Forum Settings
Forums
New
Jun 10, 2011 10:19 AM
#1

Offline
Feb 2009
951
Spotlight Anime: Mahou Shoujo Madoka★Magica



MAL Anime Information Page: Mahou Shoujo Madoka★Magica


MAL Score – 8.87 (scored by 18065 users)
Ranked - #13
Popularity - #237

In this thread we will conduct a discussion about the anime. You are free to structure your thoughts at will, both in terms of length and which aspects of the title you consider worth mentioning; and to further civilly discuss issues of contention with other members.


HiroM_Dec 31, 2022 3:44 AM


Reply Disabled for Non-Club Members
Jun 10, 2011 10:24 AM
#2

Offline
Jul 2007
1420
From my recently revised Madoka review:


Supplementary material:
Character analysis for Sayaka


Character analysis for Kyouko



Personally, I'm not fond of walls of text, but this stuff has been accumulating for quite a while now.
YuunagiJun 16, 2011 1:40 PM
Jun 11, 2011 7:36 AM
#3

Offline
Dec 2008
631
Animation: 6/10. Truthfully this was the one flaw that I found to Madoka, because not only was the art style completely different from the show's plotline but I could never tear my eyes away from how fat the faces looked. xP The other thing is that there were rather small quips I had with the animation iself besides the style; these mostly happened in the first few episodes (for example, episode 1 where Madoka is running through a hallway and opens a door to find Homura fighting and Kyuubei watching. When Madoka opens that door, it always looks like there's some lag in the animation: like they completely missed a frame! That's going to forever irritate me, unless they fix it in the BD. The other thing is how Madoka ran when she was running down the same hallway. A shot of only her back legs was shown and her legs weren't kicking directly behind her, but more to the sides of her with each step. I'm pretty sure my legs don't veer off near my thighs when I run. However when it came to animating fight sequences, they did quite well; so normally I'd give this a 5 for average, but I'll give it a 6 for the nicely-executed animated fight scenes and such.

Sound: 10/10. The soundtrack for this show was phenomenal, and if the CD wasn't so difficult to find, I'd buy it in a heartbeat. It utilized a lot of orchestral stuff as well as a choir. The OST contained a combination of light, fun-sounding songs and the dark orchestral pieces. Its one of those shows where I sat back and just thought, 'Damn, this is some awesome music' while watching the show. I honestly don't have anything bad to say about the OST.
The voice-acting of the characters appeared to be rather good as well; they captured the pain of the Puella Magi quite well.

Characters: 8/10. The characters presented in Madoka were all pretty unique yet all on a similar plane in regards to their situation. While at the start they are displayed as normal school girls, when they undergo massive character development and become the Puella Magi, suddenly the audience is just sucked into their lives. I liked this sort of character development because it was something I wasn't really expecting at the start. SHAFT always tends to mess with our minds!

Story: 10/10. The story was, in a word, incredible. I loved practically every second of it and plot twists just kept being unveiled with each episode. This made the pacing really fast but not really difficult to follow, I found. 'Definitely a unique plot amidst the other Magical Girl anime.

Enjoyment: 10/10. 'Just couldn't get enough. <3
Jun 11, 2011 11:11 AM
#4

Offline
Jan 2009
737
Okay, now the main commendable part of this anime, is the animation. They obviously had wet dreams while awake, making this, it uses many techniques in a collage like environment. They lovingly create an alternate reality in the witches' lairs, however, this doesn't even differ from the real world much anyway. That's because there is no physics that stay tangible, everything is HUGE [what, did Japan suddenly become 20 times bigger?] this includes, um, every single building shown, and most of the outdoors too.
So why is there this disparity from our world into madoka's world?
Good question. I have no idea either. Maybe to make it even more effective for those otakus tripping balls.
Unfortunately, none of the actual techniques of animation are mastered within madoka. Though, the contribution of these different styles does make it interesting to watch. Jack of all trades, master of none. This is especially apparent in the earlier episodes where they don't even have to focus on much content wise and have stuff like unfinished faces being used in the actual show [filters and layers have a multiplier effect per episode, this must be crazy bpm!]. 4:3 sort of makes it look better. that isn't such a good thing.
Next are the characters. Meticulously built to stereotypes in the first 9 episodes, with contrasting and conflicting views post puellafication, we have perhaps a bit of fun.
Then we have parallel times shown, and again we have these simple characters, yet again with variance in their personalities while keeping their appearance and main trait. Interesting?
One simple point is that with different effects, as per the suffering creates power rule, there would be different levels of personality warping with different timelines having different equivalents.
Why exactly in the original timeline of homura, the other are not present can be explained by this. Why homura, with pro-puella madoka and mami, did not become a puella before miss terminator arrives, is more of a question.
As is how homura, and especially madoka, when mortal, are able to transport themselves into mid air destroyed skyscrapers when terminator has arrived.
Most of the character development is shown in episodes 10-12, though not for stereotype aggresive lad kyouko. Poor kyouko.
kamijou is an interesting trait in the story, and the most consistent character. What exactly caused that accident anyway? And so why, when post killing all witches before they happen, does he not suffer that accident?
kyubey and homura are very in depth characters, even if they have their flaws in context.
Also the teacher, the best character. Hilarious. She does it so well, and her voice actor did it perfectly. Why and how that conversation happened in episode 11 though, is another mystery. Totally out of context and character.
That leads to voice actors. I think they all played their roles quite well, even if they were cursed by being unsynced and having crappy illogical and inconsistent roles to work with. The family unit of madoka particularly shines out, and kitamura, mizuhashi, and yuuri; play their sterotypes consumately. kato was perhaps bad, or perhaps good. For something supposedly emotion free, that was performed extremely badly. For something that is a dramatic prop, that was performed excellently.
The soundtrack? Well it integrated fairly well. It was cut very well at episode 10-11 actually building some sort of tension, that is unfortunately destroyed with anticlimax. Nothing very special though.
Now arriving at the plot. First, lol science. That was worse than even Asura Cryin' 2. And that is fucking saying something. It doesn't even matter in the end though, does it? It's not like anyone who would watch madoka would know science anyway.
On the same strain, there is logic. And while many anime have a perceptive lack of it, it is more a question of what logic is there even in madoka?
For instance, as kyubey said, madoka had a loving life etc etc, what caused her progression into power of sadeynessy boohoo, was being repeated. Even though those alternate universes must have existed anyway, I can understand the possibility of homura's connections causing this impossible situation. So hang on, if this is true, how the fuck did madoka turn into a puella in the first fucking timeline. She couldn't have.
And if you think episode 12 makes sense.... well, um. awkward.
Plain things like only teenage girls can experience this kind of sadness!... what? Though I guess, magical girls, yay! That must mean the show makes no sense. Though, if they make the suggestion that it does...
It is really beyond ridiculous. madoka is the biggest troll since angel beats, which is again, saying a lot.
If we are to look at it as a parable, what of it? .... Friendship? The simple fact that all the main characters would have ceased to exist after the wish of madoka is a bit troubling.
Um... You should steal your friends boyfriend for great enjoyment? I havn't got a clue.
You should read out of the way Germanic texts caus.... Um?
That code wasn't even particularly relevant, and again showed the halfassed job this production received.
ridojiriJun 11, 2011 11:24 AM
Jun 11, 2011 4:03 PM
#5

