New
What did you think of this chapter?
DO NOT discuss the source material beyond this chapter. If you want to discuss future events, please use separate threads.
DO NOT ask where to read/download this chapter or give links to copyrighted, non-fair use material.
DO NOT troll/bait/harass/abuse other users for liking or disliking the series/characters.
DO read the Manga Discussion Rules and Site & Forum Guidelines.
DO NOT ask where to read/download this chapter or give links to copyrighted, non-fair use material.
DO NOT troll/bait/harass/abuse other users for liking or disliking the series/characters.
DO read the Manga Discussion Rules and Site & Forum Guidelines.
Apr 13, 2017 9:56 AM
#51
Pudding got emotional because he liked her third eye. But do I feel bad for her? No. |
Apr 13, 2017 10:08 AM
#52
Apr 13, 2017 10:32 AM
#53
People have a hard time believing Pudding could be bullied because of her third eye on an island where you see weirdos everywhere but I think that's the real tragedy, she gets trashed for her appearance in the one place where you're supposed to be accepted no matter how you look. Sometimes it takes that single weird quirk about you to be frowned upon, and don't forget, kids are cruel Jack. The debate about Pudding "turning good" is another story, but I think it's established she's pretty evil at heart. Depends on how Oda handles it, she might at least let Sanji off the hook but she'll probably remain twisted, I hope so anyway. |
Apr 13, 2017 10:51 AM
#54
Well, that was shit. What is up with this plot twist? He said three words and she started bawling her eyes out when all this time she's been planning on killing him and has been mocking him. I swear, if she turns good because of this. |
Apr 13, 2017 11:59 AM
#55
great, Luffy doing kuchiyose no jutsu, lol as expected, the cake being eaten by Luffy. pudding might be starting to love sanji for real, sanji win the stage! Prince said: it's obviously Brulee, since she's shouting outloud that she's feel sorry for big mom before luffy jump out.Brûlée clones or Nami's Mirage Tempo. Place your bets folks. |
Apr 13, 2017 12:01 PM
#56
It was clear that Pudding have two different personality and hated her third eye, she tried to hide her real personality and hesitant in some points. Guess she just needed to get accept for her real person and her looks, sanji was perfect (well luffy crew will accept her and more they would say she have an awesome third eye). sanji hit her in the heart but still don't want to see her go good person like that .. Badass Katakuri, also with sanji dodges his shot! guess Katakuri can't see the future for 2 steps or for a step tries to change the future with it. Oh, i need next chapter now! |
Apr 13, 2017 12:02 PM
#57
It is said that Sanji's best at Kenbunshoku no Haki. That paid off, especially against the crazy Kenbunshoku no Haku that Katakuri got. |
Apr 13, 2017 2:09 PM
#58
Apr 13, 2017 2:12 PM
#59
Apr 13, 2017 4:02 PM
#60
Oh Yeah! Great job Oda! That is why I love One Piece, and that's why Sanji is the best character ever. I knew he would never disappoint me. |
“Right is right even if no one is doing it; wrong is wrong even if everyone is doing it.” ― Saint Augustine |
Apr 13, 2017 4:45 PM
#61
That's a really shaky twist there. "your third eye is cute" Her realistic reaction would be, yeah right pal nice lies, now have a bullet between your eyes, instead she starts crying cuz no one ever told her that before and she was bullied for it, how old is Pudding again? is she like 4 years old or something? this is not an adult or even a teenager reaction, this is someone you deemed worth killing and planned to do so but just because he compliments you, "oh god I'm so touched I'm gonna drop down and cry my eyes out! screw the plan!" Other than that Dogtooth looks pretty badass. |
Drake1000Apr 13, 2017 4:49 PM
Apr 13, 2017 5:44 PM
#62
To us readers Sanji's compliment may seem like not much at all, but to Pudding it's probably one of the most significant things in her life. |
Apr 13, 2017 6:41 PM
#63
Lol, I had a feeling something like this was gonna happen. But it was executed well so I actually felt for Pudding a little. Nonetheless, the real excitement begins. This is gonna be one of, if not the, most chaotic moments in One Piece so far. Sanji may have dodged a literal bullet or two, but there's a lot of monsters here, and a lot less allies. Drake1000 said: I have to disagree. She was surprised. There was no reason for her to believe that he was lying, because she whole-heartedly believed that Sanji had no suspicions whatsoever. Surprise does surprising things to a person... that's what surprise is. That's a really shaky twist there. "your third eye is cute" Her realistic reaction would be, yeah right pal nice lies, now have a bullet between your eyes, instead she starts crying cuz no one ever told her that before and she was bullied for it, how old is Pudding again? is she like 4 years old or something? this is not an adult or even a teenager reaction, this is someone you deemed worth killing and planned to do so but just because he compliments you, "oh god I'm so touched I'm gonna drop down and cry my eyes out! screw the plan!" She expected him to be too shocked and disgusted to react to her shooting him, instead he was happy. She wasn't expecting that, so she didn't know how to react. Maybe she's not 4 years old, but she _is_ treated like a 4 year old by her psychotic mother because she heartlessly murders people. It's not like she "deemed" him worth killing, she just loves killing people. And since that love for killing people started with her hatred of people teasing her, it makes sense that the one moment someone praises her for the one thing she hates about her self she fails to act. It's funny, cause from what I've seen, you said she'd turn out to be a good guy, and that Oda was just playing mind-games with the readers. That's nothing like what happened. Unless you think it's somehow all black and white and she has to be either solely evil, or purely good. She was surprised by his words, it doesn't mean she's been secretly good this whole time. She murders people for teasing her... not your most stable, kindhearted person. Even funnier is that the last words you said to me was stating that I "think" you hate this series. It's ironic that all I ever said to you in the past was that I believed you liked the series, just that you refused to let others have opinions. However by your reaction here it proves once and for all that you do hate this series, and all you're good for is trash talking it, and its fans. You literally waited til the moment the chapter released to belittle others and call this bullshit, when you weren't even right. Don't act like a dick, when it's not even close to what you said would happen. What just happened was about the only alternative to the things that you said would make it shit if they actually happened. |
Apr 13, 2017 10:28 PM
#64
Apr 13, 2017 10:55 PM
#65
I have to say that when Pudding started talking crap about Sanji to the point that he cried, I despised her and truly wished Sanji would slap her or something the moment she tried to kill him. But seeing her backstory, I'm slightly compelled to feel a bit sorry for her. Her past explains well about her personality, and makes me wonder what she's going to do now that she found someone who doesn't see her as an outcast. That Sanji though... why is my favorite character so stupid? Despite knowing her true colors and having SUFFERED from it, he still acted like himself. He could very well have died there, but luckily to him, his stupid personality not only might have saved him but also brought a change of heart to Pudding. I don't expect her to become a good person, but things might get interesting from now on. Luffy's entrance was so Luffy-like that he might not even have to mess with the picture lol. |
Apr 14, 2017 2:14 AM
#66
Hmm.. It wasn't really Sanji's first time seeing Pudding's 3rd eye, wasn't it? It's pretty hard to imagine but,, I personally think Sanji was acting when he complimented her "pretty" third eye.. idk lmao ;; |
Apr 14, 2017 3:32 AM
#67
Pudding...Ok...so she was really going to kill Sanji but....Well well....Did seriously expect that....well somewhat understand Puddings personality...People judge appearance....wouldn't go stab people, but people are breaking even less.. and WHAT!? CLones...what the hell....Nami's skill surely but what....Great Chapter and Color Page in next issue |
Victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival.~Winston Churchill "Fate of the universe will be Decided as it SHOULD be, in MORTAL KOMBAT!" ~Elder Gods "Justice WILL Prevail?" "But OF COURSE IT WILL!! WHOEVER WINS, BECOMES THE JUSTICE!!!" ~Donquixote Doflamingo (King, Pirate, Shichibukai, Philosopher(?) (One Piece)) |
