTFO. They should not demand the art be changed. Woke marxist cancer is fatal to civilization over the long haul. Sure, this is just one small thing. But when they’re multi millions of small things, it adds up. |
Oct 8, 9:41 AM
#75
henwens said: @ShirikonDaichi What did you like about the English title over the Japanese short form one? I personally prefer the English title because it is a perfect and ultimate litmus test. |
Oct 12, 6:15 PM
#76
I'm making a prediction, everyone on this thread uses twitter. Anyways I understand people being hesitant to watch this show but based off of the first two episodes it's just filled with wholesomeness with zero "loli bait" or whatever you want to call it. It think it's silly to instantly call anyone who questions the title a "tourist" aka. not a real anime fan but at the same time insinuating that anyone who watches this anime is a pedo when nothing of the sort comes up is even more insane. @Piromysl @LostSpectre You two should do that challenge where your handcuffed to each other for a day. That would be very entertaining. |
-Login to mal -Looks at notifications -Three messages deleted "Oh no" |
Oct 13, 9:10 AM
#77
MyllerPhiem said: OP doesn't know what "tourist" means. Nobody is a tourist for criticizing the extremely questionable optics of this anime. Doesn't matter how "wholesome" you claim the story is. without context anything Is questionable. You should know the context before claiming something as an absolute. Preconceptions are valid, but they aren't always right. |
Oct 13, 11:05 AM
#78
Reply to HansDevX
The tourist freaks can say all they want, this anime in it's first two episode has been a 10/10 but in MAL it's a 7.25? Yikes, you can count on westerners on having bad taste and projecting their insecurities on the internet.
@HansDevX As a westerner I do not claim them as people I would associate with. |
Oct 13, 11:17 AM
#79
Reply to ShirikonDaichi
@CrasianLe speaking as an American who has enjoyed anime since the 70s I find NOTHING WHATSOEVER “crazy or outrageous“ about this anime.
Don’t conflate “American woke leftist anime tourists“ with “Americans in general“. Big difference. A lot of people in America still have their heads on straight, and can discern the difference between fiction and reality.
You can identify the sane ones easily, because they are the ones who don’t complain about everything, demand special pronouns, sexualize every anime title and plot, and live in a constant state of fake moral outrage
Don’t conflate “American woke leftist anime tourists“ with “Americans in general“. Big difference. A lot of people in America still have their heads on straight, and can discern the difference between fiction and reality.
You can identify the sane ones easily, because they are the ones who don’t complain about everything, demand special pronouns, sexualize every anime title and plot, and live in a constant state of fake moral outrage
@ShirikonDaichi I agree whole heartedly. you have a few years on me, not many btw. the lack of self awareness by people that take a title at face value and think it will just devolve into some degen stuff is sad. I've watched anime since before this site came about and I had learned well enough how to find what I wanted online. I wouldn't solely blame anything on leftist woke americans as the right side has it's place in the argument as well. Not all of either side by the way. You said what I wanted to say before I could. I find the series nice as it doesn't go down the degen route. At least it hasn't yet. Not much into manga myself due to having issues focusing on small wording. You should see the ones going oh this is some pdf stuff or ok drake or diddies dream kind of cringe |
Oct 19, 8:31 PM
#80
Hey, can you drop me some links of them lashing on the staffs etc? Thanks in advance! |
Rants and possibly reviewing shows I have watched. |
Oct 23, 9:21 AM
#81
Reply to MyllerPhiem
OP doesn't know what "tourist" means.
Nobody is a tourist for criticizing the extremely questionable optics of this anime. Doesn't matter how "wholesome" you claim the story is.
Nobody is a tourist for criticizing the extremely questionable optics of this anime. Doesn't matter how "wholesome" you claim the story is.
@MyllerPhiem True, they're just prudes. |
Oct 23, 10:03 AM
#82
*Reads the thread So what exactly is the title difference? I translated "妻、小学生になる。" and it seems to be fairly accurate? It keeps translating to "My wife becomes an elementary school student" versus "If My wife becomes an elementary school student". Maybe it is a result of the literal translation versus the actual meaning being misunderstood. Searching in Japanese only brings me the exact same characters for the source material. I don't really understand what we are evening arguing about, to be honest. |
Auroraloose's Aurorasimp |
Oct 23, 11:57 AM
#84
Reply to LostSpectre
@ShirikonDaichi Nah. Cope. You're beyond ignorant if you think anime of all mediums doesn't have plenty of sus premises.