Offline
Jul 2007
1420
ridojiri said:
So hang on, if this is true, how the fuck did madoka turn into a puella in the first fucking timeline. She couldn't have.
It's Madoka's nature and desire to be of help to people, but her low self-confidence leads her to believe that becoming a magical girl is the most viable method. Her thoughts at the end of episode 2 and her chat with Mami in episode 3 make that clear enough.


ridojiri said:
And if you think episode 12 makes sense.... well, um. awkward.
ridojiri said:
If we are to look at it as a parable, what of it? .... Friendship?
Not friendship, altruism. If you want to be good, pay the price. Come on, as if airing the last episode on Good Friday wasn't explicit enough!

Conventional morality dictates that there must be a reward for every good deed, but doing good deeds assuming that to be true is contrary to the spirit of selflessness. Some girls such as Sayaka willfully try to carry the burden on their own but are inevitably crushed under its weight. It's not that Sayaka did anything wrong, but her desire to be loved hinders her from doing so. Only people whose desire is to help others (i.e. Madoka and Kyouko) could carry the cross. Madoka only happens to have been granted the power to do so on a grander scale, and her solution is an extension of Kyouko's decision.


ridojiri said:
You should read out of the way Germanic texts caus.... Um?
That code wasn't even particularly relevant, and again showed the halfassed job this production received.
It's not a necessity, but it is relevant. Anybody familiar with even just the premise of Goethe's Faust would realize the similarities of the two stories; the runes in episodes 1 and 10 support this. The direct quote in episode 2 is a very early foreshadowing of Madoka's actions 10 episodes later. The runes of episodes 4, 8, and 9 give hints of the witch's defining characteristics and what led to their downfall.

So, no, I wouldn't exactly call it "half-assed". It's not a necessity, but it's a very nice bonus for those willing to dissect the details.


------


Anyway, here's an interesting quote from the writer from his previous work, Fate/zero. Perhaps this marked the conception of Madoka.

Urobuchi Gen said:
Gen Urobuchi wants to write stories that can warm people's hearts.

Those who know about my creative history will probably furrow their brows and think this is a sick joke. Honestly, I have trouble believing it myself. For when I start typing out words on the keyboard, the stories my brain comes up with are always full of madness and despair.

The truth is, I haven't always been this way. I have often written pieces that didn't have a perfect ending, but by the last chapter the protagonist would still possess a belief that "Although there will be many hardships to come, I still have to hold on".

But ever since I don't know when, I can no longer write works like this.

I have nothing but contempt for the thing men call happiness, and have had to push the characters I poured my heart out to create into the abyss of tragedy.

For all things in the world, if they are just left alone and paid no attention, are bound to advance in a negative direction.

No matter what we do, we can't stop the universe from getting colder, either, and on the same principle. This world is only maintained in existence by a series of logical, common-sense processes; it can never escape the bondage of its physical laws.

Therefore, in order to write a perfect ending for a story you must possess the power to break the chain of cause and effect, invert black and white, and act in complete contradiction to the rules of the universe. Only a heavenly and chaste soul, a soul that resounds with genuine praise for humanity, can save the story; to write a story with a happy ending is a double challenge, to the author's body as well as the mind.

At some point, Gen Urobuchi lost that power. He still hasn't recovered. The "tragedy syndrome" is still continuing within me. Is this a terminal disease? Should I give up on the pure "warrior of love" that I have longed for? Or mount a pallid battle steed and reincarnate into a bearer of the plague... could it be that I can only create pieces that give men courage and hope in my next life? (When I wrote this, I accidentally wrote "courage" as "lingering ghosts". I guess that's what I get for using IME — Ah, I just wrote "IME" as "hatred"... is there no way out of this for me?)
YuunagiJun 11, 2011 4:20 PM
Jun 11, 2011 5:18 PM
#6

Offline
Nov 2007
328
Here's my input:
I think the main problem with Madoka is that it is so plot-driven that it completely disregards the characters. The whole show felt not as the exposure of the characters' behavior when being introduced to this Mahou Shoujo setting(which would have made for great TV) but rather as the exploration of said setting through the cast. As such, at least for me, there's a sense of detachment from the characters because the situations and actions feel forced on the cast just for the sake of guiding the plot in the direction the creators intended. The result is that the majority of the cast feels not as real, dynamic characters who act and react to the current situation but rather blank slates who take whatever personality or mentality just to keep the plot in track.

Also I don’t think Madoka can stand the test of time, after all most of the enjoyment and praise came from shock situations, continuous plot twists, weekly discussion and specially from it being different and so much better than everything else that was currently airing(anything looks good compared to Fractale and Yumekui Merry, haven't watched Hourou Musuko though), so I don’t think an objective assessment of Madoka can be made so close after it ended airing, the hype it currently has(not as much as 2 months ago though) will clearly influence the voting. So I'm voting no, if it passes in 6 six months I will watch it again without the hype to see how good it really is.

On the (supposed) pro of Madoka being an excellent deconstruction of the Mahou Shoujo genre I cannot cast an opinion since I haven't watched much of this genre so if anyone can shed a light on this topic.
Jun 11, 2011 5:53 PM
#7

Offline
Jul 2007
1420
amdx said:
Also I don’t think Madoka can stand the test of time, after all most of the enjoyment and praise came from shock situations, continuous plot twists, weekly discussion and specially from it being different and so much better than everything else that was currently airing
If I were to judge based on plot alone, I would agree with you.