Apr 14, 2017 4:55 AM
#68
I expected something better, meh. 3/5 Sanji is pathetic. |
Apr 14, 2017 6:16 AM
#69
HalibelTheEspada said: L It's funny, cause from what I've seen, you said she'd turn out to be a good guy, and that Oda was just playing mind-games with the readers. That's nothing like what happened. Unless you think it's somehow all black and white and she has to be either solely evil, or purely good. She was surprised by his words, it doesn't mean she's been secretly good this whole time. She murders people for teasing her... not your most stable, kindhearted person. Even funnier is that the last words you said to me was stating that I "think" you hate this series. It's ironic that all I ever said to you in the past was that I believed you liked the series, just that you refused to let others have opinions. However by your reaction here it proves once and for all that you do hate this series, and all you're good for is trash talking it, and its fans. You literally waited til the moment the chapter released to belittle others and call this bullshit, when you weren't even right. Don't act like a dick, when it's not even close to what you said would happen. What just happened was about the only alternative to the things that you said would make it shit if they actually happened. Go ahead and read through the last 50 posts I made within the last 15 chapters. I talked alot about that reveal several pages worth of text and my two opinions towards Pudding where: 1. Either her turning out to be a triple agent. Her foooling the Strawhats purposefully to safe them 2. Oda pulling the bullshit card and making her fall in love with Sanji, due to a gag. Hence my youtube link, right below the "called that shit meme". 3. If you try to refute my argument by claiming how "I just used vague descriptions and therefore I´d been right anyway". No I didn´t! I considered those two options specifically. I still think Pudding is a terrible perso. Specifically describing a scenartio, where she becomes ironically, the only woman of the series, that wants to be with him. But he doesn´t appreciate it because of her evilness. This being only one of a few scenarios for a Sanji loving Pudding. Evoked through Sanji´s womanzing personality. The core of my argument being Pudding falling for Sanji because of said character trait. This is what I had predicted. I was opposed against the idea, of Pudding actually following through , with the attempted murder of Sanji. Meaning that if she did attempted to shoot him and he dodged the bullet, I would have been wrong and disliked the outcome personally. Have fun finding those posts. It´s your obligation to prove me wrong, since I simply can refer to them. "You" are the one accusing me of being wrong here. when the prove is right there. I specifically added this: |
IsterioApr 14, 2017 6:31 AM
Apr 14, 2017 7:15 AM
#70
Jarjaxle said: and WHAT!? CLones...what the hell....Nami's skill surely but what....Great Chapter and Color Page in next issue Brulee's mirror powers. Remember what happened in the forest? |
Apr 14, 2017 8:16 AM
#71
Z4k said: "Yeah, I completely agree, OP. This has been meticulously planned and integrated into her character behaviour from the beginning.Pudding suddenly has insecurities over her third eye? Wait what? Did I miss a chapter or something because I never noticed that's how she felt about her third eye? The change of heart felt very contrived. The way she was raised and treated is also why she hated Sanji so much. She saw that he has fallen for her on the first sight, but he only saw her fake mask that she had to create because of her family. In her mind there was no way he wouldn't be repulsed once he sees her third eye, because there hasn't been anyone like that in her life so far. So his affection felt fake, like a mockery. Then when Sanji peeled off his mask to reveal his ugly, beaten up face to Pudding and shared his story, that must have felt so infuriating and confusing for her. Because her whole life she was told to hide her own ugliness, and has only met with disgust from those who saw her real face. She must have lost any hope of trusting anyone, so she took Sanji trusting her as a sign of weakness. No wonder that soon after she ended up revealing her third eye to Reiju and vented mocking Sanji so hard. In retrospect, that show how conflicted and broken she really is. Ultimately, she's a complex character, with a lot of pent-up anger. Pudding is a product of Big Mom's obsessions and possessiveness, a ticking bomb that might be even more dangerous than Tamate box. So it's sad that there people take her reaction in this chapter in such simplistic way." - /u/SalamiRocketFuel Some analysis from reddit I recommend everyone who didn't like the sudden new revelation regarding Pudding's backstory to give this a read. @HalibelTheEspada I remember you told me you don't really go on other One Piece forum except for MAL, I would highly suggest One Piece reddit, it's a great place for One Piece fans. |
ToG25thBaamApr 14, 2017 8:20 AM
Honobono Log - best slice of life short -------------------------------------------- most kawaii loli overlord ---------------------------- Donquixote Doflamingo AMV - Control |
Apr 14, 2017 12:08 PM
#72
ToG25thBaam said: Some analysis from reddit I recommend everyone who didn't like the sudden new revelation regarding Pudding's backstory to give this a read. I thought Pudding's actions this chapter made a lot of sense, but it was nice to see some well worded posts about the subject, thanks for sharing that. |
Apr 14, 2017 12:28 PM
#73
Isterio said: You know, I'll just go ahead and accept that you probably did, somewhere along the lines say that it was possible. I don't have the time or patience to go through all your posts, so I'll just admit that I'm wrong about that, and you probably did say that.Go ahead and read through the last 50 posts I made within the last 15 chapters. I talked alot about that reveal several pages worth of text and my two opinions towards Pudding where: 1. Either her turning out to be a triple agent. Her foooling the Strawhats purposefully to safe them 2. Oda pulling the bullshit card and making her fall in love with Sanji, due to a gag. Hence my youtube link, right below the "called that shit meme". 3. If you try to refute my argument by claiming how "I just used vague descriptions and therefore I´d been right anyway". No I didn´t! I considered those two options specifically. I still think Pudding is a terrible perso. Specifically describing a scenartio, where she becomes ironically, the only woman of the series, that wants to be with him. But he doesn´t appreciate it because of her evilness. This being only one of a few scenarios for a Sanji loving Pudding. Evoked through Sanji´s womanzing personality. The core of my argument being Pudding falling for Sanji because of said character trait. This is what I had predicted. I was opposed against the idea, of Pudding actually following through , with the attempted murder of Sanji. Meaning that if she did attempted to shoot him and he dodged the bullet, I would have been wrong and disliked the outcome personally. Have fun finding those posts. It´s your obligation to prove me wrong, since I simply can refer to them. "You" are the one accusing me of being wrong here. when the prove is right there. I specifically added this: I didn't miss the link, I just didn't add it, because it takes up a lot of space for my already lengthy post, so I just mentioned it instead. I wouldn't say that you gave "vague" descriptions, you definitely went into a lot of detail. I do know that you gave a ton more possibilities than that, though, and none of them did you consider good. If everything is considered bullshit to you, you're only gonna get bullshit. You're gonna have to accept that not every single thing that happens is going to be above being predicted. Why do you need to focus only on the few things you don't like? The rare times I've seen you say anything good is maybe just a line or two. I never see you going into detail about anything that you like. There's 100 other things going on in this arc, and the one thing you care about is the one thing that only had a few ways it could go. I think anyone who didn't at least consider this a possibility is just clueless. If you think it's so bad it's good, fine. I don't intend to single you out, you're just the most vocal about your grievances, and you rarely say anything good, it's hard to take anything you say as mere criticism. ToG25thBaam said: I'll definitely consider it, especially since One Piece is about the only manga/anime I follow still. Thanks@HalibelTheEspada I remember you told me you don't really go on other One Piece forum except for MAL, I would highly suggest One Piece reddit, it's a great place for One Piece fans. |