Also, ironic that you're using the language of people who most commonly defend sexualized children in anime. LOL
Also, ironic that you're using the language of people who most commonly defend sexualized children in anime. LOL
@LostSpectre LOL@ an ignorant coper calling others ignorant and coping. I don’t need to cope because I am a mentally healthy and confident of the facts, unlike all of the unhinged deviant freaks who can take a wholesome story and twist it into something perverted because that’s the only movie they ever have in their heads. |
Oct 23, 12:07 PM
#85
Reply to PeripheralVision
*Reads the thread
So what exactly is the title difference? I translated "妻、小学生になる。" and it seems to be fairly accurate? It keeps translating to "My wife becomes an elementary school student" versus "If My wife becomes an elementary school student". Maybe it is a result of the literal translation versus the actual meaning being misunderstood. Searching in Japanese only brings me the exact same characters for the source material.
I don't really understand what we are evening arguing about, to be honest.
So what exactly is the title difference? I translated "妻、小学生になる。" and it seems to be fairly accurate? It keeps translating to "My wife becomes an elementary school student" versus "If My wife becomes an elementary school student". Maybe it is a result of the literal translation versus the actual meaning being misunderstood. Searching in Japanese only brings me the exact same characters for the source material.
I don't really understand what we are evening arguing about, to be honest.
@PeripheralVision it isn’t about minor translation details like the presence of the word “if“, or using the word “becomes“ versus “became”. It’s about the mentally twisted and perverted people who can’t see a title that includes the words “wife“ and “elementary school student“ without jumping to the pedophilic conclusion (without any evidence or even bothering to read the description or or watching Ep1) that it is some kind of pedo hen show. And the argument here is between those freaks and the sane people who can see that it is factually a wholesome story with a lot of touching emotional moments about loss and joy. And the post itself was made because Crunchyroll disappointingly decided to basically bury the original name (that you quoted above) and replace it with a Japanese portmanteau to give the freaks less to complain about. Freaks win; sanity loses. |
Oct 23, 12:11 PM
#86
Reply to Love_And_Forward
@MyllerPhiem True, they're just prudes.
@Love_And_Forward - no, they aren’t “just prudes“. They are mentally ill, because they are still standing their ground and fighting against verifiable facts that this is not some pedo hen crap, but rather a wholesome story about family, loss, and joy. Prudes could actually learn facts and change their mind. These people are psychotically broken. |
Oct 23, 12:36 PM
#87
Reply to ShirikonDaichi
@PeripheralVision it isn’t about minor translation details like the presence of the word “if“, or using the word “becomes“ versus “became”. It’s about the mentally twisted and perverted people who can’t see a title that includes the words “wife“ and “elementary school student“ without jumping to the pedophilic conclusion (without any evidence or even bothering to read the description or or watching Ep1) that it is some kind of pedo hen show. And the argument here is between those freaks and the sane people who can see that it is factually a wholesome story with a lot of touching emotional moments about loss and joy. And the post itself was made because Crunchyroll disappointingly decided to basically bury the original name (that you quoted above) and replace it with a Japanese portmanteau to give the freaks less to complain about. Freaks win; sanity loses.
ShirikonDaichi said: eplace it with a Japanese portmanteau to give the freaks less to complain about From what I have seen this is also how this show’s titled is shortened overseas in the original Japanese websites. For example, the official website for the anime I believe clearly shows this abbreviation: https://tsumasho-anime.com/ Or how about its Twitter handle for the live action, which was created in 2021. https://x.com/tsumasho_tbs There is no evidence to suggest it was changed as a result of any outcry;a few people complaining on Twitter does not constitute an outrage anymore than a single homeless man rambling about tiny men in his hat suggests a widespread belief in such an outlandish conspiracy. I think the more likely explanation is just marketing tactics and not some political conspiracy. I will be honest, threads like this complaining about non existing fringe elements on social media seems pretty disingenuous, honestly. As strongly held as my own political beliefs are, I think it pays to also not be political 24/7 and to live in the real world. |
PeripheralVisionOct 23, 12:40 PM
Auroraloose's Aurorasimp |
Oct 23, 12:43 PM
#88
Reply to ShirikonDaichi
@Love_And_Forward - no, they aren’t “just prudes“. They are mentally ill, because they are still standing their ground and fighting against verifiable facts that this is not some pedo hen crap, but rather a wholesome story about family, loss, and joy. Prudes could actually learn facts and change their mind. These people are psychotically broken.
