AnimeJunki3 said: Why? Why? If they just let Shirley stay dead, they wouldn't have to do to this alternate timeline crap. They could have just made this in to a direct sequel! Why the hell did they even let her live?? Was her death too much for the show?! Because they could have ruined the perfect ending of the show |
  "I had a dream. Under the full moon, I was a child embraced by nostalgic warmth. But when I wake from the dream, only a vague sense of longing remains...that, too, will soon disappear with a single tear like mountain dew"  |
| This is not an alternative timeline, but a retcon. Shirley will have a role to play later on. |
 |
| Because the movie timeline is created to milk some money off fans? Thats made so the original anime ending didnt get ruined. It would be a bad thing if they DID continue with a sequel |
 |
| What's with the people who hate this movie? I do not understand. Maybe this movie was made for people who don't accept that Lelouch is dead. And I am one of them lol. |
 |
| Just be thankful that this absolute big pile of dog crap is in an alternate universe. At least they didn't ruin the main and only canon timeline... |
Mezo_78 said: It's not alternative It is known that the wielder of the code has immortality .... So when Lelouch killed his father, the code transferred from him to the latter, and as known the code activates when The wielder dies just as it happened before when Lelouch killed Charles at Akash Sword, Charles lost his ability to use Geass, but he became immortal. The same applies to Lelouch when Suzaku killed him. Therefore, Lelouch is still alive, but his consciousness was lost because he killed what's claimed to be GODS in Realm C during his confrontation against Charles. What I could not figure out is the possibility of continuing to use the Geass despite wielding the code. Anyway, the show was only made for those who wanted to see him again. Lol, the creators already confirmed that Lelouch is dead for good a decade ago. I'll believe them instead of some fanboys with childish theories... |
Mezo_78 said: WNightfall said: Lol, the creators already confirmed that Lelouch is dead for good a decade ago. I'll believe them instead of some fanboys with childish theories... WNightfall said: Lol, the creators already confirmed that Lelouch is dead for good a decade ago. I'll believe them instead of some fanboys with childish theories... You noticed the creators confirmation and didn't notice the film in the first place is "original production" very well then Oh yeah, well then, someone who can't accept that this is "alternative" lmao |
Mezo_78 said: looks like someone doesn't know the difference between "original sequel" & "alternative". Then explain to me what's the difference then. The thread is about why they created an alternate timeline in the first place. |
Mezo_78 said: WNightfall said: Then explain to me what's the difference then. The thread is about why they created an alternate timeline in the first place. I said before they only made it for those who wanted to see Lelouch again, and the production is original. There are 3 movies (Koudou-Handou-Oudou) produced to summarize the whole anime in which Shirley wasn't killed..... Yeah, Shirley was alive during the events of the trilogy which is considered an alternative setting but the end still the same. A year later they came up with a sequel (original) CG:FnL which you consider crap and the majority so and I explained why he is alive again before as was MENTIONED in the FnL film. IN SUM, the producers were free and said "let's bring him back to life again, we got our pleas, evidence, and facts making the resurrection of him reasonable without any defect, let's bring him back so fans may live happily rest of their lives" It still wouldn't prove that the Code theory is correct if we're talking about R1 and R2, it's just correct with Re;surrection timeline. Code Geass writer Ichiro Okouchi (credited as creator) already said that in 2008 that Lelouch's story went "full stop" but the stories of people around him still continues. Which implies that the theory is being debunked. |