Apr 14, 2017 12:37 PM
#74
thebrentinator24 said: . How did Sanji dodge that jelly bean shot? Is his Kenbunshoku also advanced like Katakuri's?. There were a few posts like this. Even without better reflexes if someone knows an attack is coming it's easier to use the skills you do have to avoid the danger. People wondered the opposite when Luffy fought Cracker, that Cracker's armament haki was much stronger than Luffy in his gear 3'rd. However, Cracker attacked the part of his body he could reach that was least coated with armament haki. Stronger haki does not discount the benefit of surprise or intelligence. This could be said for fights across the series. So basically: Sanji's awareness haki + knowledge of the danger that he's in at that time = enough foresight to dodge the initial attack. |
Apr 14, 2017 12:49 PM
#75
@Isterio: Pudding doesn't actually fall in love with Sanji though. She just is shocked that he wasn't repelled like everyone else by her third eye and hesitates to carry out the plan while having huge confusion over the whole thing. It's totally logical for her to have an inferiority complex about her third eye, not that it excuses her stabbing other kids and basically being a villain, but the fact that it made her hesitate and become totally confused by him basically being the first person to ever be kind to her, rather than continue immediately with her murdering intent makes sense. If she'd randomly met him and he'd said that as a random guy, it wouldn't have worked, but given all the acting she's been doing around him recently, she knows he's telling the truth. Would she have shot him if she had another half minute to think it over and regain her composure? Maybe, but obviously now she's lost her opportunity. |
Apr 14, 2017 7:01 PM
#76
Whoa... Sanji's reaction (and his face!) made me laugh so hard... Although now in the eyes of Big Mom Pudding has totally failed in her mission to kill Sanji, and if he and his family survive (which is likely enough), Linlin won't get the Germa soldiers as she planned, and her image in front of all those big names attending the wedding will take a big hit. Knowing that, if Big Mom doesn't die (and I don't think she will yet) she's bound to want Pudding dead for her failure and its consequences, so probably Sanji is gonna want to take her with them, or at least help her escape. There's also Brulée and that train man whose name I don't remember. I don't think those can go back with Big Mom anymore, so maybe Pudding will escape with them. In any case, there is a big chance of her interacting with the Straw Hats a little more, and that is gonna be quite interesting, after everything that happened. Also, that will probably give some answers to those who want to know if she "is gonna be good now". For now, in the next chapter we may just see Sanji chivalrously holding her when they fall from the cake Luffy just destroyed, or something like that. About the upcoming "battle" (more like a survival challenge)... I've got no idea about how it's going to develop. Big Mom is not likely to be dying for now (she wouldn't be able to open the Tamatebako :P), and apparently this arch won't last much longer, so I guess they'll just fail at killing her, get the Germas and somehow get out of there. Also, they have 3 poison guns, so probably something is gonna happen so they have to use all of them (and still fail to kill her?), ooor they will use them for something else. We'll see... Oh! And Sanji's observation haki is already getting to a good point. For some reason I can imagine him using it to flirt with ladies by foreseeing their reactions to his actions when he gets to that level :P (although that wouldn't be very much like him, I guess?) |
Kail-2i3Apr 14, 2017 7:21 PM
Apr 15, 2017 12:54 AM
#77
Sanji's evasion was awesome..and the way he smooth-talk Pudding too , way to go , man !! and I think Big Mom have a very big shock there .. LOL !!! rather than Luffy , she must be surprised to see her giant cake being eaten |
Apr 15, 2017 4:51 AM
#78
Apr 15, 2017 6:35 AM
#79
and people are saying sanji's been booted out of the monster trio..... easily dodging an attack from a sweet commander like nothing O.o |
Apr 15, 2017 10:27 AM
#80
HalibelTheEspada said: Isterio said: You know, I'll just go ahead and accept that you probably did, somewhere along the lines say that it was possible. I don't have the time or patience to go through all your posts, so I'll just admit that I'm wrong about that, and you probably did say that.Go ahead and read through the last 50 posts I made within the last 15 chapters. I talked alot about that reveal several pages worth of text and my two opinions towards Pudding where: 1. Either her turning out to be a triple agent. Her foooling the Strawhats purposefully to safe them 2. Oda pulling the bullshit card and making her fall in love with Sanji, due to a gag. Hence my youtube link, right below the "called that shit meme". 3. If you try to refute my argument by claiming how "I just used vague descriptions and therefore I´d been right anyway". No I didn´t! I considered those two options specifically. I still think Pudding is a terrible perso. Specifically describing a scenartio, where she becomes ironically, the only woman of the series, that wants to be with him. But he doesn´t appreciate it because of her evilness. This being only one of a few scenarios for a Sanji loving Pudding. Evoked through Sanji´s womanzing personality. The core of my argument being Pudding falling for Sanji because of said character trait. This is what I had predicted. I was opposed against the idea, of Pudding actually following through , with the attempted murder of Sanji. Meaning that if she did attempted to shoot him and he dodged the bullet, I would have been wrong and disliked the outcome personally. Have fun finding those posts. It´s your obligation to prove me wrong, since I simply can refer to them. "You" are the one accusing me of being wrong here. when the prove is right there. I specifically added this: I didn't miss the link, I just didn't add it, because it takes up a lot of space for my already lengthy post, so I just mentioned it instead. I wouldn't say that you gave "vague" descriptions, you definitely went into a lot of detail. I do know that you gave a ton more possibilities than that, though, and none of them did you consider good. If everything is considered bullshit to you, you're only gonna get bullshit. You're gonna have to accept that not every single thing that happens is going to be above being predicted. Why do you need to focus only on the few things you don't like? The rare times I've seen you say anything good is maybe just a line or two. I never see you going into detail about anything that you like. There's 100 other things going on in this arc, and the one thing you care about is the one thing that only had a few ways it could go. I think anyone who didn't at least consider this a possibility is just clueless. If you think it's so bad it's good, fine. I don't intend to single you out, you're just the most vocal about your grievances, and you rarely say anything good, it's hard to take anything you say as mere criticism. Well to avoid lengthy discussion I´ll just point out what developments in One Piece I loved in recent history, honest 10/10 material. First there is the Trafalgar Law flashback. It gave a former minor character enough personality to rival that of the main characters of the series. Prior to the flashback, Law was a smart, calculating, introvert rival of Luffy that saved his life during a crucial moment in the story for unknown reasons. We also knew that he had a grudge against Doflamingo that was strong enough for him to go through decade long preparation to kill him. The flashback not only answered all the questions towards his reasoning, it also depicted a heart-wrenching past so cruel that it could have been in Schilndlers list. Justifying any of his behaviour and personallity from his pov. I loved his flashaback and it endeared me to his character. This is why I loathed the the Doffy vs Luffy matchup and didn´t give two shits about Gear 4. It was a shitty fight, Luffy had by comparision no reason to fight Doflamingo after him ruining the lives of everyone else. It felt contrived for the sake of delivering the formula. I so much wanted for Law to get the kill on Doffy and was pissed at Oda´s cockblock. To a lesser extend I liked Sanji´s flasback, specifically the part with Jeff. It expained that Sanji´s knightly-hood was part of his upbringing rather than his perversion. Aside from that, it also was a further reminder, of the impact, education can have on a persons being in contrast to genetics, a point I assume Oda tries to make with this Arc. I could go on why I loved eveything about the Minks and the Zou arc but I´m pretty sure I aready did and I wanted to keep this short. |
