Report Balibuli's Profile

Previously known as kFYatek.

Rating scale:

My scores are calculated using some rather elaborate Excel sheet that takes six factors into account: memorability, story, consistency, emotional impact, technical quality, and subjective ranking. I had too much trouble calibrating my rating scale in a fair way while rating with more direct methods.

That's why the score boundaries are somewhat blurry and even I don't know exactly how they work :D But in general, it goes more or less like this:

10. Pretty much flawless. Saying anything bad about such show would be extreme nitpicking.
9. I realize some flaws, but the overall enjoyment is still extremely high - still an instant classic that leaves a deep impression.
8. Not the God-tier any more, but it's still a really good watch, well above the average.
7. Enjoyable, but nothing that particularly stands out in the sea of shows. Usually the type of shows you hype about while watching them, but forget about after a month or two.
6. Still enjoyable if you're not expecting a masterpiece, but the kind of show you feel well right from the start that something is off about.
5. Mediocrity level. Watchable, but not worth remembering.
4. Not only not worth remembering - those shows are almost impossible to remember.
3. Just above the watchability threshold. Shows that I've seen, but maybe I wish I haven't.
1, 2. Unwatchable. I'll probably never give those grades, as I generally don't rate shows I haven't finished, and finishing an unwatchable show is pretty much impossible.
Unrated. INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR MEANINGFUL ANSWER, to quote a certain piece of literature. Shows that I don't feel qualified to rate.