It baffles me though why most viewers persistently disregard the themes being explored in the show. Has it become a prerequisite for the creators to explicitly state that "Hey, we're trying to be deep here" just because Evangelion and The Dark Knight did so? Gunslinger Girl and Silent Hill 2 did something similar, and the only explanation I could think of for the different feedback is that neither of these were popular enough to generate hype.
Jun 11, 2011 5:56 PM
#8

Offline
Jan 2009
737
Yuunagi said:
]It's Madoka's nature and desire to be of help to people, but her low self-confidence leads her to believe that becoming a magical girl is the most viable method. Her thoughts at the end of episode 2 and her chat with Mami in episode 3 make that clear enough.


What exactly would prevent, say, hitomi, from becoming a puella then? kyubey senses those who have trauma in their lives to harvest from. she doesnt have any. her nature? fuck that, her nature doesnt mean shit.

Yunnagi said:
Not friendship, altruism. If you want to be good, pay the price. Come on, as if airing the last episode on Good Friday wasn't explicit enough!

Conventional morality dictates that there must be a reward for every good deed, but doing good deeds assuming that to be true is contrary to the spirit of selflessness. Some girls such as Sayaka willfully try to carry the burden on their own but are inevitably crushed under its weight. It's not that Sayaka did anything wrong, but her desire to be loved hinders her from doing so. Only people whose desire is to help others could carry the cross. Madoka only happens to have been granted the power to do so on a grander scale, and her solution is an extension of Kyouko's decision.


it was delayed because of the earthquake. what are you talking about.
that was a very iconoclastic ending. look at the demons.
burden of what? burdock cordial? conventional morality does not dictate rewards. it may dictate a system like katma, which is very different- a subversion of fate, which is what sayaka is victim of having puellafied.
read between the lines if you want. that really is not what is happening.

Yuunagi said:
It's not a necessity, but it is relevant. Anybody familiar with even just the premise of Goethe's Faust would realize the similarities of the two stories; the runes in episodes 1 and10 support this. The direct quote in episode 2 is a very early foreshadowing of Madoka's actions 10 episodes later. The runes of episodes 4, 8, and 9 give hints of the witch's defining characteristics and what led to their downfall.

So, no, I wouldn't exactly call it "half-assed". It's not a necessity, but it's a very nice bonus for those willing to dissect the details.


nup. and i read the whole fucking thing. its got just as many parallels as say, inferno. also, we expect viewers to decipher a code and read elusive german texts? what the fuck. fuck off.
that is as useful as NGE's numerous cryptic references that together make, like this, bullshit. allusions are not in neccessity evil, but when they become part of what the production is relying on, it is.
ridojiriJun 11, 2011 6:58 PM
Jun 11, 2011 6:08 PM
#9

Offline
Jan 2009
737
Yuunagi said:

It baffles me though why most viewers persistently disregard the themes being explored in the show. Has it become a prerequisite for the creators to explicitly state that "Hey, we're trying to be deep here" just because Evangelion and The Dark Knight did so? Gunslinger Girl and Silent Hill 2 did something similar, and the only explanation I could think of for the different feedback is that neither of these were popular enough to generate hype.

The Dark Knight, deep? ?
Gunslinger Girl, deep? ?
i am not sure how either of these were, certainly gunslinger girl was very simple in construction and about the single relationships between girl and agent with the side effects of having been cyborgified and working for a secret government organisation. it's true that gunslinger girl was done well, but I don't see how it is deep.
Jun 11, 2011 6:12 PM

Offline
Jul 2007
1420
Yuunagi said:
"Hey, we're trying to be deep here"
I meant that as a hyperbole for having to state things explicitly.

ridojiri said:
that is as useful as NGE's numerous cryptic references that together make, like this, bullshit. allusions are not in neccessity evil, but when they become part of what the production is relying on, it is.
This is a common practice in literature; I don't understand why applying this in animation would count as evil. Besides, these were still relevant, not just some random obfuscation.

ridojiri said:
conventional morality does not dictate rewards. it may dictate a system like kalma, which is very different- a subversion of fate, which is what sayaka is victim of having puellafied.
Let me correct myself then: Pre-conventional morality is associated with rewards, what Sayaka exhibits is more of post-conventional morality. Deep down, Sayaka wanted (by desire) or believed she was worthy of (by the idea of justice) some form of reward or recognition.


ridojiri said:
it was delayed because of the earthquake. what are you talking about.
Yes, it's a coincidence, but it's more than sufficient for some people to realize the parallels.

ridojiri said:
What exactly would prevent, say, hitomi, from becoming a puella then? kyubey senses those who have trauma in their lives to harvest from. she doesnt have any. her nature? fuck that, her nature doesnt mean shit.
A good chunk of the story revolves around desires, trauma only makes it more evident. Why do you think everything starts with a wish?
YuunagiJun 11, 2011 6:58 PM
Jun 11, 2011 6:42 PM

Offline
Jan 2009
737
Yuunagi said:
This is a common practice in literature; I don't understand why applying this in animation would count as evil. Besides, these were still relevant, not just some random obfuscation.


Unless you are reviewing something, or writing a crappy fantasy book that relies on its metauniverse, than no, nearly all literature does not rely on other productions heavily enough for it not to be understood without having read the reference.

Yuunagi said:
Yes, it's a coincidence, but it's more than sufficient for some people to realize the parallels.


And if I was shot on the day of your birth, there would be parallels?
False ones.

Yuunagi said:
A good chunk of the story revolves around desires, trauma only makes it more evident. Why do you think everything starts with a wish?


Why doesn't kyubey collect energy [wtf is this shit] from every girl then? Or do average girls not wish for things in their teenhood?
The keystone is suffering. Kyubey directly states this as the law for the power of puella. No suffering, no power, no puellafication. I don't get why you are arguing against the integrity of this anime, which you are apparently defending.
Jun 11, 2011 7:08 PM

Offline
Jul 2007
1420
ridojiri said:
Unless you are reviewing something, or writing a crappy fantasy book that relies on its metauniverse, than no, nearly all literature does not rely on other productions heavily enough for it not to be understood without having read the reference.
If everything were so simple, why would schools still have years of literature classes in their curriculum? Are all those references to Biblical figures, Norse/Greek mythology, Shakespearean plays, and whatnot self-explanatory when you read older works of fiction?

ridojiri said:
And if I was shot on the day of your birth, there would be parallels?
Intentional or not, if there was irony, yes.

ridojiri said:
Why doesn't kyubey collect energy [wtf is this shit] from every girl then? Or do average girls not wish for things in their teenhood?
The keystone is suffering. Kyubey directly states this as the law for the power of puella. No suffering, no power, no puellafication.
Suffering is a part of the process, not a prerequisite.

ridojiri said:
I don't get why you are arguing against the integrity of this anime, which you are apparently defending.
Because it'd be boring as fuck if everybody simply agreed? =P I'd be disappointed too if every member just gave it a "yes" without a second thought.