IsterioApr 15, 2017 10:53 AM
Apr 15, 2017 11:18 AM
#81
Isterio said: Fair enough, I'll accept that. And to be honest, I haven't been on here in months so I don't really know what you've posted recently anyways... I'm just going by what I see whenever I'm on. So I apologize if jumped the gun. It's reasonable to not like every single thing. Tbh I guess I just kinda see you as my rival on here lol.Well to avoid lengthy discussion I´ll just point out what developments in One Piece I loved in recent history, honest 10/10 material. First there is the Trafalgar Law flashback. It gave a former minor character enough personality to rival that of the main characters of the series. Prior to the flashback, Law was a smart, calculating, introvert rival of Luffy that saved his life during a crucial moment in the story for unknown reasons. We also knew that he had a grudge against Doflamingo that was strong enough for him to go through decade long preparation to kill him. The flashback not only answered all the questions towards his reasoning, So as not to get off track of the OP though, I'll just say that while it was a predictable outcome, I still think it was satisfying to see, and was within reason. I'm sure if she had more time to think it over, she would've gone with the plan anyway, but it got too hectic too fast. I honestly feel like Sanji somewhat planned that, despite how retarded he was acting. I think it was genuine, but had he not already known she had a 3rd eye, he might've actually been shocked for a minute. |
Apr 15, 2017 5:26 PM
#82
Taito10 said: I expected something better, meh. 3/5 Sanji is pathetic. Yeah man, so pathetic of him to stick to his morals and ethics ever since Water 7's "a man must always forgive a woman's lies" after Pudding vehemently challenged it, thus being rewarded when he saw beauty in her. So totally pathetic and not at all character development... Also, let's ignore him dodging a bullet from a man who can see the future cause why not... |
Apr 16, 2017 5:51 AM
#83
Am I the only one feeling that Pudding is gonna do a 180 the way Boa did? |
Das Feenreich! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUvxzKt5GoM |
Apr 16, 2017 3:41 PM
#84
If it wasn't for the moment where sanji dodges katakuri's jelly beam (glare hype!), i would have gave this ch a 2. Oda what are you doing with sanji's character, you had the chance to spike his character development like when u did with zoro vs monet but no u had to pull the kindness s*** and turn pudding "good" again. I really wanted him to kick pudding in the face at some point in the wedding but now even that chance is gone. Now the only thing that can put sanji again on track is going against katakuri, he needs this fight since he's been getting all these L's since the timeskip. But probably that won't be the case since he "kind of lost" against doflamingo in dressrosa (who is at least yonko commander level i think we can all agree on that), i don't know how he could beat him UNLESS he pull something like luffy did with gear 4 he has a new technique. I went off topic but i think u guys can understand why. Coming back to it, another cool moment was the cake presentation and luffy's entrance which i think it's nami's mirage tempo and not brule mirror clone, because a lot of people are debating i would like to say my opinion on it, the reason being that she needs to consent to make clones through mirrors unlike the crossing from the world to the mirror world and i don't think she will agree on that. overall 3/5 really sanji' bit saved this ch |
Apr 17, 2017 5:18 AM
#85
OnePieceGr8ness said: Taito10 said: I expected something better, meh. 3/5 Sanji is pathetic. Yeah man, so pathetic of him to stick to his morals and ethics ever since Water 7's "a man must always forgive a woman's lies" after Pudding vehemently challenged it, thus being rewarded when he saw beauty in her. So totally pathetic and not at all character development... Also, let's ignore him dodging a bullet from a man who can see the future cause why not... It would have been character development if Sanji had actually hit her, in what way is this any meaningful character development? Pudding is the pathetic one, he said four words and she started bawling her eyes out when just a couple of seconds ago she was planning on laughing whilst he suffered. This was just terrible writing all around, on par with Irene's shitty twist in FT. |
Apr 17, 2017 8:36 AM
#86
BurstChaos said: OnePieceGr8ness said: Taito10 said: I expected something better, meh. 3/5 Sanji is pathetic. Yeah man, so pathetic of him to stick to his morals and ethics ever since Water 7's "a man must always forgive a woman's lies" after Pudding vehemently challenged it, thus being rewarded when he saw beauty in her. So totally pathetic and not at all character development... Also, let's ignore him dodging a bullet from a man who can see the future cause why not... It would have been character development if Sanji had actually hit her, in what way is this any meaningful character development? Pudding is the pathetic one, he said four words and she started bawling her eyes out when just a couple of seconds ago she was planning on laughing whilst he suffered. This was just terrible writing all around, on par with Irene's shitty twist in FT. Sanji hitting women would *objectively* be character regression. There's literally no way you can misconstrue this. It's like Spider-Man just ditching his 'With great power, comes great responsibility' principle. Sanji's is 'A man must always forgive a woman's lies.' The entire point of Pudding's character was to challenge that belief; make Sanji break his oath. And he didn't. So we saw the EXTENT of his valour and tenacity. That's called character development. |
Apr 17, 2017 2:35 PM
#87
OnePieceGr8ness said: BurstChaos said: OnePieceGr8ness said: Taito10 said: I expected something better, meh. 3/5 Sanji is pathetic. Yeah man, so pathetic of him to stick to his morals and ethics ever since Water 7's "a man must always forgive a woman's lies" after Pudding vehemently challenged it, thus being rewarded when he saw beauty in her. So totally pathetic and not at all character development... Also, let's ignore him dodging a bullet from a man who can see the future cause why not... It would have been character development if Sanji had actually hit her, in what way is this any meaningful character development? Pudding is the pathetic one, he said four words and she started bawling her eyes out when just a couple of seconds ago she was planning on laughing whilst he suffered. This was just terrible writing all around, on par with Irene's shitty twist in FT. Sanji hitting women would *objectively* be character regression. There's literally no way you can misconstrue this. It's like Spider-Man just ditching his 'With great power, comes great responsibility' principle. Sanji's is 'A man must always forgive a woman's lies.' The entire point of Pudding's character was to challenge that belief; make Sanji break his oath. And he didn't. So we saw the EXTENT of his valour and tenacity. That's called character development. If spider-man did break his principle, he would have to have a good reason to do so. It's not like he just went out of his way to kill people, but if he has a good reason to do so and is conflicted about it, that would be character development. Going against your code doesn't make character regression. In Sanji's case, we already know the extent of his principle when he stood there getting beaten up by that girl in Enies Lobby and Violet and I think against Monet; we didn't need more proof that he would just stick to his rules. Oh, and Sanji's bullshit code gets challenged every single time he meets a girl, we don't need the same lesson again and again just to see the same result, that's not character development, that's just doing the same thing over and over, that's insanity (heh). So basically, what your saying is that Pudding is exactly like the others because she serves the exact same purpose yet this time she was aspulled into becoming good. |
Apr 17, 2017 3:01 PM
#88