@ShirikonDaichi Well, that too. But mostly it's because they're virtue signaling intellectually dishonest piss liberals. |
Oct 23, 2:23 PM
#89
Reply to ShirikonDaichi
@PeripheralVision it isn’t about minor translation details like the presence of the word “if“, or using the word “becomes“ versus “became”. It’s about the mentally twisted and perverted people who can’t see a title that includes the words “wife“ and “elementary school student“ without jumping to the pedophilic conclusion (without any evidence or even bothering to read the description or or watching Ep1) that it is some kind of pedo hen show. And the argument here is between those freaks and the sane people who can see that it is factually a wholesome story with a lot of touching emotional moments about loss and joy. And the post itself was made because Crunchyroll disappointingly decided to basically bury the original name (that you quoted above) and replace it with a Japanese portmanteau to give the freaks less to complain about. Freaks win; sanity loses.
@ShirikonDaichi This is a pedo anime. Only in such anime can a grown-up woman take a stranger elementary schooler at home with her and thinks this is fine. As happened in last episode. Super fucked up scene. |
If you haven't watched "Fantastic Children", don't talk about "best anime". Thank you. |
Oct 23, 2:26 PM
#90
Reply to ShirikonDaichi
@Love_And_Forward - no, they aren’t “just prudes“. They are mentally ill, because they are still standing their ground and fighting against verifiable facts that this is not some pedo hen crap, but rather a wholesome story about family, loss, and joy. Prudes could actually learn facts and change their mind. These people are psychotically broken.
@ShirikonDaichi There's nothing wholesome about this. We have a grown man who fawns over his reborn wife, but neither are having THE discussion they should be having: "WHAT DO WE WANT FROM THIS?" Instead they're all ignoring the elephant in the room and that makes it creepy. You are a real tourist, because you're not even willing to engage in proper thoughts, wishing death penalty on other people like some asshole. Tell us: If YOUR wife was transformed into an elementary schooler's body, keeping all her original memories and personality though, would you break up with her? |
If you haven't watched "Fantastic Children", don't talk about "best anime". Thank you. |
Oct 25, 11:28 PM
#91
rsc-pl said: whatever you say. Pretty bold seeing you're mentioning anything about ignorance. Dude, who stands up for a terminally ignorant person who has such a closed view of reality that he looks for “questionable” things everywhere in fiction and art put himself as the morality police. Yeah, tell me more about ignorance. Hipocrisy and arrogance at it's finest. You're barfing terms like "morality police" but you yourself are gatekeeping people from expressing in a discussion forum because it contradictics your very own sheltered beliefs. Pathetic. rsc-pl said: Of course it is. If someone can't assimilate, he should be deported. The constant complaining about “problematic” and “questionable” things has become so pathetic and tiresome in the recent years that if you still think gatekeeping is a bad thing, I just feel sorry for you. Thank you. You're already digging your own grave placing yourself in the same position as a Trump supporter yelling and claiming for people with "alien" vision that differs to yours as people that should be deported out of your own state/country or should we call it a forum to which you feel entitled to kick poeple out despite having no real authority, aka the bottom dueller Karen. rsc-pl said: You're sticking with a fandom built on a love of things, concepts and culture that is vastly different from what a parochial person who has probably never even left the border of his state (or even state) is used to. Eh? I don't stick with fandoms. That's some sheep herd mentality. I'm a person with my own values and I'm free to feel empathy to those who align with those (or not) but I'm also free to reject those with an alienating and gatekeeping mentality like yours. rsc-pl said: For any sane and reasonable person, the matter is simple - either I accept a different reality and view of foreign art, or I do not consume something I am not a target audience. Your mention of the glued banana is laughable. If I don't like a certain type of art, I don't go to exhibitions related to it and I don't tell people who see the point that they are mentally ill and deviant. And this is your very own short sighted issue. You're putting yourself on a pedestal acting as some sort of role model to follow. I got news for you sweety pie, the world doesn't revolve around you and plenty of people have their own guides and are not intimidated by Karens and their gatekeeping babbling when it comes to provide criticsm for fictional works, that I should also emphasize you don't own and have no right on this level of entitlement. rsc-pl said: Moreover, criticism is not about looking shallowly through one's own narrow morals and applying it on someone's art, but about presenting what specifically one does not like. More evidence that your are sheltered or that you decide to live in your very own bubble. Criticsm goes very close to personal beliefs and education. The best critics always make footnotes that their work is quite subjective and it's heavily tied to their beliefs and metrics in order for the audience to take it with a grain of salt. rsc-pl said: I'm not going to advance this discussion. Especially after your whole tantrum about education. Nice projection. Bye. Good, because you just babbled a bunch of very short sighted karen nonsense in order to feel vindicated for being called out on your very ignorant original post about how criticism works in the real world. |
KimurahOct 25, 11:32 PM
Oct 26, 5:33 PM
#92
Agreed. This should have a 10 and be top of the list on MAL. |
Oct 27, 12:44 AM
#93
Reply to MyllerPhiem
@ShirikonDaichi The premise is that she is his wife, a person with a, dunno, 40 year old mind.