Besides, you're talking to a guy who gave Because Goodbyes Are Coming Soon a 10/10. I enjoy squeezing meaning out of what I see, and I liked what I got out of this show. Whatever stupid reason Kyuubey has for doing what he does, it's still a story of about desires, disillusionment, and self-damnation.
YuunagiJun 11, 2011 10:31 PM
Jun 12, 2011 12:47 AM

Offline
Mar 2009
1511
amdx said:

I think the main problem with Madoka is that it is so plot-driven that it completely disregards the characters.

While I can definitely understand while you might feel that way, Madoka, as you said, is a plot-driven story as opposed to character focused. I don't believe there is anything inherently wrong with this approach, and I also don't think the characters are completely disregarded either. The reason this story had to be plot-driven is because the story (other than episode 10) all takes place within a period of about two weeks. Realistically, you can't expect much character development as a result of this, but Madoka seems to pull it off anyways.

Each character has a different set of personality traits. From Kyuubey going from cryptic to blunt, Madoka going from passive to active, Kyouko going from cold to empathetic, all of the characters undergo some sort of development during the course of the series. Episode 10, which is one of the single greatest episodes of anime I have seen, allowed Homura's character to be developed more so than the other characters.

amdx said:

Also I don’t think Madoka can stand the test of time, after all most of the enjoyment and praise came from shock situations, continuous plot twists, weekly discussion and specially from it being different and so much better than everything else that was currently airing(anything looks good compared to Fractale and Yumekui Merry, haven't watched Hourou Musuko though), so I don’t think an objective assessment of Madoka can be made so close after it ended airing, the hype it currently has(not as much as 2 months ago though) will clearly influence the voting.


I disagree that Madoka consisted of continuous plot twists. I found one of the best parts of Madoka to be its very effective use of foreshadowing which provided great fuel for weekly discussion. Foreshadowing was done well because the hints dropped in earlier episodes were not hidden enough to go unnoticed, but not obvious enough to give away exactly what was going to happen. My favorite example of this was the reveal of the nature of Soul Gems. Looking back it feels so obvious that a Soul Gem would contain the person's soul! After so many meaningless object names, it was strangely surprising that the term should be taken literally.

The other couple things that could be considered ‘twists’ might be the Homura time travel episode (which I thought was effectively foreshadowed), Mami’s death in episode 3 (which I don’t think was a twist since it is pretty much introducing what the entire series is actually about), and the final episode (which was quite different, but not outside of the scope of what had been going on previous to it). I’m not sure what other plot twists you might have problems with; maybe you could elaborate on that?

I don’t think hype, what was airing at the time, or how recently it finished airing should have any bearing on whether this show is club material or not. I don’t see how this should affect whether or not you can make an objective assessment. The only problem I had with the series is the minimal pacing issues during Madoka exposition dumps and during the finale, but these are not near enough of an issue that I wouldn't highly recommend this show.
RhastarothJun 12, 2011 2:00 AM
Jun 12, 2011 6:09 AM

Offline
Dec 2007
9219
One word resumes my feelings about this show: disappointment.

And it was all your fault, guys.
Waratte Oemashou Sore ha Chiisana Inori
Jun 12, 2011 7:43 AM

Offline
Aug 2009
1335
It was good show, but I couldn't agree with the excessive fan base that levelled this show as being ground breaking. Of course, one should never really follow the opinion of the fans, or rarely that is.

Anyway, Archaeon in his review

While Madoka★Magica may at first seem like a totally unique concept, it should be remembered that the Nanoha franchise possessed some dark themes, Black Rock Shooter featured a young girl's alter ego fighting strange creatures in a surreal other world, and Uta Kata tried to show the breakdown of a person who becomes controlled by their power. There are other shows that explore some of the themes of the series, sometimes in more detail, but in truth these are only minor niggles as Shaft have managed to create a mahou shoujo anime that, like those that came before, successfully displays the true potential of the genre.


This is a paragraph that I highly agree with him and I still think that anime such as Princess Tutu is much darker than Madoka.However, I mostly agree with the last line "successfully displays the true potential of the genre". Madoka was a great idea and had a sick visual to support it, but I felt that the execution relied too much on melodrama rather than anything else in the end.

My second thought goes to the Faust reference that were everywhere in this anime. After all, Madoka wouldn't be the first anime that is inspired by Faust, but Shaft still had to say to its audience that it was a Faustian anime. Because of this, I felt that Shaft were a bit presumptuous with these germanic quotes. Hell, Princess Tutu was highly influenced by Swan Lake, but they had the intelligence not to make a fuss about it.

In the end, I still gave a 7 from pure enjoyment.
-Fixing-
Jun 12, 2011 2:09 PM
Offline
Sep 2007
655
amdx said:

I think the main problem with Madoka is that it is so plot-driven that it completely disregards the characters. The whole show felt not as the exposure of the characters' behavior when being introduced to this Mahou Shoujo setting(which would have made for great TV) but rather as the exploration of said setting through the cast. As such, at least for me, there's a sense of detachment from the characters because the situations and actions feel forced on the cast just for the sake of guiding the plot in the direction the creators intended. The result is that the majority of the cast feels not as real, dynamic characters who act and react to the current situation but rather blank slates who take whatever personality or mentality just to keep the plot in track.


Agreed, and this would be fine if the plot was any good.
Jun 12, 2011 3:28 PM

Offline
Jul 2007
1420
Again, Kyuubey's motives are irrelevant compared to what the protagonists decide to do after becoming magical girls.

His primary purpose in the story is to setup the system without providing a traditional antagonist, the malicious and mortal kind that can simply be blown away with firepower to bring a good ending. That's what separates Kyuubey from the antispirals of TTGL.

Conflict with Kyuubey is secondary only to the conflict amongst the girls themselves and their hopeless situation. The name, form, and origin of both grief seeds and soul gems also emphasize that their corruption is an internal process.


Sidenote:
Wilio said:
I still think that anime such as Princess Tutu is much darker than Madoka.
Princess Tutu was an excellent show, but I can't really understand how one can say that it's darker than Madoka given that it has more traditional antagonists (i.e. the Raven and tainted Mytho) constantly egging other characters towards the dark side. Drosselmeyer didn't strike me as sinister either.
YuunagiJun 13, 2011 7:44 AM
Jun 12, 2011 7:07 PM

Offline
Jan 2009
737
Excelsior said:

Joan of Arc.