BurstChaos said: OnePieceGr8ness said: BurstChaos said: OnePieceGr8ness said: Taito10 said: I expected something better, meh. 3/5 Sanji is pathetic. Yeah man, so pathetic of him to stick to his morals and ethics ever since Water 7's "a man must always forgive a woman's lies" after Pudding vehemently challenged it, thus being rewarded when he saw beauty in her. So totally pathetic and not at all character development... Also, let's ignore him dodging a bullet from a man who can see the future cause why not... It would have been character development if Sanji had actually hit her, in what way is this any meaningful character development? Pudding is the pathetic one, he said four words and she started bawling her eyes out when just a couple of seconds ago she was planning on laughing whilst he suffered. This was just terrible writing all around, on par with Irene's shitty twist in FT. Sanji hitting women would *objectively* be character regression. There's literally no way you can misconstrue this. It's like Spider-Man just ditching his 'With great power, comes great responsibility' principle. Sanji's is 'A man must always forgive a woman's lies.' The entire point of Pudding's character was to challenge that belief; make Sanji break his oath. And he didn't. So we saw the EXTENT of his valour and tenacity. That's called character development. If spider-man did break his principle, he would have to have a good reason to do so. It's not like he just went out of his way to kill people, but if he has a good reason to do so and is conflicted about it, that would be character development. Going against your code doesn't make character regression. In Sanji's case, we already know the extent of his principle when he stood there getting beaten up by that girl in Enies Lobby and Violet and I think against Monet; we didn't need more proof that he would just stick to his rules. Oh, and Sanji's bullshit code gets challenged every single time he meets a girl, we don't need the same lesson again and again just to see the same result, that's not character development, that's just doing the same thing over and over, that's insanity (heh). So basically, what your saying is that Pudding is exactly like the others because she serves the exact same purpose yet this time she was aspulled into becoming good. Going against your code is absolutely character regression because it alleviates the purpose of establishing the code to begin with. It really isn't rocket science. Sanji refusing to hit a random Enies Lobby agent because she's female and him choosing to ignore the lies of a woman who has been established as an emotional manipulator and soon-to-be murderor of his entire family is different. One is an extremity; relying on inextricable thematic links to Sanji's whole character and the other is a simple challenge to the physicallity of his principle. Pudding's was a mental/ethical challenge. When characters meet extremes, they gain character development. We knew Zoro would sacrifice his life to save Luffy, he's showcased many similar traits before Thriller Bark's "nothing happened" moment but that doesn't diminish that moment's place as quintessential character development for Zoro because that's the EXTREME result. Much like how it can be topped again if Zoro actually sacrifices his life, it would make people seem him higher than he already is. |
Apr 17, 2017 3:09 PM
#89
That's like the greatest and beautiful way to make someone hate Luffy forever |
Apr 18, 2017 12:33 AM
#90
OnePieceGr8ness said: BurstChaos said: OnePieceGr8ness said: BurstChaos said: OnePieceGr8ness said: Taito10 said: I expected something better, meh. 3/5 Sanji is pathetic. Yeah man, so pathetic of him to stick to his morals and ethics ever since Water 7's "a man must always forgive a woman's lies" after Pudding vehemently challenged it, thus being rewarded when he saw beauty in her. So totally pathetic and not at all character development... Also, let's ignore him dodging a bullet from a man who can see the future cause why not... It would have been character development if Sanji had actually hit her, in what way is this any meaningful character development? Pudding is the pathetic one, he said four words and she started bawling her eyes out when just a couple of seconds ago she was planning on laughing whilst he suffered. This was just terrible writing all around, on par with Irene's shitty twist in FT. Sanji hitting women would *objectively* be character regression. There's literally no way you can misconstrue this. It's like Spider-Man just ditching his 'With great power, comes great responsibility' principle. Sanji's is 'A man must always forgive a woman's lies.' The entire point of Pudding's character was to challenge that belief; make Sanji break his oath. And he didn't. So we saw the EXTENT of his valour and tenacity. That's called character development. If spider-man did break his principle, he would have to have a good reason to do so. It's not like he just went out of his way to kill people, but if he has a good reason to do so and is conflicted about it, that would be character development. Going against your code doesn't make character regression. In Sanji's case, we already know the extent of his principle when he stood there getting beaten up by that girl in Enies Lobby and Violet and I think against Monet; we didn't need more proof that he would just stick to his rules. Oh, and Sanji's bullshit code gets challenged every single time he meets a girl, we don't need the same lesson again and again just to see the same result, that's not character development, that's just doing the same thing over and over, that's insanity (heh). So basically, what your saying is that Pudding is exactly like the others because she serves the exact same purpose yet this time she was aspulled into becoming good. Going against your code is absolutely character regression because it alleviates the purpose of establishing the code to begin with. It really isn't rocket science. Sanji refusing to hit a random Enies Lobby agent because she's female and him choosing to ignore the lies of a woman who has been established as an emotional manipulator and soon-to-be murderor of his entire family is different. One is an extremity; relying on inextricable thematic links to Sanji's whole character and the other is a simple challenge to the physicallity of his principle. Pudding's was a mental/ethical challenge. When characters meet extremes, they gain character development. We knew Zoro would sacrifice his life to save Luffy, he's showcased many similar traits before Thriller Bark's "nothing happened" moment but that doesn't diminish that moment's place as quintessential character development for Zoro because that's the EXTREME result. Much like how it can be topped again if Zoro actually sacrifices his life, it would make people seem him higher than he already is. When characters meet extremes, they do no gain character development. That's just giving the same lessons again and again. Against Darkseid, Batman was willing to pull out gun and kill him, that wasn't character regression but development because it showed that he was willing to go against his own laws to take him out; it would have been stupidity for him to not do it once again, "oh no, Batman's going to do the same thing once again". Now, obviously, if Batman pulled out his gun on every occasion and started killing criminals, that would be character regression but in Darkseid's case it was development because it shows that he learnt his lesson about how dangerous Darkseid was. In Zoro's case, if Oda put him in a similar situation just to have him make the same decision once again, that would again be stupidity because it would just be reinforcing what we already know, we didn't need to have that same lesson again. Zoro's was minor development because it showed how far he would go, which we've never seen before. Sanji's was something we already knew. What was Sanji going to do? Sanji's just going to do what he's always been doing. In what way was that character development? I can't believe I'm actually arguing with someone named One Piece whatever about One Piece sucking. |
BurstChaosApr 18, 2017 12:52 AM
Apr 18, 2017 1:35 AM
#91