Again, people were giving Rudy from Mushoku Tensei shit, because he was a 40yo guy's mind in the body of an 8yo boy approaching a 10yo girl. And that criticism was fair, ofc. But what if Rudy had approach 18+ yo women? Would that have been ok? From his side? The woman would be a pedophile, ofc. Rudy? Not.
And now here we have this anime where the 40yo woman is in a 10yo's body, but the adult guy she's approached isn't some stranger, but her husband. Someone who would NEVER approach young girls on his own otherwise. So per the premise of the show, why would it be an objective problem if husband and wife got intimate with each other? Just morally speaking.
Again, people were giving Rudy from Mushoku Tensei shit, because he was a 40yo guy's mind in the body of an 8yo boy approaching a 10yo girl. And that criticism was fair, ofc. But what if Rudy had approach 18+ yo women? Would that have been ok? From his side? The woman would be a pedophile, ofc. Rudy? Not.
And now here we have this anime where the 40yo woman is in a 10yo's body, but the adult guy she's approached isn't some stranger, but her husband. Someone who would NEVER approach young girls on his own otherwise. So per the premise of the show, why would it be an objective problem if husband and wife got intimate with each other? Just morally speaking.
@MyllerPhiem The truth is there would be absolutely nothing wrong with them getting intimate with each other, assuming both want it. We are dealing with consenting adults here. The twist leads to bad optics, as you said, and I honestly don't get the sense that the husband is sexually attracted to his "now-ten-years-old-wife," while the wife might actually be attracted to him... but I would certainly bet that they would both want to at least sleep in the same bed. It's shaping up to be more of a tragedy than a lolicon fantasy. |
Oct 27, 1:02 AM
#94
Reply to Yui_Suzumiya69
Agreed. This should have a 10 and be top of the list on MAL.
@Yui_Suzumiya69 That's reaching, I think. It's a good one, though. |
Oct 27, 10:25 AM
#95
i do not understand this forum, what do you mean by tourists?? |
Oct 27, 10:53 AM
#96
Dear lord, this show made the miller devolve into a tourist. |
No, this isn't my signature. |
Oct 27, 5:45 PM
#97
I had a good cackle reading this! Thank you everynyan!!! Especially the linked Re:Monster topic LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL |
Oct 29, 5:16 PM
#98
Reply to Love_And_Forward
@Yui_Suzumiya69 That's reaching, I think. It's a good one, though.
@Love_And_Forward I rate nearly everything a 10 though, lol. I rated Eromanga Sensei a 10 and have watched it multiple times. |
Nov 14, 2:04 AM
#99
Tbh the only thing that pisses me off is that people literally downplaying this anime just because of the title alone, ignoring the fact that this is possibly one of the greatest media that depicts a form of mourning and moving on over someone you love/hold dear in your life. There are a lot of good moral aspects and life lessons from this anime and people focused solely on the MC being an elementary student and then thrashed it for being a "Lolicon" anime, like bruh. Can't people see from multiple aspects instead of one? I saw through the manga and the ending and the life lessons/messages definitely outweights the taboo/corny aspects of this series. Live action was aired a couple years back and it had no problems, it's pretty much popular that it got both LA and an anime, it's quite rare that it got a LA first but still get an anime tho, usually if it's LA first then there should be no anime. |
Nov 14, 11:10 AM
#100
If Lolicon shows are "immoral" and "degenerate" (ironic words lovers of savage behavior love to throw around) then all violent shows deserve the same tag and cancellation anything that's not completely moral and normie behavior needs to go and anime itself needs too look as generic as possible too @Yui_Suzumiya69 Sagiri is not even loli she is a teen hag who probably has willingly taken many cocks already not counting his brother's only an American would think otherwise. |
More topics from this board
» Anime original ending [SPOILERS]BrotherCoa - Nov 19 |
10 |
by sDluffy
»»
Yesterday, 1:17 AM |
|
Poll: » Tsuma, Shougakusei ni Naru. Episode 8 DiscussionStark700 - Nov 17 |
49 |
by landofthekwt
»»
Nov 20, 7:12 PM |
|
» Issues having the Comedy tag and more...Janethan23 - Nov 17 |
29 |
by sDluffy
»»
Nov 19, 6:17 PM |
|
Poll: » Tsuma, Shougakusei ni Naru. Episode 7 Discussion ( 1 2 )Stark700 - Nov 10 |
52 |
by Alfredo-Sauce
»»
Nov 18, 11:07 AM |
|
Poll: » Tsuma, Shougakusei ni Naru. Episode 6 DiscussionStark700 - Nov 3 |
47 |
by GavrocheN7
»»
Nov 17, 5:40 PM |