Yes, that was particularly hilarious. I guess she was guilty of being a witch after all.
Jun 12, 2011 8:49 PM
Offline
Sep 2009
1759
Hm... on the fence with this one.

On one hand, Madoka does something special with the magical girl genre by using conventions of the genre to express all the themes that Yuunagi mentioned, desires, morality, etc. Also, the shows technical merits are just splendid.

On the other hand, it does sacrifice quite a lot from its characters. More than anything else, they feel like character-types common in the genre simply being used as vessels for those said themes (because that is exactly what they are), and honestly little else. Hardly good characterization; like say Elfen Lied, it felt as if Madoka was forcing me into sympathizing with these characters, rather than the emotion being genuine.

I'm not sure how much all the allusion to German literature helped. Sure it did do a lot in shaping the story and such... but in the end it feels more like NGE's heavy-handed unnecessary symbolism, rather than the connections to fairy-tales which proved to be a necessity for Princess Tutu.
NeverKnowsBest26Jun 12, 2011 9:14 PM
Laugh and the world laughs with you. Weep and you weep alone.
Jun 13, 2011 1:20 AM

Offline
Jan 2009
737
judojon, refer to this a little:
http://wiki.puella-magi.net/Episode_revisions

certainly in at least the tv version, there were lots of technical mistakes.

though the animation is the best thing about madoka...
Jun 14, 2011 9:01 AM

Offline
Mar 2008
1148
You know, Mami was shown to handle killing witches so easily...
It seemed as if she hadn't the slightest trouble with being a magical girl...

I really didn't get any sense that it was particularly straining on her.
Jun 14, 2011 10:08 AM

Offline
Jul 2007
1420
She was the closest thing the show had to the classical magical girl (heck, she's the only girl in the show who even bothered to give her final attack a name). Her being talented and becoming the mentor figure is a consequence of that. Her loneliness and her death after a blissfully careless moment marked the start of the deconstruction.

From that point on, the characters are denied any sense of victory. For example, Sayaka heals and gives hope to Kyousuke ("Magic and miracles do exist!"), saves Madoka and Hitomi, and defeats her very first witch in episode 4. Typically, developments like these would give the characters much reason for celebration. In this story though, all you get is even more dread because, aside from very heavy foreshadowing, Mami's death in the prior episode hammers in the idea that even the best among them could fall. And they do.

judojon said:
More than anything else, they feel like character-types common in the genre simply being used as vessels for those said themes
Quite true. It's not always a bad idea to rely on archetypes though, provided that the writer knows how to make good use of them. In that regard, Madoka's closer to myths, religious stories, or tragic plays than it is to most anime. Besides, I get the nagging feeling that trying to emphasize the characters' personalities would be detrimental to the flow of the story given the very limited time of 12 episodes.
Jun 14, 2011 10:28 AM
Offline
Sep 2009
1759
Yuunagi said:

judojon said:
More than anything else, they feel like character-types common in the genre simply being used as vessels for those said themes
Quite true. It's not always a bad idea to rely on archetypes though, provided that the writer knows how to make good use of them. In that regard, Madoka's closer to myths, religious stories, or tragic plays than it is to most anime. Besides, I get the nagging feeling that trying to emphasize the characters' personalities would be detrimental to the flow of the story given the very limited time of 12 episodes.


You bring up a good point, which is why I'm still on the fence... otherwise I'd just give it a definite no. At the same time though, there have been shows that provided great character development and interesting themes as well in 12 or less episodes, Hourou Musuko or Gunslinger Girl for example.
Laugh and the world laughs with you. Weep and you weep alone.
Jun 14, 2011 10:39 AM

Offline
Nov 2008
7012
judojon said:
Yuunagi said:

judojon said:
More than anything else, they feel like character-types common in the genre simply being used as vessels for those said themes
Quite true. It's not always a bad idea to rely on archetypes though, provided that the writer knows how to make good use of them. In that regard, Madoka's closer to myths, religious stories, or tragic plays than it is to most anime. Besides, I get the nagging feeling that trying to emphasize the characters' personalities would be detrimental to the flow of the story given the very limited time of 12 episodes.


You bring up a good point, which is why I'm still on the fence... otherwise I'd just give it a definite no. At the same time though, there have been shows that provided great character development and interesting themes as well in 12 or less episodes, Hourou Musuko or Gunslinger Girl for example.
You know, Yunnagi's point applies just as well to Princess Tutu as it does to Madoka. In both, the characters are effectively archetypes, and the scriptwriter and director made good use of them. Tutu uses classic fairytale archetypes to give the story a dark fairytale or ballet feel to it in much the same way as Madoka does with tragic plays such as Faust.

And while you can make 12-episode series with great characters, the series pretty much has to be dedicated to them, taking away the focus from other areas such as setting and backstory, with those two areas making up a significant portion of Madoka's running time not spent on the plot itself with the stories of Kyuouko, Homura and Kyuubey, along with the explanation of the witches, soul gems, and the contractual process.

I ultimately believe that Tutu was better executed than Madoka, but that Madoka shouldn't be dismissed without serious consideration first. Thus, I haven't decided how I will vote in the you decide just yet.
Rosa_FOEtidaJun 14, 2011 10:45 AM
Current FAL Ranking + Previous best::
[
Jun 16, 2011 1:27 PM

Offline
Jul 2007
1420
judojon said:
there have been shows that provided great character development and interesting themes as well in 12 or less episodes
Can't really say much about the rest of the cast, but I found Sayaka, Kyouko, and the relationship between them to be far more interesting than anything else I've found in anime or manga. Pretty sublime stuff there.

As for themes, Higurashi no Naku Koro Ni (Kai) and Tengen Toppa Gurren Lagann are the most similar I could think of, but they're not even half as good with the delivery.
YuunagiJun 16, 2011 1:38 PM
Jun 16, 2011 7:38 PM

Offline
Feb 2010
2776
I like the animation and surreal design of Witch's lair. From the other magical girl series I have seen ( a little ) when I was a kid, the likes of Sailor Moon, Akazukin Chacha and Cardcaptor Sakura, it's refreshing and trippy but not necessary universally appealing. When integrated together with the fight scenes, it undermines the tension. It look as though the girls are merely combating with sketchy pictures. The sountracks are commendable, it's so overt in delivering a daunting and disheartening atmosphere since the very first episode.