BurstChaos said: OnePieceGr8ness said: BurstChaos said: OnePieceGr8ness said: BurstChaos said: OnePieceGr8ness said: Taito10 said: I expected something better, meh. 3/5 Sanji is pathetic. Yeah man, so pathetic of him to stick to his morals and ethics ever since Water 7's "a man must always forgive a woman's lies" after Pudding vehemently challenged it, thus being rewarded when he saw beauty in her. So totally pathetic and not at all character development... Also, let's ignore him dodging a bullet from a man who can see the future cause why not... It would have been character development if Sanji had actually hit her, in what way is this any meaningful character development? Pudding is the pathetic one, he said four words and she started bawling her eyes out when just a couple of seconds ago she was planning on laughing whilst he suffered. This was just terrible writing all around, on par with Irene's shitty twist in FT. Sanji hitting women would *objectively* be character regression. There's literally no way you can misconstrue this. It's like Spider-Man just ditching his 'With great power, comes great responsibility' principle. Sanji's is 'A man must always forgive a woman's lies.' The entire point of Pudding's character was to challenge that belief; make Sanji break his oath. And he didn't. So we saw the EXTENT of his valour and tenacity. That's called character development. If spider-man did break his principle, he would have to have a good reason to do so. It's not like he just went out of his way to kill people, but if he has a good reason to do so and is conflicted about it, that would be character development. Going against your code doesn't make character regression. In Sanji's case, we already know the extent of his principle when he stood there getting beaten up by that girl in Enies Lobby and Violet and I think against Monet; we didn't need more proof that he would just stick to his rules. Oh, and Sanji's bullshit code gets challenged every single time he meets a girl, we don't need the same lesson again and again just to see the same result, that's not character development, that's just doing the same thing over and over, that's insanity (heh). So basically, what your saying is that Pudding is exactly like the others because she serves the exact same purpose yet this time she was aspulled into becoming good. Going against your code is absolutely character regression because it alleviates the purpose of establishing the code to begin with. It really isn't rocket science. Sanji refusing to hit a random Enies Lobby agent because she's female and him choosing to ignore the lies of a woman who has been established as an emotional manipulator and soon-to-be murderor of his entire family is different. One is an extremity; relying on inextricable thematic links to Sanji's whole character and the other is a simple challenge to the physicallity of his principle. Pudding's was a mental/ethical challenge. When characters meet extremes, they gain character development. We knew Zoro would sacrifice his life to save Luffy, he's showcased many similar traits before Thriller Bark's "nothing happened" moment but that doesn't diminish that moment's place as quintessential character development for Zoro because that's the EXTREME result. Much like how it can be topped again if Zoro actually sacrifices his life, it would make people seem him higher than he already is. When characters meet extremes, they do no gain character development. That's just giving the same lessons again and again. I can't believe I'm actually arguing with someone named One Piece whatever about One Piece sucking. lmaooo you legit unironically resorted to the "ANIEM AVI" rebuttal, I'm done. I'll part with this factual knowledge since it flew over your thick head; 'character development' does not necessarily insinuate 'change' or 'learning new lessons'. |
Apr 18, 2017 2:53 AM
#92
OnePieceGr8ness said: BurstChaos said: OnePieceGr8ness said: BurstChaos said: OnePieceGr8ness said: BurstChaos said: OnePieceGr8ness said: Taito10 said: I expected something better, meh. 3/5 Sanji is pathetic. Yeah man, so pathetic of him to stick to his morals and ethics ever since Water 7's "a man must always forgive a woman's lies" after Pudding vehemently challenged it, thus being rewarded when he saw beauty in her. So totally pathetic and not at all character development... Also, let's ignore him dodging a bullet from a man who can see the future cause why not... It would have been character development if Sanji had actually hit her, in what way is this any meaningful character development? Pudding is the pathetic one, he said four words and she started bawling her eyes out when just a couple of seconds ago she was planning on laughing whilst he suffered. This was just terrible writing all around, on par with Irene's shitty twist in FT. Sanji hitting women would *objectively* be character regression. There's literally no way you can misconstrue this. It's like Spider-Man just ditching his 'With great power, comes great responsibility' principle. Sanji's is 'A man must always forgive a woman's lies.' The entire point of Pudding's character was to challenge that belief; make Sanji break his oath. And he didn't. So we saw the EXTENT of his valour and tenacity. That's called character development. If spider-man did break his principle, he would have to have a good reason to do so. It's not like he just went out of his way to kill people, but if he has a good reason to do so and is conflicted about it, that would be character development. Going against your code doesn't make character regression. In Sanji's case, we already know the extent of his principle when he stood there getting beaten up by that girl in Enies Lobby and Violet and I think against Monet; we didn't need more proof that he would just stick to his rules. Oh, and Sanji's bullshit code gets challenged every single time he meets a girl, we don't need the same lesson again and again just to see the same result, that's not character development, that's just doing the same thing over and over, that's insanity (heh). So basically, what your saying is that Pudding is exactly like the others because she serves the exact same purpose yet this time she was aspulled into becoming good. Going against your code is absolutely character regression because it alleviates the purpose of establishing the code to begin with. It really isn't rocket science. Sanji refusing to hit a random Enies Lobby agent because she's female and him choosing to ignore the lies of a woman who has been established as an emotional manipulator and soon-to-be murderor of his entire family is different. One is an extremity; relying on inextricable thematic links to Sanji's whole character and the other is a simple challenge to the physicallity of his principle. Pudding's was a mental/ethical challenge. When characters meet extremes, they gain character development. We knew Zoro would sacrifice his life to save Luffy, he's showcased many similar traits before Thriller Bark's "nothing happened" moment but that doesn't diminish that moment's place as quintessential character development for Zoro because that's the EXTREME result. Much like how it can be topped again if Zoro actually sacrifices his life, it would make people seem him higher than he already is. When characters meet extremes, they do no gain character development. That's just giving the same lessons again and again. I can't believe I'm actually arguing with someone named One Piece whatever about One Piece sucking. lmaooo you legit unironically resorted to the "ANIEM AVI" rebuttal, I'm done. I'll part with this factual knowledge since it flew over your thick head; 'character development' does not necessarily insinuate 'change' or 'learning new lessons'. That's exactly what character development is; progressing due to learning lessons they didn't previously know and acting upon those lessons. It doesn't even have to be complete change. And what the fuck is ANIEM AVI? If you don't have an answer don't bother saying anything. |
BurstChaosApr 19, 2017 2:46 AM
Apr 18, 2017 3:07 PM
#93
OnePieceGr8ness said: Going against your code is absolutely character regression because it alleviates the purpose of establishing the code to begin with. It really isn't rocket science. Sanji refusing to hit a random Enies Lobby agent because she's female and him choosing to ignore the lies of a woman who has been established as an emotional manipulator and soon-to-be murderor of his entire family is different. One is an extremity; relying on inextricable thematic links to Sanji's whole character and the other is a simple challenge to the physicallity of his principle. Pudding's was a mental/ethical challenge. Pudding WAS a mental and ethical challenge, yes, but it's not that different when Sanji refused to hit Kalfia, the life of Robin was on the line that time too. (obviously besides the fact that he was awarded for it) The whole point of this was obvious anyway, the one time Sanji's morals and principles are most likely to bite him in the ass in the most major of ways, it doesn't. This is the EXACT same thing he did with Viola, not sure why it's that surprising. I would have much preferred if it was subverted this time around, but it's not even remotely surprising. This is only what already happened with Viola, it's what happened with fucking Gin back in Volume 6 when Sanji was first introduced. Straw-Hat does a kind thing to once evil person and is rewarded with it. Those were are different because it was much much faster before the buildup came in. It's EXACT same thing Sanji has gone through over and over. Because no one got it the first time. It's perfectly fine by itself, it's just so damn annoying for it to happen the what, fourth time? And I mean, out of all the times you take this kind of angle, it's in Totland? I guess it was supposed to reflect on Big Mom's hypocrisy, but come on, you have talking candy and crocodiles. edit: rest of the chapter was great. But Pudding's reasoning just seems thin, tried and true. It makes her a more interesting character, I guess. |