Mezo_78 said: WNightfall said: It still wouldn't prove that the Code theory is correct if we're talking about R1 and R2, it's just correct with Re;surrection timeline. Code Geass writer Ichiro Okouchi (credited as creator) already said that in 2008 that Lelouch's story went "full stop" but the stories of people around him still continues. Which implies that the theory is being debunked. I do respect your opinion but the CODE theory is correct in the original timeline. For example, CC & VV both were CODE wielders so they became immortal and this goes for Charles too when VV gave him his code before dying during Lelouch attack on the temple (in R2 may be in ep 16) and this explains how he wasn't killed after Lelouch ordered him to suicide at Akash sword. So far the CODE theory is correct whether in R1,2 or FnL, the difference is how Lelouch got the code, in R2 Lelouch killed Charles, and wasn't revealed he got it or not and the story stops. but in FnL he got the code from his father as it was itched on his chest. Concerning the author's statement as I said before it's an original sequel, meaning the author has nothing to do with it. The creators Goro Taniguchi and Ichiro Okouchi are still the director and writer of Resurrection movie. They created an alternate timeline, instead of a direct sequel, so that the main timeline wouldn't be disrupted, which means their decision from 2008 doesn't have to be changed or whatsoever. I'd consider the words of a creator of a certain work as absolute. Their words are the law of the world they created. If they already debunked a fan theory a decade ago, I'll consider it a fact. |
Mezo_78 said: WNightfall said: The creators Goro Taniguchi and Ichiro Okouchi are still the director and writer of Resurrection movie. They created an alternate timeline, instead of a direct sequel, so that the main timeline wouldn't be disrupted, which means their decision from 2008 doesn't have to be changed or whatsoever. I'd consider the words of a creator of a certain work as absolute. Their words are the law of the world they created. If they already debunked a fan theory a decade ago, I'll consider it a fact. I said before original goddamn sequel for the goddamn alternative trilogy and you keep saying the author,theory....etc You know something damn this show and damn that goddamn code that looks a like a goddamn shit bird. BRUHHHHH you keep telling me that the code theory is correct wheter it's R1, R2 or FnL, of course I'll bring what the author said. Can't you understand that? Lmao. Oh btw, "Facts don't care about your feelings..." |
Mezo_78 said: WNightfall said: BRUHHHHH you keep telling me that the code theory is correct wheter it's R1, R2 or FnL, of course I'll bring what the author said. Can't you understand that? Lmao. Oh btw, "Facts don't care about your feelings..." And I don't care about your opinion nor you either LMAO THIS IS GOLD HAHAHAHAHA |
RichAthena said: WNightfall said: The creators Goro Taniguchi and Ichiro Okouchi are still the director and writer of Resurrection movie. They created an alternate timeline, instead of a direct sequel, so that the main timeline wouldn't be disrupted, which means their decision from 2008 doesn't have to be changed or whatsoever. I'd consider the words of a creator of a certain work as absolute. Their words are the law of the world they created. If they already debunked a fan theory a decade ago, I'll consider it a fact. They didn't debunk anything. While he said in a tweet that Lelouch's story has ended, that doesn't necessarily imply Lelouch's death. It's an open ending. There's even a cut scene that shows Lelouch as the cart-man at the last second. Someone uploaded it from the original aire it seems. It's said they cut that scene to leave an open ending. Shut the hell up. It's been years and you guys are still s*****........ |
It wasn't me who's stupid enough to believe an edited video from youtube. |
More topics from this board
Poll: » Code Geass: Fukkatsu no Lelouch Episode 1 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 )Hyuse - Feb 24, 2019 |
223 |
by anikevin
»»
Aug 25, 6:42 PM |
|
» why it's not considered as sequel to 2nd season of original series???NaughtySempai - May 21, 2021 |
13 |
by Apratim
»»
May 11, 11:14 PM |
|
Poll: » If you were Lelouch, what decision would you choose?Sanjay63773 - Jan 19, 2023 |
10 |
by Leonhart93
»»
Jan 3, 6:26 AM |
|
» Code Geass: Dakkan no Zquercifolia - Sep 19, 2023 |
5 |
by quercifolia
»»
Oct 1, 2023 7:45 AM |
|
» I'm confused after watching this ??WVM - Nov 27, 2022 |
6 |
by WVM
»»
Dec 4, 2022 12:34 AM |