The plot progression did hinder character development, I still find it difficult to empathize with Homura, her single-handed dedication almost resembling Naruto but with a lackluster reason and rapid personality changes. Maybe because I was also annoyed with Shinobu's direction ( idlezeal brought up this to me ), the constant close up to emphasis something was a little redundant.
Jun 17, 2011 7:45 AM

Offline
Oct 2008
1501
I read through the comments and noticed that no really dug into the the philosophical arguments occuring in Madoka. I started a conversation on baka a while back that might be a good introduction to begin a serious dicussion on the topic.



Not too many shows that use cliche character designs and by now overdone time travel twists like Groundhogs day and Tatami Galaxy seem to hold my attention. But Madoka did. At first I really thought the ending was basically a cop out ending and the time travel twist was beyond overkill. But with further discussion and dissection of the philosophical eliments I think I'm convinced that this series truely is something special. It does successfully deconstruct the moe characters, and it's ending does have a solid moral, grounded in metaphysical beliefs and thermodynamics. Good vs. Evil, not really it's more like a symbiotic relationship between negative and possitive energy that's being played out in this series. Kyuubey could be seen as the absence of emotion while Madoka is emotions embodiment. Yada Yada Yada.

If something makes me think this much it has to have some merit in Anime. Plus the series was well animated, the voice acting wasn't distracting, and the musical scores were well thought out. I was leading toward voting no because of it's ending but after further disection I can't not vote yes. It use of the relvant laws of physics intreaged me. While this show is probably wet dream for psychologists, Madoka probably also appeals to philosophers and physicists, even if it is just the basic ideas being used. One could say Madoka is an interesting introduction to many scholastic ideas. Don't hate me, but the converse can also be true. The craming of so many ideas probably does seem convoluted and probably even too pretentious.
Jun 17, 2011 8:17 AM

Offline
Jul 2007
1420
orion1 said:
Madoka was very good but I agree with a few other people about it's ending basically being a shounen power-up failure.
Except the typical shounen power-up is geared towards defeating an opponent whereas the point of Madoka's decision was to give hope and some form of salvation. I'm not too familiar with philosophy, but methinks the religious parallels with Christianity are more evident.

Orion1 said:
Madoka probably also appeals to philosophers and physicists, even if it is just the basic ideas being used.
Actually, no, he probably pissed off a couple of physics majors with the mangled explanation for entropy. Still, the main idea here is to question what one can do in the face of an inevitable outcome, so I find the transgression forgivable.
YuunagiJun 17, 2011 8:25 AM
Jun 17, 2011 4:42 PM

Offline
Oct 2008
1501
@Oi Yuunagi:

I think? the Entropy debate was fixed at the end of the series. No energy is created or lost. The universe is still expanding. It's just now Madoka is a godlike representative for protonic energy vs. Kyuuybey being the representative for electron energy. And i did say that it would appeal to philosophers and physicists simply for the discussing of the "basic" ideas involved. Plus I was thinking more about the idea of time travel creating and infinite number of different realities vs. the old theory of time paradox's for physicists, but of course entropy is a big element of thermodynamics. I never actually took any physics in college either so I'm just going off the very basic theory structures. As for the philosophy aspect it was if anything, interesting but possibly very "convoluted" because it had so many different philosophies working side by side. It might even go as far as being an example of skepticism since non of the inherent arguments were truly answered. It's another reason why one might see Madoka's ending as a cop out. Today I like it, but if I watched it again tomorrow I might think the plot is just too pretentious and cluttered. The time travel groundhog element did make me cringe at first. I could see how many might just hate the shit out of this series because of it.
Jun 19, 2011 2:00 AM

Offline
Mar 2008
1148
Is this entire thing about a soul residing within a human body having to do with human values a strictly japanese thing?
Jun 19, 2011 3:20 AM

Offline
Jul 2007
1420
Dozer said:
Is this entire thing about a soul residing within a human body having to do with human values a strictly japanese thing?
I'm aware that purity is a big issue for them, but I'm not familiar enough with either Shintoism or Buddhism to say anything specific about their beliefs or attitudes regarding souls.

Anyway, we've had that question raised elsewhere (TV Tropes), and the characters' reactions make sense if you'd think of Kyuubey's dickery as spiritual rape (i.e. it's a personal issue if you think it matters). Kyouko gets over the revelation by the next day while Sayaka... Well, she never had a high opinion of herself. The issue further erodes her idea of self-worth and leads Sayaka towards her destructive coping mechanism.
YuunagiJun 19, 2011 3:34 AM
Jun 19, 2011 5:15 AM

Offline
Mar 2008
1148
Yuunagi said:
Sayaka... Well, she never had a high opinion of herself. The issue further erodes her idea of self-worth and leads Sayaka towards her destructive coping mechanism.

Heh, I knew she was the most emo character I eer saw.
"OH noes, my soul is not inside me, I'm a zombie, I'm not even aloowed to talk to boys!"

Half the girls problems are just unrelatable for me.
Jun 19, 2011 5:22 AM

Offline
Jul 2007
1420
Yeah, that's also one of the reasons why we compared it to rape.
Jun 19, 2011 5:26 AM

Offline
Mar 2008
1148
Yuunagi said:
Yeah, that's also one of the reasons why we compared it to rape.


But rape is violating somebody's body.

This is just... compeltely trivial. It doesn't change anything.
Jun 19, 2011 5:28 AM

Offline
Jul 2007
1420
The response is primarily emotional rather than rational. So, yes, it was rather emo of her; I'm not even going to argue against that. Either way, Kyuubey's dickery changed the girl without her consent.
YuunagiJun 19, 2011 5:53 AM
Jun 25, 2011 8:09 AM

Offline
May 2010
8122
I just finished this today and it was just an okay past-time. Nothing breathtaking, epic or wowing.
Even when I was in crowd, I was always alone
Apr 15, 2018 12:00 PM
Offline
Oct 2012
57
I would personally vote no for this, I enjoy the show and I appreciate how dark and shocking it is but i don't find it to be that great really.
All the characters are archetypical and whilst there is a lot of despair and character revelations I don't really care for a single cast member, I also find madoka annoying she is the good toshoes the one with no wish of her own who just wants to help everyone, she has no goals and is very generic and useless for more of the series.
Sayaka is pretty much the main character for most of it and she is more interesting but again I don't really like her.

Art/Sound/Visuals all really good Shaft/Shinbo and kajiru can all turn out something great.