ashfrliebertApr 18, 2017 6:47 PM
ゴロゴロゴロ ゴロゴロゴロ ゴロゴロゴロ ゴロゴロゴロ ゴゴゴゴゴゴ ゴゴゴゴゴゴ ゴゴゴゴゴゴ |
Apr 19, 2017 5:25 AM
#94
ashfrliebert said: OnePieceGr8ness said: Going against your code is absolutely character regression because it alleviates the purpose of establishing the code to begin with. It really isn't rocket science. Sanji refusing to hit a random Enies Lobby agent because she's female and him choosing to ignore the lies of a woman who has been established as an emotional manipulator and soon-to-be murderor of his entire family is different. One is an extremity; relying on inextricable thematic links to Sanji's whole character and the other is a simple challenge to the physicallity of his principle. Pudding's was a mental/ethical challenge. Pudding WAS a mental and ethical challenge, yes, but it's not that different when Sanji refused to hit Kalfia, the life of Robin was on the line that time too. (obviously besides the fact that he was awarded for it) The whole point of this was obvious anyway, the one time Sanji's morals and principles are most likely to bite him in the ass in the most major of ways, it doesn't. This is the EXACT same thing he did with Viola, not sure why it's that surprising. I would have much preferred if it was subverted this time around, but it's not even remotely surprising. This is only what already happened with Viola, it's what happened with fucking Gin back in Volume 6 when Sanji was first introduced. Straw-Hat does a kind thing to once evil person and is rewarded with it. Those were are different because it was much much faster before the buildup came in. It's EXACT same thing Sanji has gone through over and over. Because no one got it the first time. It's perfectly fine by itself, it's just so damn annoying for it to happen the what, fourth time? And I mean, out of all the times you take this kind of angle, it's in Totland? I guess it was supposed to reflect on Big Mom's hypocrisy, but come on, you have talking candy and crocodiles. edit: rest of the chapter was great. But Pudding's reasoning just seems thin, tried and true. It makes her a more interesting character, I guess. Yes, I agree. It isn't surprising to see Sanji is still such a well developed character and a man of principle. Also, it is very different from Kalifa. Not only is his own life on the line now (making the situation much more personal), but it was a direct challenge. I don't understand how refusing to hit a woman and choosing to forgive a woman's lies are the same thing. They play into different aspects of Sanji's morals. "Straw-Hat does a kind thing to once evil person and is rewarded." - that's an incredibly general way of putting it. "The one time his morals are most likely to bite him in the ass, it doesn't." That's my whole point. The more likely it is, the more you question wether or not Sanji is just gonna betray his and his mentor's ethics; to the point where people are actually accepting of him to do it. But he didn't. Because he's that strong of a character. The problem here lied with Pudding's extreme over-reaction which made the whole thing seem unrealistic. For a person with Johan Liebert on his pic, I doubt you understand what makes Monster so great either. The fact that Tenma's morals get reinstated over and over again is the same with Sanji. SPOILERS: In the end, he didn't even get to shoot Johan which was actually incredibly mature and brilliant writing because it emphasised how strong Dr. Tenma's valour and code of honour was. Now, Naoki Ursawa is a more sophisticated and talented writer so he was able to disguise the scenarios better but it's the same case. Sanji & Pudding are multi-faceted characters. |
Apr 19, 2017 10:30 AM
#95
OnePieceGr8ness said: "Straw-Hat does a kind thing to once evil person and is rewarded." - that's an incredibly general way of putting it. Sanji does chivalrous thing to once evil person and is rewarded. "The one time his morals are most likely to bite him in the ass, it doesn't." That's my whole point. The more likely it is, the more you question wether or not Sanji is just gonna betray his and his mentor's ethics; to the point where people are actually accepting of him to do it. But he didn't. Because he's that strong of a character. Yes, I'm aware that's "Oda's" whole point, in particular, that's why I mentioned it. And I find it repetitive. For a person with Johan Liebert on his pic, I doubt you understand what makes Monster so great either. The fact that Tenma's morals get reinstated over and over again is the same with Sanji. SPOILERS: In the end, he didn't even get to shoot Johan which was actually incredibly mature and brilliant writing because it emphasised how strong Dr. Tenma's valour and code of honour was. Now, Naoki Ursawa is a more sophisticated and talented writer so he was able to disguise the scenarios better but it's the same case. It's alot easier to take Tenma's moral struggle of life and death seriously (and respectfully) then it is Sanji moral struggle of chivalry. And I find it far more fascinating. It's One Piece, I get that being silly is the "point", but you can only go so far. Tenma alone is a much more interesting character than Sanji (not as fun as character though), and his struggle is more...humanlike and relatable. His moral struggle between life and death...hits you more than Sanji's moral struggle between chivalry and "oh my god my abusive family's going to die". Know what I'm saying? I don't find it badly written, a character's morals are tested to the brink, and at the time where they are at their very lowest, their morals win out, this was clearly "the point" of these past 60 chapters. I understand what he's trying to do. I simply find it DONE. Baratie was literally about Sanji and his desire to feed the hungry, from beginning to end. Gin was built entirely around that narrative, in a similar way. From literally the chapter he was introduced, Gin was built for his turn around redemptive stand against Don Krieg. And look, the problem with this twist isn't really Sanji, I mean, I don't like it, but like I said, it's formulaic because it works I guess. I think actually seeing Temna's struggle for those twenty-so volume, while Johan was stooped so low off his imaginary pedestal by a little kid, truly represents the difference, we Sanji struggle for good on 7 volumes, but "his moment" just wasn't as satisfying as Temna knocking Johan off his pedestal and holding on to his morals. Anyway, I don't like it but I do agree with you that the problem here is mostly with Pudding character and not with Sanji's. Pudding's past backstory was only vaguely hinted and foreshadowed, but because of what we already knew about Oda's writing, virtually half the readers already expected this would simply happen. Because it is formulaic, to that extent. Gin has never and will never appear again, yet he feels more like an actual character than Pudding, Pudding feels simply a narrative device for Sanji to reinstate his morals. She has been reduced to absolutely nothing more than that, this chapter. Johan alone is a vastly more interesting character than Pudding, but I highly doubt anyone who's read both would disagree with me here. Edit: Okay, okay, I've changed my perspective here. This is the most Sanji has done in at least the past seven years now. I don't wanna diss my boy on his shining moment. I'm not mad at him. The reason this has the good impact it does is because, as it's obviously been building up the start, Sanji has been suffering for the entire arc. Obviously, Oda was going to make him end his suffering on a bang and redeem himself for everytime he's failed since at least Fishman Island...I get "the point" here. I'm not upset about him, overall. I think the real negative attention should probably go to Pudding. I still don't like it very much, but I concede my point. It's fine on it's own. |
ashfrliebertApr 19, 2017 10:39 AM
ゴロゴロゴロ ゴロゴロゴロ ゴロゴロゴロ ゴロゴロゴロ ゴゴゴゴゴゴ ゴゴゴゴゴゴ ゴゴゴゴゴゴ |
Apr 19, 2017 11:25 PM
#96
