I don't disagree with her points, but I would have phrased them much differently. The classification and focus on "casuals" and "elitists" in the anime community is completely fucking ridiculous. Piling on others for liking or disliking a certain thing is even worse. Someone enjoys Sword Art Online? Good for them. Please leave them alone. We're all watching anime, and that's the lowest of the low; there is no superiority here.
I halfway agree with the video. While painting the anime community as a bunch of bubbles that hate each other isn't exactly wrong, it doesn't help anyone to reinforce that idea. Also, there isn't really anything proposed to do anything. It's exactly what it sounds like: a rant. All I can say is...sure?
Longer answer
Well, the first problem with the situation is that every fandom hates each other. Understandably, everyone thinks their favorite show is better than others, but it seems the best way to confirm this to compare their favorites to every other show by bashing them to high heaven. It's a sense of insecurity, where certain fans can't be proud of their favorites without it being better than someone else's favorite.
Second is reinforcing the separation by grouping fans into some arbitrary hierarchy of tastes. There's an obsession with grouping things here, and it just doesn't work. Someone liking some Sora no Otoshimono is not immediately better than someone who likes Revolutionary Girl Utena. The Sora no Otoshimono person could have liked it since it's a chill escape from their frustrating life, and it serves as a way to wind down and enjoy a silly show without having to resort to crass pornography for a temporary high. On the flip side, the person who liked Revolutionary Girl Utena could have only enjoyed yuri/yaoi and couldn't care less about anything else. It's not the show, it's the individual. Yet, there's always going to be that stigma of liking certain shows. Perhaps it's because certain shows draw certain crowds, which is why saying "I like Naruto" or "I like Texhnolyze" carry such strikingly different images, even before the person explains why they like their respective shows.
Third is the nature of the reviews themselves. They always come down to basic summaries, reviewer gimmicks, and relying too heavily on surface-level opinions. It's the difference between "this anime is good/bad" and "I think this anime is good/bad." While it's subtle, the latter places importance on the reviewer's credibility, rather than the merits of the show itself. I'm in the belief that every anime is someone's favorite, ironically and unironically. I have yet to know of a show that garners universal hatred, just as I've never seen a show which is praised the pinnacle of anime. I also believe that every show can be enjoyed for a non-base and idiotic reason. Even the worst show has worth in how hilariously absurd it may be, or the lessons learned in what not to do in anime. With reviews however, I don't see this acknowledged as much.
I don't actively watch video reviews, as I find text reviews to be better since they don't have visual and audible gags to distract. However, for a show that I like personally, I'll look up video reviews since I'm always curious to see the opinion of others. Rather than being concerned with if they're given high scores, I'm concerned with how reviewer addresses their audience. I know these shows, and I know of their problems. No anime is without problems, just as no anime is without merit, so seeing my favorites praised for the wrong reason bothers me as more than them being criticized for the right reasons. This doesn't really come across though. It's always "hi I'm a quirky reviewer, here's a show, here's a summary of the show, here's my opinion on it, and here's my rating. See you next time!"
When doing a review, it's important to do the audience justice. For a review that is inaccurate, misleading, or uninformative, it's not just a worthless review, but it's harmful. People will listen to those reviews. That's what I'm afraid of.
there are very few i could see ever truly doing it as job but there are a few good ones
------
from what i have seen of him digi bro has his had up this ass trying to be deep talk on stuff like visual pacing
uber hikari was good
Jmo is the best based on wha he reviews alot of the stuff he has reviewed alot that no one else have review on yt that is fact
"If you tremble with indignation at every injustice, then you are a comrade of mine"
When the union's inspiration through the workers' blood shall run
There can be no power greater anywhere beneath the sun
Yet what force on earth is weaker than the feeble strength of one
For the Union makes us strong
She's pretty much on point with everything, because of course the anime community has an average age of 14 years old. But it's too bad most of her dissenters are the either exactly the elitists she's criticized and/or YouTube elitist casual trolls.
Kind of agree with her points, but what she is doing is still pointless. People who are mature enough will keep these things in mind and kids who are still in elementary/middle school (and ofc immature adults) won't care about it even if you tell them.
This applies to not just anime reviewing but also everything in general.
I don't need anyone to tell me whether something is good or bad, I have the ability to determine that for myself. Thus I have no use for reviews or reviewers. I am not afraid of making mistakes, and don't feel the need to be "validated" by people agreeing with me. I can be the only person in world who likes something and that's completely fine with me, because I like it.
KruszerMay 31, 2015 6:13 PM
"Laws exist only for those who cannot live without clinging onto them."
-Souske Aizen "Bleach"
Some people just aren't gifted with narration friendly voices, damn that was hard to listen to. From what I gathered she was upset about how people don't like Youtube critics or how they don't review what they want? And lol, Youtube reviewers.
Apparently a lot of people on youtube liked it.
Anyhow I do agree with her points. I don't like the idea that we have to discriminate against others for their different tastes. Or that someone gets to pretend they're smarter than you because they like 'intellectual' shows. Of course painting things black and white like she did was a little wrong, but that was youtube, where the regular masses come to go and watch anime that has been put on by unofficial channels, and they need things to be simple.
SightScreen said: Going to have to pass on watching that.
Every single anime youtuber is cancer; there literally isn't a single good one.
nah DouchebagChocolat is the best and you can't deny it.
hes not you know judging him as i do with what my job is he leves alot to
be desired
"If you tremble with indignation at every injustice, then you are a comrade of mine"
When the union's inspiration through the workers' blood shall run
There can be no power greater anywhere beneath the sun
Yet what force on earth is weaker than the feeble strength of one
For the Union makes us strong