Plot was shocking element from shocking element and whilst I enjoyed the ride and how everything got twisted and turned, I still don't think it was that great or anything the show pretty much just lives off shocking you with a twist at every turn which is a good time kill but I wouldn't say the writing is amazing or anything.
Apr 15, 2018 3:09 PM

Offline
Mar 2009
130
Personally, I think Madoka is one of, if not the single best anime I've ever seen. It is a show that makes me PROUD to like anime.

The production and storytelling are insanely tight and focused. Visual design and direction is astounding, mixing cuteness with icy postmodernism with dreamlike (or nightmarish) surrealism. Sound design is spot on and Kajiura's haunting tracks combine with great sound effects to consistently generate thick, impeccably well-tuned atmospheres. Themes are constantly at play without the writers choosing to bludgeon the viewer to death by putting them into text rather than subtext. On first watch, events are foreshadowed enough to make you suspect what is to come, but the way they actually play out allows them to still hit with full force. On subsequent watches, the tight pacing, brilliant action, interweaving themes, and dueling philosophies keep it highly engaging as a beautiful tragic opera.

Add to this, post hoc, the immense amount of analytic discussion it has inspired and it's hard not to call PMMM a true, layered classic. Whether or not parts of it have been done before is irrelevant, because PMMM is the complete package. Whether or not Kyuubey's motivation suddenly throws the show into pseudoscience is irrelevant; it also (perhaps primarily) serves to establish the scope of the narrative. It doesn't matter that the time-travel mechanics are a garbled mess upon close inspection (like most time-travel mechanics) and that Madoka's power growth relies on it. PMMM isn't science fiction, and, other than borrowing a couple basic devices, it never tried to be. PMMM is a cosmic horror story bonded to (as mentioned before) a tragic opera, a fight among mortals within themselves and against both each other and an uncaring, alien universe. The surreal design was never a red-herring; it was always there to clue the viewers into the real nature of the setting and story, even before the famous episode 3 twist.

Most of the complaints I'm seeing are that the characters were unrelatable, which I suppose is a subjective thing. But it's hard for me to imagine someone not being able to relate to anything here. Madoka's desire to be useful, but crippled by anxiety and indecision. Sayaka's overeager desire to pursue an ideal, but being too human to bear the weight of selflessness. Kyouko's contrasting outward selfishness and pragmatism, hiding loneliness and an understanding of the weight of responsibility. Homura's hero worship, admiration spiraling into worship, idolatry, and compulsive ownership/control fantasy. All of their fights to balance the hope gained from their newly discovered capabilities with the despair from the overwhelming responsibility they now carry and the odds now stacked against them. Have you ever struggled to be a good person? or to acquire or achieve something, only to not quite reach it? That's what these characters are all doing, in each their own way, but in a context that might be foreign to some of us. We've not all been teenage girls, and we've certainly not all had to put our lives on the line to fight, let alone against eldritch abominations. But hopefully we can see past those layers to the more universal human experiences and emotions beneath, right? While simultaneously being entertained by the sheer spectacle of the unreal aspects of the show.

Anyways, ultimately, I think for one to say that the characters are neglected is to look for minor, unique character settings that can be established by character-focused narratives (often of greater length) while willfully overlooking the broad, complex themes they embody. And, broadly, every character makes a change over the course of the series. For example: Madoka from passive to active. Sayaka from naivety to cynicism. Kyouko from withdrawn to engaged. And Homura twice, from self-hatred to denial (via worship of Madoka), then from obsession and possessiveness to being forced to let go and perhaps accept it. (Ironically, when Madoka does become a quasi-religious figure/entity that perhaps could be considered a valid object of worship is precisely when Homura has to let her go. I guess this begs the question of what it means to worship a person (Madoka/Jesus) versus worshiping the idea they represent (Hope/Love, Forgiveness). But I'm not here to discuss that.)

It's been a while since I saw Madoka, but I watched it six times over the years, alone and with different groups of people with varying amounts of anime experience and varying tastes. Some of them had even seen it already, but wanted to watch with others. It was a hit every time.

When it comes down to it, PMMM has a thematically driven narrative with phenomenal execution (SHAFT at the perfect intersection of SHAFTiness and casual accessibility). The plot and characters exist for and embody those themes, and they function well. In the way it's constructed and plays out, Madoka feels more akin to classic literature than any other anime I've seen. It's something that can be enjoyed at a surface level for its execution or mined for detail on deeper analysis. The worst I can say is that some questionable superficial plot decisions are made in service of the overall narrative, but they should be easily forgivable given that willing suspension of disbelief should have already been pliable in the context of the surreal setting. And sure, it's not in a classic genre and it's got more thriller aspects than one normally associates with classic literature, but I don't think either of those are disqualifications.

Puella Magi Madoka Magica is a classic among anime. I hope it makes it onto The List of club relations.
ZetaAspectApr 15, 2018 3:22 PM
Graph provided to verify that I am a CERTIFIED pretentious jerk.
Apr 16, 2018 10:20 AM
Offline
May 2009
897
Image a dad who desperately pulls his belly in to impress his daughter with his old uniform - that is how tight it is. Sounds wholesome? Now the 40 seconds are over and dad's pride - his old navy uniform is ripped.
The wrong parts are shaved off. The characters are flat mouthpieces of a disfigured Goethe's Faust.

ZetaAspect said:
interweaving themes, and dueling philosophies keep it highly engaging as a beautiful tragic opera.


Which themes, which philosophies and what do they have to do with tragic opera?
Apr 17, 2018 2:38 AM

Offline
Mar 2009
130
Eisigerhauch said:
Image a dad who desperately pulls his belly in to impress his daughter with his old uniform - that is how tight it is.
Is that to say you think PMMM is strangled by its short runtime? I've heard that complaint a lot, but I just can't see it. Then again, I've always preferred a faster pace to a slower pace, but I like to think I can tell when events become disjointed and start taking effort to follow. Or am I misunderstanding your metaphor?
Eisigerhauch said:
The wrong parts are shaved off. The characters are flat mouthpieces of a disfigured Goethe's Faust.
I'm actually interested in hearing this argument. PMMM alludes to and is inspired by Faust, but other than the core element of "the devil's bargain" and "power corrupts" (which are both fairly common in fiction), I don't think it's fair to phrase a criticism of the story or characters in a way that implies that PMMM is just ripping off Faust. (Goethe was not even the first to write the basic story of Faust, as it was based on a classic legend and first notably compiled roughly 200 years prior and already used by at least one other writer, Marlowe. That is not to say that it's categorically impossible to rip off Goethe's work, but rather to put it in context, that there has always been some forgivable level of inspiration and borrowing, and, specifically, we should not reflexively deny it to Madoka roughly 200 years after Goethe's version of the legend of Faust.) So aside from that, in what way are the characters "flat" or "mouthpieces," especially if the claim is that they're all directly parroting Faust?