ashfrliebert said: OnePieceGr8ness said: "Straw-Hat does a kind thing to once evil person and is rewarded." - that's an incredibly general way of putting it. Sanji does chivalrous thing to once evil person and is rewarded. "The one time his morals are most likely to bite him in the ass, it doesn't." That's my whole point. The more likely it is, the more you question wether or not Sanji is just gonna betray his and his mentor's ethics; to the point where people are actually accepting of him to do it. But he didn't. Because he's that strong of a character. Yes, I'm aware that's "Oda's" whole point, in particular, that's why I mentioned it. And I find it repetitive. For a person with Johan Liebert on his pic, I doubt you understand what makes Monster so great either. The fact that Tenma's morals get reinstated over and over again is the same with Sanji. SPOILERS: In the end, he didn't even get to shoot Johan which was actually incredibly mature and brilliant writing because it emphasised how strong Dr. Tenma's valour and code of honour was. Now, Naoki Ursawa is a more sophisticated and talented writer so he was able to disguise the scenarios better but it's the same case. It's alot easier to take Tenma's moral struggle of life and death seriously (and respectfully) then it is Sanji moral struggle of chivalry. And I find it far more fascinating. It's One Piece, I get that being silly is the "point", but you can only go so far. Tenma alone is a much more interesting character than Sanji (not as fun as character though), and his struggle is more...humanlike and relatable. His moral struggle between life and death...hits you more than Sanji's moral struggle between chivalry and "oh my god my abusive family's going to die". Know what I'm saying? I don't find it badly written, a character's morals are tested to the brink, and at the time where they are at their very lowest, their morals win out, this was clearly "the point" of these past 60 chapters. I understand what he's trying to do. I simply find it DONE. Johan alone is a vastly more interesting character than Pudding, but I highly doubt anyone who's read both would disagree with me here. Haha dude, I know! Johan Liebert and Tenma are some of my all-time favourite fictitious characters. If One Piece was half as sophisticated and introspective as Monster, I doubt this scene would've been as controversial. Then again, it's simplicity and silliness brings it the charm Monster doesn't have so I guess this one scene not hitting home can be forgiven on the notion that Oda's still trying but I do completely understand what you're saying about Sanji and Pudding. |
OnePieceGr8nessApr 19, 2017 11:31 PM
Apr 20, 2017 8:02 AM
#97
Apr 20, 2017 12:28 PM
#98
HalibelTheEspada said: So as not to get off track of the OP though, I'll just say that while it was a predictable outcome, I still think it was satisfying to see, and was within reason. I'm sure if she had more time to think it over, she would've gone with the plan anyway, but it got too hectic too fast. I honestly feel like Sanji somewhat planned that, despite how retarded he was acting. I think it was genuine, but had he not already known she had a 3rd eye, he might've actually been shocked for a minute. I´m not saying that it wasn´t satisfying. After all i do consider the chapter to be a great one, just for different reasons than other people. As you said it was predictable, yet charming. Nonetheless, objectively the writing isn´t particulary good. It´s a reminder of Oda´s refusal to develop his main cast mentally. In a general sense this isn´t realistic. In real life, people learn from their mistakes, and change accordingly. This is why I completey disagree with your notion that Sanji planned any of this! 1.Sanji isn´t a manipulative character and has been portrayed throughout the story as someone who respects women. It´s been outright stated that it´s simply beyond him to hurt them through any means, even if it´s psychologically. 2.If something isn´t outright stated there´d have to be at least implications for it to be there. Implication, is a writing tool Oda isn´t only utilizing, but actually quite fond of. There haven´t been any. 3. On the opposite side though, it´s implied that Sanji´s flaws just saved his life. His inability to hit women, which nearly killed him during the Enies Lobby arc, came full circle. Another writing convention Oda had already used and we both know the man loves his repetition. 4.Furthermore this outcome would entail an actual moral. "Your flaws can become your strengths so keep being yourself". "Beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder." Something most Shounen manga are known for and constantly deliver on a regular basis. Sanji planning this would be something that´d happen in HxH where people are only emotional when it is convenient and otherwise robots, but not in One Piece. 5. No Sanji wouldn´t have been shocked, because may I remind you. He was so enthralled by Pudding´s beauty that he kept telling himself how the plan and the events with Reiju were a dream. The implication is in favor of my argument rather than yours. I can only repeat myself. The whole joke, regarding the situation, is the fact, that Sanji´s womanzing atttitude, saved his life. This is actually yet again, another recycled plotline. During the Thriller Bark Arc, Nami was wearing a wedding dress, that forced Sanji into consistently eyeballing her, endangering his and her life, because he was a lovestruck idiot. Sanji behaving like a lovestruck idiot again, is perfectly in character for him. Sanji planning in advance to compliment Pudding, reminding himself that Pudding has 3 eyes, for the sake of defeating her psychologically is not. Also the argument that Sanji is the Strawhats "tactician" because that one incident where he planned ahead during Enies Lobby to guarantee the Strawhats escape isn´t valid either. There is a world of difference, between Sanji conveniently turning a switch, off screen and Sanji utilizing deception, to psychologically outmaneuver his soon to be killer bride. If I recall right you were the guy who had the headcanon that Nico Robin breaks peoples necks. Well she doesn´t and this is proveable because her victims keep getting up right after she "breaks" their necks. Same scenario here. |
IsterioApr 21, 2017 12:05 PM
Apr 27, 2017 11:35 AM
#99
MoonStar9 said: Great chapter. Katakuri's hype took a dive though. Has OP precog but still gets dodged? Or should I take this as a feat for Sanji? Also, not fond of Pudding's backstory. There are Minks, Giants, Fishmen, Dwarves, and long-limbed tribesmen among all consorts of DF users but a third eye is freaky? I can't swallow that one. Still really engrossing chapter, and Sanji did something cool so I'm happy as well. I think you should take it as a feat for Sanji because he has similar haki with that guy and he probably can see attacks coming a little just like the other guy can see a little into the future. blfan said: That is all it took to get Pudding to stop her murder ambition, and maybe not sway her to our side but at least not be helping Big Ma is saying your eye is beautiful, part of me thinks that is brilliant writing, another part of me really that is kind of lame and anti climatic. I hate to bring this compassion up, but I have to mention if this was Fairy Tail and Pudding was a Fairy Tail villain that turned because of this, everyone would be screaming to high heaven, this is terrible, Hiro Mashima is a terrible writer, but since this is One Piece everyone is going to phrasing it, Oda is a genius. But Putting hasn't turned right this moment. She didn't decide she loves him and she's not gonna kill him at that moment or anything like that. She was mostly shocked by hearing what she always wished to hear and just became unable to think of anything including the murder plan. She may fall inlove with him because he accepted her fully but at that specific moment she wasn't thinking about love or anything like that. she was just touched and shocked by what she heard. |
MonadApr 27, 2017 11:43 AM
More topics from this board
Poll: » One Piece Chapter 797 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )G_Spark233 - Aug 19, 2015 |
140 |
by KoniginElle
»»
Nov 21, 3:05 PM |
|
Poll: » One Piece Chapter 358 DiscussionVARIAchan - Sep 28, 2010 |
12 |
by PlasticRobot
»»
Nov 20, 8:08 AM |
|
Poll: » One Piece Chapter 1131 DiscussionFMmatron - Nov 5 |
36 |
by manojhi
»»
Nov 20, 6:14 AM |
|
» As if I couldn't love One Piece anymore then I already doDeanomac2010 - Nov 18 |
7 |
by Hokage_2025
»»
Nov 18, 9:59 PM |
|
Poll: » One Piece Chapter 878 Discussion ( 1 2 )G_Spark233 - Sep 13, 2017 |
79 |
by Ranxomare
»»
Nov 17, 8:11 AM |