Eisigerhauch said:
Which themes, which philosophies and what do they have to do with tragic opera?
You caught me; I would not call myself familiar with opera. I just naively felt that calling it an "opera" or "operatic" somehow captured the grand interplay of all the story elements. But even the term "operatic" would not capture my original intent; meaning "extravagantly theatrical, overly dramatic," it seems more like an accusation than a compliment. On second thought, maybe Madoka is exactly that, but in the rare way where it genuinely works without being hammy. Which I guess would mean I think it's an opera? Without the singing, which I suppose is generally the biggest traditional characteristic of an opera. What the hell is this train of thought, Zeta? Why won't you just shut up and stop embarrassing yourself already! I don't know; maybe it's that opera is strongly associated with melodrama, in the sense of works designed to appeal to emotion, and it's only in the context of opera that melodrama gets any respect, i.e. is least likely to be viewed derisively (automatically and thus unfairly). So maybe I'm calling it a tragic opera because I see it as a tragedy (a bittersweet - at best - tale of arrogance, defeat, self-destruction, and sacrifice) and a melodrama that does not deserve the negative stigma attached to the term, "melodrama." I think it deserves better because I think it succeeds at its appeal to emotions without sacrificing its intellectual integrity, and it manages that feat by structuring its themes to operate on the level of both the plot (general and global) and the characters (specific and personal) seamlessly. Furthermore, involving the cast that way is an effective method of characterization, and as the plot explores its themes, the characters develop simultaneously. So I don't think "melodrama" should be used in its modern, pejorative sense, hence "tragic opera" instead.

That aside, for themes and philosophies, I can do a quick brainstorm. If you were only interested in these in the context of tragic opera, I guess you can stop reading if you haven't already. :P If you're still interested, then what I'd say is that the way these themes and philosophies relate to tragic opera is the way they're employed: embodied by characters and developed through their arcs in order to engage the audience emotionally in the melodramatic (operatic) sense. Hopefully at least some of the following are pretty self-evident once identified so that I don't have to explain their roles in the story, because my attention is woefully fleeting.

So, with regard to philosophies first, I don't think the series takes much of a stance on epistemology, logic, aesthetics, or - with the exception of a simple mind/body conundrum - metaphysics. But in terms of ethical/moral philosophies, we see representatives of several schools of thought: from Mami's warm humanism, to Sayaka's rigid virtue ethics, to Kyouko's initial egoism, to Kyuubey's cold alien utilitarianism, to Homura's - I don't know - let's call it pseudoreligious deontology, with Madoka on an existentialist journey being pulled in all those directions, and ultimately having to balance the value of the self, others as individuals, and the whole of existence in broad terms when finally making her wish.

With regard to themes, as my attention wanes, here is a quick sketch of a list:
What does it mean to be human? (Sayaka)
What is a hero? feat. altruism vs. self-sacrifice (Mami, Sayaka)
What is the difference between love and possessiveness? (Sayaka, Homura)
What are good and evil? (All the main cast members, especially Kyuubey)
What is a miracle worth (what price is worth paying)? (All the magical girls)

In addition to these central thematic questions, PMMM also considers mental illness, delusion, and self-destruction, the tension between one's own desires vs. the desires of those around you, the role and limits of friendship, and some religious themes of redemption and salvation.

Madoka can also be construed as a coming of age tale for Madoka herself, from Mami's "childhood" (idealism), to Sayaka's "early adolescence" (a forced and ultimately failed struggle to maintain those ideals despite growing awareness of the challenges posed by reality), crumbling to Homura's "late adolescence" (growing fatalism), and then eventual maturation into Madoka's own "adulthood" (a zen-like, transcendent balance of acceptance and modification of the world). Of course, perhaps this moves too far away from simple themes and crosses into the realm of allegory (and I don't think it relates to "tragic opera" the same way as the other themes do).

How's that? ;) Because this is pretty much just off the top of my head, so I could probably go deeper. Please please PLEASE don't ask me to go deeper. I know I haven't convinced you (and probably can't, because this is an internet discussion and that's not how these things work), but I really wasn't planning to spend a lot of time analyzing Madoka this week.
ZetaAspectApr 17, 2018 2:47 AM
Graph provided to verify that I am a CERTIFIED pretentious jerk.
Apr 17, 2018 5:57 AM
Offline
May 2009
897
The dialogue of several characters features multiple quotes directly from the play. Multiple scenes are incorporated and work as direct analogue. It is however not an adaptation, bereft of integral story parts. It is amusing how quotes work as ornamental decoration for walls, speech and allegory.

It is not necessarily the length rather how it spends its downtime. You could fix that either by restructuring or by adding additional time (dad wants to breathe every once in a while instead of twice).

ZetaAspect said:
Kyuubey's cold alien utilitarianism
is a far stretch and I would regard that as misleading. However, I can respect your view.
Instead of a "No" vote, I will abstain.
I would have to rewatch the series to affirm or deny your reasoning, I currently do not want to spend my time on that.


Edit: Proper quote.
EisigerhauchApr 17, 2018 6:01 AM
Reply Disabled for Non-Club Members

More topics from this board

Sticky: » The End of Critics and Connoisseurs

HiroM_ - Dec 31, 2022

31 by danz »»
Nov 10, 2023 1:08 AM

» Challenge You Decide: Neon Genesis Evangelion: The End of Evangelion (Anime) (1/1)

HiroM_ - Dec 3, 2022

44 by 25saix »»
Dec 30, 2022 3:10 PM

» You Decide: Golden Kamuy 2nd Season (Anime) (12/4)

HiroM_ - Dec 2, 2022

42 by 25saix »»
Dec 30, 2022 3:10 PM

» Resurrected You Decide: Mahou Shoujo Madoka★Magica (Anime) (12/4)

HiroM_ - Dec 2, 2022

47 by 25saix »»
Dec 30, 2022 3:09 PM

» Blue N Rescue Mission: Eikoku Koi Monogatari Emma (Anime) (12/4)

HiroM_ - Dec 3, 2022

24 by Dramaddict »»
Dec 28, 2022 6:02 PM
It’s time to ditch the text file.
Keep track of your anime easily by creating your own list.
Sign Up Login